Coquina Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 220 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 51.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 122 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.46 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 77% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 114.6 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.42 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.26 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.07 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.11 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.54 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.31 to 0.13 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

• Potential for harm · E2026-02-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that three (Residents #1, #8 and #20) of three residents reviewed for dignity were able to exercise their right to dignity. Staff referred to Residents #1 and #8 as feeders, and were observed standing over Residents #1, #8 and #20 while assisting them with their meals. The findings include:1.On 2/23/26 at 12:10 PM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) I was observed in Resident #1's room assisting her with her lunch meal. Resident #1 was lying in bed while CNA I stood over her feeding her food from her lunch tray. This observation lasted five minutes. During an interview with CNA I at the time of the observation, she was asked if Resident #1 normally required assistance with her meal. CNA I stated the resident was a feeder but that she did not usually feed the residents and was not sure if the resident normally required assistance.On 2/25/26 at 12:00 PM, CNA F was observed in Resident #1's room assisting her with her lunch meal.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to send a copy of the notice to a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman for one (Resident #128) of two residents reviewed for transfer/discharge. The findings include: A record review for Resident #128 revealed that the resident had been emergently transferred on 1/8/26. A nursing note dated 1/9/26 at 7:30 AM revealed: Upon coming onto my shift at 11pm, I received in report from the 3-11 nurse that (Resident #128's physician) had come to the facility and initiated customer to being (emergently transferred) related to aggressive behaviors toward staff. Police officer was already on site and EVAC (emergency medical transportation) arrived at approx 11:10 in which I helped assist the medics transfer resident onto the stretcher. Per police officer, customer was being transferred to (local) hospital.During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 2/25/26 at 12:58 PM, she was asked if Resident #128 had been transferred or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to review the accuracy and completion of the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) forms for two (Residents #70 and #44) of two residents reviewed for PASRR completion. Failure to ensure the accuracy/completion of the residents' PASRRs placed the residents at risk for not receiving needed services.The findings include:1.A review of Resident #70's medical record revealed an admission date of 7/29/24 with diagnoses including brief psychotic disorder, major depressive disorder (MDD) - recurrent, insomnia, and signs/symptoms involving cognitive functions and awareness. An active physician's order dated 1/7/25 revealed Escitalopram Oxalate (antidepressant) Tablet 10 mg (milligrams) - Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day related to major depressive disorder.A review of the active care plan (revised 11/12/25) revealed that the resident was at risk and/or had actual impaired cognitive function/impaired thought processes related to a diagnosis of brief psychotic disorder, unspecified signs and symptoms involving…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to check gastric residual volume (GRV) for one (Resident #52) of three residents reviewed for enteral nutrition. Failure to check for gastric residual volume can result in accidental inhalation of food/liquid into the airway and lungs instead of the esophagus, which can lead to choking, lung infections and/or breathing difficulty.The findings include:A review of Resident #52's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/2/25 with diagnoses including quadriplegia (paralysis resulting in partial or total loss of function in all four limbs and the torso), protein-calorie malnutrition, gastrostomy (feeding tube) status, metabolic encephalopathy (brain dysfunction causing symptoms like confusion, delirium, tremors and/or seizures), expressive language disorder (difficulty expressing thoughts, ideas and feelings despite having normal comprehension).A review of the resident's active physician's orders revealed: Enteral Tube: Flush tube with 60 ml (milliliters) of water every 1 hour while feeding in progress. Total…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections, by repeatedly failing to ensure that one (Resident #1) of one resident who was reviewed for urinary catheter care, had a urinary catheter bag that was kept off the floor. Failure to ensure a urinary catheter bag remains off the floor can result in a catheter-associated urinary tract infection.The findings include: On 2/23/2026 at 12:10 PM, Resident #1 was observed lying in bed. Her urinary catheter bag was observed on the door side of her bed and was observed to be resting on the floor. (Photographic evidence obtained) On 2/24/2026 at 9:58 AM, Resident #1 was observed lying in her bed. Her urinary catheter bag was observed on the door side of her bed and was observed to be resting on the floor. (Photographic evidence obtained) On 2/24/2026 at 12:40 PM, Resident #1 was observed lying in her bed. Her urinary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-05-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facilty failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for one (Resident #48) of 39 residents sampled. Resident #48 received no flushes to her Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) line. The findings include: A review of Resident #48's medical record revealed she was admitted on [DATE] with a readmission on [DATE]. The resident was transferred to a hospital on 5/18/22 to have a PICC line removed. The PICC line was present on the 3/1/22 readmission. Resident #48 was admitted with diagnoses including encephalopathy, pressure ulcer - stage IV to sacrum, severe sepsis, aphasia, and major depressive disorder. A 5/16/22 observation of Resident #48 at 1:59 PM, revealed a left subclavian central line (SCL) with a transparent dressing covering the insertion site. The date on the dressing was illegible. On 5/17/22 at 3:48 PM, the left SCL had a transparent dressing covering the insertion site. The site was clean,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-05-19 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to 1) Ensure that a resident with limited range of motion received appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion and/or to prevent further decrease in range of motion, and 2) Ensure residents received appropriate services, equipment, and assistance to maintain or improve mobility with maximum practicable independence for one (Resident #107) of 39 residents sampled. The findings include: On 5/16/2022 at 1:00 p.m., Resident #107 was observed with a left hand contracture. During an interview with the resident at this time he stated he denied having a splint for his left hand, but stated he thought he needed one and had mentioned this to the staff without success. A medical record review revealed that Resident #107 was admitted into the facility on 8/22/2021. His last readmission was on 9/14/2021. His diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting the left non-dominant side; congestive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-05-19 · tag F0849 — isolated
  Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to 1) Maintain a hospice plan of care and documentation of care in the resident record, 2) Designate a member of the facility's interdisciplinary team to coordinate care, and 3) Coordinate Hospice care for one (Resident #111) of five residents reviewed for hospice services/coordination of care, from a total sample of 39 residents. The findings include: A review of Resident #111's medical record revealed an admission date of 5/28/19 with diagnoses including non-infective gastroenteritis and colitis, dysphagia, hemiplegia and hemiparesis on left side, dementia, delusional disorders, major depressive disorder with mixed anxiety, and depressed mood. The resident had an active Do Not Rescusitate order. A review of the Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 3/24/22, revealed she was receiving Hospice services. A review of Resident #111's physician's orders revealed a Do Not Resuscitate order dated 1/28/22. On 1/22/22, a Hospice consult was ordered. On 2/1/22, Hospice Medicaid began. A 5/17/22 review of the active Care Plan, revealed a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ASTON HEALTH — 38 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 23% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL