Brentwood Place Three

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 28% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 23% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 99.6 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 20 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.58 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.32 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.64 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.24 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.71 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.32 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-02-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for elopement. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was adequately supervised when Resident #1 left the faciity on [DATE] and climbed through the fence and walked blocks away from the facility. Resident #1 contacted 911 and was transported to a nearby hospital. Resident #1 was located at a nearby hospital after the previous SW had called around to the closest hospital trying to find Resident #1. Staff did not know what time he left but were aware of his exit-seeking behavior and previous elopement attempt from the facility.An IJ was identified on 02/05/2026. The IJ template was provided to the ADM on 02/05/2026 at 11:29 A.M. While Resident #1 no longer resided at the facility, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and severity of no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that was not immediate. The IJ…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure in accordance with applicable state and federal requirements: fire, alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours if the alleged violation involved abuse or neglect and resulted in bodily injury, to other officials (including the state Agency) and the administrator of the facility for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for reporting abuse, in that: The Administrator (Abuse preventionist) and the DON failed to follow the facility's abuse policy by not reporting Resident #1's phone catching on fire while he was in his bed on 05/28/26 to HHS. This failure could place residents at risk for abuse and neglect.Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 06/03/26, reflected an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with an initial admission date of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-19 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the Resident Council group a private space for monthly resident council meetings for the facility's only resident council, for 18 of 18 confidential residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure resident council meetings were held in a private meeting space during their monthly scheduled March Resident Council meeting, when staff continued to enter the dining room while the resident council meeting was being held. This failure could place residents at risk of not being able to fully exercise their rights in the facility, which could lead to a lack of trust for staff working in their living environment, and emotional distress.Findings included: An observation of the Resident Council meeting, on 03/17/26 from 2:00 PM to 3:05 PM, revealed a group of eighteen residents were gathered to meet in the facility's dining room. During the meeting, several residents left (exact times unknown), leaving fourteen active participants in the meeting. The room was a large, open space, with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety in the facility's only kitchen reviewed for food safety.1. The facility failed to ensure the stand-by freezer food items were dated and labeled.2. The facility failed to ensure the stand-by refrigerator food items were dated, labeled, and sealed.3. The facility failed to ensure that serving utensils were used when handling food items.These failures could place residents at risk for foodborne illness and foodborne intoxication.Findings included:During an observation on 03/17/2026 at 8:48 a.m. of the facility's only kitchen revealed:In the stand-by freezer:a package of food with the name covered, dated 4/11/26In the stand-by refrigerator:a used bag of shredded cheese, with no label or datea used bag of hard-boiled eggs, dated 03/16/26 with no use by date During an interview on 03/17/2026 at 8:59 a.m., the Dietary Manager revealed the frozen freezer item was minestrone soup and the date was supposed to read…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to respect and value resident's dignified existence for 1 of 6 halls (hall 300) reviewed for resident rights.The CNA failed to knock on residents' doors and introduce themself before entering the room for 4 of 10 rooms on 300 hall.This failure could please residents at risk for a negative psychosocial outcome and impact overall quality of life for residents.Findings included:During an observation on 03/18/2026 at 5:41 a.m. revealed CNA C and CNA D were doing rounds prior to shift change. CNA C was seen walking into 4 of 10 resident rooms on hall 300, without knocking or introducing herself.During an interview on 03/18/2026 at 5:44 a.m., CNA C revealed she was supposed to knock on residents' doors, say her name, and what she was there for before entering the residents' rooms. She said she had just provided ice to residents and was doing rounds one more time before leaving. CNA C indicated it was important to knock and greet residents before entering because residents need to be aware when staff were entering…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident's right to personal privacy and confidentiality of personal records for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for resident rights.The facility failed to protect Resident #1's confidential record by placing the resident's pharmacy receipt on top of a treatment cart which was sitting in hall 100 unattended. This failure could place residents at risk of their confidential information exposed to unauthorized personnel.Findings included:During an observation on 3/17/2026 at 8:45 a.m. revealed an unoccupied treatment cart in hall 100. On top of the treatment cart was Resident #1's pharmacy receipt for morphine. The receipt included Resident#1's name, date of birth , medication name (morphine), and the dosage of medication. During an interview on 3/17/2026 at 8:50 a.m., LVN A stated Resident #1 was discharged yesterday. He stated there should not be resident information in open areas because of HIPAA violation. He stated the residents had the right for their information to be kept…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision 1 of 1 (Resident #2) residents reviewed for microwave use.The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 was not alone in the staff conference room using the microwave to warm up his coffee. This failure could place residents at risk of burning themselves when trying to consume microwaved food and beverages.Findings included:Record review of Resident #2's face sheet, dated 03/18/2026, revealed a [AGE] year-old man admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of an infection following a (surgical) procedure.Record review of Resident #2's MDS, dated [DATE] revealed he had a BIMS of 15.Record review of Resident #2's care plan, dated 03/11/2026, revealed he was a risk for falls related to gait/balance problems (walking and balance problems) and had ADL self-care performance deficit related to post right knee arthroplasty (surgery to replace or repair knee). Interventions included…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store drugs and biologicals in locked compartment for 1 of 4 carts reviewed for medication and biological storage.The facility failed to ensure a bottle of wound cleaner was not sitting on the side of an unoccupied cart in hall 100.This failure could place residents at risk of adverse reaction and injury. Findings included:During an observation on 3/17/2026 at 8:45 a.m., an unoccupied treatment cart in hall 100 was locked with a bottle of wound cleanser exposed on the side of the treatment cart. The wound cleanser bottle was half empty. There was residents present in hall 100 at the time of observation. During an interview on 3/17/2026 at 8:50 a.m., LVN A stated he was not sure who was using the treatment cart because the cart was shared amongst the nurses. He stated all drugs and biologicals should be stored inside a locked cart to prevent injuries or adverse reactions to residents if they got ahold of biologicals. During an interview on 3/17/2026 at 9:00 a.m., the treatment nurse stated the treatment cart…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-06 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of changes for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for elopement behaviors. The facility failed to inform the MD of Resident #1's elopement behaviors when requesting to discontinue his medical diagnosis of dementia.The failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the necessary care and treatment to meet their physical, mental, and psychosocial needs.Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 02/04/2026, reflected a [AGE] year-old male, admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 12/02/2025. Resident #1 diagnoses included cerebral infarction (blood clot forms in artery, disrupting blood flow to the brain, resulting in stroke) and osteoarthritis (protective cushion at ends of bones wear down, leading to stiffness and pain). Further record review of Resident #1's medical diagnoses revealed on 11/27/2025, the RNC had struck out the primary diagnosis dementia. The diagnosis did not appear on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-06 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure alleged violations of neglect were immediately reported to the State Agency within 24 hours for 1 of 5 (Resident #1) reviewed for elopement reporting. The facility failed to report Resident #1's subsequent and actual elopements from the facility on 11/02/2025 and 11/26/2025.This failure could place residents at risk of neglect and lack of oversight by the State Agency.Findings included:Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 02/04/2026, reflected a [AGE] year-old male, admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 12/02/2025. Resident #1 diagnoses included cerebral infarction (blood clot forms in artery, disrupting blood flow to the brain, resulting in stroke) and osteoarthritis (protective cushion at ends of bones wear down, leading to stiffness and pain). Further record review of Resident #1's medical diagnoses revealed on 11/27/2025, the RNC had struck out the primary diagnosis dementia. The diagnosis did not appear on the face sheet. Record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that included measurable objectives to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to develop and implement the care plan for Resident #1's risk of elopement since his initial elopement attempt on 10/24/2025 and subsequent elopement attempt and actual elopement on 11/02/2025 and 11/26/2025.The facility failed to revise the care plan for Resident #1 to reflect his medical diagnosis of dementia.This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving proper care and services. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 02/04/2026, reflected a [AGE] year-old male, admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 12/02/2025. Resident #1 diagnoses included cerebral infarction (blood clot forms in artery, disrupting blood flow…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,281 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,281 — penalty dated 2026-02-06

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to OPCO SKILLED MANAGEMENT — 66 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 81% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX