No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Magnolia Wellness Center

3421 Gasconade, Saint Louis, MO 63118 · For profit - Individual · 120 certified beds · (314) 832-4700 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseResident-funds citations (F0567, F0568, F0569)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0740)2 immediate-jeopardy citations1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$209,790 in federal fines3 Medicare payment denials
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Aug 2025
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567, F0568, F0569)
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (84) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $209,790 in federal fines (most recent 2025-10-24)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (64%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
3900 S Grand Blvd · (314) 771-5800 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
3300 Meramec St · (314) 353-3300 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
4135 S Grand Blvd · (314) 556-8670 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Marquette Recreation Center, 4048 Louisiana Ave · (314) 353-1250 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
4058 S Grand Blvd · (314) 774-1463

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased4.2%18.1%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.7%5.3%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.2%1.1%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.3%2.3%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms33.0%18.5%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%4.1%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened8.3%17.4%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication11.6%25.6%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine89.2%90.9%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.3%4.5%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control11.1%17.8%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table15.3%23.5%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%2.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine58.5%63.5%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission25.8%26.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit2.9%13.7%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days4.132.111.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.942.331.80typical

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

10.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.21U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.08hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 24% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.6%CMS range 6.3–15.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified76.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.661.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.25
RN hours/ resident / day
0.79
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.10
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.14
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.15
RN hoursweekends
63.6%
Total nursing turnover
40.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 77.8 residents a day — about 65% occupied, or roughly 42 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.14 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.25 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.10 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.63 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.34 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.29 to 0.15 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 64% is well above the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

13
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-02-15)
29
at the previous standard inspection (2021-12-08)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

84 citations, most serious first. The 19 most serious are shown; the remaining 65 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide acceptable nursing services by not directly and continuously monitoring and intervening for one resident who was in respiratory distress (Resident #1). Two therapy staff found the resident difficult to wake, breathing heavily, and would groan and open and then close his/her eyes when his/her name was called. The resident was identified not connected to the oxygen concentrator and the resident did not have his/her BiPap on. The concentrator was broken. When staff attempted to use the emergency oxygen tank (e-tank) on the back of the resident's wheelchair, it was found empty, further delaying treatment while staff went to retrieve a full e-tank. Staff applied the nasal cannula with oxygen at 4 liters from the e-tank. The resident had an order for a BiPap which was not applied when the resident was noted to be in distress. The resident's oxygen saturation level was 68%. When Emergency Medical Services (EMS) arrived at the resident's bedside, the resident was unattended, prone (chest down) on a flat bed, with his/her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record reviews, personnel file review, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to have two staff available during the mechanical lift transfer of one resident (Resident (R) 73). Staff failed to ensure the mechanical lift device was in working order and inspection of the device showed it had missing bolts. During the transfer, the lift collapsed. The resident was later transferred to the hospital, diagnosed with a brain bleed, underwent surgery, and expired. This had the likelihood to cause serious injury, harm or death for any of the 76 residents that could be transferred by untrained personnel. An Immediate Jeopardy was identified on [DATE] and was determined to exist starting on [DATE]. The Administrator and Director of Nursing were notified on [DATE] at 9:24 PM. The facility was notified that an acceptable plan of removal had been accepted and verified as implemented on [DATE]. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Lifting Machine, Using a Mechanical,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-06-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate treatment and services for two residents with pressure ulcers (wounds related to prolonged pressure on bony prominences) (Resident #1 and #5) and interventions to prevent pressure ulcers for one resident (Resident #1). The facility failed to provide treatments as ordered and change dressings when saturated, (Residents #1 and #5). The facility also failed to provide Residents #1 with a low air loss mattress (LAL, special mattress that reduces pressure and moisture to prevent wounds) set to the correct settings and pressure-reducing devices, per the care plan. Staff did not lay Resident #5 in bed between meals, as recommended by the Wound Physician and Director of Nursing. Resident #1 and Resident #5 both experienced worsening pressure ulcers. The sample size was 21. The census was 74. Review of the facility's Wound Management policy, dated 06/2020, showed: - To provide a system for the treatment and management of residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-06-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident safety and protective oversight. During a staff-assisted transfer from a wheelchair to a bed, one resident's (Resident #16) foot became entangled in the wheelchair wheel, resulting in a femur fracture requiring hospitalization and surgical repair. In addition, the facility failed to follow its mechanical lift policy during a resident transfer (Resident #69) and failed to ensure safe smoking practices for residents who smoked (Residents #32, #66 and #71) and follow the smoking policy and schedule. The sample size was 21. The census was 74. Review of the gait belt policy, revised 6/2020, showed:-Purpose: To provide assistance to clinical staff when moving a resident from one place to another and to increase the safety of residents by allowing clinical staff members to grip it and keep the resident from falling.-Policy: A gait belt may be used for residents who are too weak to walk or stand alone, or required assistance during…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Deficiency Text Not Available

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-12-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident (Resident #12) received adequate supervision and interventions to ensure his/her safety while on Leave of Absence (LOA). Resident #12 admitted to consuming alcohol while on LOA and returned to the facility twice, with injuries from reported altercations while on LOA. The facility did not develop interventions and revise the resident's care plan regarding the frequent LOAs, the medications that were not received while on LOA, and the safety concerns for the resident while he/she was on LOA. The sample was 11. The census was 76.Review of the facility's Out on Pass policy, revised August 2020, showed:-It was the policy of the facility to meet resident's physical and psychosocial needs to go out on pass. The facility will make reasonable efforts to ensure the resident's safety and uphold residents rights;-When a resident requests to go out on pass, the interdisciplinary team (IDT) will assess the resident's ability to participate in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-10-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided adequate assistance to prevent accidents for one of four sampled residents (Resident #1) when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) B and CNA C used a Hoyer lift (full body lift, used for residents who are unable to move themselves), to transfer the resident but did not use the correct size sling. While the resident was suspended in mid-air, the sling straps broke, and the resident fell to the ground and hit his/her head. This caused a laceration (cut) to the posterior side (back side) of the resident's head. The resident was sent to the hospital and required sutures. The sample size was 4. The census was 92. The facility was notified of the past non-compliance on 10/24/25. The facility initiated their investigation and suspended both CNAs pending investigation. All staff were in-serviced. The staff demonstrated followed their policy following the incident. The two CNAs alleged to be in the room when the incident occurred had scheduled 1-1 in-service and training prior to returning to the facility.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-03-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to be free from abuse was not violated, when residents were involved in physical resident to resident altercations. Staff witnessed Resident #6 engage in a verbal altercation with Resident #5. Resident #5 then choked the neck of Resident #6, which caused bruising to the resident's neck and a sore throat. The sample was 8. The census was 87. Review of the facility's Abuse Prevention and Prohibition Program, revised 10/24/22, showed: -Purpose: To ensure the facility establishes, operationalizes, and maintains an abuse prevention and prohibition program designed to screen and train employees, protect residents, and to ensure a standardized methodology for the prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of abuse, neglect, mistreatment, misappropriation of property, and crime in accordance with federal and state requirements; -Policy: Each resident has the right to be free from mistreatment, neglect, abuse, involuntary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2021-12-08 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate care and services were provided to residents with pressure ulcers (injury to the skin and underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure or friction). The facility failed to document weekly wound assessments, failed to notify the physician of new wound development delaying the resident's treatment and failed to identify a newly acquired Deep Tissue Pressure Injury (DTPI). Facility staff also failed to consistently ensure pressure ulcer treatments and interventions were performed according to the wound specialist's recommendations or as ordered and failed to ensure prevention interventions were completed as ordered. This resulted in a delay of 11 days in obtaining orders and treating a pressure ulcer for one resident (Resident #15). When the wound was first staged, it was identified as unstageable (an ulcer that has full thickness tissue loss but is covered by extensive necrotic (dead) tissue).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment by not providing an adequate supply of linens for resident care. In addition, the first-floor dining room had areas with baseboards missing, creating holes in the wall. The census was 74.Review of the facility's Residents Rights policy last revised August 2020, showed, the facility must treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment, that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life. 1. Observation on 6/8/26 at 5:30 A.M., of the second-floor linen room showed two blankets and no other linen. The linen cart had one fitted bed sheet and two towels. Observation on 6/12/26 at 7:28 A.M., showed:-The first-floor linen room had 7 washcloths, 4 bath towels and no bed linens;-The first-floor linen cart on the had no washcloths, towels or bed linens;-The second-floor linen room had no washcloths, 4 bath towels, and no bed linens;-The second-floor linen cart had two fitted bed sheets. During an interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Deficiency Text Not Available

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Deficiency Text Not Available

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Deficiency Text Not Available

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-12 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — pattern
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary behavioral health care services for four residents' psychosocial well-being when staff did not address the resident's behaviors, which included repeatedly violating the Drug and Alcohol Abuse, Out on Pass, Visiting and Contraband policies and demonstrating physical and verbal aggression toward other residents and staff (Residents #4, #1, #7 and #5). The sample was 11. The census was 80. Review of the facility's behavior management policy, revised June 2020, showed:-Purpose: To implement the most desirable and effective interventions to change, modify, decrease, or eliminate behaviors that are distressing to the resident, and/or are decreasing or negatively impacting the residents' quality of life. To ensure facility staff performs a timely and appropriate assessment of the resident's behavioral symptoms and implement appropriate interventions before and after the resident begins taking psychotherapeutic medications. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to establish a system of records of receipt and disposition of all controlled drugs in sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation. Staff failed to accurately and thoroughly document the controlled substance shift change inventory tracker sheets, for one of the two facility floors. The census was 80.Review of the facility's Controlled Substance Prescriptions policy, revised August 2020, showed the following:-Policy: -Medications included in the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) classification as controlled substances and medications classified as controlled substances by state law are subject to special ordering, receipt, and record keeping requirements in the facility, in accordance with federal and state laws and regulations;-The Director of Nursing and the contracted consultant pharmacist maintain the facility's compliance with federal and state laws and regulations in the handling of controlled medications. Only authorized, licensed nursing and pharmacy personnel have access to controlled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the abuse prevention policy and complete a thorough investigation related to an injury of unknown origin for one resident (Resident #16), when the facility identified healed right rib fractures from an unknown cause. The census was 76.Review of the Abuse Prevention and Prohibition Program, revised October 24, 2022, showed:-Purpose: To ensure the facility establishes, operationalizes and maintains an abuse prevention and prohibition program designated to screen and train employees, protect the residents, and to ensure a standardized methodology for the prevention, identification, investigation and reporting of abuse, neglect, mistreatment, misappropriation of property, and crime in accordance with federal and state requirements;Policy:-Each resident has the right to be free from mistreatment, neglect, abuse, involuntary seclusion and misappropriation of property. The facility has zero-tolerance for abuse, neglect, mistreatment, and/or misappropriation of resident property. Staff must not permit anyone to engage in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two residents' right to be free from abuse was not violated, when a staff member threatened a resident, using profanity and was held back by other staff (Resident #6). In addition, Residents #1 and #2 were involved in a physical resident to resident altercation. Resident #2 flipped Resident #1's mattress over, which caused Resident #1 to fall and hit the floor. The sample was 9. The census was 85. The Administrator was notified on 8/15/25 at 9:56 A.M. of the past non-compliance, which began on 7/13/25. The facility immediately separated Resident #6 and the employee, who threatened the resident. The employee was suspended pending investigation and later terminated. Staff determined there was no physical injury to the resident. The resident's care plan was updated and social services followed up with the resident. In addition, the facility provided education for staff on de-escalation. In addition, the Administrator was notified on 8/15/25 at 9:56…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with respect and dignity when an employee did not accommodate one resident's request for condiments during meal service, and engaged in an argument with the resident (Resident #3). The sample was seven. The census was 86. The Administrator was notified on 6/25/25 at 3:53 P.M., of the past non-compliance, which occurred on 6/15/25. The facility provided in-servicing for staff regarding interventions to deescalate when a resident becomes agitated. The deficiency was corrected on 6/23/25. Review of the facility's Privacy and Dignity policy, revised June 2020, showed: -Purpose: To ensure that care and services provide by the facility promote and/or enhance privacy, dignity and overall quality of life; -Policy: The facility promotes resident care in a manner and an environment that maintains or enhances dignity and respect, in full recognition of each resident's individuality; -Procedure: -Staff assists the residents in maintaining self-esteem and self-worth; -The facility promotes independence and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-02 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Deficiency Text Not Available

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 65 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Deficiency Text Not Available

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-26 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%. Out of 34 opportunities observed, nine errors occurred resulting in a 26.47% error rate (Residents #11, #7, #12 and #4). In addition, Resident #1, Resident #4, and residents attending the 3/3/25 Resident Council meeting complained about receiving medications late. The census was 86. Review of the facility Medication-Administration policy, dated 5/2017, showed: -Policy: It is the policy of this home that medications will be administered and documented as ordered by the physician and in accordance with state regulations; -Procedure: -Medications are prepared, administered, and recorded only by licensed nursing, Certified Medications Technicians (CMTs), medical, pharmacy, or other personnel authorized by state laws and regulations to administer medications; -Current medications and dosage schedules are listed on the resident's Medication Administration Record (MAR); -Medications are administered within 60 minutes of scheduled time (60 minutes before or after the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who required enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for infection control interventions had a sign on their door or wall next to the room entrance instructing staff to use EBPs while providing personal care. In addition, the facility failed to ensure personal protective equipment (PPE, gloves, gowns, masks and goggles/face shields) were readily accessible for residents requiring EBP, and staff were inserviced on EBP and which residents required EBPs. The facility identified 18 residents who required EBPs, and this had the potential to affect all residents (Residents #5, #6 and #3). The census was 86. Review of the facility's Standard and Enhanced Precautions policy, dated 4/1/24, showed: -Purpose: To ensure the use of appropriate personal protective equipment to improve infection control as required in the care of residents; -Policy: The facility will utilize current guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff consistently notified physicians when residents' high blood glucose levels exceeded the ordered parameters. The facility identified 10 residents with orders for routine blood glucose level checks, four were sampled and problems were found with two (Residents #13 and #3). The census was 86. Review of the facility Change of Condition - Observing, Reporting and Recording policy, dated 5/17, showed: -Policy: It is the policy of this home to inform the resident, the resident's physician and if indicated the resident's responsible party of the following: -A significant change in the resident's physical, mental or psychosocial status, such as a deterioration in health, mental or psychosocial status, in life-threatening conditions or clinical complications; -A need to alter treatment significantly; -The attending physician should be notified as soon as possible when immediate attention is required; -Documentation: -Date, time…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #3's physician was notified and monitoring was started after staff documented on shower review forms the resident had blisters on his/her bilateral feet. In addition, the facility failed to ensure staff initialed treatments had been completed and failed to ensure the resident wore his/her protective boots. Three residents were sampled and problems were found with one. The census was 86. Review of the facility Wound Management policy, dated 06/2020, showed: -Purpose: To provide a system for the treatment and management of residents wit wounds including pressure and non-pressure injury; -Policy: A resident who has a wound will receive necessary treatment and services to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new pressure injuries from developing; -Definitions: -Diabetic Neuropathic Ulcer: requires that the resident be diagnosed with diabetes mellitus (DM, high/low blood sugar) and peripheral neuropathy (damage or disease affecting the nerves). The diabetic ulcer characteristically occurs…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide services and/or treatment to increase or prevent reduction of range of motion. The facility failed to maintain a measurable, goal oriented restorative nursing program, and/or exercise program, to ensure residents requiring physical assistance were assisted by staff to maintain or improve their physical abilities, per facility policy. The facility provided a list of 11 current residents who had been discharged from skilled therapy services. Of those 11, two were identified with concerns of not getting recommended restorative therapy (Residents #21 and #19). The census was 87. Review of the facility Restorative Nursing Program Guidelines, dated 6/20, showed the following: -Purpose: The Restorative Nursing Program provides nursing interventions that promote the resident's ability to adapt and adjust to living as independently and safely as possible. This program actively focuses on achieving and maintaining optimal physical, mental, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-04 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary behavioral health care services when staff did not intervene during a resident's agitated and heightened state (Resident #6) who then kicked another resident (Resident #8). The facility also failed to intervene when Residents #6 and #5 were involved in a verbal altercation that led to Resident #5 reaching out and wrapping his/her hands around Resident #6's neck. Resident #6 complained of bruising to his/her neck and a sore throat. The sample was 8. The census was 87. Review of the facility's Behavior Management policy, revised 06/2020, showed: -Purpose: To implement the most desirable and effective interventions to change, modify, decrease, or eliminate behaviors that are distressing to the resident, and/or are decreasing or negatively impacting the resident's quality of life; -The facility is responsible for providing behavioral health care and services that create an environment that promotes emotional and psychosocial…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to be free from abuse was not violated, when residents were involved in physical resident to resident altercation, in which one resident placed their hands around another resident's neck (Residents #1 and #2). The sample was 32. The facility census was 74. The facility was notified of past non-compliance on 7/2/24. Facility staff immediately intervened, notified administration, separated the residents, and provided assessment and services to the involved residents. Staff were in-serviced on abuse and neglect prevention. The deficiency was corrected on 6/29/24. Review of the facility's Abuse Prevention and Prohibition Program policy, dated 10/24/22, showed: -Purpose: To ensure the Facility establishes, operationalizes, and maintains an Abuse Prevention and Prohibition Program designed to screen and train employees, protect residents, and to ensure a standardized methodology for the prevention, identification,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · F2024-02-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure food was not expired, skim milk was available according to physician orders, dented cans were not stored in areas of usage, dish machine concentration levels were monitored, the hood was cleaned, and food temperatures were within proper parameters and properly monitored in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for one of one kitchen for 76 census residents. Findings include: Review of the job description for the Dietary Manager (DM), revised 04/20, revealed The dietary manager is responsible for assisting and supporting dietary staff within established state and federal regulations .The dietary manager is also responsible for assuring that meals are healthy, nutritious and look appealing and monitoring safety in the kitchen. Review of the facility's policy titled, Purchasing and Storage: Facility and Resident Food Supplies, revised 01/24, revealed Purchases shall be inspected upon delivery by the manager or his/her designee. Supplies which do not meet appropriate standards of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-15 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have a system in place to ensure residents' individual trust fund accounts were not allowed to go into a negative balance. The facility managed funds for 46 residents. A sample of eight residents were chosen and the practice affected four residents (Residents #101, #104, #56 and #105). The census was 74. Review of the facility's Trust Policies and Management Policy, undated, showed the following: -admission Requirement Regarding Resident Trust: Upon admission the resident or resident's representative may request the facility to hold the resident's funds in the resident trust account; -General Information Regarding Responsibilities of Holding Resident Funds: -The Business Office Manager (BOM) shall keep an accurate record and maintain the accounting system for the residents who choose to have their personal financial affairs managed; -These funds shall be safeguarded by the facility, including complete and separate accounting principles, which preclude any commingling of resident funds with facility funds; -There was no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-15 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, recipe review, and pureed food guideline review, the facility failed to ensure proper pureed consistency for residents receiving pureed texture of 76 census residents. Findings include: Review of the undated pureed meat recipe, provided by the facility, revealed Place entrée in blender. Grind. Add bread. Grind. Add 4[sic] oz [ounce] or ½ [half]cup liquid until consistency is smooth and between pudding and mashed potato consistency. Review of the undated Pureed Food Guideline, provided by the facility, revealed The consistency of the pureed food should not be thinner than pudding or thicker than mashed potatoes. During an observation on first floor meal service on 02/07/24 at 11:54 AM, the pureed texture had the appearance of moist mechanical soft texture. The staff serving the food confirmed it was supposed to be pureed meat. During an interview on 02/07/24 at 1:03 PM, the Dietary Manager (DM) stated Dietary Staff (DS) 2 was educated on the proper pureed texture. She stated pureed texture should have been more like mashed potato, pudding like…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-15 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable resident equipment for three of four residents (Residents (R) 44, R272, and R12) reviewed for wheelchair and recliner chair maintenance. The facility failed to ensure accessible Emergency Medical Services (EMS) access for 76 census residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Maintenance Service revealed Maintenance shall be provided to all areas of the building, grounds, and equipment. The maintenance department is responsible for maintaining the buildings, grounds, and equipment in a safe and operable manner at all times. Review of the facility policy Resident Environmental Quality, dated 08/13/04; and Safety and Supervision of Residents, revised July 2017 did not reveal information on maintaining a after hours emergency services access. No policy was provided that addressed functional door call systems for after hours emergency services…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments in the allotted time frame as stated in the Resident Assessment Instrument [RAI] manual for two of two residents (Resident (R) 171 and R173) reviewed. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled MDS Submission and Transmission Timeframes, revised July 2017, showed: Policy Statement Our facility will conduct and submit resident assessments in accordance with current federal and state submission timeframes. Policy Interpretation and Implementation 1. The Assessment Coordinator or designee is responsible for ensuring that resident assessments are submitted to CMS QIES Assessment Submission and Processing (ASAP) system in accordance with current federal and state guidelines. 2. Timeframes for completion and submission of assessments is based on the current requirements published in the he Resident Assessment Instrument Manual. Review of the October 2019 Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the Pre-admission Screen and Resident Review (PASARR) level one screen was completed prior to admission for one (Resident (R) 38) of three residents reviewed for PASARR. This created a potential failure to identify what specialized or rehabilitative services the resident needed and whether placement in the facility was appropriate prior to admission. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, admission Criteria revised 12/2016, indicated, .9. Potential residents with mental disorders or intellectual disabilities will only be admitted if the State mental health agency has determined (through the preadmission screening program) that the individual has a physical or mental condition that requires the level of services provided by the facility. Review of R38's admission Record, located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed an admission date of 11/22/17 with diagnoses that included schizophrenia and major depression. Review of R38's annual Minimum Data Set…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure care conferences were conducted for one of three residents (Resident (R) 16) reviewed for care conferences of 76 census residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, revised 12/16, revealed The care planning process will: facilitate resident and/or representative involvement . Review of R16's undated admission Record located under the Profile tab in the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), muscle weakness, other abnormalities of gait and mobility, and weakness. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/21/23 revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated the resident had intact cognition. During an interview on 02/05/24 at 10:13 AM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that one of two residents (Resident (R) 171) reviewed for bed rail use had a bed rail that was considered a safe design for use. This failure had the potential for the resident to become entrapped in the bed rail with a risk of severe injury and/or death with bed rail use. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Beds and Bed Safety Rails Program, effective 10/28/19, stated Purpose: 1. To establish and verify that NHS Facilities meet the requirements of the FDA and other regulatory agencies; And [sic] to establish mitigation and preventative requirements and activities that maintain a constant state of safety related to Resident Care Beds and Bed Safety Rails. Review of the facility's policy titled, Proper Use of Side Rails, revised December 2016, showed, The purposes of these guidelines are to ensure the safe use of side rails as resident mobility aids and to prohibit the use of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure timeliness of medication administration was provided for one of one resident (Resident (R38) reviewed for late medications of 76 census residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Administering Medications, revised 12/12, revealed Medications must be administered within one (1) hour of their prescribed time, unless otherwise specified. Review of R38's undated admission Record located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis which included type two diabetes, cerebrovascular disease, major depressive disorder, schizophrenia, and essential hypertension. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/04/23, revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 out of 15 which indicated the resident had intact cognition. Review of the Medication Admin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolated
    Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of manufacturer's instructions, the facility failed to ensure bed frames and rails, if present, were inspected and serviced per the Manufacturer's Instructions for Use (MIFU) to minimize the risks of bed malfunction and/or resident injury. This failure had the potential to affect any of the 76 residents who reside at the facility and use a bed. Findings include: Review of the facility policy Bed Safety, revised December 2007, showed: Our facility shall strive to provide a safe sleeping environment for the resident. Policy Interpretation and Implementation l. The resident's sleeping environment shall be assessed by the interdisciplinary team, considering the resident's safety, medical conditions, comfort, and freedom of movement, as well as input from the resident and family regarding previous sleeping habits and bed environment. 2. To try to prevent deaths/injuries from the beds and related equipment (including the frame, mattress, side rails, headboard, footboard, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — isolated
    Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to implement and maintain a training program for lift equipment training for one Certified Nurse Aides (CNA1). This failure to train CNA1 had the potential to affect the care and services provided to any of 76 residents that might require lift transfers by CNA4. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Orientation Program for Newly Hired Employees, Transfers, Volunteers, dated January 2008, did not address contract staff or training on facility equipment specifically, stating: 2. Our orientation program includes, but is not limited to: a. A tour of the facility, which includes: (1) A description of the resident population; (2) An overview of the resident's daily routine; and (3) A demonstration of the use of the resident's call light and intercom system. b. Instructions in procedures to be followed in an emergency which includes, but is not limited to: (1) Unusual occurrences with residents (i.e., accidents, wandering, missing, etc.); . (4) Accident prevention and emergency first…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-12-08 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — widespread
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities, both facility-sponsored group and individual activities, designed to meet the interests of each resident. The facility failed to employ an activity director qualified for the position, failed to maintain an activity director in the past year for a sufficient length of time to develop and implement an effective activities program, and failed to employ sufficient numbers of activity staff. The facility failed to ensure there was a current activities schedule and failed to ensure scheduled activities occurred. The facility failed to provide outdoor activities per residents request and failed to provide activities per residents choice as identified on the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment completed by facility staff), for three of four residents investigated for activities (Resident #35, #34, and #23). These failures had the potential to affect…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-12-08 · tag F0680 — widespread
    Ensure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the activities program was directed by a qualified professional. This affected all residents who resided in the facility. The census was 44. Review of the Facility Assessment, revised on 6/30/21, showed: -Identify the type of staff members, other health care professionals, and medical practitioners that are needed to provide support and care for residents: The facility included the activity director as a needed staff member; -In addition to nursing staff, other staff needed for behavioral healthcare and services (list other staff positions/roles): The facility included the activity director as a needed staff member. Observation of the second floor activity calendar, on all days of the survey from 12/1/21 through 12/3/21 and 12/6/21 through 12/8/21, showed the following: -Activities for the month of: 2021, (no month listed); -Sundays: Blank; -Mondays: 10: 00 A.M., outside chat and 11:00 A.M., movies; -Tuesdays: Bingo, no time listed; -Wednesdays: 10:00 A.M., Bible study and craft; -Thursdays: Bingo, no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2021-12-08 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to use the services of a registered nurse (RN) for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week. In addition, the facility failed to designate a RN to serve as the Director of Nursing (DON) on a full time basis. The census was 44. Review of the facility's Facility Assessment Tool, last reviewed on 6/30/21, showed: -Average daily census: 40-50; -Staff type, included: Administrator, DON, unit managers, RN, licensed practical nurses (LPNs), certified medication technicians (CMTs) and certified nursing assistants (CNAs); -Staffing plan: Total number needed, average, or range: -Licensed nurses providing direct care: 10 (agency also used); -Other nursing personnel (e.g., those with administrative duties): five; -This facility reviews and updates job descriptions annually. The facility administration also reviews the staffing needs and the needs of the residents on an ongoing basis. The facility works on recruitment and retention continually offering bonus programs for new hires, retention bonus programs for those…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2021-12-08 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for its residents competently during both day-to-day operations and emergencies. At the time of the survey, the facility assessment in use at the facility was a facility assessment for a sister facility. The census was 44. Review of the Facility Assessment Tool provided by the facility as their facility assessment, last reviewed on 6/30/21, showed: -Average daily census: 40-50; -Physical environment and building/plan needs: The facility is a large one-story community with 240 licensed skilled beds. Review of the facility layout, showed the facility had three levels. The ground level, first floor and second floor. Review of the facility's bed listing, showed a capacity of 120. Further review of the Facility Assessment Tool, showed the facility assessment belonged to a different facility. During an interview on 12/10/21 at 3:40 P.M., the administrator said she was not sure if there was another facility assessment or not. She is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2021-12-08 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee made good faith attempts to identify and correct quality deficiencies. The facility administrator had only been at the facility for a month at the time of the survey and had not yet held a QAPI meeting. The prior administration had no current performance improvement projects identified or implemented. The survey team identify quality deficiencies for infection control, staffing, wounds, weights and activities. This failure had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The census was 44. Review of the facility's undated Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Committee policy, showed: -This facility shall establish and maintain a QAPI Committee that oversees the implementation of the QAPI program; -The administrator shall delegate the necessary authority for the QAPI Committee to establish, maintain and oversee the QAPI program; -The committee shall…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-12-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their infection surveillance program and failed to ensure the infection preventionist acted in that capacity at the facility. During the time of the survey, the infection preventionist worked as the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff) coordinator on a part time basis and had not yet implemented any aspect of the infection prevention and control program. The prior infection preventionist had left employment and had last implemented the program in May 2021, nearly 6 months prior. This resulted in one resident with a wound infection not to be identified by the facility as a resident with an infection (Resident #15). The facility failed to ensure staff used acceptable infection control procedures during perineal care, for one of three residents observed during personal care (Resident #3). The facility failed to ensure staff properly sanitized shared medical equipment before…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-12-08 · tag F0564 — pattern
    Inform each resident of his or her visitation rights and ensure that all visitors enjoy equal visitation privileges.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to communicate changes in their visitation policy to residents and representatives in a widespread or timely manner. This resulted in two sampled residents (Residents #41 and #34) and their family members to adhere to the more restrictive visitation policy, which denied the residents' rights to have visitors per their preference. This had the potential to affect all residents who would choose to have visitors. The sample size was 12. The census was 44. Review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Nursing Home Visitation Covid-19 (Revised) Memorandum, revised on 11/12/21, showed: -CMS is committed to continuing to take critical steps to ensure America's healthcare facilities are prepared to respond to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Public Health Emergency (PHE); -Visitation Guidance: CMS is issuing new guidance for visitation in nursing homes during the COVID-19 PHE, including the impact of COVID-19 vaccination;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-08 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to perform admission review (Residents #4, #34 and #244) and a yearly review (Residents #15 and #26) of code status (full code-if the heart stops beating or breathing ceases, all lifesaving methods are performed) or no code (do not resuscitate, no life prolonging methods are performed). The sample size was 12. The census was 44. 1. Review of Resident #4's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated [DATE], showed: -admission date: [DATE]; -Independent with self care activities; -Diagnoses included high blood pressure and cirrhosis (late stage liver disease). Review of the resident's medical record, showed: -Resident is their own responsible party; -No order for code status; -No code status form signed by the resident; -Code status not addressed on the care plan. Review of the code status binder at the nurses' station, showed no information for the resident. During an interview on [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents had a clean, comfortable and homelike environment when they served residents meals in Styrofoam containers and on cafeteria-style trays. The facility failed to maintain shower rooms in working order. In addition, the facility failed to ensure the walls, floors, and cove base in common areas and the medication and treatment carts were clean and in good repair. The census was 44. 1. Observations of the second floor dining room on 12/1/21 at 12:08 P.M., 12/3/21 at 9:09 A.M., and 12:41 P.M., 12/6/21 at 1:00 P.M., and 5:49 P.M. and 12/7/21 at 8:21 A.M., showed: -Residents were served trays with disposable Styrofoam food containers, plastic cups and plastic flatware; -Staff failed to remove the cafeteria- style trays from the tables after staff served food to the residents. During the entrance conference on 12/1/21 at 8:47 A.M., the administrator said there were no positive or suspected cases of COVID-19 in the building.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-12-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had complete, accurate and individualized care plans to address the specific needs of each resident. This affected five residents (Residents #34, #30, #35, #23 and #2) out of 12 sampled residents. The facility's census was 44. 1. Review of Resident #34's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff), dated 11/6/21, showed: -Required total assistance from staff for dressing, personal hygiene, toileting, mobility and transfers; -Always incontinent of bowel and bladder; -Diagnoses included high blood pressure, stroke and choric obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, lung disease). Review of the resident's care plan, in use during the survey, showed: -Problem: Resident has limited physical mobility related to weakness; -Goal: The resident will remain free from complications related to immobility, including contractures, thrombus formation (blood clot), skin breakdown,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-08 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards of quality for residents by failing to administer supplements as ordered by the physician (Resident #4), clarify conflicting physician orders (Resident #15) and ensuring staff did not substitute a medication for other medications, without a corresponding physician order (Resident #8). The facility failed to obtain an order for blood glucose monitoring which staff performed but also did not document (Resident #244). Additionally, staff failed to obtain and document monthly weights (Residents #26, #18, #2 and #25). The sample was 12. The census was 44. Review of the facility's undated Following Physician's Orders policy, showed: -The purpose of a physician's order is to communicate the medial care that a resident is to receive while in our facility, as well as to document the medications, treatments and tests that are to be/have been provided; -Once orders are obtained for a new resident,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-12-08 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed ensure there are a sufficient number of skilled licensed nurses to provide nursing care to all residents in accordance with resident care plans and per the facility assessment. The facility failed to ensure a licensed nurse was on duty each shift, which resulted in the administrator having to forego her administrative duties at the facility to work as the charge nurse on the floor. The administrator's office was located on the first floor and all residents resided on the second floor. This resulted in resident's not receiving a treatment as ordered and improper documentation that residents received their ordered medications (Residents #15 and #40). The sample was 12. The census was 44. 1. During the entrance conference on 12/1/21 at 8:47 A.M., the administrator said the facility does not currently have a Director of Nursing (DON). The facility does use agency staff intermittently. She is a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN). All residents reside on the second floor. Review of the facility's Facility Assessment Tool,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to establish a system of records of receipt and disposition of all controlled drugs in sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation, for one of one narcotic book reviewed. In addition, the facility failed to account for all controlled drugs when a narcotic removed from stock was not accounted for (Resident #15). The census was 44. Review of the facility's Controlled substance policy, revised December 2012, showed: -The facility shall comply with all laws, regulations and other requirements related to handling, storage, disposal and documentation of controlled substances; -Controlled substances must be counted upon delivery. The nurse receiving the medication, along with the person delivering the medication, must count the controlled substances together. Both individuals must sign the designated controlled substance record; -If the count is correct, an individual resident controlled substance record must be made fore each resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-08 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%. Out of 40 opportunities observed, nine errors occurred resulting in a 22.5% error rate (Residents #37, #25, #8 and #15). The census was 44. Review of the facility's undated Following Physician's Orders policy, showed: -The purpose of a physician's order is to communicate the medial care that a resident is to receive while in our facility, as well as to document the medications, treatments and tests that are to be/have been provided; -Once orders are obtained for a new resident, the charge nurse is to transcribe them onto a physician's order sheet and the physician then called to verify those orders. Once this is completed, the charge nurse must sign off that all orders have been verified; -After orders are written for a new resident, this is the responsibility of the charge nurse to process these orders and advice the various departments that may be involved in carrying out the procedures,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals are stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted practices, and include the appropriate expiration date. The facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments and permit only authorized personnel to have access to the keys. In addition, the facility failed to ensure narcotic medications were separately locked, behind two locks. These practices affected four of four medication/treatment carts and one of one medication room reviewed. The facility identified five medication/treatment carts and one medication room in use at the facility. The census was 44. Review of the facility's Storage of Medications policy, revised April 2007, showed: -The facility shall store all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure and orderly manor; -Drugs and biologicals shall be stored in the packaging, containers or other dispensing systems in which they are received; -The nursing staff shall be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-12-08 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was served palatable and at a safe and appetizing temperature during meal service by failing to maintain the temperature of hot food at least at 120 degrees Fahrenheit (F) for two of two trays sampled. The census was 44. 1. Review of Resident #18's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff), dated 9/24/21, showed: -Cognitively intact; -Independent with eating; -Diagnoses included diabetes mellitus, high cholesterol, stroke and anxiety. During an interview on 12/1/21 at 10:49 A.M., Resident #18 said he/she doesn't like the food served at the facility. He/she can't eat the food without feeling sick and it upsets his/her stomach. The food is poor quality and it doesn't taste good. He/she is on a mechanical soft diet because he/she has issues with choking. Something is wrong with his/her throat and the food does not always want to go down. They grind the meat up in a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-12-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that are complete and accurately documented. An agency nurse contracted to work at the facility had a certified medication technician (CMT) document the administration of medications administered by the nurse (Resident #15). When working the floor as the charge nurse, in addition to having administrative responsibilities at the facility, the administrator failed to document the administration of medications (Residents #15 and #40). Staff failed to document a resident's complaint of pain, administration of medication or effective of the medication (Resident #39). In addition, staff documented the administration of medications that had not been administered (Residents #37, #25 and #8). The census was 44. 1. Review of Resident #15's nurse electronic medication administrator record (eMAR), reviewed on 12/3/21 at 10:29 A.M., showed all 9:00 A.M. nurse eMAR medications documented as administered by CMT A. Observation on 12/3/21 at 9:35 A.M., showed CMT A stood at the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-12-08 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement an antibiotic stewardship program that includes antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use. During the time of the survey, the infection preventionist worked as the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff) coordinator on a part time basis and had not yet implemented any aspect of the antibiotic stewardship program. The prior infection preventionist had left employment and had last implemented the program in May 2021, nearly 6 months prior. This resulted in one resident with a wound infection that required antibiotic use to not be identified by the facility as a resident on antibiotics (Resident #15). This had the potential to affect all residents who require antibiotic use. The census was 44. Review of the Facility Assessment Tool, last reviewed on 6/30/21, showed: -Average daily census: 40-50; -Services and care we offer based on our residents' needs: -Infection prevention and control: Identification and containment of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-12-08 · tag F0882 — pattern
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to designate one or more individuals with specialized training in infection prevention and control (IPC) as the infection preventionist (IP) for the facility's infection prevention control program. The census was 39. Review of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and Prevention's interim infection prevention and control recommendations to prevent COVID-19 spread in nursing homes, updated 2/2/22, showed: -IPC program: -Assign one or more individuals with training in IPC to provide on-site management of the IPC program; -This should be a full-time role for at least one person in facilities that have more than 100 residents or that provide on-site ventilator or hemodialysis services. Smaller facilities should consider staffing the IPC program based on the resident population and facility service needs identified in the IPC risk assessment. During an interview on 3/15/22 at 10:00 A.M., the administrator said the facility does not have an IP at this time. The Director of Nurses (DON) started working with the facility yesterday,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-12-08 · tag F0887 — pattern
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide COVID-19 vaccine boosters as requested for 10 residents (Residents #504, #35, #20, #505, #38, #403, #501, #23, #30, and #500). The sample was 18. The census was 39. Review of the facility's Resident Covid Vaccination Policy, updated 12/1/21, showed: -Policy: To protect the health and safety of our residents and staff, this facility strongly encourages the COVID-19 vaccination for residents; -Policy interpretation and implementation: -Residents will be offered the opportunity to receive the vaccine at no cost. The vaccination process is a two-step vaccination. If receiving the Moderna vaccine, the second vaccination will occur no earlier than 28 days from the initial vaccination. If receiving the Pfizer vaccine, the second vaccination will occur no earlier than 21 days from the initial vaccination. To be fully protected from being infected with COVID-19 you will need to receive both vaccinations and booster vaccinations when indicated; -The policy failed to provide guidance regarding COVID-19 vaccination boosters.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-08 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of verbal abuse for one resident (Residents #245). The sample was 18. The census was 39. Review of the facility's Abuse Investigation and Reporting Policy showed, undated, showed: -Policy Statement: -All reports of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property, mistreatment and/or injuries of unknown source (abuse) shall be promptly reported to local, state, and federal agencies (as defined by current regulations) and thoroughly investigated by facility management. Findings of abuse investigations will also be reported; -Role of the Administrator: -If an incident or suspected incident of resident abuse, mistreatment, neglect or injury of unknown origin is reported, the administrator will assign the investigation to an appropriate individual; -The administrator will provide any supporting documents relative to the alleged incident to the person in charge of the investigation; -The administrator will keep the resident and his/her representative (sponsor)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure weekly showers were provided to two sampled residents (Residents #34 and #30). The facility also failed to have a system in place to track resident showers to ensure they were offered. The sample was 12. The census was 44. Review of the facility's Shower/Tub Bath policy, revised October 2010, showed: -Purpose: To promote cleanliness, provide comfort to the resident and to observe the condition of the resident's skin; -Documentation: The following information should be recorded on the resident's ADL record and/or in the resident's medical record: 1. The date and time the shower/tub bath was performed; 2. The name and title of the individual(s) who assisted the resident with the shower/tub bath; 3. All assessment data (e.g., any reddened areas, sores, etc., on the resident's skin) obtained during the shower/tub bath; 4. How the resident tolerated the shower/tub bath; 5. If the resident refused the shower/tub bath, the reason(s) why…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-08 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper treatment and care to maintain good foot health for one of 12 sampled residents. The resident's feet were extremely dry with large areas of skin that flaked and peeled (Resident #30). The census was 44. Review of Resident #30's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 10/24/21, showed: -Moderate cognitive impairment; -Required extensive assistance from staff for mobility, dressing and personal hygiene; -Total dependence on staff for showers and toileting; -Foot problems: blank; -Diagnoses included high blood pressure, stroke, dementia and depression; -At risk for pressure ulcers (injuries to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin). Review of the resident's order summary report, showed an order, dated 4/1/21, for a weekly skin assessment, every Thursday evening. Review of the resident's care plan, showed no information regarding the resident's feet. Review of the resident's podiatry treatment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-08 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician's orders for weight loss prevention and nutritional needs and ensure acceptable parameters for nutritional status were maintained to prevent weight loss for three sampled residents. One resident experienced a 11.86% weight loss within a six month period and a 6.0 % weight loss within a month period (Resident #32), one resident experienced a weight loss of 8.24% within a month period (Resident #30), and one resident experienced who was fed via a tube feeding, had inconsistently documented weights and weight fluctuations (Resident #15). The census was 44. Review of the facility's Resident Census and Condition of Residents form, dated 12/2/21, showed residents with unplanned significant weight loss/gain: 12. Review of the facility's Weighing and Measuring the Resident policy, revised March 2011, showed: -The purposes of this procedure are to determine the resident's weight and height, to provide a baseline and an ongoing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-08 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary behavioral health care services for a resident's psychosocial well-being when staff did not address the resident's behavior which included picking and scratching at his/her skin to the point of drawing blood. The facility failed to develop nonpharmacological interventions to help ease the resident's anxiety (Resident #35). The facility failed to notify the physician in a timely manner. The sample was 12. The census was 44. Review of Resident #35's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 11/8/21, showed: -Cognitively intact; -No behavioral symptoms; -No skin issues; -Independent with locomotion and eating. Required supervision with toileting and personal hygiene; -Diagnoses included high blood pressure, anxiety and depression. Review of the resident's care plan, in use during the survey, showed: -Problem: Resident has reported a problem of picking at skin when he/she feels anxious; -Goal: Resident will have no evidence of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-08 · tag F0825 — isolated
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely provide or obtain the required services from an outside resource, for one of four residents sampled for rehab and restorative services (Resident #244). The resident was admitted to the facility with orders for physical and occupational therapy evaluations that were not completed timely. The census was 44. Review of Resident #244's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff), dated 11/30/21, showed: -admission date: 11/17/21; -Independent with activities of daily living (ADLs); -Diagnoses included diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, lung disease), sickle-cell anemia (a group of disorders that cause red blood cells to become misshapen and break down), anxiety and depression. Review of the resident's hospital records, dated 11/14/21 through 11/16/21, showed: -An occupational therapy progress note dated 11/15/21, showed the resident would continue to benefit from skilled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-09-06 · tag F0568 — pattern
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure generally accounting principles were followed, when they did not keep resident ledgers updated, ensure all monthly bank statements were reconciled and provide documentation regarding quarterly statements. This affected 50 residents whom the facility held their funds of which 8 were sampled (Residents #15, #16, #17, #43, #56, #49, #6 and #44). The census was 71. 1. Record review of the facility resident trust fund for the previous 12 months, showed they could only provide the months of January 2019 through July 2019 of reconciled bank statements. 2. Record review of the resident ledgers, showed the following: -Resident #15's ledger had a balance of $210.03 and had not been brought current for several months as noted by the administrator (a sticky note was on the form). It could not be determined since when, as the ledger was not dated; -Review of Resident #16's ledger had an undated ending balance of $2588.25, but showed no deposits for his/her surplus spending money since April 2019. The ledger showed no ending…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-09-06 · tag F0569 — pattern
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure discharged residents received their money from the resident trust account timely and failed to notify third party liability (TPL) within 30 days when a resident expires. This affected six residents who left the facility or expired (Residents #240, #241, #242, #243, #69 and #244). The census was 71. 1. Review of Resident #240's Checkbook balancer, showed a starting balance of $1044.28 and an ending balance of $3073.28. During an interview on [DATE] at 1:10 P.M., the administrator said he/she was discharged on [DATE]. 2. Review of Resident #241's Checkbook balancer, showed a starting balance of $129.28 and an ending balance of $164.28. During an interview on [DATE] at 1:10 P.M., the administrator said he/she was discharged on [DATE]. 3. Review of Resident #242's Checkbook balancer, showed a starting balance of $844.66 and an ending balance of $7189.66. Review of the admit/discharge form dated [DATE], showed he/she expired on [DATE]. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-09-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment by failing to maintain resident rooms, equipment, walls, air conditioner covers, and water fountains in good repair. The census was 71. 1. Review Resident #19's quarterly MDS, a federally mandated assessment instrument, dated 8/18/19, showed: -Cognitively intact; -Extensive assistance required for bed mobility, dressing, and personal hygiene. Observations on 9/3/19 at 9:37 A.M. and 2:00 P.M., 9/4/19 at 1:41 P.M. and 5:44 P.M. and 9/5/19 at 12:22 P.M., showed resident in his/her bed. The controller box for the low air loss mattress hung on the foot of the bed. The controller box on and the top cover missing, exposing the electronic wires. During an interview on 9/3/19 at 9:37 A.M., the resident said he/she does not get out of bed often. He/she was aware that the controller box at the foot of the bed was missing the cover. The wires had been exposed for over a year. During an interview on 9/6/19…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-09-06 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain a physician order for residents who require dialysis. In addition, the facility failed to provide a pre and post assessment of residents who are receiving dialysis service. The facility identified two residents as receiving dialysis (Resident #370 and #24). Both residents were included in the sample of 19 and issues were found with both. The census was 71. 1. Review of Resident #370's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by the facility staff, dated 8/25/19, showed: -admitted [DATE]; -Brief Interview for Mental status (BIMS) score: 11, showed moderately impaired cognition; -Activities of daily living: needs assistance of one staff member for grooming, bathing, dressing and hygiene. Needs assistance of two staff members for transfers and toileting; -Diagnoses included: Atrial fibrillation (irregular heart beat), coronary artery disease (the narrowing or blockage of the coronary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-09-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, by failing to ensure all controlled substances were stored under double locks and ensuring medication and food used for medication administration was stored properly. This effected one of the two medication rooms and four of five medication/treatment/insulin carts reviewed. The census was 71. 1. Observation on 9/4/19 at 10:03 A.M., the first floor medication room, showed: -Two bottles of lorazepam intensol (narcotic medication used to treat anxiety) located inside the medication refrigerator. One bottle on a shelf in the back of the refrigerator and the other bottle located on shelf on the inside door of the refrigerator, behind only one lock. The door to the medication room locked. The door to the refrigerator not locked; -One container of pudding inside the medication refrigerator. 2. Observation on 9/4/19 at 10:03 A.M., the 100 [NAME] medication cart, showed: -Two push locks on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-06 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' right to request, refuse and/or discontinue treatment and to formulate advance directives was followed by failing to ensure residents' code status listed on the physician order sheet matched the resident's code status form for two of 19 sampled residents (Residents #17 and #19). The census was 71. 1. Review of the facility's advance directive policy, updated August 2019, showed: -The code status order and the code status form must match; -All code status will be reviewed quarterly in care plan meetings and with significant change in condition; -If any code status updates or changes are made with the social services directives; social services will immediately notify nursing and the Director of Nursing (DON), and update the code status books and the care plan. 2. Review of Resident #17's medical record, showed: -A signed code status form, dated 6/17/19, with a code status of do not resuscitate (DNR, no lifesaving methods are performed); -Physician order sheet (POS), dated 9/1/19 through 9/30/19, showed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-06 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided by the facility meet professional standards of quality of care for 3 of the 19 residents sampled. The facility failed to obtain physician orders for two residents (Residents #60 and #3), failed to document an infection for one resident (Resident #3) and failed to follow a physician order by not obtaining a diagnostic test for one resident (Resident #50). The census was 71. 1. Review of Resident #60's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by the facility staff, dated 6/18/19, showed: -Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score: of 15 out of a possible 15, which indicates cognitively intact; -Diagnoses included: Cancer, anemia and paraplegia (paralysis of the legs and lower body); -Special treatments, procedures, and programs: chemotherapy was marked for both, while not a resident and while a resident. Interviews with the resident, showed: -On 9/3/19 at 10:00 A.M.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide thorough personal care for two of three care observations (Residents #53 and #66). The facility also failed to provide grooming and nail care to one resident (Resident #50) of 19 sampled residents. The census was 71. 1. Review of facility's perineal care (cleansing the front of the hips, between the legs and buttocks) policy, revised 10/2010, showed: -Purpose: To provide cleanliness and comfort to the resident, to prevent infection, skin irritation and to observe the resident's skin; -Procedure: -Wet the washcloth and apply soap or skin cleansing agent; -Wash the perineal area, wiping from the front to the back; -Separate the skin folds and wash downward from the front to the back. Wash moving from inside to the outside including the thighs, alternating from side to side and use downward strokes. Do not reuse the same washcloth or water to clean in between the skin folds; -Rinse the skin in the same direction, use fresh water and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-06 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide, based on the comprehensive assessment and care plan and the preferences of each resident, an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities designed to meet the interests and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident by failing to provide documented one to one individual activities to three of 19 sampled residents. In addition, the facility failed to adequately document the activities provided and the length of time of the activity (Residents #19, #52, and #66). The census was 71. 1. Review of the facility's activity calendar, showed one to one activities was scheduled on the following dates and times: -Monday through Friday at 5:30 P.M.; -Saturday and Sunday at 11:30 A.M. 2. Review of the Resident #19's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by staff, dated 5/18/19, showed: -Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), a screening tool used to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing for two of six resident's investigated for pressure ulcers resident's (Residents #19 and #169). The sample was 19. The census was 71. 1. Review Resident #19's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 8/18/19, showed: -Cognitively intact; -Extensive assistance required for bed mobility, dressing, and personal hygiene; -Diagnoses included high blood pressure, multiple sclerosis (MS, neurological disorder), depression, osteomyelitis (bone infection), bacterial infection, and vitamin D deficiency; -One stage VI (full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon or muscle. Slough or eschar may be present on some parts of the wound bed. Often includes undermining and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-06 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with limited range of motion receives appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion and/or prevent further decrease in range of motion by failing to follow the physician's order for restorative therapy, for one of 19 sampled resident (#50). The census was 71. Review of Resident #50's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 6/28/19, showed: -Moderate cognitive impairment; -Extensive one person physical assist required for bed mobility, transfer, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene; -No restorative therapy provided; -Diagnoses included anemia, high blood pressure, blood clots and diabetes. Review of the resident's physician order, dated 6/1/18, showed he/she will receive restorative nursing program 3 times a week for maintaining function. Review of the resident's care plan, dated 6/25/19, showed: -Problem: History of falls due to cognitive loss, weakness and incontinence; -Interventions: Encourage to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents environment remains as free of accident hazards as possible and each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents by failing to ensure medications were secured and not accessible to residents, ensure proper transfer techniques were used during resident transfers, and failed to follow physician's orders for tubi-grips (tubular bandage) used to prevent injury, for three of 19 sampled residents (Residents #15, #53 and #50). The census was 71. 1. Review of the facility's storage of medication policy, revised 4/2017, showed: -Policy statement: The facility shall store all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure and orderly manner; -Policy interpretation and implementation: -The nursing staff shall be responsible for maintaining medication storage and preparation areas in a clean and safe manner; -Drugs shall be stored in an orderly manner. Each resident's medications shall be assigned…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-06 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status and offer a therapeutic diet when there is a nutritional problem and failed to follow physician's orders and provide additional meal supplements as ordered for one resident with a significant weight loss (Resident #44) out of 19 sampled residents. The census was 71. Review of Resident #44's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 6/22/19, showed: - Severe cognitive impairment; -Set up help and supervision required with eating; -Wheelchair for mobility; -Weight loss of 5% or more over the last month or 10% or more over the last six months; -No swallowing disorders; -Weight 120 pounds (lbs.); -Nutritional approach: None; -Diagnoses included high blood pressure, diabetes, osteoporosis (weak and brittle bones), dementia and depression. Review of the resident's recorded weights, showed: -On 2/7/19 at 2:20 P.M., 135.4 lbs.; -On 3/19/19 at 1:25 P.M., 132.4 lbs.; -On 4/22/19 at 10:00 A.M., 129.6…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections by failing to follow their policy for one resident who was on isolation out of 19 sampled residents (Resident #67). The census was 71. Review of the facility's Isolation-Notices of Transmission-Based Precautions policy, showed: -Policy Statement: -Appropriate isolation notices will be used to alert staff of the implementation of transmission-based precautions, while protecting the privacy of the resident; -Policy interpretation and implementation: -When transmission-based precautions are implemented, an appropriate sign (example: color coded) will be placed at the entrance/doorway of the resident's room. Signs will be used to alert staff of the implementation of transmission-based precautions and to alert visitors to report to the nurses' station before entering the room, while respecting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2024-02-15 · tag F0680 — widespread
    Ensure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and policy review, the facility failed to have a qualified Activities Director to oversee the activities department for all 76 current residents in the facility. This failure could result in all residents not being offered or participating in a resident centered and life enriching activity program. Findings include: Review of the undated policy titled, Activity Program - Staffing reflects in part 1. Our activity program is under the direct supervision of a qualified professional who: a. Is qualified therapeutic recreation specialist or an activities professional who: 1. Is licensed or registered, if applicable, by the state in which practicing; and 2. Is eligible for certification as a therapeutic recreation specialist or as an activities professional by a recognized accrediting body on or after October 1, 1990; OR b. Has two (2) years of experience in a social or recreational program within the last five (5) years, one (1) of which was full-time in a patient activities program in a health care setting; OR c. Is a qualified occupations therapist or occupational…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2021-12-08 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to post the nurse staffing information in a prominent place, readily accessible to residents and visitors. In addition, the staffing sheets maintained by the facility did not include the facility name, total number and the actual hours worked by category of staff, or the resident census. The census was 44. Observation on 12/1/21 at 1:22 P.M., on 12/2/21 at 4:00 A.M., on 12/3/21 at 5:07 A.M., and on 12/6/21 at 11:45 A.M., showed no nurse staffing information posted in a prominent place. The staffing sheets were located behind the nurse's station. During an interview on 12/6/21 11:49 A.M., the certified nursing assistant (CNA)/staffing coordinator said she does not post any nursing hours. She makes the schedule, which she keeps on a clipboard at the nurse's station. This is the form that would be used if someone needed to look back to see nursing hours worked. Review of the staffing sheets provide for the dates of 11/19/21 through 11/30/20, showed they did not include the facility name, did not consistently include…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2021-12-08 · tag F0888 — widespread
    Ensure staff are vaccinated for COVID-19
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to fully implement their staff vaccination policy for COVID-19 by failing to obtain all the required information for one of one staff who had a medical exemption. The facility had 100% of employees fully vaccinated or with an approved exemption and had no residents with COVID-19 infections within the last four weeks. The census was 39. Review of the facility's COVID-19 Vaccine Policy, undated, included the following: -Scope: This policy applies to all employees and all non-employee personnel who perform in-person services for the organization, attend in-person organization meetings, or visit organization facilities. -Contractors and non-employees vaccination requirement: Prior to performing any in-person services for the organization, attending any in-person meetings or visiting any organization facilities, contractors, vendors and non-employees must present proof they are fully vaccinated against COVID-19; -Medical exemptions: This documentation must specify which of the COVID-19 vaccines are clinically contraindicated for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2019-09-06 · tag F0577 — widespread
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents have the right to examine the results of the most recent survey of the facility conducted by Federal or State surveyors and any plan of correction in effect with respect to the facility by failing to post in a place readily accessible to residents, and family members and legal representatives of residents, the most recent plan of correction for the survey of the facility. In addition, the facility failed to post notice of the availability for any individual to review upon request the reports with respect to any surveys, certifications, and complaint investigations made respecting the facility during the 3 preceding years, and any plan of correction in effect with respect to the facility. The census was 71. Observation on 9/3/19 at 8:55 A.M., on 9/4/19 at 10:56 A.M., on 9/5/19 at approximately 12:00 P.M. and 9/6/19 at 7:45 A.M., of the front entrance of the facility, showed a sign posted for the most recent survey conducted by federal and state surveyors is located in the table drawer in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2019-09-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff treated residents in a respectful manner by posting resident care signs in a resident room (Resident #36) and failed to knock on residents' doors before entering. In addition, the facility staff failed to speak in a dignified manner in the presence of residents. The census was 71. 1. Review of Resident #36's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 6/8/19, showed: -Clear speech at times; -Usually understands; -Rarely/never understood; -Diagnoses included heart failure, hypertension (high blood pressure), pneumonia, hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol), seizure disorder, diabetes and depression. Observations on 9/4/19 at 1:33 P.M. and at 5:18 P.M., 9/5/19 at 7:40 A.M. and 9/6/19 at 9:42 A.M., showed an uncovered two page sign on the wall, over the head of the resident's bed, stating: -Safe swallow strategies for Resident #36; -He/she is on a pureed diet with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2019-09-06 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident assessment accurately reflected the residents' status for three of four residents who had a resident assessment completed after the start of hospice services (Residents #28, #17 and #66). The census was 71. 1. Review of Resident #28's medical record, showed the resident received hospice services since 7/19/18. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 8/19/19, showed: -Received hospice services; -Does the resident have a condition or chronic disease that may result in a life expectancy of less than 6 months: No. 2. Review of Resident #17's medical record, showed he/she had been admitted to hospice services on 6/17/19. Review of the resident's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed: -Received hospice services; -Does the resident have a condition or chronic disease that may result in a life expectancy of less than six months of less: No. 3.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$209,790 in federal fines across 4 penalties. 3 Medicare payment denials on record.

  • $12,438 — penalty dated 2025-10-24
  • $40,717 — penalty dated 2025-03-04
  • $139,544 — penalty dated 2024-05-02
  • $17,091 — penalty dated 2024-02-15
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-03-12 for 29 days
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-04-10 for 23 days
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-06-14 for 1 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to OPCO SKILLED MANAGEMENT — 66 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.3-1.3 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.2-1.2 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.7-0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.3-0.3 vs chain
The other 65 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
1 of 5Bluebird Wellness And RehabilitationSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Brentwood Place ThreeDallas, TX 1 of 5Broadway Nursing & RehabilitationSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5Cameron Nursing CenterCameron, MO 1 of 5Carmel Hills Wellness & RehabilitationIndependence, MO 1 of 5Casa Arena Healthcare LLCAlamogordo, NM 1 of 5Casa Maria HealthcareRoswell, NM 1 of 5Forest Park Nursing & RehabilitationDallas, TX 1 of 5Fort Worth Wellness & RehabilitationFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Glenview Wellness & RehabilitationNorth Richland Hills, TX 1 of 5Highland Pines Nursing HomeLongview, TX 1 of 5Ivy Creek Wellness & RehabilitationWaco, TX 1 of 5Las Cruces Village Nursing & Rehabilitation LLCLas Cruces, NM 1 of 5Maple Grove Wellness & RehabilitationFenton, MO 1 of 5Mineola Gardens Wellness & RehabilitationMineola, TX 1 of 5Pine Grove ManorSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Rehab Of Kansas City SouthKansas City, MO 1 of 5The Hillcrest Of North DallasDallas, TX 1 of 5West Side Campus Of CareWhite Settlement, TX 1 of 5Willow Ridge Wellness & RehabilitationFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Willowcreek Wellness & RehabilitationFlorissant, MO 2 of 5Arbor Lake Nursing & Rehabilitation, LLCFort Worth, TX 2 of 5Aztec HealthcareAztec, NM 2 of 5Betty Dare Wellness & Rehabilitation LLCAlamogordo, NM 2 of 5Blue Springs Wellness & RehabilitationBlue Springs, MO 2 of 5Cypress Springs Wellness & RehabilitationMount Vernon, TX 2 of 5Fiesta Park Wellness & RehabilitationAlbuquerque, NM 2 of 5Hilltop At Blue River, TheKansas City, MO 2 of 5La Vida Buena HealthcareLas Vegas, NM 2 of 5Los Alamos Wellness & RehabilitationLos Alamos, NM 2 of 5McGregor Wellness & RehabilitationMc Gregor, TX 2 of 5Monarch Springs Wellness & RehabilitationUniversity City, MO 2 of 5Northrise Wellness & RehabilitationLas Cruces, NM 2 of 5Prescott Valley Nursing & RehabilitationPrescott Valley, AZ 2 of 5Prescott Village Nursing & RehabilitationPrescott, AZ 2 of 5Rehabilitation Center Of Independence, TheIndependence, MO 2 of 5San Antonio Wellness & RehabilitationSan Antonio, TX 2 of 5Skyline Nursing CenterDallas, TX 2 of 5Sunny Springs Nursing & RehabSulphur Springs, TX 2 of 5White Acres Wellness & RehabilitationEl Paso, TX

Showing 40 of 65; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
WILDFLOWER HEALTHCARE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL100%since 07/01/2024
BLOOMING WILLOW PARTNERS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/01/2024
DERHOBEN TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/01/2024
PAS B SOL TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/01/2024
321 GASCONADE STREET MO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTERESTsince 07/01/2024
GARETZ, DAVIDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 07/01/2024
THORDSEN, DENISEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2024
DAVIDOVICH, NIVIndividualTRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2024
HAGINS, ELIZABETHIndividualTRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2024
KAPLAN, MORDECHAIIndividualTRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2024
MINDLE, ADAMIndividualTRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2024
STERNSHEIN, JENNIFERIndividualTRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2024
ZIMMERMAN, CAROLINEIndividualTRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$4.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-22.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$653K
Related-party expense11% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 89%Medicare 3%Other / private 8%

About 89% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $653K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$237per resident / day
operating cost
$7,205per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$194per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Missouri
$6,741/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,400/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265672. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-02-15, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next