No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Northrise Wellness & Rehabilitation

2884 North Road Runner Parkway, Las Cruces, NM 88011 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 31 certified beds · (575) 522-1110 Medicare only — no Medicaid

Call the home — (575) 522-1110 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0605, F0609) — most recent May 2026Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0741, F0758)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (71) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (77%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
3485 Northrise Dr #1 · (575) 382-2161 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
3331 Rinconada Blvd · (575) 680-3779 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1010 Parkhill Dr · (575) 288-2204 · Call to confirm hours
Park
3333 Lunarridge St · (575) 541-2550 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.9%1.1%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine79.6%86.4%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission27.5%22.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit14.4%15.7%12.0%worse

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 263 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

60.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
69.8%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.87U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.48hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.31hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 69.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 96 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.87 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 95% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF60.7%CMS range 55.5–66.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.2%CMS range 8.5–13.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge69.8%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge68.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge52.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified65.8%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting76.6%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge94.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.6%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.0%CMS range 5.2–11.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.931.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.81
RN hours/ resident / day
1.69
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.38
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.88
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.82
RN hoursweekends
76.7%
Total nursing turnover
88.9%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 31 beds and averages 27.2 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.88 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.81 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.38 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.94 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.26 on weekdays — 25% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.81 to 0.82 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 77% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

24
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-05-06)
18
at the previous standard inspection (2025-01-30)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

71 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 61 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-22 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to create a baseline care plan (minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for a resident upon their admission to the facility) within 48 hours of admission for 2 (R #24, and R #25) of 3 (R #24, R #25, and R #26) residents reviewed for baseline care plans. This deficient practice could likely result in residents not receiving the appropriate care and may place residents at risk of an adverse event (undesirable experience, preventable or non-preventable, that may cause harm to a resident because of medical care or lack of medical care) or worsening of current condition after admission. The findings are: A. Record review of the facility Care Plan Policy, dated June 2020 revealed the following: 1. The Facility will develop a person-centered Baseline Care Plan for each resident within 48 hours of admission. 2. The Baseline Care Plan will be updated to reflect changes in the residents' condition or needs occurring prior to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure care plan revisions occurred for 1 (R #1) of 4 (R #1, R #2, R #3, and R #4) residents reviewed for care plan accuracy, when staff failed to revise R #1's care plan with the most current resident information. This deficient practice could likely result in staff being unaware of changes in care provided and residents not receiving the care related to changes in their health status. The findings are: A. Record review of the facility Care Planning Policy, dated June 2020 revealed the following: 1. A Licensed Nurse will initiate the Care Plan. 2. The plan will be updated as indicated for change in condition, onset of new problems, resolution of current problems, and as deemed appropriate by clinical assessment and judgment on an as needed basis. B. Record review of R #1's admission Record (no date) revealed the following: 1. R #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. 2. R #1 was discharged on 05/28/26. 3. R #1's diagnoses include difficulty in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-22 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who enters the facility with diagnosis of urinary tract infection (UTI) received appropriate treatment for 1 (R #24) of 2 (R #24 and R #25) residents reviewed for UTI, when they failed to ensure that a resident received all doses of antibiotic as prescribed to treat the UTI. This deficient practice could result in residents being susceptible to worsening infection or becoming septic (potentially life-threatening when the body responds to infection by damaging its own tissues). The findings are:A. Record review of the facilities policy for UTI's, dated June 2014 revealed the following: As part of the initial assessment, the physician will help identify individuals who have a history of symptomatic urinary tract infections, and those who have risk factors (for example, an indwelling urinary catheter, urinary outflow obstruction, etc.) for UTIs. 1. The physician and nursing staff will review the status of individuals who are being…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident record were complete and accurate for 1 (R #24) of 3 (R #24, R #25, and R #26) residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, when they failed to obtain an order and documentation R #24's wound care treatment. These deficient practices have the potential to negatively impact the care staff provide to meet residents' needs due to inaccurate records. The findings are:A. Record review of the facilities Wound Management policy, dated June 2020, revealed the following: 1. A Licensed Nurse will perform a skin assessment upon admission, readmission, weekly, and as needed for each resident. Upon identification of a new wound the Licensed Nurse will: a. Measure the wound (length, width, depth); b. Initiate a Wound Monitoring Record sheet; c. A Wound Monitoring Record will be completed for each wound. d. See Staging Guidelines for more information about assessing wounds. e. The Wound Monitoring Record is optional for recording skin tears, lacerations,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-05-06 · tag F0945 — failed to train staff on abuse prevention — widespread
    Include as part of its infection prevention and control program, mandatory training that includes written standards, policies, and procedures for the program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide infection control training (training that helps staff recognize various infection control prevention to help stop the spread of infections) for 4 (LPN #1, LPN #2, LPN #3 and CNA #1) of 4 (LPN #1, LPN #2, LPN #3 and CNA #1) staff sampled for enhanced barrier precautions (EBP; Infection control measures in nursing homes that require staff to wear gowns and gloves during high-contact care activities to prevent the spread of multidrug-resistant organisms [MDRO's bacteria or fungi that are resistant to one or more classes of antimicrobial agents]) training. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all 26 residents in the facility (residents identified by the matrix provided by the administrator on 04/29/26) and could likely result in inadequate infection control, can lead to increased spread of resistant organisms, and risk of infections among residents and staff. The findings are:A. Record review of staff training revealed:No record of EBP training for LPN #1, LPN #2 and LPN #3.No record of EBP training for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-06 · tag F0628 — pattern
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide the required discharge or transfer information for 3 (R #38, R #40, and R #57) of 7 (R #15, R #30, R #31, R #38, R #40, R #47, and R #57) residents reviewed for discharges and hospitalizations when staff failed to: 1. Notify R #38, R #40, or R #57 and their representative(s) of the residents' discharge or transfer to the hospital in writing and in a language and manner they understand. 2. Ensure the discharge or transfer notices for R #38, R #40, or R #57 included: a. A statement of the resident's appeal rights, including the name, address (mailing and email), and telephone number of the entity which receives such requests; and information on how to obtain an appeal form and assistance in completing the form and submitting the appeal hearing request. b. The name, phone number, and address (mailing and email) of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman (an advocate for residents in nursing homes and assisted living facilities).3. Send a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-06 · tag F0655 — pattern
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to create an accurate baseline care plan (minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for a resident upon their admission to the facility) within 48 hours of admission for 5 (R #20, R #38, R #46, R #47, and R #49) of 5 (R #20, R #38, R #46, R #47, and R #49) residents reviewed for baseline care plans. This deficient practice could likely result in residents not receiving the appropriate care and may place residents at risk of an adverse event (undesirable experience, preventable or non-preventable, that may cause harm to a resident because of medical care or lack of medical care) or worsening of current condition after admission. The findings are: R #20 A. Record review of R #20's admission Record, no date, revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #20's medical record revealed staff did not document a baseline care plan within 48 hours of her admission to the facility. C. On 05/05/26 at 3:50 PM, during an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement accurate, person-centered comprehensive care plans for 8 (R #13, R #15, R #28, R #30, R # 31, R #41, R #54, and R #59) of 8 (R #13, R #15, R #28, R #30, R # 31, R #41, R #54, and R #59) residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. This deficient practice could likely result in staff being unaware of the current and actual needs of the residents and worsening of the pressure ulcers. The findings are: R #13 A. Record review of R #13's admission Record, no date, revealed R #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #13's physician's orders revealed the following orders; 1. Dated 03/15/26 and discontinued 04/13/26, for hydrocodone-acetaminophen (a prescription opioid combination used to treat moderate to severe pain) 5-325 mg every 6 hours PRN for pain. 2. Dated 04/13/26, for hydrocodone-acetaminophen 5-325 mg every 4 hours as needed for pain. 3. Dated 03/16/26 for Lovenox (a prescription low molecular…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure care plan revisions occurred for 3 (R #13, R #28, and R #57) of 9 (R #13, R #15, R #28, R #30, R # 31, R #41, R #54, R #57, and R #59) residents reviewed for care plan accuracy, when staff failed to:1. Ensure the IDT members participated in a care plan meeting within 7 days of the completion of the admission MDS assessment for R #13, R #28, and R #57.2. Revise R #13's care plan with the most current resident information. These deficient practices could likely result in staff being unaware of changes in care provided, and residents not receiving the care related to changes in their health status or healthcare decisions. The findings are: Timing of IDT MeetingR #13A. Record review of R #13's admission Record, no date, revealed R #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. B. On 04/29/26 at 2:24 PM, during an interview, R #13 stated she had not attended an IDT meeting to discuss her care plan. C. Record review of R #13's admission MDS Assessment,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-06 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — pattern
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Recite from complaint survey on [DATE]Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure there was a system in place for the nursing staff to immediately determine code status [the residents choice as to whether or not they would like to be provided cardio- pulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in the event that they stopped breathing and/or their heart stopped] for 3 (R #30, R #31, and R #46) of 3 (R #30, R #31, and R #46) residents reviewed for code status, when they failed immediately document R #30's, R #31's, and R #46's code status in their medical record. This deficient practice is likely to delay potentially lifesaving measures if staff are not immediately aware of residents' preferences for resuscitation. The findings are:R #30 A. Record review of R #30's admission Record, no date, revealed R #30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #30's Convalescent Care Orders (CCO specialized, short-term medical instructions provided by a physician), dated [DATE], revealed full code…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 61 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-06 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide an ongoing program of activities designed to meet the interests for 2 (R #31 and R #59) of 2 (R #31 and R #59) residents reviewed for activities by not providing meaningful individualized activities based upon residents' interests. If residents are not provided or encouraged to attend/participate in activities that meet their interests, then they are likely to experience an increase in boredom, isolation, and depression. The findings are: R #31 A. Record review of R #31's admission Record, no date, revealed an admission date of 04/04/26. B. On 04/29/26 at 10:25 AM, during an interview, R #31 stated there were not any activities that she was interested in. R #31 stated that there were not any church services at all. C. Record review of R #31's Annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the following activity preferences are very important: 1. Having books, newspapers and magazines. 2. Having music. 3. Being around animals. 4. Keeping up with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-06 · tag F0680 — pattern
    Ensure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to have a qualified activity professional to direct an ongoing program of activities for 2 (R #31 and R #59) of 2 (R #31 and R #59) residents sampled for activities, when staff failed to ensure the Activities Director (AD) had the qualifications necessary to perform the duties of an AD. This deficient practice could lead to a less engaging and beneficial program for residents and could negatively impact residents' well-being and quality of life. The findings are: A. Record review of AD personnel file revealed the following:1. A hire date of 11/06/25. 2. Her Resume did not include the following: a. A license or registration as a therapeutic recreation specialist or if she was eligible to become licensed or accredited as a therapeutic recreation specialist. b. Two years of experience in a social or recreational program within the last five years. c. Qualifications of an occupational therapist or occupational therapy assistant. d. Completion of a training course for activities professionals that was approved by the State. B.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-06 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medical records were complete and accurate for 3 (R #13, R #38 and R #57) of 5 (R #13, R #20, R #38, R #54 and R #57) residents reviewed for accuracy of documentation, when staff failed to: 1. Document information when R #13 left the facility to have a Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy tube (PEG, a flexible feeding tube inserted through the abdomen into the stomach to deliver nutrition, fluids, and medications directly) tube placed and after she returned from having a PEG tube inserted. 2. Document administration of R #13's enteral feedings and residual amounts.3. Thoroughly document information for circumstances leading R #38 to be transferred to the hospital on [DATE].4. Document information regarding R #57's discharge from the facility. These deficient practices have the potential to negatively impact the care staff provide to meet residents' needs due to inaccurate records. The findings are: R #13A. Record review of R #13's admission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program for 4 (R #13, R #30, R #49, and R #54) of 5 (R #13, R #28, R #30, R #49, and R #54) residents reviewed for Transmission Based Precautions (additional infection control measures used in healthcare settings alongside Standard Precautions. They prevent the spread of known or suspected pathogens) when staff failed to:EBP A. Record Review of the [Name of Federal Agency] Enhanced Barrier Precautions in Nursing Homes to Prevent Spread of Multidrug-resistant Organisms (MDROs), dated 03/20/24, revealed the following: 1. MDRO transmission is common in long term care (LTC) facilities. 2. EBP refers to an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of MDRO that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities. a. Examples of high-contact care activities include: i. Dressing ii. Bathing/showering iii. Transferring iv. Changing linens v. Providing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-06 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents were aware of the process to file a grievance for 1 (R #30) or 1 (R #30) resident sampled for missing items. If the facility does not ensure that residents know how to file grievances, then residents are likely to feel that their issues and/or concerns are not taken seriously. The findings are: A. On 04/29/26 at 12:38 PM, during an interview, R #30 stated staff did not tell her how to file a grievance. B. On 05/01/26 at 10:06 AM, during an interview with the Administrator, he stated the grievance process is gone over during resident council meetings. The Administrator stated if residents do not go to resident counsel that SSD will go over how to file a grievance with the resident. The Administrator stated the facility does not currently have an SSD. The Administrator stated if a resident tells staff they are missing items, he would talk to the resident and file a grievance for them. C. On 05/01/26 at 10:23 AM, during an interview, the AD stated she thought she was supposed to file grievances for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-06 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents did not receive psychotropic medications (group of drugs that affect behavior, mood, thoughts, or perception) unless the medication was medically necessary for 2 (R #28 and R #54) of 5 (R #13, R #15, R #28, R 46, and R #54) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, when staff failed to ensure PRN psychotropic medications were not prescribed for longer than 14 days without a written rationale from the provider. This deficient practice could likely result in residents receiving medications longer than needed without a rationale from the provider causing a higher risk of adverse side effects (unwanted, harmful, or abnormal result). The findings are: R #28A. Record review of R #28's admission Record, no date, revealed R #28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #28's physician's order, dated 04/27/26, revealed an order for alprazolam (a psychotropic medication used to treat anxiety disorder) 1 mg every 8 hours…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-06 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement an effective discharge planning process for 2 (R #40 and R #57) of 6 (R #15, R #30, R #31, R #40, R #47, and R #57) residents reviewed for discharge, when staff failed to: 1. Conduct IDT discharge planning for R #40 and R #57. 2. Update comprehensive care plans and discharge plans with treatment preferences and needs for R #40 and R #57.3. Document a discharge plan of care that included treatment preferences and needs for R #57. These failures have the potential for unsafe discharge and an increased risk of resident harm. The findings are: R #40 A. Record review of R #40's admission Record, no date, revealed R #40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 03/14/26. B. Record review of R #40's progress note, dated 03/14/26, revealed R #40 was insistent on going home. The provider was notified and gave approval for R #40 to be discharged . C. Record review of R #40's care plan, dated 03/03/26, revealed staff did not document a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-06 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive MDS assessment was completed within 14 calendar days after admission for 1 (R #28) of 3 (R #15, R #28, and R #41) residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. This deficient practice could likely result in residents' needs not being met. The findings are: A. Record review of R #28's admission Record, no date, revealed R #28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #28's admission MDS Assessment, dated 03/31/26, revealed staff completed the MDS on 04/14/26 (not within 14 days of resident's admission on [DATE]). C. On 05/04/26 at 2:48 PM, during a joint interview, the DON and Regional Clinical Nurse confirmed R #28's admission MDS Assessment was not completed within 14 days of his admission on [DATE]. Staff were expected to complete admission MDS Assessments within 14 days of admission.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-06 · tag F0640 — isolated
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete and transmit an MDS assessment after discharge for 1 (R #4) of 1 (R #4) residents reviewed for MDS assessment. This failed practice could lead to the facility not reporting information in a timely manner (within 14 days) to the Federal Agency. The findings are: A. Record review of R #4's admission Record, no date, revealed R #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged from the facility on 12/06/25. B. Record review of R #4's medical record, no date, revealed staff did not document a Discharge MDS Assessment after R #4 discharged from the facility on 12/06/25. C. On 05/04/26 at 2:55 PM, during a joint interview, the DON and Regional Clinical Nurse confirmed the following:1. R #4 was discharged from the facility on 12/06/25.2. R #4's medical record did not have a Discharge MDS Assessment. 3. Staff were expected to complete a Discharge MDS Assessment after residents were discharged from the facility.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-06 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the MDS was accurate for 1 (R #15) of 7 (R #13, R #15, R #28, R #30, R #31, R #41 and R #57) residents reviewed for accurate MDS assessments. This deficient practice could likely result in the facility not having an accurate assessment of the residents' needs. The findings are: A. Record review of R #15's admission Record, no date, revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #15's physician orders revealed an order dated 03/31/26: Lantus (long-lasting insulin designed to provide a steady 24-hour release of the medication to help regulate blood sugar levels) inject 15 units subcutaneously (medication given by injection just below the skin) one time daily for diabetes mellitus. D. Record review of R #15's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the following: 1. Under the insulin section of the MDS, staff documented R #15 received insulin for the previous two days since her admission to the facility. 2. Under…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-06 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide services that meet professional standards of practice for 2 (R #30 and R #31) of 2 (R #30 and R #31) residents randomly reviewed, when staff failed to monitor R #30's and R #31's weight as ordered. This deficient practice could likely result in staff being unaware of weight gain/loss. The findings are: R #30 A. Record review of R # 30's admission Record, no date, revealed R #30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #30's physician's orders revealed R #30 was at risk for malnutrition (a condition that occurs when your body does not get the right balance of nutrients, calories, or energy to function properly), weigh weekly for four weeks, and monthly after that. C. Record review of R #30's weight summary, no date, revealed R #30 was weighed on 03/30/26 and 04/19/26. Staff did not document any other weights for R #30. D. On 05/04/26 at 12:38 PM, during an interview, the DON confirmed staff did not perform weekly weights for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received quality treatment and care for 1 (R #48) of 5 (R #15, R #28, R #41, R #48, and R #49) residents reviewed for edema and wound care, when staff failed to identify edema (swelling caused by excess fluid trapped in body tissues, commonly affecting the legs, feet, ankles, hands, or abdomen. It is often a symptom of underlying issues like heart failure, kidney disease, liver cirrhosis, or venous insufficiency) in R #48's legs. This deficient practice could likely lead to resident's needs not being met and/or a worsening of their medical condition and prognosis. The findings are: A. Record review of R #48's admission Record, no date, revealed the following R #48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. B. On 04/29/26 at 11:21 AM, during an observation and interview with R #48, the following was revealed:1. R #48's legs appeared to be swollen.2. R #48 stated he had had swelling in both of his legs since he was in the hospital prior to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-06 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status for 1 (R #13) of 1 (R #13) residents sampled for tube feeding (enteral nutrition, delivers essential nutrients, fluids, and medications directly into the stomach or small intestine for individuals unable to take adequate nutrition by mouth), when staff failed to:1. Monitor R #13's weight as ordered.2. Monitor R #13's enteral feedings as ordered.3. Monitor R #13's residual volume (the amount of formula, water, and digestive secretions remaining in the stomach, often checked to assess tube feeding tolerance and aspiration risk) as ordered. These deficient practices could likely result in residents losing weight without the facility being aware and causing worsening of medical conditions. The findings are:A. Record review of R #13's admission Record, no date, revealed R #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. B. On 04/30/26 at 11:59 AM, during an interview, R #13 stated the following:1. She had her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide respiratory care in accordance with professional standards for 1 (R #54) of 3 (R #54) residents reviewed for respiratory care when the staff failed to ensure R #54 had an order for oxygen therapy. This deficient practice is likely to result in staff not being aware of residents' respiratory status and worsening of their condition. The findings are: A. Record review of R #54's admission Record, no date, revealed R #54 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. B. On 04/29/26 at 11:01 AM, during an observation and interview, the following was revealed:1. An oxygen concentrator (a medical device that filters ambient air, providing a 90%-95% concentrated oxygen supply for patients with low oxygen levels) was sitting next to R #54's bed.2. R #54 stated she used oxygen when she lays down in bed. C. Record review of R #54's Convalescent Care Orders (CCOs, written orders for admission to a nursing facility, detailing necessary therapies (e.g., physical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-06 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and observation the facility failed to effectively manage pain (use of different techniques and medication to reduce and control the amount of pain a person experiences) for 2 (R #20 and R #46) of 2 (R #20 and R #46) residents reviewed for pain, when the facility failed to assess and monitor pain levels for R #20 and 46. This deficient practice could likely result in residents experiencing unnecessary or uncontrolled pain causing residents to experience a decline in physical and emotional health. The findings are: R #20 A. Record review of R #20's admission Record, no date, revealed the following:1. R #20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].2. R #20's diagnoses include: wedge compression fracture of the third lumbar vertebra (a type of compression fracture where one side of the vertebra [series of small bones forming the backbone] collapses, resulting in a wedge shape. Most common in the lumbar region [lower back] of the spine, particularly in older adults with weakened…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-06 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis (clinical purification of blood as substitute for normal kidney functioning) center for 1 (R #59) of 1 (R #59) residents reviewed for dialysis, when staff failed to: 1. Obtain orders for dialysis treatment. 2. Monitor R #59 for complications before and after dialysis treatments. 3. Provide ongoing communication, coordination, and collaboration between the facility and dialysis staff. If the facility is unaware of the status, condition or complications that arise during dialysis treatment, then residents are likely to not receive the appropriate monitoring and care they need. The findings are: A. Record review of R #59's admission Record, no date, revealed an admission date of 04/26/26 with a diagnosis of end stage renal disease (the final, permanent stage of kidney failure where kidney function declines to below 10-15%, making it impossible for the body to filter waste and fluid). B. On 04/29/26 at 10:52 AM, during an interview with R #59, he stated he was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure drug records were in order and account of all controlled drugs for 1 (R #54) of 1 (R #54) residents randomly reviewed for medication storage, when staff failed to document dispensed narcotics. This deficient practice could likely result in an inaccurate accounting of resident narcotics. The findings are: A. Record review of R #54's admission Record, no date, R #54 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #54's physician's order, dated 04/22/26, revealed an order for oxycodone (used to treat moderate to severe pain) 5 mg, give one tablet every 4 hours. C. On 05/04/26 at 2:32 PM, during an observation, R #54 control substance log for oxycodone 5 mg, showed staff documented that there should be 50 capsules. Observation of the medication card revealed there were only 48 capsules. D. On 05/04/26 at 2:32 PM, during an interview, LPN #8 stated that she had given R #54 two doses of oxycodone 5 mg before her appointment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-06 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff implemented comprehensive antibiotic stewardship practices (a set of commitments and actions designed to optimize the treatment of infections while reducing the adverse events associated with antibiotic use) for 1(R #15) of 1 (R #15) resident's reviewed for antibiotic use when they failed to provide an end date for R #15's antibiotics. This deficient practice could likely result in the inappropriate use of antibiotics that can lead to antibiotic resistance (significant risk associated with long-term antibiotic use when bacteria change to resist antibiotics that used to effectively treat them) and multi-drug resistant organisms (pathogens, primarily bacteria, that have developed resistance to multiple antibiotics, making them less susceptible to standard treatments) The findings are: A. Record review of R #15's physician's orders revealed the following:1. an order dated 04/14/26 for amoxicillin 500 mg by mouth three times daily for tooth infection. The order was end-date was entered as indefinite (no date to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-07 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure there was a functional system in place to ensure staff could initiate/not initiate CPR (Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation lifesaving technique, aims to blood and oxygen flowing through the body) during an emergency for 1 (R #1) of 2 (R #1 and R #2) resident reviewed for hospitalization, when staff failed to honor the code status (type of emergency treatment a person would or would not receive if their heart or breathing were to stop) wishes of R #1's POA. This deficient practice could likely cause confusion among the nursing staff who may not be aware of which residents are Full-Code (if the person's heart stopped beating, or stopped breathing, all resuscitation procedures will be provided to keep them alive) and those residents who wish to be a DNR (Do Not Resuscitate) (No code, allow natural death), then residents are likely to receive the incorrect initiation of CPR (Cardio Pulmonary Resuscitation, lifesaving technique, aims to blood and oxygen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to create an accurate baseline care plan (minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for a resident upon their admission to the facility) within 48 hours of admission for 1 (R #2) of 2 (R #2 and R #4) residents reviewed for baseline care plans. This deficient practice could likely result in residents not receiving the appropriate care and may place residents at risk of an adverse event (undesirable experience, preventable or non-preventable, that caused harm to a resident because of medical care or lack of medical care) or worsening of current condition after admission. The findings are: A. Record review of R #2's admission Record, no date, revealed he was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #2's Admission MDS, dated [DATE], revealed the following: 1. Staff documented R #2 had one unstageable pressure ulcer (not stageable due to coverage of wound bed by slough [dead tissue in a wound, typically soft, yellow or white,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement accurate, person-centered comprehensive care plans for 2 (R #1 and R #3) of 2 (R #1 and R #3) residents reviewed for care plans when staff failed to document pressure ulcers and the need for wound care. This deficient practice could likely result in staff being unaware of the current and actual needs of the residents and worsening of the pressure ulcers. The findings are: R #1 A. Record review of R #1's admission record, no date, revealed she was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #1's Admission MDS, dated 01/15/26, revealed the following: 1. Staff documented R #1 had one unstageable pressure ulcer (not stageable due to coverage of wound bed by slough [dead tissue in a wound, typically soft, yellow or white, that can impede healing if not properly managed] and/or eschar [hardened, dry, black or brown dead tissue that forms a scab-like covering over deep wounds]) present upon admission. 2. Staff documented…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medical records were complete and accurate for 1 (R #1 and R #3) of 3 (R #1, R #2, and R #3) residents reviewed accuracy of documentation when staff failed to accurately document the completion of wound care. This deficient practice has the potential to negatively impact the care staff provide to meet residents' needs due to inaccurate records. The findings are: R #1A. Record review of R #1's admission record, no date, revealed she was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #1's physician order, dated 01/15/26, revealed an order for wound care to the right buttocks. Cleanse site with normal saline (NS; solution similar to salt concentration in human blood making it ideal for cleaning wounds) and pat dry, Medihoney (medical grade honey often used in wound dressings) to the wound bed. Cover with calcium alginate gauze (highly absorbent wound dressings designed to manage drainage and promote a moist healing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — widespread
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that nursing staff had the appropriate competencies and skill sets to provide nursing services for all 121 residents that were in the building between 06/25/24-08/23/24 (residents were identified by the Census Report from 06/25/24-08/23/24 provided by the DON 12/11/25) when the facility employed Staff Member (SM) #1 as LPN when she did not have a license or skill set to provide nursing services to residents. This deficient practice could result in residents receiving inappropriate care and interventions for both routine and emergency situations. The findings are: A. Record review of the facility's investigation report dated 08/29/24 revealed R #1 needed to go to the restroom. SM #1 went to assist R #1. R #1 had foley catheter. The urine collection bag was attached to bed. When SM #1 went to assist R #1 she did not take the bag off the bed, and this resulted in R #1 foley catheter tubing to pull on his penis and cause him pain. R #1 was assessed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report allegations of neglect for 1 (R #2) of 121 residents that were in the building between 06/25/24-08/23/24 (residents were identified by the Census Report from 06/25/24-08/23/24 provided by the DON 12/11/25), when they failed to report missed medications and medications left at the bedside of R #2 by Staff Member (SM) #1. If the facility fails to report allegations of neglect, then residents could be subjected to continued neglect resulting in a worsening condition of health and life. The findings are: A. Record review of the facility's investigation report dated 11/03/25 revealed that SM #1 was working at the facility from 06/10/24 to 08/28/24 using false credentials and posing as an LPN. B. Record review of SM #1 disciplinary actions revealed the following: 1. On 07/08/24 Residents have expressed concern regarding a nurse presenting him with medications that he did not recognize as his own. He also stated that she attempted blood sugar checks…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections when they failed to have a water management program to minimize the risk of Legionella [a bacteria that can grow in parts of building water systems that are continually wet (e.g., pipes, faucets, water storage tanks, decorative fountains) and cause a serious type of pneumonia], and other opportunistic pathogens (bacteria that do not usually cause diseases in healthy people but may become extremely injurious to unhealthy individuals) in the building's water system. This failure could potentially affect all (27) residents who live in the facility (residents were identified by the Resident Matrix provided by the Administrator on 01/15/25). If the facility fails to maintain an effective infection control program, then infections could spread to residents throughout the facility, resulting in illness. The findings are: A.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-01-30 · tag F0882 — widespread
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to designate a qualified, trained, or certified Infection Preventionist (IP) who was responsible for the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP.) This failure could affect all 27 residents in the facility (residents were identified by the resident matrix provided by the Administrator on 01/08/24). This deficient practice could likely result in residents being at greater risk of infectious disease. The findings are: A. On 01/29/24 at 3:33 PM, during an interview, the DON stated the following: 1. The IP had some issues with her nursing license. 2. The IP has been on leave due to the issues with her nursing license since 01/10/25. 3. She is now performing IP duties. 4. She is working to obtain her IP certification. B. Record review of the former IP's time sheet, no date, confirmed she last worked at the facility on 01/10/25.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-30 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the resident and the resident's representative(s) of the transfer in writing for 5 (R #184, R #185, R #186, R #187 and R #188) of 6 (R #32, R #184, R #185, R #186, R #187, and R #188) residents sampled for hospitalizations or discharge when staff failed to: 1. Notify the resident and resident's representative(s) of the plan to discharge the resident from the facility in writing and in a language and manner they understand for R #184. 2. Notify the resident and resident's representative(s) of the resident's transfer to the hospital in writing and in a language and manner they understand for R #185, R #186, R #187, and R #188. 3. Include in the discharge or transfer notices a statement of the resident's appeal rights, including the name, address (mailing and email), and telephone number of the entity which receives such requests; and information on how to obtain an appeal form and assistance in completing the form and submitting the appeal hearing request. 4. Include in the transfer or discharge notices the name,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-30 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents, or their representatives received a written notice of the bed hold policy which indicated the duration the bed would be held for 4 (R #185, R #186, R #187, and R #188) of 4 (R #185, R #186, R #187, and R #188) residents reviewed for hospitalization. This deficient practice could likely result in the resident and/or their representative being unaware of the bed hold policy upon return from the hospital. The findings are: R #185 A. Record review of R #185's medical record revealed the following: 1. On 12/27/24, R #185 was sent to the hospital for altered mental status (a change in a person's level of consciousness, awareness, and cognitive function). 2. The record did not contain any documentation of a written bed hold notice. R #186 B. Record review of R #186's medical record revealed the following: 1. On 09/06/24, R #186 was sent to the hospital for gastrointestinal bleeding (bleeding that occurs in the digestive tract). 2. On 09/23/24, R #186 was sent to the hospital for abdominal pain and distention…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-30 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS; a standardized, comprehensive assessment of an adult's functional, medical, psychosocial, and cognitive status) was accurate for 4 (R #4, R #7, R #11, and R #184) of 5 (R #4, R #7, R #8, R #11, and R #184) residents reviewed for accurate MDS assessments. This deficient practice could likely result in the facility not having an accurate assessment of the resident's needs. The findings are: R#4 A. Record review of R #4's admission record revealed R #4 was admitted on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #4's wound care consultation dated 12/25/24 revealed the following: 1. Stage II (shallow, open ulcer with a red-pink wound bed, without slough [non-viable tissue composed of dead cells accumulating on the wound surface. Can appear as a moist, yellow, tan, or white layer and is often fibrous or stringy in texture]) coccyx (tailbone, is a small triangle-shaped bone at the end of the spinal column) pressure ulcer a.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-30 · tag F0655 — pattern
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to create an accurate baseline care plan (minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for a resident immediately upon their admission to the facility) within 48 hours of admission for 3 (R #11, R #184, and #R #185) of 3 (R #11, R #184, and #R #185) residents reviewed for baseline care plans. This deficient practice could likely result in residents not receiving the appropriate care and may place residents at risk of an adverse event (undesirable experience, preventable or non-preventable, that caused harm to a resident because of medical care or lack of medical care) or worsening of current condition after admission. The findings are: R #11 A. Record review of R #11's admission record revealed the following: 1. admission date of 12/27/24. 2. Diagnoses included the following: a. Cellulitis (a common bacterial infection of the skin and underlying tissues) of Left Lower Limb (left leg). b. Cellulitis of Right Lower Limb c. Sepsis (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop an accurate, person-centered comprehensive care plan for 3 (R #7, R #8, and R #184) of 5 (R #4, R #7, R #8, R #184, and R #191) residents reviewed for care plans. This deficient practice could likely result in staff being unaware of the current and actual needs of the residents. The findings are: R #7 A. Record review of R #7's admission record (no date) revealed the following: 1. R #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. 2. Diagnosis: unspecified retinal detachment (serious eye condition where the retina [a light sensitive layer of tissue in the back of the eye] is pulled away from its normal position) with retinal break (when vitreous [clear jelly-like substance that fills the middle of the eye] pulls on the retina and causes a split) of the left eye. B. Record review of R #7's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS, federally mandated process for clinical assessment of all residents in Medicare or Medicaid-certified nursing homes) Assessment,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure care plan requirements were met for 4 (R #4, R #7, R #8, and R #19) of 6 (R #2, R #4, R #7, R #8, R #18, and R #19) residents reviewed for care plans when staff failed to: 1. Have the required Interdisciplinary Team (IDT, team members from different disciplines working collaboratively, with a common purpose, to set goals, make decisions and share resources and responsibilities) members participate in the care plan meeting for R #7, R #8, and R #19. 2. Revise the care plan with the most current resident information for R #4. These deficient practices could likely result in the care plan not being updated with the most current resident conditions and appropriate interventions due to lack of participation of the entire IDT, staff being unaware of changes in care provided, and residents not receiving the care related to changes in their health status or healthcare decisions. The findings are: IDT Team R #7 A. Record review of the Post admission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, and interview the facility failed to keep the residents free from accidents for all 14 residents on the East Unit (Residents were identified by the resident Census provided by the Administrator on 01/14/25), when they failed to keep treatment carts (a movable piece of equipment used in healthcare facilities to store, transport, and dispense treatment supplies and tools) locked when not supervised by staff. This deficient practice could likely result in injury to residents obtaining medical equipment which can cause injury/death:. The findings are: A. On 01/15/25 at 9:12 AM, during an observation of the East Unit, the IV (intravenous, within vein) treatment cart was unlocked and opened, the cart had sterile needles, and intravenous catheters (a thin, flexible tube inserted into a vein to deliver fluids). Staff were not present. B. On 01/15/25 at 9:14 AM, during an interview, RN #8 confirmed the IV treatment cart was unlocked and opened. She said the treatment cart should be locked when not in their sight or control. C. On 01/15/25 at 9:16 AM, during an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to properly store medications, when staff failed to ensure medications were not expired in medication cart for all 14 residents on the East Unit (Residents were identified by the resident matrix provided by the Administrator on 01/15/25). This deficient practice could likely result in residents obtaining medications that are no longer effective, resulting in adverse side effects. The findings are: A. On 01/21/25 at 3:25 PM, an observation of the medication cart on the East Unit revealed fish oil supplement (a supplement used to help reduce pain, improve morning stiffness and relieve joint tenderness in people with rheumatoid arthritis), 1000 mg, expired on 12/2024. B. On 01/21/25 at 3:27 PM, during an interview with RN #16, she confirmed the bottle of Fish Oil 1000 mg was expired and should not have been in the medication cart. C. On 01/21/25 at 3:35 PM, during an interview with the DON, she confirmed expired medications should not be in the medication carts. Nurses should check for expired medications in the medication carts…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-30 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the call light pull cords in resident's rooms were adequately equipped to allow residents to call for help using the call light system for 3 (R #4, R #8, and R #15) of 3 (R #4, R #8, and R #15) when the facility failed to have proper pull cords on the call light system in the resident's rooms when they could not be reached if the resident was not in bed. This deficient practice could likely result in residents being unable to call for assistance. The findings are: R #4 A. 01/15/25 3:48 PM, during an interview, R #4's wife said that R #4 was not cognizant (not having knowledge or being aware of) enough to pull the cord on the call light. R #4 had no other option for the calling for help. R #8 B. On 01/15/25 at 11:01 AM, during an interview and observation of R #8's room revealed a trash bag was tied to the end of the call light. R #8 said that the cord on his call light is too short and he can't reach the call light. R #8 said he didn't know why the trash bag was tied to the cord except to maybe make it longer. R #15…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 2 (R #11 and R #184) of 2 (R #11 and R #184) residents when staff failed to: 1. Implement convalescent care orders (physician's orders that admit a patient to a nursing facility after a hospital stay) for R #11 wounds. 2. Assess R #11's wounds upon admission. 3. Notify the provider when R #184 developed Moisture Associated Skin Damage (MASD, a condition where prolonged exposure to moisture, such as urine, sweat, wound exudate, or saliva, leads to skin damage). Failure to implement convalescent care orders and notify the provider about changes in resident conditions could likely lead to facility staff and the physician being unaware of changes in resident condition and could likely lead to worsening of resident's condition. The findings are: R #11 A. Record review of R #11's admission record revealed the following: 1. admission date of 12/27/24. 2.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure wound care orders were obtained and implemented and wound care was completed for 1 (R #4) of 3 (R #4, R #11, and R #28) residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (damage to an area of the skin caused by constant pressure on the area for a long time). These deficient could likely result in the provider being unaware of the resident's current condition, leading to inconsistent interventions and worsening of pressure ulcers. The findings are: A. Record review of R #4's admission record (no date) revealed R #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of the wound care consultation (outside wound care provider) note dated 12/25/24 revealed the following: 1. Stage II (shallow, open ulcer with a red-pink wound bed, without slough [non-viable tissue composed of dead cells accumulating on the wound surface. Can appear as a moist, yellow, tan, or white layer and is often fibrous or stringy in texture]) coccyx (tailbone, is a small…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a condom catheter (an external urinary device that collects urine from men with urinary incontinence or difficulty urinating) had an order and clinical condition that demonstrated that a condom catheter was necessary for 1 (R #191) of 1 (R #191) residents reviewed for catheter use. This deficient practice could likely result in an increased and unnecessary risk of a urinary tract infection (bacteria in the urinary tract). A. On 01/15/25 at 1:53 PM, during an interview, R #191 said he had a catheter to streamline the process of elimination. R #191 said that he is continent of bowel and bladder. B. On 01/15/25 at 1:54 PM, during an observation of R #191, revealed R #191 had a catheter. C. Record review of R #191's physicians orders revealed R #191 did not have an order for a condom catheter. D. Record review of R #191's medical record revealed the record did not contain any documentation of a clinical condition for the need of a condom catheter. E. On 01/17/25 at 2:30 PM, during an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide respiratory care (health care discipline specializing in the promotion of optimum cardiopulmonary function, health and wellness) that was consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 (R #2) of 1 (R #2) resident sampled for respiratory care when staff failed to change R #2's nasal cannula (medical device to provide supplemental oxygen therapy to through the nose) within 7 days of the previous change. This deficient practice could likely cause the nasal cannula to become obstructed, non-functional, and unsanitary and not provide the resident with the oxygen needed. The findings are: A. On 01/15/25 at 11:03 AM, during an observation of R #2 revealed R #2 had a portable oxygen tank and nasal cannulas. The nasal cannulas were not dated with a date indicating the date they had been changed. B. Record review of R #2's Physicians Orders dated 12/18/24 revealed Oxygen at 2 Liters to be administer via nasal cannula continuously. C. On 01/16/25 at 1:51 PM, during an interview, the DON stated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents did not receive psychotropic medications (antidepressants, anti-anxiety medications, stimulants, antipsychotics, and mood stabilizers) unless the medication was medically necessary for 1 (R #198) of 5 (R #2, R #7, R #19, R #28, and R #198) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. This deficient practice could likely result in residents receiving medications without a medical reason or when the medication is no longer necessary, placing these residents at a higher risk of adverse side effects (unwanted, harmful, or abnormal result). The findings are: A. Record review of R #198's admission record, no date, revealed the following: 1. R #198 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. 2. R #198 had the following diagnoses: a. Cognitive communication deficit (a difficulty with communication caused by an impairment in cognitive processes). b. Other symbolic dysfunctions (language impairments caused by an underlying medical condition). c.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-01 · tag F0660 — pattern
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a care plan on the resident's individualized discharge goals and needs for 3 (R #11, R #12, and R #13) of 3 (R #11, R #12, and R #13) residents reviewed for discharge planning. This deficient practice is likely to prevent a safe transition from the facility to the resident's post-discharge setting. The findings are: A. Record review of R #11's care plan, dated 01/19/24, revealed staff did not care plan R #11's discharge goals and needs. B. Record review of R #12's care plan, dated 03/06/24, revealed staff did not care plan R #12's discharge goals and needs. C. Record review of R #13's care plan, dated 04/01/24, revealed staff did not care plan R #13's discharge goals and needs. D. On 05/01/24 at 2:39 PM, during an interview, Social Services (SS) confirmed she did not document the residents' discharge goals or needs in the care plans. SS confirmed she did not have documentation of the residents' discharge goals or needs in the residents' charts.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-06 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents, their representatives, or the Ombudsman received a written notice of transfer as soon as practicable for 2 (R #19 and R #122) of 2 (R #19, and R #122) residents reviewed for hospitalization. This deficient practice could likely result in the resident and/or their representative not knowing the reason or location the resident was discharged . The findings are: R #19 A. Record review of R #19's medical record revealed the following: 1) R #19 was sent to the hospital on [DATE]. 2) No written transfer notice was found. B. On 11/03/23 at 11:03 AM, during an interview, the Social Services Director confirmed the facility did not provide R #19 a transfer notice. The Social Services Director also confirmed she did not provide the copies of written transfer notices to the ombudsman. R #122 C. Record review of R #122's medical record revealed the following: 1) R #122 was sent to the hospital on [DATE]. 2) No written transfer notice was found. D.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 (R #128) of 2 (R #125 and R #128) residents reviewed for care plans. Failure to develop a person-centered care plan could likely result in staff's failure to understand the needs, preferences, and treatments for residents to achieve their highest level of well-being. The findings are: A. On 10/31/23 at 11:56 AM, during an observation, R #128 had a foley catheter. B. Record review of R #128's care plan, dated 10/31/23, revealed staff did not include R #128's foley catheter in the care plan. C. On 11/02/23 at 2:25 PM, during an interview with the Administrator, she confirmed staff did not include R #128's foley catheter in the resident's care plan, and they should have.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide proper care for pressure ulcers (an injury that breaks down the skin and underlying tissue), for 1 (R #125) of 3 (R #125, R #126, and R #128) residents sampled for pressure ulcers, when they failed to have the prescribed air mattress for R #125. This deficient practice could likely result in the development and/or worsening of pressure ulcers. The findings are: A. Record review of R #125's Skin Assessment, dated 10/27/23, revealed R #125 had a stage 4 pressure ulcer (Full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon, or muscle). B. Record review of R #125's Physician's Orders, dated 10/2/23, revealed an order for a pressure-redistribution mattress (Designed to prevent, treat, and heal pressure ulcers in the home or long term care setting) to bed. C. On 10/31/23 at 11:34 AM, during an interview with R #125, he said he had a pressure ulcer on his buttocks, and it hurt. D. On 10/31/23 at 11:36 AM, during an observation of R #125's room there was no air mattress on his bed. E. On 11/01/23 at 12:42 PM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to keep residents free from accidents for all 10 residents in the East Unit of the facility (residents were identified by the Census Report provided by the Administrator on 10/31/23), when they failed to secure a treatment cart. This deficient practice could likely result in residents obtaining medical equipment that could be harmful to them resulting in injury. The findings are: A. On 10/31/23 at 9:54 AM, an observation of the nurse's station area revealed a treatment cart unlocked. No staff were present. B. On 10/31/23 at 9:56 AM, during an interview, LPN #32 confirmed the treatment cart was unlocked. LPN # 32 also confirmed the expectation was for the treatment cart to be locked when unattended. C. On 11/03/23 at 8:54 AM, an interview with the interim DON confirmed that treatment carts should be locked when nurses do not have line of sight of the cart.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-06 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate treatment and services for Foley catheter (soft plastic or rubber tube that is inserted to the bladder to drain the urine and is connected to a collecting bag) care for 1 (R #128) of 2 (R #128 and R #126) residents sampled for urinary catheter, when they failed to: 1. Keep R #128's Foley catheter tubing and collecting bag off the floor, and 2. Have a current order for R #128's Foley catheter. This deficient practice could likely result in residents getting infections and having the Foley catheter longer than needed. The findings are: A. On 10/31/23 at 11:56 AM, during an observation, R #128's catheter tubing and collecting bag was on the floor while he sat in his wheelchair. B. On 10/31/23 at 11:59 AM, during an interview, LPN #31 confirmed R #128's foley tubing and collection bag was on the floor. She also confirmed they should not be on the floor. C. On 11/02/23 at 9:41 AM, during an interview, the Administrator confirmed the catheter tubing and collection bags should not be on the floor.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-06 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that nursing staff demonstrated competency in skills and techniques necessary to weigh residents safely and correctly for 3 (CNA #4, CNA #5, and CNA #6) of 3 (CNA #4, CNA #5, and CNA #6) employees sampled for training. This deficient practice could likely result in staff working who are not competent to weigh residents. The findings are: A. On 11/03/23 at 11:59 AM, during an interview with the Dietician, he confirmed he had concerns about resident weights being accurate. The Dietician stated he had informed the facility of the concerns. The Dietician stated that if there was a question on the weights then he would request for a re-weigh to confirm. B. Record review of employee files revealed the following: 1. No competency for weighing residents for CNA #4. 2. No competency for weighing residents for CNA #5. 3. No competency for weighing residents for CNA #6. C. On 11/03/23 at 3:07 PM, during an interview, the Executive Director confirmed the facility had not done competencies or training for staff regarding…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-06 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete performance reviews at least every 12 months for 3 (CNA #4, CNA #5, and CNA #6) of 3 (CNA #4, CNA #5, and CNA #6) CNAs sampled for 12 hours of annual training. This deficient practice could likely result in staff being undertrained and providing inadequate care. The findings are: A. Record review of employee files revealed the following: 1. No performance evaluations for CNA #4. 2. No performance evaluations for CNA #5. 3. No performance evaluations for CNA #6. B. On 11/03/23 at 12:38 PM, during an interview, the Executive Director confirmed the facility had not done the performance evaluations for CNA #4, CNA #5, and CNA #6.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to properly store medications in the medication storage room for all 19 residents (residents were identified by the resident matrix provided by the Administrator on [DATE]) that were randomly sampled, when they failed to dispose of expired Shingrix (A zoster vaccine is a vaccine that reduces the incidence of herpes zoster, a disease caused by reactivation of the varicella zoster virus, which is also responsible for chickenpox) in the medication refrigerator. This deficient practice could result in residents obtaining vaccinations that are expired resulting in adverse side effects. The findings are: A. On [DATE] at 10:53 AM, during an observation, the medication storage room refrigerator revealed eight vials of Shingrix with an expiration date of [DATE]. B. On [DATE] at 10:53 AM, during an interview, the ADON confirmed the eight vials of Shingrix were expired. The ADON confirmed staff should have discarded the expired Shingrix.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store and serve food under sanitary conditions in accordance with professional standards of food service safety for 18 residents that eat food prepared in the kitchen in the facility (residents were identified on the resident matrix provided by the Administrator on 10/31/23), when they failed to: 1. Keep the dry storage area floors clean, 2. Ensure that spices in the kitchen were labeled and dated, 3. Stored a plunger in the dry storage area. If the facility fails to adhere to safe food handling practices, hygiene practices, and safe food storage, residents could likely to be exposed to foodborne illnesses (illness caused by food contaminated with bacteria, viruses, parasites, or toxins). The findings are: A. On 10/31/23 at 10:18 AM, an observation of the main kitchen revealed: 1. There was dark liquid on the floor in the dry storage area. 2. There was a plunger that looked dirty and dusty next to the door in the dry storage area. There was a box of bananas next to this door. B. On 11/03/23 at 10:36 AM, during an observation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-06 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure there was a functioning call light system that allowed residents to call for assistance for 2 (R #126 and R #173) of 3 (R #126, R #127 and R #173) residents reviewed for call lights. If the facility does not have a functioning call light system then residents are unlikely to get their immediate needs met by facility staff. The findings are: A. On 10/31/23 at 3:10 PM, during an interview with R #126, he said he did not have a call light. B. On 10/31/23 at 3:11 PM, an observation of R #126's room revealed his room did not have a call light, and wires stuck out from the wall where the call light used to be. C. On 10/31/23 at 3:12 PM during interview, LPN #11 confirmed a call light was not attached to the wall of R #126's room, and the light had not worked for at least a year. She further stated the call lights in room [ROOM NUMBER] A and B did not work. D. On 10/31/23 at 3:14, during observation of R #73's call light, the light did not function when…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-06 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a written Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) to 1 (R #24) of 3 (R #22, R #23, and R #24) residents sampled for beneficiary notices. If residents are not provided with the beneficiary notices, then they may not make an informed decision about the services provided to them and could likely result in a decline in health and function. The findings are: A. Record review of R #24's medical record revealed R #24 was discharged from the facility on 09/25/23. B. Record review of the NOMNC dated 09/22/23 revealed the NOMNC delivered telephonically not written. C. On 11/03/23 at 12:15 PM, during an interview, the Administrator in Training confirmed the facility did not provide a written NOMNC to R #24 or their respresentative.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-06 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to have the physician document the required discharge information in the resident's medical records for 1 (R #122) of 1 (R #122) residents reviewed for facility discharges. This deficient practice could likely cause an unsafe discharge due to a lack of information or documentation. The findings are: A. Record review of R #122's face sheet revealed R #122 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 05/23/23. B. Record review of R #122's Nursing Progress Notes, dated 05/23/23, revealed R #122 became verbally and physically abusive to his wife (who was a resident at the facility). The Nurse Practitioner ordered R #122 be sent out for further evaluation and better placement. R #122 was transported to a local hospital. C. Record review of R #122's medical record revealed the record did not contain documentation of the following: 1. Orders from the Physician, 2. Basis for transfer, 3. The needs that the facility was not able to meet and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-06 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents or their representatives received a written notice of their bed hold policy indicating the duration the bed would be held for 1 (R #19) of 1 (R #19) residents reviewed for hospitalization. This deficient practice could likely result in the resident and/or their representative being unaware of the bed hold policy upon return from the hospital. The findings are: A. Record review of R #19's medical record revealed the following: 1) R #19 was sent to the hospital on [DATE]. 2) No written bed hold policy was found. B. On 11/03/23 at 8:39 AM, during an interview, the Business Office Manager (BOM) confirmed R #19 was not given a bed hold policy. The BOM stated she called the resident or representative, and if they elected to pay for the bed hold then they will gave them a copy of the policy.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-06 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to create a Baseline Care Plan that accurately reflected the resident's current condition for 1 (R #175) of 2 (R #5 and R #175) residents sampled for falls. This deficient practice could likely result in residents not receiving the appropriate care and services and may place residents at risk of an adverse event (An event, preventable or nonpreventable, that caused harm to a patient as a result of medical care or lack of medical care) or worsening of current condition after admission. The findings are: A. Record review of R #175's admission Record, (no date), revealed R #175 was admitted on [DATE]. B. Record review of R # 175's baseline care plan, (no date), revealed R #175: 1. Received physical therapy (PT), occupational therapy (OT), and speech and language pathology (SLP). 2. Was independent (no assistance needed) for bed mobility, transfer, walking, toileting, locomotion, eating, grooming/hygiene, and bathing. C. Record review of R #175's nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-06 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure there was a system in place for the nursing staff to immediately determine code status [the residents choice as to whether or not they would like to be provided cardio- pulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in the event that they stopped breathing and/or their heart stopped] for 1 (R #128) of 3 (R #122, R #125, and R #127) residents reviewed for code status, when they failed immediately know R #128 would like CPR in an emergency. This deficient practice is likely to delay potentially lifesaving measures if staff are not immediately aware of residents' preferences for resuscitation. The findings are: A. On [DATE] at 08:49 AM, during an interview with R #128 he stated he had not been asked his preference for resuscitation. B. On [DATE] at 08:47 AM, during an interview, the Administrator confirmed R #128's code status was not documented in R #128's medical record. She stated the code status should have been obtained upon admission and documented in R…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-06 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the enteral tube feeding [a device utilized to provide liquid nutrition and medications via a tube into the stomach or intestine] was administered per physician's orders for 1 (R #125) of 1 (R #125) resident reviewed for tube feeding when they failed to continuously administer R #125's feeding. This deficient practice could likely lead to malnutrition and weight loss. The findings are: A. On 10/31/23 at 11:34 AM, during an interview with R #125, he stated he did not know if the feeding tube was attached to the pump, tube, and bag or not. B. On 10/31/23 at 11:35 AM, an observation of R #125 revealed R #125's feeding pump, tube, and bag was not connected to him. C. On 10/31/23 at 12:05 PM, an observation of R #125 revealed R #125's feeding pump, tube, and bag was not connected to him. D. Record review of R #125's Physicians Orders, dated 10/26/23, revealed R #125 to receive tube feeding continuously throughout the day. E. On 11/02/23 at 3:51 PM, during an interview with the Administrator, she stated if…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-06 · tag F0741 — failed to have staff trained for behavioral health — isolated
    Ensure that the facility has sufficient staff members who possess the competencies and skills to meet the behavioral health needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that staff received the appropriate training and skills to provide services for 1 (R #25) of 1 (R #25) resident reviewed. This deficient practice is likely to result in residents not getting the care and assistance they need. The findings are: A. Record review of the Incident Report, dated 06/01/23. revealed R #25 had altercation with CNA #20 after a fall at his bed side. R #25 strangled CNA #20 during the incident. B. Record review of the Initial Report to the State Agency, dated 06/06/23, revealed R #25 had an altercation with staff. CNA #20 had to seek medical attention after being attacked, and other staff were injured during the incident as well. C. Record Review of R #25's Nursing Progress Notes revealed the following: 1. 05/20/23 Pt (patient). is experiencing agitation/restlessness. Pt. is experiencing anxiety about surroundings. Pt. is experiencing impulsive behavior. Pt. is experiencing patient yells [sic] and screams, he can be physically agressive [sic] with grabbing and hitting. Pt has had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-06 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of any significant medication errors for 1 (R #179) of 3 (R #123, R #124, and R #179) residents reviewed for medication administration when they failed to administer medication per physician's orders. This deficient practice could likely lead to the residents having adverse (unwanted, harmful, or abnormal result) side effects, or not receiving the desired therapeutic effect of the medication. The findings are: A. Record review of R #179's Physician's orders revealed: 1. Start date 10/07/23. End date 10/13/23. Metoprolol succinate [medication is a beta-blocker used to treat chest pain (angina), heart failure, and high blood pressure, one missed dose of this medication can have significant adverse effects] ER (extended release), oral tablet, extended release 24 hour, 50 MG (milligram, dose of medication). 2. Start date 10/14/23. End Date 10/22/23. Metoprolol succinate ER, oral tablet, extended release 24 hour, Give 50 MG by mouth two times a day for HTN (high blood pressure). 3. Start Date…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2025-01-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — widespread
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to report the results of all of the investigations of alleged medication diversion (the transfer of any legally prescribed controlled substance from the individual for whom it was prescribed to another person for any illicit use) and injuries of unknown origin within five days of the incident to the State Agency. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all 27 residents in the facility. If the facility fails to report the results of the investigations to the State Agency within five days, then corrective action may not be taken and medications may not be available to residents during an emergency and/or residents may suffer serious bodily injury due to injuries of unknown origin. The findings are: Injury of Unknown Origin R #200 A. Record review of the initial incident report, dated 08/20/24, revealed the following: 1. R #200 was sent to the emergency room due to a nose bleed (no date). 2. R #200 was found to have rib fractures and a compression fracture of her Thoracic 10 vertebrae (bone in the back). 3. Family was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2025-01-30 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to post nurse staffing data on a daily basis that included the following: 1. The total number and the actual hours worked by the following categories of licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift to include: a. Registered nurses. b. Licensed practical nurses. c. Certified nurse aides. This deficient practice could likely result in residents not knowing which staff is working. The findings are: A. On 01/30/25 at 3:29 PM, during an observation of the facility, revealed the nurse staffing data posted at the front entrance of the facility did not include the total number of actual nursing staff scheduled and actual hours worked by nursing staff for the day. B. On 01/30/25 at 4:15 PM, during an interview, the DON confirmed the night shift nurse is responsible for posting the nurse staffing data and it should include the total number of staff scheduled for each shift and the number of hours that each nursing staff is scheduled to work.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to OPCO SKILLED MANAGEMENT — 66 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.2-0.2 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 51.7+1.3 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 54.3-1.3 vs chain
The other 65 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
1 of 5Bluebird Wellness And RehabilitationSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Brentwood Place ThreeDallas, TX 1 of 5Broadway Nursing & RehabilitationSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5Cameron Nursing CenterCameron, MO 1 of 5Carmel Hills Wellness & RehabilitationIndependence, MO 1 of 5Casa Arena Healthcare LLCAlamogordo, NM 1 of 5Casa Maria HealthcareRoswell, NM 1 of 5Forest Park Nursing & RehabilitationDallas, TX 1 of 5Fort Worth Wellness & RehabilitationFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Glenview Wellness & RehabilitationNorth Richland Hills, TX 1 of 5Highland Pines Nursing HomeLongview, TX 1 of 5Ivy Creek Wellness & RehabilitationWaco, TX 1 of 5Las Cruces Village Nursing & Rehabilitation LLCLas Cruces, NM 1 of 5Magnolia Wellness CenterSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Maple Grove Wellness & RehabilitationFenton, MO 1 of 5Mineola Gardens Wellness & RehabilitationMineola, TX 1 of 5Pine Grove ManorSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Rehab Of Kansas City SouthKansas City, MO 1 of 5The Hillcrest Of North DallasDallas, TX 1 of 5West Side Campus Of CareWhite Settlement, TX 1 of 5Willow Ridge Wellness & RehabilitationFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Willowcreek Wellness & RehabilitationFlorissant, MO 2 of 5Arbor Lake Nursing & Rehabilitation, LLCFort Worth, TX 2 of 5Aztec HealthcareAztec, NM 2 of 5Betty Dare Wellness & Rehabilitation LLCAlamogordo, NM 2 of 5Blue Springs Wellness & RehabilitationBlue Springs, MO 2 of 5Cypress Springs Wellness & RehabilitationMount Vernon, TX 2 of 5Fiesta Park Wellness & RehabilitationAlbuquerque, NM 2 of 5Hilltop At Blue River, TheKansas City, MO 2 of 5La Vida Buena HealthcareLas Vegas, NM 2 of 5Los Alamos Wellness & RehabilitationLos Alamos, NM 2 of 5McGregor Wellness & RehabilitationMc Gregor, TX 2 of 5Monarch Springs Wellness & RehabilitationUniversity City, MO 2 of 5Prescott Valley Nursing & RehabilitationPrescott Valley, AZ 2 of 5Prescott Village Nursing & RehabilitationPrescott, AZ 2 of 5Rehabilitation Center Of Independence, TheIndependence, MO 2 of 5San Antonio Wellness & RehabilitationSan Antonio, TX 2 of 5Skyline Nursing CenterDallas, TX 2 of 5Sunny Springs Nursing & RehabSulphur Springs, TX 2 of 5White Acres Wellness & RehabilitationEl Paso, TX

Showing 40 of 65; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
NORTHRISE HEALTHCARE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 12/01/2025
NORTHRISE ADVISORS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/01/2025
NR RUNNER TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/01/2025
FIRST SWEETZER HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/01/2025
SASEM INVESTMENTS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/01/2025
GARETZ, DAVIDIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/01/2025
KAPLAN, ESTHERIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/01/2025
SLAUGHTER, MICHAELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2025
STOLARCZYK, LISAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2025
DAVIDOVICH, NIVIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/06/2025
GURWITZ, SOLOMONIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/06/2025
HAGINS, ELIZABETHIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/06/2025
MINDLE, ADAMIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/06/2025
STERNSHEIN, JENNIFERIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/06/2025
2884 N ROADRUNNER PKWY NM LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2025
NR REALTY ADVISORS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2025
NR REALTY INVESTORS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2025
OPCO CA SKILLED MGMT INC.OrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2025
OPCO NM SKILLED MGMT, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2025
ROADRUNNER REALTY TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

11 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-4.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$651K
Related-party expense6% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 0%Medicare 6%Other / private 94%

This home reported $651K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$176per resident / day
operating cost
$5,349per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$168per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NM

Paying with Medicaid

CMS lists this home as Medicare-certified only — it is not Medicaid-certified, so it generally cannot accept Medicaid as payment for a long-term stay. That makes it one of roughly 545 homes nationally where a Medicaid-funded placement is not an option. If you expect to rely on Medicaid, ask the home directly before you tour, and see the New Mexico Medicaid page for homes that do.

Typical monthly cost in New Mexico
$9,125/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,633/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,950/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 325111. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-06, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next