Vero Beach Care Center
1310 37th St, Vero Beach, FL 32960 · For profit - Corporation · 159 certified beds · (772) 569-5107 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565, F0567)
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (53) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- about 18% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
- its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 4.6% | 8.7% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.9% | 5.5% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.2% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.7% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 3.6% | 4.6% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.2% | 2.5% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 5.5% | 9.5% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 3.1% | 14.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 99.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.7% | 4.5% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 22.9% | 10.5% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 10.5% | 8.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.2% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 94.3% | 94.7% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 28.7% | 26.1% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 10.0% | 9.1% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.75 | 2.13 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.55 | 1.15 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
50.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 168 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 46.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 124 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.38 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 64% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 39% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 50.0%CMS range 43.7–57.6 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.6%CMS range 6.7–12.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 46.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 49.2% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 31.4% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 87.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 98.7% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 98.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.1%CMS range 4.3–11.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.26 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 159 beds and averages 152.0 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.43 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.27 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.11 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.14 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.55 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.32 to 0.14 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
53 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 41 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-07-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care related to incontinence care, oral and personal hygiene, and personal grooming for 5 of 9 sampled residents, Residents #228, #6, #106, #16, #111. This failure in ADL assistance resulted in psychosocial harm for Resident #228. The findings included: 1. Review of clinical record revealed Resident #228 had been a previous resident who had been discharged home on [DATE] but had been re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] due to the inability to care for himself at home. Resident #228 had diagnoses that included: Idiopathic Peripheral Autonomic Neuropathy, Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD), Hypertensive Heart Disease without Heart Failure, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Hyperlipidemia, Type-2 Diabetes with Circulatory Complications, Absence of Right Leg above the Knee, Osteomyelitis, Muscle Weakness, and Dysphasia. The Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed on 06/12/23 documented…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-07-13 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing to ensure care and services to meet the needs of bathing and showering for 2 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #22 and #100); to provide incontinence care, oral and personal hygiene, and grooming for 5 of 32 sampled residents (Residents #6, #16, #106, #111, and #228); and to follow dietary recommendations and orders for obtaining weights for 3 of 5 sampled residents (Residents #111, #120, and #123). Interviews from random residents, families, and staff revealed voiced concerns of a lack of staff. Review of current residents with skin impairments revealed 7 of 9 current pressure injuries were facility acquired (Residents #33, #72, #51, #20, #64, #10, and #76). The facility utilized managers to supplement Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) assignments on 2 of 13 days reviewed. The findings included: 1. Residents #22 and #100 voiced concerns with a lack of staff and indicated they were not being provided baths and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-20 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and clinical and administrative record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 8 sampled residents, Resident #5, was assessed by the interdisciplinary team and established a plan of care for self-administration of medication before the resident participated in the practice. The findings included: An observation was conducted on 05/19/25 at 10:50 AM with Resident #5. Upon speaking with the resident, the surveyor noticed that there were approximately 10 bottles of pills and liquid supplements neatly stored on the resident's night stand. The bottles were noted to be open. Photographic Evidence Obtained. The following supplements were stored on the night stand: 1. Two (2) bottles of 32 ounces of MCT oil weight management 2. Two (2) bottles of Nugenix Thermo X 3. One (1) bottle of weight loss probiotics 4. One (1) bottle of Veggies capsule 5. One (1) bottle of Testerone Booster 6. One (1) bottle of Fruit Dietary Supplement 7. One (1) bottle of Nugenix Ultimate Testerone Booster An…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-20 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical and administrative record review, the facility failed to honor the resident's bath preference and ensure the resident consistently received his bath preference for 1 of 8 sampled resident, Resident #4. The findings included: During the observational tour of the facility on 05/19/25 at 11:30 AM, the surveyor approached Resident #4, who was sitting in his wheelchair in front of his room. The resident voiced his dissatisfaction that they forget about us in room [room number]. The housekeeping aide was observed in the room at this time mopping the floor. The resident stated, I haven't got my medications yet and has gone about 3 weeks without a shower. They don't ever change my linen. I told them my toilet is leaking, and they don't do anything about it. The resident stated that they will wash him in his private area, but he wants a shower. He stated also that he has said he prefers to wear the pull up type of incontinent briefs but some of the aides keep putting the ones with the tabs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-20 · tag F0675 — failed to support quality of life — isolatedHonor each resident's preferences, choices, values and beliefs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical and administrative record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the residents received the necessary care and services for skin assessments and timely medication administration, as evidenced by the facility's consistent failure to respond in a timely manner fo residents who developed new skin issues and failed to ensure that residents received their prescribed medications in a timely manner, for 3 of 8 sampled residents, Residents # 1, # 4 and # 6. The findings included: 1. Record review revealed Resident #1 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnosis which includes, Diabetes Mellitus, Cerebrovascular disease, Chronic Kidney disease, Stage 3, Essential Hypertension, and Blind Left eye. Review of the resident's plan of care identified a concern initiated on 02/24/25, The resident has a Skin Impairment: eczema. Interventions included: Encourage and assist resident to Off Load Heels as ordered Monitor the Resident's changes in skin condition, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure all medications and/or supplements were not stored at the residents' bedside but were safely secured in locked compartments for 1 of 8 sampled residents, Resident #5. The findings included: An interview was conducted on 05/19/25 at 10:50 AM with Resident #5. Upon speaking with the resident, the surveyor observed there were approximately 10 bottles of pills and liquid supplements neatly stored unsecured on top of the resident's bedside night stand. Photographic Evidence Obtained. The following supplemental pills were stored on the night stand and clearly visible upon entering the resident's side of the room: 1. Two (2) bottles of 32 ounces of MCT oil weight management 2. Two (2) bottles of Nugenix Thermo X - 60 capsules bottles 3. One (1) bottle of weight loss probiotics 4. One (1) bottle of Veggies capsule 5. One (1) bottle of Testerone Booster 6. One (1) bottle of Fruit Dietary Supplement 7. One (1) bottle of Nugenix Ultimate Testerone Booster. An interview was conducted with the resident at this time revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide necessary care and services to prevent, identify and properly assess wounds, for 1 of 2 sampled residents reviewed for wounds (Resident #3), as evidenced by the facility failed to identify the blister or subsequent open wound to the resident's right foot, prior to surveyor intervention; the wound care nurse failed to properly assess the wound, documenting erroneous measurements and staff nurses failed to capture the wound during skin check assessment completed on 02/11/25, the day prior to the surveyor's observation. The findings included: Observation of wound care conducted on 02/12/25 at 10:20 AM revealed the Wound Care Nurse (WCN) performed wound care for Resident #3's left foot. At the end of the treatment, the surveyor asked the reason why the offloading boot was only applied to the left leg, as the resident was severely contracted on both legs. The WCN responded that the resident prefers to lay on the left side and that is where the wound is located, so an offloading boot is not necessary to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide necessary care and services to prevent and promote healing of pressure ulcers, for 2 of 2 sampled residents reviewed for pressure wounds, Resident #3 and Resident #1. The findings included: Review of the policy, titled, Wound Care and Treatment, revised 01/2024, documented, in part: Standard: The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the care of wounds to promote healing. Guideline: Only staff trained to complete physician orders will complete wound care and treatments as prescribed. Procedure: Preparation 1. Verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure . 4. Assess residents pain level as needed. Equipment and Supplies: The following equipment and supplies will be necessary when performing this procedure . 12. Assess residents tolerance of wound care throughout the procedure. 16. Reposition the bed covers. Make the resident comfortable. Use supportive devices as instructed. Documentation: The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide maintenance and housekeeping services to maintain a clean, comfortable and homelike environment on 4 of 5 units and in common areas. The findings included: During an environmental tour of the facility on 09/12/24 at 4:25 PM with the Maintenance Director, the following was observed: a. In room [ROOM NUMBER], there were two picture hanging hooks protruding from the wall with sharp points on them by the head of the bed. b. In room [ROOM NUMBER], there was an accumulation of residue on the exterior of the wall mounted air conditioning unit and an accumulation of debris inside of the vents of the unit. c. In room [ROOM NUMBER], there were multiple holes in the wall from where the chair rail once was. d. In room [ROOM NUMBER], the wall by the wall mounted air conditioning unit was in disrepair. e. In room [ROOM NUMBER], the bed frame was in disrepair and showed signs of wear. f. In room [ROOM NUMBER], there was residue and debris on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-13 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing as evidence by falls and a consistent stale urine odor on 1 of 5 units ([NAME]); lack of ADL care for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #44); lack of Hospice coordination for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #25 and #87); and voiced complaints by residents, families, staff, and resident council. The findings included: 1) Resident #128, who was admitted to the facility on [DATE], sustained eleven falls while residing on the [NAME] unit. Review of these falls lacked evidence the facility followed their fall prevention policy. (Refer to F689 for details). Review of the fall log from 07/01/24 through the survey date of 09/13/24 revealed the facility had 38 falls, 10 of which were on the [NAME] unit. Upon entering the [NAME] unit on all five days of the survey (09/09/24 - 09/13/24) a constant urine odor was noted throughout. Although a specific resident was not identified during the survey, the odors remained. 2)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide food prepared, stored and served in a sanitary manner and in accordance with professional standards for food safety. The findings included: 1). During the initial kitchen tour, on 09/09/24 at 8:43 AM, accompanied by the Dietary Manager, the following were noted: a. The hand washing sink and the baseboard by the food assembly area were not secured to the wall. b. Cleaned and sanitized utensils (knives, forks and spoons) were not inverted while being stored and were stored directly underneath the hand washing sink. c. The floor paint was noted to be peeling throughout the kitchen. d. There was an accumulation of debris and residue on blade and mechanism of the counter mounted can opener. e. The shelving underneath the hot holding unit was damaged and rusted. f. There was an accumulation of dust on the air conditioning vents in the ceiling throughout the kitchen. g. The oven mitts were noted to be torn and uncleanable. h. In the walk in cooler, there were packages of raw beef stored directly over a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to follow infection control standards to ensure appropriate treatment for a rash outbreak on 1 of 5 units ([NAME] Unit) affecting sampled Residents #25, #30, #32, #33, #40, #42, #56, #73, #87, #93, #99, #109, #123, and #133; failed to report a rash outbreak to the Florida Department of Health (DOH); and failed to follow Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for 1 of 3 sampled residents with an indwelling urinary device for Resident #112. The findings included: 1. On 09/12/24 at 3:20 PM, a call from the Florida DOH revealed they had received a report of numerous residents on the [NAME] unit that had had a rash that was not identified, not reported to the DOH, and or that the facility was hiding as dermatitis (inflammation of the skin). On 09/13/24, the Director of Nursing (DON) was asked to provide a list of residents that have had any type of rash since 07/01/24 to the present time. The DON provided a list of ten residents, all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 41 citations
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-13 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Surveyor: [NAME], [NAME] Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public, in the common areas on 4 of 5 units ([NAME], Canterbury, [NAME], and [NAME]). The findings included: 1. There was an accumulation of dust and mold-like substance in the air condition vents and ducts on the [NAME] Unit, the Canterbury Unit, the [NAME] Unit and the [NAME] Unit, as well as the common areas and dining areas of the units. 2. In the Shower room on Canterbury unit, there was a large puddle of water on the floor at the commode, the toilet was running, the wall under the shower on the left side of the room was damaged, there was an accumulation of dust on the inside of the air conditioning vent and duct. 3. In the soiled utility room on the Canterbury unit, the wall was damaged inside of entrance to the room, and there was a sink filled with standing dirty water. 4. The wall in the employee bathroom of the [NAME]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to honor resident's choice to sleep in and utilize a reclining chair for 1 of 7 reviewed for choices, Resident #138. The findings included: Review of Resident #138 medical records revealed the resident had multiple admissions with the latest admission on [DATE]. He has diagnoses that included Lymphedema, Chronic Systolic Congestive Heart Failure, Venous Insufficiency, Chronic Kidney Disease, Anxiety Disorder, Depression, Dyspnea, and Severe Morbid Obesity. His MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicting cognition is intact. Review of the physician Progress Notes on 09/12/24, with a service date of 09/10/24, revealed the physician documented the resident is not being compliant with elevating his legs during the day, but he is wearing compressive ACE wraps. He documented he has given up on trying to get a recliner chair for his room which would assist in elevating his legs. He was trying to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolatedHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to promptly act on and resolve grievances voiced by residents and the Resident Council, for 8 of the residents interviewed, including Residents #113, #85, #143, #13, #122, #27, #95, and #60. Four of 4 residents in the Resident Council meeeting voiced food concerns that included Residents #85, #113, #116 and #135. The census at the time of the survey was 146. The findings included: Record review of Resident #113's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment documented Resident #113, with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. An interview was conducted on 09/09/24 at 10:17 AM with Resident #113, the Resident Council President, who when asked of any grievances that had not been resolved by the facility, replied that grievances related to food were ongoing and had not been resolved. During the interview, Resident #113 granted permission to this Surveyor to review Resident Council Meeting Minutes and Food Committee Meeting minutes. Record review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 sampled resident was free from physical restraint, Resident #128. The findings included: Review of the policy, titles, Identifying Seclusion and Unauthorized Restraint, revised 06/2023, documented, in part, As part of the abuse prevention strategy, volunteers, employees and contractors hired by this facility are expected to be able to identify involuntary seclusion and/or unauthorized restraint of residents. Unauthorized Physical Restraints: 1. Residents are free from the use of any physical restraints not required to treat their medical condition. 2. Physical restraint is defined as any manual method, physical or mechanical device, equipment, or material that meets all of the following criteria: a. Is attached or adjacent to a resident's body; b. Cannot be removed easily by the resident (in the same manner as it was applied by the staff); and c. Restricts the resident's freedom of movement or normal access to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate assessments for 2 of 42 sampled resident records reviewed, Residents #48 and #60, as evidenced for Resident #48 related to visual impairment and Resident #60 for use of antianxiety medications. The findings included: 1. Review of Resident #48 medical records revealed Resident #48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses tha included Heart Failure, Hypertension, Diabetes Mellitus, and Major Depressive Disorder. Review of the resident's care plan initiated and revised on 03/10/23 documented the resident is at risk for complications and impaired visual function related to dry eyes syndrome and complications of Diabetes. The interventions included to observe for and report to the nurse any complaints of eye discomfort / pain, any noted problems with or any complaints of change in eyesight. To report and document as needed (PRN) any signs or symptoms of acute eye problems: Change in ability to perform ADLs [Activity…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement care plans for 1 of 3 sampled residents related to behaviors reviewed for catheter, Resident #91, and the facility failed to develop and implement care plans to accurately account for vision deficit for 1 of 2 sampled residents reviewed for vision, Resident #48. The findings included: 1. Record review revealed Resident #91 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the resident's most recent full assessment, a Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed Resident #91 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 04, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Resident #91's diagnoses at the time of the assessment included: Heart Failure, Hypertension, Obstructive Uropathy, Diabetes Mellitus, Hemiplegia, History of cerebral infarction, Retention of urine, and Adult failure to thrive. Resident #91 was not interviewable. Review of Resident #91's orders included: On 01/06/24, Indwelling Urinary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to revise care plans for 2 of 9 sampled residents reviewed for nutrition and or medication use, Residents #81 and #79, as evidenced by the care plan for Resident #81 lacked information related to being aggressive toward others, and the care plan for Resident #79 noted the resident had a fluid restriction order that had been discontinued. The findings included: 1. Review of the record revealed Resident #81 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further review revealed the resident was moved to different rooms on 04/20/24 and 09/04/24 after a resident-to-resident altercation. Review of the current care plans lacked any documentation related to physical aggression or any resident-to-resident events or conflicts. During an interview on 09/12/24 at 2:01 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) agreed Resident #81 had had two resident-to-resident events and was surprised this was not noted in any of the care plans. During an interview on 09/12/24 at 2:32 PM, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, the facility failed to provide services of peri care and failed to get a resident out of bed as requested for 1 of 1 sampled resident, Resident #44, reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). The findings included: Clinical record review revealed Resident #44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included: medically complex conditions. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, reference date 09/03/24, recorded a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 14, indicating Resident #44 was cognitively intact. This MDS evidenced Resident #44 exhibited moods that included: Feeling down, depressed, or hopeless. Poor appetite or overeating. Feeling bad for herself - or that she is a failure or have let herself or her family down. This MDS also documented Resident #44 required substantial / maximal assistance with toileting hygiene, shower / bath self, and lower body dressing, and required partial / moderate assistance with upper body dressing. Additional review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and Hospice Agreement review, the facility failed to ensure coordination of care and services for 2 of 2 sampled residents, as evidenced by the lack of orders for Hospice services and oxygen use for Resident #25; and failure to coordinate the provision of an offloading boot, lack of Certificate of Terminal Illness (CTI) paperwork, and lack of current Hospice notes for Resident #87. The findings included: Review of the Hospice Agreement effective 01/15/24 documented, 6a. Patient admission Process: 1. ii. 3. Hospice shall notify Home, as appropriate, of patients being admitted to service, the day of the referral. Hospice shall provide copies of the Initial Hospice admission paperwork. 8. Coordination, Supervision and Evaluation of the Care/Service: . b. Home Responsibilities . iv. Home shall assist the Hospice in the coordination of patient care from admission up through and including discharge from service. 1) Review of the record revealed Resident #25 was admitted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to follow their fall prevention policy for initiating new interventions, updating care plans, and ensuring supervision to prevent falls for 1 of 4 sampled residents reviewed for accidents (Resident #128). The findings included: Review of the policy Falls - Managing, Preventing, and Documentation revised 01/2024 documented, Standard: Based on previous evaluations and current data, the staff will identify interventions related to the resident's specific risks and causes to try to prevent the resident from falling and to try to minimize complications from falling. Guideline: The resident's plan of care will be developed and followed accordingly to prevent or minimize the risk of falls or fall related injuries. Resident-Centered Approaches to Managing Falls and Fall Risk: 1. The staff will implement a resident-centered fall prevention plan to reduce the specific risk factor(s) of falls for each resident at risk or with a history…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to secure medication storage on 2 of 5 units, as evidenced by leaving the medication and treatment carts unlocked and unattended on the [NAME] Unit, the designated memory care unit, and a random observation of non-secured ointments on the [NAME] Unit. The findings included: 1) An observation on 09/09/24 at 11:43 AM revealed the medication cart was positioned against the wall in the common area of the [NAME] unit, unlocked with at least three bubble pack medication cards with pills in at least one pack, noted on top of the cart. Staff K, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) was noted at the desk on the other side of the common area, working on the computer. The LPN retrieved the bubble pack medication from the medication cart, but left the medication cart unlocked (Photographic Evidence Obtained). During the continued observation on 09/09/24 at 12:01 PM, both the medication cart and the treatment cart remained unlocked in the common area. Although three staff were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure complete and current medical records for 3 of 42 sampled residents (Resident #5, #26 and #81). The findings included: Review of the policy Documentation revised 01/2024 documented, Procedure: . 2. The following information is to be documented in the resident medical record: . c) Treatments or services performed; 1) During an observation on 09/09/24 at 10:41 AM, Resident #5 was noted with thick elongated toenails. The resident reported he had not been seen by a podiatrist. Review of the record revealed Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the electronic medical record lacked any documented podiatry services. During an interview on 09/12/24 at 4:44 PM, when asked about podiatry services for Resident #5, the Social Services Director (SSD) stated the resident had been seen by the podiatrist. When asked to locate and provide evidence of the services, the SSD was unable to locate any documented podiatry service…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0847 — isolatedInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the client's Arbitration agreement and interview, the facility failed to ensure the arbitration agreement is explained to the resident or representative in a manner they understand, and had a signature from the resident if they agreed to the arbitration agreement, for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for Arbitration (Resident #149 and Resident #143). The findings included: During the initial entrance conference on 09/09/24 at 9:17 AM, the surveyor requested a list of residents who currently reside in the facility and entered into a binding arbitration agreement. On 09/11/24 Surveyor was given a list of residents that have a Y or a N next to their name. Surveyor chose three residents that were recently admitted to the facility with a high BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) to interview. A review of Resident #149 medical records revealed this resident is on the Rehab unit (SSU) and admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her 5-day Medicare MDS (Minimum Data Set) documents her BIMS (Brief Interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain a functioning call system for 1 of 26 sampled residents, Resident #27; and failed to maintain a call light in a manner to be accessible to the resident for 1 of 26 sampled residents, Resident #95. The findings included: 1. Record review revealed Resident #27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the resident's most recent complete assessment, a Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed Resident #27 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating cognitive was intact. During an interview with Resident #27, on 09/10/24 at 9:20 AM, and the surveyor requested Resident #27 to initiate the call system by pressing a button at the end of the call light cord. Resident #27 pressed the button and there was no light over the door to indicate that the resident had initiated the call light and no signal at the nurse' station to indicate that Resident #27 had initiated the call light. At the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, clean comfortable homelike environment for the residents. The findings included: A tour of the facility, including resident rooms, was conducted on 07/08/24 at 9:30 AM and a second tour was conducted on 07/10/24 on 12:00 PM, with the Maintenance Director and the Housekeeping Manager. They both acknowledged the following concerns that were identified had during tour: Photographic Evidence Obtained. a. room [ROOM NUMBER] A - The wheelchair arm rests, seat and back of chair were torn. b. room [ROOM NUMBER] - The floor was very dirty with debris that included the corners of the room. room [ROOM NUMBER] - The resident in bed-A stated on 07/08/24 at 9:55 AM that there had been an Ibuprofen pill on the floor that gets pushed around, which has been there a month, and it just gets moved around when they clean and mop. She said they don't clean the toilet and it is filthy with dried up bowel movement. She stataed she has told…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff followed physician orders for blood pressure medication perimeters for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #2) reviewed for medications; and failed to follow physician orders for a wound vac for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for a wound vac (Resident #4) The findings included: 1. Record review for Resident #2 revealed Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Hypertension (high blood pressure), Orthostatic Hypotention, Atrial Fibrillation, and History of Falling, Review of the physician orders revealed the following orders: a) Dilltiazem HCl Oral Tablet 30 MG to give 0.5 tablet by mouth every 6 hours for Hypertension. Hold if SBP(Systolic Blood Pressure) is less than 105 or HR (Heart Rate) is less than 60 (0000-midnight, 6:00 AM, 12:00 PM, and 6:00 PM). b) Metoprolol Succinate ER Tablet Extended Release 24 Hour 25 MG Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for Hypertension. Hold for SBP [Systolic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure interdisciplinary team (IDT) participation in care planning process for 7 of 32 sampled residents, to include food and nutrition services, activities, and therapy, as applicable involving Residents #6, #22, #41, #106, #111, #5, and #8. The findings included: On 07/13/23 during the afternoon, Staff B, Minimum Data Set (MDS) Coordinator, provided requested evidence of interdisciplinary team (IDT) participation in the care planning process for numerous resident's in the survey sample, as the electronic medical record lacked current participation records. An overview of the provided Quality Resident Review Worksheet & Attendance Records, the forms utilized by the facility to document participation in the care planning process, revealed numerous blanks where the signatures of dietary, activities and therapy staff were to be recorded. The MDS Coordinator confirmed the Registered Dietician was only in the building once weekly, and also agreed someone…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility staff failed to speak to 4 of 32 sampled residents in a dignified manner, related to toileting and care, use of cell phones by staff during care, and staff speaking in foreign language during care, Residents #21, #22, #41, and #109. The findings included: 1. Review of the record revealed Resident #21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and moved to her current room on 07/19/22. Review of the current Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/30/23, documented Resident #21 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, on a 0 to 15 scale, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. This MDS also documented the resident did not exhibit any behaviors, and needed the extensive to total assistance from staff for all Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), except eating. This MDS documented locomotion on the unit only occurred once or twice during the seven-day look back period. During an interview on 07/10/23 at 11:04 AM, Resident #21…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-13 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure baths and showers for 2 of 5 sampled residents were provided as per facility schedule and resident request, Resident #22 and #100. The findings included: 1. Review of the record revealed Resident #22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the current MDS assessment dated [DATE], documented the resident had a BIMS score of 10, on a 0 to 15 scale, indicating he had some cognitive impairment. This MDS documented the resident had no behaviors, and that he needed the total assistance of one person for bathing. This MDS also documented it was very important for the resident to choose between a bath and a shower. During an interview on 07/10/23 at 3:12 PM, Resident #22 and his wife were discussing their concerns with the slow or no response by staff, resulting in the resident having incontinent episodes. The resident's wife stated, They don't like giving showers. You have to beg for them. You always get the yes, yes, yes, but nothing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services to maintain a clean, comfortable and homelike environment for 3 of 5 units (Units 100, 200, and 500); and failed to maintain the residents' call lights to be accessible to the residents, for 4 of 53 sampled residents reviewed, Residents #64, #46, #4 and #85. The findings included: 1. Observations on 07/13/23 at approximately 1:00 PM, accompanied with the Director of Maintenance, revealed the following: In room [ROOM NUMBER], the room floors were dirty, the bed linens on the window-bed were stained, there was no toilet seat on the commode, there was an accumulation of trash on the floor, and the commode was not in proper working order. As reported by the residents, the toilet would 'fill up with water and then go down really slow'. In room [ROOM NUMBER], the privacy curtain between the beds was stained, there was an accumulation of residue and debris on the floor and the sink in the shared…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to initiate a new wound care physician order in a timely manner for 1 of 3 sampled residents reviewed for facility-acquired pressure ulcers, Resident #33. The findings included: The policy, titled, Prevention of Pressure Ulcers/ Injuries and revised on 07/17, documented, in part: Review the interventions and strategies for effectiveness on an ongoing basis. Resident #33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Alzheimer's Disease, Type 2 diabetes, history of falls, Atrial Fibrillation, Tremors, Glaucoma, Hyperlipidemia, and muscle wasting with atrophy. The record documented the resident had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 3 of 15, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. On 07/10/23 at 11:53 AM, a telephone interview was conducted with the spouse of Resident #33 to review his care at the facility. She stated her husband has a pressure ulcer on his left heel and she was the one who identified it. She stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-13 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician dietary orders and recommendations for obtaining weights for 3 of 5 sampled residents reviewed for nutrition, Residents #120, #111 and #123, that resulted in significant weight loss for Residents #111 and #123. The findings included: The facility's policy, titled, 'Weight Assessment and Intervention', revised September 2022, documented, in part: Weight Assessment 1. The nursing staff will measure resident weight on admission. If no weight concerns are noted at this point, weights will be measured monthly thereafter. 2. Any weight change of 5% or more since the last weight assessment will be retaken as soon as practical usually within the next day for confirmation. If the weight is verified, nursing will communicate with the Dietitian. 3. The Dietitian will review the Weight Record to follow individual weight trends over time. Negative trends will be evaluated by the treatment team whether or not the criteria for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-13 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to respond to 1 of 1 sampled residents reviewed for vocalization of significant pain which resulted in harm, Resident #36. The findings included: The facility policy, titled, Pain Assessment and Management, documents in part: 2) Pain management is defined as the process for alleviating the resident's pain to a level that is acceptable to the resident and is based on his or clinical condition and established treatment goals. 3)d address the underlying cause of the pain Resident #36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with documented diagnosis to include Dementia, unspecified severity with other behavioral disturbance, history of falling, Osteoarthritis, personal history of Covid 19, and Dysphagia. The resident had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 3 of 15, which indicates severe cognitive impairment. Record review of the nursing progress notes for Resident #36 documented on 03/10/23 at 1:03 PM that the resident 'has been in bed all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-13 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure care and services for 1 of 1 sample resident receiving dialysis, as evidenced by a lack of consistent documentation of coordination between the nursing and dialysis facility; failure to ensure documented pre and post weights to monitor for fluid overload; and failure to inform the physician and/or family of the resident's refusal of dialysis services, Resident #6. The findings included: Review of the record revealed Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #6 received dialysis services from an outside facility every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. Dialysis treatment records were noted as part of the record to ensure communication between the two facilities. Review of the record lacked any communication documentation from the dialysis facility for the month of June 2023, and only included one note dated 07/10/23 for the month of July 2023. On 07/12/23 at 1:30 PM, Staff R, Unit Manager, explained the documented communication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-13 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolatedEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders for 2 of 2 sampled residents with physician ordered fluid restrictions, Residents #22 and 120. The findings included: The facility's policy, titled, 'Fluid Restrictions' documented, in part: Policy Interpretation and Implementation 1). When a physician prescribes a fluid restriction, a communication form notifying the Fod and Nutrition Services department will be completed. 2). If the resident is receiving liquid nourishments for nutritional support. 3). If no clarification of liquid nourishment provided is obtained the liquid nourishment shall be included in the total fluids administered. 4). Water pitchers will be removed from the resident's room. Beverage preferences will be obtained by Food and Nutrition Services designee if possible and reflected on the resident's meal ticket/tray card. 5). Jell-O, ice cream, soup and anything at room temperature that becomes liquid, will be calculated and included in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-03-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facilty failed to serve food in a sanitary manner, according to the food service safety. The Findings Included: On 03/07/22 at 9:28 AM, Conducted an intial brief kitchen tour,accompanied by the Certified Dietary Manager. The following was observed. (1) During the inspection of the walk in refrigerator there was eighteen half pint container of 2% milk, dated 3/2/22. (2) The janitor closet had the broom sitting on the floor sink that was very dirty, and had not been cleaned for a number of weeks. (3) The dry storage room had disposable cups that was not wrapped or place in a bag. (4) The stove drip pan, under the stove burner, was dirty with dried up food. (5) The wall of the oven need cleaning there was black specks all over it. (6) The floor under the oven was dirty, and had not been cleaned for awhile. (7) The dumpster is very dirty and rusted. On 3/7/22 at 10:45AM during a interview with the Certified Dietary Manager, she was informed of the findings. On 03/09/22 at 9:59 AM, an interview was conducted with the Regional Food Service Director.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, clean comfortable homelike environment and to make sure call lights are in reach for 3 of 4 units observed. The findings included: 1. A tour of the facility and resident rooms were conducted on 03/07/22 & 03/08/22, and subsequent tour was then completed on 03/09/22 at 10:00 AM with the Director of Environment, the Administrator, and previous Housekeeping Supervisor. The Environmental Director states they do deep cleaning every month doing two rooms a day. They all acknowledged the findings on the tour. room [ROOM NUMBER]-B-the chair rail is scuffed up behind bed with large patches of white caulking on top of beige color paint. The ceiling is stained in right corner of room, no light bulb in one of two lights above bed and the string to pull the light on and off is broken. room [ROOM NUMBER]-the floors are very dirty and sticky to walk on, grapes smooched on the floor, a urinal observed sitting next to a pitcher of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure interdisciplinary team (IDT) participation, to include the direct care nurse and aide, a member of the food and nutrition services, and other appropriate staff as determined by the resident's need, in the care planning process for 14 of 23 sampled residents (Residents #26, #55, #65, #71, #34, #39, #7, #64, #41, #74, #45, #24, #44 and #62). The facility also failed to review and revise care plans for 3 of 23 sampled residents (Residents #55, #65, #71). The findings included: During an interview on 03/10/22 at 12:05 PM, the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Coordinator, who was responsible for the interdisciplinary care planning process, was asked who was participating in the care planning process on a quarterly and annual basis. The MDS Coordinator stated recently it has been just her and the two social services staff. The MDS Coordinator explained she keeps a record of the care plan meetings and participation on the resident's Care Conference Record. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-03-10 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an ongoing activity program for 8 of 8 sampled residents (Residents #9, #7, #48, #8, #55, #64, #74, #45). The findings included: 1) Observation was conducted on Resident #7, #64, and #74 on 03/07/22 at 9:24 AM whereas Resident #7 and #64 was observed sitting in their wheelchair, in the common resident's area on the [NAME] unit (the memory care unit). There was no activity being provided, there was no stimulation. Resident #7 put his head down sleeping. Resident #64 was sitting in the wheelchair next to the exit door across the medication cart, she put her head down, sleeping. Resident #74 was wandering around the [NAME] unit. On 03/07/22 at 10:25 AM another observation was conducted on the [NAME] unit, 7 residents including Resident #7 and Resident #64 were observed in the resident common area, they were sitting in their wheelchair, all put their heads down, sleeping, there was no activity, no stimulation for the residents. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-10 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and facility assessment review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient nursing staff to ensure provision of timely care for 3 of 23 sampled residents interviewed (Residents #71, #65, and #26); failed to ensure the provision of activities; failed to ensure proper care planning; failed to provide showers (Resident # 27 and Resident #44), and as evidenced by the usage of managerial staff to cover direct care shifts. The findings included: Review of the Facility Assessment updated on 01/01/22 and reviewed with the Quality Assurance Committee on 01/25/22 documented the following staffing needs for an average daily census of 94 to 98 residents: Licensed Nursing: A Director of Nursing which the facility had. An Assistant Director of Nursing which the facility did not have. An RN (Registered Nurse) Unit Manager for the rehabilitation/high acuity unit which the facility did not have. A Long Term Care RN Unit Manager. The facility had a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Unit…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-10 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to provide showers upon request and schedule for for 2 of 5 sampled residents for choices (Residents #27 & #44). The findings included: 1. During an interview on 03/07/2022 at 10:11 AM with Resident #27, she states she has not had a shower in a while. The CNAs tell her they have 27 residents to take care of and they don't have time to give me a shower. Review of the resident record revealed Resident #27 was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis to include Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Malignant Neoplasm, Anxiety, Adult Failure to Thrive, Polyneuropathy, and Corneal Ulcer. Review of her quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 01/03/22 reveals she has a BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status) score of a 15 which means her cognition is intact. She is extensive assist one person for personal hygiene, dressing and transfers. Her functional status includes Physical Help in bathing with one person assist. Review of her Care Plan documents the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-10 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and inability to review resident personal funds accounts, the facility failed to ensure availability of personal funds for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #26). The findings included: During an interview on 03/08/22 at 9:49 AM, Resident #26 stated she had not been able to get any money from her personal funds account with the facility since the change in ownership. When asked what the facility staff said to her when she asked for some money, Resident #26 stated they ask, What do you need the money for? Resident #26 stated she needs some shoes and needs to pay her cell phone bill. When asked if the facility staff told her when she could get some money, Resident #26 stated they have not told her, but she overheard a staff person talking about residents being able to get money on the 15th of the month. Resident #26 stated she tried to get the money last week. During an interview on 03/10/22 at 10:29 AM, the Business Office Manager (BOM) explained the process for a resident to get money from their personal funds account would be to get petty cash for amounts of $50…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-10 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure consistency in the record related to the code status (documentation that directs staff to provide or hold cardiopulmonary resuscitation/CPR), for 1 of 1 sampled resident. A Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) request had been requested by Resident #71, and the yellow copy for emergency personnel had been executed, but the physician's current orders documented Resident #71 as a Full Code status. The findings included: Review of the record revealed Resident #71 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a code status of full code, indicating if the resident's heart would stop or the resident stopped breathing, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) would be conducted by the facility staff. Further review of the record revealed a yellow copy of the Do Not Resuscitate Order signed by Resident #71 and the physician that was dated [DATE]. Review of the current physician orders documented the code status for Residents #71 as a full code since the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation , record review and interview the facility failed to develop and implement care plan for Activities, and for the use of Diuretic medicaiton, for 3 of 23 sampled Residents (Residents #8, 9 and 42). The Findings included: 1) Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].Brief interview for Mental Status, (BIMS) score is 13.TheResident pertinent diagnosis is Metabolic Encephalopathy unspecified Sequelae of cerebral infraction. The Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) was completed on 12/14/21. On 3/8/22 at 2:01PM The Resident observed in bed for the pass 2 days. The Resident state that he did not have activities. Record review of the Resident Electronic Medical Chart revealed that Resident #8 did not have a Care Plan for Activities. ON 03/10/22 02:22 PM conduct interview with the MDS Coordinator she informed me that the Resident care plan for activities was never developed. 2) Resident #9 was admitted on [DATE]. His Minimum Data Set Assesment (MDS) was completed on 12/15/21. Pertinent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-10 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure assistance with eating for Resident #34 who had significant weight loss, for 1 of 4 sampled resident. The findings included: On 03/08/22 at 11:49 AM Resident #34 was observed with the lunch tray in front of her, she did not touch the food, she was not being provided assistance with feeding. Resident #34 was severely confused and not aware of what to do with the food. On 03/10/22 at 11:44 AM another observation was made on Resident #34 during lunch time. The food tray was observed in front of her, she did not touch the food, including the peanut butter and jelly sandwich. Resident #34 was staring at the food on the tray, she was very confused, she did not know what to do with the food, no one was assisting her with eating. When asked, Staff A, a certified nursing assistant was someone supposed to be providing assistance to Resident #34 with feeding, Staff A stated, Resident #34 was supposed to be feeding herself independently, she did…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-10 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on personnel file review and interview, the facility failed to ensure annual evaluations were completed for 3 of 3 sampled Certified Nursing Assistants (Staff G, H, and I). The findings included: On 03/10/22 at 4:23 PM, Personnel files were reviewed with Human Resources (HR) and the Regional HR Manager. Surveyor had requested to see annual staff evaluations, they were unable to locate any in the files they had on hand but stated that the DON (Director of Nursing) would be responsible for completing the evaluations. They acknowledged that the files and the annual evaluations are not up to date. The Regional HR Manager explained that with the change in ownership on 03/01/22, they did not have the complete files, all staff had a new starting date of 03/01/22. Surveyor requested to see a Policy & Procedure for doing evaluations but was advised they do not have one. A side-by-side review of the personnel files for Staff A, a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) who was originally hired on 02/26/13, Staff J, a CNA who was originally hired on 08/24/16; and Staff K, a CNA who was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to properly secure medication for 2 of 4 units ([NAME] and [NAME]). The findings included: 1. On 03/07/22 at 11:17 AM the [NAME] medication cart was observed parked in the hallway, it was left unlocked and unattended, the nurse was sitting at the nursing station, away from the medication cart. There were 7 residents on the unit at the time, there was a resident sitting immediately across from the medication cart. The surveyor observed the medication cart, the nurse did not acknowledge if the medication cart was left unlocked. At 11:23 AM the surveyor informed the nurse the medication cart was left unlocked; she then gets up and locked it. This was on the memory care unit which has 5 residents who were independently ambulatory with confusion. Resident # 35, the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment reference date 01/08/22 indicated Resident #35 had brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 00 for severely cognitively impaired.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-10 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an as needed (PRN) antianxiety medication is limited to 14 days, with documented appropriateness for use, and with a documented duration, for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #65). The findings included: Review of the record revealed Resident #65 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the current Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #65 received an antianxiety medication 3 of 7 days during the look back period. Review of the record revealed a current order dated 02/19/22 for the antianxiety medication Xanax 0.5 mg (milligrams) to be given every 12 hours as needed. This order had a documented end date of Indefinite. Further review of the record revealed a previous order dated 01/21/22 for the Xanax 0.5 mg to be given every 24 hours as needed, again with an Indefinite end date. This order was discontinued on 02/19/21, twenty-nine days after the order was written. During an interview on 03/10/22 at 5:48…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-10 · tag F0886 — failed to test for COVID-19 as required — isolatedPerform COVID19 testing on residents and staff.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, review of completed COVID-19 staff testing, and the county level of community transmission, the facility failed to ensure twice weekly COVID-19 testing for the current past four weeks for the 18 unvaccinated staff of the 92 total staff (weeks of 02/13/22, 02/20/22, 02/27/22 and 03/6/22). The findings included: During an interview on 03/07/22 at 3:30 PM, the Director of Nursing, who was also the Infection Control Preventionist (ICP) was asked the current COVID-19 testing schedule. The DON/ICP stated they were testing all staff once a week on Mondays. The DON/ICP was asked to provide evidence of the county level of community transmission for the past four weeks along with evidence of when they tested. The DON/ICP stated they are doing routine staff testing at the present as they are not in outbreak mode (have not had a positive result). Review of the list of current staff revealed there were 18 unvaccinated staff out of a total of 92 staff. Review of the COVID-19 line lists documented the last COVID-19 positive resident was on 01/27/22 and the last positive staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-10 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a functional and appropriate call bell for Resident #82. The findings included: During an initial tour of Resident #82's room on 03/07/22, the resident's call bell was noted behind the bed, and not in reach of the resident. It was then noted that the red button to call light wass not functioning, it does not push in. Resident #82 was noted with contractures to both hands. The Resident was asked if he could push down on the call light and he stated No. Review of Resident #82 record reveal the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Parkinson Disease, Unspecified Sequelae of Cerebral Infarction, Dysarthria, Schizoaffective Disorder, Bipolar Type, Mild Intellectual Disabilities, Hypertension, Major Depressive Disorder, Contracture right & left hand, and Pseudobulbar Affect. A review of the MDS (Minimum Data Set) revealed the resident has a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) of a 9, which means moderately impaired…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2024-09-13 · tag F0732 — patternPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure timely posting of nurse staffing information on 4 of 5 day during the survey (Monday 09/09/24 through Thursday 09/12/24). The finding included: On 09/09/24 at 8:40 AM, upon entrance to the facility the nurse staffing information, that included the number of Registered Nurses, Licensed Practical Nurses, and Certified Nursing Assistants, along with the actual hours worked by each category, was not posted in the lobby area. At 9:09 AM a walk-through of the facility was conducted, to include a second observation of the lobby area and all units in the main building, and no nurse staffing information was found. Upon arrival to the facility on [DATE] at 8:30 AM, the nurse staffing information for 09/09/24 was noted in the lobby on the receptionist desk (Photographic Evidence Obtained). When asked who was responsible for the posting, the staff sitting at the receptionist desk stated, I'm really not sure, but (name of Administrator) has something to do…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to ASTON HEALTH — 38 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.7 | -1.7 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.1 | ≈ chain avg |
The other 37 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.7★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VERO BEACH OPCO HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 10/18/2021 |
| WILDES, DONNA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/28/2025 |
| BALLOUT, HUSSIEN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/30/2026 |
| BENJAMIN, BERNARD | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/05/2026 |
| KITCHEN, TIFFANY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 12/29/2025 |
| WASHINGTON, MARQUITA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 02/18/1984 |
| ASTON HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2022 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $2.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in FL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 105474. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-09-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.