Casa Maria Healthcare
1601 South Main Street, Roswell, NM 88203 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 118 certified beds · (575) 623-6008 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0609, F0610) — most recent Sep 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565, F0567)
- inspectors cited 4 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (54) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $99,368 in federal fines (most recent 2024-09-10)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- about 29% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 6.4% | 11.3% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.9% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.3% | 0.9% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.3% | 0.9% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 2.2% | 2.0% | 6.5% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.2% | 3.5% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 12.1% | 11.7% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 18.0% | 14.7% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.7% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.7% | 5.2% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 21.3% | 20.0% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 9.7% | 14.5% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.0% | 1.1% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 67.2% | 86.4% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 24.2% | 22.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 22.7% | 15.7% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.54 | 1.65 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.78 | 2.81 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
51.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 187 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 72.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 119 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 25% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 51.0%CMS range 44.5–57.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 16.3%CMS range 12.1–19.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 72.3% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 62.2% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 68.9% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 45.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 98.4% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 78.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.6% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.9% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.5%CMS range 4.4–12.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.95 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 118 beds and averages 93.4 residents a day — about 79% occupied, or roughly 25 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.18 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.37 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.01 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.84 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.32 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.38 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
54 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 39 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-09-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to prevent an accident for 1 (R #1) of 3 (R #1, R #2, and R #3) residents reviewed for falls when: 1. R #1 sustained (14) falls in a 6.5 month period. 2. The facility did not implement adequate interventions to prevent falls 3. Neurochecks for unwitnessed falls and falls in which the resident hit her head were incomplete per policy. 4. One- to-one staffing was assigned to R #1, however staff were assigned other duties and R #1 had 3 falls during the time she was ordered to have one-to-one staffing in which she sustained injury to her head. These deficient practices likely resulted in R #1 sustaining multiple acute subarachnoid hemorrhage (bleeding between the space between the brain and tissue covering the brain) and passing away (6) days after her last fall at the facility. The findings are: A. Record review of R #1's face sheet revealed R #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including: - Unspecified dementia without…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-03-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility staff failed to report incidents of alleged abuse for 2 (R #1 and R #2) of 2 (R #1 and R #2) residents sampled. If the staff failed to report allegations of abuse to the facility administration then corrective measures may not be acted on, and the facility would be unable to assure residents are free from abuse and neglect. The findings are: R #1 A. Record review of R #1's face sheet revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R #1 was dependent on care on activities of daily living. Her diagnoses included but were not limited to: - Reduced mobility (severe chronic illness that requires immobilization in bed), - Need for assistance with personal care, - Spinal stenosis (narrowing of the spine) lumbar region, - Morbid severe obesity (overweight), and - Sepsis (life threatening condition that arises when the body's response to infection causes injury to its own tissues and organs). B. Record review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS; a federally mandated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-03-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation regarding allegations of sexual abuse for 1 (R #1) of 1 (R #1) residents that CNA #1 worked with. This failure could likely lead to other residents' being sexully abused. The findings are: R #1 A. Record review of R #1's face sheet revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R #1 was dependent on care for activies of daily living. Her diagnoses included but were not limited to: - Reduced mobility (severe chronic illness that requires immobilization in bed), - Need for assistance with personal care, - Spinal stenosis (narrowing of the spine) lumbar region, - Morbid severe obesity (overweight), and - Sepsis (life threatening condition that arises when the body's response to infection causes injury to its own tissues and organs). B. Record review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS; a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff), dated 11/30/23, identified R #1's Brief Interview for Mental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2023-12-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice when staff did not routinely check the blood sugar levels of residents with diabetes for 4 (R #'s 1, 2, 3, and 4) of 4 (R #'s 1, 2, 3, and 4) residents reviewed for diabetes mellitus [DM; an impaired ability of the body to produce or respond to insulin (a naturally occurring hormone made by your pancreas that helps your body use sugar for energy) to maintain proper sugar levels (glucose) in the blood.] This deficient practice resulted in R #1's blood sugar not being routinely checked or checked when R #1 experienced a change in condition (changes from a persons normal baseline status), which likely resulted in R #1 being hospitalized with high blood sugar levels and in a diabetic coma (life threatening complication resulting from very high blood sugar). This deficient practice is also likely to result in residents not receiving the appropriate diabetic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · H2024-03-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to prevent staff to resident sexual abuse and to protect other residents from ongoing sexual behaviors for 2 (R #1 & R #2) of 2 (R #1 and R #2) residents reviewed for abuse. This deficient practice likely resulted in psychosocial distress (unpleasant emotions associated with a highly stressful situation) for the residents who were subject to this behavior. The findings are: R #1 A. Record review of R #1's face sheet revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R #1 was dependent on care on activities of daily living. Her diagnoses included but were not limited to: - Reduced mobility (severe chronic illness that requires immobilization in bed), - Need for assistance with personal care, - Spinal stenosis (narrowing of the spine) lumbar region, - Morbid severe obesity (overweight), and - Sepsis (life threatening condition that arises when the body's response to infection causes injury to its own tissues and organs). B. Record review of the Minimum…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to complete a physician ordered referral to an orthopedic specialist for post fall follow up care for 1 (R #1) of 3 (R #1, R #2, and R #3) residents reviewed. This deficient practice could result in a delay in evaluation and treatment for possible injuries. The findings are: A. Record review of the facility's Resident Care and Services policy, dated 01/2026, revealed the following:1. Residents are provided with the necessary care and services to maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and social well-being in an environment that enhances quality of life in the scope of a long-term care facility. Care and services are provided in a manner that consistently enhances self-esteem and self-worth.2. Residents will be informed about medical treatments and have the right to refuse care. B. Record review of R #1's Face Sheet revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses:1. History of falling,2.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-05 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent misappropriation of resident money when a payment app account was used by a staff member for 1 (R #1) of 4 (R #1, R #2, R #3 and R #4) residents reviewed for exploitation (the fact of making use of a situation to gain unfair advantage for oneself). This deficient practice is likely to cause residents to feel unsafe, and experience anger and frustration. The findings are:A. Record review of R #1's admission Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses:1. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (heart disease),2. Non-ST Elevated (NSTEMI) Myocardial Infarction (a typer of heart attack),3. Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2, a condition that results from insufficient production of insulin, causing high blood sugar),4. Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD; A digestive disease in which stomach acid or bile irritates the food pipe lining),5. Cognitive communication deficit (impairments to cognitive functions).B. Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to post nurse staffing data daily at the beginning of the shift that included the following: 1. Facility name. 2. The current date. 3. The total number and the actual hours worked by the following categories of licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift: -Registered nurses. -Licensed practical nurses. -Certified nurse aides. -Resident census. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all 96 residents as identified by the census provided by the Admissions Coordinator (Admit) on 12/14/25 and could likely result in residents and visitors not having the staffing information readily available. The findings are:and visitors not having the staffing information readily available. The findings are:A. On 12/14/25 at 12:15 pm a random observation of the facility revealed the facility's staff data posting was dated 12/11/25.B. On 12/14/25 at 12:32 pm, during an interview with the Admit, she confirmed the staff data posting was for 12/11/25 and had not been updated daily.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespreadEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure safe medication storage practices by not ensuring the medical supply storage rooms were kept free of expired medications.This deficient practice has the potential to affect all 96 residents as identified by the census provided by the Administrator on 12/14/25. If the facility does not ensure safe storage practices, then residents are at risk for adverse effects due to improper storage. The findings are: A. On 12/18/25 at 10:05 am during an observation of the medical storage, the refrigerator in the storage room revealed the following: 1. One Novolog Mix 70/30 Flex Pen (a pre-filled, disposable insulin pen that combines 70% intermediate-acting insulin aspart protamine and 30% rapid-acting insulin aspart). Expiration date: 03/31/242. Three Novolog Mix 70/30 Flex Pens. Expiration date: 06/30/25.B. On 12/19/25 at 10:07 am during an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #3, she confirmed the pens were expired and should be properly disposed.
- Potential for harm · F2025-12-18 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — widespreadRegularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to conduct regular inspections of all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails as part of a regular maintenance program to identify areas of possible entrapment 13 (R #2, R #4, R #5, R #6, R #10, R #12, R #13, R #19, R #54, R #55, R #63, R #84, and R #88) of 13 (R #2, R #4, R #5, R #6, R #10, R #12, R #13, R #19, R #54, R #55, R #63, R #84, and R #88). This deficient practice could likely result in serious injury or death if residents become trapped between the mattress, side rail, footboard and headboard. The findings are: Cross reference findings for 700A. On 12/16/25 at 2:07 pm during an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) and Administrator (ADMIN), they stated bed evaluations, assessments and regular maintenance should be completed for all residents' beds and they have not been done. They stated this does not meet their expectations for safety.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-18 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — patternPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents did not receive psychotropic medications (group of drugs that affect behavior, mood, thoughts, or perception) unless the medication was medically necessary for 2 (R #2 and R #4) of 3 (R #2, R #4 and R #54) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, when staff failed to: 1. Ensure psychotropic medications were necessary to treat a specific condition as diagnosed and documented in the clinical record for R #2 and R #4, 2. Ensure as needed psychotropic medications are limited to only 14 days or indicate the duration of the as needed (PRN) order for R #2. These deficient practices could likely lead to adverse drug effects and poor patient outcomes. The findings are:R #2A. Record review of R #2's admission record revealed she was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses:1. Insomnia (a common sleep disorder making it hard to fall asleep, stay asleep),2. Major depressive disorder (a mental health disorder…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-18 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to create an accurate and complete baseline care plan (minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for a resident immediately upon their admission to the facility) within 48 hours of admission for 4 (R #7, R #15, R #79, R #106) of 6 (R #7, R #8, R #15, R #35, R #79, and R #106) residents reviewed for care plans. This deficient practice could likely result in residents not receiving the appropriate care and may place residents at risk of an adverse event (undesirable experience, preventable or non-preventable, that caused harm to a resident because of medical care or lack of medical care) or worsening of current condition after admission. The findings are:R #15A. Record review of R #15's admission Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses:1. Unspecified nondisplaced fracture (break) of surgical neck of left humerus (bone of the upper arm, forming a joint at the shoulder and elbow),2.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff revised the care plan for 4 (R #2, R #5, R #54, and R #55) of 4 (R #2, R #5, R #54, and R #55) residents reviewed when staff failed to:Revise care plans for R #2 and R #55 for the use of bed rails,Revise care plan for R #5's dependence on staff for bed mobility,Revise care plan to include interventions for bed rail usage for R #54. These deficient practices are likely to result in residents' care and needs not being addressed if care plans are not updated. The findings are: R#2A. Record review of R #2's admission record revealed R #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: 1. Morbid obesity (severe degree of being overweight and a significant health concern),2. Muscle weakness (when your muscles cannot work as hard as they should),3. Lack of coordination (difficulty in making controlled purposeful movements),4. Need for assistance with personal care. B. Record review of R #2 care plan revised on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-18 · tag F0700 — patternTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed for risk of entrapment (state of being stuck or caught on bed rail) in bed rails for 13 (R #2, R #4, R #5, R #6, R #10, R #12, R #13, R #19, R #54, R #55, R #63, R #84, and R #88) of 13 (R #2, R #4, R #5, R #6, R #10, R #12, R #13, R #19, R #54, R #55, R #63, R #84, and R #88) residents reviewed for accidents. This deficient practice has the potential to cause serious injury by becoming trapped between the mattress and bed rail. The findings are: R#2A. Record review of R #2's admission record revealed R #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: 1. Morbid obesity (severely overweight),2. Muscle weakness (reduction in the power exerted by muscles),3. Lack of coordination,4. Need for assistance with personal care. B. On 12/14/25 at 3:49 pm during a random observation of R #2's room revealed quarter size bed rails on the upper left and right sides of the bed. C. Record review of R…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-18 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — patternEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen (plan to manage a person's medication) was free from unnecessary drugs by ensuring indication of use is based on the residents' current diagnosis for 3 (R #2, R #4, and R #54) of 3(R #2, R #4, and R #54) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. This deficient practice could likely lead to adverse drug effects and poor patient outcomes. The findings are: R #2A. Record review of R #2's admission record revealed she was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: 1. Insomnia (a common sleep disorder making it hard to fall asleep, stay asleep),2. Major Depressive Disorder (a mental health disorder characterized by persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities, causing significant impairment in daily life),3. Psychotic Disorder (a severe mental illness causing a loss of touch with reality). B. Record review of R #2's physician orders revealed the following:1. Cetirizine…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 39 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to complete the following:1. Maintain the ice and water machine in a manner to prevent contamination and foodborne pathogens (a bacterium, virus, or other microorganism that can cause disease), 2. Properly store food items by tracking when to discard, labeling and covering perishable foods, and dating all foods stored in refrigerator, freezer, or pantry.3. Maintain the kitchen environment in a clean and sanitary manner. 4. Temperature tracking sheet on the outside of the refrigerator was dated November 2025. 5. Ensuring food served to residents was sanitary.These failures have the potential to result in cross contamination, the growth of foodborne pathogens, and foodborne illnesses. The findings are:Ice and water machineA. On 12/14/25 at 2:00 pm a random observation of the dining area revealed the ice and water machine had dried residue and what appeared to be dried food particles and splatters covering the outside of the machine and the table the machine sits on.Food storageB. On 12/14/25 at 2:05 pm a random observation of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain proper infection prevention measures for 3(R #6, R #54, and R #98) of 3(R #6, R #54, and R #98) residents reviewed by not: Ensuring Enhanced Barrier Protection (EBP) signage is visibly posted outside resident's room when precautions are in place. Ensuring Personal Protective Equipment is available (PPE) is available,Ensuring EBP signage was posted properly.Infection Control Signs and PPER #6C. Record review of R #6's admission record revealed R #6 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. D. Record review of R #6's significant change comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] revealed the following:Two, stage three pressure ulcers (involves full-thickness skin loss, where the wound extends through the skin into the fatty tissue), One, stage four pressure ulcer (the most severe type of bedsore, involving full-thickness tissue loss where skin, fat, and underlying muscle, tendon, or bone become exposed and damaged, creating deep,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided activities according to their preference for 1 (R #4) of 1 (R #4) resident reviewed for activities of daily living. This deficient practice is likely to result in the residents' personal choices not being honored and loss of dignity. The findings are: A. Record review of R #4 admission record revealed R #4 was admitted on [DATE].B. Record review of R #4's care plan, revised on 06/22/24 revealed R #4 prefers activities that identify with prior lifestyle. She prefers current events, educational programs, movies, sports, and television.C. On 12/14/25 at 3:52 pm during an interview with R #4, she stated she was upset because the facility had taken the power strip that connected her television to the outlet earlier this morning. She stated she could not watch television anymore because the television cord does not reach the outlet. She stated the facility informed her that it was a safety hazard.D. Record review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident's current advance directive (a document which provides an individual's wishes for emergency and lifesaving care) and the resident's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed the same resident wishes for 3 (R #9, R #79, and R #84) of 6 (R #9, R #10, R #63, R #67, R #79, and R #84) residents reviewed for advance directives. This deficient practice is likely to cause confusion and delay potentially lifesaving procedures. The findings are:R #9A. Record review of the face sheet in R #9's EHR revealed R #9 was admitted into the facility on [DATE], and his current Advance Directive was listed as Attempt Resuscitation/CPR (CPR; a lifesaving emergency measure that combines chest compression with artificial ventilation are desired). B. Record review of R #9's MOST (MOST; a legal document which outlines the care the resident wants when they become incapacitated and unable to speak for themselves) form revealed the form was signed and dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to create an accurate baseline care plan (minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for a resident immediately upon their admission to the facility) within 48 hours of admission for 4 (R #7, R #15, R #79, R #106) of 6 (R #7, R #8, R #15, R #35, R #79, and R #106) residents reviewed for care plans. This deficient practice could likely result in residents not receiving the appropriate care and may place residents at risk of an adverse event (undesirable experience, preventable or non-preventable, that caused harm to a resident because of medical care or lack of medical care) or worsening of current condition after admission. The findings are:R #7A. Record review of R #7's admission Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses:1. Metabolic encephalopathy2. End Stage Renal DialysisB. Record review of R #7's Baseline Care Plan revealed the following:1. The Social Services section (section…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate did not exceed 5 percent (%) when staff performed four medication errors out of 32 opportunities for 1 (R #106) of 6 (R #15, R #35, R #41, R #79, R #101, and R #106) residents reviewed during medication administration. This resulted in a medication error rate of 12.5%. This deficient practice could likely result in the residents receiving incorrect medication, not receiving the desired therapeutic effect, and exposing the residents to a higher risk of side effects. The findings are:A. On 12/17/25 at 8:06 am during an observation of medication administration through R #106's feeding tube, Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) #1 prepared [crushing or pouring from a capsule] four different medications for administration and combined all four medications into one medication cup. B. Record review of the facility's policy dated 04/12/23 stated crushed medications are not mixed into the same medicine cup, unless approved by the prescribing physician. C. Record review of physician orders:1.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure call lights in the residents' rooms were within reach of the residents while in the room for 1 (R #5) of 5 (R #2, R #5, R #54, R #88 and R #98) residents reviewed for call lights. This deficient practice could likely result in residents being unable to notify staff when they need assistance. The findings are:A. On 12/15/25 at 9:57am during a random observation of R #5's room, his call light was observed to be on the side of his bed between the mattress and bed rail. B. On 12/15/25 at 9:58 am, during an interview with R #5, he confirmed he could not reach his call light. C. On 12/15/25 am at 10:02 am during an interview with Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #3, she confirmed R #5's call light was not in his reach and should always be within his reach.
- Potential for harm · E2025-09-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide activities of daily living (ADL; activities related to personal care such as bathing, showering, dressing, walking, toileting, and eating) assistance for baths or showers for 3 (R #1, R #2, and R #3) of 3 (R #1, R #2, and R #3) residents reviewed for ADL care. This deficient practice is likely to affect the dignity and health of the residents. The findings are:R #1A. Record review of R #1's admission Record revealed R #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses:1. History of falling,2. Seizures (convulsions),3. Lack of coordination,4. Cognitive communication deficit (communication problems caused from cognitive impairment),5. Traumatic subdural hemorrhage (a collection of blood between the outer layer and middle layers of the brain's covering due to a traumatic brain injury),6. Generalized muscle weakness (the body's inability to contract muscles properly), 7. Reduced mobility,8. Muscle wasting,9. Difficulty in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to report a suicide attempt where a potential for serious bodily injury can occur within 24 hours to the State Agency (SA) for 1 (R #2) of 1 (R #2) resident reviewed for abuse. If the facility fails to report these incidents to the State Agency, then the State Agency cannot ensure the residents' safety is protected. The findings are: 1. Record review of the facility's Initial Incident Report for R #1's suicide attempt on 09/01/25 revealed the initial report was submitted to the SA on 09/10/25. 2. On 09/11/25 at 2:15 pm during an interview with the Regional Nurse Consultant, she confirmed that the report was not submitted timely within 24 hours.
- Potential for harm · F2024-09-20 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — widespreadHonor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews the facility failed to ensure residents have ready and reasonable access to their money. This deficient practice could likely affect all 95 residents who reside at the facility. If the facility is not ensuring residents have access to their money, then residents are likely to feel undignified and unworthy. The findings are: A. On 09/17/24 at 8:42 am, during an interview with R #24, she stated she recently received a check for a large amount of money, but the facility will not give her any money. She stated the facility tells the residents that they've [the facility] ran out of money when money is requested. R #24 stated that the facility never gives out money on the weekends. B. On 09/17/24 at 10:00 am, during an interview with the Resident Council members [R #10, R #34, R #40, R #44, R #45, R #55, and R #64], they stated on weekdays, when they request money, staff have constantly told them that the money is not available. The residents further stated that they are never allowed to get money on the weekends. C. On 09/18/24 at 9:50 am, during an interview with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-09-20 · tag F0576 — widespreadEnsure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents are able to receive mail on Saturdays for all 95 residents residing at the facility. This deficient practice is likely to result in residents not receiving timely communication which could result in feelings of isolation. The findings are: A. On 09/17/24 at 10:00 am, during the Resident's Council Meeting [R #10, R #34, R #40, R #44, R #45, R #55, R #64, and R #70], the residents stated mail is not delivered on Saturdays and they would like to receive their mail when it is delivered to the facility. R #44 stated she has never received her mail on a Saturday, even when she is waiting for a package. R #44 stated she has had to wait up to two days to receive packages that contain personal incontinence supplies. B. On 09/18/24 at 11:25 am, during an interview with the Activities Director (AD) she confirmed the mail is not delivered on the weekends. She stated she is the only staff at the facility that delivers the mail to residents. so if she is not at work, the mail does not get delivered. C. On 09/19/24 at 10:24 am…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-09-20 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — widespreadEnsure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide documentation confirming on Nurse Aide (NA) #1, employed by the facility, had completed a Nurse Aide Training and Competency Evaluation Program (NATCEP) or a Competency Evaluation Program (CEP) within four months of being employed at the facility. This deficient practice is likely to affect all 95 residents residing in the facility. Residents are likely to experience substandard care because of the use of untrained or unqualified aides providing direct care to residents. The findings are: A. Record review of NA #1's personnel record reviewed the following: 1. NA #1's hire date was 07/17/23. 2. NA #1's date of Certified Nurse Aide certification was 12/08/23. B. On 09/20/25 at 11:55 am, during an interview with the Human Resources Director (HRD), she confirmed NA #1 received her certification late and continued to work shifts during that time. She stated her expectation is for all nurse aides to become certified within four months.
- Potential for harm · F2024-09-20 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and observation, the facility failed: 1. Ensure meals were attractive when served to residents. 2. Ensure foods were palatable (pleasant to taste) and to the resident's satisfaction. 3. Ensure cold and hot foods were served at the appropriate temperatures to prevent scalding and burning. 4. Ensure foods were served timely to each resident and those sharing tables. These deficient practices have the potential to affect all 95 residents' ability to eat and enjoy meals, may decrease their quality of life, and could likely lose weight. The findings are: Food Attractiveness A. On 09/16/24 at 3:51 pm, during an observation of R #90 in his room, he had a partially eaten hamburger on his bedside table. The meat was visibly red in the middle and appeared undercooked. B. On 09/16/24 at 3:51 pm, during an interview, R #90 stated he was asked during breakfast what he wanted for lunch and was offered chicken fried steak. When he arrived for lunch, they served him spaghetti. He was told by the staff that he could not have chicken fried steak, because it is not included on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-09-20 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — widespreadEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the nutritional needs and preferences were met for all 95 residents listed on the facility census provided by the Administrator on 09/16/24 by not having an alternative meal available for residents. If the facility is not providing an alternative meal or offering an alternate meal menu to residents, then residents are likely to experience weight loss, frustration, and depression. The findings are: A. Record review of the posted menu for September 2024, indicated only one meal option for breakfast, lunch and dinner. The facility did not offer an alternative meal/choice (second meal option) for each meal, that is equal in nutritional value to the primary meal being served to all residents. B. On 09/19/24 at 11:17 am during an interview with the VPN (Vice President of Nutrition) she stated there is an always available menu. When asked if it was equivalent to the nutritional value of the main scheduled meal, she stated she feels the everyday menu may have different calories, but feels the resident has the choice to eat…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to store and serve food under sanitary conditions by not ensuring: 1. Kitchen was clean and sanitary. 2. Food items labeled and dated 3. Refrigeration unit was clean. 5. Food storage and handling. 6. Maintenance of kitchen equipment and plumbing These deficient practices are likely to affect all 95 residents listed on the resident census list provided by the Administrator on 09/16/24 and could likely lead to foodborne illnesses in residents if food is not being stored properly, safe food handling practices are not adhered to and sanitation of equipment preparation areas are not cleaned appropriately. The findings are: A. On 09/16/24 at 12:03 pm, during an observation of the initial tour of the kitchen and pilot kitchen from 12:03 pm through 12:33 pm, the following was revealed: 1. The floor was sticky. 2. The kitchen sink near preparation area had hard water deposits around the spicket. 3. The ice machine had hardwater stains on the outside near door opening. 4. A visibly soiled rag laid in the corner of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-20 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — patternAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to participate in the care planning process for 3 (R #24, R #30, and R #96) of 5 (R #24, R #30, R #90, R #96, and R #294) residents reviewed for care plans. If the facility fails to ensure resident's participation in the care planning process, then residents are likely to feel unimportant and uninformed. The findings are: R #24 A. Record review of R #24's admission Record revealed R #24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnosis including: 1. Unspecified Sequelae of Unspecified Cerebrovascular Disease (conditions that impact blood vessels in the brain). 2. Bipolar Disorder (a disorder associated with episodes of mood swings ranging from depressive lows to manic highs). 3. Anxiety Disorder. 4. Anoxic Brain Damage (damage to the brain from lack of oxygen), not elsewhere classified. 6. Difficulty in walking B. Record review of R #24's admission Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS; a federally mandated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-20 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — patternHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to promote residents' choices for 2 (R #28 and R#96) of 2 (R #28 and #96) residents reviewed for choices when staff failed to: 1. Announce themselves prior to entering R #28's room. 2. Accommodate R #96's choice to have her oxygen tube attached to the rail of her bed. These deficient practices are likely to result in the resident's needs, choices and preferences not being honored. The findings are: R #28 A. Record review of R #28's current physician orders, R #28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnosis including: 1. Acute and Chronic Respiratory Failure. 2. Other reduced mobility. 3. Muscle wasting and Atrophy. 4. Morbid obesity. 5. Unspecified Osteoarthris. B. On 09/16/24 at 2:28 pm, during an interview with R #28, she stated that she is frustrated because staff enters her room without knocking. R #28 stated she has reported her concerns to the Administrator, but it continues to occur. C. On 09/19/24 at 10:14 am,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-20 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, the facility failed to ensure the grievances identified by the Resident Council (RC) were resolved and the resolutions communicated back to the RC committee. This deficient practice could likely affect all 95 residents who reside at the facility. If the staff is not ensuring RC grievances are responded to and resolutions are communicated back to the RC group, then residents are likely to feel that their concerns do not matter, and do not have any influence over changing issues identified by residents. The findings are: A. On 09/17/24 at 10:00 am, during an interview with the Resident's Council members [R #10, R #34, R #40, R #44, R #45, R #55, R #64, and R #70], they stated the facility discourages them from filing grievances and when they do file grievances the facility does not respond timely, if at all. B. On 09/18/24 at 11:25 am, during an interview with the Activity Director (AD), she stated she fills out the grievance forms and submits the forms to the appropriate department head for completion. She stated that she informs the residents of the outcome of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-20 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to complete an accurate comprehensive assessment for 2 (R #22 and R #75) of 2 (R #22 and R #75) residents reviewed for assessments. This deficient practice is likely to result in residents not receiving an accurate assessment which could result in the residents receiving less than optimal care and treatment. The findings are: R #22 A. On 09/17/24 at 11:30 AM during an interview and observation with R #22, she stated she needed dental care but, she has not been offered a dental appointment. R #22 had missing teeth and discoloration. B. Record review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], Section L: Oral and Dental Status indicated R #22 did not have any dental problems. C. On 09/20/24 at 1:52 PM during an interview with the MDS coordinator, he confirmed R #22's dental information was entered incorrectly. R #75 D. On 09/17/24 at 9:43 AM during an interview with R #75, he stated he would like dentures, he further stated he has…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-20 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide an ongoing program of activities designed to meet the interests for 4 (R #22, R #24, R #30, and R #90) of 6 (R #22, R #24, R #30, R #90, R #242, and R #294) residents reviewed for activities by not providing meaningful individualized activities based upon residents' interests. If residents are not provided or encouraged to attend/participate in activities that meets their interests, then they are likely to experience an increase in boredom, isolation, and depression. The findings are: R #22 A. Record review of R #22's admission Record revealed R #22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including: 1. Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus without complications (DM2, a condition results from insufficient production of insulin, causing high blood sugar). 2. Schizophrenia, unspecified (a disorder that affects an individual's ability to think, feel, and behave clearly). 3. Bipolar Disorder, unspecified (a disorder associated with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-20 · tag F0685 — patternAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received proper treatment to maintain vision for 1 (R #24) of 2 (R #24 and R #106) residnets reviewed for vision. This deficient practice could likely result in residents losing some independence if they cannot see, and compromising their quality of life. The findings are: A. Record review of R #24's admission Record revealed R #24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnosis including: 1. Unspecified Sequelae of Unspecified Cerebrovascular Disease (conditions that impact blood vessels in the brain). 2. Bipolar Disorder (a disorder associated with episodes of mood swings ranging from depressive lows to manic highs). 3. Anxiety Disorder. 4. Anoxic Brain Damage (damage to the brain from lack of oxygen), not elsewhere classified. 5. Difficulty in walking B. On 09/17/24 at 8:51 am, during an interview with R #24, she stated she needs eyeglasses because she can not see very well. R #24 further stated the previous Social…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-20 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was 5% or less when six medication errors occurred out of 43 opportunities, which resulted in an error rate of 13.95% for 4 (R #19, R #24, R #55, and R #76) of 7 (R #19, R #24, R #38, R #41, R #55, R #62, and R #76) residents observed during medication administration. This deficient practice could likely result in the residents receiving the incorrect medication, not receiving the desired therapeutic effect, and exposing the resident to a higher risk of side effects. The findings are: Incorrect Administration A. Record review of the physician's order dated 09/17/24 for R #55, revealed an order for Lantus Subcutaneous solution (long-acting insulin that starts to work several hours after injection and keeps working evenly for 24 hours and is used to improve blood sugar control) 100 UNIT/ML (100 units of insulin per milliliter of solution) (insulin glargine [bioengineered (man-made) injectable form of long-acting insulin that is used to regulate sugar/glucose levels]) Inject 46…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-20 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free of a significant medication error by not administering medications as ordered for 1 (R #55) of 1 (R #55) resident reviewed for administration of insulin (hormone produced in the pancreas which regulates the amount of glucose in the blood). This deficient practice could likely have severe negative effects on the resident, such as hypoglycemia (too little sugar in the blood) and lead to symptoms of trouble talking, confusion, loss of consciousness, seizures, or death. The findings are: A. Record review of R #55's admission Record (no date) revealed the diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (condition characterized by high blood glucose levels caused by either a lack of insulin or the body's inability to use insulin efficiently) with foot ulcer. B. Record review of R #55's Physician's Orders revealed an order dated 09/17/24 at 8:00 am Lantus Subcutaneous solution (long-acting insulin that starts to work several hours after injection and keeps working evenly for 24 hours and is used to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-20 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — patternProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents obtained routine dental care for 3 (R #22, R #24 and R #75) of 3 (R #22, R #24 and R #75) residents reviewed for dental services. This failure is likely to result in the resident experiencing pain, embarrassment over condition of teeth, and potential weight loss. The findings are: R#22 A. Record review of R #22's face sheet revealed R #22 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. B. On 09/17/24 at 11:30 AM during an observation and interview with R #22, she had missing teeth, tooth decay and discoloration on the remaining teeth. R #22 stated, she had not been offered dental care. She stated she had some of her teeth pulled in the past and she wanted to get dentures. C. On 09/18/24 at 2:36 PM during an interview with Medical Records/Scheduler, she stated she schedules specialty services only and Social Services will make all other appointments for needs that are requested during care plan meetings or interdisciplinary team…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, the facility failed to administer medications in a manner to prevent cross contamination for 3 (R #19, R #24, and R #76) of 7 (R #19, R #24, R #38, R #41, R # 55, R #62, and R #76) residents. The failure has the potential to cause residents to be exposed to pathogens (organisms that can cause disease) and increased risk of infection. The findings are: A. On 09/18/24 at 8:05 am, during an observation of the medication administration pass, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 prepared and gave R #19's medication and went back to the medication cart after administering medications. LPN #1 did not sanitize or wash her hands before or after resident contact. B. On 09/18/24 at 8:18 AM, during continued medication administration observation, LPN #1 prepared medications for R #76. R #76's medications included a subcutaneous (just under the skin) injection. LPN #1 entered the resident's room, donned (to put on) gloves and administered the resident her medications. LPN #1 removed gloves and exited the room. LPN #1 went back to the medication cart…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-20 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review the facility failed to ensure the medical records contained documentation that each resident received, or staff offered the pneumococcal (a bacteria that can cause pneumonia infection of the respiratory tract) or influenza (flu) vaccines for 1 (R #74) of 6 (R #2, R #17, R #22, R #39, R #74, and R #75) residents reviewed for immunizations. If residents are not vaccinated as appropriate against pneumonia and influenza, they have a higher likelihood of contracting that illness and spreading it to other 95 residents on the census list provided by Administrator (ADM) on 09/16/24 and staff in the facility. The findings are: A. Record review of R #74's medical record revealed the following: 1. admission record for R #74 indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. 2. Review of the EHR (Electronic Health Record) did not contain consent forms or declination forms for either vaccination. 3. Record review of the facility's policy titled Influenza Prevention and Control (no date) are to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-20 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — patternEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) received the required in-service training of 12 hours per year for 1 (CNA #1) of 2 (CNA #1 and CNA #2) CNAs reviewed for required in-service training. This deficient practice is likely to result in the CNAs not receiving the necessary training to meet the care needs of the residents. The findings are: A. Record review of CNA #1's personnel file revealed CNA #1 was hired on 06/27/23. B. Record review of CNA #1's in-service training Transcript Report revealed CNA #1 did not complete any of the required 12 hours trainings from 06/27/23 to 09/20/24. C. On 09/20/24 at 11:55 am, during an interview with the Human Resources Director (HRD), she confirmed CNA #1 has not completed any trainings during her employment at the facility. She confirmed CNA #1 continues to work shifts providing care for residents in the facility even though she has not completed any of the trainings. The HRD stated she expected all CNAs to complete at least 12 hours of training per year.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to promote care with dignity and respect for 4 (R #3, R #44, R #56, and R #70) of 6 (R #3, R #12, R #44, R #56, R #64, and R #70) residents reviewed during a random dining observation when the facility failed to serve lunch at the same time to all the residents who sat at the same dining table. This deficient practice could likely result in residents feeling frustrated and disappointed. The findings are: A. On 09/16/24 at 12:04 pm, during a lunch observation in the dining room, revealed the following: 1. R #12 and R #56 sat at the same table waiting for lunch to be served: a. R #12 was served his meal at 12:22 pm and R #56 watched R #12 eat his meal. b. R #56 was served his meal at 12:29 pm. 2. R #3, R #44, R #64, and R #70 sat at the same table waiting for lunch to be served: a. R #64 was served his meal at 12:34 pm and R #3, R #44, and R #70 watched R #64 eat his meal. b. R #3 was served her meal at 12:36 pm and R #44 and R #70 watched R #3 eat her meal. c. R #70 was served his meal at 12:40 pm and R #44 watched R #70 eat his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespreadEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure all treatment carts were locked while unattended. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 94 people residing in the facility by allowing unauthorized persons access to their medical supplies and personal health information. The findings are: A. On 08/23/24 at 8:23 am, during a random observation of the facility, the treatment cart located in the short hallway between the dining room and the nurse's station was unlocked, and facility employees were not in the area. B. On 08/23/24 at 8:24 am, during an interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1, she confirmed the treatment cart was unlocked, and facility employees were not in the area. C. On 08/23/24 at 8:26 am, during an interview with Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) she stated the treatment cart should be locked and secured while not in use.
- Potential for harm · F2024-04-25 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — widespreadHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure grievances (complaints over something believed to be wrong or unfair) were acted upon for 3 (R #3, R #6, and R #12) of 3 (R #3, R #6, and R #12) residents reviewed for grievances. This deficient practice could likely result in residents feeling unimportant and unsatisfied with the results of the grievance process. The finding are: R #3 A Record review of R #3's face sheet revealed that R #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. B. On 04/24/25 at 3:15 pm during an interview with R #3, she stated that the facility continues to 1. Send cold food. 2. Send improper eating utensils (fork for oatmeal, spoon for pork chops). 3. Sends bread on her tray when she asks for no carbs. 4. During church service on Sunday's its very noisy and loud in the kitchen. R #3 stated these complaints have been brought up at the Resident Council meetings and they have not been addressed with her or the Resident Council. The dates of the Resident Council meetings took…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-25 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — patternEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the residents' ability to perform activities of daily living (ADLs) was maintained for 2 (R #10 and R #11) of 4 (R #1, R #4, R #10 and R #11) residents reviewed for restorative therapy (Restorative services refers to nursing interventions that promote the resident ' s ability to adapt and adjust to living as independently and safely as possible). If the facility does not ensure that residents receive restorative services, then the residents are likely to experience a decrease in their ability to walk, transfer, and do other activities of daily living. The findings are: A. Record review of R #10's Therapy Records indicated that R #10 was discharged from physical therapy (PT), occupational therapy (OT), and speech therapy (ST) on 04/10/2024. B. Record review of care plan for R #10 dated 04/10/24 revealed that PT was to evaluate for fall prevention. C. Record review of R #11's Therapy Records indicated that R #11 was discharged from PT and OT services on 04/03/2024 and was discharged from ST on 03/27/2024. D. Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff revised and updated the care plan for 1 (R #5) of 1 (R #5) residents reviewed for care plans when staff failed to add R #5's behavior to refuse diabetic management practices (insulin and blood sugar level checks). This deficient practice is likely to result in residents' care and needs not being addressed if care plans are not updated. The findings are: A. Record review of R #5's face sheet revealed R #5 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia (high blood sugar). B. Record review of R #5's physician order, dated 08/28/23, revealed Insulin Lispro Injection Solution 100 unit/milliliter (ml), insulin lispro. - Inject as per the following sliding scale, subcutaneously (under the skin) before meals and at bedtime for diabetes mellitus: - If blood glucose level is 70 to149, give 0 units; - 150 to 199, give 2 units; - 200 to 249, give 3 units; - 250 to 299, give 4 units; - 300 to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-07-07 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to post Nurse Staffing Information in an accurate manner and at the beginning of each shift, This deficient practice could likely prevent the 71 residents on the facility census list provided by the Administrator on 06/25/23, and any visitors to have access to accurate daily staffing information. The findings are: A. On 07/06/23 at 8:00 am during an observation the facility, the posted nurse staffing daily schedule at both nurses stations was dated 07/05/23, and the Registered Nurse (RN) staffing section was left blank. An additional posted nursing staff daily schedule located on the 200 hallway was dated 06/29/23. B. Record review of the prior two months of posted nursing staff schedules revealed the following: 1. Posted nursing staff schedule dated 06/01/23 had two different postings for the same date, with different numbers of staff posted 2. Posted nursing staff schedule dated 06/02/23 had two different postings for the same date, with different numbers of staff posted 3. Posted nursing staff schedule dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-07-07 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — widespreadEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide an alternate meal menu for residents that preferred not to eat the meal served on the menu. By failing to post an alternate meal, all 71 residents listed on the census provided by the Administrator, may not be aware that they have choices. This deficient practice could lead to residents having less than optimal nutritional health outcomes, and suffer unwanted weight loss. The findings are: A. On 06/25/23 at 11:30 am, during observation of the facility it was noted that the menu displayed in the hallways bulletin boards did not show an alternate meal choice. B. On 06/25/23 at 12:00 pm, during observation of the main dining room, the displayed menus for breakfast, lunch, and dinner did not list an alternate meal choice. C. On 06/26/23 at 11:50 am, during observation of the main dining room, it was noted that the displayed menus did not contain an alternate menu listing. D. Record review of the facility meal menu revealed that the facility did not offer alternate meal choices for breakfast, lunch, or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-07-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was labeled and dated in the refrigerators and dry storage areas. This deficient practice could affect the 71 residents, as listed on the facility census provided by the Administrator on 06/25/23, that receive food or meals from the kitchen. If the facility does not ensure food storage is conducted using proper procedures, residents have the potential to receive food that is expired, or potentially exposed to food contamination resulting in foodborne illness. The findings are: A. On 06/25/23 at 9:08 am, the following items were observed during the kitchen tour: Preparation Area: 1. (1) tortilla chips bag was open and sitting on top of a preparation table 2. (1) egg carton containing eggs was left on preparation counter/table uncovered and unrefrigerated 3. (1) marshmallow bag was opened and unlabeled laying on shelf under the preparation table 4. (4) eggs left in bowl on table with yellow substance on/under them 5. (1) container of basil leaves, only labeled with FIFO (first in first out) date 6. (1) container of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-07-07 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure trash/garbage cans were closed and in good repair. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all 71 residents, as listed on the facility census provided by the Administrator on 06/25/23, by attracting insects, rodents and animals to the facility. The findings are: A. On 06/25/23 at 9:08 am, during observation of the kitchen, four garbage cans (located outside of the kitchen) were observed to be without lids. B. On 06/29/23 at 11:00 am, during observation of the kitchen, the following was observed: 1. Three garbage cans had only partial lids, with part of the lid broken off. 2. One garbage can had no lid. 3. One rolling garbage can, contained a plastic liner that was filled to the top and untied, had no lid. C. On 06/29/23 at 11:18 am, during an interview with the Director of Dietary Services (DDS), she acknowledged that the garbage cans listed above were missing lids or had broken lids and unable to be closed completely.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-07 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the consultant pharmacist reviewed each resident's drug regimen for irregularities on a monthly basis for 5 (R #15, 34, 44, 48 and 172) of 5 (R #15, 34, 44, 48 and 172) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. If the facility fails to conduct monthly reviews, there is potential for residents to experience unnecessary drug interactions and potentially adverse side effects. The findings are: Resident #15: A. Record review of R #15's facility face sheet, dated 07/05/22, indicated the following diagnoses: Muscle Wasting And Atrophy (loss of muscle), Hypotension (low blood pressure), Lack Of Coordination, Seizures (involuntary muscle spasms), Iron Deficiency Anemia (low iron and red blood cell count), Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (high blood sugar), Hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol), Dementia (memory loss), Depressive Episodes (feeling of sadness), Hypertensive (high blood pressure) With Heart Failure (heart attack), Heart Failure, Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease (acid reflux), Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that 1 (R #18) of 1 (R #18) resident reviewed for falls was free from accidents and hazards by not providing the necessary equipment. This deficient practice could likely result in injuries and/or hospitalizations. The findings are: A. Record review of facility face sheet for R #18, dated 06/01/23, revealed admitting diagnoses which included: Fracture Of Left Femur (broken upper left leg), Heart Failure, Hypothyroidism (underactive thyroid), Extended Spectrum Beta Lactamase (ESBL) Resistance (difficulty in resistance to certain infections), Presence Of Left Artificial Hip Joint (new left hip), Urinary Tract Infection (bladder infection), Dementia (memory loss), Chronic Kidney Disease (low functioning kidneys), Hypertension (high blood pressure), Blindness in Left Eye, and History Of Falling. B. On 06/26/23 at 9:26 am, during an observation of R #18 revealed that she had a small bandage to the left upper forehead/temple area. C. Record review of R #18's 5 day Minimum Date Set (MDS) assessment, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-07 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolatedHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide services of a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week. This deficient practice could affect all 71 residents, as identified on the facility census list provided by the Administrator on 06/25/23, if the residents cannot maintain their highest achievable status of health, mobility, and mental functioning. The findings are: A. Record review of the posted nursing staff schedule for 07/05/23, revealed that the facility failed to schedule an RN to provide nursing care for that day. B. On 07/06/23 at 1:30 pm, during an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), she stated that there was RN coverage for 07/05/23 but that the facility had failed to document that on the posted nursing staff schedule. DON was unable to provide documentation to support this.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$99,368 in federal fines across 3 penalties.
- $36,895 — penalty dated 2024-09-10
- $41,861 — penalty dated 2024-03-13
- $20,612 — penalty dated 2023-12-22
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to OPCO SKILLED MANAGEMENT — 66 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.3 | -1.3 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 1.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
The other 65 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 65; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| CASA HEALTHCARE, LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 03/21/2023 |
| CALIBER ADVISORS LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 03/01/2023 |
| FIRST SWEETZER HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 03/01/2023 |
| HATTERAS INVESTMENTS LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 03/01/2023 |
| GARETZ, DAVID | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 03/01/2023 |
| GURWITZ, SOLOMON | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/17/2025 |
| HAGINS, ELIZABETH | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/17/2025 |
| KAPLAN, ESTHER | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/17/2025 |
| KAPLAN, MOSHA | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/17/2025 |
| MINDLE, ADAM | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/17/2025 |
| STERNSHEIN, JENNIFER | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2025 |
| UNGER, JEFFREY | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/17/2025 |
| ZIMMERMAN, CAROLINE | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2025 |
| 1601 S MAIN STREET NM, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2023 |
| CONTINUUM REHAB GROUP LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2023 |
| HALLMARK ADVISORS, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2023 |
| HANSEN HUNTER LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2024 |
| OPCO CA SKILLED MGMT INC. | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2023 |
| OPCO NM SKILLED MGMT, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2023 |
| THE WRIGHT GROUP CONSULTING, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2024 |
| WILSHIRE HEALTH REALTY, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2023 |
| BROWNING, RON | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/17/2024 |
| STOLARCZYK, LISA | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 23 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
12 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $3.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 29% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in NM
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New Mexico Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 325086. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.