Glenview Wellness & Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 89 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 80.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 31 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 51% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 163 beds and averages 102.0 residents a day — about 63% occupied, or roughly 61 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.40 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.30 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.28 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.13 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.51 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.32 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 57% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents for one of seven residents (Resident #2) reviewed for accidents and supervision . The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 was transferred by two staff, which resulted in a fall with fracture of her distal left Femur (a distal femur is a fracture of the thighbone that occurs just above the knee joint) on 01/19/24 . The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The IJ began on 01/19/24 and ended on 01/22/24. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This failure could place residents at risk for serious injury due to unsafe transfers. Findings included: Review of the admission Record for Resident #2. A discharged resident, dated 03/06/24 reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to facility on 10/15/20. Her diagnoses included unspecified dementia, Senile degeneration of the brain, glaucoma (a vision problem), lack of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Immediate jeopardy · K2023-10-05 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident has the right to be free from neglect for one (Resident #1) of 6 residents reviewed for neglect. The facility failed to provide necessary x-ray services in a timely manner and failed to follow up to get results in a timely manner for Resident #1. The facility failed to provide education and training for nursing staff on how to carry out carry out physician orders for x-rays and follow up on the results in a timely manner. The facility failed to follow their policies for laboratory, diagnostic and radiology services and physician orders. Resident #1 fell on 9/28/2023 at 2:00 PM and sustained an injury, the order for an x-ray was obtained on 9/28/2023 at 5pm. The x-ray was completed on 9/29/2023 at 1:15 PM (20 hours delay). The facility was notified of results at 8:00 PM on 9/29/2023. Thirty hours after the fall with fracture, the resident was sent to the hospital for treatment. Resident #1 had a hip fracture and 2 cervical (related…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · K2023-10-05 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, as determined by resident assessments and individual plans of care and considering acuity of the facility residents for 4 ( LVN A, LVN B, LVN C, and ADON) of 6 nurses reviewed for competency, in that : The facility failed to ensure: - LVN B carried out an x-ray for Resident #1. - RN C followed up with the x-ray order for Resident #1. - LVN A followed up with the x-ray order in timely manner and to get results for Resident #1. - ADON monitored that the nurses followed up with the x-ray order and received the x-ray results in timely manner for Resident #1 Resident #1 fell on 9/28/2023 at 2:00 PM and sustained an injury, the order for an x-ray was obtained on 9/28/2023 at 5pm. The x-ray was completed on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · K2023-10-05 · tag F0776 — pattern
  Provide timely, approved x-ray services, or have an agreement with an approved provider to obtain them.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide radiology or other diagnostic services to meet the needs of its residents in a timely manner for 1 (Resident #1) of 6 residents reviewed for radiology services. 1. The facility failed to ensure that an x-ray was completed in a timely manner for Resident #1 2. The facility failed to follow up to get Resident #1's x-ray results in a timely manner. Resident #1 had an unwitnessed fall on 9/28/23 at 2pm and sustained an injury, The order for an x-ray was obtained on 9/28/23 at 5pm. The x-ray was completed on 9/29/23 at 1:15pm (20 hours delay). The facility was aware of results on 9/29/23 at 8:00 PM. Resident #1 had a fracture to the right hip. Thirty hours after the fall with fracture, the resident was sent to the hospital for treatment. Hospital Records indicated Resident #1 had a hip fracture and 2 cervical (related to the neck) spine fracture. Resident #1 was hospitalized and had a hip surgery on 9/30/23. These failures resulted in an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 (Resident #1 and Resident #2) of 6 residents observed for infection control. The facility failed to clean up blood on the door frame of Resident #1 and Resident #2 bathroom. This failure could place residents at risk for healthcare associated cross contamination and blood borne infections.Findings included: Record review of Resident #1 quarterly MDS assessment, dated 05/03/2026, reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. BIMS was not indicated. Her diagnoses included Unspecified Dementia with behavioral disturbance (changes in the brain that can cause forgetfulness, limited social skills, impaired thinking, irritability, and extreme mood swings), Hypertension (a condition in which…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to treat the residents with respect and dignity for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed. 1. The facility failed to place Resident #1's name on the nameplate outside her room. 2. CNA A failed to wear her name tag when she provided care to Resident #1 .This failure placed residents at risk of needs not being met and not having their rights and dignity respected.Findings Included:Record Review of Resident #1's admission Record revealed Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of Acute and Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia (a life-threatening, sudden worsening of gas exchange in patients with pre-existing, long-term lung disease) Record Review of Resident#1's Care Plan revision date 03/20/2025 revealed; Focus for Resident #1 is at increased dependence on staff for activities, cognitive stimulation, social interaction r/t previous condition. Interventions included introduce…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 3 (Resident #1) reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to identify on the exterior of Resident #1's room that contact precautions were required before entering and did not provide the appropriate PPE at or near the door for Resident #1. This failure could place residents at risk of being infected by staff in contact with other residents with infections. Findings Included: A record review of Resident #1's MDS, dated [DATE], reflected that she was a [AGE] year-old female that admitted to the facility on [DATE] and she had a BIMS score of 14, which indicated intact cognitive function. She was incontinent of bowel and bladder, and she required a wheelchair for mobility. A record review of Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-04 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident has a right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside the facility. A facility must protect and promote the rights of each resident. for 4 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3 and Anonymous Person) of 5 residents reviewed.The facility failed to protect and promote the rights of Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3 and Anonymous Person who wanted to continue to be able to sit in the front patio.This failure could place residents at risk of a diminished quality of life.Findings included:Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 12/03/25 reflected he was an [AGE] year-old male who was admitted on [DATE] and diagnosed with but, not limited to Alzheimer's disease with late onset (characterized by progressive memory loss, confusion, and changes in mood, stemming from a mix of genetic)- onset 04/24/24, other viral Pneumonia( inflammation of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the events that caused the allegation involved abuse, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials including to the State Survey Agency where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities in accordance with State law through established procedures for 2 of 2 residents (Residents #1 and #2), reviewed for abuse, neglect, and exploitation.The facility failed to report an incident of resident to resident abuse between Resident #1 and Resident #2 that occurred on 10/10/2025.This failure could place residents at risk of abuse, neglect and exploitation.Findings included:Resident #1Record review of Resident #1's admission record, dated 10/21/2025, revealed an [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of vascular dementia (a type of dementia caused…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, and the comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for quality of care.The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's weekly skin assessment was completed on 10/17/2025. This failure could place residents at risk of not identifying skin breakdown or injuries, and delayed treatment and monitoring. Findings included:Record review of Resident #1's admission record, dated 10/21/2025, revealed an [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of vascular dementia (a type of dementia caused by reduced blood flow to the brain). Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 10, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Record review of Resident #1's care plan, dated initiated 10/10/25, revealed Resident #1 was the receiver of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours if the alleged violation involved abuse or neglect and resulted in bodily injury, to other officials (including the state Agency) and the administrator of the facility for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for reporting abuse. CNA A failed to notify the ADM and DON about an accident/hazard regarding Resident #1 that happened on 08/27/25. This failure could place residents at risk for abuse and neglect. Findings included:Record Review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 09/09/25, reflected a [AGE] year-old female with an initial admission date of 03/24/25 and a re-admission date of 09/03/25. Resident #1 had diagnoses of Paraplegia (loss of voluntary movement and sensation in the lower half of the body), Personality Disorder (mental health…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that each resident received adequate supervision for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for supervision and ensured the environment remained free of accidents hazards. The facility failed to ensure CNA A appropriately transferred Resident #1 from the bed to the motorized wheelchair to ensure accidents did not occur. This failure could place residents at risk of being in an unsafe environment and at risk of accidents and injury. Findings included: Record Review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 09/09/25, reflected a [AGE] year-old female with an initial admission date of 03/24/25 and a re-admission date of 09/03/2025. Resident #1 had diagnoses of Paraplegia (loss of voluntary movement and sensation in the lower half of the body), Personality Disorder (mental health conditions characterized by long-term patterns of thinking, feeling, and behaving that deviate significantly from societal expectations and cause distress or impairment in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-19 · tag F0644 — pattern
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review (PASRR) and refer all level II residents and all residents with possible serious mental disorder, intellectual disability, or a related condition for one (Resident #8) of one residents reviewed for PASRR screenings. The facility failed to ensure Resident #8's PASRR Level One screening accurately reflected their diagnosis of mental illness. This failure placed residents at risk of not receiving specialized therapy and equipment services they may benefit from. Findings included: Review of Resident #8's admission Record, dated 08/19/25, reflected he was a [AGE] year-old male, admitted on [DATE], and having diagnoses of cerebral infarction (stroke), unspecified dementia, severe with mood disturbance, delirium due to known physiological condition (occurring as an effect of a diagnosed disease process), bi-polar disorder current episode mixed, moderate (individual experiences both…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 (Resident #2) of 8 residents, and 1 of 1 laundry room reviewed for infection control in that: 1. ADON B did not wear PPE during wound care for Resident #2 who was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions for wounds. 2. The facility failed to prevent cross contamination of three racks of clean residents' clothing by placing the racks in front of two washing machines in the soiled area of the laundry room. 3. The Laundry Aide failed to keep the clean laundry folding table clean, when she placed her shoes on the table next to residents' clean clothing. These failures could place residents at risk for infections due to lack of separation between clean and soiled laundry and by not following Enhancement Based Precautions.The findings…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$23,970 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $15,887 — penalty dated 2024-03-28
• $8,083 — penalty dated 2023-10-05

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to OPCO SKILLED MANAGEMENT — 66 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

13 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX