Baya Pointe Nursing And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 82 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 62.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 45 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 39% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 87.4 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.35 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.32 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.04 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.07 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.46 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.38 to 0.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 62% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-05-26 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain accurate and complete records for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed.Findings include:Review of Resident #1's Discharge summary dated [DATE] documented the discharge location name and address as Resident #1's home address/his Responsible Party/Daughter's home address. There was no documentation of Resident #1's name or that of his Responsible Party/daughter in the section designated for Resident/Representative Acknowledgement.Review of Resident #1's social worker progress note dated 4/23/2026 read, Resident stated that he would like to discharge home to address [an address not listed on Resident #1's admission record] on 4/23/26. Resident stated that brother [name of brother] will be picking him up from the facility.During an interview on 5/26/2026 at 12:54 PM, the Director of Social Work stated, He [Resident #1] wanted to leave and he didn't trust his daughter. I opened the discharge assessment [Discharge Summary] and put the address [of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an accurate and complete clinical record for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for discharge. The discharge documentation contained an inaccurate account of the resident's discharge location and lacked documentation of the resident's discharge disposition and the date and time of discharge.Findings include: During an interview on 5/26/2026 at 12:54 the Director of Social Work stated, He [Resident #1] wanted to leave and he didn't trust his daughter. I open the discharge assessment [Discharge Summary] and put the address [of where the resident is going after discharge]. During an interview on 5/26/2026 at 2:02 PM Staff A, LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) - Unit Manager stated, He (Resident #1) left with his brother on 4/24 [2026]. I do not remember the brother's name, I think it's on the discharge summary. I remember asking his address. I remember cross-referencing the address on the facesheet with [Resident #1's name]. I couldn't…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medical records were accurate for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for wound care, Resident #1.Findings include:Review of Resident #1's physician order dated 12/17/2025 read, Wound Care: Right Buttock; Cleanse with generic wound cleanser, pat dry, place Calcium Alginate [absorbent dressing] over wound bed, then cover with a bordered gauze dressing. Change daily and PRN [as needed] every night shift for wound care. Order Status: Active. Start Date: 12/17/2025.Review of Resident #1's Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for January 2026 for completion of right buttock wound care showed no entries documented on 1/9/2026 and 1/10/2026 on night shift.Review of Resident #1's physician order dated 12/29/2025 read, Wound Care: Clean left buttock with wound cleanser, pat dry, apply skin prep to peri wound, cover with honey gel, then calcium alginate, then cover with silicone superabsorbent [absorbent dressing]: daily and PRN every night shift for wound care tx [treatment]. Order status: Active. Start Date: 12/29/2025.Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer medications as ordered by the physician for 1 of 5 residents, Resident #2, reviewed for unnecessary medications.Findings include:Review of Resident #2's admission record documented diagnosis that include end stage renal disease, chronic systolic congestive heart failure, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease, and essential primary hypertension.Review of Resident #2's physician order dated 4/29/25 read, Entresto Oral Tablet 24-26 MG [milligrams] (Sacubitril-Valsartan) Give 0.5 tablet by mouth two times a day related to essential primary hypertension.Review of Resident #2's August Medication Administration Record documented Entresto had a chart of code 4 (4=outside parameters) on 8/2/2025 at 0900 (9:00 AM), on 8/3/2025 at 0900 and 2100 (9:00 PM), and on 8/6/2025 at 0900. Review of Resident #2's nursing and medication administration notes for the period of 8/1/2025 through 8/9/2025 did not contain documentation of the physician being notified the Entresto was not being…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide respiratory services consistent with professional standards of practice for oxygen administration for 2 of 5 residents, Residents #86 and #87, reviewed for oxygen therapy.Findings include:During an observation on 8/12/2025 at 9:37 AM Resident #87 was observed being administered oxygen via tracheostomy mask at 4 liters per minute by an oxygen concentrator. On the oxygen concentrator was a humidification bottle (used to hold distilled water to add moisture to the oxygen therapy airflow to prevent dryness and irritation that can occur from breathing dry oxygen for extended periods) dated 8/12/25 and the bottle was empty. During an observation on 8/12/2025 at 11:35 AM Resident #87 was observed in bed with the head of bed elevated, and was observed with oxygen being administered via tracheostomy mask at 4 liters of oxygen per minute by an oxygen concentrator. On the oxygen concentrator was a humidification bottle dated 8/12/25 and the bottle was empty. Review of Resident #87's admission record documents…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to prevent the possible spread of infection when failing to ensure staff followed infection control standards for enhanced barrier precautions for 1 of 3 residents, Resident #88 reviewed for incontinence care and failing to ensure hand hygiene was performed during medication administration for 2 of 6 observations of medication administration.Findings Include During an observation on 8/13/2025 at 9:22 AM there was a sign on Resident #88’s door which read, “Enhanced Barrier Precautions (a set of infection control practices designed to reduce the spread of multidrug-resistant organisms).” Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) and Staff B, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) were observed providing incontinent care for Resident #88. Staff A and Staff B were not wearing gowns. During an interview on 8/13/2025 at 9:30 AM the Director of Nursing (DON) verified Resident #88 had a physician’s order for enhanced barrier precautions and staff should have worn a gown and gloves when providing direct patient care. During…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff used appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) while providing high contact care for 1 (Resident #5) of 2 residents reviewed for wound care.Findings include: Review of Resident #5's admission record showed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses including unspecified open wound, right knee, subsequent encounter. During an observation on 6/30/2025 at 11:05 AM, there was a sign posted on the door frame of Resident #5's room that indicated she was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions. During an observation on 6/30/2025 at 11:15 AM, Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), gathered wound care supplies and gloves. Staff A proceeded to wash her hands with soap and water and donned a pair of gloves. Staff A provided wound care to Resident #5, wearing gloves as her only form of personal protective equipment (PPE). During an interview on 6/30/2025 at 11:25 AM, Staff A, LPN, stated, Enhanced barrier precautions are for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-10 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — pattern
  Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received prescribed therapeutic diet for 3 of 5 reviewed residents, Residents #9, #58 and #68. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #58's admission record showed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including stage 3 chronic kidney disease, other speech disturbances, and deaf nonspeaking. During an observation on 5/6/2024 at 12:25 PM, Resident #58 received the afternoon meal tray on his bedside table. There was no health shake on the resident's meal tray. During an observation on 5/7/2024 at 8:03 AM, Resident #58 received the morning meal tray on his bedside table containing scrambled eggs, a slice of toast, and a mound of hot cereal. There was no hot or cold fluids, drinks, or house Health shake on the resident's tray. Review of the facility's dining slip dated 5/7/2024 on the morning meal tray for Resident #58 read, Consistent Carbohydrates (CCD) Tuesday Breakfast: Scrambled eggs…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medical records were complete and accurate for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for nutrition, Residents #9, #58, and #68, and for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for skin conditions, Residents #1, #55, and #227. Findings include: 1. During an observation on 5/6/2024 at 12:25 PM, Resident #58 received the afternoon meal tray on his bedside table. There was no health shake on the resident's meal tray. During an observation on 5/7/2024 at 8:03 AM, Resident #58 received the morning meal tray on his bedside table containing scrambled eggs, a slice of toast, and a mound of hot cereal. There was no hot or cold fluids, drinks, or house Health shake on the resident's tray. Review of Resident #58's physician order dated 4/27/2023 revealed a Health Shake supplement to be given one time a day on the breakfast tray. During an interview on 5/8/2024 at 1:04 PM, Staff B, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), stated, He [Resident #58] loves the Health Shakes, but…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene during medication administration, wound care, and meal service, failed to ensure staff cleaned medical equipment, and failed to ensure staff followed infection control standards for urinary catheter care to help prevent the possible spread and transmission of communicable diseases. Findings include: 1. During an observation on 5/6/2024 from 11:55 AM to 12:15 PM, Staff F, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), and Staff G, CNA, delivered drinks and silverware to residents seated in the dining room at various tables without performing hand hygiene. Staff F donned gloves without performing hand hygiene, scooped some ice into a resident's drink cup, replaced the ice scoop in the ice bucket, and doffed the gloves and did not perform hand hygiene. Staff F and Staff G refilled drink glasses, put cream and sugar in residents' hot drink cups, assisted residents with cutting their food, refilled drinks, brought used plates and dishes to the tray rack, delivered desserts, and picked up…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ASTON HEALTH — 38 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $449K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL