No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Hilltop At Blue River, The

10425 Chestnut Dr, Kansas City, MO 64137 · For profit - Corporation · 160 certified beds · (816) 763-4444 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (816) 763-4444 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited May 2026Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0740, F0744, F0758)2 actual-harm citations
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2026
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (48) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • about 23% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
701 E 101st Ter · (816) 523-0100 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1001 E 101st Ter Ste 240 · (816) 941-0554 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
9512 Blue Ridge · (816) 761-6660 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Place of worship
10415 Chestnut Dr · (816) 761-4342

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased7.5%18.1%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight11.9%5.3%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%1.1%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.6%2.3%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms14.9%18.5%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%4.1%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened7.4%17.4%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication18.9%25.6%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine62.3%90.9%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.6%4.5%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control26.4%17.8%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table16.5%23.5%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.9%2.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine31.7%63.5%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission17.7%26.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit7.0%13.7%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.532.111.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.812.331.80typical

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

37.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 25 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

37.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
65.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.17U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.09hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 65.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 32 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 16% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF37.8%CMS range 26.3–56.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.3%CMS range 6.8–14.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge65.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge50.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge53.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified72.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.5%CMS range 3.3–11.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.911.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.25
RN hours/ resident / day
0.47
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.89
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.62
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.23
RN hoursweekends
37.9%
Total nursing turnover
20.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 160 beds and averages 147.0 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.62 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.25 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.89 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.33 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.73 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.26 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-03-14)
28
at the previous standard inspection (2023-07-21)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

48 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 36 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-07-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to put measures in place to prevent further injury following an incident in which one sampled resident (Resident #120) out of 27 sampled residents knocked over a large, heavy metal activity cabinet, resulting in the resident sustaining a fractured wrist. The facility also failed to complete a smoking assessment and care plan for one sampled resident (Resident #15) who smoked cigarettes to ensure a safe smoking plan out of 27 sampled residents. The facility census was 125 residents. Review of the facility's Accidents and Incidents - Investigating and Reporting policy statement, undated showed: -All accidents and incidents involving residents, employees, visitors, vendors, etc, occurring on the premises shall be investigated and reported to the administrator. -The nurse supervisor/charge nurse or the department director or supervisor shall promptly initiate and document investigation of accidents and incidents. -The nurse supervisor/charge…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-07-21 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to monitor weights upon admission for one sampled resident (Resident #10) who had a significant weight loss of 28 pounds, a 13.96% loss in 3 1/2 weeks, to notify the resident's physician of the Registered Dietician's (RD) recommendations in a timely manner so the recommendations could be implemented before the resident's weight loss became significant, and to have an individualized comprehensive dietary care plan; to monitor and record weights and notify the resident's physician in a timely manner for one sampled resident (Resident #11) with a gradual significant weight loss; and to ensure hydration opportunities and assistance were provided to three sampled residents (Residents #6, #120, and #104) who were dependent upon staff for their hydration needs out of 27 sampled residents. The facility census was 125 residents. Review of the facilities Nutrition/hydration Management policy and procedure, not dated, showed: -Each resident maintains…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent physical abuse for one sampled resident (Resident #1) out of four sampled residents. On 4/26/26 at approximately 11:00 A.M. Resident #2 who has a history of being physically aggressive to residents and staff, struck Resident #1 on the head with a chair resulting in a red and raised area on his/her head and a small scratch on the bridge of his/her nose which required first aid. The facility census was 143 residents.The Administrator was notified on 5/1/26 of Past Non-Compliance which occurred on 4/26/26. An all-staff in-service on Abuse and Neglect and Resident's Rights. Both residents were also set up for additional psychiatric services and therapy. The deficiency was corrected by 4/27/26. Review of the facility policy for Abuse and Neglect revised 8/2020 showed:-The purpose of the policy was to establish a program to prevent resident mistreatment and abuse.-The facility was committed to keeping all residents safe from abuse while…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-02 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain the dignity of one sampled resident when on 12/19/25 Certified Medication Aide A forced Resident #2 to get out of bed against his/her will out of six sampled residents. The facility census was 143 residents. The Administrator was notified on 1/2/26 of the past noncompliance which began on 12/19/25. The facility immediately completed education for the violation of residents' rights and choices. The deficiency was corrected on 12/20/25. Review of the facility's policy entitled Resident Rights and revised on 8/20, showed:-Purpose: To promote and protect the rights of all residents at the facility.-Policy: All residents have a right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside of the facility including those specified in this policy.- The facility must treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment, that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0551 — isolated
    Give the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one sampled resident's (Resident #3) representative/power of attorney was able to exercise his/her rights to make financial decisions on behalf of the resident out of four sampled residents. The facility census was 145 residents. Review of the facility Resident Rights Policy dated 8/2020 showed: -Promote and protect the rights of all residents at the facility. -All residents have a right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside the facility including those specified in the policy. -The facility will ensure that the resident can exercise his or her rights without interference, coercion, discrimination, or reprisal from the facility. -State and federal laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of the facility including but not limited to: --Visit and be visited by others from outside the facility. --Use a telephone in privacy. --Treat the decisions of a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-14 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have sufficient staff on the weekends to provide care and services for residents and for one sampled resident (Resident #10) out of 29 sampled residents. The facility census was 140 residents. Review of the facility's policy, Staffing, Scheduling, and Posting, dated 06/2020 showed: -Staffing an adequate number of nursing service personnel, scheduling would have been done as needed to met the residents' needs and would have accounted for the number, acuity and diagnoses of the facility resident populations. -The facility would have submitted to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS - a federal agency that administers programs along with other health related initiatives) complete and accurate direct care staffing information based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data in a uniform format according to specifications established by CMS. -The Director of Nursing (DON) or designee was responsible for validating the accuracy of data…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-14 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to use the liquid to maintain the nutritive value of pureed carrots and pureed chicken for residents who received pureed diets. This deficient practice potentially affected residents who received pureed diets. The facility also failed to ensure the temperature of carrots and ham was maintained throughout the meal service for residents who consumed food out of the kitchen. The facility census was 140 residents. Review of the facility's Therapeutic Diet policy and procedure dated 12/2020, showed the purpose was to ensure that the facility provided therapeutic diets to residents that meet nutritional guidelines and physician orders. It showed: -The Nutrition Service Manager was responsible for ensuring the correct type and amount of food is purchased to meet the needs of residents receiving therapeutic diets. -The Nutrition Services Manager was responsible for ensuring each food item is pureed and served separately for a pureed diet per the menu and recipe. Review of the facility Food Temperatures policy and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure kitchen was kept clean and kitchen devices were free from caked on grease, soil and food debris. This deficient practice potentially affected all residents who ate out of the kitchen. The facility census was 140 residents. 1. Observation on 3/12/25 at 10:21 A.M., showed: -The dishwasher had yellowish, dried on food debris on outside of washer. -The tray containing covered bowls of dry cereal on the prep table in front of the oven showed spilled cereal debris on and around the tray and floor. -The toaster on top of the prep table had dried food debris and grease on the outside of the toaster. The mechanical parts inside the toaster had food debris that was caked on the roller mechanism. -The convection oven had baked on grease and debris on the knobs, panel front and sides of the oven and there was dark brown and black, thick, greasy debris on the top of the oven and backsplash. -The well cookers (two) showed the outside of the right cooker was soiled with dried food debris. -The floor throughout the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a facility transfer/discharge notice was completed in detail and provided to the resident and the resident's responsible party for one closed record sampled resident (Resident #142) out of three closed record sampled residents. The facility census was 140 residents. Review of the facility Transfer and Discharge policy and procedure, revised dated 6/2020 showed: -The purpose is to provide the residents with reasonable advance notice of the transfer or discharge before it occurs if possible. -Documentation of written or telephone acknowledgment of the resident ' s transfer by the residents personal representative may occur after the transfer in emergency situations. -The facility may use Notice of Transfer/Discharge or another comparable form to provide the resident of his/her personal representative with advance notice of the transfer or discharge. The notice will include the following information: --The reason the resident is being…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a bed hold agreement was completed in detail and provided to the resident and resident's responsible party for one closed record sampled resident (Resident #142) out of three closed record sampled residents. The facility census was 140 residents. Review of the facility bed hold policy and procedure, revised dated 6/2020 showed: -The purpose was to advise residents or his/her representatives in writing that the facility has a bed hold policy and will hold the resident's bed for the state specified period, if the resident is transferred to a general acute care hospital, as long as the resident or their representative notifies the facility within 24 hours of the transfer that they wish to have the facility hold the bed. -The facility notifies the resident or his/her representative, in writing, of the bed hold policy anytime the resident is transferred to general acute care hospital. -When the resident or their representative provides notice within…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an individualized activity plan that was goal directed and incorporated the interest and ability of two sampled residents with dementia (Resident #22 and #90) out of 29 sampled residents. The facility census was 140 residents. Record review of the facility Activity policy and procedure dated 6/2020, showed: -The purpose was to encourage residents to participate in activities to make life more meaningful, to stimulate and support physical and mental capabilities to the fullest extent, and to enable the resident to maintain the highest attainable social, physical and emotional functioning. -The facility provides and activity program designed to meet the needs, interests and preferences of residents. -The activities are varied and work to address the needs and interests identified through the assessment process. -Activities are developed for individual, small group and large group participation. -The interdisciplinary team evaluates…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one sampled resident(Resident #104) did not keep smoking materials including cigarettes and a lighter in his/her room, and failed to ensure the resident was only smoking in the smoke area not in his/her room; and failed to ensure to protective oversite and supervision to maintain a safe environment during smoking breaks, and to failed ensure resident assigned smoking area was free of potential hazards including wood, nails and broken equipment for one sampled resident (Resident #103) out of 29 sampled residents. The facility census was 140 residents. Review of the facility's policy, Smoking by Residents, dated November 2023 showed: -Smoking was not allowed anywhere inside the facility. -The facility permits smoking only in the areas designated by the facility's Safety Committee. -The facility discourages smoking by residents and ensures that those resident who choose to smoke did so safely. -Residents who wanted to smoke would have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 36 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to serve the physician ordered texture and portion size to one sampled resident (Resident #22) with swallowing difficulties and who was at risk for weight loss out of 29 sampled residents. The facility census was 140 residents. Review of the facility's Therapeutic Diet policy and procedure dated 12/2020, showed: -The purpose was to ensure that the facility provided therapeutic diets to residents that meet nutritional guidelines and physician orders. -Therapeutic diets would not be given without a physician's order. -The therapeutic diet would be reflected on the resident's diet tray card. -The Nutrition Services Manager was responsible for ensuring each food item was pureed and served separately for a pureed diet per the menu and recipe and food portions are equal to the written portion sizes. -The Nutrition Services Manager would periodically review the resident's tray card and the physician's nutrition orders to ensure the information is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a nebulizer (a machine that turns liquid medicine into a mist that could have been easily inhaled) was available for respiratory treatments for one sampled resident, (Resident #10); failed to ensure the Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP a machine that delivers enough air pressure to a mask to keep the upper airway passages open during sleep) mask was correctly placed for one sampled resident, (Resident # 126) and failed to ensure oxygen equipment was stored in a sanitary manner for two sampled residents, (Resident #68 and Resident #126) out of 29 sampled residents. The facility census was 140 residents. Review of the facility's policy, Oxygen Administration, dated 6/2020 showed: -A physician's order was required to intiate oxygen therapy. -All oxygen tubing, humidifiers (a container for distilled water), masks, and cannulas (oxygen tubing) used to deliver oxygen would have been changed weekly and when visibly soiled.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-14 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one sampled resident (Resident # 12) had received dental care out of 29 sampled residents. The facility census was 140 residents. Review of the facility's undated policy, Dental Services, showed: -All residents would receive appropriate oral cares if applicable on a daily basis. -It was the responsibility of each staff member within the nursing department to have ensured good oral care for each resident. -Assessment of the oral cavity and teeth was to have been performed upon admission and as necessary. -Observe mouth for any adverse conditions such as bleeding, swelling, unusual mouth odor or any complaint of pain or discomfort. -Note any such condition in the resident's chart and report the problem to the charge nurse. -Refer and or assist residents to obtain dental services as indicated for routine and emergency dental care including making appointment for the resident, if needed or requested and arranging transportation to and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP-an infection control intervention designed to reduce the transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) by expanding the use of gowns and gloves during high-contact resident care activities) were implemented for one sampled resident (Resident #82) with a foot wound and receiving intravenous (IV-a way of giving a drug or other substance through a needle or tube inserted into a vein) antibiotic therapy; and out of 29 sampled residents. The facility census was 140 residents. Review of the facility's Standard and Enhanced Precautions policy and procedure dated 4/1/24, showed the purpose was to ensure the use of appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE-protective clothing, helmets, goggles, or other garments or equipment designed to protect the wearer's body from injury or infection) to improve infection control as required in the care of residents. The policy showed: -Enhanced barrier…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain a physician order for self-administration of medication at bedside and failed to evaluate and document the ability to self-administer medication for one sample resident (Resident #3) out of 12 sampled residents. The facility census was 137 residents. Review of the facility's policy titled Resident Self-Admin Meds Clinically Appropriate dated August 2020 showed: -If a resident desired to self-administer medications, an assessment was conducted by the interdisciplinary team of the resident's cognitive, physical, and visual ability to carry out the responsibility during the care planning process. -For residents who self-administer, the interdisciplinary team verified the resident's ability to self-administer medications by means of skill assessment conducted on a monthly basis or when there was a significant change in condition. -The results of the interdisciplinary team assessment of resident skills and of the determination regarding…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Transportation Driver (TD) A followed protocol related to safely securing a resident's wheelchair according to facility policy and training, affecting one sampled resident (Resident #3), who fell backwards in his/her wheelchair during transport, out of seven sampled residents. The facility census was 134 residents. On 11/8/24, the Administrator was notified of the past noncompliance which took place on 10/18/24. TD A reported the accident to his/her supervisor who provided immediate training. Drivers received documented education on 10/21/24 related to wheelchair safety during transport. The facility did an investigation and found TD A did not follow facility policy, protocols, and training related to securing the resident's wheelchair and the employee was disciplined. The deficiency was corrected on 10/21/24. Review of the facility's Vehicle Safety Program, undated showed the Administrator was responsible for ensuring the training of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure controlled substances (is generally a drug or chemical whose manufacture, possession and use is regulated by a government, such as illicitly used drugs or prescription medications that are designated by law) were counted during change of shift or when keys were transferred to another responsible party resulting in a total of 60 tablets Oxycodone Immediate Release (a narcotic pain medication) 30 milligram (mg) that were not accounted for for one sampled resident (Resident #3) out of the three sampled residents. The facility census was 126 residents. On 9/20/23, the Administrator was notified of the past noncompliance which took place on 9/1/23. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) reported unaccounted for controlled substances to Human Resources (HR) on 9/1/23. HR then informed the Director of Nursing (DON). DON and the Administrator completed a full in house audit of controlled substances on 9/1/23. Education related to controlled substances count was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · F2023-07-21 · tag F0800 — widespread
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility's dietary staff failed to sanitize their work areas before, during and after preparing food; to take food temperatures at the foods' heat source; to sanitize the juice and beverage apparatuses nozzle; and to wear the appropriate hair restraints while in the kitchen. The facility census was 125 residents. 1. Observations on 7/17/23 between 5:03 A.M. and 7:55 A.M. in the kitchen showed: -At 5:05 A.M. the beverage/juice gun was not disassembled, soaking in a sanitizing solution mixture. -The beverage/juice gun's nozzle appeared to have various beverage and juice sediment stuck to the inside and out and, was actually sticky to the touch. -The Dietary [NAME] (DC) had a full beard with sideburns and a mustache, and did not have his/her entire facial hair covered. -At 5:10 A.M. the DC prepared sausage patties on the food prep table without sanitizing it first. -After the DC prepared and placed the trays of sausage patties in the oven, he/she proceeded prepare the hot cereal on the same food preparation table in the same area.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-07-21 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the lids of the dumpster's were closed for two days during the survey. The facility census was 125 residents. 1. Observations on 7/17/23 at 8:33 A.M., 9:30 A.M. and on 7/19/23 at 9:37 A.M., and 1:06 P.M., showed: -The facility had two dumpster's for trash, each with two lids attached to them. -One lid on each dumpster was open. -On 7/19/23 at 1:06 P.M. two employees placed trash bags into the dumpster and did not close the lid. During an interview on 7/21/23 at 10:33 A.M., the Assistant Dietary Manager said : -Each and every individual person that uses the dumpster is responsible for closing the lids after they use the dumpster to discard trash. -There are several people and facility departments that use the dumpster's for trash. -Will speak with the Administrator about in-servicing all of the departments regarding the use of the dumpster and their lids. During an interview on 7/21/23 at 11:33 A.M., the Administrator said that all of the departments use the dumpster's for trash and would in-service all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-07-21 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a Facility Assessment to determine resources necessary to meet the needs of the residents, such as assessment of the resident population, staff competencies needed to provide resident care, physical plant requirements, services needed, technology resources and facility and community based risk assessment. A total of 27 residents were sampled. The facility census was 125 residents. Facility Assessment policy was requested and not received by day of exit 7/21/23. Review of the facility's Resident Census and Condition dated 7/17/23 showed the following resident demographics in the building: -Six residents with indwelling catheters (a tube with retaining balloon passed through the urethra into the bladder to drain urine). -85 residents were frequently incontinent. -Six residents had an intellectual disability (when a person has certain limitations in cognitive functioning and skills, including conceptual, social and practical skills, such as language, social and self-care skills) and/or developmental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the staff treated one sampled resident (Resident #102) with dignity when two staff members used disrespectful profanity towards the resident and around other residents out of 27 sampled residents. The facility census was 125 residents. Review of facility policy Resident Rights revised 8/2020 showed: -All residents have the right to a dignified existence. 1. Review of Resident #102's Face Sheet showed an admission to the facility on 3/19/22 with diagnoses of: -Dementia (a progressive or persistent loss of intellectual functioning, especially with impairment of memory and abstract thinking, and often with personality change). -Cognitive communication deficit. -Schizoaffective Disorder (a combination of symptoms often followed by periods of improvement, symptoms may include delusions, hallucinations depressed episodes and manic periods of high energy). -Anxiety Disorder. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by the facility staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-21 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure six sampled residents (Resident #52, #119, #50, #41, #15, #47) were offered the right to formulate and/or obtain existing advanced directives (legal documents that provide instructions for medical care and only go into effect if you cannot communicate your own wishes) out of 27 sampled residents. The facility census was 125 residents. Review of the facility's policy Advanced Directives revised 8/2020, showed: -At the time of admission, admission Staff or designee would inquire about the existence of an Advanced Directive. -If no Advanced Directive exists, the Facility provided the resident with the opportunity to complete the Advance Directive upon resident request. -Assistance was provided as necessary to execute an Advance Directive. -A copy of the Advance Directive was maintained as part of the resident's medical record. -If the resident had an Advance Directive, admission staff or designee would place a copy of the Advance Directive in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-07-21 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Employee Disqualification List (EDL - a listing of individuals who have been determined to have abused or neglected a resident), Criminal Background Checks (CBC) and Nurse Aide (NA) Registry checks were completed to ensure potential employees did not have a Federal Indicator (FI - a marker given to a potential employee who has committed abuse, neglect, or misappropriation of property against residents) in accordance with the state and federal regulation prior to hire on ten out of ten employees sampled. The facility census was 125 residents. Review of the Missouri Revised Statute Chapter 660, Section 660.317 showed, prior to allowing any person who has been hired as a full time part time or temporary position to have contact with any patient or resident, the provider shall, or in the case of temporary employees hired through or contracted for an employment agency, the employment agency shall prior to sending a temporary employee to a provider: -Request a criminal background check as provided in section 43.540,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-21 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure four sampled residents (Residents #6, #12, #104, and #120), who were dependent upon staff for activity participation, had opportunities for activities of personal interest on a daily basis out of 27 sampled residents. The facility census was 125 residents. Review of the facility's Activities Program policy and procedure, dated 6/2020 showed: -Residents will be encouraged to participate in activities to make life more meaningful, to stimulate and support physical and mental capabilities to the fullest extent, and to enable the resident to maintain the highest attainable social, physical and emotional functioning. -A variety of activities should be offered on a daily basis, including weekends and evenings. -Activities are developed for individual, small group and large group participation. -The activity schedule is posted in large print in a location accessible to residents, their families and staff. -The Director of Activities or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-07-21 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of Resident #5's admission Record showed: -He/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. -He/she had diagnoses of hallucinations (hearing, seeing, feeling, smelling, or tasting things that are not real), psychosis (a severe mental condition in which thought and emotions are so affected that contact is lost with external reality), and paranoid schizophrenia (a serious mental illness that interferes with a person's ability to think clearly, manage emotions, make decisions and relate to others and in which a person has an extreme fear and distrust of others). Review of the resident's Pharmacy Note dated 5/20/22 showed please ensure target behavior and side effect monitoring are in place in order to evaluate the continued appropriateness of the resident's antipsychotic medication - Clozapine (antipsychotic medication) . Review of the resident's Pharmacy Note dated 7/19/22 showed please ensure target behavior and side effect monitoring are in place in order to evaluate the continued appropriateness of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-07-21 · tag F0847 — pattern
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three sampled residents (Resident #10, #119, and #120) signed arbitration agreements (a private process where disputing parties agree that one or several individuals can make decisions about the dispute after receiving evidence and hearing arguments) after this was explained in a manner they understood and the resident had the right to communicate with state officials out of three sampled residents out of three sampled residents for arbitration. The census was 125 residents. Record review of the facility Arbitration Agreement policy revised 10/24/22 showed: -To provide a lawful opportunity for a provider of health services and residents/responsible parties to enter into an enforceable written contract to settle a dispute outside the court through and arbitration process. -The healthcare arbitration agreement should comply with federal and state laws. -The person tasked with obtaining signatures for arbitration agreements need to clearly explain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-07-21 · tag F0848 — pattern
    Provide a neutral and fair arbitration process and agree to arbitrator and venue.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three sampled residents (Resident #10, #119, and #120) signed arbitration agreements (a private process where disputing parties agree that one or several individuals can make decisions about the dispute after receiving evidence and hearing arguments) that contained the selection of a neutral arbitrator would be agreed upon by both parties (resident and facility) out of three sampled residents for arbitration. The census was 125 residents. Record review of the facility Arbitration Agreement policy revised 10/24/22 showed: -To provide a lawful opportunity for a provider of health services and residents/responsible parties to enter into an enforceable written contract to settle a dispute outside the court through and arbitration process. -The healthcare arbitration agreement should comply with federal and state laws. 1. Review of Resident #10's admission Minimum Data Set (a federally mandated assessment tool required to be completed by facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-07-21 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement an effective quality assurance (QA)/quality assurance performance improvement (QAPI) program when they failed to ensure they implemented appropriate interventions to correct on-going, systemic issues regarding weights not being completed or correctly completed and fall interventions not being implemented; and to complete effective audits for weights and falls after issues were determined in QA. The facility census was 125 residents. Review of the facility's policy QAPI Program, revised 10/24/2022, showed: -The facility implemented and maintained an ongoing, facility-wide QAPI program designed to monitor and evaluate the quality of resident care, pursue methods to improve care quality, and resolved identified problems. -Provided a means to identify and resolve present and potential negative outcomes related to resident care and safety. -Established and implemented plan to correct deficiencies and monitored the effects of action plans on resident outcomes. -The Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) committee…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program that included tracking and trending of facility resident infections. The facility census was 125 residents. Review of the facility Infection Prevention and Control Program, revised October 24, 2022 showed: -The facility must establish an Infection Prevention and Control Program under which it identifies, investigates, controls, and prevents infections in the facility and maintains a record of incidents and corrective actions related to infections. -The Infection Preventionist (IP) collects, analyzes, and provides infection data and trends to nursing staff, physicians. -The IP will determine specific sites and pathogen trends. -The IP will at least on a monthly basis conduct an infection control audit to identify trends. -Infection data is analyze to identify trends. -Infection rates are compared to previous months in the current year and to the same month in previous years to identify trends, patterns, or problems that reflect the development of healthcare-associated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-07-21 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure they completed an antibiotic stewardship program over the past 12 months. The facility census was 125 residents. Review of the facility Antibiotic Stewardship Program revised June 2020 showed: -The Antibiotic Stewardship Program (ASP) was designed to promote appropriate use of antibiotics while optimizing the treatment of infections, and reduce the possible adverse events associated with antibiotic use. -The infection control committee (ICC) would review and monitor antibiotic usage patterns on a regular basis and would obtain and review results from microbial cultures, resistant organisms, alerts and antibiograms (reports that show how susceptible subtypes of disease causing organisms are to a variety of antibiotics) tables showing how susceptible a series of organisms are to different antimicrobials) from the lab for trends of antibiotic resistance. -The IP would report on the number of antibiotics prescribed (days of therapy) and the number of residents treated each month and would collect and analyze the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-07-21 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two sampled residents (Resident #47 and #104) received teaching regarding the benefits and risks of influenza and pneumococcal vaccination, and that the resident's consent/declination was retained in the resident's medical record for two of five residents selected for review for vaccination. The facility census was 125 residents. Policies were requested for resident influenza and pneumococcal vaccination were requested and not received. 1. Review of Resident #47's electronic medical record (EMR) dated 8/23/22 through 7/21/23 showed: -His/her Immunization Report showed that he/she had refused the pneumococcal and influenza vaccines with no documented dates of his/her refusal refusals. -No documentation regarding teaching regarding the benefits and risks of influenza and pneumococcal vaccination. -No documentation that the resident had refused/consented the influenza and pneumococcal vaccines. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-21 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify residents and/or family/representative of care plan (written out plan for the care of the resident) meetings or have care plan meetings for one sampled resident (Resident #52) out of 26 sampled residents. The facility census was 125 residents. Review of the facility's policy titled Care Planning Nursing Manual-Nursing Administration dated 6/2020 showed: -The facility would invite the resident, if capable, and the resident's family to care plan meetings and used its best efforts to have scheduled care planning meetings at times that are were convenient for the resident and family. -When a resident did not have family, or if the resident/family requested it, the Interdisciplinary team (IDT) would invite the Ombudsman to attend the care planning meeting. 1. Review of Resident #52's admission Record showed he/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: -Diabetes Mellitus (a chronic condition that affects the way the body…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-21 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed notify the physician when behaviors became excessive for one sampled resident (Resident #15) out of 27 sampled residents. The facility census was 125 residents. Review of the facility Change of Condition policy updated 6/2020 showed: -The nurses were responsible for notifying the residents' physician of a significant change including a deterioration in mental health. -The physician should be notified timely with a change of condition. 1. Review of Resident #15's admission Record showed he/she had the following diagnoses: -Anxiety (anticipation of impending danger and dread accompanied by restlessness, tension, fast heart rate, and breathing difficulty not associated with an apparent stimulus). -Depression (a state of intense sadness or despair that has advanced to the point of being disruptive to an individual's social functioning and/or activities of daily living). -Dementia (a progressive organic mental disorder characterized by chronic personality disintegration, confusion, disorientation, stupor,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-21 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the ombudsman (a resident advocate who provides support and assistance with problems and/or complaints regarding the facility) of a resident discharge from the facility for one sampled resident (Resident #41) and two closed sampled residents (Resident's #126 and #129) and to ensure that written notice of transfer or discharge was provided to the resident and/or family for one sampled resident (Resident#41) and for one closed sampled resident (Resident #126) out of three closed record sampled residents. The facility census was 125 residents. Review of the facility policy and procedure Transfer and Discharge, revised 8/2020 showed: -To ensure that residents are transferred and discharged from the facility in compliance with state and federal laws and to provide a complete, safe, and appropriate discharge planning and necessary information to the continuing care provider. -Documentation relating to resident's transfer/discharge will be maintained…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-21 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident and/or the resident's representative(s) of the facility's bed-hold policy before transferring or discharging the resident to the hospital for one sampled resident (Resident #41) out of 33 sampled residents. The facility census was 125 residents. Record review of the facility's Bed Hold policy revised 6/2020 showed the facility would notify the resident or his/her representative in writing of the bed hold policy any time a resident was transferred to an acute care hospital. 1. Review of Resident #41's discharge MDS dated [DATE] showed the resident was sent to the hospital return anticipated. Review of the resident's Nurses Notes dated 5/1/23 showed: -The resident was found unresponsive. -The resident's physician was notified. -The resident was sent to the hospital. -There was not documentation showing a bed hold policy was provided. Review of the resident's electronic medical record on 7/20/23 showed no documentation of the bed hold…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to include one sampled resident's (Resident #5) diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD - a mental health condition triggered by a terrifying event - either experiencing it or witnessing it; symptoms may include flashbacks, nightmares and severe anxiety, as well as uncontrollable thoughts about the event) in his/her comprehensive care plan out of 27 sampled residents. The facility census was 125 residents. Review of the facility's Care Planning policy revised June 2020 showed: -The facility would develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident. -The care plan would include measurable objectives and timetables to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs. -Each resident's comprehensive care plan would describe the services that would be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being, and specialized services including rehabilitative…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-21 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to perform restorative nursing services, and to apply a therapeutic splint for one sampled resident (Resident #52) out of 27 sampled residents. The facility census was 125 residents. Review of the facility's policy titled Restorative Nursing Program Guidelines dated 6/2020 showed: -A resident would be started on a Restorative Nursing program when a resident was discharged from formulized physical, occupational, or speech rehabilitation therapy. -General restorative nursing care was that which did not require the use of a qualified professional therapist to render such care. -Basic restorative nursing categories include: --Active range of motion. --Passive range of motion. --Splinting or bracing. --Dressing or grooming. 1. Review of Resident #52's admission Record showed he/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: -Diabetes Mellitus (a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-21 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure coordination of care between the facility and the dialysis (a process for removing waste and excess water from the blood, and is primarily used to provide an artificial replacement for lost kidney function in people with renal failure) center was maintained to ensure the continuum of care for one sampled resident (Resident #47) out of 27 sampled residents. The facility census was 125 residents. Review of the facility's Dialysis Care undated policy showed: -The facility would communicate and collaborate in writing with the dialysis clinic. -This should include any medication changes, changes of condition and tolerance of the resident's procedure. 1. Review of Resident #47's admission Record showed the resident had the following diagnoses: -End stage renal disease (the gradual loss of kidney function). -Dependent on dialysis. Review of the resident's Care Plan revised 1/12/23 showed: -The resident received dialysis services on Monday, Wednesday and Friday. -There was no documentation in the care plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-21 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary behavioral health care services for a resident's psychosocial well-being when staff did not address the resident's behaviors, monitor behaviors, and intervene when behaviors became excessive for one sampled resident (Resident #15) out of 27 sampled residents. The facility census was 125 residents. Review of the facility Behavior Management policy revised 6/2020 showed: -The purpose of the policy was to implement the most desirable and effective interventions to change, modify decrease, or eliminate behaviors that were distressing to the resident. -The staff were to identify residents with behaviors that may pose a risk to self or others. -Develop individual and practical care strategies based on assessed needs. -Implement a behavior management program. -Complete on-going assessments, monitoring, and evaluation of the effectiveness of medications. -The goal was to improve the residents' quality of life. -As part of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-21 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff consistently and accurately documented resident behaviors and/or monitored the effectiveness of interventions for two sampled residents (Residents #120 and #6) out of 27 sampled residents. The facility census was 125 residents. Review of the facility Behavior Management policy revised 6/2020 showed: -The purpose of the policy was to implement the most desirable and effective interventions to change, modify decrease, or eliminate behaviors that were distressing to the resident. -The staff were to identify residents with behaviors that may pose a risk to self or others. -Develop individual and practical care strategies based on assessed needs. -Implement a behavior management program. -Complete on-going assessments, monitoring, and evaluation of the effectiveness of medications. -The goal was to improve the residents' quality of life. -As part of the behavior management process staff would provide ongoing assessment, monitoring…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-21 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide medically related social services to attain the highest practical physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of one resident by not providing supportive services for one sampled resident (Resident #15) who exhibited changes in behaviors, such as excessively stacking belongings all over his/her room and bed, using Rubber Maid totes and a plunger to wash clothing, believing he/she had gone blind for a few days, and sweeping up mice droppings daily which were not present in the room. In addition, the facility failed to monitor and provide practical care strategies based on assessment needs out of 27 sampled residents. The facility census was 125 residents. Review of the facility Social Services policy revised 08/2020 showed: -Medically related social services were provided to residents in order to maintain and improve the residents' well-being. -The resident was assessed for factors that may have a negative impact on his/her life.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-21 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review,the facility failed to ensure one sampled resident's (Resident #5) drug regimen was free from antipsychotic (a type of medication used treat a severe mental condition in which thought and emotions are so affected that contact is lost with external reality) medication without adequate indications for use as demonstrated by identification of and monitoring of target behaviors, and by monitoring for adverse reactions for use and without monitoring for adverse effects, out of 27 sampled residents. The facility census was 125 residents. A policy for antipsychotic medications was requested and not received. 1. Review of Resident #5's admission Record showed: -He/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. -He/she had diagnoses of hallucinations (hearing, seeing, feeling, smelling, or tasting things that are not real), psychosis (a severe mental condition in which thought and emotions are so affected that contact is lost with external reality), and paranoid schizophrenia (a serious…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-21 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5 percent (%). Out of 34 observed medication opportunities, two errors occurred resulting in an error rate of 5.88%. One error involved an eye drop medication (Resident #16), one error involved an inhaler medication (Resident #33). The facility census was 125 residents. Review of facility policy and procedure for Eye Drop Administration, revised 8/2020 showed: -Put on examination gloves. -Remove the cap, taking care to avoid touching the dropper tip. Place the cap on the barrier or a clean, dry surface. -Tilt the resident's head back slightly. -With a gloved finger, gently pull down the lower eyelid to form a pouch while instructing the resident to look up. Place your other hand against the resident's forehead to steady. Hold the inverted medication bottle between the thumb and index finger and press gently to instill the prescribed number of drops into the pouch near the outer corner of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-03-16 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide residents with activities to meet the interests and abilities of four sampled residents (Residents #4, #18, #62, and #153) out of four residents sampled for activities. There were 21 residents sampled overall. The facility census was 105 residents. Record review of the facility's Activities Program policy dated June 2020 showed: -Instructions to encourage residents to participate in activities to make life more meaningful, to stimulate and support physical and mental capabilities to the fullest extent and to enable the resident to maintain the highest attainable social, physical and emotional functioning. -Provide an activity program to meet the needs, interests and preferences of the residents. -Complete an initial activity assessment within seven days of admission. -Complete the activity preference section of the Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff and used for care planning)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-03-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to label medications with dates when they were first opened; failed to maintain cleanliness of medication bottles; failed to remove a medication that was discontinued from the medication cart, and dispose of it appropriately; and failed to ensure the medication refrigerator was maintained and clean. The facility census was 105 residents. Record review of facilities undated Medication Storage policy showed: -Medication storage areas are kept clean, well-lit, and free of clutter and extreme temperature and humidity. -Certain medications or package types, such as intravenous (IV) solutions, multiple dose injectable vials, ophthalmics (relating to the eye and its diseases), nitroglycerin tablets (medication used to prevent chest pain (angina) in people with a certain heart condition (coronary artery disease)), once opened, require an expiration date shorter than the manufacture's expiration date to insure medication purity and potency. Once any medication or biological package is opened, the facility should follow…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-03-16 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain consent prior to the administration of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19-a respiratory disease caused by a new coronavirus, named SARS-CoV-2 and the disease it causes has been named coronavirus disease 2019) vaccine from the resident's Durable Power of Attorney (DPOA- a person previously identified to make decisions for an individual in the event of inability to make wishes known) for one supplemental resident (Resident #11) out of seven residents sampled for vaccinations. The overall sample was 21 residents. The facility census was 105 residents. The facility did not have a policy regarding obtaining consent. 1. Record review of Resident #11's care plan initiated 2/5/20 showed the resident was cognitively impaired. Record review of the resident's DPOA activation letter dated 2/18/20 showed the resident was deemed incapable of making appropriate healthcare decisions by two physicians and the resident's DPOA was activated. Record review of the resident's notes in the electronic health record dated December 2020…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to OPCO SKILLED MANAGEMENT — 66 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.2-0.2 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.7-0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.3+0.7 vs chain
The other 65 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
1 of 5Bluebird Wellness And RehabilitationSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Brentwood Place ThreeDallas, TX 1 of 5Broadway Nursing & RehabilitationSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5Cameron Nursing CenterCameron, MO 1 of 5Carmel Hills Wellness & RehabilitationIndependence, MO 1 of 5Casa Arena Healthcare LLCAlamogordo, NM 1 of 5Casa Maria HealthcareRoswell, NM 1 of 5Forest Park Nursing & RehabilitationDallas, TX 1 of 5Fort Worth Wellness & RehabilitationFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Glenview Wellness & RehabilitationNorth Richland Hills, TX 1 of 5Highland Pines Nursing HomeLongview, TX 1 of 5Ivy Creek Wellness & RehabilitationWaco, TX 1 of 5Las Cruces Village Nursing & Rehabilitation LLCLas Cruces, NM 1 of 5Magnolia Wellness CenterSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Maple Grove Wellness & RehabilitationFenton, MO 1 of 5Mineola Gardens Wellness & RehabilitationMineola, TX 1 of 5Pine Grove ManorSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Rehab Of Kansas City SouthKansas City, MO 1 of 5The Hillcrest Of North DallasDallas, TX 1 of 5West Side Campus Of CareWhite Settlement, TX 1 of 5Willow Ridge Wellness & RehabilitationFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Willowcreek Wellness & RehabilitationFlorissant, MO 2 of 5Arbor Lake Nursing & Rehabilitation, LLCFort Worth, TX 2 of 5Aztec HealthcareAztec, NM 2 of 5Betty Dare Wellness & Rehabilitation LLCAlamogordo, NM 2 of 5Blue Springs Wellness & RehabilitationBlue Springs, MO 2 of 5Cypress Springs Wellness & RehabilitationMount Vernon, TX 2 of 5Fiesta Park Wellness & RehabilitationAlbuquerque, NM 2 of 5La Vida Buena HealthcareLas Vegas, NM 2 of 5Los Alamos Wellness & RehabilitationLos Alamos, NM 2 of 5McGregor Wellness & RehabilitationMc Gregor, TX 2 of 5Monarch Springs Wellness & RehabilitationUniversity City, MO 2 of 5Northrise Wellness & RehabilitationLas Cruces, NM 2 of 5Prescott Valley Nursing & RehabilitationPrescott Valley, AZ 2 of 5Prescott Village Nursing & RehabilitationPrescott, AZ 2 of 5Rehabilitation Center Of Independence, TheIndependence, MO 2 of 5San Antonio Wellness & RehabilitationSan Antonio, TX 2 of 5Skyline Nursing CenterDallas, TX 2 of 5Sunny Springs Nursing & RehabSulphur Springs, TX 2 of 5White Acres Wellness & RehabilitationEl Paso, TX

Showing 40 of 65; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
EL DORADO NURSING AND REHABILITATION LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/12/2022
CALIBER ADVISORS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/22/2022
CRESTVIEW TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/12/2022
FIRST SWEETZER HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/12/2022
HATTERAS INVESTMENTS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/12/2022
RIMPAU HOLDINGS TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/12/2022
SASEM INVESTMENTS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/12/2022
10425 CHESTNUT DRIVE MO, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/12/2022
EMERALD PROPERTY PARTNERS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/12/2022
GIBRALTAR TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/12/2022
MONTGOMERY SKY TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/12/2022
OZARK HEALTHCARE REALTY LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/12/2022
GARETZ, DAVIDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/12/2022
SANDERS, KAYATANAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
TADAKAMALLA, SRINATHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/12/2023
HAGINS, ELIZABETHIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/16/2025
KAPLAN, ESTHERIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/14/2025
KAPLAN, MORDECHAIIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/16/2025
KAPLAN, MOSHAIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/14/2025
STERNSHEIN, JENNIFERIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/16/2025
UNGER, JEFFREYIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/14/2025
ZIMMERMAN, CAROLINEIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/16/2025
ESDOV INVESTMENTS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/12/2022
JUBILEE MASTER HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/12/2022

CMS files one row per role, so the 33 rows in the source record cover these 24 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

14 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$14.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+12.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.9M
Related-party expense23% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 90%Medicare 4%Other / private 6%

About 90% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 23% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$261per resident / day
operating cost
$7,942per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$299per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Missouri
$6,741/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,400/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265597. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-03-14, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next