Skyline Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

39.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 32 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 65.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 23 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 58% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 50% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 204 beds and averages 169.6 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 34 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.05 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.44 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.01 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.74 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.18 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.43 to 0.46 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

39 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 24 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2023-09-27 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — pattern
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to consult the resident's physician and resident representative when there was a significant change in the resident's physical, mental or psychosocial status for one (Resident #1) of five residents reviewed for resident rights. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's physician and psychiatrist was notified when she refused her prescribed psychotropic and blood pressure medications consistently for over a week from 09/01/23 through 09/09/23 . 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's RP/family member(s) were notified when she refused her prescribed psychotropic and blood pressure medications consistently for over a week from 09/01/23 through 09/09/23. An Immediate Jeopardy was identified on 09/14/23. The IJ Template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 1:45 PM. While the Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 09/18/23, the facility remained out of compliance at the severity level of No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · K2023-09-27 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident has the right to be free from neglect for one (Resident #1) of five residents reviewed for neglect. 1. The facility failed to provide prescribed psychotropic medications to Resident #1, who lived with dementia and mental illness, and moved her to several different rooms in a week's time which resulted in her having increased behaviors resulting in two separate unwitnessed resident to resident altercations. 2. The facility failed to notify the MD when Resident #1 refused her psychotropic medications prior to the two resident to resident altercations. An Immediate Jeopardy was identified on 09/14/23. The IJ Template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 1:45 PM. While the Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 09/18/23, the facility remained out of compliance at the severity level of Actual harm that is not Immediate Jeopardy and at a scope of pattern due to the facility's need to implement and monitor the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · K2023-09-27 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent neglect for one (Resident #1) of five residents reviewed for neglect policies. The facility failed to provide prescribed psychotropic medications to Resident #1, who lived with dementia and mental illness, and moved her to several different rooms in a week's time which resulted in her having increased behaviors resulting in two separate unwitnessed resident to resident altercations. The facility failed to notify the MD when Resident #1 refused her psychotropic medications prior to the two resident to resident altercations. The facility did not provide Resident #1 with behavioral interventions and instead, initiated an unplanned and inappropriate transfer that led to Resident #1 being left across the street from the facility and subsequently arrested and incarcerated for a week. The facility was unaware Resident #1 had been arrested for two days and did not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · K2023-09-27 · tag F0742 — pattern
  Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who displayed or is diagnosed with a mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder, received appropriate treatment and services to correct the assessed problem or to attain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being for two (Residents #1 and #4) of five residents reviewed for psychosocial concerns. 1) The facility management and staff did not observe and intervene for manifestations related to mental and psychosocial adjustment difficulties when Resident #1, who lived with dementia with behavioral disturbance and mental illness was changed to three different rooms in a week, after she had been living in a room alone for most of 2023. When Resident #1 was moved to a new hall/floor, she slapped a male resident who lived across the hall from her on 09/05/23 and then moved to a different room on a new hall/floor and placed with an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2023-09-27 · tag F0624 — isolated
  Prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide and document sufficient preparation and orientation to residents to ensure safe and orderly transfer or discharge from the facility for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for transfer and discharge rights. The facility failed to provide or document sufficient preparation for an orderly transfer when Resident #1 allegedly got into an unwitnessed physical altercation with her new roommate. An Immediate Jeopardy was identified on 09/14/23. The IJ Template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 1:45 PM. While the Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 09/18/23, the facility remained out of compliance at the severity level of Actual harm that is not Immediate Jeopardy and at a scope of pattern due to the facility's need to implement and monitor the effectiveness of its corrective systems. This failure could place residents at risk of a disruption in their care and services and denying them and their RP a voice regarding their…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had a right to a dignified existence and self-determination that promoted enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality for 4 (Residents #14, #21, #178 and #184) of 6 residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure Resident #178's Care Plan was followed. Resident #178's mattress was placed directly on the floor which could be seen by anyone who entered the men's behavioral unit due to the location of Resident #178's room.The facility failed to ensure residents' information was not loudly discussed in the dining room and/or down the hallway for anyone to hear as evidenced by the following: -CNA Q loudly stating it was embarrassing that Resident #21 urinated in his pants in the dining room.-CNA K loudly reporting Resident #178 did not want to eat anymore.-CNA Q loudly telling coworkers she was going to change Resident #184.-ADON M loudly telling CNA K that Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident had a right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely for 4 of 18 resident beds (Resident bed #1, Resident bed #2, Resident bed #3, Resident bed #4) reviewed for bed linens. 1. The facility failed to ensure residents had linen that was clean and in good repair on Resident bed #1, Resident bed #2, Resident bed #3, and Resident bed #4 on 4/12/26 and 4/13/26.3. The facility failed to maintain enough linen on the downstairs secured unit. These failures could place residents at risk of exposure to infectious diseases, unsanitary environment and a decline in quality of life. Findings include: An observation of the downstairs secured unit on 04/12/2026 at 1:00 PM revealed Resident bed #1 and Resident bed #2 had soiled and worn linen, Resident bed #3 had soiled linen, and Resident bed #4 had soiled linen. In an interview on 04/13/2026 at 2:11 PM with LVN F, stated she was the charge nurse and has…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living receives the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for 4 of 12 residents (Resident#10, Resident#15, Resident#50,and Resident #169) reviewed for ADL care.The facility failed to provide Resident #169 assistance with timely incontinence care for at least 4 hours.The facility failed to ensure Resident #10 had his fingernails cleaned and trimmed on 04/12/26.The facility failed to ensure Resident #15 had his face cleaned and his eye free of buildup on 04/13/26.The facility failed to ensure Resident #50 had her fingernails cleaned and trimmed on 04/12/2026. These failures could place residents at risk for loss of dignity, risk for infections and a decreased quality of life. Findings included: 1.Record review of Resident #169's face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-14 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
  Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that each resident received, and the facility provided at least three meals daily, at regular times comparable to normal mealtimes in the community for two (lunch on 04/12/26 and 04/13/26) of two meals observed for dietary services. The facility failed to serve the 04/12/26 and 04/13/26 lunch meals on time at the scheduled time based on the meal postings. This failure could place residents at risk for decreased meal satisfaction, decreased intake, loss of appetite, side effects from medications given without food, and diminished quality of life. Findings included: Review of Resident #174's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected Resident #174 had a BIMS of 14 indicating he was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #37's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected Resident #37 had a BIMS of 14 indicating he was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #38's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected Resident #38…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to prevent the development and transmission of infection for 5 residents (Resident #164, # 21, 157, 184, and #105) of 10 residents observed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure:CNA B changed gloves and completed hand hygiene during incontinent care for Resident #164 on 4/12/26.CNA K did not utilize her bare hands when assisting Residents #21, #157 and #184 during lunch on 04/12/2026.CNA N wore appropriate PPE and completed hand hygiene during incontinent care for Resident #105, who was on Enhanced Barrier Precaution, on 4/13/26. These failures could place residents at risk for infection and cross contamination of pathogens and illness. Resident #164 Record review of Resident #164's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected Resident #164 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia (decline in mental ability such as…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-14 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the responsible party regarding changes in condition for 1 (Resident #178) of 6 sampled residents reviewed for changes in condition and resident rights. The facility failed to notify Resident #178's responsible party when he had a fall and when he had a newly acquired pressure wound. This failure could place residents at risk of not having their responsible party notified of changes resulting in a delay in medical intervention.Review of Resident #178's admission Record dated 04/14/2026 revealed Resident #178 was a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #178 was diagnosed with Paranoid Schizophrenia (chronic mental health disorder characterized by intense, irrational delusions and auditory hallucinations), Senile Degeneration of Brain (progressive mental decline and brain atrophy associated with advanced age, characterized by memory loss, confusion, and reduced cognitive function), Schizoaffective Disorder…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-14 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident had the right to personal privacy for personal care for one of five (Resident #105) residents observed for personal care. CNA N failed to provide privacy during incontinent care of Resident #105 on 04/13/26. The failure could affect residents, by placing them at risk for loss of privacy and dignity. The findings were: Record review of Resident #105's annual MDS assessment, dated 02/17/26, reflected an [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #105 had diagnoses which included hypertension (high blood pressure), type 2 diabetes mellitus (high blood sugar), Cerebrovascular Accident (a medical emergency occurring when blood flow to the brain is interrupted (ischemic) or a vessel bursts (hemorrhagic), causing rapid brain cell death) ,non-Alzheimer's dementia (diseases that affect memory, thinking, and the ability to perform daily activities), and Hemiplegia or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-14 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
  Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to assist residents in obtaining routine dental care for one of 8 residents (Resident #117) reviewed for dental services. The facility failed to ensure Resident #117 received routine dental services since admission on [DATE]. This failure could place residents at risk of difficulty with eating, decline in eating and a delay in treatment for dental services.Findings included Record review of Resident #117's face sheet undated reflected Resident #117 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side (conditions characterized by paralysis or weakness on the right side of the body due to a stroke), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), cognitive communication deficit and vascular dementia ( significant symptoms of dementia that affect daily living). Record review of Resident #117's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from misappropriation of property for one (Resident #1) of 10 residents reviewed for misappropriation of property. The facility failed to protect Resident #1 from misappropriation of property by one of their employees, Housekeeper A. On 12/18/2025 the Social Worker came to know that Housekeeper A used Resident #1's bank account for unauthorized transactions. As a result, Resident #1 lost approximately $300.00 from his personal bank account. This failure could place residents at risk of loss of lifelong earnings. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 01/08/2026 revealed Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old male, with an original admission date of 07/15/2025. Diagnoses included: Radiculopathy lumbosacral region (pain in the lower back), paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat), cerebrovascular disease (blood flow to the brain affected), adult failure to thrive (overall decline…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to provide the necessary services for residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 2 residents (Resident#1 and #Resident #2) of 6 residents reviewed for ADLs. The facility failed to ensure: 1. Resident #1 had his fingernails cleaned and trimmed on 08/06/25.2. Resident #2 had her fingernails cleaned and trimmed on 08/06/25.These failures could place residents who were dependent on staff for ADL care at risk for loss of dignity, risk for infections, and a decreased quality of life.1. Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old male initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included hypertension (elevated blood pressure), cerebrovascular accident (Occurs when blood flow to the brain is interrupted, leading to brain cell death and potential neurological damage)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to OPCO SKILLED MANAGEMENT — 66 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

11 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 79% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX