Creekside Health And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

40.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 212 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 51.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 80 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 52% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 178 beds and averages 138.6 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 39 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.68 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.43 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.31 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.41 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.79 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.49 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-02-05 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from misappropriation of property for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed.The findings included:Review of the facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, Misappropriation, Mistreatment and Injury of Unknown Origin (ANEMMI), revision date 3/2025 revealed Misappropriation of resident property means the deliberate misplacement, exploitation, or wrongful, temporary, or permanent use of a resident's belongings or money without the resident's consent.On 2/3/26 at 10:30 a.m., the Regional Director of Operations provided incident investigations for November 2025 which included an investigation into an allegation of misappropriation of resident's property. Review of the facility provided investigations revealed that on 11/13/25, the facility initiated an investigation into an allegation of unauthorized transfer of money from Resident #1's bank account to Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) Staff A's money transfer application. The facility's investigation included documentation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-05 · tag F0603 — failed to not confine residents against their will — isolated
  Protect each resident from separation (from other residents, his/her room, or confinement to his/her room).
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to protect the right to be free from involuntary seclusion for 1 (Resident #2) or 4 residents reviewed.The findings included:Review of the facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, Misappropriation, Mistreatment and Injury of Unknown Origin (ANEMMI), revision date 3/2025 indicated the resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property, mistreatment and exploitation as defined in this subpart. This includes but is not limited to freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion and any physical or chemical restraint not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms. Abuse is defined at 483.5 as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment resulting in physical harm, pain or mental anguish.On 2/4/26 at 11:39 a.m., Resident #2 was observed in the secured memory care unit. Resident #2 said, They moved me back here against my will. He said they taped the door up saying do not enter and he was locked…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, review of facility policy, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services for personal hygiene and incontinent care for 2 (Resident #100 and #2) of 3 residents reviewed for activities of daily living.The findings included:Review of the facility's policy, Standards and Guidelines: ADL Care and Services, initiated 4/2020 (revised 1/24) revealed, Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADL's) independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene . Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently, with the consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care, including appropriate support and assistance with including but not limited to:Hygiene (bathing/showers, dressing, grooming and oral care).Elimination (toileting).The resident has the right to refuse any and all ADL care.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to follow proper sanitation and cleaning practices in the kitchen to prevent the outbreak of foodborne illness. The findings included: On 2/17/25 at 9:20 a.m., an initial tour of the kitchen was completed with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM). The ice machine was observed first. It had a monthly maintenance check sheet attached to the front. The last month signed on the maintenance log for the ice machine was checked by maintenance was August of 2024. Photographic evidence obtained In an interview the CDM said to her knowledge no one had checked it since she had been she had been employed at the facility, approximately three months. Dietary Aide Staff E was observed using the 3-compartment sink. The third sink was empty. A metal bin with a sanitizing solution was observed in the third sink. Dietary Aide Staff E was observed washing and rinsing a pan. Staff E dunked the pan and left it floating on the sanitizing solution in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, residents and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment for 9 (Rooms #238, #240, #243, Residents #75's room, #103's room, #109's room, and #81's room)of 22 residents' rooms observed, and 2 (Unit 2A and 2B) of 2 shower rooms observed. The findings included: On 2/17/25 at 9:46 a.m., during the initial tour the following observations were made: 1. room [ROOM NUMBER]: A shampoo bottle, and a spray bottle were stored on the floor next to bed B. 15 unrefrigerated yogurts and a carton of milk were stored on the air-conditioning unit and the windowsill. The shared bathroom had a pile of soiled towels on the floor. Unlabeled dishes and washbasins were stored on a shelf above the toilet. An unlabeled urine measuring container was stored on the toilet tank. Photographic evidence obtained. 2. Resident #108's room: Resident #108 was observed in bed. Her urinary catheter drainage bag was on the floor. 3. room [ROOM NUMBER] A: The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 8 (Residents #109, #346, #196, #108, #138, #103, #9, and #65) of 9 residents dependent upon staff for care received the necessary care and assistance for activities of daily living. The findings included: 1. Review of the Clinical Record Review for Resident #109 revealed an Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with a target date of 3/14/24. The assessment noted the resident felt it was very important to choose a shower, bed bath, tub bath or sponge bath. The Quarterly MDS with a target date of 1/2/25 revealed Resident #109's cognitive skills for daily decision making was intact with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15. Resident #109 required set-up or clean-up assistance with showers or bathing and supervision or touching assistance to get in and out of a tub/shower. On 2/17/25 at 10:00 a.m., in an interview Resident #109 stated, Staff do not offer to shower me and no, I did not receive my shower yesterday.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-02-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure 2 (Residents #6 and #123) of 3 sampled residents received care in accordance with the established plan of care. The findings included: 1. Review of Resident #6's clinical record revealed an admission date of 12/31/24. Diagnoses included chronic diastolic congestive heart failure, a condition in which the heart doesn't pump blood as well as it should. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with a target date of 1/7/25 revealed Resident #6's cognition was intact with a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15. Review of the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for February 2025 revealed a physician's order dated 1/30/25 for TED hose (compression stockings) on during the day and off at night to Bilateral Lower Extremities (BLE), every day and evening for BLE edema (swelling caused by excess fluid buildup in tissues) and orthostatic hypotension (sudden drop in blood pressure upon standing up). On 2/17/25 at 3:55 p.m., Resident #6 was observed sitting in a wheelchair. Observation of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-02-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record reviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure licensed nurses followed infection prevention practices during blood glucose monitoring for 2 (Residents #447 and #131) of 2 residents observed. The facility failed to ensure urinary catheter drainage bags were stored in a safe and sanitary manner for 2 (Residents #103 and #75) of 2 residents observed with urinary catheter drainage bags stored on the floor. The findings included: 1. Review of the policy for Hand Hygiene and Infection Control last revised on 6/2023 revealed that the facility shall require facility personnel use accepted hand hygiene after each direct resident contact for which hand hygiene is indicated. Situations that require hand hygiene include but are not limited to: Before and after performing any invasive procedure (e.g. fingerstick blood sampling) and after removing gloves or aprons. On 2/19/25 at 11:30 a.m.,, Registered Nurse (RN) Staff D was observed doing a fingerstick to measure Resident #447's blood glucose. RN Staff D donned a pair of gloves that he removed from his…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-02-20 · tag F0887 — pattern
  Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that resident or resident representative had the opportunity to accept or refuse a COVID-19 vaccine and that the resident's medical record includes documentation that the resident or resident representative were provided education regarding the benefits and potential risks associated with COVID-19 vaccine, documentation of COVID-19 vaccine administered to the resident; or documentation the resident did not receive the COVID-19 vaccine due to medical contraindications or refusal for 5 (Residents #97, #67, #133, #104, #108 ) of 5 residents reviewed for vaccinations. The findings included: Facility policy for Infection Control COVID 19 Revised 6/24/24 indicated under section titled Vaccination 1. COVID 19 Vaccines are offered to residents and staff in accordance with CDC (Centers for Disease Control) guidance Stay Up to Date with COVID-19 Vaccines. CDC guidance Stay Up to Date with COVID-19 Vaccines indicates: It is especially important to get your 2024-2025 COVID-19 vaccine if you are ages 65 and older, are at high…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-20 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to support the resident's right to voice a grievance without fear of discrimination or reprisal for 1(Resident #103) of 2 residents reviewed for grievances. The findings included: The facility policy Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, Misappropriation, Mistreatment and Injury of Unknown Origin issued 8/2022, defined Mental abuse: the use of verbal or nonverbal conduct which causes or has the potential to cause the resident to experience humiliation, intimidation, fear, shame. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #103 had a readmission date of 8/27/24 with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis, anxiety and major depressive disorder. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with a target date of 2/2/25. The MDS noted the resident's cognitive skills for daily decision making were intact with a BIMS score of 15. Resident #103 had an indwelling urinary catheter and was always incontinent of stool. Resident #103 was dependent on staff for toileting and required substantial/maximal assistance to shower/bathe self. On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ASTON HEALTH — 38 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $504K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL