Fouraker Hills Rehab And Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 78 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 50.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 59 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 50% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 116.6 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.42 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.39 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.06 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.09 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.55 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.43 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2021-07-16 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to implement abuse policies and procedures for an independently ambulatory resident with known aggressive behaviors, and a history of abusing another resident (Resident #28). On 7/12/21, the facility's census was 89 residents. All 89 residents were at risk for serious injury, serious harm, impairment, or death as a result of the deficient practice. Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) at a scope and severity of J (isolated) began on January 13, 2021, and was identified on July 15, 2021 at 1:30 PM, which was on-going. On July 15, 2021 at 8:45 PM, the Administrator was notified of the IJ determination. The findings include: Cross Reference to F689, F726, and F867 A review of the medical record for Resident #28 revealed an admission date of 11/11/18. Medical diagnoses included major depressive disorder, dementia, and psychotic disorder. The resident received hospice services for a diagnosis of cerebral atherosclerosis. A Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2021-07-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Assigned to [NAME] Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained free of accident hazards as is possible, and each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 4 of 43 residents sampled, Residents #22, #28, #67 and #192. The findings include: Record review revealed that Resident #28 was admitted into the facility on [DATE], with the last re-admission on [DATE]. The diagnoses included Unspecified Dementia without Behavioral Disturbance, Major Depressive Disorder, Other Psychotic Disorder not due to a Substance or known physiological Condition, Heart Failure, Chronic Kidney Disease, Stage 2 (Mild), and Repeated Falls Orders included Psychiatrist Evaluation and treatment; Behavior Evaluation; Hospice for palliative care; Furosemide 20 mg by mouth daily; Trazodone HCL 50 mg by mouth three times a day; Acetaminophen 325 mg 2 tablets daily twice a day; and Seroquel 50 mg by mouth three times a day. Review…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to, receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely for five (Residents #64, #75, #14, #65, and #10) residents in five (rooms 204, 205, 208, 510, and 512) of 66 resident rooms, and in three (Halls 100, 500, and 200) of four hallways in the facility. The findings include: This is a single-story facility where the residents are housed on two units, MSU and Palms. A tour of the facility was conducted on 1/13/2025 at 10:30 a.m. During a tour of the MSU unit several of the baseboards were pulled away from the walls on the 100 and 500 hallways. Miscellaneous stains were observed on various areas of the laminated floors in the main hallways leading to resident rooms. Also, several walls in the hallways and in resident rooms were highly stained with chipped/tearing paint and/or in need of repair. Live roaches were observed in room…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-16 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
  Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility was free of pests and rodents in five (rooms 204, 205, 208, 510, and 512) of 66 resident rooms. Failure to correct this concern in a timely manner could negatively impact the the entire census of 105 residents. The findings include: This is a single-story facility where the residents are housed on two units, MSU and Palms. A tour of the facility was conducted on 1/13/2025 at 10:30 a.m. During a tour of the MSU unit, Live roaches were observed in room [ROOM NUMBER]. (Photographic Evidence Obtained) The tour continued on the Palms Unit. On this unit live roaches were observed resident room numbers 204, 205, and 208. Live roaches, spider webs, and dead roaches were observed on the floor behind Resident #64's (room [ROOM NUMBER]W) bed. (Photographic Evidence Obtained) During an interview on 1/13/2025 at 11:41 a.m. with Resident #75 (room [ROOM NUMBER]D), dead roaches were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and a review of resident records, the facility failed to ensure the MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment was completed accurately for one (Resident #14) of one resident reviewed for communication, from a total survey sample of 34 residents. The findings include: On 1/13/2025 at 1:22 p.m., Resident #14 was observed lying in bed with her eyes closed with a blanket held up just below her chin. A nasal cannula (a device that provides additional oxygen through the nose) was in place, and the overhead light was on. She was greeted directly in a normal tone but did not respond. Speaking up, while standing closer, a second attempt to greet her was made with no response. Moving closer to Resident #14, by her left side, she was greeted a third time. She appeared startled and asked loudly, What? Who is that? You'll have to speak up. I'm blind and I can't hear well. When asked if she had hearing aids, she reported no but she would like them. When asked if she had spoken…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
  Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, medical record review, and facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to ensure that one (Resident #14) of four residents reviewed for ADLs, from 34 residents in the total survey sample, received necessary services to maintain grooming and personal hygiene. Resident #14 did not receive routine or scheduled showers, her hair was matted, and there was an offensive odor present. The findings include: On 1/13/2025 at 1:22 p.m., Resident #14, whose room was located on the MSU unit, was observed lying in bed with her eyes closed and her blanket held up just below her chin. Her hair was matted down along her face and was greasy in appearance, and there was a strong, foul, tangy odor present. There were approximately five small, black gnats observed flying closely on the left side of her body. She was asked when she had her last bath/shower. Resident #14 reported that she had not had a shower in more than 10 days. When asked who assisted her with showers, she reported, the CNAs (certified nursing assistants). On 1/14/2025…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0685 — isolated
  Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and a review of resident records, the facility failed to ensure that one (Resident #14) of two residents reviewed for vision/hearing/communication, from a total survey sample of 34 residents, received proper treatment and assistive devices to maintain hearing ability. Resident #14 was very hard of hearing, which compromised her ability to communicate. The facility had a visiting audiologist; however, the resident had not been referred for an evaluation. The findings include: On 1/13/2025 at 1:22 p.m., Resident #14 was observed lying in bed with her eyes closed and a blanket held up just below her chin. A nasal cannula (a device that provides additional oxygen through the nose) was in place, and the overhead light was on. She was greeted directly in a normal tone, but did not respond. Speaking up, while standing closer, a second attempt to greet her was made with no response. Moving closer to Resident #14, by her left side, she was greeted a third time. She…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-07-16 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, medical record review, and facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from any significant medication errors, by failing to administer medications within the specified timeframe based on physicians' scheduling orders for four (Residents #1, #2, #3, and #6) of six sampled residents, from a total census of 111. Failure to administer medications in a timely manner can result in a resident's inability to maintain the proper level of medication in the bloodstream to be effective; reduced functional ability; lower quality of life; hospitalization, disease progression, and/or death. The findings include: On 7/15/24 at 9:30 AM, the administrator was requested to provide a copy of current Quality Assurance and Performance Improve (QAPI)/Performance Improvement Project (PIP) being conducted at the facility. On 7/15/24 at 4:30 PM, facility staff provided a copy of an Inservice Education that was given to nursing staff on 7/10/24 regarding Medication Administration policy and procedure. There was not an ongoing performance…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-12 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, medical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to 1) ensure privacy and confidentiality of medical records for three (Residents #4, #5, and #6) of 10 resident records reviewed, and 2) failed to ensure personal privacy during wound care for one (Resident #2) of two residents reviewed for wound care, from a total sample of 24 residents. The findings include: 1. On 1/11/24 at 10:40 AM, the staffing board in the hallway on the MSU (Medical Surgical Unit) across from the nurse's station was observed to identify two residents (Residents #4 and #6) as having medical appointments. The day and time of the appointment was listed along with one of the doctors name. (Photographic evidence obtained) The board also displayed Discharge Resident #5 Friday with the resident's full name on the board. The information could be seen by residents and guests passing along the hallway. During a second observation on 1/12/24 at 6:30 AM, the staffing board on the MSU continued to display Discharge Resident #5 Friday with the resident's full…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-01-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, medical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain standard precautions designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for four (Residents #2, #19, #7, and #3) of four residents reviewed for tube feeding, from a total of 24 residents in the sample. The findings include: 1. On 1/11/24 at 10:51 am, Resident #2, a resident who receives gastrostomy tube feedings, had a tube feeding syringe observed in a Styrofoam cup with no date on syringe, cup, or packaging. This cup was observed next to a urinal on the bedside table, the cup and urinal were observed to be in physical contact with each other. (Photographic evidence obtained) On 1/12/24 at 8:43 am, Resident #2 was observed to have a tube feeding syringe on his nightstand table with no date on the packaging or the syringe. The packaging had do not throw away written on it. (Photographic evidence obtained) On 1/12/24 at 8:45 am, the Director of Nursing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-01-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, medical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to 1) ensure each resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices regarding wound care for two (Residents #2 and #11) of three residents reviewed for wound care, from a total of 24 residents in the sample, and 2) failed to ensure quality of care, a fundamental principle that applies to all treatment and care provided to facility residents, by not performing regular control solution testing for five of five glucometers used for residents blood glucose monitoring. The findings include: 1. On 1/11/24 at 10:50 am, Resident #2 was observed lying in bed awake, with a visitor at his bedside who identified herself as the resident's sister. His left foot was wrapped in a bulky ace wrap. When asked if he had a wound on his left foot. He stated, I had my toes amputated. When asked how often he has wound…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, medical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the residents received adequate supervision to prevent accidents, by failing to supervise residents on the smoking patio for two (Residents #8 and #9) of fifteen residents identified as smokers, from a total of 24 residents in the sample. The findings include: On 1/12/24 at 6:05 am, two residents (Residents #8 and #9) were observed in the designated smoking area, each in a wheelchair, without staff present. Each of the two residents removed a pack of cigarettes and a lighter from their pockets and lit their respective cigarettes. Resident #8 was asked his name, he replied and also provided the name of Resident #9, stating, He can't talk. Resident #8 was asked if they usually come outside to smoke without staff. He stated, Yes. When asked if he was considered a safe smoker. He stated, Yes. When he was asked if the lady (Resident #10, who was observed outside but not smoking) also smoked with them. He stated, No, she needs staff out here, and she has to wear one of those…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ASTON HEALTH — 38 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 22% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL