Ruleme Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

43.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 57 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 39.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 68 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 55% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 138 beds and averages 117.5 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 20 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.56 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.47 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.12 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.24 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.69 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.50 to 0.40 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 64% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-12-06 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy and procedure review the facility failed to ensure the residents rights were honored by failing to provide an opportunity to formulate advance directives. Resident #1's advance directive for Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) was not honored by the facility when they failed to obtain clarification of code status during the admission process, per facility policy. This failure resulted in the resident experiencing serious psychosocial harm by not honoring the resident's wishes for a natural, dignified death. Successful Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) may result in major physical trauma including broken ribs, lung bruising, damage to the airway and internal organs, and internal bleeding. Along with the physical trauma, residents who receive CPR may have to deal with serious long-term consequences like possible brain damage from oxygen deprivation. Findings include: Review of Resident #1's admission Record documented an admission date of [DATE] with the following diagnoses:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-23 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents' treatment choice for 1 of 4 residents reviewed, Resident #28.Findings include:Review of Resident #28's physician order dated 6/18/2024 read, [name of palliative care provider]: Resident/resident representative request no further weights to be obtained.Review of Resident #28's weight records revealed the resident's weights were obtained on 7/2/2024 (141.7 pounds), 8/2/2024 (139.5 pounds), 12/4/2024 (128.0 pounds), 10/2/2025 (132.3 pounds), 11/4/2025 (140.5 pounds), 12/4/2025 (139.4 pounds), and 1/7/2026 (133.2 pounds).During an interview on 1/22/2026 at 8:29 AM, Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse, confirmed Resident #28's representative had requested no more weight to be obtained. Staff A was uncertain why Resident #28's weights had continued to be obtained after Resident #28's representative's request and a physician order not to obtain the weights.During an interview on 1/22/2026 at 10:02 AM, the Director of Nursing confirmed Resident #28 had a physician order for obtaining no more weight.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a clean and homelike environment in 1 of 2 halls, Hallway 200.Findings include:During an observation of Resident #88's room on 1/20/2026 at 10:22 AM, the bathroom had a brown ring around the toilet, and there was a brown discoloring of a tile located in front of the toilet.During an observation of Resident #83's room on 1/20/2026 at 10:41 AM, the baseboards had a brown and black substance located on top of the baseboards around the entire room. There was black substance underneath and on top of the air conditioner. There was a white cloth with brown substance on the cloth with yellow, black and brown substances and peeling paint all around the top of the air conditioner, with dust like material and cobwebs protruding out of the air conditioner vents.During an interview on 1/20/2026 at 10:41 AM, Resident #83 stated, I never see the housekeeping or maintenance department in the room cleaning under, over, or inside the AC [Air Conditioner] and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-23 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to coordinate assessments for the residents with newly evident or possible serious mental disorder and failed to ensure an accurate Level I Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) screen was completed for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for PASRR, Residents #9.Findings include: Review of Resident #9's admission record documented the resident was initially admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included psychophysiologic insomnia (onset date of 10/23/2025), major depressive disorder (onset date of 3/10/2025), post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (onset date of 3/10/2025), nightmare disorder (onset date of 3/10/2025), and generalized anxiety disorder (onset date of 2/15/2025). Review of Resident #9's psychiatry note dated 11/13/2025 read, History of present illness: [Resident #9's name] is a [AGE] year old male with a psychiatric history of insomnia, depression, anxiety, and PTSD. Review of Resident #9's medical records showed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-23 · tag F0694 — isolated
  Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received intravenous (IV) therapy consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for medication administration, Resident #39.Findings include:During an observation on 1/21/2026 at 2:15 PM, Resident #39 was lying in bed, dressed in a hospital gown. The resident had a PICC (Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter) line on her right upper arm. The PICC line dressing was dated 1/19/2026 and there was a gauze pad under the dressing.Review of Resident #39's physician order dated 12/14/2025 read, PICC Line Right Arm: Change dressing within 24 hours of admission, insertion, or reinsertion and Q7 (every 7) days and PRN [as needed] thereafter using sterile technique. Measure arm circumference and external length of catheter.During an interview on 1/21/2026 at 4:45 PM, Staff C, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Unit Manager, stated that if she were to do a central line dressing change, she would not use gauze, but gauze pads came in the central line dressing kits, and that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene during medication administration and used appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) while providing high contact care to the residents on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for 2 of 6 residents reviewed for medication administration, Residents #39 and #51, and failed to ensure respiratory care equipment were stored in a hygienic manner for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for respiratory services, Residents #73 and #98, to prevent the possible spread of infection and communicable diseases. Findings include: 1) During an observation on 1/20/2026 at 10:47 AM, Resident #73's nebulizer mask and tubing was lying on the floor. During an interview on 1/20/2026 at 10:47 AM, Resident #73 stated, I completed the breathing treatment about an hour ago. I take breathing treatments at least 3 times a day. During an observation on 1/20/2026 at 1:57 PM, Resident #73's nebulizer mask and tubing was lying on the floor. Review of Resident #73's physician order dated 4/11/2025 read,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff used proper personal protective equipment (PPE) while providing high contact care to the residents on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP).to prevent the possible spread of infection and communicable diseases. Findings include: During an observation on 1/30/2025 at 10:00 AM, Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), was administering medications into Resident #4's gastric tube. Staff A had gloves. Staff A did not have a gown. There was an Enhanced Barrier Precautions signage on the door. There were personal protective equipment in the hallway, containing gowns and masks. During an interview on 1/30/2025 at 10:15 AM, Staff A, LPN, stated, I wore gloves. I sometimes wear gowns. During an interview on 1/30/2025 at 2:10 PM, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) stated, They have to have all the PPE, the gloves, the gown, the mask, and any additional items that they might require. Review of the facility policy and procedure titled Standards and Guidelines: Enhanced Barrier Precautions issued in March…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to ensure residents were administered oxygen as per physician order for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory care (Resident #13). Findings include: Review of Resident #13's admission record showed the resident was most recently admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included anemia, unspecified, dysphagia following cerebral infarction (a stroke), aphasia (inability to speak) following cerebral infarction, quadriplegia, unspecified, type 2 diabetes mellitus with other circulatory complications, unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition, status gastrostomy, occlusion and stenosis of right vertebral artery, essential (primary) hypertension, and dependence on supplemental oxygen. Review of Resident #13's physician order dated 5/21/2024 showed it read, Respiratory-Oxygen: NC [nasal cannula]/mask continuous. Encourage and assist resident to us O2 [oxygen] @ [at] 2 LPM [liters per minute] via nasal cannula continuously for every shift for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were securely stored in 1 of 2 residential halls, Hall 100. Findings include: During an observation on 8/19/2024 at 9:49 AM, Resident #9 was in her room lying in bed. There was a plastic cup lid turned up on the bedside table containing five different pills. On 8/19/2024 at 9:49 AM, an interview was attempted with Resident #9 related to the medications observed on the bedside table. Resident #9 stated, You want them? During an interview on 8/19/2024 at 9:52 AM, Staff A, Registered Nurse (RN) confirmed the medications at bedside and verified the plastic cup lid on the bedside table did contain five pills. During an interview on 8/19/2024 at 9:55 AM, Staff A, RN, stated that she passed the medications to Resident #9 at 9:00 AM, and identified the medications as Resident #9's Trazodone, Iron Pill, Clopidogrel, blood pressure medication, and Isosorbide pill. Staff A stated she did not leave the medications at bedside and pointed out that the medications were moist where evidently [Resident #9's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
  Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility administration failed to assume full responsibility for the day-to-day operations of the facility by allowing unlicensed staff to work outside the accepted professional standards and current federal, state, and local regulations to ensure the highest degree of quality care was maintained. The facility administration failed to verify the licensure status of a nurse prior to employment who was found to not have a valid Florida license as a registered nurse. Findings include: Review of personnel records showed Staff A, Registered Nurse, was hired by the facility as a qualified Registered Nurse on 6/11/2024 and was scheduled to work in the facility as a Registered Nurse. Review of the Florida Department of Health licensure web site (https://mqa-internet.doh.state.fl.us/MQASearchServices/HealthCareProviders) revealed Staff A, RN, was not licensed as a Registered Nurse in the State of Florida. During an observation on 8/19/2024 at 9:00 AM, Staff A, RN, was working at a medication cart in the facility. Staff A had a name tag…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medical records were accurate and complete for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for wound care, Resident #13. Findings include: Review of Resident #13's admission record showed the resident was most recently admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included necrotizing fasciitis, stage 4 pressure ulcer of sacral region, anemia, dysphagia following cerebral infarction (a stroke), aphasia (inability to speak) following cerebral infarction, quadriplegia, type 2 diabetes mellitus with other circulatory complications, occlusion and stenosis of right vertebral artery, essential (primary) hypertension, and dependence on supplemental oxygen. Review of Resident #13's physician order dated 4/26/2024 read, Cleanse wound to sacrum with normal saline, pat dry, apply calcium alginate to wound bed, cover with silicone border foam every day shift for sacral wound. Review of Resident #13's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for April 2024 showed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$24,889 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $9,620 — penalty dated 2025-01-30
• $15,269 — penalty dated 2023-12-06

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ASTON HEALTH — 38 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 23% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL