No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Los Alamos Wellness & Rehabilitation

1011 Sombrillo Court, Los Alamos, NM 87544 · For profit - Corporation · 64 certified beds · (505) 662-4300 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseBehavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0740)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$91,403 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602, F0603) — most recent Mar 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (60) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $91,403 in federal fines (most recent 2025-12-19)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1460 Trinity Dr · (505) 412-6033 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
751 Trinity Dr · (505) 661-2770 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
751 Trinity Dr · (505) 661-2757 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased3.9%11.3%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.3%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.9%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.6%0.9%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.7%2.0%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury7.3%3.5%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened5.6%11.7%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication3.9%14.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.7%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.5%5.2%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control16.6%20.0%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table6.7%14.5%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.1%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine99.1%86.4%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission20.6%22.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit11.8%15.7%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.281.651.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.802.811.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 101 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

53.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
88.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.29U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.19hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 88.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 71 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 46% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF53.8%CMS range 44.0–61.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.6%CMS range 7.3–16.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge88.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge85.9%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge84.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge93.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay2.9%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened5.8%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.8%CMS range 5.0–12.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.821.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.69
RN hours/ resident / day
0.34
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.06
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.09
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.54
RN hoursweekends
54.2%
Total nursing turnover
81.8%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 64 beds and averages 59.5 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.09 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.69 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.06 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.91 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.16 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.75 to 0.54 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-30)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2024-12-09)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

60 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 49 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · K2025-12-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received the necessary treatment and services to prevent the development and worsening of pressure wounds ( damage which results from unrelieved pressure on the body) for 2 (R #s 2 and 4) of 4 (R #s 1, 2, 3 and 4) residents reviewed for wounds when staff failed to: Follow Physician treatment orders for R #2 and 4.Document and monitor wound progress (that includes measurements; to track effectiveness of wound care treatments and to prevent the progression of pressure ulcers) for R #2. These deficient practices likely resulted in the worsening of R #2's and R #4's pressure wounds. The findings are: R #2: A. Record review of R #2's admission assessment revealed R #2 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] from the local hospital with stage 2 (some of the outer surface of the skin is damaged) pressure ulcer to his coccyx (tailbone) measuring 2.3x4.2 centimeters. B. Record review of R #2's face sheet medical diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-30 · tag F0577 — pattern
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the results of the most recent state surveys were posted in areas of the facility that was readily accessible to residents and the public without having to ask for them. This could affect all 57 residents in the facility (residents were identified by the census report provided by the Administrator on 03/23/26). If residents, representatives, and/or visitors are unable to locate the most recent survey information, then they are unable to make informed decisions regarding residents' care. The findings are: A. On 03/25/26 at 2:00 PM, during an observation of the front lobby, revealed a survey results binder was located behind the receptionist desk in the front lobby area. The survey results binder was not readily accessible and visible for residents, family, or visitors. The survey results binder was in the middle of other binders. The survey results binder did not have any spine information on it to distinguish the binder from several other binders in the same area. B. On 03/25/26 at 1:54 PM, during an interview the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-30 · tag F0628 — pattern
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide the required transfer information for 3 (R #8, R #26, and R #43) of 4 (R #8, R #26, R #43, and R #59) residents reviewed for hospitalizations when staff failed to: 1. Notify R #8, R #26, R #43, and their representative(s) of the residents' transfer to the hospital in writing and in a language and manner they understand. 2. Ensure the transfer notices for R #8, R #26, and R #43 included: a. A statement of the resident's appeal rights, including the name, address (mailing and email), and telephone number of the entity which receives such requests; and information on how to obtain an appeal form and assistance in completing the form and submitting the appeal hearing request. b. The name, phone number, and address (mailing and email) of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman (an advocate for residents in nursing homes and assisted living facilities).3. Send a written copy of R #8, R #26, and R #43 transfer notices to the Ombudsman. 4.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure care plan revisions occurred for 4 (R #3, R #5, R #9, and R #14) of 10 (R #1, R #3, R #4, R #5, R #6, R #9, R #10, R #14, R #54, and R #64) residents reviewed for care plan accuracy, when staff failed to revise the care plan with the most current resident information. This deficient practice could likely result in the care plan not being updated with the most current resident conditions and appropriate interventions, staff being unaware of changes in care provided, and residents not receiving the care related to changes in their health status or healthcare decisions. The findings are: R #3 A. Record review of R #3's admission Record, no date, revealed the following: 1. R #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. 2. R #3 had the following diagnoses: a. Alzheimer's Disease (a progressive, irreversible brain disorder that causes cognitive decline, memory loss, and behavior changes). b. Unsteadiness on feet (a lack of balance, stability, or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with respect and dignity for 1 (R #54) of 2 (R #54, and R #64) residents sampled for dignity, when the facility failed to wake R #54 while asleep in the dining room and/or ask if R #54 wanted to join the activity that was taking place in the dining room. This deficient practice is likely to result in residents feeling unimportant, embarrassed, undervalued, and could diminish their self-worth. The findings are: A. Record Review of R #54's admission Record, no date, revealed resident was admitted on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #54's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 12. C. On 03/24/26 at 2:32 PM - 2:54 PM, during an observation of the tea social activity in the resident dining room revealed the following: 1. R #54 was asleep in the center of the dining room surrounded by other residents. 2. There were four staff present (activity director, activity assistant, dietary aide, and a volunteer).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to keep residents free from neglect for 2 (R #8 and R #43) of 4 (R #8, R #26, R #43 and R #59) residents reviewed for hospitalization, when they failed to provide transportation from the hospital to the facility after being discharged from the emergency room (ER). If residents are left at the hospital after discharge, then they could likely feel confused, angry, fearful, and anxious. The findings are:R #8 A. Record review of the Intake Report (consumer complaint from the public to the state agency), dated 02/20/26, revealed residents that were transported to the ER at the local hospital were being left there for extended periods of time after being discharged . B. Record review of R #8's admission record, no date, revealed the following: 1. An admission date of 10/13/25. 2. R #8 had the following diagnoses: a. Alzheimer's disease (progressive, incurable neurodegenerative disease and the most common cause of dementia, causing severe memory, thinking, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-30 · tag F0603 — failed to not confine residents against their will — isolated
    Protect each resident from separation (from other residents, his/her room, or confinement to his/her room).
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to keep residents free from involuntary seclusion (separation of a resident or patient from others, or from their room, against their will or the will of their legal representative) for 1 (R #7) of 1 (R #7) residents reviewed for physical restraints, when they failed to implement and document the following:1. The clinical criteria (rules or standards on which a decision or judgment is made to determine medical necessity) R #7 met for placement in the secured/locked area by the resident's physician along with information provided by members of the interdisciplinary team. 2. Whether placement in the secured/locked area was the least restrictive approach that was reasonable to protect R #7 and assure her health and safety. 3. The IDT consideration of the impact and/or reaction of R #7, if any, regarding placement on the unit.4. Ongoing review and revision of R #7's care plan as necessary, including whether she continues to meet the criteria for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-30 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide an ongoing program of activities designed to meet the interests of the residents for 2 (R #8 and R #43) of 3 (R #8, R #43, and R #54) residents reviewed for activities, when staff failed to provide meaningful activities based upon residents' interests. If residents are not provided or encouraged to attend/participate in activities that meet their interests, they are likely to experience an increase in boredom, isolation, and depression. The findings are:R #8A. On 03/24/26 at 10:17 AM, during an interview, R #8's Family Member stated he never sees residents doing any activities in the Secure Unit. B. On 03/24/26 at 3:08 PM, during an observation of the secured unit, there is an activity calendar posted in the commons area on the wall by the television. It was observed that the activity calendars are hanging in the resident's rooms also. C. On 03/24/26 at 2:18 PM, during an interview, CNA #8 stated activities are not scheduled in the Secured Unit. CNA #8 stated that the activities calendar posted was for the Main Unit.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide quality of care for 1 (R #3) of 1 (R #3) residents reviewed for hospice services when staff failed to: 1. Ensure care coordination occurred between hospice staff and facility staff.2. Ensure R #3's visit notes from hospice were in her medical record. 3. Ensure R #3's orders from the hospice provider were in her medical record. These deficient practices are likely to result in staff not being aware of residents' care needs, staff not providing ordered medications, and worsening of the residents' medical conditions. The findings are:A. Record review of R #3's admission Record, no date, revealed R #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. B. On 03/24/26 at 2:06 PM, during an interview, R #3's Family Member (FM) stated the following:1. R #3 had fallen on 03/17/26.2. The hospice provider had ordered R #3 scheduled pain medication for hip pain.3. R #3 was diagnosed with pneumonia (a serious lung infection caused by bacteria, viruses, or fungi) and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide respiratory care in accordance with professional standards for 1 (R #3) of 3 (R #2, R #3, and R #14) residents reviewed for respiratory care when the staff failed to:1. Order medications for the correct dose and the correct length of time for R #3's respiratory infection. 2. Assess vital signs and respiratory status after R #3 was diagnosed with an upper respiratory infection.These deficient practices are likely to result in staff not being aware of residents' respiratory status and worsening of their condition. The findings are: A. Record review of R #3's admission Record, no date, revealed R #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. B. On 03/24/26 at 2:06 PM, during an interview, R #3's Family Member (FM) stated that R #3 was diagnosed with pneumonia (a serious lung infection caused by bacteria, viruses, or fungi) and was started on antibiotics (powerful medications that treat bacterial infections by killing bacteria or preventing them from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-30 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to effectively manage pain (use of different techniques and medication to reduce and control the amount of pain a person experiences) for 1 (R #63) of 1 (R #63) residents reviewed for pain, when the facility failed to:Administer scheduled pain medications.Offer PRN pain medication. This deficient practice could likely result in residents experiencing unnecessary pain causing residents to experience a decline in physical and emotional health. The findings are:A. Record review of R #63's admission Record (no date) revealed the following:1. R #63 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. 2. R #63 diagnoses included: a. Post-polio syndrome (condition that affects some individuals who have previously had polio, leading to muscle weakness, fatigue, joint pain and other symptoms many years after the initial infection). b. Polyneuropathy (condition in which multiple peripheral nerves throughout the body are damaged disrupting communication between the brain and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 49 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medical records were complete and accurate for 2 (R #3 and R #7) of 2 (R #3 and R #7) residents reviewed for accuracy of documentation, when staff failed to: 1. Ensure R #3's medications were ordered for the correct diagnoses or symptom. 2. Clarify what type of respiratory illness R #3 was being treated for. 3. Ensure that R #7's care plan documented accurate diagnosis.These deficient practices have the potential to negatively impact the care staff provide to meet residents' needs due to inaccurate records. The findings are: R #3 A. Record review of R #3's admission Record, no date, revealed the following: 1. R #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. 2. R #3's diagnoses did not include a respiratory illness. B. On 03/24/26 at 2:06 PM, during an interview, R #3's Family Member (FM) stated that R #3 was diagnosed with pneumonia (a serious lung infection caused by bacteria, viruses, or fungi) and was started on antibiotics (powerful medications…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-19 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — pattern
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to notify the provider timely of any skin condition changes for 1 (R #1) of 1 (R #1) resident reviewed when the facility's treatment nurse (TN) did not notify the provider of the worsening wound and lack of healing progress. This deficient practice is likely to result in a delay in treatment or inadequate treatment. The findings are: A. Record review of R #1's face sheet revealed R #1 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] and discharged to the emergency room [DATE]. B. Record review of R #1's medical diagnoses on face sheet dated 10/14/25 revealed the following (including but not limited to): -Muscle wasting and atrophy (waste away), not elsewhere classified, multiple sites. -Morbid (SEVERE) obesity (substantial accumulation of body fat) due to excess calories. -Developmental disorder of scholastic skills (a persons ability to learn core academic skills).-Disorder of adrenal (endocrine gland located on top of each kidney) gland.-Hypopituitary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure the wound was monitored weekly and order to refer to wound clinic was followed for 1(R #1) of 4(R #1-4) residents reviewed for wounds. This deficient practice likely resulted in the worsening of the wound. The findings are:Cross reference to findings in F580 A. Record review of R #1's wound report dated 06/07/25 through 09/01/25 revealed the following: - 06/07/25 - 06/14/25 = Date Identified 06/10/25 left lower leg front, Length (L) = N/A, Width (W) = N/A, Depth (D) = N/A). - 06/15/25 - 06/22/25 = (No weekly skin assessment documentation found) - 07/01/25 - 07/02/25 = (No weekly skin assessment documentation found) - 07/19/25 - 07/20/25 = (No weekly skin assessment documentation found) - 07/21/25 - 08/02/25 = Last assessed: 08/02/25 = Skin Tear left lower leg front, L=4.00 cm, W=4.50 cm, D=0.10 cm - 08/03/25 - 08/11/25 = (No weekly skin assessment documentation found) - 08/12/25 - 08/25/25 = Last assessed: 08/14/25 = Skin Tear left lower leg front, L=3.70 cm, W=5.00 cm, D=0.10 cm B. Record review of R #1's physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to: ensure medications were stored properly, medication carts were locked and secured when not in use. This deficient practice is likely to result in resident injury, through dosing with medications that have been improperly stored, having access to medications not prescribed for them, and possible overdose. A. On 11/18/25 at 2:00 pm, during random observation of the memory care unit and interview the medication cart was unlocked. Medication cart was in the back of the unit and standing next to the medication cart was R #5 and walking back and forth was R #6. Medication cart was unlocked from 2:00 pm to 2:33. Housekeeping Director was asked medication cart should be left unlocked and he stated No and proceeded to go look for Director of Nursing (DON) #2, and left cart unlocked. Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1 was asked if medication cart should be unlocked, she stated it should not be she also walked away to look for the Nurse. CNA #1 came back a few minutes later and locked the medication cart. B. On 11/18/25 at 2:32 pm, during…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure medical records were accurate for 2(R #2 and 4) of 4(R #104) residents reviewed. If the facility is not ensuring accurate medical records, then residents are likely at risk of not receiving the care needed to achieve optimal wellness. The findings are:R #2:A. Record review of R #2's admission assessment revealed R #2 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] from the local hospital with stage 2 (some of the outer surface of the skin is damaged) pressure ulcer to his coccyx (tailbone) measuring 2.3x4.2 centimeters. B. Record review of R #2's weekly wound report (tracking system the facility utilizes to tract and trend all residents skin concerns) dated 09/03/25 through 10/15/25 revealed the following: - 09/03/25 - 09/10/25 = Date last assessed 09/05/25 Coccyx, Deep Tissue Pressure Injury, Length (L) = 6.00, Width (W) = 6.60, Depth (D) = 0.00, Deep Maroon=75%, Bright Beefy Red=25%. - 09/11/25 - 09/17/25 = No weekly skin assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store and serve food under sanitary conditions when staff failed to ensure: 1. All items were labeled and dated in the locked unit and room [ROOM NUMBER] refrigerators. 2. Daily temperatures of the locked unit and room [ROOM NUMBER] refrigerators were documented. These deficient practices are likely to affect all 20 residents in the locked unit, 2 residents in room [ROOM NUMBER] and is likely to cause foodborne illnesses in residents. The findings are: A. On 06/16/25 at 9:33 AM, during the initial walk through of the facility's locked unit, a refrigerator in the dining area and room [ROOM NUMBER]. The refrigerator contained the following food items and snacks for the residents. 1. Two containers of punch/juice, two containers of nutritional supplements, one container of salsa, all items were unlabeled and undated. 2. One uncovered container of punch/juice, dated 06/11/25, was expired and improperly stored. 3. Packaged frozen food items in the freezer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store and serve food under sanitary conditions when staff failed to ensure: 1. All items were labeled and dated in the locked unit refrigerator. 2. Daily temperatures of the locked unit refrigerator were documented. These deficient practices are likely to affect all 20 residents in the locked unit and could lead to foodborne illnesses in residents. The findings are: A. On 03/18/25 at 10:33 AM, during the initial walk through of the facility's locked unit, a refrigerator was in the dining area. The refrigerator contained food items and snacks for the residents. The refrigerator contained the following: 1. Two containers of punch/juice, one package of cheese, one head of lettuce, one package of turkey sandwich meat, one container of salsa, a partial loaf of bread, all items were unlabeled and undated. 2. One uncovered container of punch/juice dated 03/11/25. 3. Packaged frozen food items in the freezer that were unlabeled and undated. 4. Refrigerator temperature log was not available for review. B. On 03/18/25 at 10:44 AM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-24 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to safeguard clinical record information by leaving Private Health Information (PHI) where unauthorized persons had access to the PHI for 1 (R #4) of 1 (R #4) resident reviewed during random observation. If resident's clinical information is not safe guarded, resident's PHI is likely to be viewed by unauthorized residents, visitors and staff. The findings are: A. On 03/19/25 at 5:40 PM during a random observation, the Admissions Coordinator (AC) left a clipboard with R #4's PHI face up and unattended in the facility lobby, visible to unauthorized residents, visitors and staff. B. On 03/19/25 at 5:42 PM, during an interview, the Human Resources Director (HR) confirmed the clipboard with R #4's PHI was left faced up and unattended in the facility lobby and PHI should not have been visible.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-24 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to keep residents free from abuse for 1 (R #1) of 3 (R #1, R #2, and R #3) residents reviewed for abuse when the facility failed to protect a resident. This deficient practice is likely to result in residents continuing to be at risk for abuse. The findings are: A. Record review of a complaint report for R #1 revealed on 12/30/24 an alleged incident of abuse had occurred as follows: a Certified Nurse Aide and another staff had witnessed a Registered Nurse (RN) #1 yell and push R #1. The incident had been reported to the Administrator. The unidentified reporter had not witnessed an investigation, and the nurse remained in the unit and the residents in the unit were at risk for further abuse by the accused nurse (RN) #1. B. Record review of R #1's face sheet, dated 03/18/25, revealed R #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: - Personal history of Traumatic Brain Injury. - Unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide an incident report to the State Survey Agency, for 1 (R #1) of 3 (R #1, #2, and #3) residents reviewed for abuse. If the facility fails to report incidents of possible abuse to the State Agency, then the State Agency is unable to ensure residents have a safe environment. The findings are: A. Record review of a complaint report for R #1 revealed on 12/30/24 an alleged incident of abuse had occurred as follows, a Certified Nurse Aide and and another staff had witnessed Registered Nurse (RN) #1 yell and push R #1. The incident had been reported to the Administrator and the unidentified reporter had not witnessed an investigation, and the nurse remained in the unit and the residents in the unit were at risk for further abuse by the accused nurse (RN). B. Record review of the facility's incident log dated 03/08/25 revealed the log did not contain any documentation of the incident for an allegation of of abuse toward R #1. C. On 03/19/25 at 2:42 PM during interview with the Administrator (ADM), she confirmed she is the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-24 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Refer to F-600 Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of abuse. If the facility is not conducting thorough abuse investigations then residents are likely to continue to be at risk of abuse. The findings are: A. Record review of a complaint report for R #1 revealed on 12/30/24 an alleged incident of abuse had occurred as follows, a Certified Nurse Aide and another staff had witnessed a Registered Nurse (RN) #1 yell and push R #1. The incident had been reported to the Administrator. The unidentified reporter had not witnessed an investigation, and the nurse remained in the unit and the residents in the unit were at risk for further abuse by the accused nurse (RN) #1. B. On 03/19/25 at 2:42 PM during interview with the Administrator (ADM), she confirmed she is the Abuse Coordinator. ADM further stated the procedure of an abuse allegation is if a resident makes an accusation of abuse/neglect, if it is a specific allegation of abuse towards a staff member, we place that staff member on leave and start the investigation. In the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the facility was free of accident hazards for 1 (R #2) of 2 (R #1 and #2) residents reviewed for accidents and hazards when staff failed to supervise a resident that was considered a fall risk and required the use of an ambulatory assistance device (walker, wheelchair) in the locked unit. This deficient practice is likely to result in residents experiencing avoidable falls. The findings are: A. Record review of R #2's face sheet revealed R #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnosis: - Fracture of Unspecified Part of Neck of Right Femur (Femur fracture). - Closed Right Femur Fracture with Routine (normal) Healing. - Cognitive Communication Deficit (problems with communication caused by impaired cognitive processes, such as attention, memory, language, and reasoning). B. Record review of R #2's Fall Risk Evaluation dated 03/12/25 revealed the following: - Chair bound and required assist with toileting. - Resident is not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure medication carts were locked when unattended. This deficient practice is likely to negatively impact the health of residents if they were to ingest medications not intended for them. The findings are: A. On 03/18/25 at 10:25 AM during the initial walk through of the locked unit, the medication cart was unlocked and staff left the cart unattended. B. On 03/18/25 at 10:25 AM during interview with Registered Nurse (RN) #2, she confirmed the medication cart should not be left unlocked and unattended.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-12-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — widespread
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain a comfortable water temperature in the resident shower rooms for all 63 residents listed on the census provided by the Administrator (ADM) on 12/02/24. If the water temperature is too cold, then this deficient practice is likely to negatively impact resident safety and comfort. The findings are: A. Record review of the facility resident council minutes, dated 10/15/24, revealed R #30 reported the showers were too cold. The resident council minutes stated the Maintenance Director (MD) would be contacted about the water temperature. B. On 12/04/24 at 1:06 pm during an observation of the water temperatures in the Shower room [ROOM NUMBER] and an interview, the MD turned on the water and allowed it to run for several minutes. The MD used a calibrated thermometer to checked the water temperature, and it measured 94.1 degrees (°) Fahrenheit (F). The MD stated the water was cold. C. On 12/04/24 at 1:17 pm during an observation of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-12-09 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — widespread
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide residents a nourishing bedtime snack in order to ensure there was not more than 14 hours between a substantial evening meal and breakfast the following day for 8 (R #11, R #14, R #16, R #35, R#36, R #40, R#48 and R #50) of 8 (R #11, R #14, R #16, R #35, R#36, R #40, R#48 and R #50) residents reviewed for snacks. This deficient practice could likely cause frustration and lead to unnecessary hunger. The findings are: A. Record review of the facility's meal times, no date, revealed staff served dinner at 5:00 PM and breakfast at 8:00 AM (15 hours between meal services.) B. On 12/03/ 24 at 2:11 PM, during an interview with the Resident Council, residents stated they were not provided with a snack at bedtime and dinner was served at 5:00 PM. Residents stated they would like to have snacks at bedtime, because some residents got hungry. The residents stated the facility used to provide snacks at night, but snacks are not available any more. The resident stated they would like bedtime snacks again. C. On 12/ 04/24 at 2:04…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store and serve food under sanitary conditions when staff failed to ensure: 1. Food items were sealed, labeled, and dated. 2. The kitchen and food related equipment were clean and free of grease and grime. 3. The trash can was covered when not in use. 4. Maintained food at temperatures out of the danger zone [between the temperatures of 45 degrees (°) Fahrenheit (F) and 135° F; the temperature range in which food-borne bacteria can grow.] This deficient practice is likely to affect all 63 residents listed on the resident census list provided by the Administrator on 12/02/24 and is likely lead to foodborne illnesses in residents if food is not being stored properly and safe food handling practices are not adhered to. The findings are: A. On 12/02/24 at 11:07 am, observation of the kitchen revealed the following: - A trash can was uncovered and not in use. - The stove was not clean with dried food stuck on the burners and side of the stove. - The steam table water wells were visibly soiled with food particles and calcium built…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-12-09 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — widespread
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure there was a functioning call light system that allowed residents to call for assistance. This deficient practice likely affected all 63 residents identified on the resident census list provided on 12/02/24. If the facility does not have a functioning communication system, then residents are unlikely to get their immediate needs met by facility staff. The findings are: A. Record review of the Resident Council meeting minutes revealed the following: 1. On 10/15/24: The residents had concerns with the call lights taking too long to answer. Resident Council minutes indicated the call light response times issue was not resolved. 2. On 11/16/24: Call lights were still taking too long to be answered. Resident Council minutes indicated the call light response times issue was not resolved and stated, Call lights are still taking too long to be answered. B. On 12/03/24 at 12:19 pm during an call light observation, Room (RM) #211's call light was activated, but it did not sound at the nurses station or unit to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-09 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — pattern
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the resident's Power of Attorney (POA; authority to act for another person in specified or all legal or financial matters), the facility providers (Nurse Practitioner, Physician, Registered Dietitian), and the Director of Nursing (DON) when an resident experienced nausea and abdominal pain for 1 (R #12) of 1 (R #12) residents reviewed change of condition. If the facility does not notify the POA, facility providers, or DON when the resident experiences abdominal pain with nausea for multiple days, then the POA, facility providers, and DON are unable to make decisions related to treatment and advocate for the resident's care. The findings are: A. Record review of R #12's face sheet revealed R #12 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #12's nursing progress notes revealed staff documented the following: 1. On 10/22/24 at 9:16 am: R #12 notified nursing staff she was nauseous throughout the night. Staff administered 12…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff revised the care plan for 3 (R #11, #12, and #27) of 3 (R #11, #12, and #27) residents reviewed when staff failed to: 1. Conduct a quarterly care plan meeting as required for R #11. 2. Update R #12's plan of care when the resident returned from the ER with a diagnoses of gall stones (an abnormal stone-like mass in the gallbladder, which causes sudden severe pain in upper right side of the abdomen). 3. Update the care plan to include positioning a resident's bed to prevent sleeping all day for R #27. These deficient practices are likely to result in residents' care and needs not being addressed if care plans are not updated. The findings are: R #11: A. Record review of R #11's face sheet revealed R #11 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #11's nursing progress notes revealed R #11's last care plan meeting occurred on 07/09/24. C. Record review of R #11's care plan conference (meeting) assessment,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to monitor and provide appropriate interventions for 1 (R #12) of 1 (R #12) residents reviewed for illness when staff failed to send R #12 to the emergency room (ER) after several days of experiencing nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain without relief. These deficient practices likely resulted in R #12's nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain becoming worse. The findings are: A. Record review of R #12's face sheet revealed R #12 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #12's nursing progress notes revealed staff documented the following: 1. On 10/22/24 at 9:16 am: R #12 notified nursing staff she was nauseous throughout the night. Staff administered 12 milliliters (ml) of Pepto-Bismol to R #12. 2. On 10/22/24 at 12:15 pm: R #12 refused pain medication, because she was still nauseous. 3. On 10/22/24 at 12:44 pm: R #12 reported the Pepto-Bismol helped some, but she was still nauseous. Staff gave Zofran (anti-nausea medication) to R…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-09 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure physicians reviewed and responded to recommendations submitted by the pharmacist's written monthly review for 5 (R #3, 16, 33, 34, 38) of 5 (R #3, 16, 33, 34, 38) residents. This deficient practice is likely to cause resident medication regimen to not be properly evaluated resulting in possible over medication. The findings are: R #03 A. Record review of pharmacist recommendations for R #3 revealed the following: - On 05/24/24, consider fall risks related to medications prescribed: Resident had recent fall. Gabapentin (medication administered to reduce pain) and quetiapine (medication administered to treat several psychiatric disorders) increase risk of falls. Consider medication changes. The recommendation was not signed, and there was not any evidence it was reviewed and considered by the physician. - On 08/26/24, consider fall risks related to medications prescribed: resident had recent fall. Gabapentin , melatonin (medication administered to induce sleep), venlafaxine (medication to manage depression) and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to dispose of a controlled substance (a medication that is at high risk for abuse) that was discontinued for 1 (R #38) of 1 (R #38) resident reviewed for medication storage. Failure to properly dispose of a discontinued controlled substance can result is mishandling or theft of medications. The findings are: A. Record review of R #38's provider orders revealed the following prescriptions for Ativan: - Dated 10/02/23, lorazepam (generic name for Ativan) oral tablet, 0.5 mg. Give one tablet by mouth every four hours as needed. Discontinued on 01/13/24. - Dated 10/21/24, lorazepam, 0.5 mg oral tablet to be taken every six hours as needed for anxiety. Discontinued on 11/06/24. - The record did not contain a current order for Ativan. B. On 12/03/24 at 4:03 pm during observation of the medication cart located in the Dementia Unit (a unit that serves residents who are experiencing loss of memory and mental decline), three bubble pack cards (a large card containing multiple plastic bubbles, each bubble contains a single…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-09 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident's current advance directive (a document which provides an individual's wishes for emergency and life saving care) and the resident's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed the same resident wishes for 1 (R #11) of 1 (R #11) residents reviewed for advance directives. This deficient practice is likely to cause confusion and delay potentially life saving procedures. The findings are: A. Record review of the face sheet in R #11's EHR revealed R #11 was admitted into the facility on [DATE], and her current advanced directive was listed as do not attempt resuscitation (DNR; lifesaving measures are not desired.) B. Record review of R #11's Medical Orders For Scope of Treatment (MOST; a legal document which outlines the care the resident wants when they become incapacitated and unable to speak for themselves) forms revealed the following: - Dated [DATE], R #11's advanced directive was DNR. - Dated [DATE], R #11's advanced directive was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-09 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received necessary behavioral health care to meet their needs for 1 (R #49) of 1 (R #49) residents when staff failed to ensure effective communication between the facility and psychiatric providers and to provide consistent psychiatric services to meet R #49's psychiatric needs. These deficient practices are likely to result in the residents not receiving the behavioral or mental health care and assistance needed to improve mood and reduce depression and anxiety. The findings are: A. Record review of R #49's face sheet revealed R #49 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: - Dementia, severe with agitation. - Depression. - Dementia with behavioral disturbance. B. Record review of R #49's physician order, dated 10/23/24, revealed R #49 was to be referred to a psychiatric provider to evaluate and treat. C. Record review of R #49's Psychiatric Consent for Services form, dated 10/23/24, revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medical records were updated with necessary documents and accurate for 1 (R #11) of 1 (R #11) residents reviewed, when the facility failed to complete an accurate smoking assessment for R #11. This deficient practice is likely to result in residents not receiving accurate assessments and having an inaccurate medical record, which could result in the residents receiving less than optimal care and treatment. The findings are: A. Record review of R #11's face sheet revealed R #11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #11's smoking assessment revealed the following: - Dated 07/08/24, the resident was a safe smoker with minimal supervision. - Dated 10/02/24, the resident did not smoke. C. Record review of R #11's care plan, last reviewed on 12/04/24, revealed R #11 was assessed as a safe smoker and could smoke independently. D. On 12/04/24 at 10:41 am during an interview with R #11, she stated she was a smoker and could smoked…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 (R #1) of 3 (R #1, #2 and #3) resident reviewed for medication administration when staff did not obtain and provide prescribed medications. This deficient practice is likely to result in residents experiencing pain, discomfort, and less than optimal care. The findings are: A. Record review of R #1's face sheet revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including: - Low back pain. - Chronic pain syndrome. - Intervertebral (the space between each bone of the back) disc (the soft liquid filled sac between each bone of the back) degeneration (gradual deterioration). - The resident discharged from the facility on 05/07/24. B. Record review of R #1's provider orders revealed an order, dated 05/01/24, for Pregabalin capsule 50 mg. Give 50 mg by mouth three times a day for pain-no end date noted C. Record review of R #1's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-22 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were bathed according to their preference for 1 (R #3) of 1 (R #3) resident reviewed for showers. This deficient practice is likely to result in the residents' personal choices not being honored, poor hygiene, and loss of dignity. The findings are: A. On 07/19/24 at 1:54 PM during an interview with R #3's daughter, she stated her mother rarely got showers and her hair was always greasy at the facility. She further stated her mother was able to make choices about her care and voiced that she did not refuse showers when they were offered to her. The daughter also stated her mother was very private and embarrassed about asking for care. B. Record review of shower schedule revealed R #3's shower days were Wednesdays and Saturdays. C. Record review of shower sheets and documentation survey reports (a detailed report that included tasks, interventions, frequency, documentation details, and responses), dated 3/20/24 through 04/17/24, revealed R #3 had one shower on 03/23/24 out of nine opportunities. D. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-22 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff monitored residents for side effects of medication for 1 (R #3) of 1 (R #3) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. If the facility is not adequately monitoring for the side effects of the medications prescribed to their residents then residents are likely to be at risk of adverse outcomes. The findings are: A. On 07/19/24 at 1:54 PM during an interview with R #3's daughter, she stated her mother had unresolved diarrhea. B. Record review of R #3's medical record revealed R #3 was admitted on [DATE] for skilled services with the primary diagnosis of metabolic encephalopathy (a disorder that affects the brain and causes altered mental status). Further review revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS; a tool used to measure a person's ability to think, problem-solve, and process information) score of 7, severe impairment. C. Record Review of R #3's care plan, dated 03/26/24, revealed R #3 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to meet professional standards of quality for 1 (R #1) of 1 (R #1) residents when staff failed to implement a resident's care plan for fall precautions. If fall prevention measures are not implemented then residents are likely to sustain falls that can result in serious harm or injury and the resident's decline in health and quality of life. The findings are: A. Record review of R #1's face sheet revealed resident was admitted to facility on 04/07/23 with the following diagnoses which made the resident a high fall risk: 1. Senile degeneration of brain, not elsewhere classified. 2. Muscle weakness (a decrease of strength in muscles.) 3. Muscle wasting and atrophy (the wasting or thinning of muscle mass.) 4. Type II diabetes mellitus (a condition results from insufficient production of insulin, causing high blood sugar.) 5. Hypertension (high blood pressure.) 6. Respiratory failure, hypoxia (a condition in which a person's lungs have difficulty exchanging oxygen and carbon dioxide with the blood). B. Record review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide activities of daily living (ADL) assistance with bathing and showers for 1 (R #1) of 1 (R #1) resident reviewed for ADL care. This deficient practice is likely to affect the dignity and health of the resident. The findings are: A. On 03/18/24 at 11:50 am during observation, R #1 lay in bed asleep. Her brief was soiled, her hair was disheveled, and her fingernails were long with heavy debris under her nails. B. Record review of the shower schedule revealed R #1's showers were scheduled for Saturday and Wednesday. C. On 03/18/24 at 11:58 am during an interview with LPN #1, she stated R #1's fingernails were dirty with debris under the nails. D. Record review of the [NAME] Hall shower book on 03/18/24 at 12:13 pm revealed the book did not contain documentation to show R #1 had a shower since 03/13/24. E. On 03/18/24 at 12:40 pm during interview LPN #1 stated the last documented shower for R #1 was dated Wednesday 03/13/24.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility staff failed to follow proper infection prevention protocols when they did not ensure staff utilized personal protective equipment (PPE; i.e., gown and gloves) when they entered the room of a resident (R #1) confirmed positive for COVID 19 (infectious disease). Failure to adhere to an infection control program is likely to cause infections and illness to all residents and staff within the facility. The findings are: A. On 03/14/24 at 1:48 pm during an observation, R #1 lay in bed in their room. In the hallway beside R #1's doorway was a container with PPE (indicating that PPE must be put on before entering the room). Further observation at 1:50 pm revealed the Administrator and the Regional Administrative Officer ([NAME]) entered the resident's room without donning (put on) PPE. B. On 03/14/24 at 1:52 pm during an interview with RN #1, she stated any staff who entered R #1's room should put on PPE. She stated R #1 was COVID 19 positive. RN #1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-10-26 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the nutritional needs and preferences were met for all 57 residents listed on the facility census provided by the Administrator on 10/23/23 by: 1. Not making an alternative meal available to residents. 2. Not providing resident's with an alternate meal menu. If the facility is not providing an alternative meal or offering an alternate meal menu to residents, then residents are likely to experience weight loss, frustration, and depression. The findings are: Alternative Meal Findings: A. Record review of the facility's week at a glance Spring/Summer and Fall/Winter 2023/24 menu revealed the facility provided one meal for each breakfast, lunch, and supper. The facility did not offer an alternative meal/choice with each meal. B. On 10/23/23 at 3:43 pm during an interview with R #23, he stated, It [facility food] was good for awhile, and then it got bad. The new company cut the budget on the kitchen. We [resident's] used to have two menus, and now we only have one. It's a shame, because resident's have to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to store and serve food under sanitary conditions by not ensuring: 1. Food items stored in the kitchen refrigerators/freezers were labeled, dated, stored appropriately, and not expired. 2. The kitchen and freezer floors were free from debris (large pieces of ice in the freezer) and trash. 3. Food was left open above the food prep stations in the kitchen with multiple flying insects near it. 4. Food temperature records were completed for each meal prior to serving. This deficient practice is likely to affect all 57 residents listed on the resident census list provided on 10/23/23 and could likely lead to forborne illnesses in residents if food is not being stored properly and safe food handling practices are not adhered to. The findings are: Kitchen Refrigerator, Freezer, Dry Storage, Floor, and Prep Station Findings: A. On 10/23/23 at 9:19 am during the initial tour of facility kitchen, the following was observed in the kitchen freezers, kitchen refrigerators, kitchen dry storage, kitchen floors, and kitchen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to adequately establish, maintain, and implement an infection prevention and control program for all residents by failing to provide proof of monitoring water system for Legionella (bacteria in water) and other opportunistic waterborne pathogens. This deficient practice could likely affect all 57 residents in the facility as identified on the census list provided by the Administrator on 10/23/23. Failure to plan and implement an infection control program could likely cause the spread of infections and illness to residents and staff within the facility. The findings are: A. Record review on 10/26/23 of the facility's Infection Control Program revealed staff could not locate the water management plan which addressed monitoring for Legionella and other waterborne pathogens. B. On 10/26/23 at 4:12 pm during an interview with Maintenance Director (MD), he stated the county tests the water every six months and the sewer. He did not know if they checked for Legionella. He further added he never checked for Legionella…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-26 · tag F0577 — pattern
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to have the most recent survey results in a place that was readily accessible for all 57 residents that reside in the facility (such as a lobby or other area frequented by most residents, visitors, or other individuals where individuals wishing to examine survey results do not have to ask to see them). If residents are unable to locate the latest survey results conducted by State Surveyors then residents, representatives, and visitors are unable to know how the facility is doing and make decisions accordingly. The findings are: A. On 10/25/23 at 12:37 PM, during a resident council meeting, R #8, R #10, R #23, R #61, R #63 and R #64 said they did not know where to find the latest survey results conducted by State Surveyors. B. On 10/25/23 and 10/26/23 during random observation of the front reception area and sign-in table, the survey results binder nor signage (indicating location of survey results binder) were visible. C. On 10/26/23 at 1:06 PM during interview with Social Services Director (SSD), she stated the results from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-26 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to: 1. Ensure the resident's advance directive (a document which provides an individual's wishes for emergency and life saving care) and the Physicians orders revealed the same resident wishes. 2. Ensure current advance directives were included in the residents medical record. 3. Ensure advance directives were complete. for 5 (R #1, #8, #16, #32 and #62) of 5 (R #1, #8, #16, #32 and #62) residents reviewed for advance directives. These deficient practices are likely to cause residents to receive unwanted or unplanned treatment during a medical emergency. The findings are: Resident #1 A. Record review of R #1's medical record revealed her advance directive status to be full code (all life saving measures during a medical emergency) according to her New Mexico Medical Orders for Scope of Treatment form (MOST; an advanced directive). B. Record review of R #1's physicians orders, dated [DATE], revealed Do Not Resuscitate (DNR; revive from unconsciousness or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide ADL (Activities of Daily Living) assistance for baths/showers and nail care for 2 (R #'s 15 and 19) of 2 (R #'s 15 and 19) residents reviewed for ADL care by not: 1. Offering R #15 at least two showers a week. 2. Providing nail care for R #19. This deficient practice is likely to affect the dignity and health of the residents. The findings are: Findings for R #15: A. Record review of R #15's face sheet revealed R #15 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #15's care plan, dated 09/11/23, revealed, Category: ADLs Functional Status/Rehabilitation Potential- [Name of R #15] CNA [Certified Nursing Assistant] needs are as follows: Approach- BATHING ABILITY: Set up assist, and Walking Ability: Not safe to ambulate/ only with therapy on short distances. C. Record review of R #15's Point of Care History (Electronic Health Record ADL Care Tracking Form), dated 09/01/23 through 09/30/23, revealed staff offered R #15…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-26 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — pattern
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to provide a therapeutic diet as ordered by a physician for 2 (R #'s 19 and 33) of 2 (R #'s 19 and 33) residents reviewed during random dining observations. If the facility fails to provide a diet as ordered, then residents are likely to experience weight loss due to not receiving their prescribed nutritional caloric intake. The findings are: Findings for R #19: A. Record review of R #19's face sheet revealed R #19 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review R #19's care plan, dated 09/12/23, revealed, Category: Nutritional Status [Name of R #19] current dietary order is: Regular Diet/Puree texture. Nectar thickened liquids. He has supplement(s) Including shakes with his lunch and dinner meals. He is at risk for aspiration, encouraged to slow down while eating. C. Record review of R #19's physician orders, dated 10/03/23, revealed, Regular diet. Puree texture. Moderately thick consistency. D. Record review of R #19's lunch meal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medical records were complete and accurate for 2 (R #'s 8 and 33) of 2 (R#'s 8 and 33) residents by not: 1. Documenting communication with a provider for new symptoms of pain experienced for R #8. 2. Ensuring all orders were transferred over from the previously used charting system to the new charting system for R #33. This deficient practice is likely to result in staff not having the information they need to provide competent, comprehensive care and services to residents. The findings are: Findings for R #8: A. Record review of R #8's face sheet revealed R #8 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #8's nursing progress notes, dated 10/11/23, revealed, PT [Physical Therapy] reported resident [R #8] reporting shooting pain that radiates down medial (middle) thigh. Reports pain to lower back. Will notify provider. The record did not contain any other documentation that indicated the provider was made aware of R #8's pain.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's belongs was safeguarded from loss for 1 (R #9) of 1 (R #9) resident reviewed for personal property when they failed to offer R #9 a safe place for her belongings until after theft occurred. This deficient practice is likely to result in unaccounted property for the resident and family resulting in frustration. The findings are: A. Record review of R #9's face sheet revealed R #9 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #9's nursing progress notes, dated 08/29/23, revealed, SSD [Social Services Director] walked into [Name of R #9's] room, and she was crying and talking on the phone with her [name of credit card] company. She [R #9] was in the process of canceling it and having them send her a replacement card, because someone had stolen two of her cards out of her wallet. She [R #9] stated once she was off the phone that someone is trying to make charges on her cards. We [facility] called the police together and they came and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to report and provide follow-up report within 5 working days from the date of the incident (burn on head) to the State Survey Agency, for 1 (R #22) of 1 (R #22) residents reviewed for incidents. If the facility fails to provide a 5 day follow-up report to the State Agency then the State Agency will be unable to assure residents are safe and have a hazard free environment. A. Record review of R #22's face sheet revealed R #22 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #22's nursing progress notes, dated 10/19/23, revealed, Family has requested that resident's [R #22] hair not be curled anymore as there is a burn on her forehead from curling iron yesterday. C. Record review of facility incident reports, dated 10/19/23-10/26/23, revealed staff did not document an incident report for R #22's 10/19/23 incident. D. On 10/24/23 at 5:32 pm during an interview with R #22's son, he stated, The other day [10/19/23] they [facility staff] curled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff revised the care plan for 1 (R #22) of 1 (R #22) residents reviewed by not updating the care plan to include various fall prevention interventions. This deficient practices is likely to result in residents care and needs not being addressed if care plans are not updated. The findings are: A. Record review of R #22's face sheet revealed R #22 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. B. On 10/25/23 and 10/26/23, observations of the locked unit revealed: 1. 10/25/23 at 9:51 am, R #22 sat in a wheelchair in the TV area of the locked unit with other residents. 2. 10/25/23 at 12:09 pm, R #22 sat in a wheelchair in the locked unit dining room and ate lunch. 3. 10/25/23 at 2:32 pm, R #22 sat in a wheelchair in the locked unit activity room next to the unit nurse. 4. 10/26/23 at 10:11 am, R #22 sat in a wheel chair and slept. C. Record review of R #22's care plan, dated 10/24/23, revealed, Focus: Resident is at risk for falls due to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that services provided to residents met professional standards for 1 (R #33) resident out of 1 (R #33) residents reviewed for therapeutic diets. If the facility is not following physician orders residents are likely to not get the intended therapeutic results. The findings are: A. Record review of R #33 face sheet revealed resident was admitted to facility on 07/28/21. B. Record review of R #33's medical record revealed there was not a order for R #33 to receive a health shake C. Observation on 10/22/23 at 1:00 PM revealed, a health shake sat on the the bedside table in R #33's room D. On 10/25/23 at 3:50 PM during an interview with CNA #2, she stated she provided R #33 with a health shake every day she worked with her. E. On 10/25/23 at 4:12 PM during an interview with Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), she stated if a resident received a health shake it needed to be listed under their physician orders.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 (R #13) of 1 (R #13) residents reviewed for edema (swelling caused by too much fluid trapped in the body's tissues). This deficient practice is likely to result in residents experiencing pain or a worsened condition. The findings are: A. Record review of progress note, dated 08/12/23, by Medical Doctor (MD) #1, revealed a physical exam, and in the cardiovascular section noted lymphedema (a condition that results in swelling of the leg or arm) of lower legs, non-pitting (no dimples), taught skin with sock indentation. B. Record review of progress note, dated 08/17/23, by Nurse Practitioner #1 revealed under physical exam, in the cardiovascular section, both noted lymphedema of lower legs, non-pitting, taught skin with sock indentation. C. On 10/23/23 at 4:30 PM during observation and interview, R #13 had edema to her right lower leg and foot. R #13 stated she sometimes had swelling to both legs and feet. D.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure 1 (R #47) of 1 (R # 47) resident reviewed for weight loss received care and treatment that met the resident's needs by not following Dietician recommendations to weigh the resident weekly. This deficient practice is likely to result in weight loss or continued weight loss. The findings are: A. Record review of Progress Note, dated 10/10/23, revealed note by Registered Dietitian (RD) stated, Monthly weight - Problem: unplanned weight loss related to inadequate oral intake as evidenced by -5.5% weight loss in 1 month. Intervention: add Med Pass [name of medication drink that delivers more nutrition than water, juice or milk, with added protein and calories.] 4 ounces twice a day, weekly weight. B. Record review of weights and vitals revealed staff weighed R #47 on 09/06/23, and the resident weighed 148.4 lbs. (pounds). Staff weighed R #47 on 10/04/23, and the resident weighed 140.3 lbs. Staff did not record any other weights. C. Record review of Physicians Orders, dated 10/15/23, revealed the following: Weekly vital…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to implement pharmacist recommendation in a timely manner for 1 (R #9) out of 5 residents (R #2, R #23, R #42, R #43). This deficient practice is likely to result in more than minimal harm to R #9 by failing to ensure resident was free of any abnormal signs and symptoms of bleeding. The finding are: A. Record review of R #9 face sheet revealed resident was admitted on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #9 orders, dated 09/04/22, revealed an order for Eliquis (medication used to prevent blood clots) tablet, 5 mg, twice daily. C. Record review of pharmacist recommendations, dated 02/01/23, revealed the pharmacist made following recommendations for R #9: The resident has an order for Eliquis. Please add observation order: Monitor for signs and symptoms of bleeding and thromboembolism [obstruction of blood vessel] during each shift . D. Record review of R #9 orders, dated 06/02/23, revealed the following order: Monitor for signs and symptoms of bleeding, such as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure: 1. Personal items were not stored in the medication storage room. 2. Items were not stored under the sink in the medication storage room. 3. Medications stored on the East Medication Cart were kept in their original labeled packaging and in a manner that maintains the sterility of the product. These deficient practices is likely to negatively impact the health of all 57 residents that reside in the facility. They are likely to receive compromised or contaminated medications and medical supplies due to inappropriate storage. The findings are: A. On 10/24/23 at 3:45 pm during observation of the medication storage room, staff stored various personal items under the sink such as: one open bag of pretzels, one can of doctor pepper, one bottle of wine unopened which was not labeled with a resident identifier, seven unopened cups of applesauce, one curling iron, one perfume spray, paper cups, and plates. B. On 10/24/23 at 3:50 pm during interview with Certified Medication Aide (CMA) #1, she stated the bottle of wine belongs…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure facility hallways were clear of any obstructions and hallway handrails were not blocked for all 57 residents who wished to use handrails to self-propel or as a support when ambulating. This deficient practice is likely to cause residents to receive injuries related to tripping and falls. The findings are: A. On 10/23/23 at 10:16 AM during the initial tour and observation of the facility, seven storage bins sat in the hall next to the wall and blocked the handrail, between the entrances to rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]. B. On 10/26/23 at 4:31 PM during a walk through of the facility, the same storage bins sat in the same area and blocked the handrail between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]. C. On 10/26/23 at 4:38 PM during an interview with the Administrator (ADM), she stated the facility was small, and that was the only place they had to store the bins. ADM confirmed the bins blocked the residents' access to the handrail.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure 1 Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) out of 5 sampled CNA's had completed required annual skills competencies. This deficient practice is likely to result in the nurses aides not receiving the necessary training to meet the care needs of the residents. The findings are: A. Record review of the five sampled CNA personnel files revealed CNA #1 did not have annual skill competencies completed for year 2023. B. On 10/26/23 at 11:19 AM during an interview with Human Resources Director (HRD), she stated CNA #1 started in June of 2023 and should have already completed her annual skill competencies. C. On 10/26/23 at 5:00 PM during an interview with Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), she acknowledged CNA #1 had not completed her annual skills competencies. She further stated, I'd assume competencies would be completed the same day CNA is hired.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$91,403 in federal fines across 5 penalties.

  • $53,303 — penalty dated 2025-12-19
  • $4,938 — penalty dated 2024-02-12
  • $14,814 — penalty dated 2024-01-22
  • $14,113 — penalty dated 2023-12-26
  • $4,235 — penalty dated 2023-08-28

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to OPCO SKILLED MANAGEMENT — 66 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.2-0.2 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 51.7+1.3 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.3-0.3 vs chain
The other 65 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
1 of 5Bluebird Wellness And RehabilitationSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Brentwood Place ThreeDallas, TX 1 of 5Broadway Nursing & RehabilitationSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5Cameron Nursing CenterCameron, MO 1 of 5Carmel Hills Wellness & RehabilitationIndependence, MO 1 of 5Casa Arena Healthcare LLCAlamogordo, NM 1 of 5Casa Maria HealthcareRoswell, NM 1 of 5Forest Park Nursing & RehabilitationDallas, TX 1 of 5Fort Worth Wellness & RehabilitationFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Glenview Wellness & RehabilitationNorth Richland Hills, TX 1 of 5Highland Pines Nursing HomeLongview, TX 1 of 5Ivy Creek Wellness & RehabilitationWaco, TX 1 of 5Las Cruces Village Nursing & Rehabilitation LLCLas Cruces, NM 1 of 5Magnolia Wellness CenterSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Maple Grove Wellness & RehabilitationFenton, MO 1 of 5Mineola Gardens Wellness & RehabilitationMineola, TX 1 of 5Pine Grove ManorSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Rehab Of Kansas City SouthKansas City, MO 1 of 5The Hillcrest Of North DallasDallas, TX 1 of 5West Side Campus Of CareWhite Settlement, TX 1 of 5Willow Ridge Wellness & RehabilitationFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Willowcreek Wellness & RehabilitationFlorissant, MO 2 of 5Arbor Lake Nursing & Rehabilitation, LLCFort Worth, TX 2 of 5Aztec HealthcareAztec, NM 2 of 5Betty Dare Wellness & Rehabilitation LLCAlamogordo, NM 2 of 5Blue Springs Wellness & RehabilitationBlue Springs, MO 2 of 5Cypress Springs Wellness & RehabilitationMount Vernon, TX 2 of 5Fiesta Park Wellness & RehabilitationAlbuquerque, NM 2 of 5Hilltop At Blue River, TheKansas City, MO 2 of 5La Vida Buena HealthcareLas Vegas, NM 2 of 5McGregor Wellness & RehabilitationMc Gregor, TX 2 of 5Monarch Springs Wellness & RehabilitationUniversity City, MO 2 of 5Northrise Wellness & RehabilitationLas Cruces, NM 2 of 5Prescott Valley Nursing & RehabilitationPrescott Valley, AZ 2 of 5Prescott Village Nursing & RehabilitationPrescott, AZ 2 of 5Rehabilitation Center Of Independence, TheIndependence, MO 2 of 5San Antonio Wellness & RehabilitationSan Antonio, TX 2 of 5Skyline Nursing CenterDallas, TX 2 of 5Sunny Springs Nursing & RehabSulphur Springs, TX 2 of 5White Acres Wellness & RehabilitationEl Paso, TX

Showing 40 of 65; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
CASA HEALTHCARE, LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/01/2023
CALIBER ADVISORS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 10/01/2023
FIRST SWEETZER HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 10/01/2023
HATTERAS INVESTMENTS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 10/01/2023
GARETZ, DAVIDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/01/2023
GURWITZ, SOLOMONIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/03/2025
HAGINS, ELIZABETHIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/03/2025
KAPLAN, ESTHERIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/03/2025
KAPLAN, MOSHAIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/03/2025
MINDLE, ADAMIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/03/2025
STERNSHEIN, JENNIFERIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/03/2025
UNGER, JEFFREYIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/03/2025
ZIMMERMAN, CAROLINEIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/03/2025
1011 SOMBRILLO COURT NM, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2023
CONTINUUM REHAB GROUP LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2023
HALLMARK ADVISORS, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2023
HANSEN HUNTER LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2024
OPCO CA SKILLED MGMT INC.OrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2023
OPCO NM SKILLED MGMT, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2023
THE WRIGHT GROUP CONSULTING, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2024
WILSHIRE HEALTH REALTY, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2023
GREENBERG, DAVIDIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2024
HILL, CANISHAIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 10/14/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 23 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

12 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-25.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 65%Medicare 8%Other / private 27%

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$425per resident / day
operating cost
$12,921per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$339per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NM

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New Mexico Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in New Mexico
$9,125/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,633/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,950/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 325056. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next