Nursing & Rehabilitation Center Of New Port Richey

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 75 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 34.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 91 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 58% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 103.9 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.54 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.52 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.12 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.22 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.67 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.63 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable and home-like environment related to bio growth on shower equipment in four communal shower rooms (B, C, E, and F) out of four communal shower rooms observed. Findings include:On 11/20/2025 at 12:01 p.m. an observation was made of the communal showers in B wing. Two of two shower equipment were observed to have brown, pink and black bio growth.On 11/20/2025 at 12:59 p.m. an observation was made of the communal showers in C wing. Two of three shower equipment revealed pink, black and brown bio growth.On 11/20/2025 at 1:09 p.m. an observation was made of the communal shower in E wing. Two of two shower chairs showed pink, brown and black bio growth.On 11/19/2025 at 1:14 p.m. an observation was made of the communal shower room in F wing. One of two shower chairs showed pink and black bio growth.In an interview was conducted on 11/20/2025 at 4:01 p.m. with the Director of Maintenance (DOM). DOM stated showers are expected to be cleaned daily and after each use, and deep…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-11-20 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
  Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program in the facility's common areas (nursing station and dining room); in four rooms (101, 106, 130, 230) located in four wings (B, C, E and F) of four wings observed.Findings included:On 11/19/2025 at 9:15 a.m. an observation of room [ROOM NUMBER]b revealed a small insect crawling on the wall.On 11/19/2023 at 10:52 a.m. an observation was made of the resident's dining area located outside of the kitchen. The observation revealed numerous small flying insects, approximately 10, landing on countertop, cabinets, sink, and icemaker.On 11/19/2025 at 12:14 p.m. an observation was made of an insect flying around and landing on the nurse's station desk located between B wing and C wing.On 11/19/2025 at 3:00 p.m. an observation was made of resident room [ROOM NUMBER] where a gnat was seen flying in the resident's room.An interview was conducted on 11/19/2025 at 1:00 p.m. with the kitchen manager (KM). He…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident medical record review, facility record review, staff and resident family interviews, the facility failed to report and investigate an incident/event for one of one sampled resident, (#12), and who was reviewed as leaving the facility without signing out per the facility's Leave Of Absence rules. It was found the facility did not know Resident #12's whereabouts for over thirty minutes, after he left the facility grounds. Findings included:During an interview with the facility's Nursing Home Administrator (NHA), and the Director of Nursing (DON)/Risk Manager (RM) on 11/19/2025 at 2:45 p.m., both revealed Resident #12 was admitted at the facility from 7/1/2025 through to 10/31/2025, for skilled and therapy services. Also, the NHA and DON/RM revealed Resident #12 was discharged to the community to his daughter's house with Home Health Services, per his discharge care planning on 10/31/2025. The NHA and DON/RM revealed during Resident #12's admission, he was his own decision maker and had an ongoing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-19 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide access to a functional call light for one resident (#3) out of three residents reviewed for call lights. Findings included: On 06/19/25 at 10:16 a.m. an observation and interview with Resident #3 was conducted. She was observed sitting in her wheelchair next to her bed dressed in appropriate day clothes. She stated things are ok. Her call light was observed next to her within reach on her left side, but she stated her call light doesn't work. She stated it is a squeeze call light and has not worked for one week or more. She stated they gave her a ringing hand bell to use but when she uses it, nobody comes. She stated has to wait until she sees someone to receive the care she needs. She stated it scares her. She stated she doesn't get back into bed when she wants to because she is just left in her room and cannot do it herself. She stated she doesn't know if they are doing anything about her call light and feels afraid that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY On 12/4/24 at 9:43 AM, an observation of Resident #157 was conducted in the resident's room. The resident was sitting in his wheelchair next to his bed and pointed to the floor next to the bed on his left side and stated this poop had been on the floor since they changed him the previous night. A brown substance was observed all over the floor next to the resident's bedside and it appeared to be feces. The resident stated he had just finished eating breakfast and confirmed he had to do so with this on the floor next to him. At this time, the surveyor pressed the call light. Staff I and J, both Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs), responded immediately and were interviewed. When asked if the mess on the floor should be there since last night and through the resident's breakfast, they both stated this should have been cleaned and advised they would get housekeeping to do so immediately. Both Staff I, CNA and Staff J, CNA agreed this was not right and it should have been cleaned up the minute it occurred.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-12-05 · tag F0847 — pattern
  Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to explain the arbitration agreement to the resident and/or his or her responsible party (RP) in a form and manner that could be understood, including in a language the resident and his or her RP could understand; for two residents (Resident #359 and Resident #66) of three residents sampled for arbitration agreements. Findings included: On 12/5/24 at 9:57 AM arbitration agreements were reviewed with Staff B, Admissions Director (AD). Staff B, AD presented the electronic version of the arbitration agreement for Resident #359 and Resident #66. The documents were electronically signed by Staff B, AD but not signed by Resident #359, Resident #66, or by either resident's RP. Staff B, AD stated, I didn't have the resident sign the arbitration agreement because it was all verbally explained to the resident on admission, and no one is agreeing or disagreeing with arbitration. They are just explained the process. I offer a copy of any form they sign. At 10:15 AM…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-12-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control and prevention program to prevent the spread of infection by 1.) failing to follow Enhanced Barrier Precautions during catheter care for one resident (Resident #31) of one resident reviewed for catheter care, 2.) failing to ensure resident's meals were delivered in a clean and sanitary manner during one of three meal observations, and 3.) failing to maintain the facility laundry area in a clean and sanitary manner in one of one laundry room. Findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled Infection Control Transmission Based Precautions, date revised February 2024, revealed Enhanced Barrier Precautions can be applied to residents with indwelling medical devices. Review of the facility's policy titled Catheter Care-Quality of Care, date revised January 2024, revealed the facility will maintain infection control guidelines related to catheter care to minimize catheter associated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0557 — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity for one resident (Resident #157) of 37 resident's sampled. Findings included: On 12/3/24 at 2:38 PM, Resident #157 was observed sitting in his room in a wheelchair next to his bed. He stated he is continent of bowel and bladder, but he needs assistance to transfer from his bed to get to the bathroom. The resident stated he has had diarrhea because of the antibiotics he is currently on since he was admitted . He stated it takes the staff forever to come when he presses his call bell to request assistance in getting to the bathroom when he has a bowel movement. Resident #157 stated he has waited for over an hour on many occasions and has to defecate in his brief, and then wait for staff to come and clean him up. He stated this is humiliating and wants to get out of the facility as soon as possible. On 12/4/24 at 9:43 AM, an observation of Resident #157 was conducted in the resident's room. The resident was sitting in his wheelchair next to his…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0636 — isolated
  Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) Comprehensive Assessments contained accurate information for two residents (Resident #46 and Resident #77) of 37 sampled residents. Findings included: An interview with Resident #46 was conducted on 12/3/24 at 1:14 PM. Resident #46 was observed with a discolored area of green and tan to right side of her head above right eyebrow extending to right side of her head. Resident #46 stated I fell out of the wheelchair and broke my neck. A review of Resident #46's 5-Day MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed under Section J - Health Conditions Resident #46 had no falls since admission or prior assessment. An interview was conducted on 12/5/24 at 10:36 AM with the facility's Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated she was aware of Resident #46's fall on 10/13/24 and the resident sustained a fracture from the fall. The DON also stated Resident #46 had just come out of the dining room and was sitting in her…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a Baseline Care Plan within 48 hours of admission for one (Resident #75) of 37 sampled residents. Findings included: Review of Resident #75's medical record revealed Resident #75 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #75's medical record did not reveal a Baseline Care Plan. On 12/5/24 Staff F, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) and Minimum Data Set (MDS) Coordinator provided a copy of Resident #75's Baseline Care Plan and stated it was the one done after the original admission. Review of the Baseline Care Plan revealed it was dated 12/1/24. An interview was conducted on 12/5/24 at 11:57 AM the Facility Administrator (FA). The FA stated Baseline Care Plans should be completed with the admission assessment, within 24 hours. Some of the information comes from hospital records, therapy, and staff, but a main component is to speak to and evaluate the resident. The FA also stated the Baseline Care Plan for Resident #75 dated 12/1/24…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ASTON HEALTH — 38 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL