No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Haines City Rehabilitation And Nursing Center

409 S 10th St, Haines City, FL 33844 · For profit - Corporation · 120 certified beds · (863) 422-8656 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (863) 422-8656 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)$13,380 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (34% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (33) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $13,380 in federal fines (most recent 2024-11-21)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
360 S 10th St · (863) 547-0755 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
17th St · (863) 422-1159 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
14 7th St S · (863) 588-9279 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased9.3%8.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.8%5.5%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.7%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%4.6%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.4%2.5%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened7.8%9.5%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication18.9%14.4%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%99.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.8%4.5%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control28.1%10.5%21.2%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table5.0%8.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.4%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.2%94.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission25.8%26.1%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit8.3%9.1%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.562.131.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.121.151.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

37.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 57 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

37.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
39.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.37U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.20hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.16hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 39.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 63 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 63% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF37.9%CMS range 28.7–51.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.3%CMS range 7.3–15.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge39.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge41.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge34.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.4%CMS range 3.3–12.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.161.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.59
RN hours/ resident / day
0.85
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.10
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.55
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.43
RN hoursweekends
34.4%
Total nursing turnover
52.6%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 107.6 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.55 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.10 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.26 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.66 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.66 to 0.43 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-11-21)
8
at the previous standard inspection (2023-01-12)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

33 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to start a medication timely for one resident (#1) of three residents sampled.Findings included: On 01/13/26 at 9:35 a.m. Resident #1 was observed sleeping with the head of the bed elevated. No odors were noted. A dressing was in place on her left cheek dated 01/12/2026. Her call light was within reach. Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE]. Review of the admission Record showed diagnoses included but not limited to CVA (Cerebrovascular Accident) with hemiplegia, diabetes, stage III chronic kidney disease, hypertension and Alzheimer's disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] showed a blank Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score. Section C-Memory- showed resident is rarely/never understood. Section GG showed the resident required substantial / maximal assistance for toileting and bathing/ and partial / moderate assistance for transferring. Review of a progress note dated 12/12/25 at 11:54 a.m. showed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 5. On 11/18/2024 at 11:01 a.m., Resident #39 was observed laying in bed under the covers, dressed in a gown, groomed and sleeping. The resident was receiving nutrition via tube feeding. A verbal attempt was made to wake the resident up by calling her name, however, the resident opened her eyes and immediately closed her eyes. No visitors or staff were observed in the room. On 11/19/2024 at 10:27 a.m., Resident #39 was observed laying in bed under the covers, dressed in her personal clothing, groomed and awake. An attempt at verbal communication with the resident was made by calling out her name, however, the resident continued to stare and did not verbalize a response. No visitors or staff were observed in the room. On 11/21/2024 at 3:30 p.m., Resident #39 was observed laying in bed under the covers, dressed in her personal clothing, groomed and awake. An attempt at verbal communication with the resident was made by calling out her name, however, the resident continued to stare and did not verbalize a response.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-21 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Program (QAPI) failed to implement an effective plan of action to correct deficient practice identified during the recertification survey and complaint survey originally conducted 11/18/2024 through 11/21/2024 as evidenced by: 1.) failure to provide a safe, clean, and homelike environment for one (B Hall) of two community shower rooms (F584), 2.) failure to ensure blood glucose levels were checked and insulin was administered timely for two residents (#1 and #2) out of three residents reviewed for insulin administration and failed to administer anti-viral medication for one resident (#3) out of one resident reviewed for flu treatment (F684) and 3.) failure to implement an effective Infection Control program as evidenced by staff members not using personal protective equipment (PPE) for two residents (Resident #3 and Resident in room [ROOM NUMBER]) out of 11 on transmission based precautions (TBP) and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-21 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure call light cords and buttons were placed within reach for three (#61, #34, and #24) of forty-eight sampled residents. Findings included: 1. On 11/18/2024 at 2:10 p.m., 11/19/2024 at 8:10 a.m., 3:20 p.m., and on 11/20/2024 at 8:02 a.m. and 9:52 a.m., while Resident #61 was visited in her room, she was observed each time lying in bed flat, under the covers and receiving services to include nourishment via a tube feed system, pressure ulcer care via a wound vacuum system, and also was observed utilizing an indwelling urinary catheter. Further observations revealed each visit included the call light button and cord was either placed hanging off the back of the head of the mattress and between the wall out from her reach or lying on the floor out from her reach. An initial interview attempt was made with Resident #61 on 11/18/2024 at 2:10 p.m., she was noted with cognitive deficits. Resident #61 was able to speak related to her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-21 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure one (#36) of forty-eight sampled residents was offered and assisted to scheduled activities that met his interest. Findings included: On 11/18/2024 at 9:55 a.m., 10:30 a.m., 1:00 p.m., 2:00 p.m.; on 11/19/2024 at 7:30 a.m., 8:20 a.m., 1:00 p.m., 3:00 p.m.; on 11/20/2024 at 8:07 a.m., 10:00 a.m., 11:30 a.m., 12:21 p.m., 1:45 p.m., 2:00 p.m., 3:00 p.m.; and on 11/21/2024 at 8:00 a.m., 10:00 a.m., and 11:45 a.m., Resident #36 was observed in his room, lying flat in his bed with the covers and blanket over him, pulled over, and above his head. When attempting to meet with Resident #36 on 11/18/2024, he did not respond to an interview. During all the dates and times listed above, Resident #36 was observed not up for the day and not dressed. He was also not observed offered or assisted by either his assigned Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) or activities staff with the daily scheduled activities. Review of the large…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not ensure medications were administered in a timely manner for two (#815, #763) of forty eight residents and failed to ensure wounds were monitored for signs and symptoms of infections and deterioration, and treatment orders were obtained and implemented for one (#64) of two residents sampled for pressure wounds, surgical incisions, and other skin conditions. Findings Included: 1.Review of the admission Record for Resident #815 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Chronic Diastolic Heart Failure, Non-St Elevation Myocardial Infarction, Paroxysmal Afibrillation and Pulmonary Hypertension. Review of November 2024 Physician orders for Resident #815 revealed an order dated 11/4/24 for : Enoxaparin Sodium Injection Solution Prefilled Syringe 80 Mg/0.8 ML.(Enoxaparin Sodium) Inject 0.7 ml subcutaneously two times a day for Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis for 60 days. Review of the November Medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-21 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered at the correct dose for one (Resident #90) out of 26 residents sampled. Findings Included: During an observation on 11/18/2024 at 9:49 a.m. Resident #90 was observed in bed, she was not able to answer questions regarding her care. Review of Resident #90's admission record revealed resident #90 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included anxiety disorder and depression. Review of Resident 90's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Section C. Cognitive Patterns, Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 04 out of 15 showing severe cognitive impairment. Review of Section N. Medications revealed Antipsychotic and antidepressant. Review of Resident #90's orders revealed on 11/07/2024 an order for Seroquel Oral Tablet 25 milligrams (MG) (Quetiapine Fumarate) Give 3 tablet by mouth in the evening for agitation and an order for Seroquel Oral Tablet 25 MG Give 25 MG by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-21 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5.00%. Thirty-four medication administration opportunities were observed, and three errors were identified for two (#13 and #11) of four residents observed. These errors constituted an 8.82% medication error rate. Findings included: 1. On 11/19/24 at 8:43 a.m., an observation of medication administration with Staff P, Registered Nurse (RN) was conducted with Resident #13. The staff member dispensed the following medications: - Gabapentin 800 milligram (mg) tablet - Zoloft 100 mg tablet - Megestrol AC Suspension 40 mg/milliliter (mL) - 10 mL - Artificial Tears lubricant eye drops (contained glycerin, hypromellose, and poly glycol) -Buspirone (Buspar) 5 mg tablet Staff P confirmed dispensing 3 oral tablets prior to entering Resident #13's room. The resident refused the liquid Megace reporting refusing all along. The staff member obtained a blood pressure of 98/64, administered oral medications, then placed one drop of Artificial Tears in each eye. The staff member…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-21 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to coordinate dental services for one resident (#18) out of eight residents sampled. Findings include: During an observation on 11/18/24 at 2:05 p.m., Resident #18 was observed sitting up on her bed, fully dressed with no signs of distress. She stated her only concerns were that she had missing teeth, and she really wanted to have a set of dentures so she could chew her food. She stated she did not know what happened to her dentures. During an observation on 11/20/2024 at 11:45 am., Resident #18 was observed sitting up in her wheelchair eating her lunch. She said she was not able to eat her green beans because she did not have any teeth. She stated the facility had not assisted her with dental services. On 11/20/2024 at 2:20 p.m., an interview was conducted with Staff M, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA). Staff M stated every morning she provided oral care to all her residents. For residents who wore dentures she provided them with denture…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-21 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident meal observation and staff interview, it was determined the facility did not ensure one (Resident #816) of three residents observed during a lunch meal received food presented in an attractive and appealing manner. Findings included: Review of the record for Resident # 816 revealed diagnoses which included Unspecified Alzheimer's disease, Unspecified Dementia, Unspecified Protein-Calorie Malnutrition and Dysphagia Oropharyngeal Phase. Review of the record for Resident # 816 indicated a diet order for Pureed Texture Thin Consistency (Photographic Evidence obtained). An observation of the lunch meal for Resident # 816 was conducted on 11/18/24 at 12:11 p.m. Resident # 816 was observed in her bed and the lunch meal was placed on the overbed table by a CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) who was observed to remove the lid on the entree and then exit the room. A dinner size plate was located on the tray and was observed to be filled with a soupy consistency of pureed foods running together on the plate (photographic evidence obtained). An interview was conducted with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 23 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to implement an effective infection control program related to 1. the use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for one (#88) of one sampled resident for transmission-based precautions, 2. failed to ensure fingernails of staff were kept in a manner that prohibited the growth of microorganisms and allowed for sufficient hand hygiene, and 3. failed to ensure the storage of personal hygiene equipment for one resident (#91) out of ten sampled residents related to oral hygiene. Findings included: 1. On 11/18/24 at 9:14 a.m. an observation was made of a Contact precaution sign posted outside of Resident #88's room. The sign showed STOP - CONTACT PRECAUTIONS EVERYONE MUST: Clean their hands, including before entering and when leaving the room. PROVIDERS AND STAFF MUST ALSO: Put on gloves before room entry. Discard gloves before room exit. Put on gown before room entry. Discard gown before room exit. Do not wear the same gown and gloves for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a clean and comfortable environment by not maintaining and cleaning one (B Hall) of two community shower rooms. Findings included: On 11/18/2024 at 9:40 a.m., an observation was made of the B Hall community shower room. Upon entering the shower room, it was observed to be cluttered and disorganized. Located on the left-hand side just after entry was a restroom with a toilet and sink. Next to the room with the toilet, there was a shower with a curtain. On the other side of the room there were two sinks. The clutter of the room made it hard to get to the other two sinks. The clutter observed included a privacy curtain, various wheelchair parts, Hoyer lift, bedside commode and a walker. (Photographic evidence obtained). The observation of the shower room also included: 1. The foam mat laying on the top of the shower bed had a dried brown substance on the top. 2. On the shower bed underneath the foam mat and on the mesh part of the bed, there were dried brown and black objects as well as hair. 3. In a corner of the room…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (#61) of forty-eight sampled residents, was provided with personal hygiene fingernail care during at least three of four days observed (11/18/2024, 11/19/2024, 11/20/2024). It was observed all ten of the fingernails were found with dark debris and were long, cracked/chipped and leaving sharp edges. Findings included: On 11/18/2024 at 2:10 p.m., Resident #61 was visited while in her room. She was observed residing in a private room and was noted in her bed lying flat with the Head of Bed (HOB) approximately 30 degrees. Resident #61 was further observed with her hands placed on her lap, over the bed linen. All ten fingernails were observed elongated approximately ½ inch to ¾ inches, cracked and chipped with sharp edges. Further, the under nails were observed with build up of dark debris/matter. An interview with Resident #61 revealed she had impaired cognition, but was able to speak with regards to her daily routines and she was able to speak related to her personal hygiene and nail care. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a hazarded free room environment, with (brand name) Air Freshener Spray found in one resident room, Resident (#99) out of eight residents sampled. Findings include: During an observation on 11/18/2024 at 10:00 a.m., and 12:41p.m., Resident #99's room was observed with the door open, where other residents were able to enter the room. Her dresser was observed with two air freshener sprays. The bathroom was observed with one additional air freshener spray on the bathroom rail over the toilet. During an interview on 11/19/2024 at 10:00 a.m., with Resident #99. She stated the staff took away her air fresheners today. She stated she has had her sprays on her dresser for about a month but was told by staff today they had to take it away because she is not allowed to have air freshener sprays in her room. Review of an admission Record dated 11/21/2024 showed Resident #99 was admitted to the facility originally on 6/4/2024 and readmitted on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services to maintain a sanitary and homelike environment related to not maintaining the kitchen ceiling in one of one kitchen, repairing of holes in the walls of three resident rooms (#140, #145 and #181), and a stained floor, walls and privacy curtain and broken furniture in one resident room (room [ROOM NUMBER]) out of a total of 64 resident rooms. Findings included: 1. On 01/09/23 at 10:02 a.m., an initial tour of the kitchen was conducted. Three ceiling tiles were observed cracked and chipped in the area near the dish washing machine. In addition, multiple ceiling tiles above the food prep area were observed with an excessive amount of black buildup (Photographic Evidence Obtained). On 01/10/23 at 9:30 a.m., the Nursing Home Administrator reported they have had a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) in place for building repairs since August 2022 and the kitchen ceiling was on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-12 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility, 1. failed to ensure blood pressures were monitored adequately for a period of three months for one resident (#40) of five sampled residents, and 2. failed to ensure one resident (#98) receiving antibiotic treatment had a diagnosis listed, to indicate the purpose of the treatment of four residents reviewed for a UTI (urinary tract infection) diagnosis. Findings included: 1. A review of the admission Record revealed Resident #40 was initially admitted into the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included but was not limited to hypertension. A review of the Order Summary Report with active orders as of 11/01/22 indicated the following order: Hydralazine HCL Tablet 25 MG (milligram)- Give 25 mg by mouth four times a day for hypertension, start date 9/25/22. Hold if systolic blood pressure is less than 110 or diastolic blood pressure is less than 60. A review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for November 2022, December 2022, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-12 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive assessments were accurately documented for one resident (#84) of 50 sampled residents. Findings included: A review of Resident #84's admission Record revealed Resident #84 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of cerebral infarction and mixed receptive-expressive language disorder. A review of the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) Resident Matrix revealed physical restraints were used for Resident #84. A review of Resident #84's active physician's orders as of 1/12/2023, revealed an order, dated 8/25/2022 for an electronic monitoring device to the left ankle. A review of Resident #84's physician's orders did not reveal an order for use of physical restraints. A review of Resident #84's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 10/6/2022, revealed under Section P: Physical Restraints, a physical restraint, categorized as other was used while in bed on a less than daily basis for Resident #84. The assessment also…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop a care plan related to floor mats for one resident (#15) of fifty sampled residents. Findings included: A review of the admission Record revealed Resident #15 was initially admitted into the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to dementia, major depressive disorder, and unspecified abnormalities of gait and mobility. Review of Section C Cognitive Patterns of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated the resident was rarely or never understood. On 01/09/23 at 10:50 a.m., Resident #15 was observed sitting on the side of the bed attempting to get out of the bed. The bed frame was observed resting on the floor. A mattress was observed on the floor to the right of the bed and two stacked floor mats were observed on the left side of the bed (Photographic Evidence Obtained). On 01/11/23 at 4:47 p.m., the resident was observed in bed sleeping with the mattress on the right side of the bed on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) related to oral care, were provided for one resident (#91) of five residents sampled. Findings included: During facility tours conducted on 01/09/23 at 12:35 p.m., and 01/10/23 at 12:52 p.m., Resident #91 was observed in her room, laying on her bed. Resident #91's tongue was noted with a white substance all over the surface of her tongue and around her lips. Resident #91's lips were noted dry and chapped on the surface. The resident stated she remains in bed all the time and was dependent on staff for care. On 01/11/23 at 1:43 p.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #91. The resident stated she does not receive oral care every day. Resident #91 said, Some staff will just have me rinse my mouth with water and they do not use a toothbrush or toothpaste. Some of them use a sponge and wipe around the inside of my mouth. Resident #91 stated she did not know if she owned a toothbrush and stated she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to provide supervision for smoking and limited access to smoking materials for three residents (#58, #712, and #715) out of ten smokers as evidence by the observation of the three residents smoking unsupervised and the observation of smoking paraphernalia removed from resident rooms. Findings included: 1. An observation was conducted on 1/10/23 at 9:30 a.m., of Resident #58 with Staff H, Registered Nurse (RN). The resident was sitting in the courtyard against the exterior wall of the facility's D-wing. The resident was holding a lit cigarette which had approximately 1 left. An ashtray was not available to the resident in the immediate area. Staff H was the only staff member in the courtyard at the time of the observation and had arrived and then left the courtyard. Staff H did not address the unsupervised smoking with Resident #58. On 1/10/23 at 2:00 p.m. an observation was conducted in the courtyard of three residents (#58, #712, and #715)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-12 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide enteral nutrition in accordance with professional standards for one resident (#459) of two residents sampled for enteral nutrition needs. Findings included: A review of Resident #459's admission Record revealed Resident #459 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). A review of Resident #459's active physician's orders revealed an enteral feed order, dated 1/6/2023, for Glucerna 1.5 at 50 milliliters per hour (ml/hr) with water flush at 30 ml/hr for 20 hours, up at 2:00 PM - down at 10 AM. An observation was conducted on 1/10/2023 at 9:35 a.m. of Resident #459 in the resident's room. Resident #459 was observed resting in bed with the head of the bed elevated and enteral feeding running. An observation of Resident #459's enteral feeding pump revealed Glucerna 1.5 was being administered to Resident #459 at a rate of 55 ml/hr with water flush at 40 ml/hr. The same rate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-12 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure the physician order for one resident (#17) out of five residents sampled for unnecessary medications was implemented following the recommendation of the consulting pharmacist. Findings included: The admission Record for Resident #17 indicated an admission date of 1/21/21 and included diagnoses not limited to unspecified sequelae of cerebral infarction, ischemic cardiomyopathy, and moderate recurrent major depressive disorder. An observation of Resident #17 lying in bed was conducted, on 1/9/23 at 12:23 p.m. The Medication Regimen Review (MRR) conducted on 10/29/22, identified a recommendation from the Consultant Pharmacist asking the physician to consider a gradual dose reduction, Alprazolam 0.5 milligram (mg) orally (po) every day (qd) for anxiety (anx). The Physician/Prescriber Response section indicated the physician agreed with the recommendation, was signed, and dated on 11/3/22 or 11/7/22 (date showed as a 3 or 7 written over the other number). The physician's progress note, dated 10/27/22 (2 days…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-04-30 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was less than 5.00%. Thirty- eight medication administration opportunities were observed, and twenty-three errors were identified for four (#43, #11, #27 and #3) of six residents observed. These errors constituted a 60.53% error rate. Findings included: 1. On 4/28/21 at 11:32 a.m., an observation of medication administration with Staff F, Registered Nurse (RN), was conducted with Resident #43. The electronic medication profile for Resident #43 was observed to be red-colored, which the staff member stated was due to the medications were late. Staff F was observed dispensing the following medications: - Acetaminophen[[NAME] 325 milligram (mg) - 2 tablets - Vitamin C 500 mg tablet - Clopidogrel 75 mg tablet - Docusate Sodium 100 mg softgel - Fish Oil 1000 mg softgel The staff member searched the medication cart for the Calcium - D3 tablet that was also due at 9:00 a.m. but was unable to locate so he…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-04-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one of one kitchen was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner, one (Station #2) of two refrigerators in the pantry stations was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner, and temperatures were documented daily for the refrigerators and freezers in two pantry stations (Station #1 and Station #2) of two pantry stations. Findings included: On 04/27/21 starting at 9:50 a.m., an initial tour of the kitchen was conducted with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM). The white flap inside of the ice machine was observed with black buildup. The inside of the drink nozzle was observed with white buildup. An excessive amount of black buildup was observed above the food preparation area. An excessive amount of dust was observed on two ceiling vents above the food serving area (Photographic Evidence Obtained). The CDM stated that she spoke to maintenance on Friday (4/23/21), and he stated that he had to order replacement tiles for the ceiling. She then stated she spoke with maintenance about the whole ceiling…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-04-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to honor the rights to a dignified existence by not ensuring that a resident's environment enhanced the quality of life for one resident (#77) of 43 sampled residents. Findings included: Observations of Resident #77's private room on 4/27/21 at 10:49 a.m. revealed that the resident's room was [NAME], with the closet empty and no dresser in the room. During the observation it was noted that there was a large box sitting on an armchair with personal items in it. While interviewing Resident #77, at this time, the resident reported that she had COVID-19 two weeks ago and that the facility moved her to her current room. She reported that all her belongings are in the cardboard box and that nothing was unpacked. An observation of Resident #77's private room on 4/28/21 at 12:25 p.m. revealed that her belongings were still in a cardboard box, and the room was still [NAME]. An interview with the resident confirmed that her belongings are still in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-04-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to implement the care plan for two residents (#49 and #94) out of forty-three residents sampled in regards to ensuring the resident (#49) was not isolated in her room and ensuring the resident (#94) had bilateral floor mats as ordered. Findings included: 1. A review of the admission Record for Resident #49 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and 9/25/14. The admission Record included diagnoses not limited to unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, unspecified hand contracture, and aphasia following unspecified cerebrovascular disease. A review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated the resident did not have a Brief Interview of Mental Status score, indicative of severe cognitive impairment. The MDS identified that Resident #49 exhibited physical behavioral symptoms directed toward others, (e.g., hitting, kicking, pushing, scratching, grabbing, abusing others sexually) 1 to 3…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-04-30 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to provide restorative services per physician's orders for two residents (#30 and #49) out of the sampled forty-three residents. Findings included: 1. On 04/27/21 at 12:00 p.m., Resident #30 stated that he wanted to get out of bed to keep his legs strong. He stated that he only had therapy for 30 days and was not doing restorative. Resident #30 stated restorative staff are always doing other duties on the floor. He stated this was not fair to him because he was not ready to give up. On 04/28/21 at 11:03 a.m., Resident #30 reported that he had only seen restorative twice since he had been admitted into the facility. He stated that he wanted to stand to help keep his legs strong. Resident #30 stated he had probably been out of bed four times in the last three weeks, and he use to get up every day. He reported he had a stroke on the left side and does not want to get weaker. A review of the admission Record for Resident #30 revealed that he…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-04-30 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to ensure weekly weights were obtained following weight loss for two residents (#94 and #27) out of four residents sampled for nutrition. Findings included: 1. Review of the admission Record revealed that Resident #94 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Record included diagnoses not limited to gastrostomy status, other seizures, and unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified that the resident had a nasogastric or abdominal feeding tube (percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG)) and received more than 51% of her total calories through a tube feeding. The Malnutrition, At Risk of Malnutrition, Morbid Obesity Screening Assessment, effective 3/31/21, indicated that Resident #94 was at risk for malnutrition. The Malnutrition Assessment identified that the most recent weight was 122.4 pounds (#) as of 3/30/21 and a Body Mass Index (BMI) of 20. The initial…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-04-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, policy reviews, and interviews the facility failed to ensure respiratory equipment for two residents (#40 and #94) out of thirty residents who received respiratory treatments was stored in a sanitary manner for three of four days. Findings included: During an interview on 4/27/21 at 12:07 p.m., Resident #40 was observed lying in bed with a Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) machine sitting on her bedside dresser. On top of the machine was a CPAP uncovered mask. The resident confirmed using the machine nightly. (Photographic Evidence Obtained) On 4/28/21 at 10:20 a.m., Resident #40 was observed sitting in a wheelchair in front of her bedside dresser. On top of the dresser was a CPAP machine with its mask and tubing sitting on top of it. The mask was not in a labeled bag. On 4/29/21 at 10:25 a.m., an observation indicated the Resident #40's CPAP mask was lying uncovered on top of the machine. A review of the admission Record revealed that Resident #40 was admitted to the facility on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-04-30 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to monitor side effects of psychotropic medications for two residents (#30 and #25) and failed to monitor behaviors for one resident (#25) out of the sampled five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings included: 1. A review of the admission Record for Resident #30 revealed that he was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of unspecified sequelae of cerebral infarction. A review of Section C Cognitive Patterns of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed that Resident #30 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 indicating he was cognitively intact. Section N Medications revealed that the resident received antipsychotics five days a week and antidepressants four days a week. The resident had the following active physician orders: Desvenlafaxine Extended-Release Tablet 24 hour 50 mg (milligram)- Give 1 tablet po (by mouth) one time a day for depression,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-04-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to ensure that drugs and biologicals were stored in a safe, secure, and orderly manner related to not ensuring medications were inaccessible to residents, unauthorized personnel and/or visitors during two of six observations of medication administration and failed to permanently affix two of two refrigerated narcotic boxes. Findings included: During the task of medication administration on 4/28/21 at 11:32 a.m., after dispensing medications for Resident #43, Staff F, Registered Nurse (RN), walked away from the medication cart to the nursing station, leaving a bottle of Fish Oil, Docusate Sodium, Tylenol (Acetaminophen), Vitamin C, and the blister card of Clopidogrel on top of the cart while it was unattended. On 4/28/21 at 11:49 a.m., Staff F retrieved Resident #11 from near the nursing station and assisted the resident into his room then administered medication to the resident. Staff F left the bottle of Multi-Vitamin with mineral tablets on the medication cart during the administration. After the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-04-30 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — isolated
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility did not ensure sufficient staff were available to provide meal assistance for five residents (#20, #52, #54, #55, and #66) during dining services, of 102 residents in the facility, on one of four hallways (the B Hall) for two of two days observed. Findings included: Resident #66 was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis of dementia, according to the face sheet in the admission record. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] reflected Resident #66 was rarely/never understood, and the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) could not be conducted, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Section G, Functional Status was reviewed and reflected that Resident #66 required extensive assistance of one staff member for eating. Resident #20 was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease, according to the face sheet in the admission record. Review of the MDS assessment dated 4/18//21, reflected Resident #20 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-04-30 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, record review, observations, menu review, and policy review the facility did not ensure cultural food choices were available for one resident (#61) of 43 residents sampled. Findings included: Resident #61 was admitted with a diagnosis of sepsis according to the face sheet in the admission record. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/1/21, reflected a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating that Resident #61 was cognitively intact. On 4/27/21 at 12:27 p.m. an interview was conducted with Resident #61. She said the food is always the same. It's green beans or corn every day, and mashed potatoes or pasta. She prefers Latin American food. No one has ever asked her about her preferences. Resident #61 reported that the alternate is a sandwich. A review of the Resident Profile, Company Name, Dietary Management System, dated 12/22/20 reflected no likes or dislikes were indicated for any of the meals. An observation was conducted on 4/27/21 at 12:37 p.m. during the lunch meal. Resident #61's lunch plate had mixed vegetables,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$13,380 in federal fines across 3 penalties.

  • $4,017 — penalty dated 2024-11-21
  • $4,017 — penalty dated 2024-11-21
  • $5,346 — penalty dated 2024-11-21

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ASTON HEALTH — 38 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.7-0.7 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.2+0.8 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 54.1-1.1 vs chain
The other 37 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.7★, per CMS)
1 of 5Crescent Health And Rehabilitation CenterSarasota, FL 1 of 5Kensington Gardens Rehab And Nursing CenterClearwater, FL 1 of 5Nursing & Rehabilitation Center Of New Port RicheyNew Port Richey, FL 1 of 5Oak Haven Rehab And Nursing CenterAuburndale, FL 1 of 5Vero Beach Care CenterVero Beach, FL 2 of 5Baya Pointe Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterLake City, FL 2 of 5Capri Health And Rehabilitation CenterVenice, FL 2 of 5Creekside Health And Rehabilitation CenterSarasota, FL 2 of 5Fairway Oaks CenterTampa, FL 2 of 5Flagler Health And Rehabilitation CenterBunnell, FL 2 of 5Highlands Lake CenterLakeland, FL 2 of 5Indian River CenterWest Melbourne, FL 2 of 5North Port Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterNorth Port, FL 2 of 5Pensacola Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterPensacola, FL 2 of 5Riverwood CenterJacksonville, FL 2 of 5Sandgate Gardens Rehab And Nursing CenterFort Pierce, FL 2 of 5Sea Breeze Rehab And Nursing CenterVero Beach, FL 2 of 5Tierra Pines CenterLargo, FL 2 of 5Viera Del Mar Health And Rehabilitation CenterViera, FL 2 of 5Winter Garden Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterWinter Garden, FL 3 of 5Cedarbrook Health And Rehabilitation CenterFort Myers, FL 3 of 5Coquina CenterOrmond Beach, FL 3 of 5Eagleridge Health And Rehabilitation CenterFort Myers, FL 3 of 5Fouraker Hills Rehab And Nursing CenterJacksonville, FL 3 of 5Hillside Health And Rehabilitation CenterZephyrhills, FL 3 of 5Oakpark Health And Rehabilitation CenterPalm Harbor, FL 4 of 5Bridgeview CenterOrmond Beach, FL 4 of 5Coastal Health And Rehabilitation CenterDaytona Beach, FL 4 of 5Debary Health And Rehabilitation CenterDebary, FL 4 of 5Fernandina Beach Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterFernandina Beach, FL 4 of 5Island Lake CenterLongwood, FL 4 of 5Meadowpark Health And Rehabilitation CenterDunedin, FL 4 of 5Parkside Health And Rehabilitation CenterDeland, FL 4 of 5Ruleme CenterEustis, FL 4 of 5Seaside Health And Rehabilitation CenterDaytona Beach, FL 5 of 5Bayview CenterEustis, FL 5 of 5Osprey Point Nursing CenterBushnell, FL

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
HC REHAB HOLDINGS, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 12/03/2018
QUALITY REHAB PARTNERS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 06/20/2019
KING, CAZZIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/12/2022
MANUBENS, CLAUDIOIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/02/2025
PEMBERTON, CANDISIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/06/2022
PIERRE-GRAVES, WILENEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 11/16/2022
WILDES, DONNAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/28/2025
ASTON HEALTHCARE LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2022

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$12.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-3.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.0M
Related-party expense15% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 57%Medicare 11%Other / private 32%

This home reported $2.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$321per resident / day
operating cost
$9,747per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$309per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Florida
$10,342/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,610/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 105442. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-11-21, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next