No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Flagler Health And Rehabilitation Center

300 Dr Carter Boulevard, Bunnell, FL 32110 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (386) 437-4168 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (386) 437-4168 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
No harm-level citations or fines — but 15 lower-level deficiencies on record (see below)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (15) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (79%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • about 17% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2 McCormick Dr · (386) 246-7365 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
703 E Moody Blvd · (386) 437-3325 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1006 S State St · (386) 437-3813 · Call to confirm hours
Park
401 E Court St · (386) 437-7500 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased10.0%8.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight9.1%5.5%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.7%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%4.6%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.7%2.5%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened12.2%9.5%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication13.1%14.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%99.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.7%4.5%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control25.4%10.5%21.2%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table5.4%8.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.5%1.5%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine92.4%94.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission18.5%26.1%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.7%9.1%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.842.131.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.821.151.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 262 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

53.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
41.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.48U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.15hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.27hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 41.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 92 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.48 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 79% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 26% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF53.5%CMS range 47.1–58.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.2%CMS range 8.9–14.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge41.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge46.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge31.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge97.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.1%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.3%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.2%CMS range 4.3–10.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.011.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.49
RN hours/ resident / day
0.79
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.07
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.35
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.35
RN hoursweekends
78.6%
Total nursing turnover
89.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 99.3 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 21 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.35 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.49 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.07 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.10 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.45 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.55 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 79% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-12-04)
4
at the previous standard inspection (2023-12-21)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

15 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · F2025-12-04 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility staffing information, the facility failed to ensure that a Registered Nurse (RN), other than the Director of Nursing, provided services for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week when the resident census exceeded sixty (60) for two (11/09/25 and 11/23/25) of 29 days reviewed.The findings include:A review of the staffing assignment sheets for November 9, 2025, failed to identify an RN on the schedule, listing only Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN) for the 12 nursing staff assigned to provide patient care on all three shifts (Day, Evening, Night). Further review of the Unit assignment sheets for this day listed only staff identified on the assignment sheet, all of whom were LPNs.A review of the staffing assignment sheets for November 23, 2025, failed to identify an RN on the schedule, listing only LPNs for the 11 nursing staff assigned to provide patient care on all three shifts (Day, Evening, Night). Further review of the Unit assignment sheets for this day listed only staff identified on the assignment sheet, all of whom were LPNs.On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews with staff, the facility failed to label and date opened refrigerated food, maintain food preparation equipment in a clean and sanitary manner, and ensure canned goods intended for consumption were stored off the floor. Unsafe food storage and handling present the potential to affect all residents who consume foods prepared in the facility's kitchen. The findings include:During an initial kitchen tour with the Director of Dietary Services (DDS) on 12/01/2025 at 10:20 AM, the walk-in refrigerator was found to contain two steam table pans containing a thick brown substance resembling gravy. Each was covered with clear plastic wrap, but neither was labeled with a date that the gravy was opened and dished into the pans. A block of orange pre-sliced cheese was opened, partially used and wrapped loosely in plastic wrap so that the cheese was exposed to air. There was no label or date on the cheese. Two packages of opened and partially used cold cut meats were wrapped and unlabeled. In reach-in refrigerator #1, a plastic bowl filled with unidentifiable,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-04 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, medical record review, and facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to ensure accurate administration of time-sensitive medications, specifically insulin ordered to be administered before breakfast, for five (Residents #46, #120, #10, #119, and #108) of seven residents reviewed who had medications ordered to be administered prior to breakfast.The findings include:On December 3, 2025 at 5:40 a.m., Registered Nurse (RN) C was advised that her medication pass would be observed. RN C stated, Oh, I finished already. If I knew you were coming, I would have waited for you. She was asked whether any residents had received insulin that morning, and she confirmed that Resident #10 had received two units of sliding-scale regular insulin at approximately 5:30 a.m. She was asked what time breakfast was served on the unit and she stated approximately 7:00 a.m. She confirmed that the insulin order was written to be administered before breakfast.On December 3, 2025 at 5:50 a.m., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) D and LPN V confirmed they had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to provide activities of daily living (ADL) care (specifically fingernail care) for two (Residents #54 and #90) of two dependent residents sampled for ADL care. The findings include: 1.On 12/01/2025 at 11:30 am, Resident #54 was observed lying in bed awake. His fingernails were elongated and jagged on both hands. He was asked if he preferred his fingernails that long. He replied no and stated, I need to do something about them. They used to take care of them for me here, but they don't anymore. I think the girl that used to do them left. (Photographic evidence obtained) On 12/02/2025 at 9:30 am, Resident #54 was observed lying in bed with his eyes closed. He did not respond to his name being called. His fingernails remained elongated and jagged, as they were observed yesterday, 12/01/2025, at 11:30 am. On 12/02/2025 at 11:25 am, Resident #54 was observed in his room, lying in bed awake. His fingernails remained elongated and jagged. He stated he wished they would trim his…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the timely assessment and implementation of appropriate care orders for surgical wounds for two (Residents #64 and #108) of two residents sampled for surgical wounds.The findings include: 1.On 12/02/25 at 11:04 AM, an interview was conducted with Resident #64, during which he stated his dressings had not been changed since he was admitted and he had staples in his chest that were supposed to come out. He stated he had knee surgery, and no one had changed his dressing there either. On 12/03/25 at 10:04 AM, a follow-up interview was conducted with Resident #64, during which he stated the dressing to his left chest had not been changed since October 23, 2025. Observation of the bandage revealed no date written to identify when it had last been changed. The resident also offered that the dressing change on his left leg had been performed on 12/2/25 for the first time. He reported that he had been told today that he had a follow-up…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, medical record and facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to ensure that two (Residents #4 and #95) of two residents reviewed for continuous oxygen therapy, out of three residents who received continuous oxygen therapy, received oxygen as ordered and consistent with professional standards of practice. The findings include:1.An observation was made of Resident #4 was on 12/01/2025 at 1:15 PM. He was in bed eating lunch with a nasal cannula in place and his oxygen (O2) concentrator running. The concentrator was delivering oxygen at a rate of 4 liters per minute (LPM). When asked what his orders for O2 were, Resident #4 stated he was supposed to receive oxygen at 4 LPM. On 12/04/2025 at 10:30 AM, Resident #4 was observed in bed eating breakfast with the nasal cannula in place. Oxygen was flowing at a rate of 4 LPM. An interview was conducted with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) P on 12/04/2025 at 10:46 AM. She explained that Resident #4 received continuous O2 at a rate of 2 LPM. She reviewed the record and verified that O2 delivery…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of resident records and interviews with staff, the facility failed to 1) Ensure that one resident's (#110) medications were held according to the physician's prescribed parameters, and 2) Ensure sufficient monitoring for one resident (#77) receiving psychotropic medication for mood and behavior, from a total of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include: 1.A review of Resident #110's medical record revealed that he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and then readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including hypotension. Further review of the record revealed a physician's order dated December 1, 2025 which read: Midodrine 10 mg (milligrams), give one tablet by mouth every eight hours as needed for a systolic blood pressure of less than 100. A review of Resident #110's December 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed the following blood pressure readings documented in association with Midodrine 10 mg signed off as having been administered: On December 1,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews with dietary staff, the facility failed to ensure the area surrounding the commercial trash dumpsters was clean and free of debris, and that all waste was contained inside the receptacle. The findings include:As part of the initial tour of the kitchen with the Director of Dietary Services (DDS) on 12/01/2025 AM at 10:20 AM, the commercial dumpsters behind the building were inspected. The grassy and wooded area around and behind the dumpsters was observed with scattered debris including used and inverted blue medical gloves, paper, plastic bottles, baggies and cup lids, a foam to-go food container, a cup and other food containers. The DDS acknowledged the scattered trash but stated she was not sure who was responsible for cleaning it up. She wasn't sure who was responsible for maintaining the dumpster area. During another visit to the dumpster area with the visiting DDS from a sister facility on 12/04/2025 at 10:32 AM, the dumpster area was found in the same condition as during the 12/01/2025 observation at 10:20 AM, with trash strewn about. He…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP) requirements for Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) use during high-contact resident care activities for one (Resident #30) of three residents sampled for review of Enhanced Barrier Precautions.The findings include:On 12/03/25 at 12:54 PM, an observation was made of the Wound Care Nurse who was providing care to Resident #30's left shoulder wound. The Wound Care Nurse was assisted by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) J, who assisted with turning the resident. A blue dressing was noted on the resident's left shoulder that was dated 12/01/25. At this time the Wound Care Nurse stated she had changed the dressing yesterday (12/02/25) but had gotten the date wrong on the dressing. Neither the nurse nor the CNA wore PPE as directed on the EBP notice on the outside of the resident's room. A supply bin with PPE was noted on the exterior of the room. (Photographic evidence obtained)On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on kitchen food service observations, staff interviews, facility document review and facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to follow proper sanitation and food handling practices to prevent the outbreak of foodborne illness. The facility failed to ensure that the dietary staff practiced the proper procedures for hand hygiene, disposable glove use, food storage and proper sanitation practices in the kitchen. Hand hygiene, food handling and sanitation is important in health care settings serving nursing home residents due to the risk of serious complications from foodborne illness as a result of their compromised health status. Unsafe food handling practices represent a potential source of pathogen exposure. This had the potential to impact any resident receiving food from the facility. The findings include: During the first tour of the facility kitchen on 12/18/2023 at 10:12 AM one of the reach-in freezers located in a back hallway of the kitchen, had large blocks of frozen ice built up on the inside of the unit covering packages of food products. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 5 citations
  • Potential for harm · F2023-12-21 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on kitchen food service observations, staff interviews, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure that all mechanical equipment in the kitchen was maintained in a safe operating condition. This failure had the potential to impact any resident receiving food from the facility's kitchen. The findings include: During the first tour of the facility kitchen on 12/18/2023 at 10:12 AM the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) participated in the tour. Dietary Aide F was observed operating the dish machine. The wash cycle temperature was 110 degrees Fahrenheit ('F). Three loads were observed and the temperature did not change. The chlorine bleach sanitizer level was tested and resulted in 100 parts per million (ppm). Employee F did not know the wash cycle temperature was only 110'F. She stated that it was 130'F when she started washing dishes this morning. She stated that it was supposed to be 120'F or higher. Review of the dish machine temperature log revealed the wash cycle had been recorded to be 130'F and the wash cycle was recorded to be 130'F. During a tour of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one (Resident #72) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL), from a total sample of 32 residents, received adequate and appropriate nail care to maintain personal hygiene. The findings include: On 12/18/23 at 11:45 AM, Resident #72 was observed resting in her room. The resident's fingernails extended approximately three quarters of an inch from the edge of the nail bed. The nails were yellow with dirt accumulated at the bottom edge of the nail bed. The resident explained that she did not like her nails so long and repeatedly asked members of facility staff to trim them. The resident could not recall a specific name of facility staff who she asked to trim her nails and said she asked several certified nursing assistants (CNAs) and licensed practical nurses (LPNs). (Photographic evidence obtained) On 12/21/23 at 10:00 AM, a second observation was made of the resident resting in bed with eyes her closed.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-21 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one (Resident#33) of four residents receiving enteral feedings received adequate nutrition as prescribed. There were 32 residents in the total sample. Failure to provide enteral nutrition as prescribed could result in caloric deficit and eventual malnutrition. The findings include: During a tour on 12/19/23 at 10:12 am, Resident #33 was observed lying in bed. He was receiving tube feeding Jevity 1.5 cal at 60 milliliters per hour ml/hr. (Photographic evidence obtained) Another observation was made on 12/19/23 3:27 pm. Resident #33 was observed receiving Jevity 1.5 cal at 60 ml/hr. On 12/20/23 at 9:08 am, Resident #33 was observed in bed lying supine with the head of the bed elevated at 30 degrees. Jevity 1.5 was running at 60 ml/hr. (Photographic evidence obtained) In an interview on 12/20/23 at 9:28 am, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) C stated she was assigned to Resident #33. When asked about the resident's tube feeding…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-03 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure it provided appropriate restorative services to maintain or improve the ability to carry out the activities of daily living for one (Resident #39) of one resident sampled for restorative care, out of a total sample of 36 residents. This placed resident #39 at risk for functional decline. The findings include: A review of clinical records for Resident #39 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia without behavioral disturbance, congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease, major depressive disorder, and hypertension. The resident required limited assistance with walking by staff. A review of Resident #39's significant change minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, indicating cognitively intact. The assessment included his activities of daily living (ADL's) which revealed walking…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-03 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records in accordance with professional standards for one (Resident #7) of one resident sampled for mobility, from a total sample of 36 residents. The findings include: A record review for Resident #7 revealed an admission date of 06/25/18, with diagnoses including dementia without behavioral disturbance, type 2 diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, generalized anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, hypertension, tremor, edema, and anemia. A review of Resident #7's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/22/22 revealed a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 06, indicating severe cognitive impairment. A review of Resident #7's current physician's orders dated October 18, 2021, read: knee immobilizer to left leg every shift with no discontinuation date observed. On 01/31/22 at 10:00 AM, Resident #7 was observed in hallway by her room, self-propelling in a wheelchair. She was observed dressed for day without an immobilizer on her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ASTON HEALTH — 38 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.7-0.7 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 52.2-1.2 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.1+0.9 vs chain
The other 37 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.7★, per CMS)
1 of 5Crescent Health And Rehabilitation CenterSarasota, FL 1 of 5Kensington Gardens Rehab And Nursing CenterClearwater, FL 1 of 5Nursing & Rehabilitation Center Of New Port RicheyNew Port Richey, FL 1 of 5Oak Haven Rehab And Nursing CenterAuburndale, FL 1 of 5Vero Beach Care CenterVero Beach, FL 2 of 5Baya Pointe Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterLake City, FL 2 of 5Capri Health And Rehabilitation CenterVenice, FL 2 of 5Creekside Health And Rehabilitation CenterSarasota, FL 2 of 5Fairway Oaks CenterTampa, FL 2 of 5Haines City Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterHaines City, FL 2 of 5Highlands Lake CenterLakeland, FL 2 of 5Indian River CenterWest Melbourne, FL 2 of 5North Port Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterNorth Port, FL 2 of 5Pensacola Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterPensacola, FL 2 of 5Riverwood CenterJacksonville, FL 2 of 5Sandgate Gardens Rehab And Nursing CenterFort Pierce, FL 2 of 5Sea Breeze Rehab And Nursing CenterVero Beach, FL 2 of 5Tierra Pines CenterLargo, FL 2 of 5Viera Del Mar Health And Rehabilitation CenterViera, FL 2 of 5Winter Garden Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterWinter Garden, FL 3 of 5Cedarbrook Health And Rehabilitation CenterFort Myers, FL 3 of 5Coquina CenterOrmond Beach, FL 3 of 5Eagleridge Health And Rehabilitation CenterFort Myers, FL 3 of 5Fouraker Hills Rehab And Nursing CenterJacksonville, FL 3 of 5Hillside Health And Rehabilitation CenterZephyrhills, FL 3 of 5Oakpark Health And Rehabilitation CenterPalm Harbor, FL 4 of 5Bridgeview CenterOrmond Beach, FL 4 of 5Coastal Health And Rehabilitation CenterDaytona Beach, FL 4 of 5Debary Health And Rehabilitation CenterDebary, FL 4 of 5Fernandina Beach Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterFernandina Beach, FL 4 of 5Island Lake CenterLongwood, FL 4 of 5Meadowpark Health And Rehabilitation CenterDunedin, FL 4 of 5Parkside Health And Rehabilitation CenterDeland, FL 4 of 5Ruleme CenterEustis, FL 4 of 5Seaside Health And Rehabilitation CenterDaytona Beach, FL 5 of 5Bayview CenterEustis, FL 5 of 5Osprey Point Nursing CenterBushnell, FL

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
FLAGLER PINES OPERATIONS HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 08/13/2020
BLUE SPRING HEALTHCARE PARTNERS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 08/13/2020
FRIEDMAN, LEOPOLDIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/01/2026
GUTMAN, SAMUELIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 08/13/2020
WILDES, DONNAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/28/2025
CANIDATE, DELANAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/09/2025
JARDINE, TAMMYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 11/03/2020
MARTINEZ IRIZARRY, AXELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2025
WOTHERS, EILEENIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/29/2025
ASTON HEALTHCARE LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2022

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$13.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+1.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.3M
Related-party expense17% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 50%Medicare 16%Other / private 34%

This home reported $2.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$333per resident / day
operating cost
$10,112per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$338per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Florida
$10,342/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,610/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 105547. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-04, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next