Sandgate Gardens Rehab And Nursing Center
703 S 29th St, Fort Pierce, FL 34947 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 107 certified beds · (772) 466-3322 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high number of inspection citations overall (45) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (58%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- about 22% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 8.3% | 8.7% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.1% | 5.5% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.7% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.8% | 4.6% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.0% | 2.5% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 6.8% | 9.5% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 8.3% | 14.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 99.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.1% | 4.5% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 27.1% | 10.5% | 21.2% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 5.7% | 8.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.1% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 87.7% | 94.7% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 25.7% | 26.1% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 4.9% | 9.1% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.04 | 2.13 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.14 | 1.15 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
30.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 71 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 41.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 108 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.45 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 76% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 30.5%CMS range 20.8–41.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.8%CMS range 7.3–15.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 41.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 53.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 27.8% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 63.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 95.7% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 97.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.7% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.6% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.5%CMS range 4.7–14.0 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.22 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 107 beds and averages 102.6 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.52 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.49 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.16 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.19 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.66 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.58 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
45 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 35 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and assistive equipment to prevent 1 of 3 sampled residents, Resident #1, from having a fall with injury.The findings included:Record review revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of a quarterly assessment dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 00 on a 0-15 scale, indicating unable to assess. Review of the medical diagnosis for Resident #1 documented a history of hemiplegia (paralyzed on one side) affecting the dominant side on the right, traumatic brain injury, aphasia (difficulty expressing words), and history of falls. Review of a report dated 10/22/25 documented Resident#1 was found on the floor lying on her left side after reportedly rolling off the bed while being assisted by one staff for incontinent care. The resident was assessed, and a small amount of bleeding was noted from the resident's mouth. There was no documentation related to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-18 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, menu review, and interview, the facility failed to follow the menu for 1 of 2 observed meals (lunch on 04/16/25) affecting 96 of 99 resident who consume food orally. The findings included: Review of the menu for the lunch meal on 04/16/25 documented the following menu items. The following observations were made on the tray line in the kitchen on 04/16/25 beginning at 11:30 AM: a) The menu for the regular Philly Beef sandwich was documented to include a cheese sauce made with a cheese sauce mix and hot water. The observed sandwiches, prepared by the cook for the regular and mechanical soft diets, was topped with shredded cheese. b) The menu for the regular lunch meal was to contain a parsley sprig for garnish. The cook added finely chopped parsley to the top of the sandwich. c) The menu for the mechanically altered Philly Beef sandwich was to contain the same cheese sauce as the regular texture, along with a parsley sprig. The cook prepared the sandwiches for this diet with shredded cheese and finely chopped parsley. d) The menu for the pureed Philly Beef…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-18 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the form of food met the needs of residents who consume pureed and mechanical soft foods for 1 of 2 meals observed (lunch on 04/16/25), affecting sampled Residents #69, #31, #82, and #30 who consume pureed foods, and affecting sampled Residents #59, #2, #73, #12, and #58 who consume mechanical soft foods. This practice had the potential to affect 12 of 99 residents who consume pureed foods, and 20 of 99 residents who consume mechanical soft foods (20). The findings included: An observation of the lunch meal on 04/16/25 revealed the main entree was a Phili Beef Sandwich. Review of the recipe for the ground meat sandwich revealed the cook was to place the cooked meat into a food processor and process lightly to a coarse consistency. During the observation of the food service line beginning on 04/16/25 at 11:30 AM, the cook had a tray of cooked beef that contained large pieces of meat. The only other meat on the food service line was a pureed meat. Review of the recipe for the pureed meat documented the cook was to place…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-18 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that resident choices of television channels were respected for 1 of 5 sampled residents reviewed, Resident #34. The findings included: Clinical record review showed that Resident #34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and again on 06/02/24, with diagnoses that included anxiety disorder and depression. The quarterly comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating he was cognitively intact. No mood or behavior concerns were noted. According to the quarterly activity assessment dated [DATE], Resident #34 spends time reading and watching TV (television) in his room. He enjoys sports but prefers not to participate in group programs, stating that he does not want to get out of bed. On 04/14/25 at 9:31 AM, Resident #34 expressed frustration with the facility's cable system, stating, We don't have a lot of channels. He indicated that although there were supposed to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-18 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete comprehensive assessments within 14 days of admission, or annually in a timely manner, for 4 of 21 sampled residents, Residents #14, #61, #84, and #151. The findings included: Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Required Assessment Summary dated October 2024, revealed the resident's admission comprehensive assessment must have an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) no later than the 14th calendar day of the resident's admission, and must be completed no later than the 14th calendar day of the resident's admission. This document also revealed the Annual comprehensive assessment must have an ARD 366 calendar days after the last comprehensive assessment and be completed no later than 14 calendar days after that ARD. Review of the records revealed the comprehensive assessments were not completed timely for the following residents: a) Resident #14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and the comprehensive assessment was completed on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-18 · tag F0638 — isolatedAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete quarterly assessments no less than every 3 months for 3 of 21 sampled residents, Residents #14, #21, and #61. The findings included: Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Required Assessment Summary dated October 2024, revealed the resident's quarterly assessment must have an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) 92 calendar days after the previous quarterly assessment, and must be completed no later than the 14th calendar day after the ARD date. Record reviews revealed the following quarterly assessments were not completed timely: a) The quarterly assessment with an ARD of 06/10/24 for Resident #14 was completed on 07/17/24. b) The quarterly assessment with an ARD of 09/10/24 for Resident #14 was completed on 10/03/24. c) The quarterly assessment with an ARD of 03/11/25 for Resident #14 was completed on 04/14/25. e) The quarterly assessment with an ARD of 05/25/24 for Resident #21 was completed on 06/21/24. f) The quarterly assessment with an ARD of 03/06/25 for Resident #21 was completed on 04/10/24. g)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-18 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for 4 of 21 sampled residents, as evidenced by inaccurate dialysis coding for Resident #86, inaccurate medication coding for Residents #70 and #31, and inaccurate hospice coding for Resident #69. The findings included: 1. Review of the record revealed Resident #86 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of physician orders and progress notes lacked any indication the resident had received any dialysis services. During an interview on 04/14/25 at 11:15 AM, Resident #86 stated he was not receiving dialysis services, and had never received them. Review of the admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident was receiving dialysis services. During a side-by-side record review and interview on 04/17/25 at 11:38 AM, the MDS Coordinator agreed with the inaccurate MDS for Resident #86. 2 Review of the clinical records revealed Resident #31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and again on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-18 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure communication with a resident who was unable to speak English for 1 of 2 sampled residents, Resident #60. The findings included: Review of the policy titled Standards and Guidelines: ADL [Activities of Daily Living] Care and Services issued 04/2020 and revised 01/2024, documented, 4. Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently, with the consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care, including appropriate support and assistance with: e. Communication (speech, language, and any functional communication system.) Review of the facility's current admission packet documented in the section titled Nondiscrimination & Accessibility Requirements . The facility provides the following: Free language services to people whose primary language is not English, such as: qualified interpreters; information written in other languages. Review of the record revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide nail care for 3 of 3 sampled residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Livings (ADLs), Residents #59, #13, and #4. The findings included: 1. Review of the policy titled Standards and Guidelines: ADL Care and Services, issued 04/2020 and Revised 01/2024, documented, 4. Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently, with the consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care, including appropriate support and assistance with: a. Hygiene (bathing, dressing, grooming, mail care and oral care . Review of the record revealed Resident #59 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and Aphasia (loss of ability to understand or express speech) following cerebral infarction (a serious condition where blood flow to the brain is blocked, leading to tissue damage and death.) Review of the current…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure appropriate care and services for 2 of 6 sampled residents, as evidenced by the lack of offloading (relieve pressure) of a surgical wound for Resident #75, and failure to follow physician ordered parameters for antihypertensive (blood pressure) medications for Resident #82. The findings included: 1. Review of the record revealed Resident #75 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the current Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Further review of this assessment documented the resident had a surgical wound. Review of the wound care progress note dated 04/07/24 and written by Staff G, the wound care nurse practitioner, revealed the resident was to offload her heels as per the facility protocol. A second noted dated 04/14/25 documented, in part, to continue to reduce pressure to wound…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 35 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-18 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure appropriate and timely administration of antibiotics for 1 of 1 sampled resident, Resident #86, who had a Urinary Tract Infection (UTI). The resident was subsequently admitted to the hospital and returned to the facility with the diagnosis of sepsis secondary to the UTI, with additional orders for intravenous (IV) antibiotics. The findings included: Review of the record revealed Resident #86 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Urine for a urinalysis was collected by staff at the facility on 03/24/25 and the results were reported to the facility on [DATE] as positive for a Urinary Tract Infection (UTI). The culture was attached to this report and indicated, in part, that the bacteria was resistant to Cipro, an antibiotic often used to treat a UTI. This urinalysis report was not signed off as having been reviewed. Review of the orders revealed Cipro was ordered to be administered twice daily for the UTI as of 03/31/25, five days after the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-18 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to identify and treat pain appropriately for 4 of 4 sampled residents, as evidenced by failure to identify and treat pain for Resident #60; failure to ensure pain medication availability for Resident #84; failure to ensure appropriate indication of use of medication for Resident #86; and failure to ensure pre and post assessment for PRN (as needed) pain medication for Resident #151. The findings included: Review of the policy titled, Standards and Guidelines: Pain Evaluation and Management, issued 7/2020 and revised 2/2024, documented, Guideline: Pain Management is defined as a process of alleviating the resident's pain based on his or her clinical condition and established treatment goals. Pain management is a multidisciplinary care process acute pain (or significant worsening of chronic pain) should be evaluated upon onset and re-evaluated as indicated until relief is obtained. For stable chronic pain the resident's pain and consequences of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-18 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure appropriate drug regimen reviews for 2 of 5 sampled residents as evidenced by the failure to follow pharmacy recommendations for Resident #151, and failure to provide rationale for physician disagreement in a pharmacy recommendation for Resident #70. The findings included: 1. Review of the record revealed Resident #151 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment dated [DATE], documented the resident was cognitively intact with a score of 15. Review of the pharmacy recommendation dated 04/03/25 documented the resident was recently started on a Nicotine patch 14 mg for smoking cessation without a stop date. This pharmacy review recommended to taper to 7 mg after 6 weeks, and to evaluate and add order to discontinue the order in 6 weeks, then start 7 mg for 2 weeks, then discontinue. The physician agreed with the recommendation. Review of the current orders documented the resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-18 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure indication of use, rationale, or behavior for antipsychotic use for 1 of 5 sampled residents, Resident #70, related to anti-psychotic medication. The findings included: Review of record revealed Resident #70 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis in part which included Encephalopathy, unspecified, cognitive communication deficit and unspecified dementia, unspecified severity without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance and anxiety. Review of record revealed Resident #70 was prescribed an anti-psychotic medication on 01/30/25. During observations on 04/14/25 at 9:43 AM, and 1:05 PM, on 04/15/25 at 8:25 AM, and 9:25 AM, Resident #70 was either sitting up in bed or in a wheelchair in her room willing to answer a few basic questions about her meal and how she was feeling. On 04/16/25 at 11:20 AM, Resident #70 was observed sitting in her wheelchair outside with other residents and staff from the Activities…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to secure medications in 1 of 5 medication carts B unit, and ensure medication was not found at the bedside for Resident#11. The findings included: On 04/14/25, at 11:05 AM, the surveyor observed a cup of pills on the bedside of Resident #11. One pill was yellow and oval, while the other was round and white. During an interview at 11:10 AM the same day, the surveyor asked Staff K, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), to check the room. She acknowledged the presence of the pills on the table. She explained that the yellow pill was Protonix, used for gastroesophageal reflux disease, and the white pill was Amlodipine, prescribed for hypertension. On 04/17/2025, at 9:07 AM, the medication cart in Unit B was found in front of room [ROOM NUMBER], with the drawers facing the room. The cart was left unlocked and unattended. The surveyor stood by the cart for about 3-5 minutes to monitor it. During this time, a nurse was observed exiting from another room across the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow infection control practices for 1 of 5 sampled residents on Enhance Barrier Precaution (EBP) and 3 of 3 sampled residents with Contact Precautions as evidenced by failure to implement Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) and EBP orders for Resident #21 who had a wound; failure to have orders and implement Contact precautions for Residents #2, #86, and #84. The findings included: Review of the policy, titled, Standards and Guidelines: Enhanced Barrier Precautions. issued 03/2024 and revised 05/28/24 documents, Definitions: Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) refers ton infection control intervention designated to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO) that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities .Procedure .1.Enhanced Barrier Precautions are used for resident's with any of the following: .b. Wounds and/or indwelling medical devices even if the resident is no known to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-18 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to administer intravenous (IV) antibiotics timely for 1 of 1 sampled resident, Resident #151. The findings included: Review of the policy, titled, Medication Administration revised 01/2024 documented, in part, 6. Medications are administered within one (1) hour before or after their prescribed time, unless otherwise specified (for example, before and after meal orders, at bedtime). Review of the record revealed Resident #151 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis to include Endocarditis (infection of the heart) and multiple fractures. Review of the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment dated [DATE], documented the resident was cognitively intact with a score of 15. Review of the current orders documented Resident #151 was to be administered 'ceftriaxone 2 grams intravenously (IV) every 12 hours for Endocarditis for 38 Days'. During an interview on 04/14/25 at 10:44 AM, Resident #151 explained he was on an IV antibiotic for his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-18 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the pneumococcal immunization for a resident with signed consent for 1 of 5 sampled residents, Resident #24. The findings included: Review of the policy, titled, Standards and Guidelines: Immunizations-Pneumonia, issued 07/2020 and revised 02/2024, documented: 1. Upon admission, residents will be assessed for eligibility to receive the pneumococcal vaccine series, and when indicated, will be offered the vaccine series within thirty (30) days of admission to the facility unless medically contraindicated or the resident has already been vaccinated 2.Assessments of pneumococcal vaccination status will be conducted within five (5) working days of the resident's admission if not conducted prior to admission .4. Pneumococcal vaccines will be administered to residents (unless medically contraindicated, already given, or refused) in accordance with Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines .6 Residents who decline the vaccine will be educated on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical and administrative record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that 3 of 3 sampled residents, Residents #1, #2 and #3, reviewed for pressure ulcers, received the necessary treatment and services in a timely manner, consistent with professional standards of practice to promote healing, as evidenced by the staff failed to ensure that a resident who is admitted with a Stage III pressure ulcer received the necessary care and services for 10 days; failed to provide evidence that weekly skin assessments were completed; and failed to provide evidence that the prescribed treatments were performed as prescribed and documented accordingly. The findings included: 1. Review of the clinical record for Resident # 1 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Metabolic Encephalopathy, Sepsis, and Traumatic Brain Injury. Review of the 11/06/24 second skin assessment documented the resident had a 1 x 0.4 x 0.9 cm open area on the right lower…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-21 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — patternHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the right to smoke during designated times for 1 of 1 sampled resident who voiced concerns, Resident #152, and affecting 16 current residents who smoke, including an additional 5 of 6 sampled residents, Residents #32, #34, #63, #151, and #325. The findings included: During an interview on 12/18/23 at 10:14 AM, Resident #152 voiced concerns about the ability to smoke while residing at the facility. Resident #152 voiced they had designated smoking times of 9 AM, 1 PM, 4 PM, and 7 PM, but they have trouble getting it opened. When asked what she meant by that, Resident #152 stated when it's the scheduled smoking times, the area will be locked and staff won't know who is assigned to man the area. Review of the record revealed Resident #152 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed it was still in progress but the section for cognitive status had been complete…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services to provide a clean, comfortable and homelike environment on 2 of 2 units, the outside smoking patio and the common areas of the facility. The findings included: During a tour of the facility conducted on 12/21/23 at 10:09 AM, accompannied by the Maintenance Director and the Maintenance Assistant, the following was observed: a. On the patio outside of the Activity Room on the 100 Unit, which is the designated smoking area, there was an accumulation of cigarette butts in the planters, the ground around the planters, and the area just outside of the door that leads from the Activity Room to the patio. b. In the Main Dining Room, the metal frames around the air conditioning vents were noted to be rusted and damaged and there were several ceiling tiles that showed signs of water damage. c. In room [ROOM NUMBER], the baseboard was not secured under the air conditioning unit, the privacy curtain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-21 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program, as evidenced by pest sightings in the room of Resident #25, the main dining room / activities room, the 100 and 200 units' Clean Utility rooms, and documentation of pests in room [ROOM NUMBER]. The findings included: During an interview, on 12/18/23 at 11:22 AM, with Resident #25, with a documented Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating 'cognitively intact', when asked of the presence of pests, Resident #25 stated that she had seen roaches on the floor the previous day. During an observation at the conclusion of the interview, live roaches were observed in all stages of life and too numerous to count, behind the resident's nightstand. During an observation in the Main Dining Room / Activities Room, on 12/18/23 at 1:44 PM, two live and mature roaches were observed in a cabinet. During an observation of the 200 unit 'Clean Utility' room, which was used as a unit pantry, on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to implement care plans for the use of bed rails for 2 of 2 sampled residents reviewed for bed rails, Resident #20 and Resident #151. The findings included: The facility's policy, titled, Proper Use of Side Rails, revised December 2016, documented, in part, under the section for General Guidelines: 4. The use of side rails as an assistive device will be addressed in the resident care plan 1. Resident #20 was admitted on [DATE]. Review of the resident's most recent complete Medicare 5-Day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/07/23, documented Resident #20 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating cognition was intact. The assessment documented the resident had no impairments to the upper extremity and was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder with no incontinent devices in use. Resident #20's diagnoses at the time of the assessment included: Acidosis, Hypertension, Malnutrition, Depression, Chronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure clean and trimmed fingernails for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), Resident #13. The findings included: Record review revealed Resident #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and moved to her current room on 08/14/21. Review of the current Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/12/23, documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 01, on a 0 to 15 scale, indicating the resident was severely cognitively impaired. This same MDS documented the resident needed substantial to maximum assistance for personal hygiene. The current care plans, dated 02/03/23, documented Resident #13 had an ADL (Activities of Daily Living) self-care deficit and needed assistance with all ADLs. A second care plan initiated on 02/03/23 documented the resident was resistive to care/refusing care related to dementia. Review of the recent progress notes for the past 30 days lacked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe and secure bedrail which resulted in an injury for 1 of 2 sampled residents reviewed for siderails, Resident #151, which included failure to: a. Identify the hazard and risk; b. Evaluate and analyze the hazard(s) and risk(s) after an incident occurred; and c. Implement interventions after the incident occurred. The findings included: Review of Resident #151's admission readmission Nursing Evaluation, dated 11/17/23, documented the following information related to the resident's Side Rail Evaluation: The resident is cognitively intact. The resident is independent for transfers/bed mobility. It is determined that the resident needs side rails as an enabler to promote independence and no other appropriate alternative exists. Resident has bilateral side rails on their bed. The resident utilizes a ¼ side rail. Review of Resident #151's 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed on 11/24/23, assessed this resident as having a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) Score of 04 out of 15,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-21 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide tube feedings in accordance with physician's orders, and failed to ensure weights were monitored as ordered for 1 of 2 sampled residents reviewed for tube feeding, Resident #89. The findings included: Record review revealed Resident #89 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included malnutrition. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, reference date 10/31/23, indicated Resident #89 had cognition impairment, and she was rarely / never understood. Review of physician order dated 10/26/23 indicated the facility was to weigh Resident (#89) daily times 3, then weekly times 4, and then monthly. It also documented to enter the weights in the weights and vitals section in the computer system. Additional review of physician order, dated 11/06/23, revealed, an order for enteral feeding two times a day with Jevity 1.2 at 70ml/hour for 20 hours. Review of care plans with revision date 11/01/23 indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to timely manage pain for 1 of 3 sampled residents reviewed for pain, as evidence by Nursing staff failed to properly assess for the effectiveness of as needed pain medication, failed to notify the physician of the ineffective pain medication, and failed to timely update the change in frequency of pain medication once received from the physician for Resident #152. The findings included: Review of the policy, titled, Pain Evaluation and Management, revised 2/2023, documented, Guideline: Pain Management is defined as the process of alleviating the resident's pain based on his or her clinical condition and established treatment goals. Pain management is a multidisciplinary care process that includes the following: . g. Monitoring for the effectiveness of interventions. Acute pain should be evaluated 30 to 60 minutes after the onset and re-evaluated as indicated until relief is obtained. Monitoring and Modifying Approaches: . Monitor the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-21 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and policy review, the facility failed to ensure competent nurse staffing related to medication administration for 2 of 6 sampled residents observed, as evidenced by: Staff C, Registered Nurse (RN)/B Wing Unit Manager, failed to ensure the proper dose of insulin for Resident #57; and Staff B, RN, failed to properly administer medications via enteral (tube) for Resident #80. The findings included: 1. A medication pass observation was made on 12/20/23 at 5:39 PM with Staff C, Registered Nurse (RN), for Resident #57. The RN stated she needed to check the resident's blood sugar level and administer some medications. The RN obtained the Lantus insulin pen from the cart, placed the pen on a clean disposable tray, and stated, If his blood sugar is OK, he will get 20 units. The RN obtained the items to check the resident's blood sugar, and took those items and the insulin pen into the resident's room. After obtaining the blood sugar for Resident #57, the RN took the Lantus…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate documentation between the medication administration records (MARs) and the medication monitoring control record for 2 of 4 sampled residents, Resident #152 and #23. The findings included: 1. On 12/21/23 at 11:51 AM during the medication storage review process at Unit A2, two residents records were selected for review. Resident #152 had an order of Alprazolam 1 mg 1 tablet by mouth every 8 hours as needed. The medication monitoring control record was compared against the December 2023 MARs. There was a discrepancy in between the records. It was revealed that the Alprazolam was documented for removal in the medication monitoring control record on the following days 12/18 at 5:25, 12/18 1:40, and 12/18 at 9:55, however the removal was not recorded in the December MARs. 2. Resident #23 had an order of Tramadol 50 mg 1 tablet by mouth every 8 hours as needed. The medication monitoring control record was compared against the December 2023 MARs. There was a discrepancy in between the records. It was revealed that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-21 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that nursing staff administered insulin as per routine physician's orders and as per physician orders with set parameters for 1 of 5 sampled residents, Resident #45. The findings included: Resident #45 was initially admitted on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Bipolar Disorder and Diabetes Mellitus (DM), Type II. Resident #45's initial Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed on 09/18/23 shows the resident having a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 of 15, indicating cognition was intact. During the look-back period for the MDS, it was documented that Resident #45 received insulin injections for 6 of the days. Review of the physician medication orders for Resident #45 showed orders as follows: a. Novolog Injection Solution Inject as per sliding scale: if 120 - 140 = 2 units; 141 - 160 = 4 units; 161 - 180 = 6 units; 181 - 300 = 8 units; 301 - 350 = 10 units; 351 - 400 = 12 units greater…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly store medications during for 1 of 6 sampled residents observed during the medication pass observation, Resident #57; and failed to properly store the extra supply of OTC (over the counter) medications in the Central Supply storage room. The facility had independently ambulatory residents in the facility at the time of the survey. The findings included: 1. A medication pass observation was made on 12/20/23 at 5:39 PM with Staff C, Registered Nurse (RN)/B Wing Unit Manager, for Resident #57. The RN stated she needed to check the resident's blood sugar level and administer some medications. The RN obtained the Lantus insulin pen from the cart, placed the pen on a clean disposable tray, and stated, If his blood sugar is OK, he will get 20 units. The RN obtained the items to check the resident's blood sugar, and took those items and the insulin pen into the resident's room. After administration of the insulin, the RN took the insulin pen and placed it on top of the medication cart. Photographic Evidence…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure laboratory services for 1 of 7 sampled residents, Resident #37. The findings included: Review of the record revealed Resident #37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and moved to her current on 02/23/22. Review of the current Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 0, on a 0 to 15 scaled, indicating the resident was severely cognitively impaired. This MDS also lacked any documented behaviors. Review of the physician orders revealed an HbA1C (blood level to determine the overall blood sugar control) was to be drawn on 09/14/23 and then every three months thereafter. The record lacked any results for 09/14/23 or 12/14/23. Further review of the orders revealed a comprehensive metabolic panel (CMP/a variety of laboratory values) was to be drawn on 09/14/23 and then every six months thereafter. The record lacked the results for the 09/14/23 CMP. During a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-21 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolatedRegularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the inspection of bed mattresses and bedrails to identify potential hazards, for 2 of 2 sampled residents reviewed for bedrails, Residents #20 and #151. The findings included: The facility's policy, 'Proper Use of Side Rails, revised December 2016, documented in the section titled 'General Guidance': 3. An assessment will be made to determine the resident's symptoms, risk of entrapment and reason for using side rails. When used for mobility or transfer, an assessment will include a review of the resident's: a. Bed mobility c. Risk of entrapment from the use of side rails; and d. That the bed's dimensions are appropriate for the resident's size and weight. 9. Consent for side rail use will be obtained from the resident or legal representative, after presenting a potential benefits and risks. 13. when side rail usage is appropriate, the facility will assess the space between the mattress and side rails to reduce the risk of entrapment (the amount of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-31 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on administrative and clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the clinical records accurately documented physicians orders for residents' treatment and services; and failed to accurately document the performance and administration of medications, treatment and services. This failure affected 2 of 3 sampled residents' clinical records reviewed, Residents #1 and #4. The findings included: 1. Review of the clinical record for Resident #1 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Chronic Systolic Congested Heart Failure and Ischemic Cardiomyopathy. Further review of the clinical record revealed that the staff failed to consistently document that they administered the prescribed medication by placing their initials in the appropriate boxes and failed to ensure they had a physician prescription for administered treatments and transfers as follows: a. Review of the physician orders revealed that the physician prescribed for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-08-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure required interdisciplinary team (IDT) members participation in care planning process for 12 of 22 sampled residents reviewed for care plan, Residents #73, #94, #47, #41, #36, #5, #27, #78, #54, #35, #45, and #3. The findings included: 1. Record review for Resident #27 revealed the quarterly care plan review was held on 06/10/22 with interdisciplinary team (IDT) participation that included: the minimum data set coordinator (MDS), activity staff, license practical nurse (LPN), therapy and physician. There was no evidence of certified nursing assistance (CNA) and Dietitian participation in this care plan review. 2. Record review for Resident #35 revealed the quarterly care plan review was held on 04/22/22 with IDT participation that included: MDS, LPN, therapy, social services and physician. There was no evidence of CNA and Dietitian participation in this care plan review. 3. Record review for Resident #47 revealed the admission care plan review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to follow standards of practice for infection control practices related to PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) use and glucometer disinfecting. This has the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The census at the time of the survey was 99 residents. The findings included: Review of the policy COVID-19 (Florida) Guidance and Initiatives, revised 06/21/22, documented in part, Personal Protective Equipment and Hand Hygiene . 3. Transmission Based Precautions will be implemented and signage instructing the appropriate use of PPE's will be posted outside the resident's door. 5. As per CDC's protocol, for a resident with known or suspected COVID-19: employees providing care wear gloves, isolation gown, eye protection and an N95 or high-level respirator if available. A facemask is an acceptable alternative if an N95 or higher-level respirator is not available. 6. Hand Hygiene should be performed for at least 20 seconds with soap and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-08-25 · tag F0886 — failed to test for COVID-19 as required — patternPerform COVID19 testing on residents and staff.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure COVID-19 testing was completed as per manufacturer's instructions for 6 of 6 observed staff tests (Staff N, Staff O, Staff P, Staff Q, Staff R, and Staff S); and for 4 of 4 observed sampled residents (Residents #210, #48, #78, and #102). Upon entrance to the facility on [DATE], there were eleven (11) COVID-19 positive residents. After completion of resident testing on 08/22/22, there were eighteen (18) COVID-19 positive residents. After resident testing on 08/24/22, there were an additional six positive residents (25 positive residents). The nursing staff were not following manufacturer's instructions for COVID-19 testing, thus the actual number of COVID-19 positive residents and or staff may have been more. The findings included: Review of the manufacturer's instructions for the [NAME] BinaxNOW COVID-19 Antigen test documented, in part, the following, Sample Test Procedure: 1. Hold Extraction Reagent bottle vertically. Hovering 1/2 inch above the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-25 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide enablers per resident request for 1 of 3 sampled resident's reviewed for choices, Resident #78. The findings included: Review of Resident #78's medical records revealed an admission to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Enterocolitis due to Clostridium Difficile, Hypertension, Atrial Fibrillation, Congestive Heart Failure, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Type II Diabetes Mellitus, Anxiety, Depression, Abnormalities of Gait and Mobility, Generalized Muscle Weakness, and Pressure Ulcer of Sacral, Left lower Back and Left Heel. Review of the MDS (Minimum Data Set) 5 day, dated 07/20/22, documented thr resident had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of a 15, indicating intact cognition. Her Functional Status documented total dependence of one person for bed mobility, toileting, and bathing. She required extensive assistance of two person for transfers, dressing and hygiene. She had impairment to her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean comfortable homelike environment for the residents. The findings included: During tour of the facility, including resident rooms on 08/22/22 and through 08/25/22, and a secondary tour completed on 08/24/22 at 8:21 AM, with the Director of Maintenance & Housekeeping, and the Administrator, the following concerns were noted, observed, and acknowledged during tour: 1. 100 unit: a. room [ROOM NUMBER]A - Floors were dirty with debris. There were clothes piled up in the corner of the room. The resident stated he cannot get anyone to hang his clothes up for him. During the secondary tour on 08/24/22 (Thursday), two dead cockroaches were observed in the room, with one under the bed along with a dirty razor, which has been there since Monday. b. room [ROOM NUMBER]A - There was clothes piled next to bed. A sampled resident complained that staff say they don't have time to put away her clothes. Her closet was observed behind the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-25 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure accuracy of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 2 of 22 sampled residents, as evidenced by Resident #94 was inaccurately coded as having wandering behaviors and an indwelling urinary catheter; and Resident #207 was admitted to the facility and continued to utilize oxygen, while the MDS lacked any documentation of the oxygen use. The findings included: 1. Review of the record revealed Resident #94 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a readmission on [DATE]. Review of the order summary report, that included discontinued orders, lacked any evidence of an indwelling urinary catheter (Foley). Review of the current Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/01/22, documented Resident #94 had an indwelling urinary catheter. Observation of Resident #94 on both 08/23/22 at 2:51 PM and on 08/24/22 at 9:13 AM lacked any noted urinary catheter appliance. During an interview on 08/25/22 at 10:31 AM, the A Hall Unit Manager was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-25 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure care and services for Foley catheter for 1 of 2 residents, Resident #206, reviewed for indwelling catheters. The findings included: A review of the Policy and Procedures for 'Urinary Catheter Care', documented under general guidelines 1. Following aseptic insertion of the urinary catheter, maintain a closed drainage system. 2. If breaks in aseptic technique, disconnection, or leakage occur, replace the catheter and collecting system using aseptic technique and sterile equipment. Review of Resident#206's records revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Retention of Urine, Chronic Kidney Disease, Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia with Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms and Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following a Cerebral Infarction. A review of the Physician's Orders revealed that there was no physician order for a Foley catheter. A review of the Nursing admission Assessment on 08/16/22 documented…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-25 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely nutritional assessment for 2 of 4 sampled residents, Resident #27 who had a facility acquired pressure ulcer of Stage 4, and failed to ensure timely nutritional assessment for a resident who had a significant weight loss and to ensure weights were obtained, Resident #41. The findings included: 1. On 08/24/22, beginning at 12:00 PM, clinical record review started for Resident #27. There was a physician order, dated 07/28/22, for wound care treatment as follows: Stage 4 pressure of the Sacrum / cleanse with normal saline, pat dry, apply acetic acid solution, wet to moist covered with island gauze with border dressing once daily. Additional record review showed documented evidence of a nutritional assessment, dated 03/10/22. Further record review indicated a quarterly minimum date set (MDS) assessment, reference date 06/10/22. There was no documented evidence of a quarterly nutritional assessment with this quarterly MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to obtain a physician's order for oxygen and ensure proper maintenance was done for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed, Resident #207. The findings included: Review of the Policy & Procedures for Oxygen Administration documented, in part, to verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure. Review the physician's orders or facility protocol for oxygen administration. Review of Resident#207 medical records reveal resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Pulmonary Hypertension due to lung disease and Hypoxia, Heart Failure, Nonrheumatic Tricuspid Valve Insufficiency, Hypertension, Emphysema, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, and Chronic Respiratory Failure. Review of the Admission/Medicare 5-day MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 08/17/22 documents resident has a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) of 8, indicating mildly impaired cognition. Review of the physician orders revealed there was no order…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-25 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate coordination of care for 1 of 1 sampled resident, Resident #73, reviewed for dialysis care, as evidenced by the resident was scheduled for a procedure to the dialysis fistula (access) and the facility staff did not ensure NPO (nothing by mouth) status; and failed to ensure pre and post dialysis assessments were completed for Resident #73. The findings included: Review of the policy, Hemodialysis Access Care, revised September 2010, documented, in part, Care of AVFs (arteriovenous fistula for dialysis access) . 4. To prevent infection and/or clotting: . d. Check for signs of infection at the access site when performing routine care and at regular intervals. g. Check the color and temperature of the fingers, and the radial pulse of the access arm when performing routine care and at regular intervals. Review of the record revealed Resident #73 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the current…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-25 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure ordered labs were completed for 2 of 6 sampled residents reviewed, Residents #35 and #3. The findings included: 1. Clinical record review for Resident #35 revealed an admission to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Hypertension and Anemia. Additional record review evidenced a care plan dated 08/05/22 that indicated Resident #35 had Anemia, and interventions included: obtain and monitor lab / diagnostic work as ordered. Report results to MD [medical doctor] and follow up as indicated. Further record review indicated a physician order, dated 08/02/22, for a laboratory test of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) which is a blood test that measures how much blood your kidneys filter each minute. Resident #35's record lacked evidence of this lab test result. Review of the August 2022 medication and treatment administration records lacked documentation of this ordered lab. The August 2022 lab requisition book lacked evidence of this…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to ASTON HEALTH — 38 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.1 | ≈ chain avg |
The other 37 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.7★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LP CARE HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 05/07/2018 |
| CITADEL CARE GROUP LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 05/07/2018 |
| GUTMAN, SAMUEL | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 05/07/2018 |
| BANNISTER, GERRI | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 08/12/2025 |
| CULBERTH, BRITTNEY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 12/11/2022 |
| JOHNSON, DES | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/13/2025 |
| WILDES, DONNA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/28/2025 |
| ZIMMER, SUZAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/27/2018 |
| ASTON HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2022 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $2.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 22% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in FL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 105382. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.