No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Vero Beach Care Center

1310 37th St, Vero Beach, FL 32960 · For profit - Corporation · 159 certified beds · (772) 569-5107 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (772) 569-5107 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0604) — cited Sep 2024Resident-funds citation (F0565)2 actual-harm citations
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (50) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • about 18% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1460 36th St · (772) 562-7777 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Grocery
4346 28th Ct · (772) 501-7817 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1920 38th Ln · (772) 562-6440

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased4.6%8.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.9%5.5%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.2%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.7%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms3.6%4.6%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.2%2.5%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened5.5%9.5%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication3.1%14.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%99.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.7%4.5%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control22.9%10.5%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table10.5%8.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.2%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.3%94.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission28.7%26.1%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.0%9.1%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.752.131.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.551.151.80better

‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 168 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

50.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
46.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.34U.S. median 0.30
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.17hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.14hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 46.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 124 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2025Q4 — more than 60% of the 13,714 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 43% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 14% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF50.0%CMS range 43.7–57.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.6%CMS range 6.7–12.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge46.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge49.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge31.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified87.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting98.7%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge98.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.1%CMS range 4.3–11.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.261.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.27
RN hours/ resident / day
1.05
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.11
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.43
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.14
RN hoursweekends
48.9%
Total nursing turnover
80.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 159 beds and averages 152.0 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.43 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.27 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.11 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.16 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.56 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.38 to 0.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

12 ↓
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-19)
19
at the previous standard inspection (2024-09-13)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

50 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 38 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-07-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care related to incontinence care, oral and personal hygiene, and personal grooming for 5 of 9 sampled residents, Residents #228, #6, #106, #16, #111. This failure in ADL assistance resulted in psychosocial harm for Resident #228. The findings included: 1. Review of clinical record revealed Resident #228 had been a previous resident who had been discharged home on [DATE] but had been re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] due to the inability to care for himself at home. Resident #228 had diagnoses that included: Idiopathic Peripheral Autonomic Neuropathy, Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD), Hypertensive Heart Disease without Heart Failure, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Hyperlipidemia, Type-2 Diabetes with Circulatory Complications, Absence of Right Leg above the Knee, Osteomyelitis, Muscle Weakness, and Dysphasia. The Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed on 06/12/23 documented…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-07-13 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing to ensure care and services to meet the needs of bathing and showering for 2 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #22 and #100); to provide incontinence care, oral and personal hygiene, and grooming for 5 of 32 sampled residents (Residents #6, #16, #106, #111, and #228); and to follow dietary recommendations and orders for obtaining weights for 3 of 5 sampled residents (Residents #111, #120, and #123). Interviews from random residents, families, and staff revealed voiced concerns of a lack of staff. Review of current residents with skin impairments revealed 7 of 9 current pressure injuries were facility acquired (Residents #33, #72, #51, #20, #64, #10, and #76). The facility utilized managers to supplement Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) assignments on 2 of 13 days reviewed. The findings included: 1. Residents #22 and #100 voiced concerns with a lack of staff and indicated they were not being provided baths and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was treated in a dignified manner for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for dignity, Resident #171. The findings included:Review of the policy for Resident Rights dated 09/21 and revised 01/24 documents: A facility must treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life. Employees shall treat all residents with kindness, respect and dignity. These rights include the resident's right to: a. dignified existence; b. be treated with respect, kindness and dignity.Record review documents Resident #171 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include: Acute Kidney Failure, Alcoholic Cirrhosis of the Liver with Ascites, End Stage Renal Disease, Dependence on Renal Dialysis, Muscle Weakness, Muscle Wasting and Atrophy, Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia with Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms and Lack of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-19 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain a completed informed consent (with date) for residents prescribed psychotropic medications for 1 of 5 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medication review, Resident #9. The findings included:Review of the facility's policy, titled, Medication Utilization and Prescribing - Clinical Protocol, with a revised date of 01/2024, included in part the following: Consent for medications including but not limited to psychotropic medications are included in the consent to treat. Review of the facility's policy, titled, Documentation, with a revised date of 01/2026, included in part the following: Documentation for procedure and treatments will include care-specific details, including the date and time the procedure/treatment was provided. Record review for Resident #9 revealed the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the most recent readmission on [DATE] with diagnoses that included in part the following: Generalized…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-19 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the accommodation of needs for 1 of 1 sampled resident as evidenced by the lack of bedside rails for Resident #42 as per the facility's assessment and the resident's request. The findings included:Review of the facility's policy titled, Proper Use of Side Rails, dated September 2022, documented in part, 1. Side rails are only permissible if used to treat a resident's medical symptoms or assist with mobility and transfer of residents, or at the request of the resident or resident's representative. 2. A side rail evaluation will be completed to determine the resident's need for using side rails. Review of the record for Resident #42 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included mild Left-Hand Contracture (left hand curling inwards) and Ataxia (lack of muscle control or coordination). Review of the current Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/04/26, documented a Brief…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment in 5 of 14 resident rooms in the [NAME] Unit affecting residents in rooms 107, 112, 115, 116, and 117. The findings included:Review of the facility's policy titled, Homelike Environment, with a revised date of 01/2025, included in part the following: Staff shall provide person-centered care that emphasizes the resident's comfort, independence and personal needs and preferences. Comfortable and adequate lighting is provided in all areas of the facility to promote a safe, comfortable and homelike environment. The facility staff and management shall provide to the extent possible: a clean, safe, comfortable homelike environment catered to the resents personal preferences as able. 1. On 02/16/26 at 11:30 AM, an observation was made in the bathroom of room [ROOM NUMBER] of the emergency pull cord in the bathroom wrapped around the grab bar. Both residents in the room utilize the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-19 · tag F0635 — isolated
    Provide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that when residents are admitted to the facility that there are physician orders for the residents' immediate care for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for dialysis, Resident #171. The findings included:Review of the facility Policy and Procedure for New Admissions issued 01/19 and revised 02/24 documents, in part, the following: the primary purpose of our admission policies is to establish uniform guidelines for personnel to follow in admitting residents to the facility. The objectives of our admission policies are to admit residents who can be adequately cared for by the facility, reduce the fears and anxieties of the resident and family during the admission process, and assure the appropriate medical and financial records are provided to the facility prior to or upon the resident's admission. Review of Resident #171 medical records revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis to include Acute Kidney Failure,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-19 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately code antipsychotic medication use for 1 of 5 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, Resident #82; failed to accurately code mobility status for 1 of 4 sampled residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living, Resident #42; and failed to code the presence of a colostomy for 1 of 3 sampled residents reviewed, Resident #153. The findings Included:1. Clinical record review revealed Resident #82 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a readmission on [DATE], with diagnoses including Non-Alzheimer's Dementia, Anxiety Disorder, and Depression. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/04/25 revealed the following: Under Section N (Medications), item N0410A (Antipsychotic Medications), the resident was coded as No. Review of the December 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR) indicated the resident received Seroquel (quetiapine) 25 mg by mouth twice daily for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure appropriate care and services for 6 of 44 sampled residents as evidenced by the failure to ensure hospice nursing services for Resident #29; failure to ensure timely medication administration for Residents #110, #155, and #169; and failure to follow physician ordered blood pressure parameters for Residents #1 and #41. Findings include:Review of the Hospice Agreement dated January 5, 2024, between the hospice agency and the facility indicated: Hospice agrees to provide services to eligible residents according to a hospice plan. Regulations require that each hospice patient has a hospice plan, and that all services provided be consistent with such plan. Hospice shall provide the appropriate scope and frequency of services individualized to patient needs. Home shall prepare and maintain medical records for each hospice patient receiving services pursuant to the agreement. Medical records shall consist of progress notes describing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-19 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with indwelling urinary catheters have care provided for indwelling urinary catheter for 1 of 4 sampled residents reviewed for urinary catheter or UTI (Urinary Tract Infection), Resident #14; failed to ensure indwelling urinary catheters were maintained in a manner to prevent infection for 1 of 4 sampled residents reviewed for urinary catheter or UTI, Resident #68; and failed to ensure proper peri care for 1 of 4 sampled resident reviewed for Urinary catheter/UTI, Resident #41. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy, titled, Catheter Care -Quality of Care, with a revised date of 01/2024, included in part the following: Routine hygiene and care of the peri area is appropriate when providing incontinence care and bathing. Ensure the drainage spigot is not touching the floor. 1. Record review for Resident #68 revealed the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with most recent readmission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure care and services for oxygen equipment for 1 of 2 sampled residents as evidenced by the failure to clean the oxygen filter for Resident #77.The findings included:Review of the record revealed Resident #77 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, a progressive lung disease making it difficult to breathe) and shortness of breath. Review of the current Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, on a 0 to 15 scale, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. This MDS also documented the resident was on oxygen therapy.Physician orders documented as of 01/30/26, Resident #77 was receiving oxygen continuously at 2 liters per minute for shortness of breath. The current orders documented instructions for staff to change the oxygen tubing weekly, but lacked any orders related to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-19 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure pain management for 1 of 4 sampled residents, as evidenced by the failure to provide pain medication as per physician's orders for Resident #66.The findings included:Review of the policy, titled, Medication Administration, issued on 10/2020 and revised on 01/2024, documented in part, 22. Medications, including narcotics, will be reordered as needed with practitioner approval unless otherwise indicated (auto-refill from pharmacy, emergency medication supply use).Review of the record revealed Resident #66 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included Alcohol Dependence, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Opioid Dependence, Chronic Pain Syndrome, Pain in Right and Left Knees, and Other Low Back Pain. Review of the most current Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment documented that Resident #66 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition.Review of physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 38 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-19 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents who were trauma survivors had triggers identified and implemented in the care plan in order to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident for 1 of 1 sampled resident review for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), Resident #7. The findings included: Review of Resident #7's records revealed Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE] from the hospital, with diagnoses that included PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder), Major Depressive Disorder, Generalized Anxiety, Insomnia, Type II Diabetes, Coronary Artery Disease, Alcoholic Cardiomyopathy, Migraines, Muscle Weakness and Chronic Obstructive Disease. (COPD). Review of Resident #7 MDS (Minimum Data Set) Medicare 5-day assessment dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 indicating the resident had moderate cognition impairment.Review of the resident's care plan documented the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-19 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure adequate monitoring of side effects and behaviors for residents receiving psychotropic medications for 1 of 5 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, Residents #9. The finding included:Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Utilization and Prescribing - Clinical Protocol, with a revised date of 01/2024, included in part the following: The physician and staff will identify situations in which a resident is taking medications associated with potentially significant medication-related problems such as allergies, drug-drug interactions, drug-food interactions and adverse drug reactions. The physician and IDT (Interdisciplinary Team) will identify significant factors that may affect medication effectiveness and medication related problems. Risks and benefits of utilization of psychotropic mediations will be reviewed with resident and/or responsible party prior to initiation or increased dose as indicated. Record review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-20 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and clinical and administrative record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 8 sampled residents, Resident #5, was assessed by the interdisciplinary team and established a plan of care for self-administration of medication before the resident participated in the practice. The findings included: An observation was conducted on 05/19/25 at 10:50 AM with Resident #5. Upon speaking with the resident, the surveyor noticed that there were approximately 10 bottles of pills and liquid supplements neatly stored on the resident's night stand. The bottles were noted to be open. Photographic Evidence Obtained. The following supplements were stored on the night stand: 1. Two (2) bottles of 32 ounces of MCT oil weight management 2. Two (2) bottles of Nugenix Thermo X 3. One (1) bottle of weight loss probiotics 4. One (1) bottle of Veggies capsule 5. One (1) bottle of Testerone Booster 6. One (1) bottle of Fruit Dietary Supplement 7. One (1) bottle of Nugenix Ultimate Testerone Booster An…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-20 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical and administrative record review, the facility failed to honor the resident's bath preference and ensure the resident consistently received his bath preference for 1 of 8 sampled resident, Resident #4. The findings included: During the observational tour of the facility on 05/19/25 at 11:30 AM, the surveyor approached Resident #4, who was sitting in his wheelchair in front of his room. The resident voiced his dissatisfaction that they forget about us in room [room number]. The housekeeping aide was observed in the room at this time mopping the floor. The resident stated, I haven't got my medications yet and has gone about 3 weeks without a shower. They don't ever change my linen. I told them my toilet is leaking, and they don't do anything about it. The resident stated that they will wash him in his private area, but he wants a shower. He stated also that he has said he prefers to wear the pull up type of incontinent briefs but some of the aides keep putting the ones with the tabs…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-20 · tag F0675 — failed to support quality of life — isolated
    Honor each resident's preferences, choices, values and beliefs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical and administrative record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the residents received the necessary care and services for skin assessments and timely medication administration, as evidenced by the facility's consistent failure to respond in a timely manner fo residents who developed new skin issues and failed to ensure that residents received their prescribed medications in a timely manner, for 3 of 8 sampled residents, Residents # 1, # 4 and # 6. The findings included: 1. Record review revealed Resident #1 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnosis which includes, Diabetes Mellitus, Cerebrovascular disease, Chronic Kidney disease, Stage 3, Essential Hypertension, and Blind Left eye. Review of the resident's plan of care identified a concern initiated on 02/24/25, The resident has a Skin Impairment: eczema. Interventions included: Encourage and assist resident to Off Load Heels as ordered Monitor the Resident's changes in skin condition, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure all medications and/or supplements were not stored at the residents' bedside but were safely secured in locked compartments for 1 of 8 sampled residents, Resident #5. The findings included: An interview was conducted on 05/19/25 at 10:50 AM with Resident #5. Upon speaking with the resident, the surveyor observed there were approximately 10 bottles of pills and liquid supplements neatly stored unsecured on top of the resident's bedside night stand. Photographic Evidence Obtained. The following supplemental pills were stored on the night stand and clearly visible upon entering the resident's side of the room: 1. Two (2) bottles of 32 ounces of MCT oil weight management 2. Two (2) bottles of Nugenix Thermo X - 60 capsules bottles 3. One (1) bottle of weight loss probiotics 4. One (1) bottle of Veggies capsule 5. One (1) bottle of Testerone Booster 6. One (1) bottle of Fruit Dietary Supplement 7. One (1) bottle of Nugenix Ultimate Testerone Booster. An interview was conducted with the resident at this time revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide necessary care and services to prevent, identify and properly assess wounds, for 1 of 2 sampled residents reviewed for wounds (Resident #3), as evidenced by the facility failed to identify the blister or subsequent open wound to the resident's right foot, prior to surveyor intervention; the wound care nurse failed to properly assess the wound, documenting erroneous measurements and staff nurses failed to capture the wound during skin check assessment completed on 02/11/25, the day prior to the surveyor's observation. The findings included: Observation of wound care conducted on 02/12/25 at 10:20 AM revealed the Wound Care Nurse (WCN) performed wound care for Resident #3's left foot. At the end of the treatment, the surveyor asked the reason why the offloading boot was only applied to the left leg, as the resident was severely contracted on both legs. The WCN responded that the resident prefers to lay on the left side and that is where the wound is located, so an offloading boot is not necessary to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide necessary care and services to prevent and promote healing of pressure ulcers, for 2 of 2 sampled residents reviewed for pressure wounds, Resident #3 and Resident #1. The findings included: Review of the policy, titled, Wound Care and Treatment, revised 01/2024, documented, in part: Standard: The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the care of wounds to promote healing. Guideline: Only staff trained to complete physician orders will complete wound care and treatments as prescribed. Procedure: Preparation 1. Verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure . 4. Assess residents pain level as needed. Equipment and Supplies: The following equipment and supplies will be necessary when performing this procedure . 12. Assess residents tolerance of wound care throughout the procedure. 16. Reposition the bed covers. Make the resident comfortable. Use supportive devices as instructed. Documentation: The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide maintenance and housekeeping services to maintain a clean, comfortable and homelike environment on 4 of 5 units and in common areas. The findings included: During an environmental tour of the facility on 09/12/24 at 4:25 PM with the Maintenance Director, the following was observed: a. In room [ROOM NUMBER], there were two picture hanging hooks protruding from the wall with sharp points on them by the head of the bed. b. In room [ROOM NUMBER], there was an accumulation of residue on the exterior of the wall mounted air conditioning unit and an accumulation of debris inside of the vents of the unit. c. In room [ROOM NUMBER], there were multiple holes in the wall from where the chair rail once was. d. In room [ROOM NUMBER], the wall by the wall mounted air conditioning unit was in disrepair. e. In room [ROOM NUMBER], the bed frame was in disrepair and showed signs of wear. f. In room [ROOM NUMBER], there was residue and debris on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-13 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing as evidence by falls and a consistent stale urine odor on 1 of 5 units ([NAME]); lack of ADL care for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #44); lack of Hospice coordination for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #25 and #87); and voiced complaints by residents, families, staff, and resident council. The findings included: 1) Resident #128, who was admitted to the facility on [DATE], sustained eleven falls while residing on the [NAME] unit. Review of these falls lacked evidence the facility followed their fall prevention policy. (Refer to F689 for details). Review of the fall log from 07/01/24 through the survey date of 09/13/24 revealed the facility had 38 falls, 10 of which were on the [NAME] unit. Upon entering the [NAME] unit on all five days of the survey (09/09/24 - 09/13/24) a constant urine odor was noted throughout. Although a specific resident was not identified during the survey, the odors remained. 2)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide food prepared, stored and served in a sanitary manner and in accordance with professional standards for food safety. The findings included: 1). During the initial kitchen tour, on 09/09/24 at 8:43 AM, accompanied by the Dietary Manager, the following were noted: a. The hand washing sink and the baseboard by the food assembly area were not secured to the wall. b. Cleaned and sanitized utensils (knives, forks and spoons) were not inverted while being stored and were stored directly underneath the hand washing sink. c. The floor paint was noted to be peeling throughout the kitchen. d. There was an accumulation of debris and residue on blade and mechanism of the counter mounted can opener. e. The shelving underneath the hot holding unit was damaged and rusted. f. There was an accumulation of dust on the air conditioning vents in the ceiling throughout the kitchen. g. The oven mitts were noted to be torn and uncleanable. h. In the walk in cooler, there were packages of raw beef stored directly over a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to follow infection control standards to ensure appropriate treatment for a rash outbreak on 1 of 5 units ([NAME] Unit) affecting sampled Residents #25, #30, #32, #33, #40, #42, #56, #73, #87, #93, #99, #109, #123, and #133; failed to report a rash outbreak to the Florida Department of Health (DOH); and failed to follow Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for 1 of 3 sampled residents with an indwelling urinary device for Resident #112. The findings included: 1. On 09/12/24 at 3:20 PM, a call from the Florida DOH revealed they had received a report of numerous residents on the [NAME] unit that had had a rash that was not identified, not reported to the DOH, and or that the facility was hiding as dermatitis (inflammation of the skin). On 09/13/24, the Director of Nursing (DON) was asked to provide a list of residents that have had any type of rash since 07/01/24 to the present time. The DON provided a list of ten residents, all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-13 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Surveyor: [NAME], [NAME] Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public, in the common areas on 4 of 5 units ([NAME], Canterbury, [NAME], and [NAME]). The findings included: 1. There was an accumulation of dust and mold-like substance in the air condition vents and ducts on the [NAME] Unit, the Canterbury Unit, the [NAME] Unit and the [NAME] Unit, as well as the common areas and dining areas of the units. 2. In the Shower room on Canterbury unit, there was a large puddle of water on the floor at the commode, the toilet was running, the wall under the shower on the left side of the room was damaged, there was an accumulation of dust on the inside of the air conditioning vent and duct. 3. In the soiled utility room on the Canterbury unit, the wall was damaged inside of entrance to the room, and there was a sink filled with standing dirty water. 4. The wall in the employee bathroom of the [NAME]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to honor resident's choice to sleep in and utilize a reclining chair for 1 of 7 reviewed for choices, Resident #138. The findings included: Review of Resident #138 medical records revealed the resident had multiple admissions with the latest admission on [DATE]. He has diagnoses that included Lymphedema, Chronic Systolic Congestive Heart Failure, Venous Insufficiency, Chronic Kidney Disease, Anxiety Disorder, Depression, Dyspnea, and Severe Morbid Obesity. His MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicting cognition is intact. Review of the physician Progress Notes on 09/12/24, with a service date of 09/10/24, revealed the physician documented the resident is not being compliant with elevating his legs during the day, but he is wearing compressive ACE wraps. He documented he has given up on trying to get a recliner chair for his room which would assist in elevating his legs. He was trying to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to promptly act on and resolve grievances voiced by residents and the Resident Council, for 8 of the residents interviewed, including Residents #113, #85, #143, #13, #122, #27, #95, and #60. Four of 4 residents in the Resident Council meeeting voiced food concerns that included Residents #85, #113, #116 and #135. The census at the time of the survey was 146. The findings included: Record review of Resident #113's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment documented Resident #113, with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. An interview was conducted on 09/09/24 at 10:17 AM with Resident #113, the Resident Council President, who when asked of any grievances that had not been resolved by the facility, replied that grievances related to food were ongoing and had not been resolved. During the interview, Resident #113 granted permission to this Surveyor to review Resident Council Meeting Minutes and Food Committee Meeting minutes. Record review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 sampled resident was free from physical restraint, Resident #128. The findings included: Review of the policy, titles, Identifying Seclusion and Unauthorized Restraint, revised 06/2023, documented, in part, As part of the abuse prevention strategy, volunteers, employees and contractors hired by this facility are expected to be able to identify involuntary seclusion and/or unauthorized restraint of residents. Unauthorized Physical Restraints: 1. Residents are free from the use of any physical restraints not required to treat their medical condition. 2. Physical restraint is defined as any manual method, physical or mechanical device, equipment, or material that meets all of the following criteria: a. Is attached or adjacent to a resident's body; b. Cannot be removed easily by the resident (in the same manner as it was applied by the staff); and c. Restricts the resident's freedom of movement or normal access to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate assessments for 2 of 42 sampled resident records reviewed, Residents #48 and #60, as evidenced for Resident #48 related to visual impairment and Resident #60 for use of antianxiety medications. The findings included: 1. Review of Resident #48 medical records revealed Resident #48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses tha included Heart Failure, Hypertension, Diabetes Mellitus, and Major Depressive Disorder. Review of the resident's care plan initiated and revised on 03/10/23 documented the resident is at risk for complications and impaired visual function related to dry eyes syndrome and complications of Diabetes. The interventions included to observe for and report to the nurse any complaints of eye discomfort / pain, any noted problems with or any complaints of change in eyesight. To report and document as needed (PRN) any signs or symptoms of acute eye problems: Change in ability to perform ADLs [Activity…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement care plans for 1 of 3 sampled residents related to behaviors reviewed for catheter, Resident #91, and the facility failed to develop and implement care plans to accurately account for vision deficit for 1 of 2 sampled residents reviewed for vision, Resident #48. The findings included: 1. Record review revealed Resident #91 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the resident's most recent full assessment, a Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed Resident #91 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 04, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Resident #91's diagnoses at the time of the assessment included: Heart Failure, Hypertension, Obstructive Uropathy, Diabetes Mellitus, Hemiplegia, History of cerebral infarction, Retention of urine, and Adult failure to thrive. Resident #91 was not interviewable. Review of Resident #91's orders included: On 01/06/24, Indwelling Urinary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to revise care plans for 2 of 9 sampled residents reviewed for nutrition and or medication use, Residents #81 and #79, as evidenced by the care plan for Resident #81 lacked information related to being aggressive toward others, and the care plan for Resident #79 noted the resident had a fluid restriction order that had been discontinued. The findings included: 1. Review of the record revealed Resident #81 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further review revealed the resident was moved to different rooms on 04/20/24 and 09/04/24 after a resident-to-resident altercation. Review of the current care plans lacked any documentation related to physical aggression or any resident-to-resident events or conflicts. During an interview on 09/12/24 at 2:01 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) agreed Resident #81 had had two resident-to-resident events and was surprised this was not noted in any of the care plans. During an interview on 09/12/24 at 2:32 PM, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, the facility failed to provide services of peri care and failed to get a resident out of bed as requested for 1 of 1 sampled resident, Resident #44, reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). The findings included: Clinical record review revealed Resident #44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included: medically complex conditions. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, reference date 09/03/24, recorded a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 14, indicating Resident #44 was cognitively intact. This MDS evidenced Resident #44 exhibited moods that included: Feeling down, depressed, or hopeless. Poor appetite or overeating. Feeling bad for herself - or that she is a failure or have let herself or her family down. This MDS also documented Resident #44 required substantial / maximal assistance with toileting hygiene, shower / bath self, and lower body dressing, and required partial / moderate assistance with upper body dressing. Additional review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and Hospice Agreement review, the facility failed to ensure coordination of care and services for 2 of 2 sampled residents, as evidenced by the lack of orders for Hospice services and oxygen use for Resident #25; and failure to coordinate the provision of an offloading boot, lack of Certificate of Terminal Illness (CTI) paperwork, and lack of current Hospice notes for Resident #87. The findings included: Review of the Hospice Agreement effective 01/15/24 documented, 6a. Patient admission Process: 1. ii. 3. Hospice shall notify Home, as appropriate, of patients being admitted to service, the day of the referral. Hospice shall provide copies of the Initial Hospice admission paperwork. 8. Coordination, Supervision and Evaluation of the Care/Service: . b. Home Responsibilities . iv. Home shall assist the Hospice in the coordination of patient care from admission up through and including discharge from service. 1) Review of the record revealed Resident #25 was admitted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to follow their fall prevention policy for initiating new interventions, updating care plans, and ensuring supervision to prevent falls for 1 of 4 sampled residents reviewed for accidents (Resident #128). The findings included: Review of the policy Falls - Managing, Preventing, and Documentation revised 01/2024 documented, Standard: Based on previous evaluations and current data, the staff will identify interventions related to the resident's specific risks and causes to try to prevent the resident from falling and to try to minimize complications from falling. Guideline: The resident's plan of care will be developed and followed accordingly to prevent or minimize the risk of falls or fall related injuries. Resident-Centered Approaches to Managing Falls and Fall Risk: 1. The staff will implement a resident-centered fall prevention plan to reduce the specific risk factor(s) of falls for each resident at risk or with a history…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to secure medication storage on 2 of 5 units, as evidenced by leaving the medication and treatment carts unlocked and unattended on the [NAME] Unit, the designated memory care unit, and a random observation of non-secured ointments on the [NAME] Unit. The findings included: 1) An observation on 09/09/24 at 11:43 AM revealed the medication cart was positioned against the wall in the common area of the [NAME] unit, unlocked with at least three bubble pack medication cards with pills in at least one pack, noted on top of the cart. Staff K, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) was noted at the desk on the other side of the common area, working on the computer. The LPN retrieved the bubble pack medication from the medication cart, but left the medication cart unlocked (Photographic Evidence Obtained). During the continued observation on 09/09/24 at 12:01 PM, both the medication cart and the treatment cart remained unlocked in the common area. Although three staff were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure complete and current medical records for 3 of 42 sampled residents (Resident #5, #26 and #81). The findings included: Review of the policy Documentation revised 01/2024 documented, Procedure: . 2. The following information is to be documented in the resident medical record: . c) Treatments or services performed; 1) During an observation on 09/09/24 at 10:41 AM, Resident #5 was noted with thick elongated toenails. The resident reported he had not been seen by a podiatrist. Review of the record revealed Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the electronic medical record lacked any documented podiatry services. During an interview on 09/12/24 at 4:44 PM, when asked about podiatry services for Resident #5, the Social Services Director (SSD) stated the resident had been seen by the podiatrist. When asked to locate and provide evidence of the services, the SSD was unable to locate any documented podiatry service…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0847 — isolated
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the client's Arbitration agreement and interview, the facility failed to ensure the arbitration agreement is explained to the resident or representative in a manner they understand, and had a signature from the resident if they agreed to the arbitration agreement, for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for Arbitration (Resident #149 and Resident #143). The findings included: During the initial entrance conference on 09/09/24 at 9:17 AM, the surveyor requested a list of residents who currently reside in the facility and entered into a binding arbitration agreement. On 09/11/24 Surveyor was given a list of residents that have a Y or a N next to their name. Surveyor chose three residents that were recently admitted to the facility with a high BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) to interview. A review of Resident #149 medical records revealed this resident is on the Rehab unit (SSU) and admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her 5-day Medicare MDS (Minimum Data Set) documents her BIMS (Brief Interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain a functioning call system for 1 of 26 sampled residents, Resident #27; and failed to maintain a call light in a manner to be accessible to the resident for 1 of 26 sampled residents, Resident #95. The findings included: 1. Record review revealed Resident #27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the resident's most recent complete assessment, a Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed Resident #27 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating cognitive was intact. During an interview with Resident #27, on 09/10/24 at 9:20 AM, and the surveyor requested Resident #27 to initiate the call system by pressing a button at the end of the call light cord. Resident #27 pressed the button and there was no light over the door to indicate that the resident had initiated the call light and no signal at the nurse' station to indicate that Resident #27 had initiated the call light. At the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, clean comfortable homelike environment for the residents. The findings included: A tour of the facility, including resident rooms, was conducted on 07/08/24 at 9:30 AM and a second tour was conducted on 07/10/24 on 12:00 PM, with the Maintenance Director and the Housekeeping Manager. They both acknowledged the following concerns that were identified had during tour: Photographic Evidence Obtained. a. room [ROOM NUMBER] A - The wheelchair arm rests, seat and back of chair were torn. b. room [ROOM NUMBER] - The floor was very dirty with debris that included the corners of the room. room [ROOM NUMBER] - The resident in bed-A stated on 07/08/24 at 9:55 AM that there had been an Ibuprofen pill on the floor that gets pushed around, which has been there a month, and it just gets moved around when they clean and mop. She said they don't clean the toilet and it is filthy with dried up bowel movement. She stataed she has told…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff followed physician orders for blood pressure medication perimeters for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #2) reviewed for medications; and failed to follow physician orders for a wound vac for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for a wound vac (Resident #4) The findings included: 1. Record review for Resident #2 revealed Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Hypertension (high blood pressure), Orthostatic Hypotention, Atrial Fibrillation, and History of Falling, Review of the physician orders revealed the following orders: a) Dilltiazem HCl Oral Tablet 30 MG to give 0.5 tablet by mouth every 6 hours for Hypertension. Hold if SBP(Systolic Blood Pressure) is less than 105 or HR (Heart Rate) is less than 60 (0000-midnight, 6:00 AM, 12:00 PM, and 6:00 PM). b) Metoprolol Succinate ER Tablet Extended Release 24 Hour 25 MG Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for Hypertension. Hold for SBP [Systolic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure interdisciplinary team (IDT) participation in care planning process for 7 of 32 sampled residents, to include food and nutrition services, activities, and therapy, as applicable involving Residents #6, #22, #41, #106, #111, #5, and #8. The findings included: On 07/13/23 during the afternoon, Staff B, Minimum Data Set (MDS) Coordinator, provided requested evidence of interdisciplinary team (IDT) participation in the care planning process for numerous resident's in the survey sample, as the electronic medical record lacked current participation records. An overview of the provided Quality Resident Review Worksheet & Attendance Records, the forms utilized by the facility to document participation in the care planning process, revealed numerous blanks where the signatures of dietary, activities and therapy staff were to be recorded. The MDS Coordinator confirmed the Registered Dietician was only in the building once weekly, and also agreed someone…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility staff failed to speak to 4 of 32 sampled residents in a dignified manner, related to toileting and care, use of cell phones by staff during care, and staff speaking in foreign language during care, Residents #21, #22, #41, and #109. The findings included: 1. Review of the record revealed Resident #21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and moved to her current room on 07/19/22. Review of the current Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/30/23, documented Resident #21 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, on a 0 to 15 scale, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. This MDS also documented the resident did not exhibit any behaviors, and needed the extensive to total assistance from staff for all Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), except eating. This MDS documented locomotion on the unit only occurred once or twice during the seven-day look back period. During an interview on 07/10/23 at 11:04 AM, Resident #21…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-13 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure baths and showers for 2 of 5 sampled residents were provided as per facility schedule and resident request, Resident #22 and #100. The findings included: 1. Review of the record revealed Resident #22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the current MDS assessment dated [DATE], documented the resident had a BIMS score of 10, on a 0 to 15 scale, indicating he had some cognitive impairment. This MDS documented the resident had no behaviors, and that he needed the total assistance of one person for bathing. This MDS also documented it was very important for the resident to choose between a bath and a shower. During an interview on 07/10/23 at 3:12 PM, Resident #22 and his wife were discussing their concerns with the slow or no response by staff, resulting in the resident having incontinent episodes. The resident's wife stated, They don't like giving showers. You have to beg for them. You always get the yes, yes, yes, but nothing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services to maintain a clean, comfortable and homelike environment for 3 of 5 units (Units 100, 200, and 500); and failed to maintain the residents' call lights to be accessible to the residents, for 4 of 53 sampled residents reviewed, Residents #64, #46, #4 and #85. The findings included: 1. Observations on 07/13/23 at approximately 1:00 PM, accompanied with the Director of Maintenance, revealed the following: In room [ROOM NUMBER], the room floors were dirty, the bed linens on the window-bed were stained, there was no toilet seat on the commode, there was an accumulation of trash on the floor, and the commode was not in proper working order. As reported by the residents, the toilet would 'fill up with water and then go down really slow'. In room [ROOM NUMBER], the privacy curtain between the beds was stained, there was an accumulation of residue and debris on the floor and the sink in the shared…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to initiate a new wound care physician order in a timely manner for 1 of 3 sampled residents reviewed for facility-acquired pressure ulcers, Resident #33. The findings included: The policy, titled, Prevention of Pressure Ulcers/ Injuries and revised on 07/17, documented, in part: Review the interventions and strategies for effectiveness on an ongoing basis. Resident #33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Alzheimer's Disease, Type 2 diabetes, history of falls, Atrial Fibrillation, Tremors, Glaucoma, Hyperlipidemia, and muscle wasting with atrophy. The record documented the resident had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 3 of 15, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. On 07/10/23 at 11:53 AM, a telephone interview was conducted with the spouse of Resident #33 to review his care at the facility. She stated her husband has a pressure ulcer on his left heel and she was the one who identified it. She stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-13 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician dietary orders and recommendations for obtaining weights for 3 of 5 sampled residents reviewed for nutrition, Residents #120, #111 and #123, that resulted in significant weight loss for Residents #111 and #123. The findings included: The facility's policy, titled, 'Weight Assessment and Intervention', revised September 2022, documented, in part: Weight Assessment 1. The nursing staff will measure resident weight on admission. If no weight concerns are noted at this point, weights will be measured monthly thereafter. 2. Any weight change of 5% or more since the last weight assessment will be retaken as soon as practical usually within the next day for confirmation. If the weight is verified, nursing will communicate with the Dietitian. 3. The Dietitian will review the Weight Record to follow individual weight trends over time. Negative trends will be evaluated by the treatment team whether or not the criteria for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-13 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to respond to 1 of 1 sampled residents reviewed for vocalization of significant pain which resulted in harm, Resident #36. The findings included: The facility policy, titled, Pain Assessment and Management, documents in part: 2) Pain management is defined as the process for alleviating the resident's pain to a level that is acceptable to the resident and is based on his or clinical condition and established treatment goals. 3)d address the underlying cause of the pain Resident #36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with documented diagnosis to include Dementia, unspecified severity with other behavioral disturbance, history of falling, Osteoarthritis, personal history of Covid 19, and Dysphagia. The resident had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 3 of 15, which indicates severe cognitive impairment. Record review of the nursing progress notes for Resident #36 documented on 03/10/23 at 1:03 PM that the resident 'has been in bed all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-13 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure care and services for 1 of 1 sample resident receiving dialysis, as evidenced by a lack of consistent documentation of coordination between the nursing and dialysis facility; failure to ensure documented pre and post weights to monitor for fluid overload; and failure to inform the physician and/or family of the resident's refusal of dialysis services, Resident #6. The findings included: Review of the record revealed Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #6 received dialysis services from an outside facility every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. Dialysis treatment records were noted as part of the record to ensure communication between the two facilities. Review of the record lacked any communication documentation from the dialysis facility for the month of June 2023, and only included one note dated 07/10/23 for the month of July 2023. On 07/12/23 at 1:30 PM, Staff R, Unit Manager, explained the documented communication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-13 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders for 2 of 2 sampled residents with physician ordered fluid restrictions, Residents #22 and 120. The findings included: The facility's policy, titled, 'Fluid Restrictions' documented, in part: Policy Interpretation and Implementation 1). When a physician prescribes a fluid restriction, a communication form notifying the Fod and Nutrition Services department will be completed. 2). If the resident is receiving liquid nourishments for nutritional support. 3). If no clarification of liquid nourishment provided is obtained the liquid nourishment shall be included in the total fluids administered. 4). Water pitchers will be removed from the resident's room. Beverage preferences will be obtained by Food and Nutrition Services designee if possible and reflected on the resident's meal ticket/tray card. 5). Jell-O, ice cream, soup and anything at room temperature that becomes liquid, will be calculated and included in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2024-09-13 · tag F0732 — pattern
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure timely posting of nurse staffing information on 4 of 5 day during the survey (Monday 09/09/24 through Thursday 09/12/24). The finding included: On 09/09/24 at 8:40 AM, upon entrance to the facility the nurse staffing information, that included the number of Registered Nurses, Licensed Practical Nurses, and Certified Nursing Assistants, along with the actual hours worked by each category, was not posted in the lobby area. At 9:09 AM a walk-through of the facility was conducted, to include a second observation of the lobby area and all units in the main building, and no nurse staffing information was found. Upon arrival to the facility on [DATE] at 8:30 AM, the nurse staffing information for 09/09/24 was noted in the lobby on the receptionist desk (Photographic Evidence Obtained). When asked who was responsible for the posting, the staff sitting at the receptionist desk stated, I'm really not sure, but (name of Administrator) has something to do…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ASTON HEALTH — 38 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.7-0.7 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.2-0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.1≈ chain avg
The other 37 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.7★, per CMS)
1 of 5Crescent Health And Rehabilitation CenterSarasota, FL 1 of 5Kensington Gardens Rehab And Nursing CenterClearwater, FL 1 of 5Nursing & Rehabilitation Center Of New Port RicheyNew Port Richey, FL 1 of 5Oak Haven Rehab And Nursing CenterAuburndale, FL 1 of 5Sea Breeze Rehab And Nursing CenterVero Beach, FL 2 of 5Baya Pointe Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterLake City, FL 2 of 5Capri Health And Rehabilitation CenterVenice, FL 2 of 5Creekside Health And Rehabilitation CenterSarasota, FL 2 of 5Fairway Oaks CenterTampa, FL 2 of 5Flagler Health And Rehabilitation CenterBunnell, FL 2 of 5Haines City Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterHaines City, FL 2 of 5Highlands Lake CenterLakeland, FL 2 of 5Indian River CenterWest Melbourne, FL 2 of 5North Port Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterNorth Port, FL 2 of 5Pensacola Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterPensacola, FL 2 of 5Riverwood CenterJacksonville, FL 2 of 5Sandgate Gardens Rehab And Nursing CenterFort Pierce, FL 2 of 5Tierra Pines CenterLargo, FL 2 of 5Viera Del Mar Health And Rehabilitation CenterViera, FL 2 of 5Winter Garden Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterWinter Garden, FL 3 of 5Cedarbrook Health And Rehabilitation CenterFort Myers, FL 3 of 5Coquina CenterOrmond Beach, FL 3 of 5Eagleridge Health And Rehabilitation CenterFort Myers, FL 3 of 5Fouraker Hills Rehab And Nursing CenterJacksonville, FL 3 of 5Hillside Health And Rehabilitation CenterZephyrhills, FL 3 of 5Oakpark Health And Rehabilitation CenterPalm Harbor, FL 4 of 5Bridgeview CenterOrmond Beach, FL 4 of 5Coastal Health And Rehabilitation CenterDaytona Beach, FL 4 of 5Debary Health And Rehabilitation CenterDebary, FL 4 of 5Fernandina Beach Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterFernandina Beach, FL 4 of 5Island Lake CenterLongwood, FL 4 of 5Meadowpark Health And Rehabilitation CenterDunedin, FL 4 of 5Parkside Health And Rehabilitation CenterDeland, FL 4 of 5Ruleme CenterEustis, FL 4 of 5Seaside Health And Rehabilitation CenterDaytona Beach, FL 5 of 5Bayview CenterEustis, FL 5 of 5Osprey Point Nursing CenterBushnell, FL

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
VERO BEACH OPCO HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 10/18/2021
WILDES, DONNAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF—since 08/28/2025
BALLOUT, HUSSIENIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF—since 04/30/2026
BENJAMIN, BERNARDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF—since 06/05/2026
KITCHEN, TIFFANYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL—since 12/29/2025
WASHINGTON, MARQUITAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL—since 02/18/1984
ASTON HEALTHCARE LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNF—since 01/01/2022

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$14.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-4.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.9M
Related-party expense18% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 69%Medicare 15%Other / private 16%

This home reported $2.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$331per resident / day
operating cost
$10,072per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$316per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Florida
$10,342/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,610/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-09-01 — CMS provider number 105474. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next