Seaside Health And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Met the expected recovery: 48.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 72 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 20% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 192 beds and averages 157.6 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 34 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.38 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.33 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.13 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.11 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.49 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.38 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 65% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

• Potential for harm · E2026-05-14 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
  Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective past control program to ensure that the facility was free of pests. This failure affected the facility's kitchen, room [ROOM NUMBER] and the adjoining hallway. The findings include: 1.On 5/11/2026 at 10:50 AM, during the initial kitchen tour, two live insects were observed crawling behind the dishwasher machine near the water drainage pipe. (Photographic evidence obtained) On 5/13/2026 at 11:32 AM, during a follow-up tour of the kitchen, food items were being delivered by the vendor. The facility's back door remained open during the delivery. There was no device in place to help keep pests and flying insects from entering through the doorway into the kitchen. Flies and other flying insects were observed coming in through the open doors. On 5/13/2026 at 11:36 AM, holes were observed in the walls and ceiling near the food serving station. Holes were observed over the frame of the back door. Several potential pest…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, record review and a review of the facility's policies and procedures, the facility failed to ensure each resident a dignified experience and self-determination, by failing to ensure adequate communication interventions were available for one (Resident #38) of 30 residents whose care plans were reviewed. This failure contributed to Resident #38's expression of feeling ignored and forgotten by staff. The findings include:On 05/11/2026 at 12:37 PM, an observation of Resident #38's room revealed no communication board, dry erase board, iPad/tablet, or other communication aid present, despite the resident exhibiting difficulty verbally communicating.On 05/11/2026 at 12:37 PM, an interview with Resident #38 revealed he felt staff often could not understand him, making it difficult to communicate his needs. He further stated he felt ignored and forgotten by staff.On 05/13/2026 at 11:30 AM, a follow-up interview with Resident #38 revealed that in the past, he used an iPad tablet to communicate his needs with staff. When he was asked if he still had access…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, interview and a review of the facility's policies and procedures, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who was fed by enteral means received appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications of enteral feeding by failing to ensure that enteral nutrition was administered in accordance with the physician's orders for one (Resident #123) of two residents reviewed for enteral nutrition services from a total of three residents receiving enteral nutrition. Resident #123 was ordered an enteral nutritional formula to be administered at 65 ml per hour and instead was receiving her enteral nutrition at 75 ml per hour. This increases the risk of gastrointestinal discomfort and stomach-emptying delays, which could lead to aspiration pneumonia.The findings include:On 5/12/2026 at 12:04 PM, an observation of Resident #123 revealed that her enteral nutrition bag hanging at bedside was labeled for administration at 75 milliliters (mL) per hour. (Photographic evidence obtained)On 5/13/2026 at 11:25 AM, a follow-up observation of Resident #123…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, staff interview and a review of the facility's policies and procedures, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care, was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for one (Resident #145) of one resident reviewed for respiratory care from a total survey sample of 40 residents. The facility failed to obtain a physician's order for oxygen prior to its administration, and Resident #145's oxygen flow rate was inconsistent with what the physician stated in his 5/8/2026 progress note and what LPN B stated during a 5/13/2026 interview.The findings include:On 5/12/2026 at 10:09 AM, an observation was made of Resident #145 in bed wearing a nasal cannula with oxygen infusing. His oxygen concentrator was set at a flow rate of 2.5 liters per minute (LPM). (Photographic evidence obtained)On 5/13/2026 at 11:33 AM, a follow-up observation was made of Resident #145 in bed wearing his nasal cannula with oxygen infusing . His oxygen concentrator was set at a flow rate of 2.5 LPM. (Photographic evidence…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living, received necessary care and services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for one (Resident #25) of two residents reviewed for ADL care from 30 residents in the total survey sample. The findings include: On 8/19/24 at 11:44 AM, Resident #25's fingernails were observed to be long and soiled. (Photographic evidence obtained) On 8/21/24 at 3:23 PM, the resident's fingernails were observed to be long and soiled. When he was asked who usually cleaned and trimmed his fingernails, he replied, The girls take care of my nails. (Photographic evidence obtained) A review of the resident's medical record revealed diagnoses including, but not limited to, osteoarthritis, cataracts, major depressive disorder, dementia without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety. A review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/30/24, revealed a brief…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one (Resident #51) of two residents sampled for respiratory therapy review, from 30 residents in the total survey sample, received oxygen according to their physician's order. The findings include: On 8/19/24 at 11:49 AM, an observation was made of Resident #51 with her oxygen flow rate set at 1.5 liters per minute (L/min). (Photographic evidence obtained) The resident reported that she was not physically capable of adjusting the oxygen concentrator flow rate. On 8/20/24 at 9:49 AM, another observation was made of Resident #51's oxygen concentrator. The oxygen flow rate was set at 1.5 L/min. (Photographic evidence obtained) On 8/21/24 at 3:41 PM, another observation was made of Resident #51's oxygen concentrator. The oxygen flow rate was set at 1.5 L/min. (Photographic evidence obtained) A review of Resident #51's medical record revealed an admission date of 8/11/22 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
  Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to ensure that its residents had a means of directly contacting caregivers for one (Resident #13) of 30 residents in the total survey sample. The call bell must be placed in a way that makes it accessible to the resident while in their bed. The findings include: On 8/19/24 at 11:52 AM, Resident #13 was observed in bed. She was alert to her name and able to express her needs. She complained of left foot pain. She stated she informed the nurse that she was in pain. When she was asked if she knew how to get help if she needed it, she replied, Yes, I have a bell. When she was asked where her call bell was located, she tried to reach for it. It was observed to be out of her reach on the left side of the bed. (Photographic evidence obtained) On 8/21/24 at 10:39 AM, Resident #13 was observed in bed, alert and able to express pain on her left side, especially her left foot and ankle. On a pain scale of 1-10 with 10 being the highest level of pain, she described her pain as 15. She…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one (Resident #109) of two residents receiving oxygen therapy, from a total of 47 residents in the sample, was administered oxygen at the flow rate ordered by the physician. The findings include: On 8/22/2022 at 11:02 am, Resident #109 was observed lying in bed with his covers pulled to his chest and was receiving oxygen via nasal cannula. He complained that he was not receiving enough oxygen. The resident stated he should receive 3 liters per minute (L/min). The oxygen concentrator located at bedside was observed to be set at 1.5 L/min. (Photographic evidence obtained) A review of Resident #109's physician's order, dated 4/07/2022, revealed he was to receive oxygen at 2 L/min continuously every shift. On 8/23/2022 at 11:58 am, another observation of Resident #109's oxygen concentrator revealed it was set at 1.5 L/min. (Photographic evidence obtained) A medical record review revealed the resident was admitted into the facility on 4/06/2022. His diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ASTON HEALTH — 38 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 90% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 26% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL