No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Highlands Lake Center

4240 Lakeland Highlands Rd, Lakeland, FL 33813 · For profit - Corporation · 179 certified beds · (863) 646-8699 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (863) 646-8699 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
No harm-level citations or fines — but 32 lower-level deficiencies on record (see below)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (32) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • about 22% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
  • its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
1/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2080 Meadowland Park Boulevard
Pharmacy
3020 S Combee Rd · (863) 668-8490 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Aldi1.5 mi
2900 Lakeland Highlands Road.
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
4210 Lakeland Highlands Rd · (863) 646-5031

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased6.7%8.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.6%5.5%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.2%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.7%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%4.6%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.9%2.5%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened8.1%9.5%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication33.9%14.4%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%99.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.1%4.5%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control7.7%10.5%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table11.4%8.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.2%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine77.0%94.7%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission26.6%26.1%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.9%9.1%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.002.131.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.741.151.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

38.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 181 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

38.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
13.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
50.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.49U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.25hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.20hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 50.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 93 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.49 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 80% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 41% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF38.9%CMS range 30.5–46.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF13.9%CMS range 10.8–17.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge50.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge36.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge38.7%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified94.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.7%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.8%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization11.3%CMS range 8.0–15.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.231.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.70
RN hours/ resident / day
0.61
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.01
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.32
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.66
RN hoursweekends
53.5%
Total nursing turnover
46.9%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 179 beds and averages 167.3 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.32 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.70 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.01 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.09 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.41 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.72 to 0.66 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

15
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-03-07)
8
at the previous standard inspection (2021-11-18)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the narcotics policy was followed by nursing to ensure narcotic audits were accurate for three residents (#1, #8 and #9) out of three residents sampled for pain management.Findings included:On 11/04/2025 at 8:33 a.m., an interview was conducted with Staff G, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN). Staff G, LPN stated when narcotics are delivered, Staff G, LPN would sign a yellow sheet of paper and a hand-held device where an electronic signature would be required by the pharmacy. A copy would be provided to the nurse. Staff G, LPN stated he would take the prescription along with the actual narcotic card and place the prescription in the narcotic book located on the medication cart and place the narcotic card inside the locked area of the medication cart for narcotics. The copy of the yellow sheet will go to the unit manager's box. Staff G, LPN stated if a narcotic and/or a resident has been discontinued, the process would be to remove…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-05 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure scheduled pain medication was provided as ordered for one resident (#1) out of three residents sampled for pain. Findings included:On 11/04/2025 at 9:06 a.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #1 in his room. Resident #1 was observed adjusting the level of the bed in a more down position and stated he is in a lot of pain. Resident #1 stated, I haven't gotten my pain medication in three days. Resident #1 stated the pain medication he was missing was Oxycontin extended release. Resident #1 stated last night it took over six and a half hours to get his pain medication and then he threw it up. Resident #1 stated his pain is a 10 no, an 11 right now. On 11/04/2025 at 9:15 a.m., an interview was conducted with Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) assigned to Resident #1. Staff A, LPN stated she had recently administered Resident #1's Hydrocodone as scheduled but did not realize the resident was missing his Oxycontin for three…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-17 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to implement an effective grievance program related to ensuring voiced concerns are acknowledged, documented, and resolved for the attending resident council members during six months (November, December, January, February, March and April) of six months reviewed. Findings included: Review of Grievance Logs for a six-month period from November 2024 to April 2025 revealed each month there were on-going call light concerns. Review of the Grievance Log for November 2024 revealed a grievance for Resident #1 dated 11/22/24 for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care not provided, medications left at the bedside, and pain meds not provided in a timely manner. Follow up to grievance revealed: pain medication scheduled for as needed (prn), staff educated on ensuring that the residents receive their medications in a timely manner and as needed, and staff educated on providing ADL care in a timely manner, date resolved 11/22/24. Staff education in-service roster for medications should be administered timely dated 11/15/24. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0773 — isolated
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to obtain physician ordered cultures in a timely manner for two (#1 and #4) of three sampled residents. Findings Included: 1. Review of Resident #1's admission record revealed an admission date of 11/15/24 for short term rehabilitation with diagnoses to include myoneural disorder, acute respiratory failure with hypercapnia, sepsis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and other co-morbidities. Review of Resident #1's medical nurse practitioner progress note dated 12/12/24 revealed: Resident #1 has been having increased episodes of diarrhea, with recommendations to obtain a stool sample. Review of Resident #1's order summary report revealed a physician order dated 12/12/24 and 12/13/24 - obtain stool sample. Review of Resident #1's nursing note dated 12/13/24 revealed collected stool sample for lab. Review of Resident #1's order summary report revealed a physician order dated 12/15/24 obtain urinalysis (UA) for burning during urination. The laboratory results for the UA revealed the lab received the UA on 12/16/24 at 10:26…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure therapy gym equipment was maintained in a safe and operative manner for one of one sampled therapy rooms. Findings included: An interview was conducted on 8/6/24 at 1:25 p.m. with Resident #6. She said she received physical therapy three times a week to help with standing and walking. She said the parallel bars in the therapy gym were not secure. She said one side of the parallel bars moved and the therapist told her the screw was stripped. She said she used the parallel bars, and she asked the therapy staff to have her stand on the side of the parallel bars where the screw was not stripped because she did not want to fall. She also said one of machines in the therapy room was missing a handle. She said she did not use the machine, but she saw other residents using the machine. An observation and interview were conducted 8/6/24 at 2:39 p.m. of the therapy gym equipment. There was one set of parallel bars located in the middle of the room on an elevated surface. The left side of the parallel bar was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-06 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the grievance process was followed for one (#5) of eleven sampled residents. Findings included: A review of Resident #5's clinical record, the face sheet, documented an admission of 03/02/2022, readmission of 01/08/2024. A review of Resident #5's medical diagnosis list included: Parkinson's disease, Diffuse traumatic Brain injury, epilepsy, unspecified convulsions and muscle wasting. A review of the Minimum Data Set Annual Assessment, dated 03/27/2024, showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 6, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. A phone interview was conducted on 08/06/2024 at approximately 4:15 p.m. with Resident #5's family member. The family member stated the resident was transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. The resident had a fever and was shaking on 06/23/2024 but the family member had not been notified of this. A review of the Grievance form, dated 06/27/2024, documented Resident #5's family member submitted a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were secured for three (#6, #7, and #8) out of 11 sampled residents. Findings included: 1. A review of Resident #6's admission Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from an acute care hospital with medical diagnoses not limited to, pulmonary embolism, type 2 diabetes, polyneuropathy, osteoarthritis, chronic pain, right knee effusion, anxiety disorder, and muscle wasting and atrophy. An observation and interview were conducted on 8/6/24 at 1:25 p.m. with Resident #6. The resident was observed to be sitting in her wheelchair next to her bed in front of her over bed table with a multi shelf cart next to her. On the top shelf of the cart there was a box with a tube in it of triamcinolone Acetonide External Cream 0.1% The resident said the cream was hers and she liked to keep it there. A review of Resident #6's quarterly, Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], section C, Cognitive Patterns revealed a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-07 · tag F0582 — pattern
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility 1) failed to provide appropriate notification when changes occur with the resident's coverage for two (#137 and #159) of 3 residents sampled for beneficiary notices, and 2) failed to provide one resident (#368) out of three residents sampled with a refund within 30 days after discharging from the facility. Findings included: Review of Resident #137's record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's last covered day for Part A services was 12/2/23. The resident elected to remain in the facility for Long Term Care (LTC). Review of the Beneficiary Protection Notification Review form and the notice given revealed the resident only received the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC CMS-10123), but did not receive the Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (ABN CMS-10055). Review of Resident #159's record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's last covered day for Part A service was 2/3/24. The resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-07 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure accuracy of comprehensive assessments for three (#135 and #83) of fifty two sampled residents. Findings included: A review of Resident #83's medical record revealed Resident #83 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of cerebral atherosclerosis, dysphagia following cerebral infarction, and dementia. A review of Resident #83's physician's orders revealed an order, dated 10/3/2023, for hospice services for end of life care related to a diagnosis of cerebral atherosclerosis. A review of Resident #83's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 2/28/2024, revealed under Section O - Special Treatments, Procedures, and Programs, Resident #83 was not receiving hospice services during her time as a resident of the facility. An interview was conducted on 3/7/2024 at 10:34 AM with Staff A, MDS Registered Nurse (RN). Staff A, MDS RN stated Resident #83 was receiving hospice services, which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-07 · tag F0644 — pattern
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to complete the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level I upon admission for three residents (#43, #128, and # 98) of seven residents sampled for PASRR Level 1. Findings Included: Review of the admission Record, dated 03/06/2024, showed Resident #43 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include but not limited to major depressive disorder, recurrent, moderate, dementia in other disease classified elsewhere, moderate, with mood disturbance. Review of Resident #43's PASARR, dated 09/14/2022, revealed no qualifying mental health diagnosis and no PASARR Level II was required. Review of an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating intact cognition. An interview was conducted on 03/07/2024 at 2:00 PM., with the Director of Nursing (DON). She said their process is when a resident is admitted to the facility, she reviews the PASRR Level I…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 22 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0675 — failed to support quality of life — isolated
    Honor each resident's preferences, choices, values and beliefs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being related to outside provider appointments for 2 residents (#87 and #135) out of 2 sampled residents. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #87's admission Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from an acute care hospital. Her medical diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and vascular dementia. An interview was conducted on 03/04/24 at 11:11 AM with Resident #87 (Resident Council President) she said she has concerns related to appointments. She said her throat is sore and she is supposed to go see an Ear Nose Throat (ENT) Physician. She said the doctor thought she might've had a small airway and when she was sick and got intubated it might've caused some damage so the doctor wanted me to see an ENT and it's been two months. She said she still does not have an ENT…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide treatment and care to meet the needs of residents by 1.) failing to ensure alterations in skin were identified and treated for one resident (#316) of two residents sampled for skin conditions, and 2.) failed to ensure residents were assessed for a change in condition for one (#366) of five residents sampled for discharges. Findings included: A review of Resident #316's medical record revealed Resident #316 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a readmission on [DATE], with diagnosis of sepsis, urinary tract infection, and Diabetes Mellitus. An observation was conducted on 3/5/2024 at 9:09 AM of Resident #316 in the resident's room. Resident #316 was observed resting in bed and dressed in a hospital gown. Resident #316 was observed to have several red colored abrasions on the upper right side of his chest. The skin surrounding the abrasions was observed slightly red in color. A review of Resident #316's physician's orders…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were obtained related to care and services for catheters, and catheters were appropriately covered for 1 (#218) of 3 residents sampled for catheters. Findings included: Review of Resident #218's record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis that included stage 5 chronic kidney disease, polycystic kidney, and malignant neoplasm of prostate. Observations of Resident #218 on 03/04/24 at 10:48 AM from the hallway revealed a catheter bag hanging on the side of the bed, with urine visible and no privacy bag noted. Review of the residents record revealed there were no current orders for a catheter or for catheter care. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) and the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for the month of March 2024 revealed there was no documentation indicating monitoring or provision of care to the residents catheter. Review of the resident care plan revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure care and services related to Intravenous (IV) fluids were provided for a one resident (#68) out of 1 of four residents with IV access in the facility. Findings included: Observations on 03/04/24 at 10:20 AM of Resident #68 revealed the resident sitting up in his bed. An empty Intravenous (IV) bag was noted hanging at his bed side, but not connected to the peripheral line. During an attempt to interview the resident at this time, the resident was unable to verbalize why or how long he has had the peripheral line. Observations on 03/04/24 at 03:48 PM of Resident #68 revealed the resident seated in his wheelchair next to his bed. The empty IV bag was noted to be hanging at the bed side, but not connected to the peripheral line. Continued observations of Resident #68 at this time revealed the peripheral line inserted into the residents right hand and the dressing noted to be soiled, lifting and with no date. Review of Resident #68's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide respiratory care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice by failing to ensure respiratory equipment was stored in a sanitary manner for two (#218 and #103) of two residents sampled for respiratory care. Findings included: Observations of Resident #218 on 03/04/24 at 10:48 AM revealed a CPAP (continuous positive air pressure) machine on the resident's nightstand. Closer observations at this time revealed the CPAP mask laying unbagged face down on the nightstand. Observations on 03/05/24 at 11:45 AM revealed the resident's CPAP mask laying unbagged, face down on the residents nightstand. Review of Resident #218's record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The record revealed there was no current order for the use of the CPAP, no current order for the care of the CPAP and no care plan in place for the use, monitoring and care of the CPAP. Review of the history and physical dated 3/1/24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure physician ordered pain medication was prescribed for one resident (#72) out of three residents sampled. Findings Included: During an observation on 03/05/24 at 11:59 AM., Resident # 72 was observed in the hallway, fully dressed, propelling in her wheelchair towards Staff M, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN). Resident #72 said she was in a lot of pain since last night and she has not received any of her pain medicine. She said that she has been waiting for her pain medication all night and the nurse told her that they did not have her medication. Resident # 72 was presented with signs of distress on her face. During an observation on 03/06/2024 at 2:00 PM., Resident was observed laying down in her bed with her feet placed on her wheelchair. She said she finally received her pain medication yesterday after having to ask for it multiple times. She said the nurses told her she was not able to receive her pain medication because they did…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than 5%. A total of 25 medication administration opportunities were observed with 3 medication errors for two (#84 and #61) of three residents sampled for medication administration, which resulted in a medication administration error rate of 12%. Findings included: A review of Resident #84's medical record revealed Resident #84 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Diabetes Mellitus and hypertension. A review of Resident #84's physician's orders revealed the following orders: - An order, dated 2/9/2023 for Aspirin 325 milligrams (mg) by mouth (PO) one time a day. - An order, dated 2/9/2023 for Citalopram Hydrobromide 20 mg PO one time a day. - An order, dated 6/22/2023 for Divalproex Sodium 125 mg PO every morning and at bedtime. - An order, dated 2/13/2023 for Cholecalciferol 1000 units PO one time a day. - An order, dated 1/18/2024 for Insulin Glargine 100 units/milliliter…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure proper storage, labeling, and security of medications and biologicals in one of four treatment carts in the facility, three of seven medication carts in the facility, and two of three medication rooms in the facility. Findings included: An observation was conducted on 3/6/2024 at 8:22 AM in the 100 unit of the facility. A medication cart was observed in the unit hallway with a medication cup containing crushed medications on top of it. A resident was observed in a wheelchair next to the medication cart. No staff were observed at the medication cart at the time of the observation. Staff D, Registered Nurse (RN) was observed approaching a treatment cart down the hallway from the medication cart and gathering treatment supplies. Staff D, RN approached the medication cart and an interview was conducted. Staff D, RN stated the crushed medications in the medication cup were for the resident observed near the medication cart. Staff D, RN also stated while preparing the medications, she noticed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain an accurate medical record by documenting treatments, which were not completed, for one (#103) of fifty two sampled residents. Findings included: A review of Resident #103's medical record revealed Resident #103 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of end stage renal disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A review of Resident #103's physician's orders revealed an order, dated 10/25/2023, for oxygen at 2 liters per minute (LPM) via nasal cannula, as needed for shortness of breath per resident preference. Resident #103's physician's orders also revealed an order to change oxygen tubing/mask/bag weekly and as needed. An observation was conducted on 3/5/2024 at 10:00 AM in Resident #103's room. Resident #103 was observed resting in bed with an oxygen nasal cannula in place. Resident #103 stated she would usually wear her oxygen at night, but not during the daytime. An observation of Resident #103's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control and prevention program by 1.) failing to ensure hand hygiene was performed during medication administration and 2.) failing to ensure medications were dispensed in a sanitary manner for one (#84) of three residents observed during medication administration. Findings included: An observation of medication administration was conducted on 3/6/2024 at 8:30 AM with Staff D, Registered Nurse (RN) on the 100 unit of the facility. Prior to the observation, Staff D, RN was observed at a treatment cart near the end of the hallway after assisting a resident. Staff D, RN was not observed performing hand hygiene after handling items in the treatment cart or prior to the observation of medication administration. Staff D, RN reached into her pocket, removed the medication cart keys, and opened the medication cart before preparing the following medications for administration to Resident #84: - Aspirin 325 mg PO, one tablet. - Citalopram Hydrobromide 20 mg PO, one tablet.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to provide a safe and home like environment for one resident (#154) out of 19 residents sampled. Finding Include During an observation on 03/04/2024 at 10:00 AM., Resident #154 was observed laying down in bed with an extension cord in her bed. She said that she uses the cord so that all her electronics can be plugged in to a location that she can reach. She said she has had her extension cord for a while, and she always places it in her bed. She said no one has told her that she the cord is a safety hazard and that she cannot have the cord in her room. During an observation on 03/05/2024 at 2:00 PM., Resident was observed laying down in bed with her call light in reach. Resident extension cord was observed on top of her dresser. She said staff moved her cord so that she can have a bed bath, but staff will put it back in her bed later today. During an interview on 03/06/24 at 04:01 PM with the Maintenance Supervisor. He said residents are not supposed to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program, so the facility was free of pests when one resident (#90) was observed with black ants crawling on him while in bed out of 52 residents sampled. Findings included: Review of Resident #90's admission Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from an acute care hospital with diagnoses of Alzheimer's Disease, muscle weakness, lack of coordination, Type 2 diabetes with foot ulcer, and acquired absence of left great toe. An observation was conducted on 03/05/24 at 2:05 PM. Resident #90 was observed to be lying in bed. Resident #90 was observed to have one small black ant crawling on his sheet over his lap. Staff O, Human Resources (HR) came into the room and pinched the small black ant located on the resident's bedsheet which was laying over his lap. She also confirmed there was another small black ant crawling on his bed next to his shoulder. She stated she was going to get…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-11-18 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure working systems were in place related to food choice, communicating menu options to residents, and assessing for food preferences for eleven (Residents #5, #65, #35, #63, #30, #117, #234, #103, #45, #23) out of 52 sampled residents. Findings included: 1. An interview was conducted with Resident #117 on 11/15/21 at 10:49 a.m. She said the facility did not offer her food choices for her meals, said there was no option to select preferences from a menu, and said, they just bring what they bring. Resident #117 was observed during lunch meal on 11/16/21 at 12:50 p.m. Her tray and meal ticket revealed an entrée of cheese enchiladas, Spanish rice, vegetable blend, and cornbread. The resident said she did not like rice. The meal ticket did not reveal any listing of likes or dislikes. A review of the resident's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-11-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that dignity was maintained related to catheter care for one resident (#374), of 10 residents sampled. Findings Included: On 11/15/21 at 10:44 a.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #374. She was observed sitting in her wheelchair with a [urinary] catheter bag containing amber colored urine, attached to the back of the chair. The [urinary] catheter bag was observed without a privacy bag. Photographic evidence obtained. On 11/16/21 at 11:08 a.m., an observation of Resident #374 was made. Resident #374 was in bed with room door open. The [urinary] catheter bag containing amber colored urine, was observed from doorway, without a privacy bag. Photographic evidence obtained. On 11/17/21 at 9:09 a.m., an observation of Resident #374 was made. Resident #374 was sitting in her wheelchair with the room door open. The [urinary] catheter bag containing amber colored urine, was observed hanging from the back of her wheelchair. The [urinary] catheter bag was observed without a privacy bag. Photographic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-11-18 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the Nursing Home Transfer and Discharge Notice form was provided to the appropriate parties and failed to ensure that the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman received a copy/notification of the Nursing Home Transfer and Discharge Notice for two (#95, #44) of three residents reviewed for admission, transfer, and discharge rights. Findings included: 1. A review of Resident #44's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had an unplanned transfer to an acute care center on 10/15/21. The resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of the facility's Nursing Home Transfer and Discharge Notice revealed a date the notice was given as 10/15/21, the effective date was not decipherable. Page 2 of the Nursing Home Transfer and Discharge Notice under the section that required signatures of the physician was blank. In addition, the section indicating, Notice received by; Resident or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-11-18 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that at the time of transfer of a resident to the hospital or therapeutic leave, the Resident/Representative was provided with a written notice that would indicate the duration of a bed-hold for one (Resident #95) of three residents reviewed for admission, transfer, and discharge rights. Findings included: A review of Resident #95's clinical record revealed she had been discharged from the facility to the hospital on [DATE] and 11/15/21. On 11/18/21 at 1:16 p.m., the Social Service Director, Staff B provided the bed hold notices for 09/21/21 and 11/15/21. Review of the notices revealed no resident or representative signatures indicating receipt of the notices. An interview was conducted with Staff B on 11/18/21 at 1:43 p.m. He confirmed the bed hold notices were not signed by the resident or representative and confirmed that the signatures that were present on the form belonged to facility staff. He said he had not found any evidence in any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-11-18 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, observations, and policy review the facility did no ensure weight loss was identified and addressed in a timely manner for two residents (#47 and #224) of six residents sampled for nutrition. Findings included: 1. Resident #47 was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis of right femur fracture, according to the face sheet in the admission record. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], reflected a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating his cognition was intact. A review of Section K, Swallowing/Nutritional Status, reflected a weight of 238 pounds. Review of the physician's orders in the electronic medical record reflected a diet order dated 8/13/21, Regular diet, regular texture. Review of the weight record in the medical record showed the following weights: 8/13/21 238 lbs. (pounds) 9/5/21 237 lbs. 9/16/21 216 lbs. 10/7/21 221 lbs. 10/14/21 225 lbs. A warning indicated a 5% weight loss in 30 days. 11/4/21 201 lbs. A warning…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based and observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice for three (Residents #65, #68 and #176) of 18 sampled residents related to the use and storage of oxygen masks and tubing. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #176's medical record revealed that she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses that included acute systolic Congestive Heart Failure, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease with acute exacerbation, moderate persistent Asthma, and solitary pulmonary nodule. Observations of Resident #176 on 11/15/21 at 12:45 p.m., revealed that she was sitting up in her wheelchair next to her bed with oxygen (O2) running via nasal cannula. Closer observations revealed the oxygen tubing lying across the floor. Continued observation of the resident's room at this time revealed that the resident had a night stand next to her bed close to the window. It was noted that the resident had a Continuous Positive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility did not ensure two (Residents #123 and #225) of five residents reviewed for medication availability, received their physician ordered medications. Findings included: A review of the face sheet in the admission record for Resident #123 revealed an admission diagnosis of respiratory failure with hypercapnia and COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease). An observation was conducted on 11/16/21 at 9:34 a.m. during medication administration with Staff A, LPN (licensed practical nurse) for Resident #123. During the observation an interview was conducted with Staff A, LPN who stated that there was an inhaler, Wixela, being sent for Resident #123 after the insurance approved it. It had not arrived yet. Staff A, LPN said the Wixela inhaler was ordered on the tenth. She said the insurance had to approve it. Staff A, LPN said she was not sure if Resident #123 had it and it ran out. But it was ordered the ninth. This inhaler takes awhile. She did not know the reason. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-18 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility did not ensure the medication error rate was below 5% for one (Resident #123) of four residents with twenty-seven opportunities observed during medication administration, resulting in a medication error rate of 7.41%. Findings included: A review of the face sheet in the admission record for Resident #123 reflected an admission diagnosis of respiratory failure with hypercapnia and COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease). An observation was conducted on 11/16/21 at 9:34 a.m., during medication administration with Staff A, LPN (licensed practical nurse). During the observation, an interview was conducted with Staff A who stated that there was an inhaler, Wixela, being sent for the resident after the insurance approved it. It had not arrived yet. Staff A prepared medications for Resident #123. After knocking on the door and announcing herself, Staff A put on a pair of gloves and gave Resident #123 her pills with water. Next, Staff A removed a small volume nebulizer (SVN) mask from a bag dated 11/15/21 and squeezed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-02-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and review of the facility policy, the facility did not ensure that refrigerated controlled Schedule II-IV medications were secured in a locked and permanently affixed compartment in 3 (Park Place, [NAME] Point, and [NAME] Court) medication storage rooms of 3 medication storage rooms. Findings included: On 02/27/20 at 11:48 a.m. the Park Place medication storage room was observed with Staff B, Registered Nurse (RN). An unlocked refrigerator was observed to be opened by Staff B, RN. A locked black plastic box, approximately 4 inches x 18 inches, was observed on the second shelf inside the refrigerator and was not permanently affixed. The black box was taken out, placed on the countertop and unlocked by Staff B, RN. Observed inside the box was a labeled plastic bag that contained a small bottle of oral Ativan, a Schedule IV medication. (Photographic Evidence Obtained). The medication and the box were placed back into the refrigerator. On 02/27/20 at 11:55 a.m. the [NAME] Point…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-28 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, interviews, and policy review the facility did not ensure that the medication error rate was less than 5 percent in regards to 6 errors in 27 opportunities for one resident (#278) out of 7 sampled residents, resulting in a 22.2%. medication error rate. Findings included: Resident #278 was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis of congestive heart failure (CHF), according to the face sheet in the admission record. On 2/28/20 at 10:10 a.m. an observation was conducted during medication administration with Staff E, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN). Staff E, LPN poured medications for Resident #278, including spironolactone 25 mg (milligrams), furosemide 20 mg, sertraline 25 mg, glucosamine chondroitin complex two pills, omeprazole 40 mg, and losartan potassium 25 mg. Resident #278 came into the hallway where Staff E, LPN was pouring her medications, and was heading to therapy. Staff E, LPN told Resident #278 she was preparing her medications. Resident #278 waited next to the medication cart where Staff E, LPN was preparing the medications. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ASTON HEALTH — 38 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.7-0.7 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.2+0.8 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.1≈ chain avg
The other 37 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.7★, per CMS)
1 of 5Crescent Health And Rehabilitation CenterSarasota, FL 1 of 5Kensington Gardens Rehab And Nursing CenterClearwater, FL 1 of 5Nursing & Rehabilitation Center Of New Port RicheyNew Port Richey, FL 1 of 5Oak Haven Rehab And Nursing CenterAuburndale, FL 1 of 5Vero Beach Care CenterVero Beach, FL 2 of 5Baya Pointe Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterLake City, FL 2 of 5Capri Health And Rehabilitation CenterVenice, FL 2 of 5Creekside Health And Rehabilitation CenterSarasota, FL 2 of 5Fairway Oaks CenterTampa, FL 2 of 5Flagler Health And Rehabilitation CenterBunnell, FL 2 of 5Haines City Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterHaines City, FL 2 of 5Indian River CenterWest Melbourne, FL 2 of 5North Port Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterNorth Port, FL 2 of 5Pensacola Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterPensacola, FL 2 of 5Riverwood CenterJacksonville, FL 2 of 5Sandgate Gardens Rehab And Nursing CenterFort Pierce, FL 2 of 5Sea Breeze Rehab And Nursing CenterVero Beach, FL 2 of 5Tierra Pines CenterLargo, FL 2 of 5Viera Del Mar Health And Rehabilitation CenterViera, FL 2 of 5Winter Garden Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterWinter Garden, FL 3 of 5Cedarbrook Health And Rehabilitation CenterFort Myers, FL 3 of 5Coquina CenterOrmond Beach, FL 3 of 5Eagleridge Health And Rehabilitation CenterFort Myers, FL 3 of 5Fouraker Hills Rehab And Nursing CenterJacksonville, FL 3 of 5Hillside Health And Rehabilitation CenterZephyrhills, FL 3 of 5Oakpark Health And Rehabilitation CenterPalm Harbor, FL 4 of 5Bridgeview CenterOrmond Beach, FL 4 of 5Coastal Health And Rehabilitation CenterDaytona Beach, FL 4 of 5Debary Health And Rehabilitation CenterDebary, FL 4 of 5Fernandina Beach Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterFernandina Beach, FL 4 of 5Island Lake CenterLongwood, FL 4 of 5Meadowpark Health And Rehabilitation CenterDunedin, FL 4 of 5Parkside Health And Rehabilitation CenterDeland, FL 4 of 5Ruleme CenterEustis, FL 4 of 5Seaside Health And Rehabilitation CenterDaytona Beach, FL 5 of 5Bayview CenterEustis, FL 5 of 5Osprey Point Nursing CenterBushnell, FL

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
GABRIEL LIVING CENTER, LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/15/2023
HIGHLANDS LAKE HOLDCO LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/15/2023
LCE PARTNERS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/01/2021
FRIEDMAN, LEOPOLDIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/15/2023
GUTMAN, SAMUELIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/01/2021
BURGESS, TAMMIEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 05/08/2025
PRASHAD, SHALIZAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 11/07/2023
REINOSO, JOSEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/10/2022
THACKER, TRICIAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/04/2022
WILLIAMS, ELLISIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/02/2024
ASTON HEALTHCARE LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/09/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$20.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+25.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$3.3M
Related-party expense22% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 46%Medicare 13%Other / private 41%

This home reported $3.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 22% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$244per resident / day
operating cost
$7,418per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$328per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Florida
$10,342/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,610/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 105620. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-03-07, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next