Island Lake Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 267 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 46.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 104 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.41 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 70% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 34% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 111.3 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.484 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.38 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.05 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.17 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.61 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.45 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

15 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2026-03-26 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
  Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assessment & Assurance (QAA) / Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee conducted performance improvement activities to ensure prior improvement measures were sustained which had possibility to affect 113 of 113 residents in the facility.Findings: Review of the undated facility's QAPI Program revealed the objective of the program was to provide a means to establish and implement performance improvement projects to correct identified negative or problematic indicators. The document indicated the components of this process included tracking and measuring performance; identifying and prioritizing quality deficiencies; developing and implementing corrective action or performance improvement activities; and monitoring or evaluating the effectiveness of corrective action/performance improvement activities and revising as needed. During the previous recertification survey conducted 1/27/25 through 1/30/25, the facility had deficiencies cited related to medications left at bedside, and for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to honor a resident's advanced directive wishes and failed to ensure the medical record accurately reflected advanced directives related to Do Not Hospitalize for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for Advance Directives, of a total sample of 40 residents, (#49).Findings: Resident #49 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including senile degeneration of brain, depression, age-related physical debility, cognitive communication deficit and vascular dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set significant change assessment with assessment reference date of [DATE] revealed resident #49 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 8/15 which indicated she had moderate cognitive impairment. The assessment revealed she required assistance with activities of daily living and received hospice care services. Review of resident #49's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed a physician order dated [DATE] for Do Not Resuscitate (DNR). This order was also…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to request a new Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level I Screening for a resident later diagnosed with a new mental illness diagnosis for 1of 1 residents reviewed for PASARR, of a total sample of 40 residents, (#78).Findings: Resident #78 was admitted to the facility from an acute care hospital on [DATE] with a diagnosis of major depressive disorder. Review of resident #78's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed she had a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 15 out of 15, cognitively intact. Review of resident #78's PASARR Level I screening completed on 9/23/25 was negative for mental illness or intellectual disability. Review of the order summary for resident #78 dated 3/24/26 revealed she had been prescribed Mirtazapine, an antidepressant, at bedtime for poor appetite related to depression on 3/04/26. On 3/23/26 at 1:30 PM, resident #78 was in her room sitting in her wheelchair. She had her lunch…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to refer a resident with identified mental illness for a Level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) evaluation and determination for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for PASARR, of a total sample of 40 residents, (#106).Findings: Resident #106 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including bipolar disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder and adjustment disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set admission assessment with assessment reference date of 1/13/26 revealed resident #106 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 11/15 which indicated she had moderate cognitive impairment. The document indicated her active diagnoses included anxiety disorder and bipolar disorder and received antipsychotic, antianxiety and antidepressant medications. Review of resident #106's electronic medical record revealed a Level I PASARR screening form dated 1/06/26. The form indicated resident #106 had bipolar…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an individualized on-going activity program designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for activities, of a total sample of 40 residents, (#52).Findings: Resident #52 was admitted to the facility 8/30/25. admission diagnoses included arthritis of the hip, type two diabetes, total retinal detachment of the right eye, and blindness in left eye. The [NAME] Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed resident #52 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 10/15 which indicated he had moderately impacted cognitive impairment. The assessment indicated the resident required full assistance with meals, toileting, hygiene, and transfers. His preferences included television movies, sports, classic rock and country music, audible books, sports and bingo. The setting preferences for activities reflected to take place both outside and inside the room. Review…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice related to acknowledging and following the consultant dermatologist's recommendations for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for non-pressure skin concerns, of a total sample 40 residents, (#30). Findings: Resident #30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included vascular dementia and atopic dermatitis (dry, itchy skin). On 3/22/26 at 10:00 AM, resident #30 was in her room scratching her wrists. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed resident #30 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 3/15, indicating severe cognitive impairment, and she exhibited rejection of care behaviors 1 to 3 days in the lookback period. Resident #30 was dependent on toileting, personal hygiene, dressing, and mobility. Active diagnoses included atopic dermatitis and dementia. On 3/22/26 at 10:00 AM, resident #30 was in her…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow physician's orders consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 out of 4 residents reviewed for respiratory care, of a total sample of 40 residents, (#92). Findings: Resident #92 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, Type two Diabetes Mellitus and dementia. A review of the Annual Minimum Data Set with assessment date 1/29/26 revealed resident #92 was cognitively impaired with a Brief Interview for Mental Status of 0 out of 15. Review of the medical record revealed documentation that resident #92 had a change in condition on 3/06/26. The documented assessment revealed the resident had shortness of breath and her oxygen saturation was at 88%. Subsequent orders from the physician on 3/06/26 included delivery of continuous oxygen at 2 liters per minute (LPM) via nasal cannula, provide portable oxygen tank for 2 LPM nasal cannula, monitor oxygen…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and accurate administration of medication to meet the needs of residents, for three of six residents reviewed for medication administration, of a total sample of 40 residents, (#41, #37, and #77).Findings: 1. Resident #41 was admitted on [DATE] from an acute care hospital with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease, dementia with psychotic disturbance, gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) and dysphagia-oral phase. The American Speech-Language-Hearing Association says a disorder in swallowing is called dysphagia. Dysphagia oral phase is a problem with sucking, chewing and moving food and/or liquid into the throat which could lead to it going into the airway (aspiration), and pneumonia or other lung infections, (retrieved on 4/08/26 from www.[NAME].org). Review of resident #41's current physician orders revealed medications including Sucralfate one Gram tablet, by mouth, four times a day for GERD. The instructions…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed transmission-based precautions to prevent spread of infection and ensure residents were provided a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment by preventing the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 out of 1 resident reviewed for transmission based precautions, of a total sample of 40 residents, (#56).Findings: On 3/22/26 at 10:15 AM, room [ROOM NUMBER]'s door was open with a Contact Precaution sign posted but nothing on the sign to identify which bed was on precautions. A nursing student completed hand hygiene and donned gloves then walked into room [ROOM NUMBER] to see resident #56 in the B bed by the window. Registered Nurse (RN) H was outside the room at her medication cart. RN H completed hand hygiene and proceeded into room [ROOM NUMBER] bed B to see resident #56 and administered oral medications. RN H did not don gloves or gown. RN H and the nursing student exited the room,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, and interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment for resident dining in the upstairs Vista View unit dayroom for 9 of 40 residents sampled. Findings: On 1/27/25 at 11:55 AM, in the Vista View dayroom nine residents were sitting around tables waiting for lunch. There were no tablecloths or centerpieces on the tables and staticky music was playing from a radio in the background. The Social Services Assistant (SSA) changed the channel several times in an attempt to find appropriate dining music but the static persisted. A short time later at 12:07 PM, lunch trays were delivered to the residents in the dayroom. The plates, cups, bowls and eating utensils were left on the trays and not set on the table for dining. On 1/30/25 at 12:00 PM, approximately eight residents were engaged in an activity in the Vista View dayroom. The meal cart with residents' lunches sat in the hall unattended. A few minutes later, the meal trays were passed to residents in their rooms and residents were guided back to their rooms to eat. No one ate…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ASTON HEALTH — 38 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 24% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL