Cedarbrook Health And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 122 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 40.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 66 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 63% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 45% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 115.2 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.41 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.70 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.09 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.14 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.52 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.75 to 0.58 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 70% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-11-15 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to obtain physician ordered medication and ensure timely administration of pain medications for 1 (Resident #318) of 5 residents sampled for medication regimen review, causing ongoing severe pain to the resident. The findings included: Review of the clinical record for Resident #318 revealed a date of admission of 11/11/24. Diagnoses included chronic back pain due to spinal stenosis. On 11/13/24 at 10:47 a.m., in an interview Resident #318 said, I waited 20 hours to get a pain pill when I was admitted to the facility. I was miserable, in pain, and crying. The resident said she kept telling the nurse on duty to call the physician. Resident #318 said the nursing staff kept telling her the delivery would be here shortly. The resident said, I waited until 2:00 a.m. and the medication didn't come. Then I waited till 5:00 a.m. and the medication didn't come. Resident #318 said her roommate witnessed her crying at breakfast time. She said at 9:00 a.m. that morning she called her daughter and told her she was going to call 911 if…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, review of facility policy and procedure, residents, residents' family and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to maintain personal hygiene for 5 (Residents #8, #51, #89, #95 and #317) of 10 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL's). The findings included: The facility policy ADL Care and Services revised 01/2024 documented, Residents will be provided with care, treatment and services as appropriate to maintain or improve their ability to carry out ADL's . Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADL's independently, with the consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care, including appropriate support and assistance with: Hygiene (bathing, dressing, grooming, nail and oral care.) 1. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #8 had an admission date of 4/7/24 with diagnoses including dementia with mood disturbance, muscle weakness…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-11-15 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, Interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to provide sufficient staff to ensure call lights were answered in a timely manner for nine of nine residents surveyed (Resident #89, #213, #23, #13, #95, #8, #51, #317, and #18) and failed to provide showers, activities of daily living care, oral and nail care in a timely manner. Findings included: 1. On 11/12/24 at 10:03 a.m. Resident #89 was observed in the bed, he was unshaven, and his fingernails were approximately 1/2 inch in length. His feet were uncovered, and he had a thick peeling crust that was visible on the soiled sheets. His urinal was on the bedside table. He said he does not receive the help he needs and if he puts the call light on, he waits a long time over 30 minutes. There was a strong odor of urine in the room. On 11/14/24 at 12:48 p.m., and 11/14/25 at 12:35 p.m., Resident #89 was observed in his room in bed remaining unshaven. He said no one had offered to shave him or cut his nails. He said he has not refused to be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-15 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interview the facility failed to notify the resident's representative of a dose reduction and discontinuation of antipsychotic medication for 1 (Resident #95) of 5 residents sampled for medication regimen review. The findings included: Record review revealed Resident #95 was an [AGE] year-old male admitted from an acute care hospital on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, Dementia, and Depression. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with a target date of 10/15/24 showed the resident's cognition was severely impaired with a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 03. The admission record noted Resident #95's significant other was responsible for making his healthcare decisions. The discharging hospital medication history documented Resident #95 a physician's order for Seroquel (antipsychotic) 50 milligrams (mg) one tablet by mouth two times a day. Review of the physician's orders revealed an order dated 10/13/24 for Seroquel 50 mg one tablet by mouth two…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-15 · tag F0636 — isolated
  Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive assessment was accurate and reflected residents' activity preference for 2 (Residents #83 and #95) of 4 residents surveyed for activities. The findings included: 1. Review of the clinical record for Resident #83 revealed an admission date to the facility of 8/24/24. Diagnoses included Cerebral Vascular Accident (CVA), Dementia, and Parkinson's Disease. The clinical record noted the resident's spouse was the Health Care Surrogate. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment with a target date of 8/27/24 showed the resident's cognition was severely impaired with a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 00 (lack of ability to answer basic orientation and memory questions correctly). The MDS noted Resident #83 was interviewed for preferences for Customary Routine and Activities. The assessment showed 1 (very important) was entered for all eight questions for interview for daily preferences, and for all eight questions related to activity preferences. 2. Review of the clinical record for Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, clinical record review, resident representative and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide an ongoing, meaningful, resident centered activity program to support the interest and meet the physical, mental, and psychological well-being of 2 (Residents #95 and #8) of 7 residents reviewed for involvement in activities. The findings included: 1. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #8 had an admission date of 4/7/24 with diagnoses including dementia with mood disturbance and anxiety. The 5-day scheduled Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with a target date of 10/31/24 noted the resident's cognition was moderately impaired with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 09. Review of the Lifestyle and Activity Preferences Evaluation dated 10/29/24 documented activities were very important to the Resident. Questions #2 to 13 were not completed for background information. Functional status questions #1 to 11 were not completed. Leisure Preferences, questions #1 to 12 were not completed. Review of the Care Plan initiated 4/5/24 (Revised…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of facility policy and procedures, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain urinary catheters in a safe and sanitary manner for 1(Resident #25) of 1 resident reviewed with an indwelling urinary catheter. The findings included: The facility policy Catheter Care issued 10/20 (revised 1/24) documented The facility will maintain infection control guidelines related to catheter use and catheter care to minimize catheter associated infections. Ensure the drainage spigot is not touching the floor, the tubing is free of kinks, the catheter is kept at an appropriate level to promote urine flow, and dignity is maintained. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #25 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including benign prostatic hypertrophy (enlarged prostate), Parkinson's disease, and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder requiring an indwelling urinary catheter. The record showed Resident #25 had a hospital admission on [DATE] with diagnosis of a urinary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-15 · tag F0694 — isolated
  Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of facility policy and procedures, review of the clinical record and resident and staff interview the facility failed to ensure 2 (Residents #67 and #89) of 2 residents receiving intravenous solution received appropriate care of the intravenous insertion site, including dressing changes and flushing the line. The findings included: The facility policy Central Lines documented, Flush catheters at regular intervals to maintain patency and before and after the following: a. administration of intermittent solutions. b.administration of medication. c. obtaining blood samples d. converting from continuous to intermittent therapies. In addition to adhering to professional standards of practice, facilities are responsible for administering IV therapy according to the physician's orders, the residents goals, preferences and advanced directives as applicable and according to State law. 1. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #67 had an admission date of 2/2/23 with diagnoses…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, review of facility policy and procedure, and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain resident nebulizer machines (turns liquid medication into a mist that can be inhaled) in a sanitary manner for 2 (Resident #6 and #18) of 2 residents reviewed with a nebulizer. The findings included: The facility policy Nebulizer (revised 12/2023) documented General Guidelines #4, Store nebulizer and tubing in a hygienic manner when not in use (ie., labeling bag with a date tubing was changed. On 11/12/24 at 10:20 a.m., in during an observation in Resident #6's room there was a nebulizer and the mask was on top of the night stand uncovered, and undated. Photographic evidence obtained. On 11/12/24 at 10:44 a.m., Resident #18 was observed in her room. There was a nebulizer in on the nightstand with the mask hanging down the side of the nightstand. On 11/15/24 at 9:52 a.m., in an interview Unit Manager Registered Nurse Staff D said nebulizer masks were to be covered in a plastic bag when not in use and dated. She said the residents will take them out of the bags and just…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-15 · tag F0800 — isolated
  Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide a diet to accommodate the documented gluten and lactose dietary restriction for 1 (Resident #13) of 2 residents reviewed for nutrition. The findings Included: Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Type II Diabetes, Celiac Disease (immune reaction to eating gluten), and malnutrition. On 11/13/24 at 10:35 a.m., in an interview Resident #13 said she had Celiac Disease, and she is always being served oatmeal and grits. Resident #13 said she has told dietary staff she cannot eat oatmeal and grits. On 11/15/24 at 8:20 a.m., Resident #13's breakfast was observed. The resident's meal ticket said she was allergic to Gluten and Lactose. The meal ticket listed her dislikes as bread and Fish/Seafood. The resident was observed to have a carton of 2% milk, a container of cereal and scrambled eggs. On 11/15/24 at 12:35 p.m., Resident #13 was observed eating lunch in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a safe, clean, comfortable and sanitary environment for residents and failed to provide the necessary linens required for resident care. The findings included: 1. On 11/12/24 at 9:09 a.m., upon entrance to the facility a strong odor of urine was noted. A large brown crawling insect was observed on its back in the small dining room. On 11/12/24 at 11:41 a.m., Maintenance Assistant Staff C verified the observation of the brown crawling insect in the small dining room. Staff C picked up the insect from the floor. The insect was alive and crawled up the staff's arm. 2. On 11/12/24 at 9:30 a.m., the following observations were made during an initial tour of the 400 unit: Resident #25's indwelling catheter drainage bag was on the floor. Registered Nurse Staff A was present during the observation and verified the resident's indwelling catheter drainage bag was on the floor. Photographic evidence obtained. 2. room [ROOM NUMBER]: The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$16,801 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $16,801 — penalty dated 2024-11-15

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ASTON HEALTH — 38 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $394K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL