Crescent Health And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 444 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 50.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 79 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.61 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 88% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 140 beds and averages 105.6 residents a day — about 75% occupied, or roughly 34 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.47 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.41 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.12 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.13 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.60 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.48 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 64% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · K2024-09-12 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure licensed nurses were knowledgeable, and competent in the disinfection of multi-residents shared glucometers in accordance with manufacturer's specifications. On 9/10/24 through 9/11/24, four licensed nurses on two different shifts and all three units of the facility were observed using multi-residents shared glucometers. The licensed nurses failed to disinfect the glucometers between each resident use. This failure placed 17 (Residents #82, #14, #11, #34, #4, #46, #21, #12, #49, #10, #59, #339, #27, #338, #41, #33, #54) of 17 residents requiring blood glucose testing at risk of exposure to blood-borne disease causing microorganisms which could result in serious illness or death of the residents. The facility failure to ensure licensed nurses maintained competency in disinfection of multi-residents shared glucometers to assure residents' safety resulted in the determination of Immediate Jeopardy starting on 9/10/24. The Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 9/12/24 before exit. The findings included:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · K2024-09-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and staff interviews the facility failed to maintain an on-going infection prevention and control program by failing to ensure multi-residents shared glucometers (blood glucose meters) were properly disinfected between each resident use to prevent cross contamination and spread of infectious agents to 17 (Residents #82, #14, #11, #34, #4, #46, #21, #12, #49, #10, #59, #339, #27, #338, #41, #33, #54) of 17 residents requiring blood glucose testing. On 9/10/24 through 9/11/24 a total of four licensed nurses on different shifts and units were observed using multi-residents shared glucometers. The nurses failed to disinfect the glucometers between each resident use. The facility's failure to ensure proper disinfection of the glucometers in accordance with manufacturer's specifications placed 17 residents requiring blood glucose testing at risk of exposure to blood-borne disease causing microorganisms which could result in serious illness or death of the residents. This failure resulted in the determination of Immediate Jeopardy starting on 9/10/24.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, homelike environment by failing to ensure an adequate amount of clean washcloths and towels to ensure that they available for all residents in the facility throughout the day. The findings included: On 1/15/24 at 10:02 a.m., Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), Staff A said during the 7 a.m. to 3 p.m. shift there was no clean linen, washcloths or towels available on the floor. She said they currently have no washcloths or towels available. On 1/15/24 at 10:20 a.m., the linen closet was observed on the same hall as the staff education room. There were no towels or washcloths available in the closet. On 1/15/25 at 10:30 a.m., Resident #4 said she always had to wait for towels and washcloths, there were never enough available. On 1/15/25 at 10:50 a.m., the Director of Housekeeping said she never did inventories of the amount of towels and washcloths available to staff. She said she was just about to deliver towels and washclothes to the floor. While touring the laundry area the cart the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the Facility failed to ensure a clean and sanitary environment by failing to ensure the carpets in the halls of the facility and several rooms in the facility (rooms 616, and 610) were clean and sanitized, failing to ensure the walls were free form streaks, gouges and pealing wallpaper (rooms 616, 614, 610, and 609) the privacy curtains in room [ROOM NUMBER] and 610 were free from stains, The roof was in good repair and the ceiling in room [ROOM NUMBER] was free from signs of leaking, also, the hand rails were free from worn areas, and the hand rails were free from dirt and debris throughout the facility. The findings included: On 9/11/24 at 10:30 a.m., stains were observed on the carpets throughout the 100, 200, and 300 hallways. On 9/11/24 at 11:20 a.m., stains were observed on the carpet in hallway in front of room [ROOM NUMBER]. On 9/11/24 at 11:22 a.m., a large dark brown stain was observed on the floor room in room [ROOM NUMBER]. On 9/11/23 at 11:25 a.m., a large brown…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to implement physician's ordered interventions to prevent the development of avoidable pressure ulcers for 1 (Resident #34) of 5 sampled residents identified at risk for development of pressure ulcers. The findings included: Review of the clinical record for Resident #34 revealed an admission date of 8/9/24. Diagnoses included left hemiplegia (paralysis of the left side of the body). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with a target date of 8/15/24 noted Resident #34 was dependent on staff for mobility, including rolling left and right. At the time of the assessment, Resident #34 did not have a pressure ulcer but was at risk of developing pressure ulcers. Review of the Braden Scale for predicting Pressure Sore Risk (Standardized, evidence based assessment to predict the risk of developing pressure ulcers) for Resident #34 revealed on 8/31/24 the resident scored 8 on the assessment, indicating a very high risk for development of pressure ulcers. The physician's orders as of 8/21/24 included a low…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff followed safety precautions to prevent avoidable falls and accidents for 1 (Resident #34) of 5 dependent residents observed during transfer with a full body mechanical lift. The findings included: Review of the clinical record for Resident #34 revealed an admission date of 8/9/24. Diagnoses included left Hemiplegia (paralysis of the left side of the body). The admission Minimum Data Set Assessment with a target date of 8/15/24 noted the resident was dependent on staff for chair to bed transfer (Helper does all of the effort. Resident does none of the effort to complete the activity). The care plan initiated on 8/12/24 noted the resident had an activity of daily living self-care deficit related to a history of cerebrovascular accident, left hemiplegia (paralysis of the left side of the body), impaired mobility and weakness. The interventions noted Resident #34 was totally dependent and required the assistance of two for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure its medication error rate was below 5%. Five nurses, seven residents and 25 opportunities were observed. Three medication errors were identified resulting in a medication error rate of 12%. The findings included: 1. On 9/10/24 at 8:37 a.m., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Staff F was observed preparing and administering medications to Resident #36, including 10 different oral medications. Reconciliation of the observation with the physician's orders revealed: MiraLax oral packet 17 grams (laxative), and Fexofenadine 180 milligrams (antihistamine) scheduled to be given at 9:00 a.m., daily were not administered. LPN Staff F placed her initials on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for 9/10/24 indicating the medications were administered in accordance with the physician's orders. On 9/10/24 at 2:20 p.m., in an interview LPN Staff F verified she did not administer the MiraLax or the Fexofenadine to Resident #36 but signed on the MAR she administered both medications as ordered. 2. On 9/10/24…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-02-22 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
  Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure 7 (Residents #2, #1, #3, #5, #12, #8, and #10) of 7 residents interviewed were provided meals at regular times comparable to normal mealtimes in the community. The findings included; On 2/21/24 the Administrator provided a schedule for meal delivery times. The schedule indicated breakfast was delivered to the various wings starting at 7:30 a.m. and last delivery would be 8:20 a.m. in the dining room,. Lunch was delivered to the various wings starting at 11:30 a.m., with the last delivery at 12:20 p.m. Dinner would begin being delivered at 5:30 p.m. with last delivery at 6:20 p.m. On 2/21/24 at 11:48 a.m., a medication cup was on Resident #2's bedside table with a pill in it. Resident #2 explained the medication was Creon (assists with digestion of food) and needed to be taken with his meal. In an interview, Resident #2 said said if they didn't leave it for him, he didn't think he would get it on time. He said there was no set time when the meal will arrive as it differed each day and the nursing staff…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-22 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure sufficient qualified nursing staff to meet residents' needs in a timely manner for 2 (Residents #3, and #4) of 5 residents interviewed. The findings included: On 2/21/24 11:16 a.m., in an interview Resident #3 said the facility could definitely use more help. She said she didn't know what happened or if people call off, but it puts a lot of stress and strain on the Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA). She said the prior evening around 7:00 p.m., she waited around 45 minutes for someone to answer the call light. She finally rolled herself out into the hallway to find help. She said it has become continuously worse since she arrived. Resident #3 said she was incontinent and was trying to train her bladder and bowel. She said she would prefer to use the bathroom more often to assist with that. On 2/21/24 a call light was observed on in hallway at 11:00 a.m. in Resident #4's room. On 2/21/24 at 11:20 a.m., the light was still on and no one had responded to the call light. On 2/21/24 at 11:20 a.m., Resident #4 said someone…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were not left unattended and remained under the direct observation of the person administering the medications for 2 (Residents #2 and #3) of 2 residents with medications observed unsecured at bedside. The findings included: Facility policy titled Administering Oral Medications, revision date October 2010, indicated under bullet #21: Remain with the resident until all medications have been taken. 1. On 2/21/24 at 11:48 a.m., a pill was observed unattended in a medication cup on Resident #2's bedside table. There was no nursing staff in the room with the resident. On 2/21/24 at 12:03 p.m., the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) and Administrator came in room and observed the unsecured medication in the cup at bedside. Resident #2 explained the medication was Creon (assists with digestion of food) and has to be taken with his meal. Resident #2 said said if they didn't leave it for him, he didn't think he would get it on time. He said there was no set time when the meal will arrive as it…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the clinical record was accurately documented for 1 (Residents #2) of 2 residents observed with unsecured and unattended medications at bedside. The findings included: Facility policy titled Administering Oral Medications, revision date October 2010, indicated under bullet #21: Remain with the resident until all medications have been taken. On 2/21/24 at 11:48 a.m., a medication cup was on Resident #2's bedside table with a pill in it. There was no nursing staff in the room with the resident observing the medication. At 12:03 p.m., the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) and Administrator came in room and observed the medication cup at bedside. Resident #2 explained the medication was Creon (assists with digestion of food) and it needed to be taken with his meal. Resident #2 said said if they didn't leave it for him, he didn't think he would get it on time. He said there was no set time when the meal will arrive as it differs each day and the nursing staff leave it for him everyday for all three…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure staff consistently implemented individualized interventions to meet the needs and prevent avoidable accidents for 1 (Resident #41) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for falls. The findings included: Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #41 was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes and hypothyroidism. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with a reference date of 8/22/22 noted the required extensive physical assistance of two persons for bed mobility and transfer. Review of the progress notes revealed on 8/26/22 at 6:15 a.m., the resident rolled out of bed during care and landed in supine position (face down) on the right side of the bed. The investigation report dated 8/26/22 noted the resident rolled onto the side facing away from the aide. The resident attempted to assist and rolled out of bed. The aide was changing the resident by herself. The Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$26,534 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $26,534 — penalty dated 2024-09-12

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ASTON HEALTH — 38 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $466K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL