No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Casa Arena Healthcare LLC

205 Moonglow Avenue, Alamogordo, NM 88310 · For profit - Corporation · 117 certified beds · (575) 434-4510 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Apr 2023Resident-funds citation (F0568)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0740, F0744, F0758)2 immediate-jeopardy citations$124,375 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2023
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0568)
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (92) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $124,375 in federal fines (most recent 2024-04-24)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (61%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • about 27% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1401 10th St Ste 1 · (575) 434-5195 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1003 10th St · (575) 223-0795 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1300 10th St · (575) 488-1200 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1100 Oregon Ave · (575) 439-4142 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
101 Dale Scott Ave · (916) 821-6436

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased4.9%11.3%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.7%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%0.9%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.9%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.2%2.0%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.6%3.5%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened5.8%11.7%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication19.4%14.7%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.7%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.5%5.2%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control22.1%20.0%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table26.8%14.5%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.1%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine71.9%86.4%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission31.4%22.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit22.7%15.7%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.151.651.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.312.811.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 111 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

46.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
72.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.23U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 72.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 59 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 29% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF46.6%CMS range 38.5–56.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.8%CMS range 8.6–15.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge72.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge76.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge62.7%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified84.8%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting93.1%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge95.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.3%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.6%CMS range 4.6–12.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.901.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.29
RN hours/ resident / day
0.88
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.76
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.92
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.18
RN hoursweekends
60.8%
Total nursing turnover
70.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 117 beds and averages 96.0 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 21 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.92 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.29 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.76 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.68 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.02 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.33 to 0.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 61% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

19
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-06-05)
26
at the previous standard inspection (2024-04-24)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

92 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 79 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-04-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 (R #108) of 2 (R #78 and R #108) residents when they failed to: 1. Notify the provider about R #108's abnormal lab values (high potassium). 2. Notify the provider about potential drug-to-drug interactions for R #108. 3. Monitor potassium levels for R #108 who had elevated potassium blood levels, chronic kidney disease (a condition in which the kidneys are damaged and cannot filter blood as well as they should), and an order for medications that can cause hyperkalemia (elevated potassium blood levels). 4. Notify the provider about R #108 experiencing nausea and vomiting. These deficient practices likely lead to R #108's death. The findings are: R #108 A. Record review of R #108's face sheet, revealed R #108 was admitted on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #108's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed R #108 had a diagnosis of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · L2023-10-24 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — widespread
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that nursing staff demonstrated competency in skills and techniques necessary to safely administer medications to residents for 4 (RN #1, RN #33, LPN #31, and LPN #32) of 6 (RN #1, RN #31, RN #33, LPN #31, LPN #32, and CMA #31) employees sampled for training. This deficient practice likely resulted in R #1 receiving another residents medication, resulting in R #1 being admitted to the hospital on [DATE] for accidental overdose and hypotension (low blood pressure). The findings are: A. Record review of the facility Medication Administration Nursing Manual Policy and Procedure undated revealed IV. Nursing Staff will keep in mind the seven 'rights' of medication when administering medication: A. The right medication, B. The right amount, C. The right resident, D. The right time, E. The right route, F. Right indication, G. Right outcome. B. Record review of the facility's Complaint Narrative Investigation Follow-up Report (5 day), no date, revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2023-10-24 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents are free of any significant medication errors for 1 (R #1) of 6 (R #1, R #2, R #3, R #4, R #5, and R #6) residents reviewed for neglect, when they failed to administer medication to the correct resident. This deficient practice likely resulted in R #1 experiencing adverse (unwanted, harmful, or abnormal result) side effects and admission to the hospital. The findings are: A. On 10/16/23 at 2:15 PM, during a phone interview, R #1's daughter stated the following: 1. She received a phone call from the nurse at the facility on 06/02/23 at 10:00 PM stating R #1 received another resident's medications along with her own and was being sent to the hospital. 2. R #1 was hospitalized for six to seven days. Three of those days were in the ICU (Intensive Care Unit). B. Record review of R #1's Progress Notes, written by RN #31, revealed: 1. On 06/02/23 at 8:30 PM, R #1 received another resident's medications, which were sucralfate (medication used…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to secure medications in a medication cart for 58 residents on the 600 Unit (residents were identified by the census list provided by the Director of Nursing (DON) on 05/07/26). This deficient practice could likely result in residents obtaining medication not prescribed to them resulting in adverse side effects. The findings are:A. On 05/08/26 at 12:46 PM, during an observation of the 600 unit, revealed an unlocked medication cart. Staff were not present. B. On 05/08/26 at 12:47 PM, during an interview, CNA #8 stated the medication cart was unlocked on the 600 unit. C. On 05/08/26 at 1:04 PM, during an interview, the DON stated the medication carts should be locked when not in direct care of staff.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medical records were complete and accurate for 1 (R #18) of 3 (R #17, R #18, and R #27) residents reviewed accuracy of documentation when staff failed to: 1. Document R #18's enteral feedings (tube feeding, delivers liquid nutrition directly into the stomach or small intestine via a tube for individuals unable to meet nutritional needs orally, despite having a functional gastrointestinal tract.) 2. Document R #18's residual volume (the amount of formula and gastric juice remaining in the stomach, often checked to assess tube feeding tolerance).3. Document R #18's enteral flushes (water administered through enteral tube). These deficient practices have the potential to negatively impact the care staff provide to meet residents' needs due to inaccurate records. The findings are:A. Record review of R #18's admission Record, no date, revealed the following:1. R #18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].2. R #18 had the following diagnoses: a.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited beforedisputed · IDR2026-03-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to report allegations of misappropriation of resident property (the deliberate misplacement, exploitation, or wrongful, temporary, or permanent use of a resident's belongings or money without the resident's consent) to the State Agency within 24 hours of an allegation for 1 (R #17) of 4 (R #16, R #17, R #27, and R #29) residents reviewed for misappropriation of property, when staff failed to report allegations of missing money for R #17. If the facility fails to report allegations of misappropriation of resident property to the state agency within 24 hours of the allegation, then corrective action may not be taken, and residents may suffer increased anxiety and fear that their belongings are not being protected. The findings are:A. Record review of R #17's admission Record, no date, revealed the following: 1. R #17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. 2. R #17 had a diagnosis of cognitive communication deficit (difficulty with verbal or non-verbal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ddisputed · IDR2026-03-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of misappropriation of property (the deliberate misplacement, exploitation, or wrongful, temporary, or permanent use of a resident's belongings or money without the resident's consent) for 1 (R #17) of 4 (R #16, R #17, R #27, and R #29) residents reviewed for misappropriation of property. If the facility does not adequately investigate allegations of misappropriation of resident property, then corrective action may not be implemented to protect other residents which could cause residents to suffer increased anxiety and fear that their belongings are not being protected. The findings are:A. Record review of R #17's admission Record, no date, revealed the following: 1. R #17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. 2. R #17 had a diagnosis of cognitive communication deficit (difficulty with verbal or non-verbal communication caused by underlying cognitive deficits, rather than primary speech or language impairments).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure care plans were revised for 1 (R #24) of 5 (R #24, R #25, R #26, R #27 and R #28) residents when staff failed to revise R #24's care plan with the most current resident information regarding care preferences. This deficient practice could likely result in the care plan not being updated with the most current resident conditions and appropriate interventions, staff being unaware of changes in care provided, and residents not receiving the care related to changes in their health status or healthcare decisions. The findings are: A. Record review of R #24's admission Record, no date revealed the following: 1. An admission date of 12/24/19. 2. R #24 diagnoses of unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, with other behavioral disturbances (a type or severity of dementia that is not clearly determined, and the patient exhibits behavioral disturbances such as agitation, aggression, psychosis, mood changes, and sleep disturbances). B. Record review of R #24's 5-day complaint narrative note (the facility's incident follow…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-23 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medical records were complete and accurate for 1 (R #9) of 4 (R #8, R #9, R #10, and R #11) residents reviewed for documentation accuracy when staff failed to document R #9's skin impairment (the skin's normal structure and function are compromised). This deficient practice has the potential to negatively impact the care staff provide to meet residents' needs due to missing or inaccurate records and resident information. The findings are: A. Record review of R #9's skin assessment dated [DATE], revealed R #9 had an open area on her coccyx (tailbone). B. Record review of R #9's nursing progress note, dated 12/18/25, revealed the medical provider was notified of the open area. The facility would follow up with the wound care nurse (WCN) for treatment of R #9's open area on the coccyx. C. Record review of R #9's medical record no date, revealed the WCN did not document her assessments of R #9. D. On 12/23/25 at 9:48 AM, during an interview, LPN #8…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a comfortable and homelike environment for 1(R #8) of 1 (R #8) resident when staff failed to keep R #8's bathroom clean of urine around the toilet. This deficient practice could likely cause the residents to feel like they are not living in a comfortable home-like environment and like they are not valued. The findings are:A. On 07/14/25 at 11:06 AM, during an observation of R #8's bathroom, a strong smell of urine. The floor around the toilet had a wet spot and the floor appeared to be stained with a darker color than the rest of the floor. There was dark build up around the toilet seal on the floor. B. On 07/14/25 at 11:08 AM, during an interview, LPN #8 confirmed the urine on the floor of R #8's bathroom floor and the odor. LPN #8 stated R #8 does go to the bathroom on his own. LPN #8 stated she did not think the toilet was leaking. C. On 07/17/25 at 11:06 AM, during an interview, the Administrator said her expectation is the bathroom be cleaned and staff be made aware of the urine on the floor.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-14 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive MDS assessment was completed within 14 calendar days after admission for 1 (R #1) of 9 (R #1, R #3, R #4, R #5, R #8, R #9, R #10, R #25, and R #26) residents reviewed for MDS assessment timing. This deficient practice could likely result in residents' care not being met. The findings are: A. Record review of R #1's admission Record (no date) revealed an admission date of 04/09/25. B. Record review of R #1's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the assessment was not completed by the RN until 04/26/25. C. On 07/14/25 at 3:29 PM, during an interview with the administrator and the director of clinical services, they confirmed R #1's admission MDS assessment was not completed by facility staff within 14 days of admission.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-14 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete and transmit (electronically sending encoded information) a Significant Change in Condition (SCIC; major decline or improvement in the patient's health status) MDS assessment within 14 days after the facility determined a significant change in the resident's physical or mental condition for 1 (R #2) of 3 (R #1, R #2 and R #3) residents reviewed for SCIC MDS assessment timing. This deficient practice could likely result in the residents not receiving the appropriate care and services they need related to changes in their condition. The findings are: A. Record review of R #2's Physician's Orders dated 06/03/25 revealed: admit to hospice.B. Record review of R #2's MDS assessments revealed a SCIC MDS assessment was not completed upon R #2's admission to hospice. C. On 07/14/25 at 3:45 PM, during an interview with the administrator and the director of clinical services, they confirmed staff did not complete the required SCIC MDS within 14 days of R #2's admission to hospice.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-06-05 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain appropriate staffing levels to meet the needs of the residents. This failure has the potential to affect all 98 residents (residents were identified by the resident census list provided by the Administrator on 06/01/25). This deficient practice could likely result in residents not receiving the care and service needed while in the facility. The findings are: A. On 06/02/25 at 9:14 AM during an interview with R #31 and her daughter. R #31's daughter stated that she comes in the mornings because the facility is short staffed, and staff don't give R #31 her dentures, and get R #31 situated for breakfast. R #31's daughter stated R #31's hair hasn't been washed since she entered the facility a few weeks ago. B. On 06/01/25 at 12:05 PM, during an interview, R #44 stated the following: 1. He preferred to eat food in his room. 2. When the facility is short staffed, they deliver meal trays late. 3. That morning (06/01/25), they were short staffed, it took an hour to get his breakfast and it was cold. C. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 79 citations
  • Potential for harm · F2025-06-05 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to submit direct care staffing information to the federal agency overseeing certification for long term care facilities for July 2024 through December 2024. This has the potential to affect all 98 residents in the facility, (residents were identified by the Resident Matrix provided by the Administrator on 06/01/25). This deficient practice could likely result in inaccurate direct care staffing information for residents/facility. The findings are: A. Record review of Payroll Base Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Report (report from the data base of the federal agency overseeing certification for long term care facilities) dated Quarter #3 and #4 2024 (July 1 through December 31) revealed low weekend staffing. B. On 06/05/25 at 9:33 AM, during an interview, the Administrator revealed that contracted staff are not being captured on the PBJ report. The Administrator stated that contract staff don't clock in and out at the facility like staff do, and their agency keeps their time. The Administrator said that they are working with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Recite from [DATE] Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a comfortable and homelike environment for all 69 residents who do not reside in the secure unit (residents were identified by the census provided by the Administrator on [DATE]) when staff failed to: 1. Store a deceased resident's belongings out of common areas share by residents. 2. Repair the floor in front of R #31's restroom, and replace ceiling covers above R #31's bed. These deficient practices could likely cause residents to feel like they are not living in a comfortable home like environment and like they are not valued. The findings are: A. On [DATE] at 2:28 PM an observation of R #31's room revealed the floor in front of R #31's restroom door had a deep indention in the floor, and the ceiling above R #31's bed had 2 large brown stains. B. On [DATE] at 2:28 PM during an interview with the Maintenance director, he confirmed the floor in front of R #31's restroom door had a deep indention in the floor, and the ceiling…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-05 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — pattern
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents did not receive psychotropic medications (group of drugs that affect behavior, mood, thoughts, or perception) unless the medication was medically necessary for 4 (R #14, R #15, R #33 and R #63) of 7 (R #14, R #15, R #18, R #28, R #33, R #35 and R #63) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, when staff failed to ensure: 1. A gradual dose reduction (GDR; stepwise tapering of a dose to determine if symptoms, conditions, or risks can be managed by a lower dose or if the dose or medication can be discontinued) was carried out for R #14 and R #63. 2. Psychotropic medications ordered to be given as needed (PRN) for R #15 and R #33 were not prescribed for longer than 14 days without documentation of the rationale to extend beyond 14 days in the resident's medical record including an indication for the duration of the PRN order. These deficient practices could likely result in residents receiving medications without a medical reason and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Recite from 08/21/24 Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure care plan revisions occurred for 2 (R #68 and R #86) of 6 (R #21, R #28, R #33, R #35, R #68, and R #86) residents when the staff failed to revise the care plan with the most current resident information. This deficient practice could likely result in the care plan not being updated with the most current resident conditions and appropriate interventions, staff being unaware of changes in care provided, and residents not receiving the care related to changes in their health status or healthcare decisions. The findings are: R #68 A. Record review of R #68's admission documents, no date, revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #68's physician's orders, multiple dates, revealed the following: 1. An order dated 05/27/25, to monitor right heel daily for redness. 2. An order dated 05/20/25 and discontinued on 05/27/25 for wound care to the right heel. 3. An order dated 03/19/25 and discontinued on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-05 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — pattern
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received necessary behavioral health care to meet their needs for 1 (R #63) of 2 (R #14 and R #63) residents reviewed for behavioral health concerns when staff failed to ensure consistent psychiatric services. This deficient practice could likely result in residents not receiving the behavioral or mental health care and assistance needed to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. The findings are: A. Record review of R #63's admission record (no date) revealed the following: 1. R #63 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. 2. R #63 diagnoses as follows: a. Unspecified dementia, moderate, with psychotic disturbance (diagnosis that encompasses a range of symptoms that lead to a decline in skills your brain uses to complete daily tasks, can cause abnormal thinking and perceptions but specific details regarding the condition are not clearly defined). b. Other recurrent depressive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-05 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — pattern
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a resident diagnosed with dementia (group of symptoms related to loss of memory, judgment, language, complex motor skills, and other intellectual function, caused by the permanent damage or death of the brain's nerve cells) received appropriate treatment and services to attain his highest mental and psychosocial well-being for 1 (R #33) of 1 (R #33) resident reviewed for dementia treatment and services when the facility failed to: 1. Ensure R #33's care and services are person centered and help maximize his dignity and autonomy. 2. Utilize individualized, non-pharmalogical (treatments or interventions that do not involve the use of medications or drugs) approaches to his care. This deficient practice could likely result in a lack of meaningful relationships, engagement in day-to-day activities and diminished quality of life. A. Record review of R #33's admission record, no date, revealed the following: 1. R #33 was admitted to the facility on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-05 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the consultant pharmacist's recommendations were reviewed and implemented by the physician and/or the physician provided documentation of a rationale (set of reasons or a logical basis for a course of action) for not following the consultant pharmacist's recommendation for 3 (R #14, R #33 and R #63) of 7 (R #14, R #15, R #18, R #28, R #33, R #35, and R #63) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. This deficient practice could likely result in residents receiving medications that are no longer necessary and may cause unnecessary drug interactions (changes to medication action caused by being combined with other foods, beverages, or drugs) or adverse side effects (unwanted, undesirable effects from medication). The findings are: R #14 A. Record review of R #14's admission record (no date) revealed the following: 1. R #14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. 2. R #14 had a diagnosis of other recurrent depressive disorders (mental health…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Recite from 04/24/24 Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store food under sanitary conditions for all 94 residents who eat food from the kitchen (residents were identified by the resident matrix provided by the administrator on (06/01/25) when staff failed label and date all items in the kitchen refrigerator. Failure to store food under safe and sanitary conditions could likely lead to foodborne illnesses in residents. The findings are: A. On 06/01/25 at 9:25 AM, an observation of the kitchen revealed the following: 1. The refrigerator had two trays with 10 lid-covered beverages, the lids were not dated. 2. The walk-in refrigerator had three trays with covered desserts on them. The desserts did not have a date to indicate when they were prepared. B. On 06/01/25 at 9:32 AM, during an interview, the Dietary Manager confirmed that the drinks and desserts should all be labeled with the date they were prepared.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with respect and dignity for 2 (R #86 and R #253) of 3 (R #33, R #86 and R #253) residents when the facility failed to do the following: 1. Use a privacy bag for R #86's foley catheter bag (a urine drainage bag that collects urine from the bladder). 2. Treat R #253 with dignity when serving him lunch. The findings are: R #86 A. On 06/02/25 at 3:15 PM, during an observation of the 600 unit, R #86's catheter bag did not have a privacy bag (a discreet cover that conceals the urine drainage bag from view). B. On 06/02/25 at 3:18, during an interview, CNA #8 confirmed that there was not a privacy bag on R #86's catheter bag. C. On 06/02/25 at 3:42, during an interview, the DON said that catheters bags should have a privacy cover. R #253 D. Record review of R #253's administration record, no date revealed the following: 1. R #253 was admitted to the facility of 05/12/17. 2. R #253 diagnoses included the following: a. Muscle weakness (generalized). b. Hemiplegia, unspecified affecting the left non…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Recite from 04/24/24 Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to notify the provider of missed medication doses and treatment for 2 (R #46 and R #86) of 2 (R #46 and R #86) residents reviewed for medication administration and edema, (swelling caused by an accumulation of fluid in the body's tissues, often in the feet, ankles, and legs). when staff failed to: 1. Notify the provider that R #46 refused her lactulose (medication used to treat constipation. It can also treat liver disease) on 06/04/25. 2. Notify the provider that R #46 received a partial (incomplete) dose of Albuterol (medication that is inhaled to treat or prevent spasms of the respiratory tract) on 06/04/25. 3. Notify the provider that R #86 does not wear her compression stockings (specialized hosiery designed to help prevent the occurrence of, and guard against further progression of, venous disorders such as edema, phlebitis and thrombosis) as ordered. These deficient practices could likely result in residents not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Recite from 04/24/24 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS; federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff) were accurate for 2 (R #35 and R #66) of 9 (R #14, R #21, R #28, R #35, R #46, R #60, R #63, R #66 and R #77) residents reviewed for accurate MDS assessments. This deficient practice could likely result in the facility not having an accurate assessment of the residents' needs. The findings are: R #35 A. Record review of R #35's admission documents, no date, revealed R #35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #35's history and physical (H&P, physician obtains a thorough medical history from the patient, performs a physical examination, and then documents their findings), dated 04/25/25 revealed the following: 1. R #35 had a diagnosis of chronic systolic heart failure with an onset (start) date of 11/27/24. 2. R #35 had a diagnosis of chronic diastolic heart failure with an onset date of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Recite from 10/18/24 Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to create an accurate baseline care plan (minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for a resident immediately upon their admission to the facility) within 48 hours of admission for 1 (R #254) of 3 (R #33, R #72 and R#254) residents reviewed for baseline care plans. This deficient practice could likely result in residents not receiving the appropriate care and may place residents at risk of an adverse event (undesirable experience, preventable or non-preventable, that caused harm to a resident because of medical care or lack of medical care) or worsening of current condition after admission. The findings are: A. Record review of R #254's admission Record, no date, revealed R #254 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. B. On 06/01/25 at 12:08 PM during an interview, R #254 said he has had a catheter for a while, no date given. C. Record review of R #254's order dated 05/30/25 revealed foley catheter (a thin, flexible…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Recite from 08/21/24 Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement accurate, person-centered comprehensive care plan for 2 (R #21 and R #33) of 4 (R #21, R #28, R #33, and R #35) residents reviewed for care plans when staff failed to: 1. Ensure R #21 had a fall mat in place next to her bed as indicated in her care plan. 2. Include R #33's diagnosis of dementia and interventions in place to treat R #33's dementia. These deficient practices could likely result in resident injury and staff being unaware of the current and actual needs of the residents. The findings are: R #21 A. Record review of R #21's admission documents, no date, revealed the following: 1. R #21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. 2. R #21 had the following diagnoses: a. History of falling. b. Muscle weakness. c. Cognitive communication deficit (a person has difficulty communicating because of injury to the brain that controls the ability to think). d. Personal history of traumatic brain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Recite from 10/18/24 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received care that meets professional standards for 1 (R #86) of 1 (R #86) resident sampled for limited range of motion, when staff failed to follow the order for compression stockings (specially designed hosiery that provide controlled compression to the legs, promoting blood flow and reducing swelling). This deficient practice could likely result in worsening of resident's edema (excess of watery fluid collecting in the cavities or tissues of the body) or unnecessary pain and discomfort. The findings are: A. On 06/02/25 at 2:55 PM during an interview and observation, R #86 said that she did not have compression stockings on. R #86 said that staff had only put the stockings on a couple of times since she has been in the facility. R #86's legs were swollen and puffy. B. Record review of R #86's orders revealed an order dated 01/26/25 for compression stockings to be put on in the morning before getting dressed for pitting edema for 30 administrations and every 24 hours as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide activities of daily living (ADL) assistance for 2 (R #2 and R #33) of 2 (R #2 and R #23) residents reviewed for ADL care when staff failed to do the following: 1. Assist R #2 with toenail care. 2. Assist R #33 with nail care. This deficient practice is likely to affect the dignity and health of the residents. The findings are: R #2 A. Record review of R #2's admission record, no date revealed the following: 1. R #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. 2. R #2 is diagnosed with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Diabetic Polyneuropathy. B. On 06/03/25 at 9:24 AM, during an interview with R #2 and observation of R #2's foot, she stated that her toenails are long and her great toe on right foot is curving and it hurts. R #2 stated she didn't remember when her toenails were last cut. C. On 06/03/25 02:08 PM, during an interview, CNA # 25 stated nurses' trim residents' nails of residents who are diagnosed with diabetes D. On 06/04/25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to secure a treatment cart for all 69 residents who do not reside in the secure unit (residents were identified by the census list provided by the Administrator on 06/01/25). This deficient practice could result in residents obtaining medication not prescribed to them resulting in adverse side effects. The findings are: A. On 06/01/25 at 9:45 AM, an observation of the facility revealed the treatment cart was in a central location near hall 600 and was unlocked. B. On 06/01/25 at 9:45 AM, during an interview LPN #28 confirmed that the treatment cart was unlocked. C. On 06/01/25 at 9:45 AM, during an interview, with DON confirmed that treatment carts and medications carts should be secured when staff are not present.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Recite from 04/24/24 Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medical records were complete and accurate for 2 (R #14 and R #35) of 4 (R #14, R #21, R #28, and R #35) residents reviewed for documentation accuracy. This deficient practice has the potential to negatively impact on the care staff provided to meet residents' needs due to missing or inaccurate records and resident information. The findings are: R #14 A. Record review of R #14's admission record (no date) revealed the following: 1. R #14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. 2. R #14 has a diagnosis of unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition (mental health disorder characterized by a loss of touch with reality, hallucinations, delusions, disordered thinking and behavioral changes that encompasses a range of disorders that do not fit into specific categories). B. Record review of R #14's physician's orders revealed an order dated 04/08/25 for Abilify (aripiprazole generic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Recite from 04/24/24 Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections when staff failed to implement and follow enhanced barrier precautions (EBP, an infection control intervention) for 2 (R #15 and R #21) of 2 (R #15 and R #21) residents reviewed for infection prevention. If the facility fails to maintain an effective infection control program, then infections could spread to residents throughout the facility, resulting in illness. The findings are: A. Record Review of the [Name of Federal Agency] Enhanced Barrier Precautions in Nursing Homes to Prevent Spread of Multidrug-resistant Organisms (MDROs), dated 03/20/24, revealed the following: 1. MDRO transmission is common in long term care (LTC) facilities. 2. EBP refers to an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of MDRO that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to report allegations of abuse within two hours to the State Agency (SA) for 5 (R #1, R #2, R #16, R #17, and R #18) of 5 (R #1, R #2, R #16, R #17, and R #18) residents sampled for abuse. If the facility fails to report allegations of abuse to the SA within two hours, then residents could likely continue to be abused, suffer serious bodily injury, and/or experience psychosocial distress (unpleasant emotions associated with a highly stressful situation) or worsening of current mental health conditions. The findings are: R #1 and R #2 A. Record review an incident report, dated 08/05/24, revealed the following: 1. The facility submitted a resident-to-resident abuse report to the SA regarding an incident between R #1 and R #2. 2. R #1 used a wheelchair to push R #2 onto his bed. 3. The incident occurred on 08/03/24 at 4:30 PM. 4. The report was submitted to the SA on 08/05/24 at 12:41 PM, not within two hours of the incident. R #16 and R #17 B. Record review an incident report, dated 07/25/24, revealed the following: 1. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide services that meet professional standards of practice for 2 (R #1 and R #19) of 3 (R #1, R #3, and R #19) residents reviewed for medication orders when staff failed to: 1. Obtain orders for R #1 when the resident returned from the emergency room. 2. Enter medication orders for R #19 upon admission. This deficient practice could likely result in worsening of medical conditions. The findings are: R #1 A. Record review of R #1's medical record revealed the following: 1. R #1 was sent to the hospital on [DATE] due to physical aggression. 2. R #1 was discharged from the hospital back to the facility on [DATE] at 11:09 AM. B. Record review of R #'1's emergency department physician note, dated 10/16/24 at 11:13 AM, revealed: 1. Diagnosis urinary tract infection (UTI; an infection in any part of the urinary system.) 2. Medically cleared to discharge to nursing home. 3. Cephalexin (antibiotic) 250mg every 12 hours for five days for UTI. C. Record review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to create an accurate baseline care plan (minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for a resident immediately upon their admission to the facility) within 48 hours of admission for 1 (R #3) of 2 (R #3 and #R #19) residents reviewed for baseline care plans. This deficient practice could likely result in residents not receiving the appropriate care and may place residents at risk of an adverse event (undesirable experience, preventable or non-preventable, that caused harm to a resident because of medical care or lack of medical care) or worsening of current condition after admission. The findings are: A. Record review of R #3's admission Record, no date, revealed the following: 1. R #3 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. 2. R #3's had the following diagnoses: cramp (sustained and painful involuntary muscle contractions) and spasm (involuntary muscle contractions, which can be mild twitching sensations), chronic pain (persistent or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure pharmaceutical services (the direct, responsible provision of medication-related care) were met for 1 (R #3) of 4 (R #1, R #3, R #19, and R #20) residents reviewed for medications when they failed to provide routine medication for a resident. This deficient practice could likely lead to unnecessary pain for the resident. The findings are: A. Record review of R #3's electronic medical record revealed the following: 1. R #3 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. 2. R #3 was transferred to the local emergency room on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #3's Physician orders revealed: 1. An order, dated 10/04/24, for pregabalin (medication is used to treat pain caused by nerve damage), 75mg. Give one capsule by mouth at bedtime for nerve pain. 2. An order, dated 10/05/24, for pregabalin, 50mg. Give one capsule by mouth one time a day for nerve pain. B. Record review of R #3's Medication Administration Record (MAR; form used to documentation medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop an accurate, person-centered comprehensive care plan for 2 (R #2 and R #21) of 5 (R #1, R #2, R #3, R #21, and R #22) residents reviewed for care plans. This deficient practice could likely result in staff being unaware of the current and actual needs of the residents. The findings are: R #2 A. Record review of R #2's admission Record (no date) revealed the following 1. R #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. 2. R #2 diagnoses is as follows: a. bipolar disorder (serious mental illness characterized by extreme mood swings, that can include extreme excitement episodes or extreme depressive feelings) b. depression (mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). B. Record review of R #2's Care Plan dated 05/23/24 revealed the following: 1. R #2 has a behavior problem r/t (related to) anxiety (an emotion characterized by feelings of tension, worried thoughts, and physical changes like increased blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure care plan revision occurred for 1 (R #21) of 3 (R #1, R #21, and R #22) residents reviewed for care plans, when they failed to update R #21's care plan after he fell. This deficient practice could likely result in the care plan not being updated with the most current resident conditions and appropriate interventions, staff being unaware of changes in care provided, and residents not receiving the care related to changes in their health status or healthcare decisions. The findings are: A. Record review of R #21's medical record revealed R #21 was admitted on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #21's progress notes, dated 05/05/24, revealed R #21 fell in the bathroom. C. Record review of R #21's care plan, dated 04/23/24, revealed the following: 1. R #21 was a high risk for falls. 2. Staff did not revise R #21's care plan to include R #21's fall on 05/05/24. 3. Staff did revise R #21's care plan to include interventions to prevent R #21 from falling…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-04-24 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — widespread
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to safeguard resident medical record information for all 101 residents (residents were identified by the census provided by the Administrator on 04/15/24). This deficient practice could likely result in the residents' information being viewed by unauthorized residents, visitors, and staff. The findings are: A. On 04/15/24 at 2:35 PM, during an observation of the medication cart it revealed that the computer on the medication cart was open and the screen was not locked. All resident information was visible. B. On 04/15/24 at 2:39 PM, during an interview, LPN #11 confirmed that the computer was left open with resident information visible. C. On 04/24/24 at 5:05 PM, during an interview, the DON confirmed that the computer screen should be locked when not in the direct control of staff so that resident information is not accessible.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-04-24 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — widespread
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to maintain a grievance policy that maintained records of grievances results for up to three years. This has the potential to affect all 101 residents in the facility (residents were identified by the resident matrix provided by the Administrator on 04/15/24). If the facility does not maintain a grievance policy, then resident concerns could go without resolution leaving residents depressed and anxious. The findings are: A. On 04/19/24 at 9:58 AM, during an interview the Social Services Director (SSD) was asked if she had grievances from the previous year 2023, The SSD stated that she throws out the grievances at the end of the calendar year. The SSD confirmed she did not have any grievances for the year 2023 B. Record review of the facility's Grievances/Complaint, Filling Policy revised date April 2017, revealed the results of all grievances files investigated and reported will be maintained on file for a minimum of three years from the issuance of the grievance decision.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a clean, sanitary area for food storage and preparation of food and a holding temperature for puree cold foods at 41 degrees Fahrenheit or lower. This deficient practice is likely to affect all 100 residents (residents were identified by the census provided by the Administrator on 04/15/24) could likely lead to foodborne illnesses (illness caused by food contaminated with bacteria, viruses, parasites, or toxins) if: food is stored or prepared in unsanitary conditions and is not held at a temperature outside the danger zone (the temperature range where bacteria grow at a rapid rate, between 41 degrees (°) Fahrenheit (F) and 140° F). The findings are: Kitchen Cleanliness A. On 04/15/24 at 10:21 am, during an observation of the kitchen revealed: 1. Ice machine was dirty with yellowish stains on door. 2. Staff did not have the ice machine cleaning logs (to show the facility is cleaning the ice machine). 3. Oil on fryer with food crumbs inside and around the edges. 4. Two brownish sticky substances on floor and underneath…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-04-24 · tag F0944 — widespread
    Conduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that nursing staff have completed the mandatory QAPI (Quality Assurance/Performance Improvement) training for 5 (ADON #1, ADON #2, CNA #21, LPN #24, and CNA #31) of 5 (ADON #1, ADON #2, CNA #21, LPN #24, and CNA #31) staff randomly sampled for staffing. This deficient practice could likely result in staff being unable to identify opportunities for improvement, address gaps in systems or processes, develop and implement an improvement or corrective plan, and continuously monitor the effectiveness of interventions. The findings are: A. Record review of the employee training file undated revealed that ADON #1 did not complete QAPI training. B. Record review of the employee training file undated revealed that ADON #2 did not complete QAPI training. C. Record review of the employee training file undated revealed that CNA #21 did not complete QAPI training. D. Record review of the employee training file undated revealed that LPN #24 did not complete QAPI training. E. Record review of the employee training file undated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-24 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodations of resident needs for 2 (R #102 and R #359) of 2 (R #102 and R #359) residents reviewed for care when the facility failed to ensure that resident's bedside table with frequently used items and call light were within the resident's reach. This deficient practice could result in the residents' needs not being met, leaving them at risk for accidents and falls. The findings are: R #359 A. On 04/16/24 at 11:47 AM, during an observation and interview of R #359, revealed the call light was hanging on the back of the bed and was not within reach. R #359 confirmed she did not know where the call light was and had to get up to look for it. B. On 04/16/24 at 12:10 PM, during an interview the CNA #31 confirmed R #359 did not have the call light within resident's reach. R #102 C. On 04/17/24 at 2:04 PM, during an observation of R #102 room revealed the bedside table with a pitcher was across the room and not within the resident's reach. D. On 04/17/24 at 2:06 PM during an interview the ADON #2 confirmed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-24 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — pattern
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the provider of a change in condition for 1 (R #108) of 1 (R #108) residents reviewed for change of condition, when they failed to notify the facility provider about R #108's nausea. This deficient practice could likely result in residents not receiving necessary care or a delay in treatment. The findings are: A. Record review of R #108's face sheet, revealed R #108 was admitted on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #108's physician progress note dated 11/28/23, revealed resident had a diagnosis of chronic kidney disease (a condition in which the kidneys are damaged and cannot filter blood as well as they should) stage 3 (mild to moderate loss of kidney function). C. Record review of R #108's physician's orders revealed Bactrim (an antibiotic used to treat ear infections, urinary tract infections, and other infections) 800-160 mg was started on 01/15/24 for a diagnosis of UTI. D. Record review of nursing progress note dated 01/15/24, revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to provide a home-like environment for all 16 residents in the secure unit (residents were identified by the resident Matrix provided by the Administrator on 04/15/24) when they left resident meals and drinks on the serving trays during the lunch meal for all 16 residents. This deficient practice could likely cause residents to feel depressed and anxious that they are not living in a comfortable home-like environment. The findings are: A. On 04/15/24 at 11:59 AM, during an observation of the lunch meal on the secure unit revealed the following: 1. CNA #21 and the Activities Assistant were passing out meals in the dining room. 2. CNA #21 and the Activities Assistant placed the plastic serving trays with meals, in front of each resident in the dining room. 3. CNA #21 and the Activities Assistant distributed meals to the resident's rooms. 4. CNA #21 and the Activities Assistant placed the plastic serving trays with meals, on the bedside table of each resident in the resident rooms. B. On 04/15/24 at 12:13 PM, during an interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to report an allegations of abuse or neglect within two hours to the State Agency (SA) for 1 (R #66) of 1 (R #66) residents sampled for abuse and accidents. If the facility fails to report allegations of abuse or neglect to the SA within two hours, then residents could likely continue to be abused or suffer serious bodily injury. The findings are: A. On 04/16/24 at 10:08 am, during an interview, R #66 said that she had been assaulted while sitting in her room. R #66 said she did not remember when. B. Record review of the Health Facility Incident Report dated 02/29/24, revealed the following: 1. R #20 and R #66 got in an argument over a a water mug. 2. R #20 scratched R #66 on the face during the incident. 3. R #66 had scratch marks on her face. 4. The time of the incident was 02/28/24 at 1:00 pm. 5. Date the report was sent to the SA on 02/29/24 at 8:50 am (outside the two hours reporting time). C. On 04/17/24 at 3:02 pm, during an interview, the Administrator said that an allegation of abuse must be reported within two hours.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-24 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure that residents and their representatives received a written notice of transfer as soon as practicable for 1 ( R #89) of 3 (R #82, R #86, and R #89) residents reviewed for hospitalization. This deficient practice could likely result in the resident and/or their representative not knowing the reason or location the resident was discharged . The findings are: A. Record review of the nursing progress note dated 02/03/24, revealed R #89 was transferred to the hospital after a fall on 02/03/24. B. Record review of R #89's nursing progress note dated 04/06/24, revealed R #89 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] due to bruising on chest and abdomen. C. Record review of the nursing progress note dated 04/09/24, revealed R #89 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] for extreme agitation. D. Record review of R #89's medical record revealed staff did not provide a written transfer notice to R #89 or his representative for R #89's transfer to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-24 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that residents and their representatives received a written notice of the bed hold policy which indicated the duration the bed would be held for 3 (R #82, R #86, and R #89) of 3 (R #82, R #86, and R #89) residents reviewed for hospitalization. This deficient practice could likely result in the resident and/or their representative being unaware of the bed hold policy upon return from the hospital. The findings are: R #82 A. Record review of R #82's nursing progress note dated 03/21/24, revealed R #82 was transferred to the hospital for behavioral changes on 03/21/24. B. Record review of R #82's medical record revealed R #82's medical record did not contain a written notice of bed hold policy for the transfer on 03/21/24. C. On 04/23/24 at 9:33 AM, during an interview with the Administrator, he stated that R #82 did not receive a written bed hold notice for his transfer to the hospital on [DATE] because R #82 returned to the facility the same day.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-24 · tag F0637 — pattern
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete and transmit (electronically sending encoded information) a Significant Change (major decline or improvement in the patient's health status) Minimum Data Set assessment within 14 days after the facility determined a significant change in the resident's physical or mental condition for 1 (R #30) of 2 (R #30 and R #31) residents reviewed for MDS assessment timing. This deficient practice could likely result in the resident not receiving the appropriate care and services they need. The findings are: A. Record review of R #6's Physician's Orders dated 02/24/24 revealed: admit to [name of company] hospice. B. Record review of R #6's change of condition MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed that the MDS assessment was not completed and signed off by the Registered Nurse (RN) until 04/03/24. C. On 04/24/23 at 3:31 PM, during an interview with the MDS Coordinator and the Regional MDS(RMDS) coordinator, the RMDS confirmed that R #6's Significant change…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-24 · tag F0638 — pattern
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that an Minimum Data Set (MDS) was completed every three months for 3 (R #13, R #68, and R #73) of 5 (R #13, R #29, R #58, R #68, and R #73) resident reviewed for MDS assessments, when they failed to complete quarterly MDS assessments timely (completed 14 days after the assessment reference date (ARD)). This failed practice could result in residents assessments being outdated and residents not receiving care and treatment that meets their current needs. The findings are: A. Record review of R #13's quarterly MDS assessment revealed the following: 1. ARD date of 03/08/24. 2. Completion date 04/10/24. B. Record review of R #68's quarterly MDS assessment revealed the following: 1. ARD date of 03/08/24. 2. Completion date 04/10/24. C. Record review of R #73's quarterly MDS assessment revealed the following: 1. ARD date of 03/07/24. 2. Completion date 04/10/24. D. On 04/23/24 at 1:14 PM, during an interview, the Regional MDS Coordinator (RMSC) confirmed that R #13's, R 36's, and R #73's MDS assessments were not completed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-24 · tag F0655 — pattern
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan within 48 hours, that accurately reflected the resident's current condition for 2 (R #100 and R #359) of 3 (R #100, R #359 and R #310) residents sampled for baseline care plans. This deficient practice could likely result in residents not receiving the appropriate care and services and may place residents at risk of an adverse event (an event, preventable or nonpreventable, that caused harm to a patient as a result of medical care or lack of medical care) or worsening of current condition after admission. The findings are: R #100 A. Record review of R #100's face sheet revealed, R #100 was admitted on [DATE]. B. Record review of Baseline Care Plan dated 03/04/24, revealed the plan was initiated (effective) on 03/04/24 (not within 48 hours of admission). C. On 04/24/24 at 12:16 PM, during an interview with the MDS Nurse, she confirmed the following: 1. The baseline care plan should be created upon admission by the admitting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for 2 (R #9, and R #108) of 2 (R #9, and R #108) residents sampled for care plans. This deficient practice could likely result in staff being unaware of the needs of residents. The findings are: R #9 A. On 04/15/24 at 11:35 AM, during an interview, R #9 revealed the following: 1. She said she wears dentures, and they feel uncomfortable and fit her loosely. She does not wear them and stores them in her drawer. 2. She said she has glaucoma (group of eye conditions that damage the optic nerve) and it has been getting worse since a year and a half ago. She has eye drops. R #9 said the nurse eye drops are given by the nurse more than twice a day. B. Record review of R #9's physician's order revealed the following: 1. 09/16/23 Xalatan Ophthalmic Solution 0.005 %, one drop in both eyes at bedtime for pre-glaucoma. C. Record review of R #9's care plan dated 03/11/24 revealed the following: 1. Staff did not document R #9's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-24 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the care plan had been revised for 4 (R #66, R #86, R #88, and R #108) of 5 (R #62, R #66, R #86, R #88, and R #108) residents reviewed by: 1. Not revising R #66's care plan to reflect that she was not in the secured unit. 2. Not revising R #86's care plan to include his diagnosis of seizures. 3. Not revising R #88's care plan to include medications and orders for wounds. 4. Not revising R #108's care plan to include her diagnosis of urinary tract infection (UTI, an infection in any part of the urinary system). This deficient practice could likely result in staff being unaware of changes in care provided, and residents not receiving the care related to changes in their health status or healthcare decisions. The findings are: R #66 A. Record review of R #66's care plan 02/06/24 revealed, R #66 was care planned for being in the secured unit. B. Record review of R #66's medical record not dated revealed: 1. R #66 was admitted on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-24 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight for 1 (R #62) of 2 (R #25 and R #62) residents sampled for nutrition, when they failed to follow dietitian's order. This deficient practice could likely result in residents losing weight without the facility being aware causing physical and mental health issues. The findings are: A. Record review of R #62's Nutrition Assessment by the Registered Dietician (A resident's attending physician may delegate the task of writing dietary orders to a qualified dietitian or other clinically qualified nutrition professional.). dated 03/06/24, revealed the following: 1. R #62 had a decreased oral intake. 2. A health shake was order three times a day. B. Record review of R #62's medical record revealed, the record did not contain an order for a health shake, three times a day. C. On 04/22/24 at 3:48 PM, during an interview, the Dietary Manager (DM) confirmed that the health shake for R #62 was not ordered, and that R #62 was not getting the health shake…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-24 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to effectively (use of different techniques and medication to reduce and control the amount of pain a person experiences) manage pain for 1 (R #22) of 1 (R #22) residents reviewed for pain when staff did not assess for pain and provide pain treatment. This deficient practice could likely result in residents experiencing unnecessary pain. The findings are: A. On 04/16/24 at 10:58 AM, during an interview, R #22 stated she had not taken her pain medication (Tylenol #4; acetaminophen with codeine combination opioid medication used to treat moderate to severe pain) since the beginning of April and had been seen by the pain specialist on 04/15/24. R #22 stated I have pain all the time. R #22 stated her pain level was currently at a 7, and ranges from 5-10 daily, (1 to 10 scale: 1 least and 10 worst pain). B. On 04/18/24 at 5:53 PM, during an interview, R #22 stated pain scale is currently at a 6. The pain usually averages at five and can be at 10 when she does…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-24 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff adequately monitored medications for 1 (R #86) of 5 (R #1, R #86, R #88, R #89, and R #359) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, when they failed to monitor R #86's antiseizure medication levels as ordered by the physician. If the facility is not adequately monitoring medication levels in the blood, then residents are likely to be at risk of agitation, drowsiness, difficulty breathing, and/or behavior changes. The findings are: A. Record review of R #86's physician's orders revealed the following: 1. An order dated 01/26/24, for levetiracetam (medication used alone or together with other medicines to help control certain types of seizures in the treatment of epilepsy) oral tablet 1000 milligram (mg, unit of mass equal to 1/1000 gram) twice a day for seizure disorder. 2. An order dated 01/26/24, for oxcarbazepine (medication used in the treatment of partial seizures) oral tablet 300 mg, twice a day, for epilepsy (a disorder in which nerve cell activity in the brain is disturbed, causing seizures). 3.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-24 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents did not receive unnecessary psychotropic medications (any drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) for 3 (R #86, R #89 and R #359) of 5 (R #1, R #86, R #88, R #89, and R #359) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications when they failed to document appropriate diagnosis in the resident medical record for psychotropic medications. This deficient practice is likely to result in residents being administered medications they do not need and could likely suffer from adverse side effects (unwanted, harmful, or abnormal result). The findings are: R #86 A. Record review of R #86's physician's orders revealed the following: 1. R #86 had an order dated 04/05/24, for Seroquel (an antipsychotic medication used to manage psychosis (A mental disorder characterized by a disconnection from reality)) 25 milligram, twice a day for agitation/anxiety. 2. R #86 had an order dated 03/11/24, for mirtazapine (antidepressant medication used in the treatment of major depressive disorder),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-24 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medical records were complete and accurate for 2 (R #1 and R #108) of 2 (R #1 and R #108) residents reviewed for documentation accuracy. This deficient practice has the potential to negatively impact the care staff provide to meet residents' needs due to missing or inaccurate records. The findings are: R #1 A. Record review of R #1's physician's orders, dated 03/18/24, revealed an order for Eliquis (medication used to treat and prevent blood clots and to prevent stroke) Oral Tablet 5 MG related to acute embolism (blockage of an artery) and thrombosis (blood clot) of superficial veins of left upper extremity (region of the body that includes the arm, forearm, wrist and hand). B. On 04/24/24 at 3:09 PM, during an interview with the DON, she confirmed the following: R #1 has a history of CVA (cerebrovascular accident) (stroke) and coronary artery disease (CAD) and presence of coronary angioplasty implant (treats vessels, called coronary arteries,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 6 (R #25, R #30, R #82, R #94, R #109, and R #359) of 6 (R #25, R #30, R #82, R #94, R #109, and R #359) when they failed to have: 1) PPE (personal protective equipment equipment designed to protect from infection) was available for R #25, R #30, R #82, R #94, and R #109, who were on enhanced barrier precautions (refer to an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (bacteria that are resistant to three or more classes of antimicrobial drugs) that require gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities). 2) Staff wear eye protection when entering R #359 room who had Covid-19 (is an infectious disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus). 3) Staff document findings made during process surveillance (the review of practices by staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-24 · tag F0887 — pattern
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to offer Covid-19 (is an infectious disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus) vaccinations to 1 (R #1) of 5 (R #1, R #60, R #71, R #82, and R #88) residents sampled for Covid-19 vaccination. This deficient practice could result in residents getting Covid-19 resulting in other illnesses or death. The findings are: A. Record review of R #1's entire medical record, revealed that the staff failed to document that they offered Covid-19 vaccinations to R #1. B. On 04/24/24 at 3:28 PM, during an interview, the DON confirmed that the staff did not document if R #1 was offered the Covid-19 vaccination.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-24 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set Assessment was accurate for 1 (R #31) of 5 (R #2, R #6, R #22, R #31, and R #32) residents review for MDS assessment accuracy. This deficient practice could likely result in the facility not having an accurate assessment of the residents' needs. The findings are: A. Record review of R #31's admission Record revealed the following diagnoses: 1. Huntington's disease ( a condition that leads to progressive degeneration of nerve cells in the brain that affects movement, cognitive functions, and emotions). 2. Need for assistance with personal care (assistance and provided to individuals in performing daily living tasks and maintaining personal hygiene). 3. Reduced mobility (decrease in the ability to move or alternate positions). A. Record review of R #31's physician orders revealed the following: 1. Order date 01/19/24, NPO (nothing by mouth) diet. 2. Order date 01/23/24, Jevity 1.2 (calorically dense, high-protein,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-24 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received proper treatment to maintain vision for 1 (R #9) of 2 (R #9 and R #30) residents reviewed for vision and hearing. This deficient practice could likely result in residents losing some independence if they cannot see, compromising their quality of life. The findings are: A. Record review of R #9's medical record revealed R #9's diagnosis of pre-glaucoma. B. On 04/15/24 at 11:35 AM, during an interview R #9 revealed the following: 1. She said she has glaucoma (group of eye conditions that damage the optic nerve) and it has been getting worse since a year in a half ago. She has not seen a eye doctor. C. On 04/18/24 at 11:10 AM, during an interview with Social Services (SS) confirmed she has not made any appointments for R #9 to see the eye doctor. SS confirmed that R #9 has not had any eye doctor appointments.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-24 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the nutritional needs and preferences were met for 1 (R #66) of 4 (R #25, R #62, R #66 and R #87) residents by not following the menu. This deficient practice is likely to result in resident weight loss and frustration. The findings are: A. Record review of R #66's food ticket (what the resident was served for that meal) for 04/18/24 revealed: 1. Egg Salad 2. Crackers 3. Cucumber Dill Salad 4. Soft Chocolate Chip Cookie Bar B. On 04/18/24 at 5:54 PM, during an observation of dinner service R #66 was not served crackers and a soft chocolate chip cookie bar. (R #66 is blind and not able to see what she is served to notice what is missing). C. On 04/18/24 at 6:02 PM, during an interview, LPN #11 confirmed R #66 only had egg salad and cucumber dill salad on her tray. LPN #11 confirmed that R #66 was supposed to have crackers and a soft chocolate chip cookie bar.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-24 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — pattern
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure could provide cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) (can help save a life during cardiac arrest, when the heart stops beating or beats too ineffectively to circulate blood to the brain and other vital organs) during an emergency for 3 (R #100, R #108, and R #309) of 3 (R #100, R #108, and R #309) residents reviewed for advanced directives, when they failed to ensure staff: 1) Knew and followed facility protocols for determining residents code status [the residents choice as to whether or not they would like to be provided CPR in the event that they stopped breathing and/or their heart stopped]. 2) Had resident code status available for staff use during an emergency. This deficient practice is likely to delay potentially lifesaving measures or cause residents to undergo CPR against their wishes, causing unnecessary suffering. The findings are: R #100 A. Record review of R #100's face sheet, revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. B.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-24 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure call lights in the residents' bathrooms were adequately equipped to allow residents to call for help using the call light system, for 17 (R #7, R #8, R #9, R #10, R #11, R #12, R #13, R #14, R #15, R #16, R #17, R #18, R #19, R #20, R #21, R #22, R #23) of 17 (R #7, R #8, R #9, R #10, R #11, R #12, R #13, R #14, R #15, R #16, R #17, R #18, R #19, R #20, R #21, R #22, R #23) residents randomly sampled for call light function, when the facility failed to have proper length pull cords for the call light system in the resident's bathrooms. This deficient practice could likely result in residents being unable to call for assistance in the bathrooms in the event of a fall to the floor. The findings are: A. On 10/17/23 at 11:08 AM, observation of the bathroom pull cords in residents' rooms on the 300 Hallway (R #7's, R #8's, R #9's, R #10's, R #11's, R #12's, R #13's, R #14's, R #15's, R #16's, R #17's, R #18's, R #19's, R #20's, R #21's, R #22's, and R #23's rooms) revealed the pull cords were too short to be accessible to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to send the initial report of an allegation of neglect to the State Agency in the proper timeframes for 1 (R #1) of 6 (R #1, R #2, R #3, R #4, R #5, & R #6) residents sampled for neglect. This deficient practice could likely result in residents suffering physically from receiving inappropriate care. The finding are: A. On 10/16/23 at 2:15 PM, during a phone interview, R #1's daughter stated the following: 1. She received a phone call from the nurse at the facility on 06/02/23 at 10:00 PM stating that R #1 received another resident's medications along with her own and was being sent to the hospital. 2. R #1 was hospitalized for a few days, and three of those days were in the ICU (Intensive Care Unit). B. Record review of R #1's Nursing Progress Notes revealed: 1. On 06/02/23, R #1 received another resident's medications which were sucralfate (medication used to treat duodenal ulcers) 1 GM (gram, unit of measure), melatonin (supplement given to regulate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-04-06 · tag F0577 — widespread
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and observation, the facility failed to ensure residents knew where the most recent survey was located. This could affect the 72 residents (identified by the facility census provided by the Administrator on 04/27/23). If residents are unable to locate the latest survey conducted by State Surveyors, then residents, representatives, and visitors are unable to know how the facility is doing and make decisions accordingly. The findings are: A. On 03/30/2302:13 PM, during the resident council meeting interview, R #3, R #10, R #33, R #41, R #45, R #54, R #57 revealed: 1. Residents were not aware that they have access to the most recent Survey results. 2. The residents did not know where the latest survey results were located. B. On 03/30/23 3:17 PM, during an observation of the front lobby revealed a displayed Survey binder. C. On 04/05/23 at 4:33 PM during an interview, the Administrator confirmed that the resident's have a right to know and have access to the previous Survey results.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with respect and dignity for 3 (R #34, R #40, and R #220) of 7 (R #01, R #34, R #40, R #42, R #64, R #44, and R #220) residents randomly sampled, when the facility failed to: 1. Ensure Staff are speaking in a language that R #34 understands while receiving patient care, 2. Ensure R #40 has sheets on his bed, 3. Ensure R #220's room is free of odor, These deficient practices are likely to result in residents feeling embarrassed, ashamed, and that their feelings and preferences are unimportant to the facility staff. The findings are: R #34 A. On 03/28/23 at 2:10 PM, during an interview with R #34 and his wife revealed that 2 female CNAs will speak Spanish to each other while providing patient care to R #34. This makes the resident feel very uncomfortable because he doesn't understand what they are saying or if they are talking about him. They also disclosed reporting this to the Activity Director during a Resident Council meeting last month but the CNAs continue to Speak in Spanish…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to protect residents against the loss of resident's personal property for 3 (R #16, R #41 and R #64) of 3 (R #16, R #41 and R #64) residents reviewed for loss of personal property. This deficient practice could likely cause the resident and/or the resident's family frustration with loss of personal belongings and a financial burden of having to purchase those items again. The findings are: A. On 03/27/23 at 2:59 PM, during an interview R #41 stated that her only pair of jeans are missing and have been missing for months. She also said that laundry goes missing all the time and she has reported it and is told, they are looking for the items. They have not found or replaced the items. B. On 03/28/23 at 1:22 PM, during an interview R #64's wife it was said that R #64's laundry has gone missing since he has been there (12/08/23) and that there are still items that have not been found. She further stated that the items that were not found have not been replaced. C. On 03/30/23 at 3:57 PM, during an interview R #16 stated that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-04-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews the facility failed to keep residents free from abuse for 4 (R #16 and R #21, R #64 and R #220) of 4 (R #16 and R #21, R #64 and R #220) residents reviewed for abuse and neglect, when the facility failed to protect: 1. R #16 from mental anguish (mental suffering which includes fright, feelings of distress, anxiety, depression, grief and/or psychosomatic physical symptoms) from PTA #11 (Physical Therapist Assistant) after she became angry that R #16 did not want to do therapy. 2. R #21 from physical abuse when PTA #11 physically attempted to force R #21 into the therapy room. 3. R #64 from physical abuse when PTA #11 pounded on R #64's contracted hand (condition that causes one or more fingers to bend toward the palm of the hand) to flatten it. 4. R #220 from abuse when PTA #11 attempted to manipulate a joint that had been immobile (A type of joint between bones in which there is no joint cavity, and with very little or no movement is possible under normal conditions) for ten years. These deficient practices could likely result in residents having anger, fear, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-06 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the resident/resident's representative(s) of the transfer and the reasons for the move in writing for 3 (R #10, R #17, and R #47) of 3 (R #10, R #17, and R #47) residents sampled for hospitalizations. This deficient practice could likely result in the resident and/or their representative not knowing the reason for the transfer and their rights to advocate and make informed decision regarding their healthcare. The findings are: R #10 A. Record review of R #10's Progress Notes revealed the following: 1. R #10 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] for a fall. B. Record review of R #10's medical record revealed no written Transfer Notice. R #17 C. Record review of R #17's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed: 1. On 03/04/23 R #17 was sent to the Hospital for Shortness of Breath (SOB) and pain. 2. On 03/11/23 Respiratory infection Shortness of Breath (SOB). 3 On 3/27/23 GI bleed (Gastrointestinal bleeding is a symptom of a disorder in your…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-06 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide written information to the resident or resident representative that specifies the bed hold policy at the time of the transfer for 3 (R #10, R #17, and R #47) of 3 (R #10, R #17, and R #47) residents sampled for hospitalizations. This deficient practice could likely result in the resident and/or their representative being unaware of the resident being able to return to their previous room or the next available room upon return from the hospital. The findings are: R #10 A. Record review of R #10's Progress Notes revealed the following: 1. R #10 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] for a fall. 2. No written Bed Hold Policy Notice was found. R #17 B. Record review of R #17's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed: 1. On 03/04/23 R #17 was sent to the Hospital for Shortness of Breath (SOB) and pain. 2. On 03/11/23 Respiratory infection Shortness of Breath (SOB). 3 On 3/27/23 GI bleed (Gastrointestinal bleeding is a symptom of a disorder in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-06 · tag F0637 — pattern
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete a significant change (major decline or improvement in the patient's health status) MDS (Minimum Data Set; assessment) in a timely manner (within 14 days after the facility determines, or should have determined, that there has been a significant change in the resident's physical or mental condition) for 2 (R #31 and R #42) of 2 (R #31 and R #42) residents sampled for Hospice (care that focuses on alleviating symptoms of the terminally ill). This deficient practice could likely result in the resident not receiving the appropriate care and services they need. The findings are: R #31 A. Record review of R #31's Physician's Orders revealed, on 08/22/22; R #22 was placed on Hospice. B. Record review of R #31's MDS Assessment revealed no Change of Condition MDS was located. C. On 03/30/23 at 8:30 AM during an interview, the Cooperate Nurse confirmed that the facility did not do a Change in Condition MDS for R #19 for Hospice admission on [DATE]. R…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-04-06 · tag F0640 — pattern
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to have MDS documents completed, submitted, and finalized in a timely manner (within 14 days of completion) for 2 (R #64 and R #219) of 2 (R #64 and R #219) residents randomly reviewed for Minimum Data Set (MDS; tool for implementing standardized assessment and for facilitating care management in nursing homes) assessments. If MDS assessments are not completed, submitted, and finalized in a timely manner, it is likely that residents will receive less than optimal care: The findings are: A. Record review of R #64's admission record revealed that R #64 was admitted on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #64's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed MDS Status: Export Ready (completed but not submitted) C. Record review of R #219's admission record revealed that R #219 was admitted on [DATE]. D. Record review of R #219's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed MDS Status: Export Ready E. On 04/05/23 at 5:02 PM, during an interview with DON, she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-06 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments were accurate for 2 (R #47 and R #58) of 2 (R #47 and R #58) residents sampled for MDS accuracy 1. When Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) was included as an active diagnosis for R #47 2. When they failed to capture the severity of R #58's vision problems. These deficient practices could likely result in residents not receiving the care and treatment they need. The findings are: R #47 A. Record review of R #47's Quarterly MDS completed 01/26/23 revealed PTSD marked off as an active diagnosis. B Record review of R #47's admission Record (no date) Diagnosis information did not include PTSD as a diagnosis. C. Record Review of R #47's Behavioral medicine outpatient Services (provides individualized treatment for adults who suffer from emotional, behavioral or mental health disorders). Progress note for 03/28/23 revealed no diagnosis of PTSD. D. On 04/05/23 at 4:47 PM, during an interview, the DON stated I believe it (PTSD diagnosis) was entered on the MDS in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 ( R #44) of 5 (R #9, R #17, R #40, R #44, and R #169) residents reviewed for Comprehensive Care Plans. Failure to develop a person-centered care plan is likely to result in staff's failure to understand the needs and treatments for residents to achieve their highest level of well-being. The findings are: R #44 A. Record review of R#44's Minimum Data Set assessment completed on 02/28/23 revealed: 1. Section K; Nutritional approaches: Check all of the following nutritional approaches that were performed during the last 7 days: a. Feeding tube (therapy where a feeding tube delivers nutrition directly to your stomach) was marked yes, while NOT a resident and yes, while a resident. 2. Section K; Percent Intake by Artificial Route (nutrition that is not provided through the mouth or by chewing): a. Proportion of total calories the resident received through parenteral (medical term for infusing a specialized form of food through a vein) or tube feeding was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-04-06 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure appropriate treatment and services for Foley Catheter tubing/Collecting bag (soft plastic or rubber tube that is inserted to the bladder to drain the urine and is connected to a collecting bag) care for 1 (R #221) of 1 (R #221) residents randomly observed when they failed to keep R #221's Foley catheter collecting bag and tubing off the floor. This deficient practice could likely result in residents getting infections. The findings are: A. On 03/29/23 at 10:58 AM, during an observation R #221's catheter tubing was dragging on the floor while sitting in his room. LPN #11 confirmed that R #221's foley tubing was dragging on the floor and shouldn't be. B. On 03/29/23 at 1:28 PM, during an observation of the physical therapy room, Physical Therapist #11 was transferring R #221 from one wheelchair to another and removed the catheter bag from the wheelchair and laid it on the floor. After transferring R #221, Physical Therapist #11 picked the catheter up off the floor and attached it to the wheelchair that R #221 had been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-04-06 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to conduct Nurse Aide performance review at least every 12 months and failed to provide evidence of CNA's completion of the required 12 hours per year In-Services for 3 (CNA #11, CNA #12, and CNA #13) of 3 (CNA #11, CNA #12, and CNA #13). This failed practice could lead to residents not receiving the appropriate care to meet their individual needs. The findings are: A. Record review of personnel files of CNA #11, CNA #12 and CNA #13, revealed no documentation of Nurse Aid Performance Reviews. The facility could not provide documentation that the Nurse Aide Performance review (yearly evaluation of the Nurse Aids performances) have been completed. B. On 04/15/21 at 3:30 pm, during an interview, the DON confirmed they were not able to locate any documented nursing staff trainings or evaluations. The DON stated that [Name of Previous Company] were throwing away documents and trainings for staff can not be confirmed.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-06 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that consultant pharmacists recommendations were reviewed and implemented by the physician or ensure that the physician provides rationale for not following the recommendation for 2 (R #9 and R #42) ) of 5 (R #9, R #30, R #41, R #42, and R #64) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. This deficient practice could likely result in residents receiving medications that are no longer necessary and may cause unnecessary drug interactions or adverse side effects. The findings are: R #9 A. Record review of pharmacy consultation report for R #9 dated 01/20/23 revealed: 1.[name of resident] receives 3 or more CNS (central nervous system; consists of the brain and spinal cord and is responsible for integrating and coordinating the activities of the entire body) active medications which can cause a risk for falls and fractures Please reevaluate the combination and attempt a trial D/C (discontinuation) of Divalproex (an anticonvulsant that works in the brain tissue to stop seizures, also used to treat the manic phase of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-04-06 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was 5% or less when medications were not given and the wrong medication was given for 4 (R #7, R #41, R #49, and R #56) of 10 (R #2, R #7, R #10, R #13, R #25, R #38, R #41, R #49, R #53, and R #56) residents observed during medication pass. This deficient practice could likely result in residents not receiving the desired therapeutic effect and exposing residents to a higher risk of adverse side effects (unwanted, harmful, or abnormal result). The findings are: A. RN #2 was observed conducting morning medication pass from 7:02 AM through 9:05 AM. R #7 B. On 04/04/23 at 8:42 AM, during observation of medication pass RN # 2 did not administer any inhaled medication to R #7. C. Record review of R #7's Physician's orders revealed: Order Date 03/02/23; (hour scheduled 8:00 AM)Breo Ellipta Inhalation Aerosol Powder (medication used to prevent and decrease symptoms (wheezing and trouble breathing) caused by asthma and ongoing lung disease such as chronic obstructive pulmonary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Recite from a complaint survey dated 03/31/23 Based on observation and interview the facility failed to properly store medications in the medication carts for all 72 residents (residents were identified by the resident matrix provided by the Administrator on 03/27/23) that were randomly sampled, when they failed to: 1. Secure the medication carts on the 500 unit. 2. Ensure medications were not expired (expired medications can be less effective or risky due to a decrease in strength) Memory Care Unit Medication Cart. These deficient practices could result in residents obtaining medication not prescribed to them and residents having adverse side effects. The findings are: Medication Cart 500 Unit A. On 03/28/23 at 2:29 PM during observation of the 500 Unit, RN #21 walked away from his medication cart, leaving it unsecured. B. On 03/28/23 at 3:42 PM during an interview, the DON confirmed that the medication cart must remain secure when nurse steps away. C. On 04/04/23 at 11:01 AM, during an observation of 500 Unit revealed the medication cart unlocked, no staff were present. D. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to practice proper infection control practices, when they failed to perform proper hand hygiene in the dining room while assisting 2 (R #19 and R #28) of 2 (R #19 and R #28) residents randomly observed during dining. This deficient practice is likely to result in the spread of infections and illness. The findings are: A. On 03/27/23 at 12:29 PM during the lunch time dining observation revealed CNA #22 was observed feeding R #19 and R #28 and no hand hygiene was being done in between each task. B. On 03/27/23 at 12:36 PM during an interview, CNA #22 revealed she has had hand hygiene and infection control training and did not disclose why she did not perform hand hygiene. C. On 04/05/23 at 4:37 PM during an interview, the DON confirmed that staff should be doing hand hygiene between feeding more than 1 resident at a time to prevent the spread of germs.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-04-06 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — pattern
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to have required in-service training for nurse aides for 3 (CNA #11, CNA #12, and CNA #13) of 3 (CNA #11, CNA #12, and CNA #13) CNA's sampled for training when they failed to ensure: 1. Dementia management training and resident abuse prevention training were conducted, 2. Annual trainings are based, in part on facility assessment and performance evaluations. These deficient practices could likely lead to the CNA's not receiving the continuing education needed to provide competent care to the residents. The findings are: A. Record review of personnel files of CNA #11, CNA #12 and CNA #13, revealed that there was no documentation of Dementia management training and resident abuse prevention training. When asked, the facility could not provide documentation that dementia training and resident abuse prevention training had been completed. B. Record review of personnel files of CNA #11, CNA #12 and CNA #13 training transcript revealed that there was no documentation that annual trainings are based, in part on facility assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-06 · tag F0568 — isolated
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide quarterly statements for resident's personal funds for 1 (R #19) of 2 (R #19 and R #64) resident reviewed personal funds entrusted to the facility on the resident's behalf. This deficient practice is likely to cause a resident to be unaware of their personal funds balances. The findings are: A. On 03/27/23 at 3:56 PM, during an interview, R #19 stated that she does not get any of her quarterly statements for her personal funds account. B. On 03/30/23 at 10:26 AM, during an interview, the Business Office Manager confirmed that she never provided a quarterly statement to R #19, instead she was calling R #19's daughter and verbally reported R #19's account balance. C. Record review of Resident Funds: Handling & Recording Policy, revised August 2020 revealed: 1. Provide a means to protect resident funds managed by the Facility; 2. Provide for an individual and confidential accounting of funds received and disbursed on the resident's behalf; 3. Provide a means for the resident to access his or her funds or to have a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-06 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that Advance Directives (legal document that specifies what actions should be taken for their health if they are no longer able to make decisions for themselves because of illness or incapacity) form was completed for 1 (R #169) of 7 (R #3, R #9, R #44, R #46, R #47, R #58, and R #169) residents reviewed for Advance Directives. This deficient practice could likely result in staff being unaware of the medical intervention wishes of residents during an emergency. The findings are: A. Record review of R #169's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed R #169 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #169's EMR on 03/28/23 revealed no MOST (Medical Orders for Scope of Treatment; advance directive) form. C. Record review of Advance Directives Policy-Operational Manual-Social Services; date 08/2020 revealed: Policy: I. At the time of admission, admission staff or designee will inquire about the existence of an advance directive .…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-06 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the resident's representative of an incident for 1 (R #21) of 4 (R #16, R #21, R #64, and R #220) residents reviewed for abuse. This deficient practice could likely result in resident's family members not being able to make decisions related to treatment and/or advocate for the resident's care. The findings are: A. On 03/29/23 at 3:11 PM, the Administrator reported that there was an allegation of abuse regarding R #21 being abused by PTA (Physical Therapist Aid) #11 and witnessed by ADON #1 on 03/27/23. B. On 03/31/23 at 9:22 AM during an interview ADON #1 stated that on 03/27/23, she witnessed PTA #11 grabbing R #21's arms and crossing them and telling her she was going to go to therapy. ADON #1 stated that R #21 is non-verbal and shows she is upset by flailing (to move energetically in an uncontrolled way) and movement. R #21 was flailing and moving. PTA #11 kept grabbing at R #21's arms forcefully. ADON #1 stated she did not like the way PTA #11 was grabbing R #21 and told her to leave the resident alone several…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-06 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to report to the State Survey Agency an allegation of abuse for one 1 (R #21) of 4 (R #16, R #21, R #64, and R#220) residents sampled for abuse, when they failed to report the allegation of R #21's abuse within two hours to the State Agency. If the facility fails to report allegations of abuse to the State Agency within two (2) hours, then residents could likely continue to be abused. The findings are: A. On 03/29/23 at 3:11 PM, during interview with the Administrator, it was reported that there was an allegation of abuse regarding R #21 being abused by PTA (Physical Therapist Assitant) #11 and witnessed by ADON #1 and ADON #2 on 03/27/23. B. On 03/30/23 at 4:03 PM, during an interview ADON #2 stated that on 03/27/23 she witnessed the end of the incident with R #21 and PTA #11. ADON #2 acknowledged that ADON #1 was already present with R #21 and PTA #11. ADON #2 stated that R #21, ADON #1 and PTA #11 were all upset and agitated. ADON #2 agreed with ADON #1 to remove R #21 from the situation. ADON #2 stated that PTA #11 became…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-06 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive assessment was completed within 14 calendar days after admission for 1 (R #169) of 1 (R #169) residents randomly sampled for completion of a comprehensive MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment. This deficient practice could likely lead to the residents' preferences and needs not being met. The findings are: A. Record review of R #169's Electronic Medical Record revealed: 1. R #169 was admitted on [DATE] 2. Review of admission MDS revealed a completion date of 03/29/23. B. On 04/05/23 at 4:49 PM, during an interview, the DON confirmed that the admission MDS for R #169 was not completed within 14 days of admission.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-06 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to create a Baseline Care Plan (Plan that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care upon admission) with interventions (actions required by staff to assist resident) within 48 hours of admission for 1 (R #169) of 2 (R #169 and R #217) residents sampled for Baseline Care Plans. This deficient practice could likely result in the resident not receiving the appropriate care and services and may place the resident at risk of an adverse event (An event, preventable or nonpreventable, that caused harm to a patient as a result of medical care or lack of medical care) that could occur after admission. The findings are: A. Record review of R #169's Electronic Medical Record revealed that R #169 was admitted on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #169's revealed Nurse Note 03/02/23 1:00 PM Resident seemed confused and kept asking if there was anything he could do to get out of the facility. Resident not sure why he is here…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 (R #44) of 1 (R #44) resident reviewed for insulin (hormone which regulates the amount of glucose in the blood used to treat diabetes) administration. This deficient practice could likely result in residents not receiving the appropriate care for current diagnosis, correct medication and exposes residents to a higher risk of adverse side effects (unwanted, harmful, or abnormal result). The findings are: A. On 04/04/23 at 8:50 AM, during observation of medication pass, RN #2 administered insulin Lispro (fast-acting medication used to help lower the blood sugar) 10 units (dosage of medication in units) to R #44. B. On 04/04/23 at 8:53 AM, during observation of medication pass, RN #2 used the insulin Lispro pen (medication in a pen like device that can be easily measured and administered) that was labeled for R #23. C. On 04/05/23 at 5:26 pm, during an interview, the DON confirmed that medications are not to be shared…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-06 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure that psychotropic medications (any medication capable of affecting the mind, emotions, and behavior) were not given as PRN (as needed) for more than 14 days for 1 (R #42) of 5 (R #9, R #30, R #41, R #42, and R #64) residents sampled for unnecessary medications, when they failed to discontinue or reevaluate the need for continued use of psychotropic medication. This deficient practice could likely result in residents receiving medications for longer than needed. The findings are: A. Record review of pharmacy Consultation Report dated 02/19/23 revealed (name of R #42) has a PRN order for an anxiolytic (medication used to treat anxiety), which has been in place longer than 14 days without a stop date. If the medication cannot be discontinued at this time, please document the indication for use, the intended duration of therapy and the rationale for the extended period of time. B. Review of R #42's Physician's orders revealed: 1. Order start date 01/31/23 Lorazepam (medication that affects a person's mental state…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-06 · tag F0825 — isolated
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident was receiving restorative rehabilitation (focuses on maximizing an optimal level of functioning, enabling clients to regain/retain their independence following the debilitating effects of illness or injury.) services as ordered by the physician for 1 (R #40) of 1 (R #40) resident reviewed for rehab services. This deficient practice is likely to result in a decrease in residents functional mobility. The findings are: A. On 03/27/23 at 3:24 PM during an interview, R #40 reported that his therapy was stopped and he does not have anyone working with his Range of Motion (ROM) and would like to continue therapy. B. Record review of R #40's Occupational Therapy Discharge summary dated [DATE] revealed: 1. Destination: Long term care setting 2. Discharge reason: Highest Practical Level achieved (the setting in which an individual needs medical or long-term care services.) C. Record review of R #40's Orders revealed: 1. On 09/15/2020 Restorative…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2025-07-14 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to post nurse staffing data on a daily basis for access by the public and all 102 residents (residents were identified by the census list provided by the Administrator on 07/10/25) included the following:1. The total number and the actual hours worked by the following categories of licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift to include: a. Registered Nurses. b. Licensed Practical Nurses. c. Certified Nurse Aides. This deficient practice could likely result in residents not knowing which staff is working. The findings are:A. On 07/10/25 at 1:42 PM, during an observation of the facility, revealed the nurse staffing data posted at the front entrance of the facility did not include the total number of actual nursing staff scheduled and actual hours worked by nursing staff for the day. B. On 07/10/25 at 1:43 PM, during an interview, the Front Desk Clerk (FDC) confirmed she is responsible for posting the nurse staffing data. The FDC confirmed the posted staffing data was not posted on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$124,375 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $108,316 — penalty dated 2024-04-24
  • $16,059 — penalty dated 2023-10-24

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to OPCO SKILLED MANAGEMENT — 66 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.3-1.3 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.2-1.2 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.7-0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.3-0.3 vs chain
The other 65 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
1 of 5Bluebird Wellness And RehabilitationSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Brentwood Place ThreeDallas, TX 1 of 5Broadway Nursing & RehabilitationSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5Cameron Nursing CenterCameron, MO 1 of 5Carmel Hills Wellness & RehabilitationIndependence, MO 1 of 5Casa Maria HealthcareRoswell, NM 1 of 5Forest Park Nursing & RehabilitationDallas, TX 1 of 5Fort Worth Wellness & RehabilitationFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Glenview Wellness & RehabilitationNorth Richland Hills, TX 1 of 5Highland Pines Nursing HomeLongview, TX 1 of 5Ivy Creek Wellness & RehabilitationWaco, TX 1 of 5Las Cruces Village Nursing & Rehabilitation LLCLas Cruces, NM 1 of 5Magnolia Wellness CenterSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Maple Grove Wellness & RehabilitationFenton, MO 1 of 5Mineola Gardens Wellness & RehabilitationMineola, TX 1 of 5Pine Grove ManorSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Rehab Of Kansas City SouthKansas City, MO 1 of 5The Hillcrest Of North DallasDallas, TX 1 of 5West Side Campus Of CareWhite Settlement, TX 1 of 5Willow Ridge Wellness & RehabilitationFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Willowcreek Wellness & RehabilitationFlorissant, MO 2 of 5Arbor Lake Nursing & Rehabilitation, LLCFort Worth, TX 2 of 5Aztec HealthcareAztec, NM 2 of 5Betty Dare Wellness & Rehabilitation LLCAlamogordo, NM 2 of 5Blue Springs Wellness & RehabilitationBlue Springs, MO 2 of 5Cypress Springs Wellness & RehabilitationMount Vernon, TX 2 of 5Fiesta Park Wellness & RehabilitationAlbuquerque, NM 2 of 5Hilltop At Blue River, TheKansas City, MO 2 of 5La Vida Buena HealthcareLas Vegas, NM 2 of 5Los Alamos Wellness & RehabilitationLos Alamos, NM 2 of 5McGregor Wellness & RehabilitationMc Gregor, TX 2 of 5Monarch Springs Wellness & RehabilitationUniversity City, MO 2 of 5Northrise Wellness & RehabilitationLas Cruces, NM 2 of 5Prescott Valley Nursing & RehabilitationPrescott Valley, AZ 2 of 5Prescott Village Nursing & RehabilitationPrescott, AZ 2 of 5Rehabilitation Center Of Independence, TheIndependence, MO 2 of 5San Antonio Wellness & RehabilitationSan Antonio, TX 2 of 5Skyline Nursing CenterDallas, TX 2 of 5Sunny Springs Nursing & RehabSulphur Springs, TX 2 of 5White Acres Wellness & RehabilitationEl Paso, TX

Showing 40 of 65; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
CASA HEALTHCARE, LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/01/2023
CALIBER ADVISORS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 03/01/2023
GARETZ, DAVIDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/28/2023
GURWITZ, SOLOMONIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/15/2025
HAGINS, ELIZABETHIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/15/2025
KAPLAN, ESTHERIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/15/2025
KAPLAN, MOSHAIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/15/2025
MINDLE, ADAMIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/15/2025
STERNSHEIN, JENNIFERIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2025
UNGER, JEFFREYIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/15/2025
ZIMMERMAN, CAROLINEIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2025
205 MOONGLOW AVE NM, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2023
CONTINUUM REHAB GROUP LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2023
GIBRALTAR TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2023
HALLMARK ADVISORS, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2023
HANSEN HUNTER LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2024
OPCO CA SKILLED MGMT INC.OrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2023
OPCO NM SKILLED MGMT, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2023
REGIS TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2023
THE WRIGHT GROUP CONSULTING, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2024
WILSHIRE HEALTH REALTY, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2023
KIGHT, LEAHIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 06/03/2024
STOLARCZYK, LISAIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 23 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

12 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$13.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-7.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$3.8M
Related-party expense27% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 82%Medicare 7%Other / private 11%

About 82% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $3.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 27% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$401per resident / day
operating cost
$12,181per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$372per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NM

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New Mexico Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in New Mexico
$9,125/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,633/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,950/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 325043. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next