The Estates At Bloomington LLC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

40.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 42 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 44.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 25 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 41% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 68 beds and averages 65.9 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.33 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.13 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.81 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.02 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.45 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.17 to 1.01 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

33 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-01-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to implement transfer interventions for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for accidents. This resulted in actual harm for R1 who hit her head and sustained a skin tear on the left forearm. Findings include: R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated R1 required extensive assistance of two staff with the use of a mechanical lifting device for transfers. R1's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicated a score of 15, cognitively intact. R1's care plan last revised on 10/03/23, indicated R1 had a diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis, adult failure to thrive, hypertension, depression, anxiety, obesity, and peripheral vascular disease. Self-care interventions included transfer assist of two using a mechanical lift. A progress note, dated 07/12/23, indicated that R1 fell during a transfer with the mechanical lift due to a strap falling off. R1 fell onto the wheelchair. R1 hit her head and sustained a skin tear on her left forearm. R1…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure dignity was maintained for 2 of 2 residents (R9, R13) reviewed for dignity when staff failed to knock, introduced themselves, and wait for permission to enter resident rooms prior to entry.Findings include: R9R9's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified R9 with dementia, psychosis and dependent on staff for all cares. In addition, R9 was enrolled in hospice.R13R13's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified R13 was cognitively intact and had diagnoses of fibromyalgia, anxiety, depression and chronic pain.During observation and interview on 4/20/26 at 2:30 p.m., the State Agency (SA) surveyor was in process of screening R13 in their room which was shared with R9. The bedroom door to hallway was closed and a privacy curtain was pulled around R13 who was lying on bed. Nursing assistant (NA)-A entered the room with R9 who was seated in Broda wheelchair. During this time NA-A failed to knock, introduce herself, and wait for permission to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY During observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accommodate resident needs by ensuring the call light was accessible for 1 of 1 residents (R9) reviewed for call lights.Findings include:R9R9's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified R9 with impaired cognition, no limitation in upper extremity range of motion and dependent on staff for turning, repositioning, transfers, and all personal cares. R9's diagnoses include dementia. In addition, R9 was enrolled in hospice.During observation on 4/20/26 at 2:30 p.m., nursing assistant (NA)-A wheeled R9 into the middle of their room without placing a call light in reach and then turned around and left the room without speaking. R13's call light was on R13's bed which was approximately 15 feet away. During interview upon leaving R13's room, NA-A confirmed R13 was not able to use her legs and would not have been able to reach the call light while seated in the middle of the room. During observation on 4/21/26 at 9:00 a.m., R9 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to provide a written transfer notice and notice of bed hold for 1 of 1 residents (R4) reviewed for hospitalization.Findings include:R4's admissions Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] identified R4 with impaired cognition, required assistance with all personal cares, and diagnoses of hemiplegia (form of paralysis affecting one side of the body), diabetes and anxiety.R4's electronic medical record (EMR) progress notes lacked indication of a hospitalization or emergency room visit since admission to facility on 2/18/26.R4's hospital after visit summary dated 4/14/26, identified R4 was transferred to the emergency room for diarrhea.During interview with R4 on 4/20/26 at 1:27 p.m., R4 stated she had had a hospitalization for diarrhea recently but did not know what the date was. In addition, R4 could not recall whether she was offered or provided a transfer form or bed hold notice at the time of the emergency room visit.R4's emergency contact was called on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement, or revise as needed, a comprehensive, person-centered care plan with individualized interventions for 1 of 1 resident (R67) reviewed for fluid management, related to the resident's diagnosis of polydipsia (excessive, persistent thirst or compulsive, excessive water consumption) and ongoing fluid-seeking behaviors Findings include:R67's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated R67 was admitted to the care facility on 10/25 and had severe cognitive impairment. R67's Diagnoses, dated 10/25/24, indicated R67 had a diagnosis of polydipsia. R67's care plan, dated 10/29/24, indicated a risk versus benefit form was completed and on file for R67 for not following the recommended diet related to the diagnosis of polydipsia. The care plan also indicated R67 was observed trying to get drinks from other residents and drinking water out of the bathroom sink. The care plan contained interventions, dated 3/24/25 of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate and complete respiratory care documentation and resident-specifc ordered settings for the use and management of a BIPAP device (bilevel positive airway pressure device - a non-invasive ventilation machine to helps in breathing) for 1 of 1 resident (R17) reviewed for respiratory care. Findings include:R17's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated R17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 (indicating intact cognition), and utilized a non-invasive mechanical ventilator.R17's physician orders, printed 4/23/26, indicated an order for a BIPAP machine to be applied at bedtime (HS), to remain on during nocturnal hours, and to be removed in the morning. Additional orders directed staff to change the BIPAP water daily, including emptying, drying, and refilling the chamber with distilled water to the fill line without overfilling each evening shift. Weekly orders…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure non-pharmacological interventions were attempted and recorded prior to the administration of as-needed (PRN) narcotic/opioid and non-narcotic medication to help facilitate person-centered care planning and reduce the risk of complication (i.e., constipation, sedation) for 2 of 6 residents (R5, R28) reviewed for unnecessary medication use. Findings include: R5 R5's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/19/26, identified R5 had intact cognition with no hallucinations, delusions, verbal or physical behaviors. R5 did reject cares 1-3 times during observation period. In addition, the MDS outlined R5 received both scheduled and PRN pain medications during the review; however, did not receive any non-medication intervention for pain. Further, R5 indicated they had occasional pain which they rated at four (4) out of 10 (10 being the worst possible). R5's care plan, initiated on 3/17/26, identified R5 had an alteration in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY During observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a safe, comfortable, and homelike environment for 2 of 2 residents (R9, R13) reviewed whose main bedroom ceiling light did not function properly.Findings include: R9R9's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified R9 with impaired cognition, no limitation in upper extremity range of motion and dependent on staff for turning, repositioning, transfers, and all personal cares. R9's diagnoses include dementia. In addition, R9 was enrolled in hospice. R13R13's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified R13 with intact cognition and diagnoses of fibromyalgia, anxiety, depression and chronic pain.During observation and interview with R13 on 4/20/26 at 2:31 p.m., R13 pointed to flickering ceiling light and stated it had not worked for a long time. R13 stated she was frustrated, to have that strobe light [NAME] on and off which caused her headaches. R13 stated she had to currently use the pull string light over the head of her bed instead,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure community use glucometers (machines to check blood sugar) were properly cleaned and disinfected between patient use, and failed to ensure staff who performed blood glucose checks were knowledgeable of process for cleaning and disinfecting blood glucose devices prior to and after use per manufacturer instructions. This had the potential to affect 9 of 9 (R10, R13, R15, R26, R29, R41, R49, R54, and R118) residents who were diabetic, had orders for blood glucose monitoring, and used a community glucometer. Findings include: The manufacturer's instructions for use of the Arkray Assure Platinum Blood Glucose Monitoring System in Section B: To reduce the chance of infection, the clinician is to, Wash hands thoroughly with soap and water before putting on a new pair of gloves and performing the next patient test. And, prior to obtaining blood sample, Step 1: Wash patient's hands with soap and warm water. Guidelines for cleaning and disinfecting the unit state, To minimize the risk of transmitting blood-borne…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a comfortable and homelike environment for 2 of 2 residents (R19, R23) who shared a room with a large area of the wall patched but left unfinished, unsanded, and unpainted. Findings include: R19's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R19 had intact cognition. R23's annual MDS dated [DATE], identified had intact cognition. During observation and interview on 1/27/25 at 6:01 p.m., a shared wall of R19 and R23's room had an area of white joint compound that measured one hundred and three inches long by thirty-seven inches tall spanning most of the wall. The area was not sanded, smoothed out, or painted to match the rest of the wall and room. R23 stated, the wall has been like this since [sic] moved to this room in October of 2024. During interview with registered nurse (RN)-B on 1/28/25 at 10:01 a.m., RN-B stated she was familiar with all the residents. RN-B stated there was an expectation of staff to notify the maintenance staff…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
  Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure dental appliances (i.e., dentures) were offered or provided to promote safety and independence with eating for 1 of 4 residents (R60) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). Findings include: R60's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified R60 had severe cognitive impairment and demonstrated no rejection of care behaviors. Further, the MDS outlined R60 needed substantial and/or maximum assistance to complete oral hygiene (inc. dentures). R60's most recent MHM (Monarch Healthcare Management) Oral/Dental Evaluation, dated 11/18/24, identified R60's oral cavity had no issues and R60 used an upper and lower denture with their condition being recorded, Good condition. R60 was recorded as edentulous (no natural teeth) and a summary outlined, Resident wears full upper and lower dentures. He denies pain with chewing. He is dependent on staff to perform oral hygiene. No mouth sores noted with oral inspection. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MONARCH HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT — 45 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MN