North Port Rehabilitation And Nursing Center
6940 Outreach Way, North Port, FL 34287 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (941) 426-8411 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (33) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $14,770 in federal fines (most recent 2023-10-18)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 6.2% | 8.7% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 10.3% | 5.5% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.7% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.4% | 4.6% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.4% | 2.5% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 7.6% | 9.5% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 17.2% | 14.4% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 99.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.7% | 4.5% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 4.6% | 10.5% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 11.1% | 8.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 50.9% | 94.7% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 18.9% | 26.1% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 10.5% | 9.1% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.12 | 2.13 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.31 | 1.15 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
25.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 115 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 67.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 59 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.45 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 76% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 25.0%CMS range 18.2–31.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.3%CMS range 7.0–15.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 67.8% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 62.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 61.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 98.1% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 98.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.9% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.8%CMS range 4.8–12.4 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.13 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 116.6 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.42 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.50 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.08 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.10 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.55 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.59 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
33 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide maintenance services to ensure a clean, safe, and comfortable environment in the residents' designated smoking area and 1 (Rosebud unit) of 1 unit observed with stained ceiling tiles, and 2 (Rooms #134 and #176) of 60 rooms observed. The findings included: On 7/14/24 at 9:26 a.m., a nursing staff member was observed wiping condensation from the air conditioner vent near the Rosebud Nursing station. Eleven of the ceiling tiles around the vent showed signs of leaking from the ceiling. An area of black growth was observed on the wall near the ceiling next to the rosebud nursing station. On 7/15/24 at 11:00 a.m., in an interview the Regional Manager of Operations said the roof was leaking. On 7/11/24 an inspector came out and was working on obtaining an estimate for the necessary repairs. She provided documentation from a roofing company describing the damage found to the roof on 7/11/23. She stated a lot of what was seen on the tiles…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to maintain personal hygiene for 3 (Residents #20, #33, and #167) of 8 sampled residents dependent on staff for activities of daily living, including showers, incontinent care and nail care. The findings included: 1. Record review revealed Resident #20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included history of Bipolar Disorder, Anxiety, Major Depressive Disorder, Unspecified Mood Disorder, Dementia with behavioral disturbance, Confusional Arousal, Congestive Heart Failure, Chronic Kidney Disease, Anemia, and Hypertension. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] noted Resident #20's cognition was severely impaired with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 07. The assessment noted Resident #20 was dependent on staff for personal hygiene. On 7/15/24 at 9:28 a.m. Resident #20 was observed lying in the bed. Resident #20's left hand was contracted. Resident #20…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-18 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical well-being for 1 (Resident #418) of 1 sampled resident receiving dialysis. The findings included: 1. The facility policy and procedure titled, Standards and Guidelines: Dialysis Care, with an effective date of 10/2014 and a revision date of 1/2024, stated the facility will implement individualized plans of care to include the interdisciplinary team as well as the dialysis care team in coordination with the attending physician. The Procedure included, Correspondence from the dialysis center will be addressed by facility staff and will be recorded in the plan of care as indicated; The facility will provide a snack/meal to the resident per request prior to or after dialysis appointment . Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #418 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD), Hypertension (HTN), Anemia and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-18 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide sufficient staffing to ensure 6 residents of 40 residents surveyed (#3, #14, #20 #33, #58, and #65) received appropriate ADL care and ensured call lights were answered in a timely manner. The findings included: On 7/15/24 at 11:47 a.m. Resident #3 said she waits an hour for staff to respond to her call light. Last night I was up all night because any time I had to urinate I would have to wait an hour to get back to bed. The aide came in and said what do you want I explained I needed wiped and assisted back to bed by lifting my legs. The aide wiped me and left the room. I put my light back on and she came back and said what do you want I explained I needed someone to lift my legs in the bed. The aide told me she had other things to do. She said she had to tell her it would only take a minute for her to lift her legs. She said it is hard when the aid does not know what you need. On 7/15/24 at 1:20 p.m. Resident #65 said when she uses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-18 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, review of facility's policies and procedures, and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure 4 (Residents #4, #63, #67 and #418) of 5 sampled residents were free from significant medication errors. The findings included: The facility policy Medication Administration (Revised 1/2024) documented Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame . Only persons licensed or permitted by this state to prepare, administer, and document the administration of medications may do so . Medications errors are documented, reported, and reviewed by the QAPI [Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement] committee to inform process changes and the need for additional training . If a drug is withheld, refused or given at a time other than the scheduled time, the individual administering the medication shall document the rational in the resident's medical record and notify the physician and the responsible party if indicated . 1. On 7/15/24 at 11:43 a.m., observation of the medication cart of the rose bud unit with Licensed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store medications in a safe, secure manner for 3 (Residents # 67, #4, and #63) of 3 residents reviewed for medication storage. The findings included: Medication Storage and Labeling policy issued 3/2021 and Revised 1/2024 said Drugs and biologicals used in the facility must be labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles . Procedure noted Drugs and biologicals are stored in the packaging, containers, or other dispensing systems in which they are received . The nurse staff is responsible for maintaining medication storage and preparation areas in a clean, safe and sanitary manner. On 7/14/24 at 11:11 a.m., Resident #67 was observed in bed. Nystatin powder and multiple pills were noted in a medicine cup on her breakfast tray. Resident #67 stated the nurse leaves these here so I can take them with my breakfast. Photographic documentation obtained. On 7/15/24 at 2:04 p.m., a medication cup with five pills was observed unsecured on Resident #67's bedside table. In an interview Resident #67 said the nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident representative and staff interviews, the facility failed to promote the residents' rights to be involved in medication management, including being informed of the risks and benefits for use of psychotropic medications for 1 (Resident #20) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medication use. The findings included: Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included history of Bipolar Disorder, Anxiety, Major Depressive Disorder, Unspecified Mood Disorder, Dementia with behavioral disturbance, and Confusional Arousal. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] (Federally mandated assessment to evaluate the health and functional capabilities of residents) noted Resident #20's cognition was severely impaired with a Brief Interview for Mental Status Score of 07. The MDS noted the resident was displaying verbal (threatening others, screaming at others, cursing at others) and physical behavioral symptoms (hitting,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure 1(Resident #39) of 3 sampled residents reviewed received the Skilled Nursing Advance Beneficiary of Non-coverage (CMS-10123) to inform the resident of potential liability for payment and related standard claim appeal rights. The findings included: Review of Resident #39's census data information revealed Resident #39's services in the facility were covered by Medicare Part A, effective 11/17/2023. Review of Resident #39's coverage notice records revealed a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage form that documented Resident #39's skilled nursing services would end on 2/13/24. Review of the Beneficiary Protection Notification Review form completed by the Minimum Data Set Coordinator revealed the facility initiated Resident #39's discharge from Medicare Part A Services with benefit days remaining. Review of Resident #39's coverage notice records failed to reveal any documentation that Resident #39 had been provided with the Skilled Nursing Advance Beneficiary of Non-Coverage notice (CMS-10123). On 7/18/24 at10:45 a.m., in an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident family and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the Baseline Care Plan (BCP) was provided to the resident and their representative with a summary of the baseline care plan that included but was not limited to the initial goals of the resident, a summary of the resident's medications and dietary instructions, any services and treatments to be administered by the facility and any updated information for 1 (Resident #94) of 3 residents reviewed for BCP. The findings included: Review of Resident #94's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with admission diagnoses of altered mental status, hypertension, muscle weakness, open wound of lower leg, and paroxysmal tachycardia. The admission Nursing Evaluation dated 1/3/24 stated the BCP was reviewed by the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) and Other, and a copy of the BCP and medication reconciliation were offered to the resident/representative/family member. The nurse also documented they had discussed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the clinical record, review of facility policy and procedures and staff interviews, the facility failed to have documentation of blood sugar results as ordered for 1(Resident #53) of 1 resident reviewed with diabetes. The findings included: The facility policy Physician Orders issued 1/1/23 documented All physician orders must be followed as prescribed, and if not followed, the reason must be recorded on the resident's medical record during that shift. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #53 had a readmission date of 12/19/23 with diagnoses including stage 3 chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes. The physician orders included to inject Lantus insulin, 10 units subcutaneously at bedtime. The physician's orders dated 1/16/24 read, May obtain finger-stick blood sugar twice daily. Notify physician for results < (less than) 60 and > (greater than) 300. Review the Medication Administration Record (MAR) and the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for April 2024, May 2024, June 2024 and July 2024 showed each day at 9:00 a.m., and 9:00 p.m., the nurses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 23 citations
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-16 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — patternImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and medical record review, the facility failed to notify the resident representative of significant changes for two (Resident #4 and Resident #6) of 4 residents reviewed for significant changes. The findings included: The facility policy issued 5/2017 and revised 6/2023 for Change in Resident Condition or Status - Resident Rights Standard states the facility shall notify the resident, his or her Attending Physician, and representative of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status. Unless otherwise instructed by the resident, a nurse will notify the resident's representative when there is a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status. Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from the hospital for rehab after Urinary Tract Infection and Cerebrovascular Accident. Her BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) was 99 which indicates resident not cognitively intact. A skin check dated 3/7/24 in Resident #4's medical record read…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-27 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of facility's policy and procedure, resident representative and staff interview, the facility failed to implement their policies and procedures, and immediately address an allegation of staff to resident abuse for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, Misappropriation, Mistreatment, and injury of unknown origin( ANEMMI) revision 10/2022 noted physical abuse included, Hitting, slapping, pinching, and kicking. The policy listed several criterias, including any resident or family complaint of physical harm, pain or mental anguish resulting from willful infliction from others, will be considered as possible ANEMMI. The policy specified any employee having either direct or indirect knowledge of any event that mighty consitute Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, Misappropriation, Mistreatment, and injury of unknown origin must report the event promptly. Residents will be protected from harm…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, review of facility's policy and procedure, resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the reporting of an allegation of staff to resident abuse to the State Survey Agency, and Adult Protective Services within the specified timeframe for 1 resident (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, Misappropriation, Mistreatment, and injury of unknown origin( ANEMMI) revision 10/2022 noted, with response to allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, the facility must: Ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect . are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse OR result in bodily injury . The facility procedure noted, any and all staff observing or hearing about such events must report the event immediately to the Administrator, immediate Supervisor AND one of the following: Director of Nursing, ANEMMI Prevention Coordinator, or Risk…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-18 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, records review, review of policies and procedures, the facility failed to implement their policies and procedures and accommodate the preferences of 4 (Residents #2, #4, #6 and #7) of 4 residents reviewed for smoking. The findings included: Review of the undated facility's document titled, Resident smoking at North Port Rehab signed by each resident who smokes noted, 1. I agree to follow the smoking schedule set forth by the facility. The times are posted on the door to the door to the courtyard. 2. I agree to follow the policy and procedure on smoking, and I am only allowed to smoke with supervision. 3. I will not smoke outside by myself. 4. I agree to smoke only in the designated smoking area only. 5. I agree I will not smoke in my room. 6. I agree I will not smoke around oxygen. 7. I agree to turn in my cigarettes and lighter or any other smoking materials to the person that is supervising me smoking. 8. I agree not to keep my smoking materials in the room. I understand that if I do not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This failure is evidenced by staff having personal drinks, personal phones, and a bucket of sanitizing agent on the food preparation counter during meal preparation. The findings included: Review of facility policy titled Food Storage with an effective date of 1/15/2021 noted, To ensure that all food served by the facility is of excellent quality and safe for consumption, all food will be stored according to the current Federal and State Food Code . Do not use or store cleaning materials or other chemicals where they might contaminate foods . On 10/17/23 at 10:00 a.m., a tour of the meal preparation area of the kitchen was done with Dietary cook/ supervisor Staff B. Staff B said, Sorry about the mess, I am making lunches now. An uncovered container of steamed whole Brussel sprouts, an uncovered container of chopped meat, and utensils were observed on the meal preparation counter. Two personal cell phone, two…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-18 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff and resident representative interviews, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident #8) of 7 sampled residents was treated with dignity and respect in that the facility failed to ensure the resident was properly dressed when transported to an outside provider's appointment. The findings included: On 10/17/23 at 11:55 a.m., Resident #8 was observed in a reclining wheelchair in the lobby with her sister. She was partially covered with a blanket, and was wearing a long, short sleeved T-shirt. Resident #8's sister lifted the blanket which showed the resident was dressed in a T-shirt and incontinent brief. The shirt was not long enough to cover the brief. She was not wearing any bottoms, socks, or shoes. An orthopedic boot was observed on the resident's right lower leg. Resident #8's sister was visibly upset and speaking to the staff in a loud voice saying, I should call the police. My sister had plenty of warm clothing and you sent her out to the doctor's office with just a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-03-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the policies and procedures, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to evaluate and modify interventions to prevent avoidable accidents for 1 resident (#358) of 1 resident reviewed who was identified as being at risk for falls and sustained multiple falls while at the facility, including a fall resulting in a transfer to the hospital. The findings included: The policy and procedure for managing falls and fall risk stated the staff would identify interventions related to the residents' specific risks and causes to try to prevent the resident from falling and minimize complications from falling. The staff will implement a resident-centered fall prevention plan to reduce the specific risk factors for each resident at risk of falls or with a history of falls. The resident-centered approaches to managing fall and fall risk state if a fall recurs despite initial interventions, staff will implement additional or different interventions or indicate why the current…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-03-31 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — patternProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, review of facility policy and procedures and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain an indwelling catheter in a safe and sanitary manner for 1 (Resident #84) of 1 resident sampled with an indwelling catheter. This has the potential to cause injury and urinary tract infection. The findings included: Facility policy Catheter Care Urinary documented The purpose of this policy is to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Be sure the catheter tubing and drainage bag are kept off the floor. Review of Resident #84's clinical record showed an admission date of 7/11/22 with diagnoses including obstructive and reflux uropathy (urine is unable to pass through the urinary tract). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) (standardized assessment tool that measures health status in nursing home residents) with an assessment reference date of 2/22/23 documented Resident #84 was dependent on staff for toileting needs. The MDS noted Resident #84's cognitive skills for daily decision making were severely impaired. The care plan identified Resident #84 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-31 · tag F0700 — patternTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to review the risk and benefits of bed rails, attempt alternative interventions prior to bedrail installation and failed to have a schedule for routine maintenance for 2 (Resident #68 and #308) of 7 residents reviewed for side rails. The findings included: Review of the facility policy titled Proper use of Side rails issued 09/2022 and last revised 09/2022 guidelines read: A side rail evaluation will be completed to determine the resident's need for using side rails; Alternative options may be trialed and documented prior to implementation of side rails; Side rails may be used if assessment and Interdisciplinary team review has determined that they are needed to help manage a medical symptom or condition, or to help the resident reposition or move in bed and transfer, and no other reasonable alternatives can be identified; The resident care plan will address the use of side rails when applicable; Facility will follow…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-03-31 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to administer medications according to physician's orders and manufacturer's specification for 4(Residents #9, #18, #41 and #509) of 5 residents observed for medication administration. Three licensed nurses on the morning shift with 26 opportunities were observed. Eleven medication errors were observed resulting in a 42.31% error rate. The findings included: 1. On 3/27/23 at 9:59 a.m., Registered Nurse (RN) Staff B was observed administering an enteric coated aspirin 81 milligrams (mg) to Resident #18. RN Staff B removed the medication from the bottle and placed it in a clear medication pouch and crushed the tablet. RN Staff B placed the crushed tablet in applesauce and administered the medication to Resident #18. Crushing enteric coated tablets may result in the drug being released too early, destroyed by stomach acid or irritating the stomach lining. 2. On 3/27/23 at 10:05 a.m., RN Staff B was observed administering 3 medications to Resident #41 including a tablet of Amantadine HCL 100 mg RN…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-03-31 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff and family interview the facility failed to implement effective corrective actions to maintain compliance for deficiencies identified during the recertification survey completed on 3/31/23. The findings included: 1. On 5/15/23 at 12:38 p.m., quarter bed rails were observed in the up position for Resident #501, admitted [DATE]. At the time of the observation, Resident #501 said they have been on her bed since admission and said no one discussed the risks vs benefits of side rails with her and she said she did not sign a consent for use of bed rails. Record review revealed no evidence of discussion of risks vs benefits or signed consent. There was evidence of a side rail assessment completed on 5/5/23 that noted rails were not necessary at the time. 2. On 5/15/23 at 1:20 p.m., quarter bed rails were observed in the up position for Resident #502, admitted [DATE]. At the time of the observation, Resident #502's husband said the rails have been on the bed since admission…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-31 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, review of facility policy and procedure, staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to accommodate the preference for morning showers for 1(Resident #4) of 26 residents sampled for activities of daily living (ADL'S). The findings included: The facility policy Activities of Daily Living, (revised 3/18) specified Residents will be provided with care, treatment and services as appropriate to maintain or improve good nutrition, grooming and personal hygiene . Interventions to improve or minimize a resident's functional abilities will be in accordance with the residents' assessed needs, preferences, stated goals and recognized standards of practice. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #4 had an admission date of 7/22/22 with diagnoses including dementia, anxiety, major depressive disorder, and weakness. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) (standardized assessment tool that measures health status in nursing home residents) with an assessment reference date of 1/25/23 documented Resident #4 required extensive assistance with transfers, personal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-31 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the clinical record, review of facility policy and procedures and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to maintain personal hygiene for 1(Resident #96) of 26 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL's). The findings included: The facility policy Activities of Daily Living, (revised 3/18) specified Residents will be provided with care, treatment and services as appropriate to maintain or improve good nutrition, grooming and personal hygiene. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #96 had an admission date of 3/7/23 with diagnoses muscle weakness, need for assistance with personal care, chronic pain, falls, and atherosclerotic heart disease. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) (standardized assessment tool that measures health status in nursing home residents) with an assessment reference date of 3/7/23 documented Resident #96 was dependent on staff for bathing. The MDS noted Resident #96's cognitive skills for daily decision making was intact. The plan of care initiated on 3/8/23…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-31 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to ensure 3 (Residents #14, #458 and #459) of 3 dependent residents reviewed for those residents who attend activities, maintained and/or improved their psychosocial well-being and independence. The findings included: On 3/27/23 review of the Director Recreational Therapy job duties stated they were required to plan, direct, and coordinate recreation-based treatment programs to help maintain or improve a patient's physical, social, and emotional well-being. They were required to oversee day-to-day activities of residents, initiate, and promote activities within the facility and stimulate patient interests and well-being, regulate programs in accordance with the patient capabilities, and maintain all activity related records of activity assessment, progress notes, and discharge summary. 1. Review of Resident #14's medical record revealed his original admission to the facility was 3/26/2019 with a readmission on [DATE]. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-31 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, resident and staff interview, the facility failed ensure 1 (Resident #75) of 2 sampled residents received prompt assistance to repair broken glasses to maintain vision ability. The findings included: Clinical record review revealed Resident #75 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] noted the resident used corrective lenses. On 3/28/23 at 1:49 p.m., Resident #75 said she uses bifocal corrective lenses. She said, I can't see without them. I need them to look at my phone. The resident explained a while ago, one arm broke after a staff member rolled her to her side. The staff person tried to glue it together. The arm broke again. The resident said she's been using the glasses with one arm. Resident #75 said a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) rolled her over yesterday afternoon. She did not take off her glasses quickly enough and the other arm broke completely. The CNA just took the broken glasses and placed them on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-31 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, resident and staff interview the facility failed to follow physician's orders for oxygen therapy for 3 (Resident #8, #17, and #23) of 4 residents reviewed for oxygen administration. Failure to follow prescribed oxygen therapy may result in inadequate oxygen treatment or an increased risk of side effects and complications. The findings included: 1. Review of the clinical record for Resident #8 revealed an admission date of 2/3/23. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with a target date of 2/7/23 revealed Resident #8 scored a 13 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status, indicative of intact cognition. Resident #8's diagnoses included lung disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and respiratory failure with hypoxia (low level of oxygen). The physician's orders included Oxygen at 2 liters per minute via nasal cannula every shift. On 3/27/23 at 11:10 a.m., Resident #8 was observed lying in bed, the oxygen (O2) was set at one and half liter (L) per minute via nasal cannula (n/c). Resident #8 stated she uses O2 at home at 2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-31 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, policy review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure medication irregularities and/or concerns were addressed in a timely manner when the consulting pharmacist identified irregularities and/or medication concerns, for 1 (Resident #14) of 5 resident's medication regimen reviewed. The findings included: On 3/30/23 review of Resident #14's medication regimen revealed he was receiving Gabapentin capsule 100 mg, 2 capsules, by mouth 3 times a day for neuropathy. Gabapentin was used to prevent and control seizures and relieve nerve pain. Some of the common side effects listed with the administration of Gabapentin were drowsiness, dizziness, fatigue, loss of coordination. Review of Resident #14's medical record revealed he had 2 unwitnessed falls on 11/15/22 and 11/17/22 and 1 witness fall on 11/6/22. On 12/12/22 the Consultant Pharmacist identified a potential medication concern stating Resident #14 was currently receiving Gabapentin which had the potential for dizziness and drowsiness and increased the risk of falls. Review of Resident #14's clinical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-31 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and staff and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident #75) of 1 resident received timely dental treatment to maintain her ability to chew. The findings included: Resident #75 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Cerebral Infarction, Diabetes, Hypertension, Anemia, Congestive Heart Failure, and dependence on oxygen. Section B of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] indicated the resident had no dental problems. The Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) was a level 6, which meant severely impaired cognition. The clinical record review noted Resident #75 had a dental consult ordered for right cheek pain on 3/2/23. She is a Medicaid recipient. On 3/28/23 at 9:21 a.m., Resident #75 stated she does not recall seeing the dentist but has mouth pain when chewing on the right side. She has been chewing on the left side. On 3/29/23 at 11:55 a.m., the Social Services Director (SSD) stated she contacted the dental provider on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-08-26 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — patternRegularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to conduct regular inspection of all bed frames, mattresses, and side bed rails, as part of a regular maintenance program to identify areas of possible entrapment. The findings included: On 8/26/21 at 10:00 a.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) said the facility staff conducted a facility wide side rail audit to determine how many facility beds had side rails attached, how many residents had side rails on the bed, and which resident had orders for the use of the side rails. She said they currently had a resident census of 80, with 41 facility beds with side rails attached and 38 residents evaluated for the use of the side rails which was confirmed via a tour of the facility. On 8/26/21 review of the facility's Bed Maintenance and Inspection policy dated 11/2017, #5 stated, bed frame, mattress, and bed rail inspections will be conducted upon each item entering the facility and then place on a regularly scheduled inspection and maintenance cycle according to the manufacture's recommendations, to include…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, sanitary, and homelike environment as evidenced by dry wall damage in resident's rooms, broken and missing floor tiles, discolored floor tiles, dusty bathroom vents, missing and/or discolored caulking around the base of the toilets in the resident's room. Failure to identify and complete needed repairs could cause safety and sanitary hazards to vulnerable residents. The findings included: On 8/23/21 an environmental tour was conducted at approximately 9:00 a.m., and the following resident's room and facility damages were noted: 1. Rooms 150 to 170, the floor tiles were discolored with a thick wax build up on the bathroom tiles. The vent in the bathrooms had a thick layer of dust. 2. rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] had missing floor tiles. 3. room [ROOM NUMBER], the drywall behind the window bed was damaged and part of the caulking around the base of the toilet was missing and discolored. 4. room [ROOM NUMBER], the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-08-26 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident #55) of 2 residents reviewed for activities of daily living for grooming had nail care completed in a timely manner. The lack of routine grooming could affect a resident's psychosocial well-being and the prevention of infection. The findings included: On 8/24/21 at 10:04 a.m., observed Resident #55 in bed with her feet exposed. This observation revealed, all of Resident #55's toenails were long, discolored, and thick. The right foot big toenail and 4th toenail extended approximately ½ inch from the base. The left foot big toenail extended ½ inch and curved at a 90-degree angle to the toe. On 8/26/21 review of the facility policy titled, Care of Fingernails/Toenails version 1.2, stated the purpose of this procedure was to clean the nail bed, to keep nails trimmed, and to prevent infections. Under the General Guidelines it stated nail care included daily cleaning and regular trimming. The staff were to report any changes in color of the skin around the nail bed, blueness of the nails, any…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-26 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to review the risks and benefits of bed rails with the resident or resident representative and obtain informed consent prior to installation for 2 residents (Resident #4 and #17) of 3 residents reviewed for bed rails. The findings included: 1. Review of facility policy titled, Proper Use of Side Rails revised December 2016 which stated, The purpose of these guidelines are to ensure the safe use of side rails as resident mobility aids and to prohibit the use of side rails as restraints unless necessary to treat a resident's medical symptoms. And The use of side rails as an assistive device will be addressed in the resident care plan. Consent for using restrictive devices will be obtained from the resident or legal representative per facility protocol. On 8/23/21 at 10:00 a.m., Resident #4 was observed in bed asleep, with elevated side rails in use on both sides of his bed. On 8/24/21 at 10:47 a.m., Resident #4 bed observed with side rails elevated. On 8/25/21 at 8:41 a.m., Resident #4 observed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of facility policy and procedure and staff interviews, the facility failed to assure the facility's medication cart was locked and under direct observation of authorized staff in an area where residents and staff could access it for 1 of 2 medication carts reviewed. The findings included: Review of facility policy titled, Medication Storage in the Facility, dated April 2018, stated in policy section, Medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely and properly, following manufacturer's recommendations or those of the supplier. The medication supply is accessible only to licensed nursing personnel, pharmacy personnel, or staff members lawfully authorized to administer medications. On 8/24/21 at 3:17 p.m., medication cart C was observed unlocked and unattended with drawers facing hallway by resident room [ROOM NUMBER]. Two residents were observed independently moving via wheelchairs in hallway near cart while unattended. On 8/24/21 at 3:23 p.m., observed Licensed Practical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$14,770 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $14,770 — penalty dated 2023-10-18
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to ASTON HEALTH — 38 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 2.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.1 | +0.9 vs chain |
The other 37 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.7★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NP REHAB HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 12/03/2018 |
| QUALITY REHAB PARTNERS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 12/03/2018 |
| WILDES, DONNA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/28/2025 |
| GLEICHER, HERMAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/03/2022 |
| KOCH, RACHEL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 02/18/2025 |
| VILLEGAS, ALEXIS | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/13/2024 |
| ASTON HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2022 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $2.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in FL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 105523. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-07-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.