No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

San Antonio Wellness & Rehabilitation

1 Heartland Drive, San Antonio, TX 78247 · For profit - Corporation · 154 certified beds · (210) 653-1219 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0603) — cited Sep 20251 immediate-jeopardy citation$104,627 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (35% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0603), cited Sep 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (51) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $104,627 in federal fines (most recent 2023-12-03)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
16019 Nacogdoches Rd · (210) 949-9702 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
15038 Nacogdoches Rd · (210) 646-7045 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
15184 Judson Rd · (210) 653-9398 · Call to confirm hours
Park
15060 Judson Rd · (301) 613-1869 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased11.5%15.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.5%3.0%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.3%0.8%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%2.4%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.7%3.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened13.5%14.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication16.2%18.0%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.5%3.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control15.2%13.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table11.7%9.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.2%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.9%88.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission33.4%25.7%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit15.4%12.3%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.942.171.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.072.061.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 137 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

55.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
53.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.37U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.13hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.16hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 53.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 79 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 64% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF55.5%CMS range 45.5–64.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.9%CMS range 8.6–16.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge53.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge45.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge50.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay4.2%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.4%CMS range 4.5–10.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.891.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.38
RN hours/ resident / day
1.01
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.05
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.45
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.28
RN hoursweekends
35.4%
Total nursing turnover
37.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 154 beds and averages 117.3 residents a day — about 76% occupied, or roughly 37 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.45 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.38 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.05 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.07 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.60 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.43 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 35% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-20)
5
at the previous standard inspection (2024-11-08)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

51 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 40 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · K2023-12-03 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents are free of any significant medication errors for 1 of 12 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for significant medication errors, in that: The facility did not administer Resident #1's recommended doses for dexlansoprazole [a medication used to reduce stomach acidity and prevent stomach ulcers] and sucralfate [a medication used to coat the lining of the stomach and intestinal ulcers by forming a barrier over the ulcers and protecting the ulcer from further injury] from 11/11/2023 to 11/27/2023, resulting in the resident being sent out to the hospital on [DATE]. These failures resulted in the identification of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 12/1/23 at 5:37 p.m. While the IJ was removed on 12/2/23 at 9:48 p.m., the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of pattern and a severity level of actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy because the facility needed to monitor their corrective actions. This deficient practice…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for nutrition services.The facility failed to ensure the commercial bar soda/juice gun dispenser was free from dirt and debris buildup.The facility failed to ensure that the DNS, Cook, and Dietary Aide were wearing hair restraints during food preparation during the initial brief tour of the kitchen.The facility failed to ensure that the DNS, Cook, and Dietary Aide were wearing hair restraints appropriately during follow-up visits to the kitchen. The facility failed to ensure the DNS was practicing hand hygiene when exiting and reentering the kitchen during follow-up visits to the kitchen. The facility failed to ensure LVN-L was using proper hygienic practices and serving food under sanitary conditions during observation of the first meal upon entrance into the facility. These failures could lead to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles and stored in locked compartments for 2 of 3 residents (Residents #36 and #21) and 1 of 11 medication carts reviewed for storage. 1. Resident #36's insulin Glargine (Lantus) Solos Flex Pen for diabetes had no open date, found inside 500 and 600-hall nursing cart on 02/18/2026. 2. Resident #21's insulin Novolog 70/30 Flex Pen for diabetes had no open date, found inside 200-hall nursing cart on 02/18/2026. 3. The facility failed to ensure 1 of 11 medication carts was kept locked or under direct observation of authorized staff in an area where residents could access it on 2/19/2026. These failures could place residents at risk of clinically significant adverse consequences and not having therapeutic effects by using old insulins. The findings were: 1. Record review of Resident #36's face sheet, dated 02/20/2026, revealed Resident #36…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was incontinent of bladder and bowel received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore continence to the extent possible for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #4) reviewed for incontinence care. When LVN-A was providing incontinent care to Resident #4 on 02/19/2026, LVN-A did not clean the resident's left side area of buttock. These failures could place residents who required incontinence care at risk for cross contamination and the development of new or worsening urinary tract infections. The findings included: Record review of Resident #4's face sheet, dated 02/20/2026, revealed Resident #4 was a [AGE] year old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE], and re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of epilepsy (happens as a result of abnormal electrical brain activity also known as a seizure), obstructive and reflux uropathy (a blockage in urinary tract), benign…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-20 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure parenteral fluids were administered consistent with professional standards for 1 (Resident #6) of 1 resident reviewed for intravenous fluids. LVN-B flushed the medication port of Resident #6's central line (inserted central catheter: used to deliver medications and other treatments directly to the large central veins near the heart) with 10 ml normal saline when administering antibiotic dose. However, the physician order said, Flush IV (intravenous) line with 5 ml normal saline before and after medication administration. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk for receiving diluted medication. Findings included: Record review of Resident #6's face sheet, dated 02/20/2026, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female, originally admitted on [DATE], and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of acute hematogenous osteomyelitis (infection that primarily affects the most vascularized regions of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care, was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 (Residents #77) of 4 residents reviewed for respiratory care. Resident #77's CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure) mask was not covered in a plastic bag when it was not used on 02/17/2026. This failure could affect residents with oxygen therapy and could lead them to lack of care including possible infection by not following infection control.The findings included: Record review of Resident #77's face sheet, dated 02/20/2026, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female and originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of cellulitis of left lower limbs (skin infection), chronic pulmonary embolism (sudden blockage in a lung artery), anemia (not enough red blood cells), and sleep apnea (breathing stops and restarts many times while sleeping). Record review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 (400-500-600-hall medication aide cart) out of 6 medication carts and 1 (Resident #73) out of 3 residents reviewed for pharmacy services. 1. There was one bottle of Nutricia Pro-Stat expired 01/02/2026 found inside 400-500-600-hall medication aide cart on 02/18/2026. 2. Facility nurses opened Resident #73's insulin pen (Glargine-Lantus) on 01/07/2026 and used the insulin on 02/18/2026. However, the label of the insulin indicated Discard 28 days after opening, and 28th day was 02/04/2026. This failure could place residents at risk of inaccurate drug administration and not having appropriate therapeutic effects. The findings included: 1. Observation on 02/18/2026 at 1:40 p.m. revealed there was one bottle of Nutricia Pro-Stat found inside…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development of communicable diseases and infections for 2 (Resident #106 and #132) of 24 residents reviewed for infection control practices. 1. Medication Aide-C measured Resident #106's blood pressure without cleaning the blood pressure cuff on 02/19/2026. 2. When CNA-F was providing peri care to Resident #132 on 02/19/2026, CNA-F changed her gloves without washing or sanitizing her hands. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for cross contamination and infections.The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #106's face sheet, dated 02/20/2026, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male and admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of aftercare following amputation (removal of a body part), heart failure (the heart can't pump enough oxygen-rich blood to meet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain clinical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices that were complete and accurately documented for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accuracy of medical records.LVN N failed to document Resident #1's wound care treatment on Resident #1's medication administration record for December 26, 2025.This deficient practice could affect residents whose records were maintained by the facility and could place them at risk for errors in care and treatment.Findings included:Record review of Resident #1's undated face sheet revealed Resident #1 was a [AGE] year old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included encephalopathy (a disease in which the function or structure of the brain is affected, typically caused by infection, tumor, or stroke) and dementia (a general term for impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions).Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0559 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to receive written notice, including the reason for the change, before the resident's room or roommate in the facility was changed for one of one resident (Resident #1) reviewed for room change. The facility did not provide Resident #1 with a written notice prior to a room change or the right to refuse on 06/16/2025. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for being displaced without notice and/or reason to accommodate other individuals.Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 09/10/2025, revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Resident #1 was listed as her own responsible party with [family member] listed as financial Power of Attorney and Emergency Contact #1. Record review of Resident #1's Medical Diagnoses, undated and accessed 09/10/2025, revealed diagnoses including acute (present or experienced to a severe or intense degree) on chronic systolic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0603 — failed to not confine residents against their will — isolated
    Protect each resident from separation (from other residents, his/her room, or confinement to his/her room).
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from involuntary seclusion and any physical restraint not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms for one of six (Resident #1) residents reviewed for involuntary seclusion.The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 met criteria to remain on the secure unit per secure unit criteria.This failure could place residents who resided on the secure unit at risk for feelings of isolation and anxiety.Findings included:Record review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 09/10/2025, revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Resident #1 was listed as her own responsible party with [family member] listed as financial Power of Attorney and Emergency Contact #1. Record review of Resident #1's Medical Diagnoses, undated and accessed 09/10/2025, revealed diagnoses including acute (present or experienced to a severe or intense degree) on chronic systolic (congestive) heart failure (a long-lasting condition…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 40 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medical records, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, were complete and accurately documented for two of six residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for medical records accuracy. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's orders for facility admission and for secure unit admission were reflected in the active orders. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's orders for facility admission and for secure unit admission were reflected in the active orders. These deficient practices could affect residents whose records are maintained by the facility and could place them at risk for errors in care and treatment.Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 09/10/2025, revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Resident #1 was listed as her own responsible party with [family member] listed as financial Power of Attorney and Emergency Contact #1. Record review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the events that caused the allegation involved abuse, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials including to the State Survey Agency where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities in accordance with State law through established procedures for 2 of 6 residents (Residents #12, and #18) reviewed for freedom from abuse and misappropriation.1. The facility failed to report the incident of misappropriation on 5.2.25 for Resident # 12 missing a gold diamond necklace. 2. The facility failed to report the incident of alleged abuse on 05/01/2025 for Resident #18.These failures could put the residents at risk of abuse, allegations of abuse not being…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-02 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have evidence that all allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, were thoroughly investigated for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #18) reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility did not investigate an incident in which Resident #18 made a grievance that a staff member was rough with her and did not stop perineal care when requested. This failure could place residents at risk for abuse/neglect and could lead to a diminished quality of life and psychosocial harm. The findings included:Record review of Resident #18's Face Sheet, dated 07/02/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old resident with an initial admission date of 12/16/2023 and diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe), Depression, and morbid obesity. Record review of Resident #18's Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Plan, dated printed 07/01/2025, reflected Resident #18, consistently denies…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-02 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment including both the comprehensive and quarterly review assessments to reflect the current condition for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #15) reviewed for care plan revisions.The facility failed to ensure Resident #15's care plan was comprehensive and updated to reflect Resident #15 had an incident of resident-to-resident aggression. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not receiving appropriate interventions to meet their current needs. The findings included:Record review of Resident #15's face sheet dated 07/02/2025 revealed an [AGE] year-old admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included unspecified dementia (group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning), anxiety disorder, and personal history of covid-19. Record review of Resident #15's most recent admission MDS assessment dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible and each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 2 of 3 patios reviewed for entrapment and lack of supervision. 1. The secured enclosed patio by the 100-300 hall dining room was accessed by a door that would allow residents, staff, and the public to exit to the secured enclosed patio but would lock behind anyone and would prevent access back into the dining room. 2. The secured enclosed patio by the 400-600 hall dining room was accessed by a door that would allow residents, staff, and the public to exit to the secured enclosed patio but would lock behind anyone and would prevent access back into the dining room. This failure could place residents, staff, and the public at risk for entrapment. The findings included: During an observation of the facility during initial rounds on 11/05/2024 from 09:00 to 06:00 PM revealed 3 secured patios. One enclosed secured patio was located by the 100-300 hall dining…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen observed. The facility failed to ensure dietary staff used proper hand hygiene during meal preparation. This failure could place residents who received meals and/or snacks from the kitchen at risk for food borne illness. The findings included: Observation on 11/07/2024 at 12:08 p.m. revealed the DA carried a bag of hamburger buns from the pantry, placed them on the counter, after she placed the bag down, pulled back plastic wrap from a sandwich on a plate reached up, grabbed a knife by the blade from the magnetic knife holder on the wall, cut the sandwich in half and then placed the plastic wrap back over the sandwich. The DA did not stop to remove gloves and wash her hands or change gloves. Observation on 11/07/2024 at 12:12 p.m. revealed the DA while wearing gloves she went into the pantry, brought back a loaf of bread, opened the bread removed the bread from the bag placed it on a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality for 1 of 6 Residents (Resident #48) reviewed for dignity. CNA F walked into Resident #48's room without knocking and while Surveyor and Resident #48 were having a discussion about his medical concerns. This deficient practice could affect any resident and contribute to residents feeling like their feelings, privacy or dignity does not matter. The findings were: Record review of Resident #48's face sheet, dated 11/8/24, revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Diabetes Mellitus with Diabetic Neuropathy and Major Depressive Disorder, recurrent, moderate, Record Review of Resident #48's annual MDS, dated [DATE] revealed his BIMS was 14 reflecting minimal cognitive impairment, he did not have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-08 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to voice grievances to the facility or other agency or entity that hears grievances without discrimination or reprisal and without fear of discrimination or reprisal. Such grievances include those with respect to care and treatment which has been furnished as well as that which has not been furnished, the behavior of staff and of other residents, and other concerns regarding their LTC facility stay for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #4) reviewed for grievances. The facility failed to create a greience for Resident #4 who made a grievance to LVN D, LVN C, CNA A, and The BOM alleging she did not receive medications on Sunday 10/27/2024. This failure could place residents at risk for not having their grievances heard and or resolved. The findings included: A record review of Resident #4's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #4 was an [AGE] year-old female admitte d on 09/19/2022 for long term…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-08 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure each resident received, and the facility provided food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #16) reviewed for mechanical soft diet needs. 1. The facility failed to follow the physicians' orders and the Speech Language Pathologist's (SLP) recommendations for Resident #16's mechanical soft diet and served Resident #16 potato chips on 11/05/2024 for lunch. 2. The facility failed to follow the physicians' orders and the Speech Language Pathologist's (SLP) recommendations for Resident #16's mechanical soft diet and served Resident #16 potato chips on 11/05/2024 for dinner. This failure could place residents at risk for harm by aspiration of food into the lungs due to swallowing difficulties. The findings included: A record review of Resident #16's admission record dated 11/05/2024, revealed an admission date of 09/04/2024 with diagnoses which included dysphagia oropharyngeal phase…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #1) reviewed for infection control, in that: The facility failed to ensure LVN A changed her gloves when moving from a dirty to clean task and failed to use appropriate hand hygiene between glove changes when she provided incontinent care to Resident #1. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for infection due to improper care practices. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 10/15/24 revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cognitive communication deficit, profound intellectual disabilities, and benign prostatic hyperplasia without lower urinary tract symptoms. Record review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-16 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — pattern
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure they assisted residents in obtaining routine dental care for 1 of 5 Resident (Resident #2) whose records were review for dental services. Nursing staff failed to refer Resident #2 for dental services since her admission; for 6 months. This deficient practice could affect residents in need of dental services and result in the development of infections and a decline in physical condition The findings were: Review of Resident #2's face sheet, dated 1/16/24, revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Dementia and Cognitive Communication Deficit. Review of Resident #2's annual MDS assessment, dated 12/22/23, revealed her BIMS score was severely cognitively impaired and she was dependent for oral care. Review of Resident #2's Care Plan, revised on 12/20/23 revealed she had a communication problem and one of the interventions was to anticipate needs. Further review revealed Resident #2 had a self-care ADL…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure in response to allegations of abuse, were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, when the events that caused the allegation involved abuse for 1 of 5 Residents (Resident #1) whose records were reviewed for abuse. CNA A reported to nursing staff that CNA B slapped Resident #1 on the right upper thigh. Nursing staff failed to follow the chain of command and report it to the ADM right away which delayed the ADM in reporting the allegation of abuse to the State Survey Agency within 2 hours. This deficient practice could affect any resident and contribute to further resident abuse. The findings were: Review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 1/16/24, revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Dementia and Personal History of (healed) traumatic fracture. Review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 12/12/23 with a BIMS score of 2 reflective of severe cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good oral hygiene for 1 of 5 Residents (Resident #2) whose records were reviewed for adl care. Nursing staff failed to clean Resident #2's lips and brush her teeth after breakfast. This deficient practice could affect dependent residents and contribute to poor oral hygiene, tooth decay, infections and decline in physical condition The findings were: Review of Resident #2's face sheet, dated 1/16/24, revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Dementia and Cognitive Communication Deficit. Review of Resident #2's annual MDS assessment, dated 12/22/23, revealed her BIMS score was severely cognitively impaired and she was dependent for oral care. Review of Resident #2's Care Plan, revised on 12/20/23 revealed she had a communication problem and one of the interventions was to anticipate needs.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-16 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who is incontinent of bladder receives appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore continence to the extent possible for 2 of 4 resident (Residents #3 and #20) reviewed for incontinent care, in that: 1. While providing incontinent care for Resident #3, CNA H did not pull back Resident #3's foreskin. 2. While providing incontinent care for Resident #20, CNA G used a back to front motion to clean Resident #'s buttocks. CNA G did not clean Resident #20's anal area. This deficient practice could place residents at-risk for infection and skin break down due to improper care practices. The findings were: 1. Record review of Resident #3's face sheet, dated 01/16/2024, revealed an admission date of 05/04/2021, and a readmission date of 12/03/2023, with diagnoses which included: Hemiplegia (Paralysis of one side of the body),Dementia (decline in cognitive abilities), Anxiety (A group of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-16 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that nurse aides were able to demonstrate competency in skillss and techniques to provide nursing and related services for 2 of 4 residents (Residents #3 and #20) by 2 of 4 certified staff (CNA G and CNA H) reviewed for competent staff, in that: 1. While providing incontinent care for Resident #3, CNA H did not pull back Resident #3's foreskin. 2. While providing incontinent care for Resident #20, CNA G used a back to front motion to clean Resident #'s buttocks. CNA G did not clean Resident #20's anal area. These failures could place residents at risk for not receiving nursing services by adequately trained and certified aides and could result in a decline in health and infection. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #3's face sheet, dated 01/16/2024, revealed an admission date of 05/04/2021, and a readmission date of 12/03/2023, with diagnoses which included: Hemiplegia (Paralysis of one side of the body),Dementia…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an Infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for infection control, in that: While providing incontinent care for Resident #3, CNA H touched the fall matt on the floor with her bare hands and did not wash her hands before putting her gloves on and starting providing care. CNA H did not change gloves and sanitize or wash her hands before touching Resident #3's clean brief. These failures could place residents at-risk for infection due to improper care practices. The findings include: Record review of Resident #3's face sheet, dated 01/16/2024, revealed an admission date of 05/04/2021, and a readmission date of 12/03/2023, with diagnoses which included: Hemiplegia (Paralysis of one side of the body),Dementia (decline in cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident, for 4 of 12 residents (Resident #4, #5, #10, and #11) reviewed for pharmacy services in that: 1. The facility did not ensure LVN C did not administer Resident #4's medicated eye drops Brimonidine Tartrate-Timolol [a medication used to treat high fluid pressure in the eye] and Dorzolamide HCl-Timolol [a medication used to treat high fluid pressure in the eye] 5 minutes apart, as per physician's orders. 2. The facility did not ensure LVN C did not administer Resident #5's complete morning dose of furosemide [a medication used to reduce extra fluid in the body caused by conditions such as heart failure, liver disease, and kidney disease]. 3. The facility did not ensure Resident #10 and Resident #11 received their 8:00 a.m. medications within the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles in locked compartments and permit only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for 1 of 12 residents (Resident #5) reviewed for storage of drugs, in that: While preparing Resident #5's morning medications, LVN C left 1 of Resident #5's furosemide pill unattended and unsecured on top of her medication cart. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of medication misuse and diversion. The findings were: Record review of Resident #5's face sheet, dated 12/1/23, revealed Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of cellulitis [inflammation of the skin] of left lower limb, unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition, muscle weakness (generalized), heart failure, unspecified, and peripheral vascular disease [a circulatory condition in which narrowed blood vessels reduce blood flow to the limbs],…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-03 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that are-accurately documented for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for accurate medical records in that: LVN A initialed off on Resident #1's MAR indicating she had provided the medication when she had not provided the medication. This deficient practice could result in misinformation about professional care provided. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's electronic face sheet dated 01/09/2024 reflected she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included: displaced bimalleolar fracture of right lower leg (type of ankle fracture), hypothyroidism (when the thyroid gland does not make enough thyroid hormones to meet the body's needs), and cardiomyopathy (disease of heart that causes the heart muscle to lose ability to pump blood). Record review of Resident #1's care plan dated 01/09/2024 reflected Focus .Pain and Discomfort .Interventions .Pain medication as ordered. Record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the drugs and biologicals used in the facility must be labeled and stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and include the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions and the expiration date when applicable and for 3 (200 Hall, 300 Hall and 600 Hall) of 6 medication carts in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure expired medications were not found on the 200 Hall and 300 Hall medication carts. 2. The facility failed to ensure the nurse and medication aide medication carts for 600 Hall were not left unattended and unlocked. These deficient practices affect residents who receive medications and could result in less potent or adverse effects and drug diversion. The findings included: 1. Observation on 10/06/2023 at 11:17 a.m. of medications in Hall 300 medication cart revealed a bottle of Retaire PM lubricant eye ointment for dry eyes with an expiration date of 02/2023. Interview on 10/06/2023 at 11:20 a.m. with MA E, revealed a new resident came in and he brought his own…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-06 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the menu was followed for 1 of 1 meal observed in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure all residents received [NAME] Peas with Sauteed Onions with their lunch meal on 10/03/2023. 2. The facility failed to ensure [NAME] Peas with Sauteed Onions was prepared by the recipe. These failures could place residents at risk for dissatisfaction, poor intake, and diminished quality of life. The findings were: Record review of the facility's Day 10 menu for Tuesday 10/03/23 lunch meal revealed Meatloaf with Tomato Sauce, Scalloped Potatoes, [NAME] Peas with Sauteed Onions, Bread Slice/Margarine, Chocolate Pudding, Beverage of Choice, Water were to be served. Record review on 10/03/2023 at 12:32 p.m. revealed a daily menu board in the dining room that listed Meatloaf with Tomato Sauce, Scalloped Potatoes, [NAME] Peas with Sauteed Onions, Bread Slice/Margarine, Chocolate Pudding, Beverage of Choice, Water for the lunch meal. The menu revealed no indication that [NAME] Peas without Sauteed Onions were to be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food nutrition services, in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure [NAME] Y's hairnet was covering his mustache while preparing for lunch. 2. The facility failed to ensure that staff didn't wear facial jewelry while preparing foods. 3. The facility failed to maintain the cleanliness of the ice machine found within the kitchen. These failures could place residents at risk for food contamination and foodborne illnesses. The findings included: 1. Observation on 10/03/23 at 11:03 a.m. revealed [NAME] Y standing by the stove preparing lunch without his mustache covered by a hairnet. During an interview and observation on 10/03/23 beginning at 11:14 a.m., Director of Nursing Services (DNS) told [NAME] Y to cover his mustache and DNS revealed that [NAME] Y's hairnet that covered his mustache and beard sometimes fell down his face, exposing his mustache, because the hair net is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-06 · tag F0941 — pattern
    Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program that includes effective communications for direct care staff members.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide effective communications mandatory training for 8 of 24 employees (MA L, CNA M, CNA N, CNA Q, CNA R, CNA B, ADON W and ADON X) reviewed for training, in that: The facility failed to ensure effective communication training was provided to MA L, CNA M, CNA N, CNA Q, CNA R, CNA B, ADON W and ADON X. This failure could place residents at risk of miscommunication and social isolation due to lack of staff training. The findings included: Review of Facility Staff Roster, undated, revealed: MA L - date of hire - 10/03/2022 CNA M - date of hire - 08/16/2018 CNA N - date of hire - 09/23/2022 CNA Q - date of hire - 08/16/2022 CNA R - date of hire - 07/26/2019 CNA B - date of hire - 12/13/2019 ADON W - date of hire - 07/10/2020 ADON X - date of hire - 05/15/2019 During a record review and interview with the HR Personnel on 10/06/2023 at 8:15 p.m., the HR Personnel revealed each month the corporate office would send down which trainings staff were to be completed and the DON would ensure trainings were completed. The HR…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-06 · tag F0942 — pattern
    Ensure that staff members are educated on resident rights and facility responsibilities to properly care for its residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the required education on the rights of the resident and the responsibilities of a facility to properly care for its resident for 8 of 24 employees (MA L, CNA M, CNA N, CNA Q, CNA R, CNA B, ADON W and ADON X) reviewed for training, in that: The facility failed to ensure education on the rights of the resident and the responsibilities of a facility to properly care for its residents was provided to MA L, CNA M, CNA N, CNA Q, CNA R, CNA B, ADON W and ADON X. This failure could affect residents and place them at risk of being uninformed due to lack of staff training. The findings included: Review of Facility Staff Roster, undated, revealed: MA L - date of hire - 10/03/2022 CNA M - date of hire - 08/16/2018 CNA N - date of hire - 09/23/2022 CNA Q - date of hire - 08/16/2022 CNA R - date of hire - 07/26/2019 CNA B - date of hire - 12/13/2019 ADON W - date of hire - 07/10/2020 ADON X - date of hire - 05/15/2019 During a record review and interview with the HR Personnel on 10/06/2023 at 8:15 p.m., the HR Personnel…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-06 · tag F0944 — pattern
    Conduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) training that outlines and informs staff of the elements and goals of the facility's QAPI program for 8 of 24 employees (MA L, CNA M, CNA N, CNA Q, CNA R, CNA B, ADON W and ADON X) reviewed for training, in that: The facility failed to ensure that quality assurance and performance improvement training was provided to MA L, CNA M, CNA N, CNA Q, CNA R, CNA B, ADON W and ADON X. This failure could place residents at risk for injury or improper care due to a lack of training. The findings were: Review of Facility Staff Roster, undated, revealed: MA L - date of hire - 10/03/2022 CNA M - date of hire - 08/16/2018 CNA N - date of hire - 09/23/2022 CNA Q - date of hire - 08/16/2022 CNA R - date of hire - 07/26/2019 CNA B - date of hire - 12/13/2019 ADON W - date of hire - 07/10/2020 ADON X - date of hire - 05/15/2019 During a record review and interview with the HR Personnel on 10/06/2023 at 8:15 p.m., the HR Personnel revealed each month the corporate office would send…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-06 · tag F0946 — pattern
    Provide training in compliance and ethics.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the required compliance and ethics training for 8 of 24 employees (MA L, CNA M, CNA N, CNA Q, CNA R, CNA B, ADON W and ADON X) reviewed for training requirements, in that: The facility failed to ensure compliance and ethics training was provided to MA L, CNA M, CNA N, CNA Q, CNA R, CNA B, ADON W and ADON X. This failure could affect residents and place them at risk of poor care or victimization due to lack of staff training. The findings included: Review of Facility Staff Roster, undated, revealed: MA L - date of hire - 10/03/2022 CNA M - date of hire - 08/16/2018 CNA N - date of hire - 09/23/2022 CNA Q - date of hire - 08/16/2022 CNA R - date of hire - 07/26/2019 CNA B - date of hire - 12/13/2019 ADON W - date of hire - 07/10/2020 ADON X - date of hire - 05/15/2019 During a record review and interview with the HR Personnel on 10/06/2023 at 8:15 p.m., the HR Personnel revealed each month the corporate office would send down which trainings staff were to be completed and the DON would ensure trainings were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-06 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — pattern
    Provide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide mandatory effective behavioral health training for 8 of 24 employees (MA L, CNA M, CNA N, CNA Q, CNA R, CNA B, ADON W and ADON X) reviewed for training, in that: The facility failed to ensure effective behavioral health training was provided to MA L, CNA M, CNA N, CNA Q, CNA R, CNA B, ADON W and ADON X. This failure could place residents at risk of not attaining or maintaining their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being due to lack of staff training. The findings included: Review of Facility Staff Roster, undated, revealed: MA L - date of hire - 10/03/2022 CNA M - date of hire - 08/16/2018 CNA N - date of hire - 09/23/2022 CNA Q - date of hire - 08/16/2022 CNA R - date of hire - 07/26/2019 CNA B - date of hire - 12/13/2019 ADON W - date of hire - 07/10/2020 ADON X - date of hire - 05/15/2019 During a record review and interview with the HR Personnel on 10/06/2023 at 8:15 p.m., the HR Personnel revealed each month the corporate office would send down which trainings staff were to be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-06 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to promote resident self-determination through support of family choice for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #56) reviewed for resident rights. The facility did not follow Resident #56's and the family's request to not have resident be tube fed. This failure could place residents at risk for feelings of depression, lack self-determination and decreased quality of life. The findings included: Record review of Resident #56's electronic face sheet dated 10/05/23 revealed Resident #56 was initially admitted on [DATE] and was re-admitted [DATE]. His diagnoses included unspecified dementia, expressive language disorder, aphasia(loss of ability to understand or express speech), dysphagia(impairment in the production of speech), and unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition. Record review of Resident #56's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 09/21/23, revealed that BIMS should not be conducted and staff assessment for mental status was that resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-06 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to accurately reflect the resident's status on the quarterly MDS for one (Resident #25) of 8 residents reviewed for MDS assessments in that: The facility failed to properly code Resident #25's quarterly MDS assessment a 3 for always incontinent instead of 9 for not rated since he had an indwelling urinary catheter. This deficient practice could result in missed or inaccurate care. The findings included: Record review of Resident #25's electronic face sheet dated 10/04/2023 reflected he was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included: unspecified focal traumatic brain injury (localized damage and includes contusion and lacerations), hemiplegia (one sided paralysis), aphasia (loss of ability to understand or express speech, caused by brain damage), and neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder (nerves and muscles do not work together well and may result in the bladder not filling or emptying correctly). Record review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-06 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care for 1 (Resident #95) out of 16 residents reviewed for care plans in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #95 had a baseline care plan created within 48 hours when she was readmitted to the facility from the hospital. This deficient practice affects residents who are readmitted or new admissions and could result in decreased quality of care. The findings included: Record review of Resident #95's electronic face sheet dated 10/06/2023 reflected she was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted from the hospital on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included: cerebrovascular disease (a group of conditions that affect blood flow and the blood vessels in the brain), vascular dementia (problems with reasoning, planning, judgment,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that include measurable objectives and time frames to meet residents' mental, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment and to ensure that the comprehensive care plan described the services that were to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, including the right to refuse treatment for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #56) reviewed for care plans, in that: The facility failed to implement Resident #56's comprehensive person-centered care plan to address ADL self-care of eating. This failure could affect residents who have care areas not addressed by the care plan by not having their needs met and putting them at risk of not receiving appropriate care. The findings included: Record review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to review and revise the comprehensive person-centered care plan for 2 (Resident #74 and #101) out of 16 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #74's comprehensive care plan Interventions/Tasks were revised to reflect interventions taken after falls have occurred. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #101's comprehensive care plan was revised within the required timeframe. These failures could affect residents who are assessed and have care plans and places them at risk for not receiving necessary care. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #74's electronic face sheet dated 10/06/23 reflected he was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included muscle wasting and atrophy, difficulty in walking, unspecified lack of coordination, other mechanical complication of surgically created age-related osteoporosis (a medical condition in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that a resident receives care consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure ulcers and does not develop pressure ulcers unless the individual's clinical condition demonstrates that they were unavoidable for 1 (Resident #25) of 4 residents reviewed for pressure sore prevention and management in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #25's heel protectors were on his feet during the 3 days of observations. This deficient practice affects residents at risk for skin breakdown and could result in pressure sores. The findings included: Record review of Resident #25's electronic face sheet dated 10/04/2023 reflected he was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included: unspecified focal traumatic brain injury (localized damage and includes contusion and lacerations), hemiplegia (one sided paralysis), aphasia (loss of ability to understand or express speech, caused by brain damage),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-06 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident who is incontinent of bladder receives appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for 1 ( Resident #25) out of 3 residents reviewed for indwelling urinary catheters in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #25 had a leg strap to secure his indwelling urinary catheter tubing. The facility failed to ensure C NA B did not lift Resident #25's urinary catheter bag and tubing with urine in it above the resident's bladder when he assisted with incontinent care for the resident. This deficient practice affects residents with indwelling urinary catheters and could result in urinary tract infections and trauma to the stoma site. The findings included: Record review of Resident #25's electronic face sheet dated 10/04/2023 reflected he was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included: unspecified focal traumatic brain injury (localized damage and includes contusion and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-06 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure nurse aides can demonstrate competency in skills and techniques necessary to care for resident's needs, as identified through resident assessments and described in the plan of care for 2 residents (#25 and #92) of 2 residents observed for incontinent care and catheter care in that: 1. The facility faled to ensure C NA A did not wipe Resident #25's catheter tubing toward the site and not away to prevent contamination and C NA B raised the urinary drainage bag above the resident's bladder twice when turning him side to side. 2. The facility failed to ensure CNA B did not raide Resident #25's urinary drainage bag above the resident's bladder twice when turning him side to side. 3. The facility failed to ensure C NA A wiped Resident #92 thouroughly cleaned the Resident's perineal area and then turned the resident over and cleaned her anal area from back to front once when she performed incontinent care. These deficient practices…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-06 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to keep information that is resident-identifiable from the public for one Hallway (600) of 6 hallways observed and failed to maintain medical records in accordance with professional standards and practices for 1 resident (#25) out of 8 resident records reviewed in that: 1. The facility failed to prevent RN G from having identifiable resident information on top of her medication cart unattended. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #25's heel protectors were not initialed on his nursing MAR and that were never applied to his feet. These deficient practices could affect all residents whose records are maintained by the facility and could place them at risk for violation of privacy and errors in care and treatment. The findings included: 1. Observation on 10/05/2023 at 5:12 p.m. of the 600 Hall medication cart, sitting in the hallway outside of the nurse's station, unattended, revealed a printed list of resident's names by room number,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 ( Residents #228 and #244) of 7 residents observed for infection control in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure MA I did not pull plastic drinking cups from the side of her cart by sticking her finger in one pulling it apart from the others. MA I stacked up her medication cups with medications in them and carried them with her fingers around the rims when she brought them in to Resident #228. 2. The facility failed to ensure RN G did not contaminated the medication cup by placing her finger in the medication cup with medications prior to giving them to Resident #244. This deficient practice had the potential to affect residents in the facility by placing them at risk of contracting pathogens that could lead to infection. The findings included: 1. In an observation during…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for infection control in that: During Resident #1's incontinent care, CNA A did not perform hand hygiene between glove changes. This deficient practice could affect residents who require incontinent care and place them at risk for infection. The findings were: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 9/20/23, revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of other sequelae [a condition following a previous disease or injury] of cerebral infarction [a disruption in the brain's blood flow], unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition, unspecified dementia [a general term for impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions], unspecified severity,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-23 · tag F0732 — isolated
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to post nurse staffing information to include the facility name, current date, total number and actual hours worked by registered nurses, licensed practical or licensed vocational nurses, certified nurse aides per shift and the resident census on a daily basis for one of two days (08/21/2023) reviewed for nurse staffing information. The facility did not post the required current nurse staffing information on 08/21/2023. This failure could place residents at risk of not having access to information regarding staffing data and the facility census. Findings include: Observation on 08/21/2023 at 03:37 p.m., revealed a document labeled Daily Associates Posting dated 08/18/2023, was posted on a wall next to the facility receptionist's desk and above the electronic sign-in machine. During an interview on 08/21/2023 at 06:58 p.m., the ADMIN stated the posted nurse staffing document was dated 08/18/2023. The ADMIN revealed she was unaware if the nurse staffing information was posted in another location at the facility.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure, in accordance with State and Federal laws, all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments under proper temperature controls, and permitted only authorized personnel to have access to the keys on for 1 medication cart (500-hall Medication Cart) of 6 medication carts (500-hall Medication Cart) reviewed for medication storage. The facility failed to ensure the medication cart was locked when unattended. This failure could place residents at risk of having access to unauthorized medications and/or lead to possible harm or drug diversions. Findings include: Observation on 08/21/2023 at 05:25 p.m. revealed an unlocked medication cart on 500-hall, with the lock not pushed in and no facility staff standing next to the cart. Multiple medication drawers were unsecured which contained multi-patient bottles which included over the counter bottles and prescription pill packs. The drawer with controlled substances was found to be accessible but controlled substances were in a separate internal, locked…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$104,627 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $104,627 — penalty dated 2023-12-03
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-12-30 for 11 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to OPCO SKILLED MANAGEMENT — 66 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.2-0.2 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 51.7+0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.3-0.3 vs chain
The other 65 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
1 of 5Bluebird Wellness And RehabilitationSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Brentwood Place ThreeDallas, TX 1 of 5Broadway Nursing & RehabilitationSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5Cameron Nursing CenterCameron, MO 1 of 5Carmel Hills Wellness & RehabilitationIndependence, MO 1 of 5Casa Arena Healthcare LLCAlamogordo, NM 1 of 5Casa Maria HealthcareRoswell, NM 1 of 5Forest Park Nursing & RehabilitationDallas, TX 1 of 5Fort Worth Wellness & RehabilitationFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Glenview Wellness & RehabilitationNorth Richland Hills, TX 1 of 5Highland Pines Nursing HomeLongview, TX 1 of 5Ivy Creek Wellness & RehabilitationWaco, TX 1 of 5Las Cruces Village Nursing & Rehabilitation LLCLas Cruces, NM 1 of 5Magnolia Wellness CenterSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Maple Grove Wellness & RehabilitationFenton, MO 1 of 5Mineola Gardens Wellness & RehabilitationMineola, TX 1 of 5Pine Grove ManorSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Rehab Of Kansas City SouthKansas City, MO 1 of 5The Hillcrest Of North DallasDallas, TX 1 of 5West Side Campus Of CareWhite Settlement, TX 1 of 5Willow Ridge Wellness & RehabilitationFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Willowcreek Wellness & RehabilitationFlorissant, MO 2 of 5Arbor Lake Nursing & Rehabilitation, LLCFort Worth, TX 2 of 5Aztec HealthcareAztec, NM 2 of 5Betty Dare Wellness & Rehabilitation LLCAlamogordo, NM 2 of 5Blue Springs Wellness & RehabilitationBlue Springs, MO 2 of 5Cypress Springs Wellness & RehabilitationMount Vernon, TX 2 of 5Fiesta Park Wellness & RehabilitationAlbuquerque, NM 2 of 5Hilltop At Blue River, TheKansas City, MO 2 of 5La Vida Buena HealthcareLas Vegas, NM 2 of 5Los Alamos Wellness & RehabilitationLos Alamos, NM 2 of 5McGregor Wellness & RehabilitationMc Gregor, TX 2 of 5Monarch Springs Wellness & RehabilitationUniversity City, MO 2 of 5Northrise Wellness & RehabilitationLas Cruces, NM 2 of 5Prescott Valley Nursing & RehabilitationPrescott Valley, AZ 2 of 5Prescott Village Nursing & RehabilitationPrescott, AZ 2 of 5Rehabilitation Center Of Independence, TheIndependence, MO 2 of 5Skyline Nursing CenterDallas, TX 2 of 5Sunny Springs Nursing & RehabSulphur Springs, TX 2 of 5White Acres Wellness & RehabilitationEl Paso, TX

Showing 40 of 65; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
FRIO HOSPITAL DISTRICTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 01/01/2024
RUFF, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
HEARTLAND POST ACUTE LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2024
GARETZ, DAVIDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2024
GURWITZ, SOLOMONIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/25/2025
HAGINS, ELIZABETHIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/31/2025
KAPLAN, ESTHERIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/25/2025
KAPLAN, MORDECHAIIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/31/2025
MINDLE, ADAMIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/25/2025
UNGER, JEFFREYIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/25/2025
1 HEARTLAND DRIVE TX, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2024
CONTINUUM REHAB GROUP LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2024
GIBRALTAR TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2024
MAGNOLIA REALTY, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2024
MILLENNIAL ACQUISITIONS, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2024
MONTGOMERY SKY TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2024
OPCO CA SKILLED MGMT INC.OrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2024
OPCO TEXAS SKILLED MGMT LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2024
OREGON REALTY, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2024
SCOOPER REALTY, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2024
WINDSOR SQUARE REALTY, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2024
GONZALES, JAVIERIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 12/06/2023
SILVA, LUISIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 03/11/2010

13 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$4.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-3.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$298K
Related-party expense7% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 51%Medicare 6%Other / private 44%

This home reported $298K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$302per resident / day
operating cost
$9,190per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$292per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 455762. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next