Meadowpark Health And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 185 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 48.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 85 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 45% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 105.0 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.51 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.83 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.13 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.28 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.61 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.93 to 0.59 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 57% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure grievances regarding a room change were addressed in a timely manner for two residents (#14 and #34) of 20 sampled residents. Findings Included: During a tour on 05/11/2026 at 09:02 AM, Resident #14 and Resident #34 reported verbally cursing each other and not wanting to be roommates. Resident #14 explained not being able to get along with the roommate. Resident #34 stated the situation had been reported to the staff and both stated being agreeable to a room change at the time.During an interview on 05/13/2026 9:09 AM, Staff E, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)/ Unit Manger (UM), explained being notified by Resident #34's family member, of Resident #14 cursing at Resident #34. Staff E stated having spoken to the Social Services Director (SSD) and stated a grievance had been opened for the situation. During an interview on 05/13/2026 at 09:22 AM, the SSD stated the facility had a care plan meeting with Resident #34 a few weeks prior. The SSD stated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plans were revised to reflect personal care preferences related to contracture management and use of orthotics/splints for one resident (#2) out of 20 sampled residents.Findings included: During room visits on 5/11/2026 at 11:40 a.m., 5/12/2026 at 8:50 a.m., 1:50 p.m., 5/13/2026 at 8:30 a.m., and on 5/14/2026 at 8:25 a.m. and 10:00 a.m., Resident #2 was observed lying flat in bed. Resident #2 was not able to answer any questions related to his care needs. Resident #2's upper extremities to include hands and fingers were severely contracted. Resident #2 was not wearing any type of hand orthotics/splints/braces during these observations. The room was observed without any orthotics/splints/braces.On 5/13/2026 at 10:00 a.m. Resident #2's assigned Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) for the 7-3 shift, Staff D, revealed he was not aware of Resident #2 utilizing or having the need to use hand orthotics/splints/braces. Staff D…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure nail care was offered/provided for one resident (#2) of 20 sampled residents.Findings included: During room visits on 5/11/2026 at 11:40 a.m., 5/12/2026 at 8:50 a.m., 1:50 p.m., 5/13/2026 at 8:30 a.m., and on 5/14/2026 at 8:25 a.m. and 10:00 a.m., Resident #2 was observed lying flat in bed. Resident #2 was not able to answer any questions related to his care needs. Further observations revealed both of Resident #2's hands had finger nails that were elongated, and with dark brown debris under the fingernail bed. Most of the finger nails were observed at least a quarter inch to over a half inch in length from the tips of the finger.On 5/13/2026 at 10:00 a.m. an interview was conducted with Staff D, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) who stated he normally cared for Resident #2 and knew he is totally dependent on staff for all ADL (activities of daily living) Staff D observed Resident #2's fingernails on both hands and confirmed they…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
  Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure call light buttons/call light cords were placed within reach for three residents (#2, #59 and #97) out of forty-three sampled residents.Findings included: During a room visit on 5/11/2026 at 11:40 a.m., and on 5/13/2026 at 8:30 a.m. Resident #2 was observed lying flat in bed and the resident's call light button was not anywhere on the bed, or near Resident #2. It was noted a push pad call light button was on the floor and slightly under the bed frame foot stand. Resident #2 would not be able to use the call light, as it was out from his reach. On 5/13/2026 at 8:33 a.m. an interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), Staff C confirmed the call light pad, and cord was lying on the floor back behind Resident #2 and under the bed frame foot stand. Staff C stated that all residents should always have the call light placed within their reach when they are in bed. On 5/14/2026 at 10:00 a.m. an interview with Staff B, Licensed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-21 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the grievance process was conducted to resolve grievances in a timely manner for five residents (#3, #5, #6, #7, and #8) of eight sampled residents. Findings included: On 11/20/2024 at approximately 11:50 a.m., the NHA (Nursing Home Administrator) presented the facility grievance logs for 01/01/2024 through the date of survey, 11/20/2024. A review of the log revealed no information to identify the type of concern the grievance was about. The NHA was interviewed at 11:57 a.m. The NHA said she could not identify what kind of grievance was filed and she did not see a column to identify the type of grievance filed by the submitter. She stated, For March and April, there is a category column on the form and then, they switched back to the incorrect form. She stated there should be an identifier as to the type of grievance. She stated it was important to identify the type of the grievance for tracks and trends, to identify if there are…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure resident rights were honored for two residents (#3 and #4) out of 3 residents sampled related to removing residents from isolation precautions according to the standards of practice. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #3's admission Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses of enterocolitis due to clostridium difficile (C-Diff) and major depressive disorder. An observation was made on 11/20/2024 at 10:25 a.m., Resident #3's room was observed to have a contact precaution sign on the door. Staff D, Occupational Therapist Assistant (OTA), was observed in the resident's room. She stated Resident #3 was getting dressed, she would be out soon, she would be going down to therapy. Staff D, OTA was observed to have gloves on, no gown, and no mask. Resident #3 was observed sitting on her bedside, with the top half of her body dressed. An observation and interview was conducted on 11/20/2024 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the development of a person-centered care plan related to shoulder replacement and pain during care for one resident (#2) of eight sampled residents. Findings included: A review of Resident #2's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/23/2024, with readmission on [DATE]. The medical diagnosis list included, Parkinson's disease without dyskinesia without mention of fluctuations; moderate protein calorie malnutrition; altered mental status; cellulitis of right toe; dementia in other diseases .metabolic syndrome; other iron deficiencies anemia; generalized anxiety disorder . presence of left artificial shoulder joint. A review of Resident #2's MDS (Minimum Data Set) Quarterly Assessment, dated 10/22/2024, Section C, documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8, which meant Resident #2 was moderately impaired. On 11/20/2024 at 11:05 a.m., an observation was conducted of Resident #2 in his room. Lights were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to honor the right of the resident's representative to participate in the development of the resident's care plan for one resident (#5) out of eight sampled residents. Findings included: A review of Resident #5's admission Record, documented an admission of 07/03/2024. The Medical diagnosis included but not limited to: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary disease, Dementia without behavioral disturbance, and generalized anxiety disorder. A review of Resident #5's MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessments reflected a quarterly assessment had been completed on 10/08/2024. The assessment documented a BIMS score of 3, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. On 11/20/2024 at 4:44 p.m., an observation was conducted of Resident #5 sitting in a wheelchair close to the nurses' station, she was dressed, groomed, clean in appearance talking to other residents next to her. A phone interview was conducted on 11/20/2024 at 4:03 p.m. with Resident #5's family member. During the interview, she stated, I have asked for a care plan…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide Activities of Daily Living (ADL) services related to toileting for two residents (#2 and #5) out of eight sampled residents. Findings include: Resident #2: A review of Resident #2's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/23/2024, and readmission on [DATE]. Resident #2's medical diagnosis list included: Parkinson's disease without dyskinesia without mention of fluctuations; moderate protein calorie malnutrition; altered mental status; cellulitis of right toe; dementia in other diseases .metabolic syndrome; other iron deficiencies anemia; generalized anxiety disorder . presence of left artificial shoulder joint. A review of Resident #2's MDS (Minimum Data Set) Quarterly Assessment, dated 10/22/2024, Section C, documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8, indicating Resident #2 was moderately cognitively impaired. On 11/20/2024 at approximately 3:00 p.m., an interview was conducted with the Assistant…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-12-07 · tag F0644 — pattern
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level I for eight (Residents #50, #2, #69, #3, #22, #54, #65, and #56) of eight residents admitted with mental health and/or cognitive diagnoses sampled for PASRR. Findings include: 1. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a primary diagnosis of multiple fractures according to the admission face sheet. Further review of the admission face sheet revealed subsequent diagnoses that included unspecified dementia and generalized anxiety disorder. Review of a PASRR Level I form dated 10/13/2023 revealed Section 1A marked 'anxiety disorder' and Section II checked 'no.' Continued review revealed Section 5. (primary diagnosis of dementia or neurocognitive disorder) checked 'no', and Section 6. (secondary diagnosis of dementia or neurocognitive disorder) checked 'yes.' Section IV, (no diagnoses…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ASTON HEALTH — 38 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $417K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL