Riverwood Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

27.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 66 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 33.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 87 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 53% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 240 beds and averages 218.0 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.36 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.38 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.07 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.10 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.46 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.43 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-01-09 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
  Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide restorative nursing therapy to ensure that a resident's abilities in activities of daily living did not diminish for two (Residents #193 and #56) of two residents reviewed for the dining restorative program, from a total of 11 residents participating in the dining restorative program, in a total survey sample of 56 residents. The 11 residents on the dining restorative program were at risk of further decline. Resident #193 suffered a significant weight loss. The findings include: 1. During the dining observation on 01/06/25 at 11:50 AM, Resident #193 was observed seated at the dining table in the Caring Way unit. She was served a mechanical soft meal on a regular plate. She consumed 25% of her meal and then scooped the remaining food from her plate onto a paper napkin that was provided with the meal tray. Resident #137, who was seated beside her, was observed eating the food from the napkin and eventually he tried to eat the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one (Resident #50) of 52 sampled residents currently residing in the facility, had access to his call light. The findings include: On 01/06/2025 at 12:05 PM, Resident #50 was observed seated in his wheelchair in his room at the foot of his bed facing the entrance to the room. He was wearing a short sleeved tee shirt, pants and non-skid socks. His right arm, wrist and fingers were contracted. He indicated he did not have any concerns. The call light was observed lying on top of the bed near the head of bed next to the pillow and out of reach of the resident. (Photographic evidence obtained) The resident was served lunch at 1:15 PM in his room, but his call light was not placed within his reach. On 01/07/2025 at 11:28 AM, Resident #50 was observed in his room. He was seated in his wheelchair at the foot of his bed. The call light was observed lying on top of the bed near the head of the bed next to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and policy and procedure review, the facility failed to honor the personal privacy of one resident (#81) reviewed for personal privacy from a total survey sample of 56 residents. The findings include: On 01/06/25 at 1:30 PM, Resident #81 was observed in her semi-private room. She had no privacy curtain. On 01/06/25 at 2:30 PM, the resident's room was observed. There was no privacy curtain in place for this resident. On 01/07/25 at 10:17 AM, the resident was observed standing inside her doorway looking out into the corridor. There was no privacy curtain in place for this resident's area of the room near the window. A record review revealed that Resident #81 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, neurological disorder due to known physiological condition with behavioral disturbance, mood disorder due to known physiological condition, and major depressive disorder. A review of athe resident's care plan revealed the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and policy and procedure review, the facility failed to implement the comprehensive care plan to meet the resident's medical needs for one (Resident #43) of one resident reviewed for transmission based precautions from a total of 56 residents in the survey sample. Specifically, isolation precautions were not followed as indicated in the care plan. The findings include: On 01/06/25 during a 12:33 PM interview, Resident #43 stated she had scabies but wanted to be out of isolation, as she was not being treated. No precautions sign or PPE (personal protective equipment) were on her door. (Photographic evidence obtained) On 01/07/25 at 9:00 AM, no precautions sign or PPE were observed on the resident's door. On 01/08/25 at 9:30 AM, no precautions sign or PPE were observed on the resident's door. A review of the resident's medical record revealed the following physician's orders: 01/08/25 - Permethrin External cream 5%, apply all over head to toe topically every night…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and policy and procedure review, the facility failed to provide fingernail care for one (Resident #47) of four residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), from a total survey sample of 56 residents. The findings include: On 01/06/25 at 11:22 AM, Resident #47 was observed resting in bed with elongated, jagged fingernails on both hands. She was asked if the staff trimmed her fingernails and she replied, One nurse cut my nails once since I've been here. She was asked if she preferred her fingernails long. She stated, I prefer them short. She was asked how her fingernails had been maintained since she was admitted . She replied, Usually when I'm doing something they just break off down to the quick and hurt. The resident was observed with tremors of both hands. (Photographic evidence obtained) A review of Resident #47's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including congestive heart failure, COPD (chronic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record reviews, and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of one (Resident #18) out of four residents observed during medication administration, from a total survey sample of 56 residents. Failure to administer medications correctly as ordered could result in side effects with serious harm to residents. The findings include: During medication administration observation on 1/7/25 at 9:40 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) M was preparing medication for Resident #18. After reviewing the medication administration record (MAR), she stated she did not have the Fluoxetine that was ordered for Resident #18. She checked the MAR and identified that the medication had been ordered from the pharmacy on 12/29/24. She stated it should arrive later today. She then stated she would place an order for it again now, just in case, which she did. A review of Resident #18's physician's orders revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record reviews, staff interviews, and policy and procedure reviews, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5% based on three errors out of 26 opportunities for error. The three errors (failure to administer medications and crushing enteric coated medication) resulted in an error rate of 11.54%. Two (Residents #18 and #51) of four residents observed during medication administration from a total survey sample of 56 residents were affected. Failure to administer medications correctly as ordered could result in side effects with serious harm to residents. The findings include: 1. During medication administration observation on 1/7/25 at 9:40 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) M was preparing the medication for Resident #18. After reviewing the medication administration record (MAR), she stated she did not have the Fluoxetine that was ordered for Resident #18. She checked the MAR and identified that the medication had been ordered from the pharmacy on 12/29/24. She stated it should arrive later today. She then stated she would place an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
  Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and policy and procedure review, the facility failed to assist residents in obtaining routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for one (Resident #84) of two residents reviewed for dental care, from a total survey sample of 56 residents. The findings include: On 01/06/25 at 11:59 AM, Resident #84 was observed to be pleasantly confused. Even standing several feet away from her, she had noticeably foul-smelling breath. On 01/07/25 at 10:30 AM, Resident #84 was observed sitting up in a recliner in her room. Even standing several feet away from her, she had noticeably foul-smelling breath. On 01/07/25 at 3:30 PM, Resident #84 was observed and continued to have noticeably foul smelling breath. On 01/08/25 at 11:23 AM, a record review conducted for Resident #84 revealed an admission date of 12/19/2020 and diagnoses including dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), cognitive/communication deficit, and GERD (gastroesophageal reflux disease). A review of the resident's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that residents unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs), received necessary care and services to maintain proper grooming and personal hygiene, by failing to provide nail care for two (Residents #8 and #11) of four residents reviewed for ADLs, from a total sample of 16 residents. The findings include: 1. During an interview with Resident #8 on 2/12/24 at 10:10 AM, his left hand was observed to be contracted around a washcloth. He explained that without the washcloth, his fingernails would dig into his palm. The resident's fingernails on both hands were soiled with dark brown substance resembling feces around the cuticles and under each nail. When asked if he was receiving any assistance with handwashing or nail care, he replied, No, I am not. A record review for Resident #8 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses of medically complex…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan by failing to ensure wound care was provided as ordered for two (Residents #2 and #3) of two residents reviewed for wound care, from a total sample of 16 residents. The finding include: 1. On 2/12/24 at 10:40 AM, Resident #2 was observed lying in bed on his left side. His eyes were closed and did not answer to his name being called, resp 16/minute. His right foot was observed to be wrapped in gauze and dated 2/10/24. The bottom of his right foot which was observed wrapped in gauze, which was colored, and dirt was on both the exposed foot (heel) and the gauze. A record review for Resident #2 revealed an admission date of 12/5/23, with diagnoses of congestive heart failure, insomnia, unspecified psychosis, dementia, major depressive disorder, mixed anxiety disorder. A review of 5-day…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to practice proper infection control measures by 1) failing to wear required personal protective equipment (PPE) for one (Resident #12) of one resident reviewed for transmission base precautions, and 2) failing to prevent the potential development and transmission of infection by not following infection prevention techniques during a wound care dressing change for one (Resident #2) of one resident observed during wound care, from a total sample of 16 residents. The findings include: 1. On 2/12/24 at 11:44 AM, Employee D, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was observed entering Resident #12's room without donning personal protective equipment (PPE). The door for Resident #12's room was observed to contain a PPE hanger with pockets that were observed to contain a box of gloves, a package of disposable blue gowns, N95 face masks, and face shields and a sign stating, Contact Precautions. The sign was observed to say: Put on gloves before room entry. Discard gloves before room exit. Put gown…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$34,778 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $34,778 — penalty dated 2025-01-09

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ASTON HEALTH — 38 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $4.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 29% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL