Kensington Gardens Rehab And Nursing Center
2055 Palmetto St, Clearwater, FL 33758 · For profit - Individual · 150 certified beds · (727) 461-6613 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0568, F0569)
- a high number of inspection citations overall (41) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $18,070 in federal fines (most recent 2025-05-13)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- about 18% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
- its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 9.7% | 8.7% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.7% | 5.5% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.7% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 4.6% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.7% | 2.5% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 6.2% | 9.5% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 27.7% | 14.4% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 99.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 8.2% | 4.5% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 18.2% | 10.5% | 21.2% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 20.6% | 8.6% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.6% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 87.3% | 94.7% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 28.7% | 26.1% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 6.1% | 9.1% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.09 | 2.13 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.82 | 1.15 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
34.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 54 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 38.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 55 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 64% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 29% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 34.4%CMS range 24.1–45.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.7%CMS range 8.4–16.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 38.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 36.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 32.7% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 97.8% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 97.1% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.3%CMS range 4.6–12.7 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.09 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 150 beds and averages 128.5 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.57 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.56 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.14 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.28 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.68 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.62 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
41 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 31 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-18 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to implement an effective Antibiotic Stewardship program as evidence by the lack of tracking of infections and not ensuring antibiotic use met infection criteria. Findings included: Review of the facility December 2025 Infection and Antibiotic Tracking Tool showed symptoms related to antibiotic use as urinary tract symptoms. The tool revealed Resident #42 was diagnosed with an urinary tract infection (UTI) with symptoms of urinary tract symptoms and leukocytosis, an urine test was obtained with no documentation of white blood cell count (WBC), colony count, or culture results. The documentation showed the resident was treated with Ceftriaxone for 7 days (12/20-12/27/25) and the urinalysis (UA) was negative (neg). Review of the facility January 2026 Infection and Antibiotic Tracking Tool revealed the tool was incomplete, symptoms were not listed and did not show if a culture or test had been obtained for five of nineteen facility acquired conditions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to implement an effective infection control program related to staff performing hand hygiene between providing care for two (#27 and #28) resident's and failed to ensure an enhanced barrier precaution sign was posted for one (#29) of thirteen residents diagnosed with a infectious disease.Findings included: On 2/17/26 at 9:40 a.m. Staff J, Restorative Aide (RA) was observed standing next to Resident #27s bed. The staff member was observed removing a pair of gloves, leaving the room, crossing the hallway, and entering Resident #28s room. The staff member came out of room holding a pair of disposable gloves going to the laundry cart parked further down the hallway. Staff J returned to Resident #28s room and was heard informing the resident that a splint would be put on Resident #28. The staff member exited the room and stated hand hygiene should have been performed after removing gloves and had not completed the task in between the two…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-16 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive grievance policy and procedure, failed to implement the grievance procedure to investigate customer care concerns for two residents (#8 and #2), and failed to have evidence of informing the results of grievance investigation for four residents (#9, #8, #10, and #2) of four residents sampled for grievances.Findings included: A review of the facility's Grievances - Resident Rights policy and procedure, last revised 07/2024, documented the guideline: The Administrator and staff will make prompt efforts to resolve grievance so the satisfaction of the resident and / or representative.The Procedure:Any resident, family member, or appointed resident representative may file a grievance or complaint concerning the care, treatment, behavior of other residents, staff members, theft of property, or any other concerns regarding his or her stay at the facility. Grievances also may be voiced or filed regarding care that has not been furnished. All grievances, complaints or recommendations stemming…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide quality of care related to resident assessments for a change in condition of vascular wounds for two residents (#4 and #11) of six sampled residents. Findings included: 1. Resident #4 was admitted on [DATE], readmitted on [DATE] and discharged on [DATE]. Review of the admissions record showed diagnoses included but not limited to diabetes, acquired below knee amputation, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Peripheral vascular disease, muscle weakness, permanent atrial fibrillation, Chronic systolic congestive heart failure, and pulmonary hypertension. Review of the Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 or cognitively intact. Section GG showed he required maximum assistance for toileting and bathing. Section O, showed he was on oxygen. Review of the physician orders showedResident was a full codeContinuous oxygen at 2 liters per minute via nasal cannula for shortness of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide assessments post falls including vital signs and neurological checks for one resident (#3) of three sampled residents.Findings included: Resident #3 was admitted on [DATE], readmitted on [DATE] and discharged on 01/03/2026 to the hospital. Review of the admission record showed diagnoses included but not limited to diabetes, anemia, dementia, pancreatic cancer, depression, protein-calorie malnutrition, myocardial infarction, atrioventricular block first degree, nonrheumatic aortic valve stenosis, dysphagia, colostomy, history of breast cancer, arial fibrillation, anxiety, history of falls, and hypotension.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, meaning cognitively intact. Section GG showed the resident required supervision or touching assistance for toileting and bathing. Review of progress notes and SBARs (Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-16 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide an Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) practice that demonstrated identification, monitoring, and implementation of an effective action plan to correct previously cited deficient practice at F689 in regards to: 1) preventing a vulnerable resident with severe cognitive impairment from exiting the facility for one resident (#26) out of two residents reviewed for elopement risk; and 2) ensuring elopement risk binders were updated/accurate to ensure staff knew who was at risk for four out of four binders reviewed. Findings included: On 2/17/26 at 9:52 a.m., Staff A, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was observed sitting outside Resident #26's room. An interview with Staff A, CNA revealed Resident #26, Left through the front door last week or over the weekend. She said during this shift she was on one-to-one (1:1) supervision with the resident because Resident #26 exited the facility. A review of Resident #26's admission record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-16 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide notice of change in condition related to informing the resident's family regarding a fall and failed to follow-up with the Primary Provider after a fall for one resident (#3) of five sampled residents.Findings included: Resident #3 was admitted on [DATE], readmitted on [DATE] and discharged on 01/03/2026 to the hospital. Review of the admission record showed diagnoses included but not limited to diabetes, anemia, dementia, pancreatic cancer, depression, protein-calorie malnutrition, myocardial infarction, atrioventricular block first degree, nonrheumatic aortic valve stenosis, dysphagia, colostomy, history of breast cancer, atrial fibrillation, anxiety, history of falls, and hypotension.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 meaning cognitively intact. Section GG showed the resident required supervision or touching assistance for toileting and bathing.Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to ensure a safe and clean environment related to soiled/stained privacy curtains in two resident rooms (#206 and #325) out of three rooms observed. Findings included: On 1/15/26 at 9:16a.m., an observation of room [ROOM NUMBER]'s privacy curtain revealed multiple brown stains smeared along the length of the curtain.On 1/15/26 at 12:33p.m., an observation of room [ROOM NUMBER]'s privacy curtain revealed a large brown stain smeared on the curtain.On 1/15/26 at 11:45a.m., an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) revealed it is the responsibility of housekeeping to put in orders for new privacy curtains.On 1/15/26 at 11:51a.m., an interview with the Housekeeping Manager (HM) revealed if a privacy curtain has any stains, it is addressed and swapped out right away. The HM stated the Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) or housekeeping staff will advise the HM of any stained or dirty privacy curtains, but the HM will try to check all curtains once a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-16 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to effectively implement the Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, Misappropriation, Mistreatment, and Injury of Unknown Origin (ANEMMI) policy and procedure for 2 (#2 and #8) of fifteen sampled residents. Resident #8 complained on 12/11/25 about customer service which was not investigated or reported; subsequently Resident #2 reported an allegation of mental / verbal abuse on 12/27/2025 which was verified.Findings included: A review of Resident #8's clinical chart, the admission record, documented an admission of 12/05/2025. The diagnosis information included but not limited to Necrotizing Fasciitis, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus without complications; chronic combined systolic (congestive) and diastolic (congestive) heart failure; difficulty in walking; muscle weakness; and colostomy status. A review of a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), dated 12/08/2025, and 01/15/2026, documented a score of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact.A review of Resident #8's care plan included the following:Focus:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of neglect regarding untimely care and services was investigated and reported within 24 hours to the State Survey Agency and adult protective services for one resident (#8) of fifteen sampled residents. Findings included: A review of Resident #8's clinical chart, the admission record, documented an admission of 12/05/2025. The diagnosis information included but not limited to Necrotizing Fasciitis, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus without complications; chronic combined systolic (congestive) and diastolic (congestive) heart failure; difficulty in walking; muscle weakness; and colostomy status. A review of a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), dated 12/08/2025, and 01/15/2026, documented a score of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. A review of Resident #8's care plan included the following:Focus: Resident has colostomy, r/t (due to) large buttock wound, divergent colostomy, initiated 12/07/2025. Interventions included: Apply skin barrier around stoma to protect from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 31 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure updates of care plans for two out of four residents reviewed (Resident #1 and #231B). Findings included: A review of the facility policy titled Comprehensive MDS Assessment and Care Plan, Revised 2/2024, revealed - It will be standard of this facility to make a comprehensive assessment of a resident's needs, strengths, goals, life history and preferences, using the resident assessment instrument (RAI) specified by CMS . The plan of care will be reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment, including both the comprehensive and quarterly review assessments. The plan of care will be reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment, including both the comprehensive and quarterly review assessments. The services provided or arranged by the facility, as outlined by the comprehensive care plan, will be provided by qualified persons in accordance with each resident's written plan of care and will also be culturally competent and trauma informed.On 1/15/26…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure ADLs (activities of daily living) related to nail care was provided for two residents (#1, #13) out of four residents sampled.Findings included: On 1/15/26 at 9:17 a.m., an observation of Resident #1 revealed orange and brown build up underneath the resident's nails.A review of Resident #1's admissions record revealed an admission date of 11/18/22 with diagnoses to include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Parkinson's disease, ataxia and tremors.A review of Resident #1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/10/25, in section C - cognitive patterns revealed a Brief Interview Mental Score (BIMS) of 07, severe impairment. A review of Section E- Behavior for Resident #1's Rejection of Care- Presence and Frequency scored a 0-behavior not exhibited.A review of Resident #1's original Care Plan dated 12/25/25 revealed Resident #1 has a ADL, self-care deficit related to their Parkinson's diagnosis, and the resident should be encouraged and assisted with all ADL tasks including but not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility did not ensure equipment was safe, sanitary and operational, and failed provide a safe, functioning, sanitary and comfortable environment in resident's rooms for six residents (#5, #6, #7, #11, #12 and #13) out of 15 residents sampled, and in common areas to include food storage areas. Findings included: On 6/11/2025 at 10:45 a.m., an observation and interview were conducted with Resident #5 in his room. Resident #5 stated his overhead light does not work very well, and stated, it flickers on and off, and stated his roommate's [Resident #6] light, does not work at all. Staff P, Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA), entered the room and agreed the lights were not working properly. Staff P, CNA stated this was not her assignment. She stated she will notify their nurse. On 6/11/2025 at 10:52 a.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #7. Resident #7 stated she received a new bed this morning because the other bed was not working but stated, this bed's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement policies and procedures for ensuring the reporting of a reasonable suspicion of a crime in accordance with section 1150B of the Act for one resident (#3) out of four residents sampled. Findings included: Review of Resident #3's admission Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses of displaced fracture of upper end of right humerus, with routine healing, asthma, dysphagia, unsteadiness on feet, lack of coordination, abnormalities of gait and mobility, muscle weakness, major depressive disorder, post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and generalized anxiety disorder. An interview was conducted on 6/11/25 at 11:03AM with Resident #3. She said it was a Saturday around the last week of May 2025; she came out of the bathroom and was in a towel. She said Staff C, Occupational Therapist Assistant (OTA) knocked, came into her room, and she realized it was a male, so she said, I'm not dressed get out!…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate a resident-to-resident allegation of abuse involving two residents (#14 and #15) out of four reportable events sampled. Findings included: Review of the facility's state agency reportable log revealed on 5/22/25 a resident to resident report was made involving Resident #14 and Resident #15. An interview was conducted on 6/11/25 at 1:21 PM with the Director of Nursing (DON) and the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) on 6/11/25 at 1:21PM. The DON said she was the one who reported and investigated the event and the NHA said she was not working at the facility at the time the event occurred. The DON said the event occurred on 5/22/25 around 6:00 PM and she reported the event the state agencies on 5/22/25 at 6:00 PM. The DON said staff reported to Staff D, Eat Wing Unit Manager (UM) that Resident #14 made contact with Resident #15 to the back of his head. Staff were noted to be within close immediate proximity with both residents and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolatedMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility did maintain an effective pest control program related to roaches for their residents. Findings include: On [DATE] at 10:11 a.m., an observation was made in front of Resident #4's room of a large moving roach on its back swept up in a pile of debris from Staff A, housekeeping. An interview was conducted with Resident #4 in his room. Resident #4 stated roaches are a problem and he sees them all the time in his room. Upon observation, live roaches were seen on the windowsill, walls and dressers. An observation was made behind Resident #4's dresser of a heavy growth of dark brown/black dusty-like debris on the floor by the baseboards behind his dresser. Staff A, housekeeping, returned to the room and was witnessed moving the dresser to sweep the debris on the floor. Staff A, housekeeping through an interpreter's phone, stated she sees roaches all the time. Photographic evidence obtained. On [DATE] at 10:52 a.m., an interview was conducted with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-13 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interviews, and review of the Plan of Correction (PoC) the facility failed to ensure it had a functioning Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) plan. The facility was actively involved in the creation, implementation, and monitoring of their PoC for deficient practice identified during a complaint survey on 05/13/2025. The plan was ineffective resulting in citation F908 being recited related to ensuring timely repairs of essential equipment, for one roof-top Air-Conditioning (A/C) unit (#11) of 19 roof- top A/C units and F908 being recited related to failure to ensure equipment was safe, sanitary and operational, and failure to provide a safe, functioning, sanitary and comfortable environment in resident's rooms for six residents (#5, #6, #7, #11, #12 and #13) out of 15 residents sampled, and in common areas to include food storage areas. Findings included: A review of an undated facility policy titled, Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI), showed a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-13 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure timely repair of essential equipment, two (#5 and #19) roof top air-conditioning units of 19 roof top air-conditioning units. Findings included: An interview was conducted on 5/13/2025 at 10:30 a.m. with the facility's Maintenance Director. He stated the facility had 19 rooftop air conditioning (A/C) units and the units were assigned numbers 1 through 19. He expressed concerns for A/C unit #19, located over the facility's North Wing near the nurse's station; A/C unit# 5, located over the facility's dining room; and A/C unit #1, located over the facility therapy gym. The Maintenance Director stated A/C unit #5, over the dining room, had been out of working order since 1/19/2025. He said if the dining room gets too warm, 81 degrees or anything above that, they move the residents to their room. The Maintenance Director stated A/C unit #19, over the North Wing nurses station, was an older unit and it started having issues at the end of 7/2024. At the end of 7/2024 or the beginning of 8/2024, A/C unit #19…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-13 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one pantry (South Wing) of three pantries and one of five eye wash stations, was maintained in a safe and sanitary manner. Findings included: On 5/13/2025 at 1:10 p.m. during the tour of the facility's South Wing, an odor of strong musty smell was identified at the rear corner of the nurses station. The odor was located near the pantry door at the rear of the nurses station. When the door was opened, a strong smell was present in the room. The room was observed to have multiple areas of water damage. (Photographic Evidence Obtained) During the observation, interviews with staff were conducted: Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) stated she could smell the odor from the pantry. She said some of the nurses will not work on the South Wing due to the odor. Staff A, LPN stated, We cannot use the pantry. The refrigerator was moved to the small activity room across from the nurses' station. We have to go to the East Wing for ice. Snacks are stored in the activity room. We do not let the residents in the activity room…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to post the nurse staffing data to ensure the information was readily accessible to all residents and visitors during three of four days of survey. Findings included: An observation on 01/29/24 at 9:00 a.m., revealed no nurse staffing data was posted in the facility. An observation on 01/30/24 at 6:00 p.m., revealed no nurse staffing data was posted in the facility. An observation on 01/31/24 at 3:00 p.m., revealed no nurse staffing data was posted in the facility. During an interview on 01/31/24 at 3:00 p.m., the Administrator stated normally the staffing coordinator would be responsible for posting the staffing numbers, however, the daily staff posting had not been getting posted with the absence of the staffing coordinator.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-01 · tag F0644 — patternCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level I for six (#61, #43, #5, #342, #48, and #45) of fifty-seven residents reviewed; and failed to ensure a PASARR Level II was completed for one (#100) of fifty-seven residents reviewed. Findings included: Review of the clinical record for Resident #61 revealed admission to the facility on [DATE], with admission diagnosis that included, but not limited to, major depressive disorder, anxiety, and adjustment disorder with anxiety as per the face sheet. Review of the PASARR dated 12/05/2023 for Resident #61 revealed no diagnosis checked in Section I A (mental illness or suspected mental illness). Review of the clinical record for Resident #43 revealed admission to the facility on [DATE], with admission diagnosis that included, but not limited to, depression as per the face sheet. Review of the PASARR dated 12/15/2023 for Resident #43 revealed no diagnosis checked in Section I…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observations, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all grievances were tracked through to their conclusions for two residents (#56 and #16) of seven sampled residents for choices. Findings included: On 1/29/2024 at 12:48 PM an observation of Resident # 56's room revealed an un-opened box containing an electric wheelchair sitting at the foot of the resident bed against the wall. An interview was conducted on 1/29/2024 with Resident #56 regarding the electric wheelchair. Resident #56 stated,They haven't hooked it up for me. It's just sitting in the box. Look at it. I can't get around if I wanted to. I would like to go to activities. It's been sitting here since September. A review of Resident #56's medical record revealed the following progress note: 12/14/2023 at 11:30 AM: Social Service Note Resident has an electric scooter /chair in her room and was given the okay to use it by the Administrator. She is unable to use a regular wheelchair due to immobility reasons. Rehab Director…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#120) out of four residents reviewed for falls had the comprehensive care plan revised with additional interventions after a fall. Findings included: An observation on 01/29/24 at 10:13 a.m. showed Resident #120 had a bruised left eye. During an interview on 01/29/24 at 10:13 a.m., Resident # 120's Family Representative (FR) stated Resident #120 obtained her black eye from a fall roughly a week and half ago. Resident #120's FR stated the fall occurred in the bathroom. Resident #120's FR stated he asked staff about maybe bed rails or other interventions to be put in place so Resident #120 didn't fall again but the facility said Resident #120 could not have bed rails because that would be considered a restraint. Review of the facility's Incident Log for January 2024 showed Resident #120 had a fall on 01/19/24. Review of the admission Record showed Resident #120 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services related to accessible emergent tracheostomy supplies at the bedside and providing oxygen as ordered for one resident (#109) out of one resident reviewed for tracheostomy care. Findings included: Review of Resident #109's admission Record revealed she was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Her medical diagnoses included Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting the right dominant side, encounter for attention to tracheostomy, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, dysphagia, and need for assistance with personal care. An observation was conducted on 01/29/24 at 11:05 AM. Resident #109 was observed to be in bed, looking around the room, with her head of bed elevated, breathing comfortably. Resident #109 was observed to have a tracheostomy tube in place. She was receiving 28% humidified oxygen with the oxygen concentrator set on two liters via trach…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a clean, comfortable, home-like environment in three of four community shower rooms, one of one dining rooms, and resident rooms in two of three units, on four of four days observed (1/29/2024, 1/30/2024, 1/31/2024 and 2/1/2024) during the survey. Findings included: 1) On 1/29/2024 at 9:30 a.m. and 2:00 p.m.; On 1/30/2024 at 7:45 a.m.; On 1/31/2024 at 10:00 a.m.; and on 2/1/2024 at 9:00 a.m., tours were conducted in the South Unit Community Shower Room which revealed the following: --Two of three white plastic (PVC) and plastic webbed backed shower chairs were observed with black and pink biogrowth on the under seat railing, the joints of all four legs, and heavy black biogrowth on all four legs at and near the wheel castors. --The plastic webbed backing of the chairs were observed with a white biogrowth coating. --The walls in the room at and near the shower stalls, especially at the baseboards, revealed many holes and gouges…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-01 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#106) out of three residents reviewed received scheduled dialysis treatments as ordered in accordance with professional standards. Findings included: A review of the medical record for Resident #106 revealed the resident was re-admitted to the facility after hospitalization on 12/17/2023 with a diagnoses to include: End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD), alcoholic cirrhosis of liver with ascites, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, and dependence on renal dialysis. A review of Physician orders for Resident #106 revealed the following: -Hemodialysis (HD)-Resident receives HD every (Monday and Friday at [name of facility], chair time is 10:45 a.m. -Hemodialysis- right chest - [Type of catheter] dialysis access port/line. Monitor site for s/s (signs and symptoms) of infection, pain, drainage, increased temp, edema . Notify physician of abnormal findings -Hemodialysis -right/ chest - [Type of Catheter] dialysis access port/line. HD center to complete…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-01 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5.00%. Forty-three medication administration opportunities were observed, and twenty errors were identified for three residents (#30, #65, and #101) out of five residents observed. These errors constituted a 46.51% medication error rate. Findings included: On 1/30/2024 at 8:20 a.m. an observation of medication administration with Staff H, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), was conducted for Resident #30 The staff member dispensed the following medication: 1. Amoxicillin-Pot Clavulanate Tablet 875-125 milligram (MG) Tablet (Tab). 2. Prednisone 20 mg Tab 3. Budesonide Inhalation Suspension 0.5 MG/2 milliliters (ML) Inhalation 4. Isosorbide Mononitrate Extended Release (ER) Tab 30 MG (2 Tabs) 5. Colace Oral Capsule (Cap)100 MG Over the counter (OTC) 6. Guaifenesin ER Tab 600 mg OTC 7. Eliquis Tab 5 MG (medication was not available in the medication cart) 8. Diltiazem ER Coated Beads 180 MG Cap 9. Lasix 20 MG Tab 10. Gabapentin 400 MG Cap 11. Ipratropium-Albuterol…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review and facility failed to ensure allegations of neglect involving one resident (#106) out of one sampled resident for dialysis was reported immediately to the governing agency in accordance with State law and thoroughly investigated. Findings included: On 1/30/24 at 5:12 p.m., an interview was conducted with Staff K, Registered Nurse (RN). Staff K stated he worked with Resident #106 quite often. Staff K stated the resident was alert and oriented, and used to go to dialysis on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday, but now goes on Thursday and Friday. The nurse stated Resident #106 received peritoneal drainage on 11pm to 7am shift. Staff K, RN stated sometime in December 2023, on a Tuesday, the police had come to speak with the resident because someone had called to report Resident #106 had missed too many dialysis appointments. Staff K, RN said, I was here, he was missing dialysis appointments. The police interviewed him. The problem was lack of transportation. The police resolved it. I believe it turned out to be miscommunication issues. Staff K stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to evaluate and analyze hazards and risks, implement interventions to reduce hazards and risk, monitor for the effectiveness of the interventions, and ensure neurological monitoring was completed after a head injury for one resident (#48) out of two residents sampled. Findings included: A family interview was conducted on 01/29/24 at 10:23 AM. He said a couple weeks ago the resident fell from his bed and hit his head on the dresser and that is why there is a hole in his dresser. The family member said Resident #48 had a bruise on the right side of his forehead because of the fall. An observation was conducted on 1/29/24 at 10:23 AM, during the family interview, and Resident #48 was observed to be in bed looking around the room, wearing a hospital gown. The bed was in the lowest position, there was a fall mat only on the right side of the bed. There was no fall mat on the left side of the bed. The dresser was observed to be pushed against…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-14 · tag F0569 — patternNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to convey and provide a final accounting of personal funds within 30 days of discharge for three (#5, #7, and #8) of three residents reviewed. Resident #5 was discharged from the facility on 10/29/2023, as of 12/13/2023, Resident #5's patient trust account had $4,442.73 in it and his room and board bill documented he was due a refund of $736.80. Resident #7 was discharged from the facility on 01/20/2023, as of 12/13/2023, Resident #7's patient trust account had $1249.69 in it. Resident #8 was discharged from the facility on 04/26/2023, as of 12/13/2023, Resident #8's patient trust account had $45.00 in it. Findings included: A review of Resident #5's clinical chart, the face sheet, documented an admission of 12/16/2022 and a discharge date of 10/29/2023. A review of Resident #5's profile, listed a Power of Attorney (POA) for care and financial, with home and cell phone number. A review of Resident #5's Discharge summary, dated [DATE], documented Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-14 · tag F0568 — isolatedProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure personal funds were accurately billed or adjusted for Room and Board (Care Cost) for one (#2) of six sampled residents. Findings included: On 12/13/2023 at approximately 2:00 p.m., Staff A, Registered Nurse (RN) was interviewed. She confirmed Resident #2 was on her assignment. She stated the resident was able to be interviewed at times. She was unable to say if he was able to make medical decisions, but, if there was a change in condition, she would notify the resident's [family member]. An attempt to interview Resident #2 was conducted with Staff A present. Resident #2 was observed in his bed. He stated he was hard of hearing. The attempt at an interview with Resident #2 was unsuccessful. Staff A stated he can hear better some days than others. A review of Resident #2's clinical record documented he had resided in the facility from 05/2021 and had been transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. The admission record documented he was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-14 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to implement the grievance policy and procedure for one (Resident #2) of ten sampled residents. Findings included: A review of the facility's Standards and Guidelines: Grievances-Resident Rights, last revised 06/2023, documented the Standard: Residents and their representatives have the right to file grievances, either orally or in writing, to the facility staff or to the agency designated to hear grievances (e.g., the state Ombudsman). Guideline: The Administrator and staff will make prompt efforts to resolve grievances to the satisfaction of the resident and/or representative. The procedure included, Upon receipt of a grievance and/or complaint, the Grievance Officer will review and investigate the allegations and submit a report of such findings to the Administrator within five (5) working days of receiving the grievance and/or complaint. The resident, or person filing the grievance and /or complaint on behalf of the resident, will be informed (verbally and/or in writing as per request) of the findings of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment by not ensuring 1. resident closet room doors in three rooms (228, 231 and 328) were functioning, 2. HVAC (Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning) system filters in 12 resident rooms (303, 304, 306, 307, 309, 311, 319, 320, 323, 324, 325, and 326) were free of dust and debris, 3. walls, floors, closet ceiling (resident room [ROOM NUMBER]), handrail, an electrical outlet, resident room furniture and trim molding were maintained in two units (300 and 200) of three units to include nine resident rooms (317, 309A and 217P, 326, 328, 330, 332, 333, and 334), and 4. An overhead wall light and cover worked and had a light pull cord for use for one resident (#56) for a total of four days (4/11/2022 to 04/14/2022) four days observed. Findings included: 1. An observation was conducted of resident room [ROOM NUMBER] on 4/11/2022 at 12:37 p.m. The observation revealed sliding doors to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident smoking supplies were secured and residents adhered to designated smoking times for seven residents (#40, #9, #57, #4, #68, #78, and #81), on four (4/11/2022, 4/12/2022, 4/13/2022, and 4/14/2022) of four days observed Findings included: During an observation of Resident #40's room on 4/12/2022 at 11:20 AM. a full pack of cigarettes was noted on the resident's bedside tray table. (Photographic evidence obtained.) According to admission records, Resident #40 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including alcohol abuse, anxiety, adult failure to thrive, emphysema, and personal history of adult neglect. Review of Resident #40's Minimum Data Set (MDS) Section C (Cognitive Patterns) indicated her Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score is 15, indicating resident is cognitively intact. Review of Resident #40's care plans indicated a care plan in place for smoking, potential for injury. Interventions included monitor for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-04-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility 1. failed to store medications securely and appropriately in five medication carts (East Hall Medication Cart #1, North Hall Medication Cart #2, East Hall Medication Cart #3, South Hall Medication Cart #1, and South Hall Medication Cart #2 ) of seven medication carts and one of one treatment cart on the South Hall, and 2. failed to ensure controlled substances were stored in a permanently attached container in two refrigerators (East Hall and North Hall) of three refrigerators used for storage of medications; and 3. failed to appropriately secure medications for four residents (#98, #85, #46 and #40) of 61 sampled residents. Findings included: 1. A facility policy titled, Medication Storage In The Facility, with a revision date of January 2018, was reviewed and revealed the policy for Storage of Medications as: Medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly, following manufacturer's recommendations or those of the supplier.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-14 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program for two units (300 and 200) of three units related to small flying insects, ants, and wasp like insects for four days (4/11/2022, 4/12/2022, 4/13/2022, and 4/14/2022) of four days observed. Findings included: 1. On 4/11/2022 at 11:30 a.m. and 1:40 p.m. the restorative dining/activity room on the 300 Unit was observed. There were four tables with chairs, which have been used at times by residents for various activities. The windowsill at the back of the room and in between the two large sliding glass doors was observed with over ten small ants crawling on the windowsill, the window and wall. In addition, ants were observed to crawl on the table that was placed under the windowsill. (Photographic Evidence Obtained) On 4/12/2022 at 7:55 a.m. the restorative dining/activity room on the 300 Unit was again observed with many small ants at and near the windowsill in between both sliding glass doors. Ants…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to implement care plan interventions with relation to bed rail use and bed rail monitoring for seven of sixty-one sampled residents (#64, #43, #40, #62, #38 and #56, and #55), during four of four days observed (4/11/2022, 4/12/2022, 4/13/2022, and 4/14/2022). Findings included: 1. On 4/11/2022 at 10:15 a.m. Resident #64 was observed in his room and in bed. He was observed lying in low bed, flat and under the covers with his feet hanging off the right side of the bed. There were ½ bed rails/enablers up and in position. Both side rails appeared not secured and loose fitting. Once the bed rails/enablers were handled, it was found they swayed approximately two to three inches from side to side. It was determined that they were not tightened enough next to the bed frame to ensure resident positioning safety. On 4/12/2022 at 10:00 a.m., 1:10 p.m. and 4/12/2022 at 7:40 a.m. and 11:10 a.m. Resident #64's room was observed, and he was noted in low…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. According to the clinical record, Resident #22 was admitted on [DATE] and included diagnoses of hypertension and pneumonia. An observation was conducted at 9:25 a.m. on 4/11/22 of Resident #22's nebulizer equipment. The observation indicated a nebulizer mask with an attached medication cup was lying on top of electronic equipment on the resident's bedside dresser, uncovered. The medication cup had droplets of residual liquid in it. On 4/12/22 at 9:17 a.m., an observation of Resident #22 identified nebulizer equipment lying on top of the resident's bedside dresser. The nebulizer mask was not in a protective bag and had liquid residual in the attached medication cup. Resident #22 was observed, on 4/13/22 at 9:35 a.m., lying in bed. A nebulizer mask was lying on the bedside dresser with liquid residue in the medication cup. During an interview with Staff Member W, Unit Manager/Registered Nurse on 4/13/22 at 10:40 a.m. she viewed Resident #22's nebulizer equipment lying on the bedside dresser and said it should…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-14 · tag F0732 — isolatedPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and policy review the facility failed to ensure Nursing Staffing Information was posted for three days (04/08/22, 04/09/22 and 04/10/22). Findings included: Upon entrance to the facility on [DATE] at 9:00 a.m. the required Nursing Staff Posting was observed on the wall in front of the Nursing Home Administrator's (NHA) office titled, Daily Staffing Levels, with a date of 04/07/22 (Photographic Evidence Obtained). On 04/14/22 at 11:30 a.m. an interview was conducted with Staff Y, Staffing Coordinator. He confirmed he was responsible for posting the Nursing Staff, daily. He stated he worked on 04/08/22 but forgot to post the required daily staffing sheet. He confirmed the weekend supervisor was responsible to post the daily staffing sheet on 04/09/22 and 04/10/22. Review of a facility policy titled, Posting Direct Care Daily Staffing Numbers, with a revision date of 07/2016, revealed the following policy statement: Our facility will post daily for each shift, the number of nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-14 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5.00%. Twenty-five medication administration opportunities were observed, and two medication errors were identified for two (Residents #98, and #275) of seven residents observed. These errors constituted an 8.00% medication error rate. Findings included: Facility-provided policy titled Specific Medication Administration Procedures, revised January 2018, Page 125, under Metered Dose and Dry-Powder Inhalers revealed: Q. For Steroid inhalers, provide resident with cup of water and instruct him/her to rinse mouth and spit water back into cup. On 04/12/2022 at 09:48 a.m., an observation of medication administration with Staff G, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), was conducted with Resident #98. Staff G, LPN was observed administering Advair Diskus 100-80 microgram (MCG)/Dose Aerosol Powder 1 puff by mouth. Once the medication was completely administered by Staff G, LPN, she did not ensure the resident rinsed her mouth, and spit out the contents afterwards. An…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to ensure the wound care for one (#44) of twelve residents with wounds was completed in a sanitary manner to promoted healing. Findings included: Resident #44 was admitted on [DATE]. The admission Record included diagnoses not limited to Parkinson's Disease, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus without complications, and End Stage Renal Disease. A Weekly Wound Evaluation, dated 4/7/22, identified a Diabetic Right Heel ulcer that measured 1.5 x 2.5 x 0 centimeter (cm). The evaluation indicated a small/minimal serous exudate with a wound bed of 26-50% granulation and 26-50% necrotic tissue. The physician's order, dated 4/4/22, for treatment identified the following regarding the dressing of the right heel: Silver alginate packed Right (R) heel, Abdominal (ABD) roll gauze three (3x) times a week (wk). Cleanser of choice, Return to Clinic (RTC) 2 weeks, and offload Right heel. The Treatment Administration Record (TAR) instructed staff to Cleanse Right…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$18,070 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $8,490 — penalty dated 2025-05-13
- $9,580 — penalty dated 2025-05-13
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to ASTON HEALTH — 38 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.7 | -1.7 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 4.1 | -1.1 vs chain |
The other 37 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.7★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CW CARE HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 05/07/2018 |
| CITADEL CARE GROUP LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 05/07/2018 |
| WILDES, DONNA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 08/28/2025 |
| BELL-MORRIS, JULIE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/05/2025 |
| CAMPBELL, JENNIFER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 11/05/2025 |
| COLIP, NATHAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/05/2025 |
| WILSON, CONSTANTINA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 11/05/2025 |
| ASTON HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2022 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 70% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $3.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in FL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 105453. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-02-01, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.