Coastal Health And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 108 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 33.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 96 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 63% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 111.4 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.60 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.34 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.21 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.27 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.73 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.42 to 0.13 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

15 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and review of the facility's Transfer and Discharges policy, the facility failed to notify resident/responsible parties in writing of discharges and transfers, and omitted required information including the date of and the reason for the transfer, the location to which the resident was being transferred, a statement of appeal rights, information about the appeal process, and the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman contact information for one (Resident #1) of four residents reviewed for discharge. The facility also failed to provide a copy to the local Ombudsman office.The findings include:A closed record review for Resident #1 revealed an admission date of 6/21/25 and a discharge from the facility on 7/20/25. Her diagnoses included, but were not limited to, multiple sclerosis, difficulty in walking, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), anxiety disorder, and depression.Review of Resident #1's 5-day initial Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, interviews, and review of facility standards and guidelines for elopement and wandering, the facility failed to immediately report, or within 24 hours of the event, an alleged violation of neglect for one (Resident #2) of two residents sampled for elopement, to the State Survey Agency. The findings include: Review of the facility's 2024 Federal Reports revealed no reports had been filed electronically as required for Resident #2. A review of Resident #2's medical record revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and left the faciity on 4/28/2024. His diagnoses included pneumonia, unspecified organism, anxiety disorder, anemia, other chronic pain, dorsalgia, unspecified, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, stage three, unspecified, difficulty in walking, not elsewhere classified, and muscle weakness (generalized). The resident was prescribed Ativan, one milligram (mg) twice a day for anxiety. A review of a local hospital progress note…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that addressed the sexual relationship for two (Residents #1 and #2) out of 5 residents whose care plans were reviewed. The findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Multiple Sclerosis, Epilepsy, Parkinson's, and Chronic Kidney Disease. A review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed the resident had a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 13 out of a possible 15 points, indicating cognitively intact. Resident #1 was documented as having adequate hearing and vision, clear speech pattern, able to make herself understood and able to express her ideas and wants. A review of the clinical record revealed Resident #2 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-05-18 · tag F0849 — widespread
  Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, facility policy review, the facility's hospice contract review, and medical record review, the facility failed to 1) Ensure residents receiving hospice services had evidence of medical record communication with the hospice provider for seven (Residents #13, #81, #1, #38, #4, #100, and #89) of eight residents receiving hospice services, 2) Ensure evidence of signed contracts for services in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for six (Residents #13, #81, #1, #38, #101, and #89) of eight residents receiving hospice services, and 3) Designate a facility hospice coordinator for eight (Residents #13, #81, #1, #38, #4, #101, #100, and #89) of eight residents receiving hospice services. The findings include: A medical record review revealed that Resident #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition, acute Congestive Heart Failure (CHF), acute kidney failure with tubular necrosis, urinary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-05-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and a review of resident records and facility policies, the facility failed to promote a dignified existence and respect resident privacy and personal spaces by failing to 1) Ensure staff knocked and asked permission before entering six (Rooms 204, 205, 207, 208, 209, 210) of six resident rooms observed, and 2) Prevent one resident (#39) from posting another resident's (#43) name in full view of other residents, staff and visitors, out of a total of 39 residents in the sample. The findings include: 1. During a visit to room [ROOM NUMBER] and an unrelated interview with the occupant (Resident #31) on 05/18/23 at 9:00 AM, Personal Care Attendant (PCA) F entered the room without knocking or asking permission to enter. She went to the B bed where Resident #3 was sitting, picked up her water cup and checked the water level. She repeated this with Resident #31's cup then departed the room. PCA F then walked across the hall and entered room [ROOM NUMBER] without…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-05-18 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, medical record review, and interviews, the facility failed to update and resubmit a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) for one (Resident #48) of two residents reviewed for PASRR, from a total sample of 39 residents. Resident #48 received a new diagnosis which required a new PASRR to be submitted. The findings include: A review of Resident #48's medical record revealed and admission date of 10/27/20 and diagnoses including major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety, dementia, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Further review of the resident's diagnoses revealed that PTSD was added on 10/28/20 and again on 10/30/22. The PASRR was reviewed and noted a Level I without any diagnoses checked. It was dated 10/22/20 and indicated no need for a Level II. The electronic medical record was reviewed, and no additional PASRR was found after the new diagnosis. Resident #48 was observed sitting up in bed eating breakfast on 05/17/23 at 8:35 AM. He received his medications from the nurse and took them with pudding. He was alert, and was speaking…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-05-18 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, interviews, a review of the facility's policy and procedure for Antipsychotic Medication Use, and the facility's Pharmacy Consultant Services Agreement, the facility failed to ensure that its pharmacy consultant reported irregularities to the attending physician, the facility's medical director, and the director of nursing, and that these reports were acted upon for one (Resident #78) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, from a total sample of 39 residents. Resident #78 was receiving psychotropic medications (Seroquel, Lexapro, and Remeron), but he was not being monitored for behaviors or side effects related to these medications, and the pharmacy consultant did not identify or report this as required when completing the monthly review. The findings include: An observation was made of Resident #78 on 5/16/23 at 10:50 a.m. He was in his room lying in bed watching television. He stated he was concerned about his daughter taking his roommate to New York as his roommate requested. His roommate tried to get his daughter to do…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-05-18 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, interviews, and a review of the facility's policy and procedure for Antipsychotic Medication Use, the facility failed to ensure that one (Resident #78) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, from a total sample of 39 residents, received behavior monitoring and monitoring of side effects for the use of psychotropic medications (Seroquel, Lexapro, and Remeron). The findings include: An observation was made of Resident #78 on 5/16/23 at 10:50 a.m. He was in his room lying in bed watching television. He stated he was concerned about his daughter taking his roommate to New York as his roommate requested. His roommate tried to get his daughter to do things for him, and Resident #78 did not like it. An observation was made of Resident #78 on 5/18/23 at 9:40 a.m. He was in his room lying in bed watching television. He stated his roommate was nuts and started talking about his daughter and his roommate going to New York. He stated, My daughter is not taking him to New York. I will take her car away from her. He said he did not want to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-05-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, a review of resident records, and interviews with staff, the facility failed to maintain accurate medical records for one (Resident #9) of one resident reviewed for skin impairment, from a total of 39 sampled residents. The findings include: Resident #9 was observed on 05/16/23 at 9:49 AM. The entire top of her right hand was bruised and purple in color. Resident #9 was unable to report what happened to her hand. On 05/16/23 at 2:23 PM, Resident #9 was interviewed again. She stated she was doing well and denied pain. When asked what happened to her hand she said, Well, I bruise very easily. She was again unable to report what happened and began talking about money and an airport. Resident #9's hand was still purple in color. An observation of Resident #9 on 05/17/23 at 8:49 AM, found the top of her hand was now a faded purple. A record review for Resident #9 found a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/06/23. Resident #9 was assessed with memory problems and severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making. She required extensive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2021-09-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, that included labeling and dating food food items, and thawing food in a safe and sanitary manner, placing the residents at risk of exposure to food-bourne illnesses. The findings include: An initial tour of the kitchen was conducted on 9/7/21 at 9:20 AM with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM). During the tour, an opened package of what the CDM identified as chicken patties was observed in the freezer wrapped in cellophane but not labeled or dated. The CDM stated, I will take care of that and removed the package. In the reach-in/prep refrigerator, there was a clear plastic container containing approximately one quart of what the CDM identified as tuna salad. The container was loosely covered in cellophane, but not dated. The CDM removed the container from the refrigerator then showed both unlabeled items to the cook, who insisted he labeled the tuna that morning. (Photographic evidence obtained) A follow up…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ASTON HEALTH — 38 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL