No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Bluebird Wellness And Rehabilitation

9350 Green Park Road, Saint Louis, MO 63123 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 188 certified beds · (314) 845-0900 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0602) — cited Oct 2024Resident-funds citations (F0567, F0568, F0569)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)4 immediate-jeopardy citations$234,836 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Oct 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567, F0568, F0569)
  • inspectors cited 4 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (79) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $234,836 in federal fines (most recent 2024-06-18)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (62%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
11110 Lindbergh Business Ct · (314) 845-8888 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Nomax0.4 mi
9735 Green Park Industrial Dr · (314) 961-2500 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Aldi0.8 mi
11185 S Towne Sq · (855) 955-2534 · Call to confirm hours
Park
9517 Green Park Rd · (314) 615-4386 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
NLAS0.5 mi
104 OFallon Sq

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased6.8%18.1%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.9%5.3%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%1.1%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%2.3%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms19.6%18.5%6.5%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.8%4.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened5.6%17.4%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication17.6%25.6%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.3%90.9%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.1%4.5%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control19.8%17.8%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table19.9%23.5%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.9%2.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine23.0%63.5%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission12.8%26.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit16.6%13.7%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.222.111.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.082.331.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

32.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 35 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

32.3%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
44.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.13U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.06hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 44.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 34 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.13 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 10% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 25% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF32.3%CMS range 19.2–52.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.7%CMS range 6.9–14.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge44.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge44.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge41.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified93.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.3%CMS range 3.2–12.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.941.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.20
RN hours/ resident / day
0.71
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.05
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.96
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.11
RN hoursweekends
62.3%
Total nursing turnover
66.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 188 beds and averages 159.0 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 29 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.96 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.20 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.05 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.42 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.18 on weekdays — 24% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.24 to 0.11 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 62% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-08)
20
at the previous standard inspection (2024-02-13)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

79 citations, most serious first. The 18 most serious are shown; the remaining 61 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-10-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Deficiency Text Not Available

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-08-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    See Event ID 56TT13. This deficiency is uncorrected. For previous examples, refer to the Statement of Deficiencies dated 7/12/24. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed facility policies by failing to ensure nurses assessed and notified the physician of Resident #29's right buttock/right ischium (lower and back part of the hip bone) when Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) alerted the nurses of issues for the resident's skin and documented open areas on bath sheets. The resident also requested the facility's former Wound Nurse (WN) assess his/her bottom, but she refused. The resident's request was witnessed by CNA N. The resident was later hospitalized for assessment and treatment of an unstageable pressure injury (slough (yellow or white tissue that adheres to the ulcer bed in strings or thick clumps, or is mucinous) and/or eschar (black, brown, or tan tissue that adheres firmly to the wound bed or ulcer edges, may be softer or harder than surrounding skin) to the right ischium that was infected and required intravenous (IV)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-07-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    See Event ID 56TT12. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure treatments were completed as ordered by the physician for three residents (Resident #19, #21, and #22). Facility nursing staff documented the treatments as completed, although they were not completed. The facility identified 15 residents with pressure ulcers. Four were sampled and problems were found with three. The census was 164.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-06-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure treatments were completed as ordered by the physician for three residents (Resident #19, #21, and #22). Facility nursing staff documented the treatments as completed, although they were not completed. The facility identified 15 residents with pressure ulcers. Four were sampled and problems were found with three. The census was 164. Review of the facility's undated Skin Care & Wound Management Overview policy and procedure, included the following: -Definitions: Pressure ulcer is defined as a localized injury to skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure in combination with shear and/or friction; -Policy: -The facility staff strives to prevent resident skin impairment and to promote the healing of existing wounds. The interdisciplinary team works with the resident and/or family/responsible party to identify and implement interventions to prevent and treat potential skin integrity issues. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-08-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    See Event ID 56TT13. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policies by failing to promptly assess one resident's right hip wound after a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) reported the wound to a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) the day before it was assessed and a treatment had been started (Resident #36). Another resident said he/she had reported his/her bottom was sore to staff and no one assessed his/her bottom until two days later when a wound was identified (Resident #39). Both residents complained the facility's largest incontinent briefs were too small and caused the wounds. In addition, staff failed to promptly assess and treat one resident with a right palm laceration. After waiting approximately one hour for staff to treat the laceration, the resident returned to his/her room without receiving treatment (Resident #3). The census was 156.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-08-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    See Event ID 56TT13. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate nursing assessments per facility policy for residents with a tracheostomy (a procedure to help air and oxygen reach the lungs by creating an opening into the trachea (windpipe) from outside the neck), diagnosed with respiratory infection and vomiting. The facility identified seven residents with tracheostomy, three were sampled and failures were found with two (Resident #6 and #44). The census was 156.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-06-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policies by failing to promptly assess one resident's right hip wound after a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) reported the wound to a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) the day before it was assessed and a treatment had been started (Resident #36). Another resident said he/she had reported his/her bottom was sore to staff and no one assessed his/her bottom until two days later when a wound was identified (Resident #39). Both residents complained the facility's largest incontinent briefs were too small and caused the wounds. In addition, staff failed to promptly assess and treat one resident with a right palm laceration. After waiting approximately one hour for staff to treat the laceration, the resident returned to his/her room without receiving treatment (Resident #3). The census was 156. Review of the facility Wound Management policy, revised on 6/2020, showed the following: -Purpose: To provide a system for the treatment and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-06-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate nursing assessments per facility policy for residents with a tracheostomy (a procedure to help air and oxygen reach the lungs by creating an opening into the trachea (windpipe) from outside the neck), diagnosed with respiratory infection and vomiting. The facility identified seven residents with tracheostomy, three were sampled and failures were found with two (Resident #6 and #44). The census was 156. Review of the facility's Tracheostomy (Trach) Care policy, dated 6/2020, showed: -Tracheostomy care will be performed as ordered by the Attending Physician. -Licensed Nurses or a Respiratory Therapist (RT) may perform tracheostomy care. -Report any unusual observations to the Attending Physician immediately. -Document the care provided, the resident's response, any unusual observations, and physician notification as indicated in the medical record. Monitor vital signs and report abnormal findings to the medical provider. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders and facility policy when anti-anxiety medications were not administered as ordered for one resident (Resident #4). The sample was 8. The census was 151.Review of the facility's undated Medication - Administration policy showed:-Purpose: To provide practice standards for safe administration of medications for residents in the facility;-Policy:--Medication will be administered by a Licensed Nurse per the order of an attending physician or licensed independent practitioner, or as consistent with state law;--Medications must be given to the resident by the Licensed Nurse preparing the medication, or as consistent with state law;--Medications may be administered one hour before or after the scheduled medication administration time;--Medications and treatments will be administered only by Licensed Medical or Licensed Nursing Staff;-Procedure:--If resident is refusing to take medication, the Licensed Nurse who is passing the medications will initial and draw a circle around his/her initials in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents for one resident (Resident #2) when one staff repositioned the resident, who had a diagnosis of quadriplegia (loss or partial loss of movement and sensation in all four limbs) onto their side and left the resident unattended to obtain supplies. When the staff member returned to the room, the resident was on the floor. The sample was 16. The census was 158.The administrator was notified on 10/9/25 at 6:30 P.M., of past noncompliance which began on 8/9/25. Once the nurse was made aware of the incident, he/she assessed the resident, completed a skin and pain assessment, administered pain medication, started neurological checks, and notified the Medical Doctor (MD). The resident complained of pain and requested to go to the hospital. The resident was sent out to be evaluated. The facility obtained a statement from the Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) and the resident. Staff were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident's were free from accident hazards during resident smoking and in the smoking areas. The smoking area showed evidence of unsafe smoking practices such as trash in the ash bins and cigarette butts on the ground. Residents who smoke were not accurately and completely assessed for their ability to smoke safely. In addition, the facility did not follow their smoking policy as it relates to assessment, supervision, and securing smoking materials for three of four residents investigated for safe smoking practices (Residents #94, #4, and #16). The census was 165. The sample was 33. Review of the facility's Smoking by Residents policy, dated 6, 2020, showed:-To respect resident choices to smoke and to maintain a safe healthy environment for both smokers and non-smokers;-The facility permits smoking only in area(s) designated by the facility's safety committee;-The facility discourages smoking by residents and ensures that those…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were labeled and stored appropriately. The facility identified seven medication/treatment carts and two medication rooms. Four of the seven carts and both medication rooms were checked for medication storage. Issues were found in all four medication carts. Staff failed to discard expired bottles of over the counter (OTC) medications, and a bottle of Pro-Stat protein drink (increases wound healing). In addition, the staff failed to refrigerate a bottle of Latanoprost eye drops (treats glaucoma, an eye condition that causes blindness), a bottle of Lorazepam (used to treat anxiety), and a vial of tuberculin purified protein derivative (PPD, used to diagnose silent (latent) tuberculosis (TB) infection) solution. Furthermore, the staff failed to label one insulin pen with a resident's name. The census was 165.Review of the Facility's Storage of Medication, dated 9/2018, showed:-Policy: Medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly, following manufactures…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-08 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to honor one resident's Durable Power of Attorney (DPOA, a legal document that allows a person to appoint another person to manage their financial and/or healthcare matters) to act on their behalf on financial matters (Resident #174). The facility failed get signed authorization from the resident's DPOA to open a resident trust account and to have his/her Social Security directly deposited into the resident trust account. In addition, the facility failed to notify the resident and his/her DPOA of a debited care cost at the time the resident was discharged from the facility. The census was 165. Review of Resident #174's face sheet, showed:-admitted on [DATE];-discharged on 7/11/25. Review of the resident's medical record, showed:-A Durable Power of Attorney (DPOA, a legal document that allows someone to appoint another person to act on their behalf in financial and/or medical matters), signed on 4/22/23, showed:-The DPOA was designated to act as initialed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-08 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure recommendations from a Level two Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) were incorporated into the plan of care for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for PASARR (Resident #119). This failure had the potential to negatively affect the resident's mental and psychosocial well-being. The census was 165.Review of Resident #119's medical record, showed:-The resident was admitted on [DATE];-The resident resided in a Medicaid certified bed;-A PASARR Level II Evaluation, Section II, dated 6/25/25, showed diagnoses included cerebral palsy (disorder of movement, muscle tone, or posture), learning disorder, and paraplegia (paralysis of both legs);-A PASARR Level II Summary of Findings, dated 6/27/25, showed:-The PASARR Level II Evaluation indicated the following supports and services are to be provided by the facility;-Medication therapy;-Crisis intervention services;-Discharge planning;-Structured development;-Personal support network. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-08 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide services per professional standards for one resident who had an order for daily wound care and the treatment was not completed over the weekend (Resident #26). Staff failed to ensure one resident's treatment was applied as needed for a cancer lesion with drainage that was not covered and exposed (Resident #130). In addition, staff failed to obtain weights on one resident per their policy. When the weight was obtained, the resident had experienced a weight loss (Resident #1). The census was 165. The sample was 33.Review of the facility's Wound Management policy dated June 2020, showed:-Purpose: To provide a system for the treatment and management of residents with wounds including pressure and non-pressure injuries;-A resident who has a wound will receive necessary treatment and services to promote healing, prevent infections, and prevent new pressure injuries from developing;-The attending physician will be notified to advise on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with acceptable standards of practice, for one resident who had a fall. Staff failed to follow their fall policy and failed to document the circumstances of the fall, assessment of the resident, and/or complete neurological checks on the shift that the fall occurred. In addition, the staff present at the time of the fall failed to report the fall to the physician or the oncoming shift. During the next shift, approximately 8 hours after the fall, the resident was found with significant facial bruising of unknown origin that was only determined to be a fall after interview with the resident and the resident's roommate (Resident #22). The census was 165. The sample was 33. Review of the facility's undated Fall Management Program policy, showed:-Purpose: To prevent resident falls and minimize complications associated with falls through the development of a fall management program;-The facility will provide the highest quality care in the safety environment for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-08 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy for dialysis (a procedure that cleanses the blood of its impurities) when staff failed to document pre/post dialysis assessments. The facility identified five residents who received dialysis services. Two residents were sampled, and issues was found with one (Resident #150). The sample was 33. The census was 165. Review of the facility's Dialysis Care Policy, revised 6/20, showed:-Policy: the facility will be responsible for the overall care delivered to the resident, monitoring of the resident prior to and after the completion of each dialysis treatment, and providing for all non- dialysis needs of the resident including during the time period when the resident is receiving dialysis;-Arteriovenous (AV) Shunt/Fistula (surgically created by connecting an artery and vein to provide a stable access point for dialysis), inspect shunt site area for color, warmth, redness, tenderness, pain, edema, drainage, and bruit (a pulsation felt of blood flow anastomosis (connection made surgically between…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-08 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their policy and procedure for the monthly drug regimen review by failing to ensure the physician or designee responded to the pharmacy recommendation timely for two of five residents sampled for medication review (Residents #3 and #145). The sample was 33. The census was 165.Review of the facility's Documentation and Communication of Consultant Pharmacist Recommendations Policy, dated 8/20, showed:-Policy: The consultant pharmacist works with the facility to establish a system whereby the consultant pharmacist observations and recommendations regarding residents' medication therapies are communicated to those with authority and/or responsibility to implement the recommendations and are responded to in an appropriate and timely fashion;-Recommendations: A record of the consultant pharmacist's observations and recommendations is made available in an easily retrievable form to nurses, prescribers, and the care planning team;-Comments and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 61 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-08 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure reach resident relieves food choices that accommodate their preferences, for one resident (Resident #171) who preferred chocolate milk with all meals and was not provided with chocolate milk. The census was 165. The sample was 33.Review of the Know Your Rights, resident rights poster, located at the nurse stations, showed residents have the right to participate in their care. Review of Resident #171's medical record, showed:-Diagnoses included: Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) after a stroke and diabetes;-A nutritional communication form, dated 7/29/25, showed meal location preference: In room. Moderately thick liquids. During an interview on 8/4/25 at 9:18 A.M., the resident said he/she has not had breakfast yet. When he/she gets his/her breakfast he/she wants chocolate milk. It is on his/her ticket for each meal, yet he/she is never given chocolate milk. The resident provided his/her dinner meal ticket, that remained on his/her bedside table from the day prior. Review of the resident's meal ticket…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide services per acceptable standards of practice for one resident (Resident #8) when a Certified Medication Technician (CMT) administered a medication without a physician's order. The sample size was 8. The census was 174. Review of the facility's Medication Administration policy, undated, showed: -Purpose: To provide practice standards for safe administration of medications for residents in the facility; -Policy: Medication will be administered by a licensed nurse per the order of the attending physician or licensed independent practitioner, or as consistent with state law; -Procedure: Compare the licensed practitioner's prescription/order with the medication administration record (MAR); -Compare the licensed practitioner's order with the pharmacy label on the medication package; -Compare the pharmacy label and MAR; -The licensed nurse will chart the drug, time administered, and initial his/her name with each medication administration and sign full name and title on each page of the MAR; -PRN (As needed)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-26 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide or obtain laboratory services to meet the needs of residents for one of eight sampled residents (Resident #2). The census was 174. Review of the facility's Refusal of Treatment policy, revised 8/2020, showed: -Purpose: To ensure that residents are able to exercise their right to refuse treatment; -Policy: Facility will honor a resident's request not to receive medical treatment as prescribed by his/her attending physician, as well as care services outlined on the resident's assessment and care plan. treatment is defined as care provided for purposes of maintaining/restoring health, improving functional level, or relieving symptoms; -Procedure: The resident is not forced to accept any medical treatment and may refuse or request to discontinue of a specific treatment even though it is prescribed by his/her attending physician. When a resident refuses or discontinues treatment, the charge nurse or Director of Nursing (DON) interviews the resident to determine what and why the resident is refusing or discontinuing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff used acceptable infection control procedures during blood sugar testing and insulin administration for one sampled resident (Residents #5). The census was 174. Review of the facility's Handwashing/Hand Hygiene policy, revised August 2019, showed: -Policy Statement: This facility considers hand hygiene the primary means to prevent the spread of infections; -Policy Interpretation and Implementation: All personnel shall be trained and regularly in-serviced on the importance of hand hygiene in preventing the transmission of healthcare-associated infections; -All personnel shall follow the handwashing/hand hygiene procedures to help prevent the spread of infections to other personnel, residents, and visitors; -Hand hygiene products and supplies (sinks, soap, towels, alcohol-based hand rub, etc.) shall be readily accessible and convenient for staff use to encourage compliance with hand hygiene policies; -Wash hands with soap (antimicrobial or non-antimicrobial) and water for the following situations:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-15 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Deficiency Text Not Available

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-27 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    See Event ID 56TT13. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a sufficient number of skilled licensed nurses were on duty each shift to provide nursing care to all residents in accordance with resident care plans and per the facility assessment. The facility failed to ensure a licensed nurse was on duty each shift, for the rehab building. This resulted in four residents (Residents #16, #44, #6, and #45) not receiving tube feedings (enteral nutrition, used to give medicines and liquids, including liquid nutrition, through a small tube placed through abdomen into the stomach) and not receiving medication as ordered. Three residents (Residents #16, #44, and #6) did not receive tracheostomy (trach, a procedure to help air and oxygen reach the lungs by creating an opening into the trachea (windpipe) from outside the neck) care. The sample was 28. The census was 156.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-27 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    See Event ID 56TT13. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards of practice when staff failed to ensure one resident wore a compression suit (applied to reduce edema (swelling) and increase circulation) on the lower extremities every night for one hour (Resident #28). In addition, staff failed to ensure one resident received a glucose monitoring device as ordered (Resident #6). The sample size was 28. The census was 156.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-27 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    See Event ID 56TT13. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors. Staff failed to administer seizure medication for three residents (Residents #45, #6, and #16). Staff failed to administer two antibiotics to one resident (Resident #6). Staff failed to administer an anticoagulant (medication used to prevent blood clots) to one resident (Resident #45). The facility staff failed to notify the physician and resident representative (RR) of the medication errors. This failure put the residents at risk for significant medication errors that go unreported to the physician, resulting in potential for compilations related to missed doses. The sample was 28. The census was 156.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    See Event ID 56TT13. This deficiency is uncorrected. For previous examples, refer to the Statement of Deficiencies dated 6/18/24 and 7/12/24. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate resident records and follow their policy for resident change in condition. On 8/4/24, one resident had a change in condition and went to the hospital where he/she was admitted . The resident's electronic health record (EHR) showed no documentation on 8/4/24, regarding the resident's change in condition, physician notification, and/or the time the resident eventually went to the hospital (Resident #29). In addition, the facility failed to ensure two residents' electronic Medication Administration Record (eMAR) and electronic Treatment Administration Record (eTAR) were completed per facility policies and procedures. Both residents' eMAR and eTAR had numerous blanks with no documentation as to why there were blanks (Residents #3 and #24). The sample size was 28. The census was 156.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-12 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    See Event ID 56TT12. This deficiency is uncorrected. For previous examples, refer to the Statement of Deficiencies dated 6/18/24. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%. Out of 25 opportunities for errors, two errors occurred, resulting in an 8.0% medication error rate (Residents #15). The census was 164.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    See Event ID 56TT12. This deficiency is uncorrected. For previous examples, refer to the Statement of Deficiencies dated 6/18/24. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff accurately documented on the treatment administration record (TAR) when pressure ulcer (localized damage to the skin caused by prolonged pressure) treatments were not completed as ordered for three residents (Residents #19, #21 and #22). In addition, one resident (Resident #15) requested and received pain medication without staff documenting the medication was given, including where the resident's pain was located, and the intensity of the resident's pain. The census was 164.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-18 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a sufficient number of skilled licensed nurses were on duty each shift to provide nursing care to all residents in accordance with resident care plans and per the facility assessment. The facility failed to ensure a licensed nurse was on duty each shift, for the rehab building. This resulted in four residents (Residents #16, #44, #6, and #45) not receiving tube feedings (enteral nutrition, used to give medicines and liquids, including liquid nutrition, through a small tube placed through abdomen into the stomach) and not receiving medication as ordered. Three residents (Residents #16, #44, and #6) did not receive tracheostomy (trach, a procedure to help air and oxygen reach the lungs by creating an opening into the trachea (windpipe) from outside the neck) care. The sample was 28. The census was 156. 1. Review of the facility's Facility Assessment Tool, last reviewed on 8/2/24, showed: -Requirement: Nursing facilities will conduct,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-18 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%. Out of 43 opportunities for errors, seven errors occurred, resulting in an 16.28% medication error rate (Residents #11, #3, #8, #10 and #9). The medication pass sample size was five, and problems were found with all five. The census was 157. Review of the facility's Physician Orders policy, undated, included the following: -Policy: It is the policy of this facility to provide resident centered care that meets the psychosocial, physical and emotional needs and concerns of the residents. The safety of residents, staff and visitors is of primary importance. The purpose of this policy is to provide guidance for licensed nurses and licensed therapist to accurately document physician and provider orders as determined by the licensee's Scope of Practice; -Procedure: I. Medical Orders Transcription; II. Taking the order: a. Write down the order as stated; f. Place orders in electronic Medical Record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff did not document medications as provided on the medication administration record when the medications were not actually provided. Staff failed to document why the medications were not provided for 5 of 6 sampled residents that were observed for a medication administration pass (Residents #11, #3, #8, #9, #10). The census was 157. Review of the facility Physician Orders policy, undated, included the following: -Policy: It is the policy of this facility to provide resident centered care that meets the psychosocial, physical and emotional needs and concerns of the residents. The safety of residents, staff and visitors is of primary importance. The purpose of this policy is to provide guidance for licensed nurses and licensed therapist to accurately document physician and provider orders as determined by the licensee's Scope of Practice; -Procedure: I. Medical Orders Transcription; II. Taking the order: a. Write down the order as stated; f.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards of practice when staff failed to ensure one resident wore a compression suit (applied to reduce edema (swelling) and increase circulation) on the lower extremities every night for one hour (Resident #28). In addition, staff failed to ensure one resident received a glucose monitoring device as ordered (Resident #6). The sample size was 28. The census was 156. 1. Review of Resident #28's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 8/24/24, showed: -Adequate hearing; -Makes Self Understood: Understood; -Ability To Understand Others: Understands - clear comprehension; -Moderately impaired cognition; -Rejection of Care: Behavior not exhibited; -Diagnosis of high blood pressure. Review of the resident's Physician's Order Sheet (POS), showed: -5/30/24: Apply compression suit to the bilateral lower extremities at hour of sleep…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-18 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors. Staff failed to administer seizure medication for three residents (Residents #45, #6, and #16). Staff failed to administer two antibiotics to one resident (Resident #6). Staff failed to administer an anticoagulant (medication used to prevent blood clots) to one resident (Resident #45). The facility staff failed to notify the physician and resident representative (RR) of the medication errors. This failure put the residents at risk for significant medication errors that go unreported to the physician, resulting in potential for compilations related to missed doses. The sample was 28. The census was 156. 1. Review of the facility's Facility Assessment Tool, last reviewed on 8/2/24, showed: -Requirement: Nursing facilities will conduct, document, and annually review a facility-wide assessment, which includes both their resident population and the resources the facility needs to care for their…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-13 · tag F0568 — pattern
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain an accurate accounting of all monies held in the resident trust fund account by not reconciling each month. The facility managed funds for 95 residents. The facility census was 137. Record review of the facility maintained bank statements for months 01/2023 through 12/2023, showed no documentation of complete reconciliations with a zero balance. Record review of the facility maintained reconciliation forms, dated 01/2023 through 12/2023, showed the attempted reconciliations did not reconcile to the residents' current balance at the time of reconciliation. During an interview on 2/07/24 at 9:15 A.M., the Business Office Assistant said they were working on clearing out old checks that went back at least two years. The Business Office Manager (BOM) said she'd received an email a few weeks ago to resolve the issue with the outstanding checks, but had not gotten to it. The BOM could void and reissue the outstanding checks. The bank account and the resident trust fund account could not be reconciled due to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-13 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to follow their policy by not maintaining grievances for three years. The sample was 27. The census was 137. Review of the facility's Resident Grievance Policy, dated 9/2/16, showed: -Grievance: an official statement of a complaint over something believed to be wrong or unfair; -Grievance Official: The person designated by the Administrator to receive all grievances to be investigated by the grievance committee. This role defaults to the Director of Social Services unless otherwise designated differently by the Administrator; -Policy: This facility will provide a venue for residents, and others involved in patient care, to voice concerns, complaints, or grievances to facility leadership and external parties; -Procedure: Upon receipt of an oral, written, or anonymous grievance submitted by a resident, the Grievance Official will take immediate action to prevent further potential violations of any resident right while the alleged violation is being investigated, if indicated; - The Grievance Committee/Grievance Official shall…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-13 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and ensure newly hired employees were screened to determine the presence of a federal indicator with the Nurse Aide Registry (NA) check for three of 10 sampled employees hired since the last survey. The facility hired at least 648 new employees since the last survey. The census was 137. Review of the facility's undated Missouri Abuse, Neglect and Misappropriation Policies and Standard Procedures, showed: -Policy: It is the intent of this facility to prevent the abuse, mistreatment, or neglect of residents or the misappropriation of their property and to provide guidance to direct staff to manage any concerns or allegations of abuse, neglect or misappropriation of their property. Furthermore, it is the intent of this facility to employ only properly screened persons as a part of the resident's care team by the applicable requirements; -Procedure for Screening: Licensure/registry check will also be performed, as applicable, after the interview to verify: -The Nurse Aide Registry; -State Board of Nursing;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had complete, accurate and individualized care plans to address specific needs of the residents for 12 of 27 sampled residents (Residents #100, #63, #104, #72, #30, #91, #281, #117, #20, #69, #79 and #109). In addition, the facility also failed to hold care plan meetings in a timely manner. The census was 137. Review of the facility's undated Plan of Care Overview Policies and Standard Procedures, showed: -Definitions: The plan of care, also care plan is the written treatment provided for a resident that is resident-focused and provides for optimal personalized care; -Policy: It is the policy of this facility to provide resident centered care that meets the psychosocial, physical and emotional needs and concerns of the residents; -Procedure: General Care Planning Goals and Guidelines; -Resident/representatives will have the right to participate in the development and implementation of his/her own plan of care including but…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards of practice when staff failed to discard expired intravenous (IV, medical technique that administers fluids, medication, and nutrients directly into the vein) therapy supplies, in two of two medication rooms checked. The facility had four medication rooms. The census was 137. Observation of the cabinets in the Rehab Hall medication room, on [DATE] at 10:16 A.M., showed: -IV therapy supplies placed in a black storage bin with a yellow lid. The contents of the storage bin included: -DermaView II Transparent Film dressing (a moisture-vapor permeable transparent dressing that aids in the prevention of bacterial contamination), 14 pieces, expired [DATE]; -Ultrasite Valve connectors (a needleless connector that can be used anywhere a standard injection cap is used), 7 pieces, expired 5/2021; -BD Vacutainer Safety-Lok Butterfly Blood collection kit (a safety mechanism that can be activated immediately after the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who required assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs), were provided adequate assistance during meals (Resident #27 and Resident #13). The facility also failed to ensure one resident (Resident #72) received assistance with personal care, hygiene and showers to meet the resident's needs. The sample was 27. The census was 137. Review of the facility's Routine Resident Care policy, undated, showed: -It is the policy of this facility to promote resident centered care by attending to the total medical, nursing, physical, emotional, mental, social, and spiritual needs and honor resident lifestyle preferences while in the care of this facility; -Definition: Routine Resident Care: Care that is not necessarily medically or clinically based but necessary for quality of life promoting dignity and independence, as appropriate; -Provide routine daily care by a certified nursing assistant with specialized training in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-13 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure bed rails were accurately assessed as a necessary device prior to installation and use for three sampled residents (Residents #72, #117 and #20). The facility also failed to document usage in the residents' care plans. The sample was 27. The census was 139. Review of the facility's undated Safe Use of Bed Rails Policies and Standard Procedures, showed: -Definitions: Bed rails are adjustable metal or rigid plastic bars that attach to the bed. They are available in a variety of type, shapes and sizes ranging from one-half, one-quarter, or one-eighth lengths. Bed rails are intended to provide assistance to the bed occupant in moving on the bed surface, or in entering or exiting the bed, to minimize the possibility of falling out of bed while moving on the bed surface or transferring out of bed, assist individuals who are disabled, injured or recovering from surgery to reposition or transfer in and out of bed, or to mitigate the risk of falling due to the effects of balance or other medical conditions;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were labeled and stored per acceptable standards of practice. The facility identified 11 medication/treatment carts and four medication rooms. Six of the 11 carts and two medication rooms were checked for medication storage. Issues were found in the medication rooms and in the medication carts. Staff failed to separate medications and food storage in the medication room refrigerators, date an opened vial of tuberculin purified protein derivative (PPD, used to diagnose silent (latent) tuberculosis (TB) infection) solution and insulin solution (used to treat high blood sugar) vials and pens. Staff failed to keep Lorazepam (used to treat anxiety) liquid medication in the refrigerator. and place two locks on the substance controlled medication storage. The census was 137. Review of the facility's Storage of Medication Policy, dated 9/2018, showed: -Policy: Medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly, following manufacturer's recommendations or those of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-13 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the pureed (cooked food that has been ground, pressed, blended or sieved to the consistency of a creamy paste or liquid) diet recipe, and ensure residents on pureed diets were served a pureed diet. This practice affected 7 residents with pureed diets. The census was 137. Review of the Therapeutic Diets Policy, undated, showed: -Policy Statement: All residents have a diet order, including regular, therapeutic, and texture modification, that is prescribed by the attending physician, physician extender, or credentialed practitioner in accordance with applicable regulatory guidelines. -Definitions: Therapeutic diet is defined as a diet ordered by a physician, or delegated registered or licensed dietitian, as part of the treatment for a disease or clinical condition. The purpose of a therapeutic diet is to eliminate or decrease specific nutrients in the diet (sodium), or to increase specific nutrients in the diet (potassium), or to provide food that a resident is able to eat (mechanically altered diet.);…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to serve food under sanitary conditions by not ensuring staff followed proper hand hygiene techniques, by not changing gloves and washing hands, touching the surface of plates and utensils with soiled gloved and bare hands, and touching food items with soiled gloved hands. These deficient practices had the potential to affect all residents who ate at the facility. The census was 137. Review of the Facility Handwashing Procedure for Dining Services Policy, undated, showed: -Purpose: To provide personnel with a simple, practical and easy-to-implement procedure for hand washing on the units, in the kitchen, or in the dining room; -The following is a list of some situations that require hand hygiene: -When coming on duty; -After handling soiled equipment or utensils; -After removing gloves or aprons; -In between glove changes (for example, when changing tasks); -After removing gloves (for example, when exiting the kitchen or at the end of your shift) Before putting on a fresh pair of gloves (for example, when beginning your shift);…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-13 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — pattern
    Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff completed routine and resident specific inspections of bed frames, mattresses and bed rails as part of a routine maintenance program, to identify possible areas of entrapment for 12 of 27 sampled residents (Residents #281, #3, #63, #100, #117, #20, #30, #91, #104, #72, #79 and #69). The census was 137. Review of the facility's Safe Use of Bed Rails Policy, undated, showed: -Definition: Bed Rails: are adjustable metal or rigid plastic bars that attach to the bed. They are available in a variety of type, shapes, and sizes ranging from full to one-half, one-quarter, or one-eighth lengths. Also, some bed rails are not designed as part of the bed by the manufacturer and may be installed on or used along the side of a bed. Examples of bed rails include but are not limited to side rails, bed side rails, and safety rails; grab bars and assist bars. Bed rails are intended to provide assistance to the bed occupant in moving on the bed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to uphold the rights to a dignified existence and self determination were honored for two residents when a resident with contracted (a fixed tightening of muscle, tendons, ligaments, or skin) hands was not assisted with eating, resulting in the resident eating off of the table (Resident #27). In addition, staff failed to ensure a visually impaired resident knew the location of his/her utensils, resulting in the resident eating with his/her hands (Resident #13). This had the potential to affect all residents who required assistance with eating. The sample was 27. The census was 137. 1. Review of Resident #27's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 12/10/23 showed: -Cognitively impaired; -Eating: Independent, completes the activity by himself/herself with no assistance; -Weight stable; -Diagnoses included arthritis, dementia, and malnutrition. Review of the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-13 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician when one resident's blood sugar level was outside the parameters as ordered (Resident #282). The census was 137. Review of the facility's undated Physician Orders policy, showed to notify the attending or other providers as appropriate. Document contacts in the medical record. Review of Resident #282 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff) dated 2/8/23, showed: -Cognitively intact; -Diagnoses included: diabetes, kidney insufficiency, malnutrition, and depression; Review of the resident's care plan, in use at the time of survey, showed: -Focus: Resident has diabetes, type 2 (adult on-set) diabetes mellitus; -Goal: Will be free from any signs of symptoms of hypoglycemia (low blood sugar)/ hyperglycemia (high blood sugar) through next review; -Interventions: Administer insulin injections per orders. Obtain blood sugars per orders. Report abnormal findings to medical provider. Review of the Resident's facility admission communication, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-13 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Pre-admission Screen and Resident Review (PASARR) Level II screen was completed prior to admission for one of 27 sampled residents (Resident #69). This created a potential failure to identify what specialized or rehabilitative services the resident needed and whether placement in the facility was appropriate prior to admission. The census was 137. Review of the facility's PASRR policy, dated 8/11/2020 and reviewed on 8/14/2020, showed: -PASRR is a federal requirement to help ensure that individuals are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care. PASRR requires that Medicaid-certified nursing facilities develop the PASRR program to prevent inappropriate admission and retention of people with mental disabilities in nursing facilities; -Policy: All individuals who apply for admission to a Medicaid certified nursing facility must be screened for a PASRR disability whether they have such a disability and, if so, whether they…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide wound care per acceptable standards of practice for one closed record sampled resident (Resident #282) investigated for wounds when staff failed to obtain treatment orders and/or transcribe physician orders accurately or timely after a resident was admitted with wounds. The census was 137. The administrator was notified on 2/13/24, of the past non-compliance. The facility hired a full-time wound nurse in May of 2023. The facility identified an issue with wounds in June 2023. The facility did a full facility audit and obtained a contract for a new wound company. The new wound company started in July 2023. Staff was in-serviced on the new practices and the new practice was posted at the nurse's station. The deficiency was corrected on 7/23/23. Review of the facility's undated Skin Care and Wound Management Overview, showed: -The facility staff strive to prevent resident skin impairment and to promote the healing of existing wounds; -Review and select the appropriate treatment for the identified skin impairment;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pressure ulcer (injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue, as a result of pressure or friction) care and assessment per acceptable standards of practice for one closed record sampled resident (Resident #282) investigated for wounds when staff failed to obtain treatment orders and/or transcribe physician orders accurately or timely after the resident was admitted with pressure ulcers. The census was 137. The administrator was notified on 2/13/24, of the past non-compliance. The facility hired a full-time wound nurse in May of 2023. The facility identified an issue with wounds in June 2023. The facility did a full facility audit and obtained a contract for a new wound company. The new wound company started in July 2023. Staff was in-serviced on the new practices and the new practice was posted at the nurse's station. The deficiency was corrected on 7/23/23. Review of the facility's undated Skin Care and Wound Management Overview, showed: -The facility staff strive to prevent resident skin impairment and to promote…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-13 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with limited mobility received appropriate services, equipment and assistance to maintain or improve mobility for two residents (Residents #30 and #117). The census was 137. Review of the facility's undated Restorative Programs policy, showed: -It is the policy of this facility to provide resident centered care that meets the psychosocial, physical and emotional needs and concerns of the residents; -Safety is a primary concern for the residents, staff and visitors; -The purpose of this policy is to provide direction and guidance to the clinical team to assess and implement a plan of action for resident-specific care to maintain or improve mobility with the maximum practicable independence unless a reduction in mobility is demonstrably unavoidable; -Resident evaluation for consideration of the restorative treatment plan will include but is not limited to: -Cognitive abilities to participate independently or with assistance;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-13 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide one resident with a therapeutic tube feeding (a tube inserted directly into the stomach to provide food, fluids, and medications when one cannot eat or drink safely by mouth) diet as ordered for one resident (Resident #281) investigated for nutrition via a gastric tube (g-tube) of six residents identified by the facility as receiving tube feedings. The census was 137. Review of the facility's Enteral General Nutritional Guidelines policy, dated 9/21, showed: -Definitions: Feeding Tube: for the purpose of this policy, a feeding tube is an external device surgically placed through an artificial opening in the abdominal wall for the purpose of nutrition, hydration and/or medication delivery; -Policy: Enteral feedings are provided by bolus (intermittent), or continuous delivery. Continuous nutritional meals will utilize an electronic programmable pump to deliver the required amount of solution over time unless the physician and/or Registered Dietitian determine that the specific needs for a resident would…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-13 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to obtain stop dates of 14 days or less, on PRN (as needed) psychotropic medications (a chemical substance that changes brain function and results in alterations in perception, mood, consciousness or behavior) for two residents (Resident #5 and Resident #69). The sample was 27. The census was 137. Review of the facility's Medication Regimen Review Policy, undated, showed: -Definitions: Non-urgent medication irregularities: items that will be addressed with the attending physician in a manner that meets the needs of the resident, but no later than their next routine visit to assess the resident or 60 days whichever is sooner; -Unnecessary drug: Any drug when used: 1) in excessive dose (including duplicative therapy), 2) in excessive duration 3) without adequate monitoring, 4) without adequate indications for its use 5) in the presence of adverse consequences 6) any combination of the reasons stated; -Psychotropic medication: Any drug that affects brain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-13 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors, when staff failed to administer one resident's nicotine patch, which caused the resident discomfort (Resident #72). The sample was 27. The census was 137. Review of the facility's Medication Administration Policy, undated, showed: -It is the policy of this facility to provide resident centered care that meets the psychosocial, physical and emotional needs and concerns of the residents; -The purpose of this policy is to provide guidance for general medication administration to be provided by personnel recognized as legally able to administer; -Administer medication only as prescribed by the provider. Review of Resident #72's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff), dated 1/8/24, showed: -Mild cognitive impairment; -Exhibited no behaviors; -Walking and Wheelchair use not attempted due to medical condition or safety concerns; -Diagnoses included traumatic spinal cord dysfunction and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY See Event ID 2CK112 Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment by failing to provide a dining room at meal time for residents who resided in the Rehabilitation Building. The facility had a dining room in the Rehabilitation Building which had been closed since the beginning of the COVID epidemic. Residents ate all meals in their rooms. In addition, residents who resided in the Rehabilitation Building said they often were served plastic utensils at meals rather than metal. Twenty residents resided in the Rehabilitation Building and seven of seven interviewed all said they wanted to eat in the dining room, and preferred to use metal utensils (Residents #8, #9, #5, #10, #7, #6 and #4). The census was 116. Review of the Dining Services Department Policy and Procedure Manual revised 9/2017, showed: Policy Statement: Professional Staffing: The dining service department will employ sufficient staff to carry out the functions of food and nutrition services, taking into…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-25 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — pattern
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY See Event ID 2CK112 Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure dietary staffing was sufficient to open the dining room located in the Rehabilitation Building where 20 residents resided. All meals were prepared in the Long Term Care kitchen and brought to the Rehabilitation Building where residents ate in their rooms. Two residents said they had been told the facility lacked the dietary staff to open the Rehabilitation Building dining room. (Resident #8 and #9). The census was 116. Review of the Dining Services Department Policy and Procedure Manual revised 9/2017, showed: -Policy Statement: Professional Staffing; -The dining service department will employ sufficient staff to carry out the functions of food and nutrition services, taking into consideration the resident assessments, individual plans of care and the number, acuity and diagnosis of the resident population; Policy Statement: Dining and Food Preferences; -Individual dining, food, and beverage preferences are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-25 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY See Event ID 2CK112 Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were served hot foods at appropriate temperatures of at least 120 degrees Fahrenheit (F), and cold foods at no more than 41 degrees F upon serving. Seven residents were interviewed about food temperatures and all seven said hot foods were frequently too cold and/or cold foods/drinks were frequently too warm (Residents #4, #5, #6, #7 #8, #9 and #10). The census was 116. Review of the Dining Services Department Policy and Procedure Manual revised 9/2017, showed: -Food: Quality and Palatability: Policy Statement: Food will be prepared by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor and appearance. Food will be palatable, attractive and served at a safe and appetizing temperature; -Proper (safe and appetizing) temperature: Food should be at the appropriate temperature as determined by the type of food to ensure residents' satisfaction and minimizes the risk for scalds and burns; -Meal Distribution: Policy Statement:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-25 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY See Event ID 2CK112 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a menu identifying appealing options of similar nutritive value (an alternate meal) to residents who did not want the primary meal being served. Four of four residents interviewed said the facility did not have a system in place to advise them of the alternate meal option (Residents #9, #8, #5 and #7). This had the potential to affect all residents. The census was 116. Review of the Dining Services Department Policy and Procedure Manual revised 9/2017, showed: -Menu Policy Statement: Menus will be planned in advance to meet the nutritional needs of the residents/patients in accordance with established national guidelines. Menus will be developed to meet the criteria through the use of an approved menu planning guide; -Procedures: -Menu cycles will be developed and tailored to the needs and requirements of the facility; -Menus will be periodically presented for resident review, including Resident Council, menu review meetings…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-25 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY See Event ID 2CK112 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were currently diagnosed and treated with antibiotics for respiratory infection received ordered breathing treatments by nebulizer (a small machine that turns liquid medicine into a mist that can be easily inhaled) (Resident #7) and by inhaler (a small, handheld device that delivers medication directly to the lungs) (Resident #11). Staff did not access the emergency kit. The sample was 11. The census was 116. Review of the undated Physician Order Policy, showed: -Policy: to provide resident centered care that meets the psychosocial, physical and emotional needs and concerns of the residents. The safety of residents, staff and visitors is of primary importance. The policy is to provide guidance for licensed nurses and licensed therapist to accurately documented physician and provider orders as determined by the licensee's scope of practice; -Procedure: Execution of the order: The nurse that takes the physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-03-11 · tag F0569 — pattern
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure third party liability (TPL) forms were completed within 30 days for the final accounting for residents who expired. This affected nine of 11 residents reviewed, who expired and had money in their account (Residents #700, #701, #702, #703, #704, #705, #706, #707 and #708). The census was 181. 1. Review of Resident #700's resident fund account, showed the following: -He/she expired on [DATE]; -He/she had a balance of $1,676.26; -TPL completed [DATE]. 2. Review of Resident #701's resident fund account, showed the following: -He/she expired on [DATE]; -He/she had a balance of $46.03; -TPL completed [DATE]. 3. Review of Resident #702's resident fund account, showed the following: -He/she expired on [DATE]; -He/she had a balance of $1,537.16; -TPL completed [DATE]. 4. Review of Resident #703's resident fund account, showed the following: -He/she expired on [DATE]; -He/she had a balance of $544.86; -TPL completed [DATE]. 5. Review of Resident #704's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-03-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had complete, accurate and individualized care plans, to address specific needs of the residents, for seven of 38 sampled residents (Residents #156, #12, #71, #133, #64, #2 and #323). The census was 181. 1. Review of Resident #156's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated asessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 1/25/2021, showed: -admission date of 1/16/2021; -Cognitively intact; -Diagnosis included diabetes. Observations on 3/1/2021 at 10:00 A.M., 3/2/2021 at 8:20 A.M., and 3/3/2021 at 1:30 P.M., showed the resident had an insulin pump connected to his/her abdomen. During an interview on 3/1/2021 at 10:00 A.M., the resident said he/she had an insulin pump since 1998 and is able to manage it by him/herself. He/she has had an insulin pump since admission to the facility. Review of the resident's medical record, showed: -An order dated, 02/22/2021, resident may manage personal insulin pump.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-03-11 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided according to accepted standards of clinical practice by not administering medications per their medication administration policies for 15 residents (Residents #12, #25, #33, #35, #71, #73, #78, #83, #94, #98, #110, #126, #139, #156, and #322.) The facility failed to document the provision of restorative therapy services, correctly label tube feeding bottles, obtain orders for a hand splint, and/or follow physician's orders for two additional residents (Resident #2 and #323). The facility also failed to develop and implement an admissions procedure which included timely initial assessement, verification of orders and initiation of a baseline care plan. This affected one resident (Resident #800), who was admitted to the facility. The sample size was 38. The census was 181. 1. Review of Resident #12's February physician's order sheet (POS) showed: -Diagnoses included: chronic obstructive pulmonary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-03-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary services, care or assistance for dependent residents who were unable to perform activities of daily living (ADLs). The facility failed to ensure three residents received necessary services to maintain good nutrition (Residents #91, #93 and #121) and failed to maintain grooming and personal/oral hygiene for four sampled residents (Residents #31, #65, #147 and #326). The sample was 38. The census was 181. 1. Review of Resident #91's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 2/1/21, showed: -Diagnoses of dementia, Parkinson's disease and high blood pressure; -Short/long term memory loss; -Extensive staff assistance with bed mobility, dressing, eating and personal hygiene; -Total staff assistance for transfers; -Feeding tube; -Hospice care. Review of the resident's physician's order sheet (POS), dated 2/21, showed: -Regular mechanically altered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-03-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all open insulin pens/vials and inhalers had an open date written on it for four out of eight observed open insulin pens/vials and two of two observed open inhalers; failed to ensure all emergency swing kits (portable emergency medication kits provided by the pharmacy) and the medications inside of the emergency swing kits were not expired; and failed to ensure all medications and treatment supplies were not expired in three of four observed medication rooms. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents admitted to the facility. The sample size was 38. The census was 181. 1. Observation on 2/24/21 at 5:21 P.M., showed the Special Care Unit medication cart contained one open Symbicort inhalers (used to treat asthma) with no open date and one open Albuterol Sulfate Aerosol Powder Breath Activated 90 microgram (mcg) inhaler (used to treat asthma) with no open date. 2. Observation on 2/24/21 at 5:48 P.M., showed the Special Care Unit medication room contained the following: -Emergency…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-03-11 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide residents with a nourishing, well-balanced diet, taking into consideration each resident's preferences. The facility failed to respect each resident's right to make choices about his/her diet and be provided with acceptable alternative choices or substitutions for four sampled residents (Residents #61, #28, #133 and #86). The sample was 38. The facility census was 181. 1. Review of Resident #61's Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment completed by facility staff, dated 12/11/20, showed the following: -Cognitively intact; -Independent with with activities of daily living (ADLs, self care activities); -Diagnoses included depression, high blood pressure, muscle weakness; -Mobility device: None used. During an interview on 2/25/21 at 8:05 A.M., the resident said the facility does not put alternate meals/options on the daily menus. It is only posted at the Long Term Care (LTC) dining room. The facility stopped providing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-03-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store and prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food service by failing to ensure thawed foods were correctly dated to prevent the use of outdated food items, by failing to ensure utensils were not placed on contaminated surfaces in between use, ensure equipment was air dried, and ensure staff properly wore hair restraints to cover their hair while in the kitchen. In addition, the facility failed to ensure there was an air gap between the ice machine's drain and the floor drain, in one of two kitchens, to potentially prevent sewer water from backing up into the industrial ice maker. The census was 181. 1. Observation of the south kitchen on 2/18/21, showed: -At 11:25 A.M., on the exterior of the refrigerator, located behind the hand washing sink, a sign which read, open date, use by date, blank; -Inside the middle refrigerator, an egg crate filled with vanilla health shakes, undated. 2. Observation of the rehab kitchen on 2/23/21, showed dietary staff preparing lunch at 10:29 A.M. Dark crust was noted on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-03-11 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — pattern
    Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff completed routine inspection of bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails as part of a regular maintenance program to identify areas of possible entrapment for five residents (Residents #121, #326, #71, #108, #87) with side rails to reduce the risks of accidents. The facility identified 124 residents with side rails in use. The census was 181. 1. Review of Resident #121's quarterly Minimum Date Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by staff, dated 1/9/21, showed the following; -Rarely or never understood; -Long and short term memory problems; -Severely impaired cognitive skills; -Required extensive assistance of two or more persons for bed mobility, transfers, and eating; -Impairment on both sides of the upper and lower body; -Bed rails not used. Review of the resident's bed safety review, dated 1/29/21, showed staff documented the resident will have quarter-length side rails to both sides of the bed.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-03-11 · tag F0914 — pattern
    Provide bedrooms that don't allow residents to see each other when privacy is needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents had privacy curtains that provided full visual privacy for residents. This had the potential to affect 20 residents residing in 10 semi-private rooms on one of five halls/wings. The census was 181. During the initial facility tour on 2/18/21 at 11:43 A.M., resident rooms: 47, 48, 50, 52, 54, 56, 63, 65, 67 and 69, all semi-private rooms with all beds occupied, were observed to have one privacy curtain, approximately 8 feet long between each bed. The privacy curtains were attached to one tract on the ceiling that ended at the foot of the two beds. The tracts did not curve around either bed in the room to provide full privacy to either resident for their own personal use, or when staff provided personal care. During an interview on 3/2/21 at 7:04 A.M., the central supply clerk said he/she had worked at the facility for five years. He/she was helping out on the floor that day. The curtains in those 10 rooms had always been like that as far as he/she was aware. During an interview on 3/2/21 at 8:30 A.M., the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-03-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life when staff failed to honor a resident's request (Resident #68) for the removal of an indwelling catheter (a sterile tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) after expressing it was embarrassing to have and remained in place without a diagnosis, refused to provide a resident as needed (PRN) pain medication when requested (Resident #147), refused to assist a resident to the bathroom when requested (Resident #64), failed to provide assistance with grooming and dressing for a dependent resident who remained in soiled clothing (Resident #82) and remained on a personal cell phone while discussing a resident's protected health information (Resident #87). The sample was 38. The census was 181. 1. Review of Resident #68's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-03-11 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice, by failing to facilitate a resident's right to make choices about aspects of his/her life that are significant to the resident, when the facility staff opened a resident's package without the resident's permission (Resident #86). Staff also failed to honor a resident's choice to get out of bed, resulting in the resident remaining in bed all day (Resident #133). The sample size was 38. The census was 181. 1. Review of Resident #86's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 12/17/20, showed the following: -Cognitively intact; -Makes self understood and is able to understand others; -Independent with all activities of daily living (ADLs, self care activities); -Diagnoses included diabetes, anxiety, depression and difficulty walking. Review of the resident's care plan, last revised on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-03-11 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify a family member timely of a resident's fall and laboratory results, for one expanded sample resident (Resident #323). The census was 181. Review of Resident #323's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff dated 3/2/20, showed the following: -Brief Interview of Mental Status, (BIMS, a brief screen of cognitive status) score of 3 (severe cognitive impairment); -Delusions; -Diagnoses included atrial fibrillation (A-fib, an irregular, often rapid heart rate that commonly causes poor blood flow), heart failure, arthritis and dementia. Review of the resident's progress notes, dated 3/28/20, showed the following: -At 2:45 A.M., the nurse heard a bump, went to observe, and noticed the resident on his/her knees in front of the toilet. Range of motion was performed, skin assessment was performed and noted the resident to have a laceration across the bridge of his/her nose. The nurse called the physician, who ordered a stat x-ray of the resident's nose; -At 3:06 A.M.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-03-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide evidence that residents' personal possessions had been returned to the resident or resident representative upon discharge or death. The Inventory of Personal Effects forms of three discharged residents were reviewed and problems were found with all three. (Residents #575, #226 and #223). The census was 181. 1. Review of Resident #575's medical record, showed: -The resident was admitted to the facility [DATE]; -Diagnosis included: traumatic brain injury (brain dysfunction caused by an outside force, usually a violent blow to the head), atrial fibrillation (a-fib, irregular heart rhythm) dementia, repeated falls, and high blood pressure; -The resident expired on [DATE]. Review of the Resident's Inventory of Personal Effects, showed: -Items acquired after original entry, dated 7/20, an echo hub was listed; -The section labeled on discharge, for resident or resident representative to sign was blank. Review of the resident's progress notes, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-03-11 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure newly hired employees had complete criminal background checks and were screened to rule out the presence of a Federal Indicator with the Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) Registry for three of eleven employee files reviewed. Furthermore, the facility failed to have a policy to address routine reviews of the employee disqualification list (EDL, a listing maintained by the Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS) of individuals who have been determined to have abused or neglected a resident, patient, client, or consumer or misappropriated funds or property belonging to a resident, patient, client, or consumer) to ensure no current employees have been added to the EDL. The census was 181. According to the DHSS, Section for Long Term Care Long-Tern Care (LTC) Bulletin Volume 6, winter of 2008, showed providers are required to check the registry before hiring any individual and may not continue to employ a person whose name appears on the registry with a federal indicator. Providers must seek verification from all states…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-03-11 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy by thoroughly investigating a resident's allegation of physical abuse by a facility staff member and submit to the Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS) their investigation (Resident #424). This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The sample was 38. The census was 181. Review of the facility's Abuse, Neglect and Misappropriation Policy, dated 10/14/14, revised on 10/12/18 and 3/21/19, showed: -Abuse: The willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish. Abuse also includes the deprivation by an individual, including a caretaker, or good or services that are necessary to attain or maintain physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. Unauthorized disclosure of resident photographs or images could be mental, physical or sexual abuse, depending on how the images were used; -Physical abuse: Includes hitting, slapping, pinch, kick or flicking with fingers or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-03-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident of 38 sampled residents was monitored and interventions were implemented to ensure his/her safety, and the safety of other residents in the facility, related to the resident's illicit drug use in the facility (Resident #71). This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents admitted to the facility. The census was 181. 1. Review of Resident #71's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff, dated 12/12/20, showed: -admission date of 9/4/20; -Mild cognitive impairment; -No behaviors affecting self or others; -Diagnoses included anxiety disorder, bipolar disease and schizophrenia (a serious mental illness that affects how a person thinks, feels, and behaves). Review of the resident's care plan, dated 10/6/20, showed the facility identified the resident's risk for falls, risk for nutritional problems, and use of antipsychotic and antianxiety…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-03-11 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff had training and maintained appropriate competencies and skill sets to provide oversight and care of one resident admitted with an insulin pump (Resident #156). The sample was 38. The census was 181. Review of Resident #156's medical record, showed: -admission date of 1/16/21; -Diagnosis included diabetes; -An order dated, 2/22/21; resident may manage personal insulin pump. Observations showed the resident had an insulin pump secured to the left side of his/her abdomen at various times during the survey on 3/1 through 3/3/21. During an interview on 3/1/21 at 10:00 A.M., the resident said he/she has had an insulin pump since 1998. He/she is able to fill the insulin cartridge, change the insulin pump tubing and manage the settings of the pump without difficulty. He/she has been asked multiple times during his/her stay at the facility by nursing staff as to what the insulin pump was and if the insulin pump was a pager or beeper. The resident is worried if the facility staff would be able to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-03-11 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to administer medications with a less than five percent medication error rate. Out of 31 opportunities for error, two errors occurred, resulting in a 6.45% medication error rate (Resident #166). The facility census was 181. 1. Review of Resident #166's admission Minimum Date Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by staff, dated 1/18/21, showed the following: -Alert and oriented and able to make decisions; -Diagnoses included atrial fibrillation (an irregular, often rapid heart rate that commonly causes poor blood flow), heart failure (chronic condition in which heart does not pump blood as well as it should) and septicemia (a life-threatening complication of an infection). Review of the resident's physician orders (POS), dated 2/22/21, showed the following: -An order dated 1/9/21 for Metoprolol Succinate (medication used to treat high blood pressure, chest pain and heart failure); Extended Release 24 Hour 100 milligrams (mg); Give one tablet by mouth every 12 hours for high blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-03-11 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to prevent gnats in one resident's room on the South hall (Residents #83), throughout the facility's South hall and near the South hall nurse's station, where staff provided feeding assistance to one resident (Resident #121) and one resident's room on the North hall (Resident #139). The sample was 38. The census was 181. 1. Review of Resident #83's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 12/17/20, showed: -admitted on [DATE]; -Cognitively intact; -Diagnoses included anxiety and depression. Observations on 2/19/21 at 12:35 P.M. and on 2/23/21 at 1:25 P.M., showed several gnats flying throughout the resident's room, on the South hall. No odors were present in the room. During an interview on 2/23/21 at 1:25 P.M., the resident said he/she spends most of his/her time in bed in his/her room, and the gnats are always there. He/she has never seen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2021-03-11 · tag F0575 — widespread
    Post a list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the state abuse/neglect hotline phone number and the Medicare/Medicaid contact information was posted in a prominent location for residents, visitors and staff. The sample was 38. The census was 181. 1. Observations of the halls in the rehabilitation building, the north and south halls in the long-term care building, and resident common areas in both buildings, on all days of the survey from 2/18-19, 2/22 through 2/26, and 2/28 through 3/3/21, showed no posted information for the state abuse/neglect hotline or Medicare/Medicaid contact information. 2. During the Resident Council interview on 2/23/21 at 8:19 A.M., three out of three residents said they did not know where the state abuse/neglect hotline or Medicare/Medicaid contact information was posted. 3. During an interview on 3/3/21 at 2:15 P.M., the administrator said the abuse/neglect hotline phone number and the Medicare/Medicaid contact information was posted at the front entrance for Long Term Care. Two weeks ago, a resident tore down the signage. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$234,836 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $234,836 — penalty dated 2024-06-18
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-08-14 for 99 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to OPCO SKILLED MANAGEMENT — 66 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.3-1.3 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.2-1.2 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.7-0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 54.3-1.3 vs chain
The other 65 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
1 of 5Brentwood Place ThreeDallas, TX 1 of 5Broadway Nursing & RehabilitationSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5Cameron Nursing CenterCameron, MO 1 of 5Carmel Hills Wellness & RehabilitationIndependence, MO 1 of 5Casa Arena Healthcare LLCAlamogordo, NM 1 of 5Casa Maria HealthcareRoswell, NM 1 of 5Forest Park Nursing & RehabilitationDallas, TX 1 of 5Fort Worth Wellness & RehabilitationFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Glenview Wellness & RehabilitationNorth Richland Hills, TX 1 of 5Highland Pines Nursing HomeLongview, TX 1 of 5Ivy Creek Wellness & RehabilitationWaco, TX 1 of 5Las Cruces Village Nursing & Rehabilitation LLCLas Cruces, NM 1 of 5Magnolia Wellness CenterSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Maple Grove Wellness & RehabilitationFenton, MO 1 of 5Mineola Gardens Wellness & RehabilitationMineola, TX 1 of 5Pine Grove ManorSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Rehab Of Kansas City SouthKansas City, MO 1 of 5The Hillcrest Of North DallasDallas, TX 1 of 5West Side Campus Of CareWhite Settlement, TX 1 of 5Willow Ridge Wellness & RehabilitationFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Willowcreek Wellness & RehabilitationFlorissant, MO 2 of 5Arbor Lake Nursing & Rehabilitation, LLCFort Worth, TX 2 of 5Aztec HealthcareAztec, NM 2 of 5Betty Dare Wellness & Rehabilitation LLCAlamogordo, NM 2 of 5Blue Springs Wellness & RehabilitationBlue Springs, MO 2 of 5Cypress Springs Wellness & RehabilitationMount Vernon, TX 2 of 5Fiesta Park Wellness & RehabilitationAlbuquerque, NM 2 of 5Hilltop At Blue River, TheKansas City, MO 2 of 5La Vida Buena HealthcareLas Vegas, NM 2 of 5Los Alamos Wellness & RehabilitationLos Alamos, NM 2 of 5McGregor Wellness & RehabilitationMc Gregor, TX 2 of 5Monarch Springs Wellness & RehabilitationUniversity City, MO 2 of 5Northrise Wellness & RehabilitationLas Cruces, NM 2 of 5Prescott Valley Nursing & RehabilitationPrescott Valley, AZ 2 of 5Prescott Village Nursing & RehabilitationPrescott, AZ 2 of 5Rehabilitation Center Of Independence, TheIndependence, MO 2 of 5San Antonio Wellness & RehabilitationSan Antonio, TX 2 of 5Skyline Nursing CenterDallas, TX 2 of 5Sunny Springs Nursing & RehabSulphur Springs, TX 2 of 5White Acres Wellness & RehabilitationEl Paso, TX

Showing 40 of 65; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
WILDFLOWER HEALTHCARE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 07/30/2024
BLOOMING WILLOW PARTNERS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/30/2024
DERHOBEN TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/30/2024
PAS B SOL TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/30/2024
DAVIDOVICH, NIVIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/30/2024
STERNSHEIN, JENNIFERIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/30/2024
GARETZ, DAVIDIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/30/2024
9350 GREEN PARK ROAD MO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/30/2024
BROOK PARTNERS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/30/2024
KNOBEL REALTY TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/30/2024
LINZ TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/30/2024
REMBRANDT REALTY TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/30/2024
SESAME REALTY TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/30/2024
WILLOWBROOK INVESTORS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/30/2024
HAGINS, ELIZABETHIndividual5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTERESTsince 07/30/2024
KAPLAN, MORDECHAIIndividual5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTERESTsince 07/30/2024
MINDLE, ADAMIndividual5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTERESTsince 07/30/2024
ZIMMERMAN, CAROLINEIndividual5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTERESTsince 07/30/2024
AMIN, IQBALIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/30/2024
LUTZ, HAROLDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/30/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 31 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

11 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$11.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-25.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.9M
Related-party expense13% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 88%Medicare 2%Other / private 10%

About 88% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$314per resident / day
operating cost
$9,543per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$250per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Missouri
$6,741/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,400/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265703. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next