Tierra Pines Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

29.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 82 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 38.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 89 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 57% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 113.6 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.31 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.36 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.06 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.09 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.39 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.45 to 0.14 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-30 · tag F0645 — pattern
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete/update the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Reviews (PASARRs) for residents with a mental disorder and individuals with intellectual disability following qualifying mental health diagnoses for eight (#81, #7, #10, #63, 86,#16, #266 and #43) of 12 residents reviewed for PASARRs. Findings included: 1. Review of the admission record showed Resident #81 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include dementia - 5/8/24, anxiety disorder - 5/8/24, major depressive disorder - 5/8/24 and Epilepsy - 5/8/24. Review of a level I PASARR for Resident #81 dated 5/8/24 revealed a blank PASARR and the qualifying diagnoses were not checked. The review showed the Level I PASARR was incomplete, and a level II was not submitted for consideration following qualifying diagnoses. An interview was conducted on 1/30/25 at 12:34 p.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON), Social Services Director (SSD), and the Social…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper monitoring of sanitation solution for the dish machine in 1 of 1 facility kitchens. Findings Included: During a kitchen tour on 01/27/2025 at 9:50 a.m., Staff F, Dietary Aide, stated the dish machine is a low temp machine. He stated he does not normally record the temps or the sanitizing parameters for the machine. He pointed at the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) and stated he (CDM) fills out the log. Staff F, Dietary Aide, was not sure what the rinse cycle water temp needed to be at. Staff F, Dietary Aide started a wash cycle and checked the sanitation level. The test strip stayed white during the testing, showing there was no sanitation. The sanitation bucket which was located below the dish machine was noted empty. Review of the Dish Machine Temp Log revealed and entry for Breakfast on 01/27/2025. 120 Min Wash had a recording of 125 temperature, 120 Min Rinse and a recording of 123. Sanitaization level was recorded as 50 PPM (Parts Per Minute). During an interview on 01/27/2025 at 9:55 a.m.,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure recommendations from the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level II were incorporated into the care plan for one Resident (#46) out of eight residents sampled. Findings included: Review of Resident # 46's admission Record showed she was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to included but not limited to major depressive disorder, recurrent, moderate, bipolar disorder, current episode manic without psychotic features, severe, other schizophrenia, unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition, generalized anxiety disorder. Review of the Florida Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level II Determination Summary Report showed a level II determination dated 1/21/2020, with the following service recommendations to be added on the patient's Comprehensive Persons Centered Nursing Care plan - Psychiatric Medication Management, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation interview and record review, the facility failed to provide or assist with shaving facial hair for two residents (#72 and #78) of three reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care. Findings Included: 1. During an interview and observation on 1/27/25 at 1:35 P.M. Resident #72 was lying in bed wearing a hospital gown, his facial hair on his neck and the sides of his face were approximately ½ inch in length and appeared unkept. Resident #72 said he would like the hair under his chin and neck to be shaved and staff have not offered to assist him. During an interview and observation on 1/28/25 at 11:15 A.M. Resident # 72 said he does not like the hair on his face and neck, when I get a shower it [facial hair] softens up. Resident #72's unkept facial hair remained unchanged on 1/29 and 1/30. During an interview on 1/30/25 a 2:34 P.M. the Director of Nursing (DON) said staff are expected to offer to shave residents during their shower task. Review of the admission Record showed #Resident #…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation interview and record review, the facility failed to stop bleeding, protect wounds from infection, and promote healing for one resident (#73) of one reviewed for non-pressure related wound care and failed to follow physician orders related to wound care for one resident (#4) out of 6 residents sampled. Findings included: During an interview and observation on 1/27/25 at 10:15 A.M. Resident #73 was lying in bed wearing a hospital gown. Multiple areas with various shades of pink and purple bruising to both arms and hands were observed. On his arms and hands and right cheek there were many lines of crusted brown and black blood, and multiple areas of blood oozing onto his gown and sheet. There was dried blood caked under his nail and around his nailbeds. His linen and gown had numerous areas of moist and crusted blood. Resident # 73 said hi and was unable to provide additional information. Review of the admission record showed Resident #73's initial admission date to the facility was on 9/27/24…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-04-15 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
  Keep all essential equipment working safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain equipment as evidenced by one of two laundry washers not working; two of three laundry dryers not working; one of one unclean gas stove; one of one exhaust hood with peeling paint over stove; and a leaky garbage disposal. Findings included: On 04/15/2024 at 9:55 a.m., an interview was conducted with Staff A, Laundry Aid #1. She stated she had come in early because we (laundry department) were so backed up. One washer and two dryers were not working. They had not been working for almost two weeks. On 04/15/2024 at 10:00 a.m., an interview was conducted with Staff B, Laundry Aid #2. She stated the washer had been down since last Thursday, it had been breaking down on and off, ongoing for the past year. The dryers had been down since Friday, they too, worked on and off. She stated, It is frustrating, we cannot get the laundry done. They will send the family members down to us, and they will scream at us. She said, corporate had known about it. They would blame it on maintenance. She stated, The problem…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-10-31 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and facility record review, the facility failed to ensure resident spaces and equipment were clean and maintained related to: 1. Twelve of thirty-three wheelchairs observed with cracked and torn armrests; 2. Three of seven resident room over the bed tables observed with peeled surfaces, and uneven surfaces; and 3. One resident room, room [ROOM NUMBER] observed with heavy water saturation damage with biogrowth on both the door wall and the ceiling. Observations revealed the above concerns in four of four halls during two of two days observed, on (10/30/2023 and 10/31/2023). Findings included: 1. On 10/30/2023 at 9:45 a.m., 1:00 p.m., and again on 10/31/2023 at 7:55 a.m., and 10:00 a.m. the following resident rooms were observed and revealed: 1. Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] (window bed) was observed with the Left wheelchair armrest cracked and torn. The resident was noted to use the wheelchair. 2. Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] (door bed) was observed with the Left wheelchair…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a sanitary manner as evidence by: 1. the dish washing machine was not receiving sanitizer via the liquid sanitizer delivery system for three wash cycles observed and washing temperatures were not meeting the required temperature; 2. one of one walk in freezers had a large amount of ice buildup; and 3. black bio growth built up on a wall near and behind the dish washing machine, for two days (12/5/2022 and 12/6/2022) of four day observed. Findings included: 1. On 12/5/2022 at 9:20 a.m. the kitchen was toured with the facility's Dietary Manager. Upon entering the kitchen and meeting with the Dietary Manager, he indicated the kitchen utilizes a low temperature dish washing machine, and Staff I, Dietary Aide and Staff J, Dietary Aide were at the time in the process of operating the machine. The Dietary Manager also revealed the dish washing machine's wash temperature cycle was expected to reach at least 120 degrees Fahrenheit (F), and the rinse temperature cycle was to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-12-08 · tag F0847 — pattern
  Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility did not ensure residents who entered arbitration agreements understood the contract contents for three residents (#363, #362 and #361) of three residents sampled. Findings included: 1. On 12/06/22 at 10:04 a.m., an interview was conducted with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA). She presented a list of residents who have recently signed arbitration agreements. The NHA stated they have one resident who is currently in the dispute process, their case has not been resolved. The NHA stated all residents review and sign arbitration agreements upon admission. The NHA stated it was optional. Review of the admission Record for Resident #363 revealed an admission date of 11/21/22 with diagnoses to include failure to thrive, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The Responsible Party/Guarantor listed indicated it was not Resident #363. Review of the admission Agreement attachment titled, Attachment K Alternative Dispute Resolution Agreement Between Resident and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-12-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. On 12/6/22 at 8:41 a.m. an observation was made of Staff L, Registered Nurse (RN) during medication administration. The nurse was preparing medication for Resident #36. She took the resident's blood pressure, then proceeded to remove six pills from the blister pack directly into her ungloved hand. She then placed the pills from her hand into a medication cup and administered them to Resident #36. Staff L then moved on to prepare medication to be administered to Resident #15. Prior to retrieving the resident's medication Staff L took Resident #15's blood pressure. The nurse used the same blood pressure cuff used on the previous resident without sanitizing it in between uses. On 12/6/22 at 9:03 a.m. an interview was conducted with Staff L, RN. She stated the pills should be popped from the blister back straight into a medication cup and she knows she shouldn't handle them. She also confirmed she did not clean the blood pressure cuff in between resident use. She said she had been trained on sanitizing equipment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$4,147 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $4,147 — penalty dated 2025-01-30

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ASTON HEALTH — 38 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 24% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL