Fiesta Park Wellness & Rehabilitation
8820 Horizon Boulevard NE, Albuquerque, NM 87113 · For profit - Corporation · 105 certified beds · (505) 998-1551 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (31% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2026
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (38) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $39,025 in federal fines (most recent 2026-06-22)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- about 17% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 10.6% | 11.3% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.7% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.9% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.9% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 2.0% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.6% | 3.5% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 16.9% | 11.7% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 8.8% | 14.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.7% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.3% | 5.2% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 21.1% | 20.0% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 3.3% | 14.5% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.5% | 1.1% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 93.1% | 86.4% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 22.2% | 22.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 17.7% | 15.7% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.76 | 1.65 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 3.99 | 2.81 | 1.80 | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
64.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 361 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 67.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 143 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.43 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 73% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 64.5%CMS range 59.3–68.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.1%CMS range 7.7–12.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 67.8% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 62.2% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 60.8% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 98.9% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 97.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.1%CMS range 4.3–10.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.86 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 105 beds and averages 101.7 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.64 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.36 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.23 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.17 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.84 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.42 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 31% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
38 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 24 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-06-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide adequate oversight of nursing students in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 (R #1) of 1 (R #1) resident reviewed, which resulted in a nursing student providing R #1 a meal tray despite R #1 having an active nothing by mouth (NPO) dietary order. If staff serve food to a resident with an NPO order, then the resident is at risk for aspiration, choking, respiratory distress, and other preventable adverse outcomes. The findings are: A. Record review of the facility's nursing student educational agreement, dated 02/01/24, revealed the following: The student responsibilities include following the facility's administrative policies, procedures, rules, and regulations, and providing services to the facility's patients under the direct supervision of a faculty member provided by the college or a facility provided preceptor. The facility's responsibilities include retaining ultimate responsibility for patient care and services,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2023-08-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that one (R #1) of 3 (R #1-3) residents reviewed for elopement (an unauthorized departure of a patient from an around-the-clock care setting) were free from accidents/hazards by not accurately assessing R #1 for risk and not providing adequate supervision by not: 1. Accurately assess R #1 for elopement risk upon admission from an acute care facility for worsening neurocognitive decline and confusion, paranoid delusions, and attempts to leave the acute care facility; 2. Reassess R #1 for elopement risk after exhibiting increased wandering behavior and actual wandering into facility parking lot on [DATE]; 3. Notify appropriate facility staff and administration of R #1's elopement attempt on [DATE]; 4. Implement interventions and supervision to prevent reoccurrence of elopement for R #1 after an attempted elopement on [DATE]; and 5. Prevent R #1 from eloping from the facility on [DATE]. This deficient practice likely resulted in R #1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-06-22 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from abuse for 1 (R #2) of 1 (R #2) resident, when a facility Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) engaged in unwanted physical contact with the resident and ate food from the resident's meal tray. This deficient practice resulted in R #2 experiencing fear, anxiety, tearfulness, sleep disturbance, emotional distress, and concern regarding retaliation. The findings are:A. Record review of R #2's Minimum Data Set (MDS; a standardized assessment used to evaluate a resident's clinical status and care needs) discharge assessment, dated 06/14/26, revealed:R #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of a displaced fracture of the lower end of the left femur (the large bone extending from the hip to the knee), impaired mobility, and weakness. R #2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS; a standardized cognitive screening assessment) score of 15, indicating the resident was cognitively intact.R #2 utilized a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-04-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from neglect for 1 (R #131) of 1 (R #131) resident, when:The facility van driver failed to completely secure R #131's wheelchair in the van prior to transport.The facility van driver failed to contact emergency medical services (EMS) after the resident sustained a fall with injury during transport to an appointment. If the facility fails to properly secure residents in the transport van and contact EMS providers after a resident experiences a fall with injury, then residents are at risk for delayed treatment or worsening injury. The findings are:A. Record review of the facility's Vehicle Safety Program Policy, undated, revealed the policy directed authorized employees to operate company vehicles in a safe manner and ensure all occupants used seatbelts prior to moving the vehicle. The policy directed staff to ensure all wheelchairs were tied down securely before moving the vehicle. The policy directed staff to check for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to submit the required incident summary report for multiple days to the State Agency (SA) for 1 (R #1) of 1 (R #1) resident. If the facility does not submit the incident summary to the State Agency without delay, then the State Agency cannot appropriately triage (review) the allegation for further investigation. The findings are: A. Record review of the facility's abuse prevention program policy, revised 10/24/22, revealed the facility will promptly and thoroughly investigate all reports of abuse, mistreatment, neglect, injuries of unknown origin, or criminal acts. The policy states that staff must report allegations of abuse or neglect that do not result in serious bodily injury no later than 24 hours after forming the suspicion. B. Record review of R #1's face sheet revealed R #1 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses:Aspiration pneumonia (pneumonia caused by inhaling something other than air into the lungs).Respiratory…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-04-20 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the outdoor trash dumpster was covered to minimize odors and prevent pests or rodents. If staff fail to keep outdoor trash bins closed, the environment may become unsanitary, increasing the risk of pest infestation and disease transmission to residents.The finding are:A. On 04/14/26 at 2:14 PM, during an observation, an outside trash dumpster had its' lid left open, exposing waste material to the environment. B. On 04/20/26 at 9:47 AM, during an observation, an outside trash dumpster was unattended and had its' lid left open, making waste material accessible to the environment. C. On 04/20/26 at 9:50 AM, during an interview, the Dietary Manager (DM) stated the outside dumpster should remain closed when not in use. He stated leaving the dumpster open could attract pests.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-20 · tag F0552 — patternEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to properly complete consent forms for 5 (R #3, R #12, R #13, R #74, and R #129) of 5 (R #3, R #12, R #13, R #74, and R #129) residents, when: Vaccination consent forms were not signed by residents or resident representatives for R #12, R #74, and R #129.Psychotropic medication (medication used to treat mental health conditions) consent forms were not signed by residents or resident representatives for R #3 and R #13. This deficient practice is likely to result in residents and/or their representatives not being consulted and informed of the risks and benefits of medications and treatments being provided to them. The findings are: Vaccination Consents: R #12: A. Record review of R #12's face sheet revealed R #12 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #12's vaccination consent forms, undated, revealed the form was incomplete and without information present in the signature, date, and time sections indicating vaccination consent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-20 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS; a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff) was accurate for 2 (R #4 and R #7) of 2 (R #4 and R #7) residents reviewed for MDS accuracy, when: R #4's MDS indicated she had clear speech when she was non-verbal (a person that does not speak). The facility staff did not complete R #7's mood assessment section of the MDS.This deficient practice is likely to result in a failure to provide adequate care and treatment of residents' needs.The findings are: R #4: A. Record review of R #4's face sheet revealed an admission date of 11/21/2023 and the following diagnoses: Dementia (a group of conditions characterized by impairment of at least two brain functions, such as memory loss and judgment), Cognitive impairment (a decline in cognitive function), Dysphagia (difficulty or discomfort in swallowing, as a symptom of disease), Muscle wasting and atrophy (a decrease in muscle mass and strength). B.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-20 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement an adequate baseline care plan (minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for a resident immediately upon their admission to the facility) for 1 (R #11) of 1 (R #11) residents reviewed for baseline care plans, when: R #11's baseline care plan was incomplete and inaccurate due to the baseline care plan failing to include foley catheter (a thin, sterile tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) use with interventions. If the facility fails to develop and implement an adequate baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission for residents, then staff may lack necessary guidance to provide appropriate care which could lead to an adverse event (undesirable experience, preventable or non-preventable, that causes harm to a resident due to medical care or lack of medical care). The findings are:A. Record review of R #11's face sheet revealed R #11 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the proper storage and security of medications located in the medication carts, when: The 200-unit narcotic (controlled medication used for the management of pain) box located in a medication cart was left unlocked. Medications were pre-poured (the practice of preparing and pouring medications in advance of their scheduled administration time, which carries significant risks) prior to administration and left in the medication cart located in the 400-unit. A medication tablet was left out of the packaging and on the floor in the 200-unit. This deficient practice is likely to increase the risk of unauthorized access to medications, medication diversion, contamination, and administration of medications to the wrong resident. The findings are: Medication Cart Narcotic Box: A. On 04/15/26 at 1:46 PM, during an observation, the narcotic box located in one of the two medication carts in the 200-unit behind the nurse's station was found to be unlocked and could be easily opened, allowing access to the narcotic medications…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure care plan interventions were implemented for 1 (R #5) of 1 (R #5) resident reviewed for falls. If the facility does not ensure care plan interventions for falls are implemented, then residents are at risk for continued falls and potential injury.The findings are:A. Record review of R #5's face sheet revealed R #5 was originally admitted into the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #5's nursing progress notes revealed the following: R #5 had a Change in Condition (CIC; a comprehensive re-evaluation of physical, mental, or psychosocial status that occurs when baseline functioning is altered or indicates a new, ongoing risk) assessment completed for a fall on 04/07/26.R #5 had a CIC assessment completed for a fall on 04/09/26. C. Record review of R #5's Care Plan, dated 04/10/26, revealed the following:R #5 was at risk for falls related to generalized weakness and impaired mobility.Dated 04/07/26, new fall interventions were added to R #5's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-20 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff revised the care plan for 1 (R #74) of 1 (R #74) resident reviewed, when:Facility staff failed to update R #74's plan of care to include R #74's use of a Hoyer lift (equipment used to safely transfer residents with limited mobility) for transfers. This deficient practice is likely to result in residents' care and needs not being addressed if care plans are not updated. The findings are: A. Record review of R #74's face sheet revealed admission date of 12/30/2025 with the following diagnoses: Spinal stenosis (narrowing of the space surrounding the spinal cord causing pressure and pain), Muscle weakness (reduction in the power exerted by muscles), Need for assistance with personal care and activities of daily living (ADL; activities related to personal care such as bathing, showering, dressing, walking, toileting, and eating). B. Record review of R #74's care plan, dated 12/30/2025, revealed R #74's Hoyer lift use was not included in her care plan. C. On 04/14/2026 at 10:40 AM, during an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-20 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide quality care that meets professional standards for 1 (R #25) of 1 (R #25) resident reviewed, when staff failed to: Update R #25's physician orders to reflect a new dialysis (a medical treatment which filters waste and excess fluid from the blood) schedule. This deficient practice is likely to result in residents not maintaining their optimal health as planned by their medical provider. The findings are:A. Record review of R #25's face sheet revealed R #25 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnosis: End stage renal disease (ESRD; chronic irreversible kidney failure) B. Record review of R #25's active physician orders, dated 12/22/25, revealed R #25's dialysis is scheduled for Monday, Wednesday, and Friday at 6:00 am. C. Record review of R #25's care plan, dated 12/22/25, revealed R #25's days of dialysis treatment is Monday, Wednesday, and Friday at 6:00am. D. On 04/14/26 at 10:00 am, during an interview, R #25 stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a safe and sanitary environment to prevent the transmission of infectious agents and communicable diseases for 1 (R #10) of 3 (R #10, #52, and #62) residents, when the facility: Failed to prevent a urinary catheter (a thin, flexible tube which drains urine from the bladder) bag and tubing from touching the floor.These deficient practices have the potential to expose staff and other residents to infectious diseases. The findings are: A. Record review of R #10's face sheet revealed R #10 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #10's care plan, dated 04/13/26, revealed R #10 used a foley catheter (a thin, sterile tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) due to Neurogenic bladder (a condition in which nerve damage or neurological disorders disrupt the normal communication between the brain, spinal cord, and bladder, leading to loss of bladder control). C. On 04/15/26 at 11:23 AM, during an observation,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 24 citations
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-19 · tag F0645 — patternPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR; a federal requirement to help ensure individuals who have a mental disorder or intellectual disabilities are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care) was accurate for 9 (R #2, R #3, R #5, R #6, R #7, R #8, R #9, R #10, and R #11) out of 9 (R #2, R #3, R #5, R #6, R #7, R #8, R #9, R #10, and R #11) residents reviewed for PASARR accuracy. This deficient practice has the potential to result in the facility not providing the services needed for residents who are identified in the screening process as needing additional care and services. The findings are: R #2:A. Record review of R #2's Face Sheet revealed the following: admission date of 09/02/25,Diagnosis of major depressive disorder (a mental health disorder characterized by persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities, causing significant impairment in daily life). B. Record review of R #2's PASARR Level 1 Screening, dated 09/02/25, revealed staff documented the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-19 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a safe environment for all residents in the 200-unit when staff failed to ensure the facility oxygen (O2) storage room was secured to prevent unauthorized access. This deficient practice has the potential to lead to residents experiencing avoidable accidents.The findings are: A. Record review of the facilities Oxygen Administration Policy, dated 06/2020, revealed the following: Oxygen cylinders are to be secured in a cylinder cart or bracket at all times, Oxygen stored in clean, dry locations. B. On 02/18/26 at 1:59 pm, observation of the facility's 200-unit oxygen room revealed the following: The oxygen storage room keypad door lock was without power and nonoperational. The keypad screen remained blank and did not activate when touched. Further observation revealed occupants in the area could open the oxygen storage room door without entering an access code. Oxygen cylinders (portable medical oxygen tanks) sat on the floor and were not stored in the designated oxygen cylinder rack. C. On 02/18/26…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-19 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS; a federally mandated comprehensive assessment of a resident's functional, medical, psychosocial and cognitive assessment completed by facility staff) was accurate for 1 (R #2) of 1 (R #2) resident reviewed for MDS accuracy. This deficient practice could result in failure to provide adequate care and treatment of the resident's needs. The findings are:A. Record review of R #2's face sheet revealed R #2 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Guillain-Barre syndrome (a rare condition where the body's immune system attacks the nerves),Epilepsy (a long-term brain disorder that causes repeated, unprovoked seizures due to abnormal electrical activity in the brain),Depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest).R #2 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #2's Change in Condition (CIC) form, dated 10/16/25, revealed R #2 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents where give prior notice and equal accommodations during a remodeling project for 4 (R #1, #2, #3, and #4) out of 4 residents. These deficient practices could result in residents feeling as if they were unimportant, restricted, did not have freedom to make their own choices, and did not have privacy. The findings are: A. On 01/15/26 at 1:15 pm, observation revealed the 400 hallway was under renovation. Multiple resident rooms did not have furniture or flooring, and construction workers were present laying flooring in the empty rooms. Residents were present in the 400 hallway and some resided in rooms 423, 424, 425, and 426. B. On 01/15/26 at 12:50 pm, during an interview, R #4 stated staff kicked me out of my room yesterday, and he had to sit in his wheelchair from 7:40 am to 6:00 pm. He stated the staff did not give him any notice, and they just told me to get out. The resident stated the facility made him leave his room so they could remove the carpet and replace it with flooring. R #4 stated he did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-16 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe and comfortable environment for all residents and occupants during a remodeling project when staff failed to:- Maintain proper ventilation of construction flooring adhesive odors.- Maintain the means of egress (a continuous and unobstructed way of travel from any point in the building or structure to a public way) throughout the facility. If staff fail to maintain a safe environment, then the residents could find themselves in an emergency situation which could endanger their health and safety. The findings are:Construction Adhesive Fumes A. Record review of the facility's Safety Plan for the floor renovation project, dated 09/16/2025, revealed the following: - The resident units affected were Gila, [NAME], and Pecos. - Potential issues included unpleasant odors due to the materials in use. - Staff were instructed to contain the aerosol dust/debris with ventilation as needed, close doors where applicable to provide…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to complete an initial skin assessment for 1 (R #1) of 3 (R #1, #2 and #3) residents reviewed for skin assessments, during the initial admission. If the facility fails to complete a skin assessments then facility is unable to provide proper care and treatment for the residents. The findings are: A. Record review of the State Agency complaint received on 05/13/25 stated that R #1 had been discharged AMA (against medical advice) from facility on 05/12/25 for physical abuse by facility staff and had been transported by [name of transport service] to [name of local hospital] at 6:00 pm with bruising, swollen genitals and penile bleeding along with various bruising on the body. B. Record review of R #1's facesheet revealed R #1 was admitted on [DATE]. C. On 05/14/25 at 11:17 am during a telephone interview with R #1's daughter, she stated that she believed her father was physically abused by the facility staff due to the amount of bruising present when she took…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medical records were updated with necessary documents and are accurate for 1 (R #4) of 1 (R #4) resident reviewed, when the facility failed to update and upload hospital discharge orders into the electronic medical record (EMR). This deficient practice is likely to result in residents not receiving accurate care and having an inaccurate medical record. The findings are: A. Record review of R #4's face sheet revealed she was admitted on [DATE]. B. On 05/14/25 at 10:23 AM, during an interview with R #4, she stated that intravenous (IV) antibiotics had been discontinued earlier than her hospital discharge orders indicated. She explained that the antibiotics should have continued for four weeks after her hospital discharge. C. On 05/15/25 at 10:28 AM, during an interview with the Nurse Practitioner (NP) #1, she stated that R #4 had been on IV antibiotics for a severe infection. She noted that R #4's hospital discharge orders dated 03/25/25 clearly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-01-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store and serve food under sanitary conditions when staff failed to ensure: 1. Food items were labeled and dated in the kitchen refrigerator and freezer. 2. Food items were stored off the kitchen floor and appropriately in the dry storage. 3. Dietary staff were wearing appropriate hairnets while in the kitchen. 4. Frozen meats were thawed in a safe manner (under running water and not in stagnate water). These deficient practices are likely to affect all 107 residents listed on the resident census list provided by the Administrator on 01/06/25 and are likely lead to foodborne illnesses in residents if food is not being stored properly and safe food handling practices are not adhered to. The findings are: A. On 01/06/25 at 9:59 am, observation of the kitchen revealed the following: - Six plastic bags of diced potatoes were not dated and stored in the kitchen refrigerator. - Six plastic bags of salad mix (iceberg lettuce, carrots, and purple cabbage) were not dated and stored in the kitchen refrigerator. - Two plastic packages…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff revised the care plan for 2 (R #'s 11 and 112) of 2 (R #'s 11 and 112) residents reviewed when staff failed to: 1. Conduct a quarterly care plan meeting as required for R #11 in accordance with his admission date and Minimum Data Set (MDS)assessment. 2. Update R #11's plan of care to include Libre2 ([NAME] based glucose monitor embedded in the skin) use for diabetic management. 3. Update R #112's plan of care to include oxygen (O2) use. These deficient practices are likely to result in residents' care and needs not being addressed if care plans are not updated. The findings are: Care Plan Meeting: R #11: A. Record review of R #11's face sheet revealed R #11 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #11's social service progress notes dated 10/06/24 revealed R #11's Emergency Contact (EC) was notified of the scheduled care plan meeting, but it did not contain a date of the schedule care plan meeting. C. Record review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-16 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a quality care that meets professional standards for 1 (R # 11) of 1 (R #11) resident when the facility failed to: 1. Communicate with a provider (Physician Assistant- PA, Nurse Practitioner- NP) the discontinuation of a medication (sodium zirconium- medication that binds potassium and treats Hyperkalemia- elevated potassium). 2. Review and implement R #11's Nephrologist (a doctor who specializes in diagnosing and treating kidney conditions) medication recommendations. 3. Follow physician orders to utilize R #11's Libre2 ([NAME] based glucose monitor embedded in the skin) when performing diabetic management. These deficient practices are likely to result in residents not receiving the appropriate medications and treatments if facility staff is not communicating with providers, ordering the appropriate medications for residents, and following physician orders. The findings are: Provider Communication and Medication Implementation: A. Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-16 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis (clinical purification of blood as substitute for normal kidney functioning) facility regarding dialysis care and services for 1 (R #51) of 1 (R #51) resident reviewed for dialysis. If the facility is unaware of the status, condition or complications that arise during dialysis treatment, then residents are likely to not receive the appropriate monitoring and care they need. The findings are: A. Record review of the facility's dialysis care policy dated 06/2020, revealed facility nursing staff will utilize dialysis communication records or similar forms to convey information regarding dialysis care to the dialysis provider, and keep those documents in the residents Electronic Health Record (EHR). B. Record review of R #51's face sheet revealed R #51 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. C. Record review of the physician order dated 12/11/24, revealed R #51 received dialysis on Mondays,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-16 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that medications were administered with an error rate less than 5%. Medications were observed being administered to 2 (R #61 and R #97) of 4 (R #61, R #97, R #192, and R #365) During observation there were 26 medications administered with 13 medication errors observed. This resulted in a medication error rate of 50%. If medications are not administered at the scheduled ordered times, the treatment may be less effective and residents will receive less than optimal care. The findings are: A. On 01/09/24 at 8:40 am during an observation of R #61's medication administration, Certified Medication Aide (CMA) #1 administered the following medications: -Aspirin (an over the counter medication administered to manage blood coagulation and pain) 81 mg (milligrams). -Furosemide (a prescribed medication to reduce fluid and water from the body) 80 mg. -Gabapentin (a prescribed medication to reduce pain) 100 mg. -Sertraline (a prescribed medication to mange symptoms of depression) 25 mg. B. Record review of R #61's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain accurate and complete records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for 7 (R #'s 34, 54, 69, 193, 194,195, and 196) of 7 (R #'s 34, 54, 69, 193, 194,195, and 196) residents. The facility failed to properly document that pharmacist recommendations were reviewed by the facility providers. this could adversely impact resident medication needs by not have accurate information. A. Record review of the monthly pharmacist reviews dated December 2023 to December 2024 of R #'s 34, 54, 69, 193, 194,195, and 196 medications revealed the following recommendations: -Note to Attending Physician/Prescriber dated 12/21/23 for R #34 recommended Paroxetine (medication for symptoms of depression) 40 mg (milligrams) and Trazodone (medication for symptoms of depression and sleep disturbance) 50 mg be reviewed for benefit versus risk and consider for periodic dose reduction trials. The response to the recommendation stated that patient has a good response to treatment and requires dose for conditions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to investigate an allegation of missing money for 1 (R #121) of 1 (R #121) resident reviewed for missing money. This deficient practice is likely to result in resident financial hardship. The findings are: A. On 01/14/25 at 2:07 PM during an interview with R #121, she stated she had $150.00 in a green baggie under her mattress and it was missing. She further stated that she did not remember the exact date that the money went missing but it was sometime in December 2024. She did not file a formal grievance but she verbally reported the missing money to the Administrator. B. Record review of the facility's incidents and grievances for the months of August 2024 through January 2025 revealed there was not any documentation of R #121's missing money. C. On 01/15/25 at 2:04 PM during an interview with the Administrator, she stated she was aware of the alleged missing money. She was told about the missing money by R #121. She further stated she had asked R #121 if she wanted to file a police report or file a formal grievance in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0624 — isolatedPrepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide sufficient preparation for 1 (R #81) of 1 (R #81) resident reviewed by not ensuring that referral for services had been received, accepted and was scheduled to provide care for the resident upon her discharge home. This deficient practice could likely result in resident not receiving needed services and having to navigate referral process for services unassisted. The findings are: A. Record review of R #81's Face Sheet dated revealed R #81 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including: -Spina Bifida (a birth defect that causes the spinal column to not develop properly usually leaving an open hole to the spinal cord) with hydrocephalus (fluid collecting at the base of the brain). -Pressure Ulcer (a wound that develops over a boney area of the body) of Sacral (lower back just above the buttocks) Region. Face sheet also revealed R #81 was discharged from facility on 01/07/25 B. Record review of R #81's skin assessments…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide appropriate interventions for 1 (R #241) of 1 (R #241) residents reviewed for injury when the facility did not send R #241 to the emergency room (ER) for several hours after R #241 fell and experienced a head laceration (a tear or ragged cut in skin or flesh) with bleeding from her head, and was taking blood thinners. This deficient practice could likely result in R #241's head laceration becoming worse with additional bleeding. The findings are: A. Record review of R #241's face sheet revealed R #241 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] and was discharged on 11/04/24. B. Record review of R #241's physician orders dated 10/16/24, revealed R #241 was ordered Apixaban Oral Tablet (blood thinner) 2.5 mg (milligrams) by mouth two times a day. C. Record review of R #241's nursing progress notes revealed the following: -10/20/24 at 6:01 am: R #241 was found on the floor after R #241's called for help. R #241 stated she was getting out of bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the nutritional needs and preferences were met for 1 (R #11)of 1 (R #11) resident reviewed, when staff failed to serve the food items listed on the meal ticket. If the facility is not providing a meal as listed on the meal tickets, then residents are likely to experience weight loss, frustration, and depression. The findings are: A. Record review of R #11's meal ticket dated 01/07/25, revealed R #11 was on a Consistent Carbohydrate (CCHO) diet (Spreading carbohydrate consumption throughout the day to prevent blood sugar spikes) and was to be served salad with his dinner. B. On 01/07/25 at 1:32 pm during an interview with R #11, he stated that the kitchen staff does not always follow instructions and he is supposed to be getting a side salad with his dinner, but that does not happen. R #11 confirmed he had mentioned this to the nursing staff, who informed the dietary staff, but he still does not receive a side salad. C. On 01/07/25 at 5:08 pm during a dinner observation, R #11 was served a meatball sub…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-11-09 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff served meals at an appetizing temperature for 6 (R#'s 28, 2, 47, 30, 53, 2) of 6 (R#'s 28, 2, 47, 30, 53, 2) residents reviewed for meal temperatures. If the facility is not serving meals at residents desired temperatures then residents are likely to not eat their meals and be at risk for weight loss.The findings are: A. On 11/07/23 at 10:33 am, during an interview with R #2, she stated she preferred to eat her meals in her room. She stated the food was not hot. It's cold. The resident said if she asked the staff to warm it up then they take too long to bring it back to her. B. On 11/07/23 at 10:33 am, during an interview with R #47, she stated she preferred to eat her meals in her room. She stated the food was not hot . It's always cold. The resident said she did not ask the stafff to warm it up, because it took too long. C. On 11/07/23 at 10:33 am, during an interview with R #30, she stated she preferred to eat her meals in her room. She stated the food was not hot , it's cold. D. On 11/07/23 at 10:33 am,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-09 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — patternHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodations of resident needs and preferences for 2 (R #30 and 77) of 2 (R #30 and 77) residents reviewed by: 1. Not accommodating R #30's preference to have a refrigerator in her room. 2. Not accommodating R #77's preference for showers instead of bed baths as often as she would prefer. If facility is not honoring resident preferences then residents are not able to make choices about aspects of their lives that are important to them. This deficient practice is likely to result in the resident's life style, personal choices, needs and preference not being met which could result in loss of dignity and resident rights. The findings are: Concerning the refrigerator: A. On 11/07/23 at 10:05 AM during an interview with R #30, she stated she would like a refrigerator in her room. She further stated maintenance told her there was not an issue with her having a refrigerator in her room. She ordered a refrigerator on-line, and it was delivered to the facility. R #30 said the administrtor came and informed her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-09 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to give the resident council feedback on their concerns for 5 (R #28, 30, 47, 53 and 64) residents interviewed in the resident Council Meeting. If the facility is not ensuring the Resident Council grievances are responded to and resolved then residents are likely to feel that their issues and concerns are not taken seriously. The findings are: A. On 11/07/23 at 10:33 am during a meeting with R #28, R #30, 47, 53 and 64, the residents stated there have been concerns about meals served late and cold, and the concerns have not been resolved. The residents said it was an ongoing issue, and it has been brought up many times in the meetings with the Dietary Manager. The other concern is that there are not any snacks delivered or available at night. B. Record review of Quality Assurance Resident Council form, dated 08/23/23 at 1:30 PM, revealed the residents had dietary concerns and documented they still received cold food and coffee. There were no responses from Administration or Dietary Department. C. Record review of Quality…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide activities of daily living (ADL) assistance for baths/showers for 2 (R #'s 29 and 76) of 2 (R #'s 29 and 76) residents reviewed for ADL care. This deficient practice is likely to affect the dignity and health of the residents. The findings are: Findings for R #29: A. Record review of R #29's face sheet revealed R #29 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of the facility shower schedule revealed R #29 was to be offered a bed bath or shower every Tuesday and Friday. C. Record review of R #29's Documentation Survey Report (ADL tracking in the Electronic Health Record- EHR), dated 10/06/23 to 10/31/23, revealed R #29 received a bed bath/shower for 4 out of 7 opportunities for the entire month. D. Record review of R #29's facility shower sheets revealed R #29 received a bed bath/shower for 4 out of 7 opportunities for the entire month of October. E. Record review of R #29's Documentation Survey Report, dated 11/01/23 to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-09 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — patternEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure 1 (R #55) of 1 (R #55) residents reviewed for behavioral health concerns received necessary behavioral health care to meet their needs by not: 1. Ensuring effective communication between the facility and psychiatric (psych) providers regarding R #55's psych service needs. 2. Ensuring R #55's behavioral health/psych progress notes were documented for facility staff. These deficient practices are likely to result in the residents not receiving the behavioral or mental health care and assistance needed to improve mood and reduce depression and anxiety. The findings are: A. Record review of R #55's face sheet revealed R #55 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: 1. Major depressive disorder, 2. Anxiety disorder. B. Record review of R #55's care plan, dated 08/03/23, revealed: - Focus: R #55 used antidepressant medication related to depression. - Interventions: Monitor/document/report to doctor as needed. Ongoing signs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that medications stored in medication storage rooms and inside of the emergency medication kits (e-kit) were not expired. This deficient practice is likely to result in all residents who receive these medications that have lost their potency and effectiveness more vulnerable to acquiring infections. The findings are: Findings for Pecos Unit Medication Room E-Kit A. On 11/08/23 at 09:47 AM, observation of the Pecos Unit's medication storage room revealed the ekit contained the following: 1. Four glass vials of Ceftazidime (used to treat a wide variety of bacterial infections) contained 1 gram (basic unit for measurement of weight and mass) for injection,was expired on 09/2023. 2. Two glass single dose vials of Piperacillin and Tazobactam (used to treat a wide variety of bacterial infections) contained 3.375 grams for injection expired on 07/2023. B. On 11/08/23 at 10:00 am, during an interview, Certified Medication Aide (CMA) #1 confirmed all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-09 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Smoking Assessment was accurate for 1 (R #57) of 1 (R #57) residents reviewed for smoking. If the facility is not accurately assessing residents it is likely that the residents needs are not being met. The findings are: A. On 11/06/23 at 3:08 PM, during an interview, R#57 stated she was a smoker. B. Record review of R #57's Safe Smoking Evaluation, dated 09/02/2023, documented the resident was not a smoker. C. Record review of R #57's Care Plan dated 05/02/23 revealed: - Focus: The resident wished to smoke despite facility non-smoking policy. At risk for/potential for burns and for impaired gas exchange, related to history of smoking and strength. The resident understood the center's smoking policy. Date Initiated: 05/02/23 - Goal: Staff educated the resident about safety while smoking against policy. - Interventions: Educate resident on facility smoking policy. Encourage resident not to smoke to prevent injuries. Instruct and educate resident about the facility was a non-smoking facility. The staff offered the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$39,025 in federal fines across 3 penalties.
- $2,440 — penalty dated 2026-06-22
- $22,205 — penalty dated 2026-06-22
- $14,380 — penalty dated 2026-04-20
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to OPCO SKILLED MANAGEMENT — 66 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 1.7 | +1.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
The other 65 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 65; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| ARROYO HEALTHCARE 2, LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 06/01/2022 |
| KENWOOD TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 06/01/2022 |
| OXFORD SQUARE LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 06/01/2022 |
| RIMPAU HOLDINGS TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 06/01/2022 |
| SASEM INVESTMENTS LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 06/01/2022 |
| WELLINGTON HC PARTNERS LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 06/01/2022 |
| GARETZ, DAVID | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 06/01/2022 |
| GURWITZ, SOLOMON | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/25/2025 |
| HAGINS, ELIZABETH | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/25/2025 |
| KAPLAN, ESTHER | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/25/2025 |
| KAPLAN, MORDECHAI | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/25/2025 |
| MINDLE, ADAM | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/25/2025 |
| STERNSHEIN, JENNIFER | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/07/2025 |
| ZIMMERMAN, CAROLINE | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/25/2025 |
| 8820 HORIZON BLVD NM, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2022 |
| CONTINUUM REHAB GROUP LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2022 |
| GIBRALTAR TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2022 |
| HANSEN HUNTER LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/25/2025 |
| HERLACH REALTY TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2022 |
| NEW MEXICO GARDEN REALTY, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2022 |
| OPCO CA SKILLED MGMT INC. | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2022 |
| OPCO NM SKILLED MGMT, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2022 |
| OSER G REALTY TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2022 |
| SHAIN K REALTY TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2022 |
| THE WRIGHT GROUP CONSULTING, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2024 |
| SCHMIDT, KRISTINA | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2022 |
| STOLARCZYK, LISA | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/01/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 28 rows in the source record cover these 27 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
17 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $2.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in NM
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New Mexico Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 325123. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.