Capri Health And Rehabilitation Center
1450 East Venice Avenue, Venice, FL 34292 · For profit - Corporation · 129 certified beds · (941) 486-8088 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (35) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $89,544 in federal fines (most recent 2024-02-01)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 13.8% | 8.7% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.7% | 5.5% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.7% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 4.6% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.2% | 2.5% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 13.3% | 9.5% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 20.6% | 14.4% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 99.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.9% | 4.5% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 18.4% | 10.5% | 21.2% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 17.5% | 8.6% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.6% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 79.7% | 94.7% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 23.1% | 26.1% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 5.3% | 9.1% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.21 | 2.13 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.38 | 1.15 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
49.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 279 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 52.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 84 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.41 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 70% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 40% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 49.1%CMS range 43.4–55.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.5%CMS range 8.2–13.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 52.4% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 40.5% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 50.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.9% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.2% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.5%CMS range 4.3–12.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.08 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 129 beds and averages 108.9 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 20 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.53 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.45 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.14 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.18 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.68 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.50 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
5 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
35 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2022-08-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of facility's policy and procedure, staff, and resident interview the facility failed to implement a systemic approach to identify risk factors and implement appropriate interventions to prevent avoidable fall related serious injuries for 5 (Resident #20, #85, #193, #392, and #292) and 2 (Resident #27, and #192) with multiple falls, of 10 residents sampled with falls or fall related injuries. Resident #20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was dependent on staff for repositioning. On 1/22/22 the resident rolled out of bed during care and sustained a nasal bone fracture. Resident #85 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was assessed to be at risk for falls. On 2/5/22 and 5/14/22 the resident sustained a fall resulting respectively in a fractured hip and wrist and acute head injury. Resident #193 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] after a fall, and repair of right hip fracture. On 1/10/22 the resident sustained a fall resulting in a dislocation of the right hip…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2022-08-01 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — patternAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff, and resident interview the facility administration failed to use its resources effectively to ensure consistent and ongoing implementation of effective measures to prevent avoidable falls and fall related injuries. Resident #193 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] after a fall, and repair of right hip fracture. On 1/10/22 the resident sustained a fall resulting in dislocation of the right hip prosthesis. On 1/22/22 Resident #20 sustained a nasal bone fracture when she was improperly turned in bed and fell. Resident #85 sustained multiple falls at the facility on 1/28/22, 2/5/22, 3/26/22, 3/30/22 and 5/14/22. On 2/5/22 Resident #85 was diagnosed with a left femoral neck, and left wrist fracture, left facial abrasion and contusion. On 5/14/22 Resident #85 was sent to the hospital after the fall and diagnosed with an acute head injury. On 2/20/22 the facility developed a performance improvement plan to address the increase in falls and fall related injuries. The facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2022-08-01 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to develop and implement appropriate plans of action to correct identified quality deficiencies related to prevention of avoidable falls and fall related serious injuries. On 1/22/22 Resident #20 sustained a nasal bone fracture when she was improperly turned in bed and fell. Resident #193 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] after a fall, and repair of right hip fracture. On 1/10/22 the resident sustained a fall resulting in dislocation of the right hip prosthesis. Resident #85 sustained multiple falls at the facility on 1/28/22, 2/5/22, 3/26/22, 3/30/22 and 5/14/22. On 2/5/22 Resident #85 sustained a fall, was sent to the hospital and diagnosed with a left femoral neck fracture, left wrist fracture, left facial abrasion and contusion. On 5/14/22 Resident #85 was sent to the hospital after the fall and diagnosed with an acute head injury. Resident #292 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident was assessed to be at risk for falls. On 6/11/22…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-03-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, policy and procedures review, staff and resident interviews the facility failed to protect residents' rights to be free from verbal and physical abuse for 3 (Residents #700, #650, and #800) of 3 sampled residents. The findings included: The facility policy Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, Mistreatment and Injury of Unknown Origin issued 8/22 (revised 10/22) documented Our residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, exploitation and mistreatment . Patients with needs and behaviors that might lead to conflict with staff or other residents will be identified by the Interdisciplinary Care Planning Team, with interventions and follow through designed to minimize the risk of conflict . Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #999 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Dementia and Major Depressive Disorder. On 12/23/23 the diagnosis list was updated to include adjustment disorder and dementia with behavioral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and observation, the facility failed to implement policies and procedures to investigate allegations of abuse and neglect for 1 of 2 (#1) residents sampled. The findings included: A policy on Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, Mistreatment, and Injury of Unknown Origin (ANEMMI) last revised on 1/24 which stated that the Center will seek and accept concerns, complaints, or grievances from residents, resident families and staff without reprisal. The right to report a concern or incident is not limited to a formal, written grievance process, but includes any verbalized complaint to any facility staff member. Any resident event that is reported to any staff by resident, family, or their staff or any other person will be considered as possible ANEMMI if it meets any of the following criteria: A. Any resident or family complaint of physical harm, pain or mental anguish resulting from willful infliction from others. Any and all staff observing or hearing about such events must report the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure housekeeping and maintenance services to maintain a safe, functional, sanitary and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public on the first and second floor of the facility. The findings included: During a tour of the facility on 9/24/24 at 5:00 p.m., the following environmental observations were made: A black substance was observed on the ceiling vents and surrounding ceiling tiles of the Capri reading room, the first floor hallway near the elevator, and the Social Service Office on the second floor 2nd floor. Photographic evidence obtained. The floor and cove base of the first floor hallway near the nourishment room, the first floor hallway near the central bath, the memory care near the speech therapy room, and near room [ROOM NUMBER] were in poor repair, cracked and separating. Photographic evidence obtained. The wallpaper was peeling from wall with orange discoloration coming through the paper in the memory care near the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a resident centered care plan to meet the needs of 1 (Resident #45) of 3 residents reviewed with impaired hearing. The findings included: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included mixed conductive and sensorineural hearing loss, and cochlear implant (Surgically implanted device that helps people with severe to profound hearing loss perceive sound) status. Review of the Significant Change in Status Assessment with a target date of 8/26/24 revealed Resident #45's hearing was highly impaired with absence of useful hearing. Resident #45's cognition was moderately impaired with a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 09. The care plan initiated on 10/16/23 and revised on 10/26/23 noted Resident #45 had a communication problem related to hearing deficit. Per the resident's family, the cochlear implant has stopped working. The care plan initiated on 10/9/23 noted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-26 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, review of facility policy, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to consistently apply a physician ordered orthotic device to prevent the decline in range of motion for 1 (Resident #32) of 1 resident reviewed with contractures (rigidity of joint). The findings included: The facility policy Standards and Guidelines : Physician Orders documented Physician orders should be followed as prescribed, and if not followed, this should be recorded in the resident's medical record during that shift. Physician should be notified and the responsible party if indicated. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #32 had an admission date of 12/10/22 with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease, anxiety and muscle weakness. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) (standardized assessment tool that measures health status in nursing home residents) with an assessment reference date of 9/7/24 documented Resident #32 was dependent on staff for activities of daily…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, review of facility policy and procedures, record review, staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to meet the needs for 3 (Resident #999, #875 and #900) of 5 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). The findings included: The facility policy Standards and Guidelines : ADL Care and Services issued 4/2020 (revised 1/2024) documented :Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition grooming and personal and oral hygiene . Residents will be provided with care treatment and services to ensure that their activities of daily living are met . Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADL's independently, with the consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care including appropriate support and assistance with hygiene bathing dressing grooming nail care and oral care . The resident has the right to refuse any and all ADL care the refusal of care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-26 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — patternProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, review of facility policy and procedures and resident and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure pain medications were provided in accordance with professional standards of practice and physician orders for 2 (Resident #99 and #399) of 3 residents reviewed for pain management. The findings included: The facility policy Medication Administration issued 10/2020 (revised 1/2024) specified: medications are ordered and administered safely and as prescribed. The director of nursing services directs all personnel who administer medications and or have related functions. Medications are administered in accordance with prescribed orders, including any required time limit. If a drug is withheld, refused, or given at a time other than the schedule time, the individual administering the medication shall document the rationale in the residence medical record and notify the physician and responsible party if indicated. 1. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #99 had an admission date of 9/29/23 with diagnoses including colon cancer, rheumatoid arthritis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of facility policy and procedures and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a clean, safe and sanitary environment for residents in 6 (Rooms 110, 113, 114, 116, 118 and 119) of 17 rooms observed on the Memory Care Unit. The findings included: On 6/24/24 at 9:30 a.m., during an initial tour on the Memory Care Unit the following was observed: 1. room [ROOM NUMBER]. In the bathroom there was a bed pan on the floor next to the toilet, a wash basin wedged between the toilet and the wall. There was a container of disinfecting wipes behind the toilet on the floor with a soiled washcloth. Photographic evidence obtained. 2. room [ROOM NUMBER]. The bathroom had cracks in the tiles, brown and black grime on the tiles surrounding the base of the toilet. Photographic evidence obtained. 3. room [ROOM NUMBER] A. Multiple bottle of lotion, cream and sprays were stored in two wash basins on the nightstand. Photographic evidence obtained. 4. room [ROOM NUMBER] B. Bottle of body lotion,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-26 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy and procedures, record review, staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to ensure each resident who is incontinent of urine is identified, assessed and provided appropriate incontinent care for 2(Resident #999 and #900) of 3 residents reviewed with incontinence. The findings included: The facility policy Standards and Guidelines : ADL Care and Services issued 4/2020 (revised 1/2024) documented :Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs)independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition grooming and personal and oral hygiene. Residents will be provided with care treatment and services to ensure that their activities of daily living are met. Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADL's (activities of daily living) independently, with the consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care including appropriate support and assistance with hygiene and elimination(toileting). 1.Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, review of facility policy and procedures, review of clinical records and staff and resident interview, the facility failed to secure all medications in a locked storage compartment and failed to ensure 1 medication cart (East wing) of 5 medication carts was secured and locked when out of the direct supervision of the nurse. The findings included: The facility policy Medication Storage and Labeling issued 3/2021 (revised 01/2024) specified The facility stores all drugs and biological's in a safe, secure, and orderly manner. Drugs and biological's used in the facility are stored in locked compartments under proper temperature, light, and humidity controls. Only persons authorized to prepare and administer medications have access to locked medications. 1. On 6/24/24 at 2:25 p.m., during an observation on the second floor, the medication cart on the East Wing was observed unlocked, and unattended. Two nurses were observed standing in the East hallway talking. The medication cart was not under direct observation of the nurses. One resident was observed in a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-04 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interview the facility failed to report significant changes in behaviors to the appropriate state agencies for a level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) for 1 (Resident #999) of 3 residents reviewed with newly diagnosed psychiatric disorder. The findings included: Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #999 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Dementia and Major Depressive Disorder. A level I PASRR screen form dated 10/13/23 documented No diagnosis or suspicion of serious mental illness or intellectual disability indicated. Level II PASRR evaluation not required. On 11/1/23 at 12:02 p.m., the nurse's progress note documented Husband/family alerted this nurse to concerns of increased agitation and sadness/hopelessness. Resident assessed for suicidal ideation by 2 nurses, none noted, resident denied thoughts or plans. The physician was notified and ordered Citalopram (Antidepressant) 10 milligrams (mg) a day and a Psychiatric…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 21 citations
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-01 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure clinical records contained complete and accurate documentation of care provided for 2 (Residents #1 and #3) of 3 residents reviewed for accuracy of clinical records. The findings included: 1. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/2/23 noted the resident's cognition was severely impaired with a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 00. The MDS noted Resident #1 was severely cognitively impaired with a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 0. Resident #1 used a manual wheelchair for mobility, was frequently incontinent of urine and always incontinent of bowel. The current physician orders included to assist the resident with all meals. No assistance with meals was documented in the clinical record on 1/3/24, 1/7/24, 1/16/24, 1/17/24, 1/21/24 or 1/24/24. The physician's orders also included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure a safe, functional, and comfortable environment for residents in 9 (room [ROOM NUMBER], 226, 227,228, 229, 231, 232, 239, 230) of 31 rooms observed by failure to store personal items in a sanitary manner, failure to repair walls and peeling wallpaper, failure to secure exposed cable wires. The findings included: Review of Promedica Senior Care AM Care procedure- #19 Return equipment to designated area and clean/dispose as indicated. #20 Verify that personal items are stored separately in closed, labeled containers. On 7/24/22 at 10:12 a.m., observation revealed an uncovered, unlabeled wash basin was sitting on the toilet of bathroom [ROOM NUMBER]. On 7/24/22 at 10:15 a.m., observation revealed several personal care items including bed pans and wash basins were unlabeled and uncovered in bathroom of room [ROOM NUMBER]. One bedpan was on the floor, one bedpan was tucked between the grab bar and wall behind the toilet and 2 wash basins were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-08-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to report alleged violations which could constitute neglect, resulting in serious bodily injury for 4 residents (#20, #85, #292, and #392) of 9 residents reviewed. The findings included: The facility's policy titled Patient Protection, Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment, and Misappropriation Prevention dated 10/2021 noted neglect is the failure of the facility, its employees or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress. Ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury to the Administrator of the facility and to other officials including to the State Survey Agency. 1. On 7/24/22 at 10:33 a.m., Resident #20…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-08-01 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and highest practicable physical and mental well-being for 5 residents (#60, #56, #16, #34 and #20) of 19 residents reviewed. The findings included: Review of the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services (CMS) Staff Posting Report dated 7/24/22 indicated Resident Census was 94 during the 7:00 a.m. through 3:00 p.m. shift. Review of the Florida Calculating State Minimum Nursing Staff for Long Term Care Facilities form for 7/24/22 indicated Resident Census was 93. The Daily average of 1.8587 CNA hours per resident. On 7/25/22 at 11:49 a.m. Resident #60 said call bell response is at between 15 to 20 minutes. On 7/24/22 at 2:02 p.m., Resident #56 said she was left on the toilet for a long time. Resident #56 said it takes staff a while to answer the call light because they are short-staffed. She said it depends on how many staff are at the facility, it can take 20 minutes or longer for them to answer. On 7/25/22 at 12:06 p.m.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the safe storage of medications left at residents' bedside for 3 (Resident #144, #62 and #20) of 3 residents observed with unsecured medications at the bedside. The findings included: Review of facility policy Medication and Treatment Administration Guidelines policy dated 7/2006 and updated 3/2018 stated on page 3, under Medication Storage and Security, . Self-administered medication stored in a patient's room must be secured in a locked storage unit. On 7/24/22 at 12:09 p.m., observed one Fluticasone Propionate (Flonase) 50 micrograms nasal spray, two Albuterol Sulfate HFA inhalers, and one tube Nystatin Triamcinolone Acetonide (antifungal) cream unsecured on Resident #144's bedside table. On 7/25/22 at 1:34 p.m., observed one Fluticasone Propionate 50 mcg nasal spray, two Albuterol Sulfate HFA inhalers, and one tube Nystatin Triamcinolone Acetonide cream unsecured on Resident #144's bedside table. Resident #144…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-08-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, review of facility policy and procedure and staff interviews, the facility failed to label and date food in 1 (first floor) of 2 nourishment rooms. The facility failed to ensure food was prepared in a sanitary manner. The failure to label and date foods stored in the refrigerator can cause residents to consume food that may have expired. The findings included: The facility policy Food from Outside Sources and In-Room Refrigerators (revised 11/2017) documented Food requiring refrigeration and non-perishable items are stored in labeled (with patient's name and date) closed containers. 1. On 7/24/22 at 11:39 a.m., observation of the first-floor nourishment room, reach-in refrigerator with the Dietary Manager revealed the following: Three unlabeled and undated sandwiches. Photographic evidence obtained. The Dietary Manager confirmed the observations and said, the sandwiches should not be in the refrigerator without a label and date. On 7/25/22 at 11:50 a.m., the Dietary Manager said the dietary staff were trained upon hire and as needed, on dating and labeling food…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-01 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, review of policy and procedure, resident and staff interview, the facility failed to have documentation of an interdisciplinary evaluation to determine the ability to safely self-administer medications for 1 (Residents #144) of 3 residents observed with unsecured medications at the bedside. The findings included: The facility's Medication Administration: Self-Administration of Medications policy dated 11/2017 stated the purpose of the policy is to provide guidance for the patients, wishing to self-administer medications. The policy stated the resident has the right to self-administer medication if the interdisciplinary team (IDT) has determined the medication(s) is clinically appropriate, the resident's cognitive status, the resident's capacity to follow directions of when the medication needs to be taken, the safety and appropriateness of the medication(s), and the resident's ability to ensure the medication(s) are stored safely and securely after use. The decision to allow…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-01 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments in the areas of discharge status, fall and elopement device use for 2 (Resident #94 and #52) of 13 reviewed for MDS accuracy. The findings included: The Resident Assessment Instrument manual (October 2019) noted identification of residents who are at high risk of falling is a top priority for care planning. A previous fall is the most important predictor of risk for future falls. Falls are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among nursing home residents. The steps for assessment noted to review nursing home incident reports, fall logs and the medical record. Code one if the resident had one non-injurious fall since admission or reentry or prior assessment. 1. On 7/24/22 at 4:04 p.m., Clinical review indicated Resident #52 admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of Dementia, Essential tremors, and repeated falls. On 7/24/22 at 4:15 p.m., review of fall assessment revealed Resident #52 had a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-01 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Residents #80) of 1 resident's activity program reviewed had received and/or engaged in their activities of choice as identified in their activity/recreational assessment. The failure to ensure each resident is engaged in an activity program of their choice has a potential to cause loneliness and mental anguish for the resident. The findings included: On 7/24/22 at 9:56 a.m., Resident #80 was observed in his bedroom in a hospital gown not involved in an activity program. Further observation noted the television (TV) was not on nor was there a radio playing music for Resident #80. On 7/24/22 at 10:00 a.m., in an interview, Resident #80 said there is nothing to do at the facility and he doesn't remember the last time he had been invited and/or attended an activity program. On 7/24/22 at 1:00 p.m. and 3:00 p.m., Resident #80 was observed in his bedroom wearing a hospital gown not involved in an activity program.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-01 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of facility's policy and procedure, and staff interview, the facility failed to have documentation of consistent and accurate monitoring of fluid intake for 1(Resident #56) of 1 resident with a physician's ordered fluid restriction. The findings included: The facility policy Fluid Restrictions, Description and Rationale (8/2019) documented, Fluid restrictions are sometimes used for patients with renal failure, congestive heart failure and hyponatremia, or other condition requiring that intake of fluids be minimized. Specific total fluid restrictions are ordered by the physician and communicated to the dietary department. Developing a fluid restriction plan based on a patient's preference and physician order may assist in meeting the patient's hydration needs and compliance with physician's orders. Review of Resident #56's clinical record showed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of legal blindness, anxiety, edema, urinary tract infection and hypertension. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-01 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure they maintained ongoing communication between the nursing facility and the dialysis center related to the ongoing assessment of a dialysis resident before, during, and after each dialysis treatment for 2 Residents (#25 and #34) of 2 residents receiving dialysis. The findings included: 1. Review of Resident #34's clinical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #34's diagnoses included end stage renal disease. The physician's orders included hemodialysis Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays at a local outpatient dialysis center. The care plan for renal insufficiencies revised on 3/3/22 noted to coordinate dialysis care with the dialysis treatment center. On 7/25/22 at 11:14 a.m., Resident #34 said she goes to the dialysis center on Monday, Wednesday, and Fridays. She said the nursing facility and dialysis center do not always communicate with each other. She said she carries a three-ring dialysis binder…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-01 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of facility policy and procedure and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure 2 licensed Practical Nurses (LPN) (LPN E and LPN F) of 4 LPN nursing staff had the appropriate competencies and skill set to administer intravenous (IV) medications. The findings included: Review of Florida Nursing Board Chapter 64B9-12 Competency and Knowledge Requirements Necessary to Qualify Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) to Administer IV Therapy. Contents: the board endorses the Intravenous Therapy Course Guidelines issued by the Education Department of the National Federation of Licensed Practical Nurse November 1983. With specific education and competency requirements for LPNs to administer IV medications. The facility policy IIA4 Infusion Therapy Products, General Information (undated) stated Licensed staff are responsible for following applicable state laws, practice act, .issued by the state licensing board; as well as, applicable Pro-[NAME] Senior Care policy, to assist in exercising…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-01 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, policy review and staff interviews, the facility failed to act on consultant pharmacy recommendations for 1 (Resident #17) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. This has the potential for delay of treatment and use of unnecessary medications. The findings included: Review of the Policy Medication Regimen Review (MRR) (effective date 1/1/08, revised 8/2018) showed the Nursing Center's Consultant Pharmacist will present MRR recommendations on individual patient specific reports on the day of their review. The process to ensure MRR recommendations are addressed timely. Review of physician's orders for Resident #17 indicated an active order for Paxil 40 milligrams(mg), 1 tablet a day on 9/28/21. Review of MRR for Resident #17 revealed a Gradual Dose Reduction (GDR) recommendation on 3/28/22: Consider a trial gradual dose reduction to Paxil 30 milligrams (mg) daily. Review of Resident #17's Medication Administration Records for March 2022 thru July 2022 revealed no dose reduction for Paxil 40 mg. On 7/26/22 at 11:02 a.m., the Director of Nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-01-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, sanitary, and homelike environment as evidenced by dry wall damage in residents' rooms on the second floor, ceiling tile and wall damage in the second floor shower room and a broken elevator button. Failure to identify and complete needed repairs could cause a safety and sanitary hazards to vulnerable residents. The findings included: On 1/25/21 at approximately 9:00 a.m., an environmental tour was conducted, and the following resident's room and facility damages were noted: 1. rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] on the wall across from the residents' beds the dry wall was damaged and some of the areas which had been patched were not painted as required. Photographic Evidence Obtained 2. room [ROOM NUMBER] on the wall across from the residents' beds the drywall was damaged and the paint was peeling in multiple areas. Photographic Evidence Obtained 3. room [ROOM NUMBER] on the wall across from the residents'…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-01-28 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to have documentation in the residents' medical record the physicians and/or nurse practitioners reviewed and addressed the pharmacist's recommendations for 2 (Residents #1 and Resident # 2) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy (Number 52) Medication Regimen Review (dated October 2017) read: d) The attending physician documents the review and any resulting actions or orders on the MRR [Medication Regimen Review] . 1. Review of the clinical record revealed the pharmacy consultant completed a Medication Regimen Review (MRR) for Resident #2 on 11/13/20 and 12/10/20. These MRRs identified irregularities and recommendations were made. The clinical record lacked documentation the attending physician reviewed and addressed the recommendations. On 1/27/21 at 12:28 p.m., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Unit Manager (UM) Staff F said the pharmacy recommendations went to the Director of Nursing (DON) and she gave them to the Unit Managers (UM).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-01-28 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, diet census report, facility provided menu for review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure 10 (Residents #2, #13, #25, #32, #39, #44, #51, #275, #276, and #324) of 10 residents received a wheat roll for lunch. The failure to follow the menu could potentially cause significant unintentional weight loss. The findings included: On 1/28/21 9:15 a.m., review of the Diet Order Census showed the following: Resident #2 had an order for an Enhanced Mechanical Soft diet. Resident #13 had an order for an Enhanced Regular Diet. Resident #25 had a diet order for a CHO Controlled/NAS (Carbohydrate Controlled/No added Salt) diet. Resident #32 had a diet order for an Enhanced/ NAS diet (Enhanced No Added Salt). Resident #39 had a diet order for a Mechanical Soft diet. Resident #44 had a diet order for CHO Controlled/NAS (Controlled Carbohydrate/No Added Salt) diet. Resident #51 had a diet order for CHO Controlled/NAS (Carbohydrate Controlled, No Added Salt) diet. Resident #275 had a diet order for CHO Controlled/NAS (Carbohydrate Controlled/No Added Salt) diet.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-01-28 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide urinary bag covers to promote resident dignity for 2 (Residents #275 and #276) of 2 residents reviewed. The findings included: The facility's guidelines for Catheter Care titled Indwelling Catheter with a revision date of 4/2019 read Note: Catheter bags should be covered with a catheter dignity bag to preserve the dignity of the patient. 1. Resident #276 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 1/26/21 at 11:15 a.m., during an observation, Resident #276's urinary drainage catheter bag was observed from hallway with urine noted in the drainage bag. On 1/26/21 at 11:22 a.m., in an interview, Resident #276 said a catheter bag cover would be appropriate for self-regard. 2. Resident #275 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 1/26/21 at 11:40 a.m., during an observation, Resident #275's urinary drainage device was observed from the hallway with urine noted in the drainage bag. On 1/27/21 at 11:45 a.m., in an interview, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-01-28 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interview, the facility failed to have documentation of observation, and monitoring of a dialysis access site for 1 (Resident #8) of 1 dialysis resident. The findings included: On 1/27/21 review of the facility's policy and procedure titled Assessment of arteriovenous shunts, fistulas and grafts updated 7/2017 revealed the frequency of assessment is determined by the patient's condition and medical practitioner order with a minimum frequency of daily. The procedure read Place a hand over the site and palpate for the presence of thrill (motion of blood flowing through the site). Using a stethoscope, auscultate over the site for the presence of bruit (a sound which may range from a wooshing [sic] noise to a whistle-like sound). Fistulas and grafts are access sites placed by minor surgery to reach the blood for hemodialysis. On 1/27/21 at 2:07 p.m., in an interview, Registered Nurse Staff A said Resident #8 had a fistula in her left upper arm. She said the resident had a chest port to be used for dialysis but 4-5 months ago, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-01-28 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct accurate reconciliation between the electronic medication administration record (eMAR) and the Controlled Substance Record for 3 (Residents #11, #28, and #72) of 3 sampled residents reviewed. The findings included: The facility's guidelines for Medication Administration: Master Controlled Substance Log with an original date of 11/2017 read .Document controlled substance administration on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) and on the Controlled Substance Record immediately after administering the medication. 1. During the medication storage observation and review conducted on 1/27/21 at 10:47 a.m., a review of the controlled substances record was conducted for Resident #11. A discrepancy was noted between the eMAR and the control record. Record review revealed the pain medication Tramadol Hydrochloride (HCL) tablet 50 milligram (mg) was ordered to be administered every six (6) hours as needed for Resident #11. The controlled substances record indicated the medication was signed out and removed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-01-28 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure psychoactive medications were monitored and reduced when the behaviors were not exhibited in an attempt to discontinue the medications, and the facility failed to ensure the drug regimen was free from unnecessary medications for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings included: The facility policy Number 52, October 2017 specified, Consultant Pharmacists perform Medication Regime Review (MRR) for patients and will generate recommendations with the overall goal of promoting positive outcomes and minimizing adverse consequences Pharmacist conducts review of the medical record. The findings and or recommendations are entered in the electronic health record assessment Irregularities may include, but are not limited to dosing concerns (including duplicate drug therapy), excessive duration, without adequate monitoring, without adequate indications for use, and/or use in the presence of adverse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2022-08-01 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the required up-to-date nurse staffing information was posted and readily available to residents and visitors. The findings included: On 7/24/22 at 9:10 a.m., observed facility lobby with the nurse staffing information on the wall and out-of-date. The information was dated 7/21/22 and did not include the number of residents currently at the facility (resident census). On 7/24/22 at 9:45 a.m., during an observation of the first-floor nursing station, the nurse staffing information was located in a closed binder behind the desk that was not readily accessible to residents and visitors. The staffing information did not contain the nursing staff directly responsible for resident care. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Staff L confirmed the nurse staffing information was not readily accessible to residents and visitors and did not include accurate information. On 7/29/22 at 1:43 p.m., the Staffing and Scheduling Coordinator Staff T said she was responsible to post the Nurse Staffing information in the facility lobby.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$89,544 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $89,544 — penalty dated 2024-02-01
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to ASTON HEALTH — 38 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 2.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.1 | +0.9 vs chain |
The other 37 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.7★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAPRI REHAB HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 05/05/2023 |
| BP CAPRI TR | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 50% | since 05/05/2023 |
| LF CAPRI TR | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 50% | since 05/05/2023 |
| LEWIS, JENNIFER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 10/16/2023 |
| MARTINEZ IRIZARRY, AXEL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2023 |
| REVILLA, PAOLA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 07/24/2023 |
| TOLLEY, KRISTY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/05/2023 |
| WILDES, DONNA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/28/2025 |
| FRIEDMAN, LEOPOLD | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/16/2025 |
| ASTON HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/05/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $361K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in FL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 105965. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-09-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.