Fairway Oaks Center
13806 N 46th St, Tampa, FL 33613 · For profit - Individual · 120 certified beds · (813) 977-4214 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- a high number of inspection citations overall (33) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (62%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- about 23% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
- its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 8.9% | 8.7% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 15.3% | 5.5% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.7% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 4.6% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.4% | 2.5% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 8.7% | 9.5% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 15.2% | 14.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 99.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 7.0% | 4.5% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 16.8% | 10.5% | 21.2% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 16.7% | 8.6% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.2% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.4% | 94.7% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 29.0% | 26.1% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 13.3% | 9.1% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.20 | 2.13 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.86 | 1.15 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
40.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 111 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 39.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 102 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 55% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 40.6%CMS range 31.2–50.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 14.1%CMS range 10.4–16.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 39.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 36.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 28.4% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 98.8% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 94.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.6% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 5.2% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.3%CMS range 5.0–11.0 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.99 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 104.8 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.59 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.60 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.15 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.26 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.72 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.70 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 62% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
33 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received assistance with showers for three residents (#4, #3 and #2) out of four residents reviewed.Findings included: 1. During a facility tour on 2/21/2026 at 9:40 a.m., Resident #4 was observed in her room. The resident stated had not had a shower since she was admitted to this facility. She stated she had been assisted with one bed bath, upon admission, not sure exactly. Review of Resident #4's admission record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include hypertensive heart disease without heart failure, unsteadiness of the feet, other gait abnormalities, need for assistance with personal care and blindness of left eye. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #4 dated 2/8/2026 revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 meaning the resident was cognitively intact. Review of the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) task log for showers…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to maintain complete and accurately documented medical records for one (#2) of four sampled residents related to not completing the Admission/readmission evaluation in a timely manner, not completing a daily note for a resident receiving specialized services and skilled nursing. Findings included: Review of Resident #2s admission Record showed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses not limited to other artificial openings of urinary tract status, retroperitoneal fibrosis, stage 4 (severe) chronic kidney disease, unsteadiness on feet (for therapy use), generalized muscle weakness (for therapy use), need for assistance with personal care (for therapy use), and oropharyngeal phase dysphagia (for therapy use). Review of Resident #2s assessments showed an Admission/readmission Nursing Evaluation, dated 1/30/26 at 5:41 p.m. was not completed and locked. The documentation showed sections a, l and n were unsigned by staff member. Section a (A) did…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to ensure one (#2) of four residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of nursing, physician orders, and person-centered care plan.Findings included: Review of Resident #2's February Medication Administration Record revealed an order dated 1/30/26 instructing staff to obtain vital signs every shift for 5 days. The order ended after vital signs had been obtained on the 3 p.m. - 11 p.m. shift on 2/4/26. The review revealed the following blood pressure (bp), temperature (temp), pulse, respiration (resp), and 02 saturation (sat):2/1/26 7:00 a.m. - 3:00 p.m.: bp 115/62, temp 97.8, pulse 85, resp 20, and O2 sat 97%.2/1/26 3:00 p.m. - 11:00 p.m.: bp 115/62, temp 97.8, pulse 85, resp 20, and O2 sat 97%.2/1/26 11:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m.: bp 121/67, temp 98, pulse 78, resp 18, O2 sat 98%.2/2/26 3:00 p.m. - 11:00 p.m.: bp 121/67, temp 98, pulse 78, resp 18, O2 sat 98%.2/3/26 3:00 p.m. - 11:00 p.m.: bp 119/88, temp 98.3, pulse 60,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-21 · tag F0840 — isolatedEmploy or obtain outside professional resources to provide services in the nursing home when the facility does not employ a qualified professional to furnish a required service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure outside resources were available for two residents (#4 and #3) out of two residents sampled, related to podiatry visit for Resident #4, and dermatology services for Resident #3.Findings included: 1. During a facility tour on 2/21/2026 at 9:40 a.m., Resident #4 was observed in her room. The resident stated she had notified the nurse she had long nails and she was not able to cut them herself. She stated they were uncomfortable but not painful. Resident #4 stated the nurse said she would see a podiatrist.Review of Resident #4's admission record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include hypertensive heart disease without heart failure, unsteadiness of the feet, other gait abnormalities, need for assistance with personal care and blindness of left eye. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #4 dated 2/8/2026 revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, meaning…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide activities of daily living (ADLs) related to grooming and personal hygiene care for three dependent residents (#4, #6, and #7) out of three sampled residents. Findings included:Review of Resident #4 admission Record revealed an admission to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses of bullous pemphigoid, dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, anxiety, adult failure to thrive, muscle weakness and other reduced mobility.An interview was conducted on 11/20/2025 at 9:50 am via telephone with Resident #4's family member (fm). The fm stated having raised concerns and spoke with staff at the facility about Resident #4's overgrown fingernails and residents' nails not being cut down. A grievance was filed by Resident #4's family member 7/7/2025 with the facility regarding concerns with ADL care and Resident #4's nails. The facility noted in the grievance follow-up that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident representative was notified prior to the resident's transfer for one resident (#2) of three residents reviewed for discharge.Findings Included: Review of Resident #2's Minimum Data Set (MDS), with a target date of 7/23/25, Section C, Cognitive Patterns, showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 00. This BIMS score indicated severe cognitive impairment. The resident's representative was a family member.On 11/20/2025 at 12:51 a.m., an interview was conducted with the Social Service Director (SSD). The SSD stated there is no discharge note or documentation notifying the representative. She said consent was not provided by the representative.On 11/20/2025 at 1:31 p.m., an interview was conducted with the NHA. He confirmed he does not have any paperwork showing the representative gave consent.Review of the Nursing Home Transfer and Discharge Notice with a notice date of 7/21/2025 and an effective date of 8/19/2025, revealed the form did not list the transfer location for the resident. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, and interviews the facility failed to maintain complete clinical records for one resident (#5) of five sampled residents which were accurately documented, readily accessible, and systematically organized.Findings included:Review of Resident #5's admission Record showed the resident was admitted on [DATE]. The record included diagnoses not limited to hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, aphasia following cerebral infarction, unspecified systemic lupus erythematosus, not having achieved remission myeloid leukemia, and need for assistance with personal care. The record showed the resident's family member was an emergency contact proxy.Review of Resident #5's 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], showed the resident scored 3 of 15 on a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) indicating a severe cognitive impairment.Review of the facility incident log showed Resident #5 had falls on 10/15/25 at 11:30 a.m. and 10/22/25 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure two of two community shower rooms were cleaned and maintained. Findings included: On 09/08/2024 at 8:55 a.m. an observation was made of the community shower room at the end of the hall between the 100-200 rooms hallway. Entry into the shower room revealed the door to the shower room was not locked. Upon entry into the shower room an observation was made of spots of a brown substance on the floor in front of the sink vanity. Observation was made of spots of the same brown substance in the middle of the floor of the shower room and in the doorway which led into the stall with the toilet. A yellow dirty linen bin was observed inside of the shower room to the left of the door. The lid to the dirty linen bin was on the floor beside the bin. In the stall with the toilet a cabinet was observed on the wall and inside of the cabinet was a spray bottle with a label indicating it was a bottle filled with a cleaning solution. The cabinet had a lock on it, but the cabinet was not locked and a key for the cabinet was not observed.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-11 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure wheelchair mobility was provided for one (#7) of eight residents sampled. Finding Included: During multiple observations made on 09/08/2024, 09/09/2024, 09/10/2024 and 9/11/2024 at multiple times 10:00 a.m., 3:00 p.m., and 5:00 p.m., Resident #7 was observed lying down in bed with her call light within reach Review of an admission record showed Resident #7 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but not limited to dysphagia following cerebral infarction, unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance. Review of a Minimum Data Set, (MDS) dated [DATE] showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status, BIMS score of 00, which indicated interview was not able to be conducted. Further review of the MDS section GG- showed Resident # 7 used a wheelchair for mobility. Review of a care plan focus for Activity of Daily Living (ADL) initiated on 09/10/2024,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-11 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide two (#76 and #82) of forty-six sampled residents with privacy during two of four days observed. Findings included: 1. On 9/8/2024 at 10:00 a.m., the 100 hall was toured and observed. The 100/200 hall was a very high trafficked hall where staff, residents and visitors pass through. The hall was busy with housekeeping staff, direct care staff, residents ambulating/self propelling, nurses and other departmental staff. Upon reaching Resident #76's room, it was observed her room door was all the way open and she was noted lying flat in bed, on top of the bed linen and with her head over bed approximately twenty-five degrees. Further observations revealed she was wearing a hospital gown. Resident #76's hospital gown was observed pulled up all the way to her waste and she was observed totally nude. There did not appear to be any clothing on the floor, bed, nor was there any evidence of any pull up briefs at or around the bed. Resident #76 resided in the (door) bed and both the door and the privacy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 23 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-11 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure timely and accurate Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) for one (#73) of 23 sampled residents. Findings Included: 2. Review of the admission Record for Resident #73 showed the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a re-entry admission date of 03/04/2024. Admitting diagnoses included schizoaffective disorder bipolar type, major depressive disorder, dementia, mood disorder due to known physiological condition with depressive features. Review of Level I PASRR for Resident #73 dated 03/16/2022, revealed an incomplete PASRR with the qualifying diagnoses of depression, mood disorder and dementia not indicated. During an interview on 09/11/2024 at 9:45 a.m. with Staff S, Registered Nurse (RN) Minimum Data Set (MDS) Director, she said the facility's process for identifying a resident with a possible MD, ID or related condition prior to admission to the facility would start with the Admissions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop a care plan for one (#45) of six residents sampled for skin conditions and failed to develop and implement an Activities of Daily Living care plan for two ( #44 and #51) of five residents sampled. Finding Included: 1 During an observation made on 09/08/24 at 02:20 p.m., Resident # 45 was observed lying down in bed dressed in a hospital grown from the morning until late in the afternoon. The resident was trying to say something but was not able to communicate. On 09/09/2024 at 11:00 a.m., Resident # 45 was observed lying down in bed dressed in his hospital grown. Resident #45's legs was observed with scabs leaking with yellow fluid on his right and left legs. Review of an admission Record showed Resident # 45 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses to include but not limited to Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, psoriasis vulgaria, lymphedema, not elsewhere classified. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) for dependent residents which included performing fingernail care and showers for two (#44 and #51) of 46 sampled residents. Findings included: 1. An interview was conducted on 09/08/2024 at 09:50 a.m. with Resident #44. She was observed to be in bed, with a hospital gown on, hair was disheveled and unkempt. Resident #44 said she did not know when the last time she got a shower was, but she wanted a shower to wash her hands. Her fingernails were observed to extend past her fingertips with a dark brown, black substances under her bilateral nails. The resident said she had not had her fingernails cut and she does not like them long. Her right hand was observed to be curled into her palm and the resident pulled her fingers out and there was a red indented mark on her palm where her nail was resting in her palm. On 09/09/2024 at 10:01 a.m. Resident #44 was observed in her bed, hair disheveled, her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide quality care and services according to standards of practice related to medication administration and skin care treatment for one (#45) of three residents reviewed for wound care. Finding included: During an observation made on 09/08/24 at 02:20 p.m., Resident #45 was observed lying down in bed dressed in a hospital grown from the morning until the late in the afternoon. Resident was trying to say something but was not able to communication. During an observation made on 09/09/2024 at 11:00 a.m., Resident #45 was observed lying down in bed dressed in his hospital grown. Resident #45 legs was observed with scabs leaking with yellow fluid on his right and left legs. During an interview on 09/10/2024 at 1:00 pm with Resident #45's representative, he stated [the resident] had been at the facility for a year. He was being seen by a vascular surgeon because the facility thought he could have cancer in his legs. He said the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-11 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide indwelling urinary catheter care and services to prevent leakage and breaks in tubing for two (#82 and #13) of ten sampled residents during two of two days observed (9/8/2024 and 9/9/2024). Findings included: 1. On 9/8/2024 at 10:45 a.m., Resident #82 was observed seated in her wheelchair and was slowly self propelling down the hall from her room. An attempt to interview the resident revealed she had cognition deficits and was only able to answer some simple yes and no questions. She kept saying, I just want to go back to my room, I want to go to bed. Passing staff told her, ok, in a minute, but we have lunch soon. Further observations revealed when the resident was self propelling in her wheelchair down the hallway, she was noted with an indwelling urinary catheter. The catheter bag was observed appropriately hanging under the seat of the wheelchair. However, the tubing from the bag to the resident was observed in excess slack,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-11 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure trauma informed care was provided for one (#39) of one resident with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The facility did not ensure PTSD triggers were on Resident #39's care plan. The facility did not ensure staff was trained annually on trauma informed care as the facility policy indicated. Findings Included: Review of admission Record showed Resident #39 was initially admitted to the facility diagnoses which included major depressive disorder, schizoaffective disorder, unspecified psychosis, post-traumatic stress disorder, other specified persistent mood disorders, anxiety disorder, dementia. Review of Resident #39's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], Section C-Cognitive Patterns, showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 which indicated intact cognition. Review of Resident #39's Care Plan dated revealed the following: A focus area initiated on 7/24/24 showed, the resident had experienced a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-11 · tag F0732 — isolatedPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide residents and visitors with up to date and correct daily staffing posting information. It was determined the facility had not updated this sheet for a total of three days. Findings included: On 9/8/2024 at 8:33 a.m., an observation was made of the facility's entrance lobby. A desk in the lobby area was observed with a stand up clear plastic document holder. The holder had encased a Daily Staffing Projection sheet. The sheet had information with the date, how many nurses and how many Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) were working for each of the three shifts, and the resident census. The sheet showed a date of 9/5/2024, which was three days prior to the current date reviewed, 9/8/2024. The sheet had not been updated to reflect the current date, the current staffing numbers per each of the three shifts, or the current resident census. The sheet reflected a resident census of 104. An interview with the Front Desk receptionist revealed she was aware of the form because it was at her desk area. However,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-11 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure the medication error rate was less than 5% for three (#14, #93, #498) of four sampled residents who were administered medications. This resulted in seven errors from 35 medication administration opportunities for a medication error rate of 20.00%. Findings included: 1. On 09/10/2024 at 9:55 a.m., Resident #498 was observed sitting in her room. Staff U, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) was observed passing medications. Verified a total of 9 medications were in the medication cup The following medications were observed as administered to Resident #498: Aspirin delayed release 81 mg (milligrams) daily for DVT prophylaxis (deep vein thrombosis) Cefuroxime Axetil 500 mg two times a day for pneumonia for 2 days Ventolin HFA inhalation Aerosol Solution 108 mcg/ACT (microgram/actuation) 1 puff three times a day for COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) Glimepiride 1 mg by mouth in the morning for Diabetes Iron 325 mg daily for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1. the medical record contained accurate and complete documentation for three (#498, #93, #14) of 46 sampled residents related to bathing and for one (#51) of four sampled residents related to medication administration. Findings included: 1. On 09/10/2024 at 9:55 a.m. ,Resident #498 was observed sitting in her room. Staff U, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) was observed passing medications. Verified a total of 9 medications in the medication cup The following medications were observed as administered to Resident #498: Aspirin delayed release 81 mg (milligrams) daily for DVT prophylaxis (deep vein thrombosis) Cefuroxime Axetil 500 mg two times a day for pneumonia for 2 days Ventolin HFA inhalation Aerosol Solution 108 mcg/ACT (microgram/actuation) 1 puff three times a day for COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) Glimepiride 1 mg by mouth in the morning for Diabetes Iron 325 mg daily for supplement Lasix 40 mg give daily for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-11 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide Abuse/Neglect training to one (Staff X) of 10 employees reviewed. Findings Included: During an interview on 09/10/2024 4:30 p.m. the Director of Nursing (DON) stated Resident #100 had a lower BIMS score, and frequently wandered around the building. He stated on 03/14/2024 his Assistant Director or Nursing (ADON) and the Unit Manager (Staff G, Licensed Practical Nurse [LPN]), came and let him know that Resident #100's Resident Representative (RR) was reporting an allegation of neglect. The DON stated he went to Resident #100's room to speak with the family. He stated the family reported to him when they came in to visit Resident #100 on 03/13/2024 during the night, they found the resident in two briefs, the resident had a hospital gown on top of her clothes and was tucked in underneath her, the resident's hands were bound behind her, and that the resident's TV was not working. The DON stated once he spoke with the family, he went and notified the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and their regional. He stated when…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations of abuse to include physical restraints were reported to the State Survey Agency for 1 (#100) out of 23 residents sampled. Findings included: Review of Resident #100's admission Record revealed she was originally admitted to the facility in 2020 with medical diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, diabetes mellitus, non-Alzheimer's dementia, delusional disorders, chronic kidney disease, peripheral vascular disease, and depressive episodes. Review of Resident #100's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], Section C - Cognitive Patterns revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 00 out of 15 showing Resident #100 was cognitively impaired. Functional Abilities and Goals, Section GG revealed Resident #100 required Partial/moderate assistance for Toileting hygiene, and Shower/bathe care, personal hygiene, upper body dressing, lower body dressing, and putting on/taking off footwear. According to the Self-Care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-09-01 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolatedHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of the Food Committee meeting minutes and the facility policy on Grievances/Complaints, Filing; interview with the Dietary Manager, and interview and observation of eight residents (#157, #160, #159, #158, #38, #15, #30, #72) at meals, the facility failed to resolve a concern related to receiving condiments at meals voiced at the Food Committee meeting. Findings included: An interview was conducted with Resident #157 on 08/29/2022 beginning at 10:30 a.m. He reported that the breakfast meal was always great with the lunch and dinner meal so-so. He said he was never given salt and pepper and was told he had to ask the aides for it when they brought his tray. He said he sometimes would remember to ask before they brought the tray, but if he forgot they often forgot also. He said he liked sandwiches at lunch, not the hot meal, but usually it didn't come with mayonnaise or mustard. He said sometimes he waited for someone to being him the condiment and sometimes he went without. A second visit with Resident #157 on 08/30/2022 at 12:30 p.m., during lunch, confirmed that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to implement their Weight Assessment and Intervention Policy by developing a care plan relevant to weight loss and failed to implement the care plan that had been developed on 02/19/2021 and revised on 04/09/2021 and 03/14/2022, for one (Resident #20 ) of 48 sampled residents related to weight loss. Findings included: Resident #20 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included Multiple Sclerosis, heart disease, and depression. A review of the resident's monthly weights revealed weight loss from 179 lbs (pounds) on 01/06/2022 to 159 lbs on 08/03/2022. In six months, from 02/02/2022 when the resident was weighed at 175.5 lbs, until 08/03/2022, the resident sustained a weight loss of 16.5 lbs or 9%. Resident #20 weighed 173 lbs on 06/07/2022, 168 lbs on 07/04/2022, and 159 lbs on 08/03/2022. Weight loss for this resident was continuing without changes to the care plan or to the resident's diet order. The change…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide activities of daily living (ADL) tasks for residents who required assistance to address soiled fingernails for one (Resident #207) of three residents sampled for ADL care. Findings included: Review of Resident #207's record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 06 which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Review of the admission readmission Nursing Packet dated 08/12/2022, revealed under the ADL Evaluation section the resident was coded as X 1 Staff Total Dependence (Resident Does Not Participate In Activity At All) regarding how much assistance the resident required with personal hygiene. Review of the resident's care plan dated 8/12/22 with a revision on 8/29/22 related to OT (Occupational Therapy) evaluation complete. Resident requires assistance with ADL functions. Review of the Certified Nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interview, the facility failed to assess scratches on a resident's shins for one (Resident #9) of two residents sampled for skin conditions. Findings included: Review of Resident #9's record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 which indicated intact cognition. An observation of Resident #9 on 08/29/22 at 9:54 a.m., revealed the resident's bilateral shins were noted with scratches that were dry and red in color. An observation on 08/31/22 at 3:36 p.m., revealed Resident #9 sitting in her wheelchair in her room. The resident was noted to have scratches that were red in color on her bilateral shins. An interview with the resident at that time revealed she did not know how she got the scratches and thought she scratched herself. In an interview on 09/01/22 at 11:01 a.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) said she was not aware the resident had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-09-01 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility did not identify the specific behaviors to monitor related to the administration of psychotropic medications for two (Residents #1 and #9) of six residents sampled for unnecessary medications. Findings included: 1. A review of Resident #9's record revealed that she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 which indicated intact cognition. Resident #9 had diagnoses that included Major Depressive Disorder, Mood Disorder, and Anxiety Disorder, according to her face sheet. A review of the resident's physician orders revealed current orders for the use of Depakote Tablet Delayed Release 125 MG give 125 mg by mouth in the evening related to UNSPECIFIED MOOD (AFFECTIVE) DISORDER; Escitalopram Oxalate Tablet Give 10 mg by mouth at bedtime related to MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER, RECURRENT, UNSPECIFIED; Lorazepam Tablet 0.5 MG Give 0.5 mg by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-01 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure the medication error rate was below 5 % for three (Residents #35, #257, and #96) of four sampled residents who were observed during medication administration. This resulted in 8 errors from 31 medication administration opportunities for a medication error rate of 25.81%. Findings Included: 1. On 08/31/2022 at 8:47 a.m., an observation of medication administration with Staff D, Registered Nurse (RN), was conducted with Resident #35. Staff D prepared and administered the following medications: Brimonidine Tartrate 0.2% solution one drop in both eyes, multivitamin with mineral one tablet, Plavix 75 mg one tablet, Lisinopril 40 mg tablet, Duloxetine HCL capsule delayed release 60 mg, Spironolactone 25 mg one tablet, Timolol maleate solution 0.5% one drop into each eye, and Lasix 40 mg tablet one tablet. Staff D stated the resident had an ordered dose of Amitiza capsule 8 mcg give 1 capsule by mouth every 12 hours for constipation dated 07/01/2022, but it was not in the medication cart. The nurse further…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-09-01 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide dental services to one (Resident #35) of three residents sampled for dentures. Findings Included: On 08/29/22 at 11:09 a.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #35 as she was observed edentulous when she opened her mouth. She stated, I had dentures, but it was years ago. She said when she was hospitalized about 4 or 5 years ago, I had to call an ambulance to pick me up. I wish I had taken my dentures with me. Resident #35 stated When I was in the hospital, they threw out everything in my apartment. My dentures and everything I owned. She denied having issues with chewing but if the meat, especially the pork chops, were dry it took a while to chew them. When asked, Resident #34 smiled broadly and stated, I would love dentures. She confirmed she would wear them if she had them. Resident #35 denied the facility had ever asked about obtaining dentures. She said she could not recall the last time a Dentist had performed an oral examination. Medical record review of the admission Record Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-04-15 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that one (Resident #21) of 40 residents sampled for PASRR (Pre-admission Screen and Resident Review) compliance was accurately completed and referred to the appropriate authority for PASRR Level II evaluation and determination. Findings included: Resident record review for Resident # 21 revealed that she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Dementia and Psychosis. The record review revealed that the Level I PASRR was completed on 7/3/19, prior to admission. Further review revealed that the PASRR was inaccurate indicating that Resident #20 did not have a diagnosis of Dementia. The record review of the medical record for Resident #21 revealed that there was no written proof that a completed Level II PASRR had been completed. An interview was conducted with the Social Services Director on 4/14/21 at 1:58 p.m. who confirmed that the PASRR paperwork was not accurate in the chart for Resident #21 and should have been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-04-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to ensure two (Residents #6 and #28) of forty sampled residents received the necessary services to provide grooming and personal hygiene related to showers, nail care, and shaves. Findings included: 1. An observation and interview was conducted on Monday, 4/12/21 at 11:53 a.m., with Resident #6. The resident appeared to have a scruffy appearance and was unshaven. When asked if he choose to be unshaven, he stated he needed to be shaved. The resident stated he would allow staff to shave him if they asked. On Tuesday, 4/13/21 at 8:50 a.m., Resident #6 was observed lying in bed, his facial hair appeared to be unshaven and unclean. On 4/14/21 at 8:47 a.m., Resident #6 was asked if he had the amount of showers he wanted, he stated, I need to have more. Resident #6 stated staff help when they were able and when asked if he wanted to be shaved, the resident nodded head and chuckled. The admission Record for Resident #6 indicated that the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-04-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure an accident free environment for one (Resident #56) of three residents sampled for accidents. Findings included: On 4/12/21 at 12:16 p.m., Resident #56's oxygen tubing was observed on the floor and under the resident's bed. A review of the Resident #56's face sheet revealed that the resident was admitted on [DATE], readmitted on [DATE], and was his own responsible party. A review of Section E (Mood and Behaviors) of Resident #56's Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed on 3/10/21 revealed that the resident had no identified areas of concern for behaviors. Section O (Special Treatments) revealed that the resident received oxygen therapy. A review of Resident #56's event history for the last 120 days revealed an event on 2/8/21 at 3:30 p.m. that stated, [Resident #56] observed lying on the floor in his room [Resident #56] stated 'I trip [sic] on the oxygen cord and fell, I'm ok just get me up.' A review of Resident #56's care plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-04-15 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, interviews, and observations the facility failed to assess eight (#6, #10, #11, #14, #18, #30, #45, and #73) out of forty sampled residents for the use of bed/side rails prior to their use, to obtain consent for their use from the resident or/and representative prior to their use, failed to obtain a physician order for their use, and to include the use of side rails in the resident's care plan. Findings included: The policy number ROP-44 was obtained from the Director of Nursing (DON), titled: Proper Use of Side Rails, and created 11/17, indicated the facility prohibits the use of side rails as a restraint. The Explanation and Compliance Guidelines of the policy included the following: - 2. An assessment of the resident's symptoms and the reason for using side rails will be conducted prior to use, including their mental status and reason for use of the side rail, and will be documented in the residents record. - 3. The physician will also review and order side rails usage as he deems…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-04-15 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to implement an effective Antibiotic Stewardship program related to the monitoring of antibiotic use of one (Resident #27) of one resident sampled for Transmission-based precautions. Findings included: The Facility Matrix indicated that Resident #27 was on Transmission-based precautions. An observation on 4/13/21 at 4:03 p.m. of the area outside of Resident #27's room, did not indicate that any Personal Protective Equipment was available for staff or any signs were posted with the type of precautions to be observed while caring for the resident. On 4/13/21 at 4:04 p.m., Staff J, Registered Nurse Supervisor, stated there was not anyone on Transmission-based Precautions. When asked about Resident #27, she stated she had spoken to the physician and that the precautions were discontinued as the resident had been on an antibiotic for eight days. A review of the April Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident #27 indicated the resident received Linezolid 600 milligrams (mg) by mouth every 12 hours for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to ASTON HEALTH — 38 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 4.1 | -2.1 vs chain |
The other 37 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.7★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| FAIRWAY OAKS HOLDCO LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 12/15/2023 |
| LCE PARTNERS LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 01/01/2021 |
| FRIEDMAN, LEOPOLD | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 12/15/2023 |
| GUTMAN, SAMUEL | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 01/01/2021 |
| AGBANEJE STERLIN, EMMANUEL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 03/05/2025 |
| HARRIS, TOMIKA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 02/18/2025 |
| LEGENDARY, ZECHARIAH | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/16/2025 |
| THACKER, TRICIA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 04/04/2022 |
| ASTON HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/16/2025 |
| GUERRERO CUETO, RAMON | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/16/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $2.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 23% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in FL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 105305. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-09-11, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.