No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Sunny Springs Nursing & Rehab

1200 Jackson St North, Sulphur Springs, TX 75482 · Government - Hospital district · 95 certified beds · (903) 885-6571 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jan 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)2 immediate-jeopardy citations
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jan 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (57) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1216 Church St · (903) 885-2820 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
411 Main St · (877) 438-0770 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
300 Connally St · (903) 575-8191 · Call to confirm hours
Park
125 Davis St S · (206) 684-4075 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased16.0%15.8%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.6%3.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.8%0.8%2.0%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%2.4%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.3%3.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened9.6%14.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication16.3%18.0%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.3%3.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control8.0%13.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table11.6%9.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine93.3%88.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission23.2%25.7%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit26.9%12.3%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.422.171.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.292.061.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

44.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 35 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

44.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
68.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.27U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.11hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 68.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 25 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 39% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF44.0%CMS range 31.2–57.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.7%CMS range 7.3–17.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge68.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge72.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge60.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified79.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay2.6%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.3%CMS range 4.3–14.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.871.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.67
RN hours/ resident / day
0.48
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.21
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.36
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.55
RN hoursweekends
44.9%
Total nursing turnover
36.4%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 95 beds and averages 67.6 residents a day — about 71% occupied, or roughly 27 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.36 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.67 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.21 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.08 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.47 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.72 to 0.55 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

15
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-09-10)
15
at the previous standard inspection (2024-08-22)

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

57 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 45 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-07-14 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to immediately consult the physician when there was a significant change in the resident's physical and mental status (that is, a deterioration in health, mental, or psychosocial status in either life-threatening conditions or clinical complications) for 1 of 13 residents (Resident #4) whose records were reviewed for change in condition. 1. The facility failed to notify Resident #4's physician when Resident #4 had an increase in bruising while taking an anticoagulant medication (blood thinner that works by preventing red blood cells from forming clots), which indicated a change of condition and resulted in a delay of treatment. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was identified on 07/13/23 at 9:30 AM. While the IJ was removed on 07/14/23 at 11:56 AM, the facility remained out of compliance at no actual harm with a potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy with a scope identified as isolated due to the facility's need to complete…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2023-07-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 13 (Resident #4) residents reviewed for quality of care. 1. The facility failed to intervene when Resident #4, who was taking an anticoagulant medication (blood thinner that works by preventing red blood cells from forming clots), had increased bruising, which indicated a change of condition. 2. The facility did not ensure LVN L, who was the treatment nurse, accurately performed weekly skin assessments. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was identified on 07/13/23 at 9:30 AM. While the IJ was removed on 07/14/23 at 11:56 AM, the facility remained out of compliance at no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy with a scope identified as isolated due to the facility's need to complete in-service training and evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems. These failures could…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure all drugs were stored in a locked compartment, only accessible by authorized personnel, and labeled and dated correctly for 1 of 5 medication carts (100-200 halls nurse's cart) and 3 of 8 residents (Residents #21, #11, and #39) reviewed for pharmacy services. 1. The facility failed to ensure RN D secured the 100-200 hall nurse's cart when she left it unattended on 09/09/25. 2. The facility failed to ensure RN D properly secured Resident #21's insulin pen when she left it on top of the 100-200 hall nurse's cart on 09/09/25. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #11 did not have wound cleanser in his bedside drawer. 4. Medication aide failed to ensure Resident #39 took her morning medications prior leaving her room and not leaving the medications behind on 09/10/25. These failures could place residents at risk for not receiving drugs and biologicals as needed and a drug diversion. Findings include: 1. During an observation and interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-09-10 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide food that was palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature for 1 of 23 (Resident #11) residents and 1 of 3 meals (lunch) reviewed for palatability. The facility failed to provide palatable food served at an appetizing temperature or taste to Resident #11, who complained the food was cold and not good. The dietary staff failed to provide food that was palatable for the lunch meal observed on 09/10/25. Findings included: Record review of Resident #11's face sheet dated 09/10/25 indicated he was a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of legal blindness, high blood pressure, malignant neoplasm of the prostate (prostate cancer), and depression. Record review of Resident #11's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] indicated he usually understood others and usually made himself understood. The MDS also indicated he had a BIMS score of 15 which meant he was cognitively intact. The MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-09-10 · tag F0847 — pattern
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure the arbitration agreement was explained in a form and manner, including a language the resident or representative understood for 3 of 3 residents (Residents #56, #57, and #70) reviewed for arbitration agreements. The facility failed to ensure the binding arbitration agreement was fully understood and explained to Residents #57, #70, and #56's responsible party, prior to signing it as part of the admission packet. These failures could place the residents or the residents' responsible parties in binding agreements not fully understood, have a loss of their legal rights, and cause negative psychological issues. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #57's face sheet, dated 09/10/25, reflected Resident #57 was an [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included cerebral infarction (stroke). Record review of Resident #57's admission MDS assessment, dated 09/02/25, reflected Resident #57 usually made…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-10 · tag F0849 — pattern
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to collaborate with hospice representatives and coordinate the hospice care planning process for each resident receiving hospice services, to ensure the quality of care for the resident, ensuring communication with the hospice medical director, the resident's attending physician, and others participating in the provision of care for 3 of 7 residents (Resident #8, Resident 11 and Resident #66) reviewed for hospice services. 1. The facility failed to maintain the hospice binder for Resident #8, which contained information related to the hospice services provided to the resident, including the most recent plan of care, hospice election form, medication list, and physician recertification. 2. The facility failed to obtain Resident #11's hospice election form, IDG meetings, most recent medication profile, and the most recent plan of care for his hospice book 3. The facility did not ensure Resident #12's hospice records were a part of their records in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 3 of 26 residents (Resident #66, Resident #11, and Resident #18), reviewed for infection control practices. 1. The facility failed to ensure CNA O did not wear her gown and gloves out of Resident #66's room after providing direct care to Resident #66 who was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP- an infection control strategy that uses gloves/gowns during high-contact resident care to reduce the spread of multidrug-resistant organisms) on 4/11/25.2. The facility failed to ensure CNA O did not pick up linens off Resident #66's floor, placed in a bag, and then proceeded to provide direct care to Resident #66 without changing her gloves on 4/11/25.3. The facility failed to ensure CNA S did not pick up a plastic bag…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident had the right to be informed in advance, by the physician or other practitioner or professional, of the risks and benefits of proposed care, of treatment and treatment alternatives or treatment options and to choose the alternative or option he or she prefers. for 1 of 21 (Residents #60) residents reviewed for psychoactive medications. The facility failed to ensure Resident #60 had signed a psychotropic consent for Remeron (antidepressant medication). This failure could place residents at risk for receiving unnecessary antipsychotic medications without informed consent.Findings included: Record review of Resident #60's face sheet, dated 09/10/25, indicated a [AGE] year-old male who was his own responsible party was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses which included dementia (a group of conditions that cause a decline in cognitive abilities, such as memory, language, attention, and problem-solving, severe enough to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-10 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the right to formulate an advanced directive was provided for 1 of 26 residents (Residents #13) reviewed for advanced directives. The facility did not ensure Resident #13 had a physician's order in his chart for DNR. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving care and services to meet their needs. Findings included: Record review of Resident #13's face sheet, dated [DATE], reflected Resident #13 was a [AGE] year-old male, readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (absence of enough oxygen in the tissues to sustain bodily functions). Record review of Resident #13's admission MDS assessment, dated [DATE], reflected Resident #13 usually made himself understood, and usually understood others. Resident #13's BIMS score was 12, which reflected his cognition was moderately impaired. Record review of Resident #13's undated comprehensive care plan, reflected…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs, for 1 of 26 (Resident 32) residents reviewed for comprehensive person-centered care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #32's comprehensive care plan addressed she received an IV antibiotic via her central line. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk of not receiving appropriate interventions to meet their current needs.Findings included: Record review of Resident #32's face sheet dated 09/10/25, indicated a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included partial intestinal obstruction (bowel obstruction), diabetes type 2 (a group of diseases that result in too much sugar in the blood), and atrial fibrillation (irregular heart rhythm). Record review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to conduct activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain grooming, personal, and oral hygiene were provided for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for ADL care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was showered or bed bathed during the dates of 09/01/25 through 09/10/25. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving care/services, decreased quality of life, and loss of dignity. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 09/10/25, indicated a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included obesity, depression (sadness), diabetes, and Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, also known as COPD (a group of lung diseases that cause airflow obstruction and breathing problems). Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 08/20/25, indicated Resident #1 understood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-10 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received proper treatment and assistive devices to maintain vision and hearing abilities, the facility must, if necessary, assist the resident in making appointments for 1 of 26 residents (Resident #51). The facility failed to ensure Resident #11 had his ketorolac eye drops by 08/31/25 to ensure he had his surgery on 09/02/25. This failure placed resident at risk of a delay in treatments for the residents' conditions. Findings included: Record review of Resident #51's face sheet dated 09/10/25 indicated he was a[AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of legal blindness, unspecified cataract, need for assistance with personal care, Parkinsonism (clinical syndrome characterized by tremor, slow heart rates, and postural instability), and heart failure. Record review of Resident #51's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated he was able to make himself understood and able to understand…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 45 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents environment remained free of accident hazards for 1 of 26 residents (Residents #11) reviewed for accident hazards. The facility failed to ensure a safe environment to prevent accidents and hazards for Residents #11 by not ensuring 3 razors (1 razor that did not have a cover over the blades and 2 razors in the open package) in his drawer were stored securely. This failure could place residents at risk for injuries. Findings included: Record review of Resident #11's face sheet dated 09/10/25 indicated he was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses legal blindness, high blood pressure, malignant neoplasm of the prostate (prostate cancer), and depression. Record review of Resident #11's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated he usually understood others and usually made himself understood. The MDS also indicated he had a BIMS score of 15 which meant he was cognitively…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-10 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight or desirable body weight range and electrolyte balance, unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrates that this is not possible or resident preferences indicate otherwise for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for nutritional status (Resident #12). The facility failed to ensure Resident #12's enteral feeding (a form of nutrition that is delivered into the digestive system as a liquid form via the feeding tube) was administered as ordered by the physician on 09/08/25. This failure could place residents at risk for malnourishment, illness, skin breakdown, and decreased quality of life.Findings included: Record review of Resident #12's face sheet dated 09/10/25, indicated a [AGE] year-old male who readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and gastrostomy status (surgical opening in stomach to provide nutrition and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 had a physician's order for oxygen. This failure could place residents who receive respiratory care at risk of developing respiratory complications and a decreased quality of care.Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 09/10/25, indicated a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included shortness of breath also known as SOB, (feeling of difficulty breathing or not being able to get enough air), obesity, depression (sadness), diabetes, and Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, also known as COPD (a group of lung diseases…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of 1 of 6 residents (Resident #42) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure Resident #42 did not have duplicate orders for his potassium. This failure could place the residents at risk of not receiving the intended therapeutic benefits of prescribed medications.Findings included: Record review of Resident #42's face sheet dated 09/10/25, indicated a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia (memory loss) and hypertension (high blood pressure). Record review of Resident #42's annual MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated he was usually understood and usually understood others. Resident #42 had a BIMS score of 15, which indicated his cognition was intact. Record review of Resident #42's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-10 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide food and drink that accommodated the residents' preferences for 1 of 23 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for preferences. The facility did not honor Resident #1's preference for two milks with her breakfast on 09/09/25 and 09/10/25. This failure could result in a decrease in resident choices. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 09/10/25, indicated a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included shortness of breath also known as SOB, (feeling of difficulty breathing or not being able to get enough air), obesity, depression (sadness), diabetes, and Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, also known as COPD (a group of lung diseases that cause airflow obstruction and breathing problems. Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 08/20/25, indicated Resident #1 understood and was understood by others. Her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement written policies and procedures that prohibit mistreatment, neglect, and abuse of residents and establish policies and procedures to report and investigate such allegations, for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for abuse. The facility did not implement the policy on investigating an injury of unknown origin to the state agency for Resident #3 when Resident # 3 was found with bruising and a skin tear on 02/11/2025 on the left arm. This failure could place the residents at increased risk of abuse and neglect. Findings included: Record review of Resident #3's face sheet, dated 04/09/25, indicated an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia (diseases that affect memory, thinking, and the ability to perform daily activities), diabetes (is a chronic condition that happens when you have persistently high blood sugar levels), and depression…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, were reported immediately, but no later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility staff did not report to the state agency that Resident #3 had a bruise and a skin tear to the left arm of unknown origin on 02/11/25. This failure could place the residents at increased risk for abuse and neglect or further potential abuse due to unreported allegations of abuse and neglect. Findings included: Record review of Resident #3's face sheet, dated 04/09/25, indicated an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia (diseases that affect memory, thinking, and the ability to perform daily activities), diabetes (is a chronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs, for 2 of 4 (Resident #1 and Resident #2) residents reviewed for the care plan. 1. The facility failed to ensure urinalysis results on 04/05/2025 for Resident #1's contact isolation was care planned on 04/06/2025 for a diagnosis of Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase, also known as ESBL (a bacteria that can be spread from person to person on contaminated hands of both patients and healthcare workers. 2. The facility failed on 04/03/2025 to ensure Resident #2's contact isolation was care planned for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus also known as MRSA (an infection caused by a type of staph bacteria that's become resistant to many of the antibiotics used to treat ordinary staph infections) and for her refusal to stay in her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 6 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure LVN D wore the proper PPE (gown and gloves) while checking Resident #1's blood sugar or administering insulin on 04/08/25, who was positive for ESBL. The facility failed to ensure CNA E wore the proper PPE (gown and gloves) while providing care to Resident #1, who was positive for ESBL on 04/09/25. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 understood contact isolation precautions when the resident was in activities with other residents and positive for MRSA on 04/08/25. These failures could place residents and staff at risk for cross-contamination and spread of infection and could potentially affect all others in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-28 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 3 of 13 residents (Resident #1, #2 and Resident #3) reviewed for resident abuse. 1. The facility did not ensure Resident #1 was free from abuse when Resident #3 struck Resident #1 on the shoulder 11/8/24. 2. The facility did not ensure Resident #2 was free from abuse when Resident #4 reached out and grabbed Resident #2 under the arm on 12/9/24. 3. The facility did not ensure Resident #3 was free from abuse when Resident #5 pushed Resident #3 head on 12/9/24. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The past noncompliance began on 11/8/24 and ended on 12/14/24. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. These failures could place residents at risk of abuse, physical harm, mental anguish, and emotional distress. Findings included: 1. Resident #1 Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 11/12/24, reflected Resident #1 was an [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-28 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assure the accurate dispensing and administering of all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 3 residents (Residents #7) reviewed for pharmacy services. 1. The facility did not ensure Resident #7 medications were administered during the scheduled time. 2. The facility did not ensure Resident #7 was given Estrace Vaginal Cream 0.01 mg/gm as scheduled. 3. The facility did not ensure Resident #7 was given Vitamin B-12 2000 mcg. These failures could place the residents at risk of not having medications available for use, drug diversion, not receiving their medications as ordered, and exacerbation of their disease processes. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #7's face sheet, dated 01/28/25, reflected Resident #7 was a [AGE] year-old female, originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia (loss of memory,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-22 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 2 (Resident #64, and Resident #78) of 24 residents reviewed for accuracy of MDS assessments. 1) The facility failed to ensure that Resident #64's MDS accurately reflected the resident had received antibiotics during the 7-day look back period. 2) The facility failed to ensure that Resident's #64's MDS accurately reflected the resident had a MRSA infection to his right hip. 3) The facility failed to ensure Resident #78's MDS accurately reflected his discharge from the facility. These failures could put residents at risk of not receiving the necessary care and services related to inaccurate MDS assessment. Findings included: 1) Record review of Resident #64's face sheet dated 08/20/24 indicated he was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of depression (common but serious mood disorder causing sadness), centrilobular emphysema (a form of lung…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-22 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing program of activities based on the comprehensive assessment to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident for 2 (08/21/24 and 08/22/24) of 2 days reviewed for quality of life. The facility failed to ensure 4 of 8 scheduled activities were provided according to the August 2024 activity schedule on 08/21/2024 and 08/22/2024. This failure could place residents at risk for not having activities to meet their interests or needs and a decline in their physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings included: Record review of the Activity Calendar dated August 2024 indicated the following: Wednesday 08/21/2024: 09:30 AM balloon tennis; 10:30 AM Left-Right-Center game; 2:30 PM bean bag toss; 03:30 PM Help Your Neighbor Thursday 08/22/2024: 09:30 AM ball toss; 10:30 AM Left-Right-Center game; 02:30 PM Dominoes; 03:30 PM Skip Bo. During an observation on 08/21/2024 at 02:35 PM, the bean bag toss activity was not happening in the dining…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be informed of and participate in his or her treatment which included, the right to be informed in advance, by the physician or other practitioner or other professional, of the risks and benefits of proposed care, treatment, and treatment alternatives or treatment options to choose the alternative or option he or she preferred for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #179) reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to obtain informed consent based on the information of the benefits and risks for Resident #179 before administering Bupropion HCL ER (Wellbutrin - a medication used to treat depression). This failure could place residents at risk of receiving medications they had not consented to, experiencing potential adverse reactions, and a potential decline in physical and mental health status. Findings included: Record review of Resident #179's face sheet, dated 08/22/24, indicated a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to consult with the resident's physician immediately when there was a need to alter treatment significantly (that is, a need to discontinue an existing form of treatment due to adverse consequences, or to commence a new form of treatment) for 1 of 24 residents (Resident #33) reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to notify Resident #33's physician when he refused his ordered lab draws for 4 weeks. This failure placed residents' physician at risk of not being aware of any changes in their conditions and could result in a delay in treatment and decline in residents' health and well-being. Findings included: Record review of Resident #33's face sheet dated [DATE], indicated a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #33 had diagnoses of end stage renal disease (when the kidneys no longer adequately filter waste products from the blood and function less than 15 percent of normal levels), diabetes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had a right to personal privacy and confidentiality of medical records for 1 (Resident #57) of 4 residents reviewed for resident rights The facility failed to ensure the ADON logged out of her computer and protected the privacy of Resident #57's Medication Administration Record. This failure could place residents at risk for low self-esteem, loss of dignity and decreased quality of life due to medication administration record being accessible to others. Findings included: Record review of Resident #57's face sheet, dated 08/22/24, indicated a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included stroke, diabetes, and high blood pressure. Record review of Resident #57's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 06/13/24, indicated Resident #57 understood and was understood by others. Resident #57's BIMS score was 10, which meant she was moderately cognitively…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures that prohibit mistreatment, neglect, and abuse of residents, for 1 of 24 residents (Resident #10) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to follow their policy to report neglect to HHSC when Resident #10's Family Member alleged that CNA C left Resident #10 in bed beyond soiled, and shaking and CNA C stated, I don't fool with her because she hits me. This failure could place residents at risk of abuse, neglect, physical harm, mental anguish, and emotional distress. Findings included: Record review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse Prevention and Prohibition Program revised October 24, 2022, indicated: Policy Each resident has the right to be free from mistreatment, neglect, abuse, involuntary seclusion, and misappropriation of property .IX. Reporting/Response .D. The facility will report allegations of abusee, neglect, injuries of unknown source, misappropriation of resident property .i. Immediately or no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the events that caused the allegation involved abuse or resulted in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that caused the allegation did not involve abuse and did not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency and adult protective services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities) in accordance with state law through established procedures for 1 of 24 residents (Residents # 10) reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility failed to report the allegation of neglect for Resident #10 to the State Agency within required reporting timeframes, within 24 hours of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 24 residents (Residents #64) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to develop a care plan for Resident #64's diagnosis of MRSA (methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus) infection to the wound on his right hip. This failure could have placed resident at risk for not having their needs met. The findings included: Record review of Resident #64's face sheet dated 08/20/24 indicated he was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of depression (common but serious mood disorder causing sadness), centrilobular emphysema (a form of lung disease in people who smoke that affects the upper lungs), anxiety (a feeling of nervous, restless, or tense),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents requiring respiratory care were provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 oxygen cylinders reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure an oxygen cylinder was stored properly. This failure could place residents and staff at risk for accidents, leaks, and damage to the cylinder. The findings included: During an observation on 08/21/24 at 4:00 p.m. revealed an unsecured oxygen cylinder at the nurse's station. During an observation and interview on 08/21/24 at 4:21 p.m., revealed LVN B looked at the oxygen cylinder unsecured at the nurses' station. LVN B said she was unaware that the oxygen cylinder was at the nurse's station. She said it was one of the residents who went out to smoke. She said the oxygen cylinders should always be secured. During an interview on 08/21/24 at 5:25 p.m., the Activity Director said she was the person who set the oxygen cylinder at the nurses' station. She said she was aware that the oxygen cylinder…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure dialysis services were provided consistently with professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #33) reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #33 had a physician's order for dialysis treatment. The facility failed to monitor Resident #33's dialysis catheter. These failures could place the residents, who received dialysis, at risk for complications and not receiving proper care and treatment to meet their needs. Findings included: Record review of Resident #33's face sheet dated 08/21/24, indicated a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #33 had diagnoses of end stage renal disease (when the kidneys no longer adequately filter waste products from the blood, function less than 15 percent of normal levels), diabetes mellitus type 2 (a group of diseases that affect how the body uses blood sugar), dependence on renal dialysis (process of removing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary psychotropic drugs (without adequate behavior monitoring or side effects) for 1 (Resident #179) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary meds. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #179 had behavior monitoring for Bupropion HCL ER(Wellbutrin) and Sertraline (Zoloft) used for depression. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #179 had side effect monitoring for Clonazepam (Klonopin) used for anxiety. These failures could place residents at risk of possible medication side effects, adverse consequences, decreased quality of life, and dependence on unnecessary medications. Findings included: Record review of Resident #179's face sheet, dated 08/22/24, indicated a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses which included Spinal stenosis (pain in the lower back, that can cause cramping in one or both legs), Schizophrenia (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure all drugs were only accessible by authorized personnel for 1 of 4 medication carts (hall 100). The facility did not ensure the 100 hall medication cart was secured and unable to be accessed by unauthorized personnel. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving drugs and biologicals as needed and a drug diversion. Findings included: During an observation and interview on 08/20/24 at 12:10 p.m., the 100-hall medication cart was left unlocked, and staff, residents, and visitors were observed walking by the unlocked medication cart. The ADON exited a resident's room and said she was responsible for leaving the cart unlocked. She said she was in a hurry and forgot to lock her cart. The ADON said it was her responsibility to lock the cart when unattended. The ADON said by leaving the cart unlocked and unattended, anyone could open the cart and take medications. During an interview on 08/22/24 at 12:15 p.m., LVN B said the medication cart should never be left open when unattended. She said the medication cart…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to collaborate with hospice representatives and coordinate the hospice care planning process for each resident receiving hospice services, to ensure quality of care for the resident, ensuring communication with the hospice medical director, the resident's attending physician, and others participating in the provision of care for 3 of 4 residents (Residents #38, #31 and #8) reviewed for hospice services. The facility failed to obtain Resident #38's most recent plan of care, hospice election form, physician certification, and hospice medication list. The facility failed to obtain Resident #31's most recent updated hospice plan of care and hospice medication list. The facility failed to ensure Resident #8's hospice medication orders reflected what Resident #8 was currently receiving at the facility. These deficient practices could place residents who receive hospice services at-risk of receiving inadequate end-of-life care due to a lack of documentation,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 (Resident #64) of 24 residents reviewed for infection control practices and transmission-based precautions. 1) The facility failed to ensure Resident #64 was placed on (TBP) transmission-based isolation for MRSA infection to his right hip wound. 2) The facility failed to ensure CNAs received proper notification about the infection. These failures could place residents at increased risk for serious complications from a communicable disease that could diminish the resident's quality of life. Findings included: 1) Record review of Resident #64's face sheet dated 08/20/24 indicated he was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of depression (common but serious mood disorder causing sadness),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — isolated
    Have policies on smoking.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their own established smoking policy for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #9) reviewed for smoking. The facility failed to follow the policy on smoking by not completing a smoking screen assessment quarterly on Resident #9. This failure could place residents at risk of unsafe smoking and injury. Findings included: Record review of Resident #9's face sheet, dated 8/22/24 indicated Resident #9 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included stroke and high blood pressure. Record review of Resident #9's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 07/04/24, indicated Resident #9 was usually understood and usually understood by others. Resident #9's BIMs score was 15, which indicated he was cognitively intact. Resident #9 required limited assistance with bathing and set-up assistance with toileting, personal hygiene, transfer, eating, and bed mobility. Record review of Resident #9's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-15 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals, to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 16 residents reviewed for pharmacy services. (Resident #1) The facility failed to ensure RN F, CMA G, and LVN C were able to account for the missing 30 count card of Resident #1's Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen 7.5-325mg tablet used for pain management. This failure could place residents at risk for decreased quality of life, misappropriation of property, misappropriation of physician ordered medications and dignity. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 07/11/24 indicated she was an [AGE] year-old female who originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a progressive lung disease characterized by long-term respiratory symptoms and airflow…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-15 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to collaborate with hospice representatives and coordinate the hospice care planning process for each resident receiving hospice services, to ensure quality of care for the resident, ensuring communication with the hospice medical director, the resident's attending physician, and others participating in the provision of care for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #9) reviewed for hospice services. The facility failed to ensure Hospice Aide A performed a proper transfer when she failed to use a mechanical lift, as ordered by the physician and per Resident #9's care plan, to transfer Resident #9 from her wheelchair to her bed on 07/15/2024. This failure could place residents at risk for falls, injuries, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 07/11/2024 indicated, Resident #9 was a [AGE] year-old female initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #2) reviewed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to ensure CNA D performed hand hygiene when she changed gloves while providing perineal care for Resident #2. This failure could place residents and staff at risk for cross contamination and the spread of infection. Findings included: 1.Record review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 07/11/24 indicated she was a [AGE] year-old female who re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses dementia(a syndrome characterized by a general decline in cognitive abilities that affects a person's ability to perform daily tasks), high blood pressure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a progressive lung disease characterized by long-term…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for comprehensive person-centered care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 and Resident #2's restorative care program was included in their comprehensive care plans. These failures could place the residents at risk of not having their individual needs met, not receiving necessary services, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included: 1. Record review of a face sheet dated 06/17/2024 indicated Resident #1 was an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included muscle weakness, unsteadiness on feet, reduced mobility, and difficulty walking. Record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-17 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide residents with limited range of motion appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion and to prevent further decrease in range of motion for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for range of motion. The facility failed to ensure CNA A provided restorative care to Resident #1 and Resident #2 according to their Nursing Restorative Care Program plan of care. These failures could place residents at risk of not attaining/or maintaining their highest level of physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings included: 1. Record review of a face sheet dated 06/17/2024 indicated Resident #1 was an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included muscle weakness, unsteadiness on feet, reduced mobility, and difficulty walking. Record review of the Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #1 was usually able to make herself understood and usually understood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 3 residents (Residents #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for infection control practices in that: CNA B did not ensure Resident #1 was cleansed of stool when she (CNA B) performed incontinent care. CNA C did not ensure Resident #2 was cleansed of stool when she (CNA C) performed incontinent care. CNA C did not remove her dirty gloves, perform hand hygiene (wash her hands or use hand sanitizer) and place clean gloves on before grabbing Resident #2's draw sheet during incontinent care. These failures could place residents at risk for cross contamination and infections. Findings included: 1.Record review of the face sheet dated 10/31/23 indicated Resident #1 was [AGE] years old, readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained free of accident and hazards for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accident hazards in that: CNA D did not ensure Resident #1's bed was locked after providing care. This failure could place dependent residents at risk for falls, injuries and decreased quality of life. Findings included: 1.Record review of the face sheet dated 10/31/23 indicated Resident #1 was [AGE] years old, readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including, arteriovenous malformation of digestive system vessel ( a tangle of blood vessels that irregularly connects arteries and veins) vascular dementia, muscle weakness, unspecified abnormalities of gait and mobility, high blood pressure, type 2 diabetes, heart disease, and history of urinary tract infection. Record review of the MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident #1 usually understood others and usually made herself understood. The MDS indicated Resident #1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-07-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, and comfortable environment for 5 of 19 residents (Resident #16, Resident #19, Resident #21, Resident #40, and Resident #75) reviewed for environment. The facility failed to repair deep scrapes that exposed the sheetrock on the wall behind the head of the bed and on the wall next to the bed for Resident #16, Resident #19, Resident #21, and Resident #40. The facility failed to ensure Resident #75's bed linens were changed. This failure could place residents at risk for an uncomfortable, unhomelike environment, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included: 1. Record review of a face sheet dated 07/14/2023 indicated Resident #16 was an [AGE] year-old female initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included vascular dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral (loss of memory, language, problem solving and other thinking abilities that were severe enough to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-14 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident was informed before, or at the time of admission, and periodically during the residents stay, of services available in the facility and of changes for those services, which included changes for services not covered under Medicare/Medicaid or by the facility's per diem rate for 2 of 3 residents (Residents #9 and #129) reviewed for Medicare/Medicaid coverage. The facility failed to ensure Resident #9 and #129 was given a SNF ABN when discharged from skilled services at the facility prior to covered days being exhausted. This failure could place residents at risk for not being aware of changes to provided services. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #9's face sheet, dated 07/12/2023, indicated Resident #9 was an [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis which included dementia (loss of memory, language, problem solving and other thinking abilities that were severe enough to interfere with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-14 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to implement written policies that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation for 1 of 19 (Resident #4) residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility did not implement their abuse and neglect policy and procedure when the staff did not report Resident #4's bruises of unknown source to the abuse coordinator. This failure could place the residents at increased risk for abuse and neglect. The findings included: Record review of the face sheet, dated 07/11/23, revealed Resident #4 was an [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Parkinson's disease (a chronic and progressive movement disorder that initially causes tremor in one hand, stiffness, or slowing of movement), unspecified dementia, without behavioral disturbance (group of symptoms that affects memory, thinking and interferes with daily life), history of cerebral infarction (stroke), history of a heart attack, hypertension (high…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, were reported immediately, but no later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, for 1 of 19 residents (Resident #4) reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility did not ensure facility staff reported bruising of unknown origin for Resident #4 to the abuse coordinator (Administrator). This failure could place the residents at increased risk for abuse and neglect. The findings included: Record review of the face sheet, dated 07/11/23, revealed Resident #4 was an [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Parkinson's disease (a chronic and progressive movement disorder that initially causes tremor in one hand, stiffness, or slowing of movement), unspecified dementia, without behavioral disturbance (group of symptoms that affects…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-14 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to develop the baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #75) reviewed for baseline care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #75 had a baseline care plan completed within 48 hours of admission This failure could affect residents by not addressing their physical, mental, and psychosocial needs for each resident to attain or maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial outcome. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 07/11/2023, indicated Resident #75 was a [AGE] year-old male initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses which included end stage renal disease (kidneys cease functioning on a permanent basis), cerebral infarction due to embolism of unspecified cerebellar artery (damage to tissues in the brain due to a loss of oxygen to the area caused by a blood clot), and type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to develop or implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan to meet resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 13 residents reviewed for care plans. (Resident #4) The facility did not implement Resident #4's care plan related to anticoagulant therapy. This failure could place residents at risk for inaccurate care plans and decreased quality of care. The findings included: Record review of the face sheet, dated 07/11/23, revealed Resident #4 was an [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Parkinson's disease (a chronic and progressive movement disorder that initially causes tremor in one hand, stiffness, or slowing of movement), unspecified dementia, without behavioral disturbance (group of symptoms that affects memory, thinking and interferes with daily life), history of cerebral infarction (stroke), history of a heart attack,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-14 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the comprehensive care plan was reviewed by the interdisciplinary team and that the resident was invited to participate in developing the care plan and making decisions about his or her care for 1 of 19 residents (Resident #75) reviewed for care plan timing and revision. The facility failed to ensure Resident #75 was invited to participate in the development and review of his care plan. This failure could place residents at risk of not being able to attain or maintain their highest practicable level of physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 07/11/2023, indicated Resident #75 was a [AGE] year-old male initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses which included end stage renal disease (kidneys cease functioning on a permanent basis), cerebral infarction due to embolism of unspecified cerebellar artery (damage to tissues in the brain due…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents requiring respiratory care were provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practices for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #54 and Resident #75) reviewed for respiratory care. 1. The facility did not ensure Resident #54 had a physician's order for oxygen that she wore continuously. 2. The facility failed to administer oxygen at 2 liters per minute via nasal cannula as prescribed by the physician for Resident #75. These failures could place residents who receive respiratory care at risk for developing respiratory complications. The findings included: 1. Record review of the face sheet, dated 07/11/2023, revealed Resident #54 was an [AGE] year-old female who initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses of chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (not enough oxygen in the blood), shortness of breath, and COPD - chronic obstructive respiratory disease (chronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-14 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents who require dialysis received such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan and the residents' goals and preferences for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #75) reviewed for dialysis. The facility failed to have physician's orders for the care of Resident #75's central venous catheter used for dialysis (a long, flexible tube inserted into a vein in your neck, chest, arm, or groin and leads to a large vein that empties into your heart and is used as a dialysis access). The facility failed to care plan Resident #75's central venous catheter used for dialysis. These failures could place residents at risk for complications and not receiving proper care and treatment to meet their needs. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 07/11/2023, indicated Resident #75 was a [AGE] year-old male initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-14 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that licensed nurses have the specific competencies and skill sets necessary to care for residents' needs, as identified through resident assessments, and described in the plan of care for 1 of 13 residents reviewed (Resident #4) for anticoagulant monitoring and skin assessments. 1. The facility did not ensure the physician orders for anticoagulant monitoring on Resident #4 were adequately followed, when Resident #4 had an increase in bruising while taking an anticoagulant medication (blood thinner that works by preventing red blood cells from forming clots). 2. The facility did not ensure LVN L, who was the treatment nurse, accurately performed weekly skin assessment's resulting in no documentation of Resident #4's bruising. These failures could place residents at an increased risk for bleeding, bruising, and not receiving the care and services to meet their individual needs. The findings included: Record review of the face sheet,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-14 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to collaborate with hospice representatives and coordinate the hospice care planning process for each resident receiving hospice services, to ensure quality of care for the resident, ensuring communication with the hospice medical director, the resident's attending physician, and others participating in the provision of care for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #68) reviewed for hospice services. The facility did not ensure Resident #68's hospice records were a part of their records in the facility This deficient practice could place residents who receive hospice services at-risk of receiving inadequate end-of-life care due to a lack of documentation, coordination of care and communication of resident needs. The findings were: Record review of a face sheet dated 07/11/2023, indicated Resident #68 was a [AGE] year-old female initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses which included severe protein-calorie malnutrition…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 6 staff (NA H) reviewed for infection control. The facility did not ensure NA H performed hand hygiene while providing incontinent care to Resident #26. The facility did not ensure NA H cleaned Resident #26 peri-anal area before placing a clean brief underneath her. These failures could place residents and staff at risk for cross-contamination and the spread of infection. Findings included: During an observation on 07/11/2023 at 1:50 p.m., NA H and CNA K provided incontinent care to Resident #26. NA H and CNA K performed hand hygiene and put on gloves. NA H unfastened Resident #26's brief. NA H cleaned Resident #26's front peri area. NA H removed her gloves and put on new gloves without performing hand hygiene. NA H rolled Resident #26 to the left side, removed the soiled brief, and placed a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to OPCO SKILLED MANAGEMENT — 66 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.2-0.2 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 51.7+0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.3-0.3 vs chain
The other 65 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
1 of 5Bluebird Wellness And RehabilitationSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Brentwood Place ThreeDallas, TX 1 of 5Broadway Nursing & RehabilitationSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5Cameron Nursing CenterCameron, MO 1 of 5Carmel Hills Wellness & RehabilitationIndependence, MO 1 of 5Casa Arena Healthcare LLCAlamogordo, NM 1 of 5Casa Maria HealthcareRoswell, NM 1 of 5Forest Park Nursing & RehabilitationDallas, TX 1 of 5Fort Worth Wellness & RehabilitationFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Glenview Wellness & RehabilitationNorth Richland Hills, TX 1 of 5Highland Pines Nursing HomeLongview, TX 1 of 5Ivy Creek Wellness & RehabilitationWaco, TX 1 of 5Las Cruces Village Nursing & Rehabilitation LLCLas Cruces, NM 1 of 5Magnolia Wellness CenterSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Maple Grove Wellness & RehabilitationFenton, MO 1 of 5Mineola Gardens Wellness & RehabilitationMineola, TX 1 of 5Pine Grove ManorSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Rehab Of Kansas City SouthKansas City, MO 1 of 5The Hillcrest Of North DallasDallas, TX 1 of 5West Side Campus Of CareWhite Settlement, TX 1 of 5Willow Ridge Wellness & RehabilitationFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Willowcreek Wellness & RehabilitationFlorissant, MO 2 of 5Arbor Lake Nursing & Rehabilitation, LLCFort Worth, TX 2 of 5Aztec HealthcareAztec, NM 2 of 5Betty Dare Wellness & Rehabilitation LLCAlamogordo, NM 2 of 5Blue Springs Wellness & RehabilitationBlue Springs, MO 2 of 5Cypress Springs Wellness & RehabilitationMount Vernon, TX 2 of 5Fiesta Park Wellness & RehabilitationAlbuquerque, NM 2 of 5Hilltop At Blue River, TheKansas City, MO 2 of 5La Vida Buena HealthcareLas Vegas, NM 2 of 5Los Alamos Wellness & RehabilitationLos Alamos, NM 2 of 5McGregor Wellness & RehabilitationMc Gregor, TX 2 of 5Monarch Springs Wellness & RehabilitationUniversity City, MO 2 of 5Northrise Wellness & RehabilitationLas Cruces, NM 2 of 5Prescott Valley Nursing & RehabilitationPrescott Valley, AZ 2 of 5Prescott Village Nursing & RehabilitationPrescott, AZ 2 of 5Rehabilitation Center Of Independence, TheIndependence, MO 2 of 5San Antonio Wellness & RehabilitationSan Antonio, TX 2 of 5Skyline Nursing CenterDallas, TX 2 of 5White Acres Wellness & RehabilitationEl Paso, TX

Showing 40 of 65; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
NOCONA HOSPITAL DISTRICTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 03/01/2015
MEEKINS, GREGIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 03/01/2015
SULPHUR SPRINGS HEALTHCARE LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/01/2015
GARETZ, DAVIDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2020
PETRY, STEPHANIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/03/2023
PETTY, JAREDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/25/2025
KAPLAN, ESTHERIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2025
KAPLAN, MORDECHAIIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/10/2025
MINDLE, ADAMIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2025
UNGER, JEFFREYIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2025
1200 JACKSON STREET NORTH, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/28/2017
CONTINUUM REHAB GROUP LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/28/2017
KGSS REALTY, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/28/2017
LARCHMONT REALTY, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/28/2017
MONTGOMERY SKY TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/28/2017
OPCO CA SKILLED MGMT INC.OrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/28/2017
OPCO TEXAS SKILLED MGMT LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/28/2017
GURWITZ, SOLOMONIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 03/28/2017

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-7.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 68%Medicare 4%Other / private 28%

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$244per resident / day
operating cost
$7,403per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$226per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 675664. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next