The Gardens At Winsted LLC
551 Fourth Street North, Winsted, MN 55395 · For profit - Corporation · 70 certified beds · (320) 482-3135 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (41) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $8,021 in federal fines (most recent 2024-01-25)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- about 17% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 23.2% | 18.2% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.1% | 4.1% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 3.4% | 1.9% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.8% | 2.6% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 8.9% | 4.1% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.5% | 4.0% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 37.1% | 20.5% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 10.0% | 12.5% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 96.1% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 7.0% | 5.2% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 31.8% | 24.5% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 22.5% | 17.1% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 3.0% | 1.9% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 78.7% | 82.7% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 22.7% | 23.5% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 43.1% | 14.8% | 12.0% | check this† — see note marked dagger below the table |
† This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
46.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 59 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 82.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 29 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.40 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 68% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 46.6%CMS range 36.9–56.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.8%CMS range 7.2–16.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 82.8% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 62.1% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 55.2% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 8.3% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.8% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.8%CMS range 3.6–11.5 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.10 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 70 beds and averages 38.9 residents a day — about 56% occupied, or roughly 31 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.36 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.07 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.87 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.03 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.49 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.21 to 0.72 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
41 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 30 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for 1 of 3 residents (R1) who were at risk for elopement. This resulted in an immediate jeopardy (IJ) however, the facility implemented corrective action prior to the investigation so the deficiency remained at past non-compliance. The IJ began on 1/17/24 at 7:09 p.m. when the administrative hallway exit door alarm sounded and staff did not respond appropraitely. At 7:36 p.m. R1 on was located outside, approximately 15 feet from the building. AccuWeather temperature identified it was between 10 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and -3 degrees F on 1/17/24. The facility administrator and director of nursing (DON) were notified of the IJ on 1/25/24 at 3:02 p.m. The facility had implemented corrective action on 1/22/24, prior to the start of the survey and was issued at past non-compliance. Findings include: R1's Face Sheet printed 1/25/24, indicated diagnoses which included malignant neoplasm of the brain, and reduced mobility. R1's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-01 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure there are a sufficient number of nursing personnel to provide care and respond to each resident's basic needs as required by the resident's diagnoses or plan of care resulting in delayed responses to call lights and an inability to provide timely care. The failure affected multiple residents (R1, R5, R6, R8, R9) and placed all residents at risk for unmet care needs, avoidable discomfort, and potential decline.Findings include:R1's admission comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1 had no cognitive impairment, was receiving diuretic medication, and required partial/moderate assistance with toileting and transfers.During an interview on 4/29/26 at 3:47 p.m., R1 stated when she pressed her call light button, she sometimes had to wait at least an hour before anyone responded. R1 reported these delays made her feel as though staff had forgotten about her. R1 further stated on one occasion she was experiencing shortness of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-01 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for 1 of 3 residents (R7) reviewed for non-pressure related skin injuries.Findings include:R7's order summary report dated 2/12/26, identified R7's diagnoses included respiratory failure with hypoxia, a stage 3 pressure ulcer stage to spine, and colostomy/ileostomy. The order summary included an order for weekly skin inspection by licensed nurse every Monday on day shift.R7's admission comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1 had no cognitive impairment, was receiving surgical wound care, and required substantial/maximal assistance with toileting and transfers.Review of R7's March and April 2026 Treatment Administration Record (TAR) showed check boxes indicating weekly skin check tasks were completed on 3/16/26, 3/23/26, and 4/13/26. However, there was no corresponding skin assessment documentation to support whether…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-08-15 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure the facility assessment included the required components of involvement from direct care staff, considering staffing needs of each unit in the facility, and a plan to recruit and retain staff. This had the opportunity to affect all 33 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility assessment, dated 7/22/24, failed to include input and active involvement from direct care staff, including but not limited to registered nurses (RN), licensed practical nurses (LPN), and nursing assistants (NA). The document indicated the following people were involved in completing the assessment: administrator, director of nursing (DON), Governing Body representative, the medical director, the pharmacist, and residents/resident representatives/family members through letters, family council and resident council. The facility assessment failed to consider staffing needs for each unit in the facility and failed to consider staffing needs for each shift. The document indicated acuity needs of residents was reviewed and evaluated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to maintain residents' dignity for 2 of 3 residents (R4, R5) reviewed for dignity when it took 20 minutes for staff to answer call lights causing R4 and R5 to become incontinent. Findings included: R4's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), dated 4/11/25, indicated he was cognitively intact. R4's care plan, dated 4/29/25, indicated R4 was frequently incontinent of bladder and occasionally incontinent of bowel. It also indicated R4 was on diuretic and BPH medications. The care plan directed he required assistance of two staff with full ceiling lift, provide assistance with peri cares, provide incontinent products, and assist to change as needed. The care plan directed a toileting schedule of every two hours on the odd hour, during waking hours. R4's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated he had diagnoses of heart failure, benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH, an enlarged prostate gland), hemiparesis (weakness on one side), and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to develop and implement interventions to maintain continence for 2 of 3 residents (R4, R5) reviewed for care plans. Findings include: R4's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), dated 4/11/25, indicated he was cognitively intact. R4's care plan, dated 4/29/25, indicated R4 was frequently incontinent of bladder and occasionally incontinent of bowel. R4 was on diuretic and benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) medications. The care plan directed he required assistance of two staff with full ceiling lift, provide assistance with peri cares, provide incontinent products, and assist to change as needed. The care plan directed a toileting schedule of every two hours on the odd hour, during waking hours. R4's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated he had diagnoses of heart failure, benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH, an enlarged prostate gland), hemiparesis (weakness on one side), and morbid obesity. The MDS indicated he was dependent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure residents incontinent of bladder and bowel received services to maintain continence when 2 of 3 residents (R4, R5) reviewed for continence care did not receive timely care, resulting in bladder incontinence. Findings include: R4's care plan, dated 4/29/25, indicated R4 was frequently incontinent of bladder and occasionally incontinent of bowel. It also indicated R4 was on diuretic and BPH medications. The care plan directed he required assistance of two staff with full ceiling lift, provide assistance with peri cares, provide incontinent products, and assist to change as needed. The care plan directed a toileting schedule of every two hours on the odd hour, during waking hours. R4's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), dated 4/11/25, indicated he was cognitively intact. R4's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated he had diagnoses of heart failure, benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH, an enlarged prostate gland),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to report an allegation of sexual abuse to the State Agency (SA) within two hours, as required, for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed. Findings include: R1's quarterly Minimal Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1 had diagnoses which included paraplegia, neurogenic bowel (neurological condition disrupt the normal communication between the brain and colon, leading to difficulties in controlling bowel movements), and major depressive disorder. R1 was cognitively intact and did not exhibit any behaviors. Review of facility report number 360763 to the SA dated 6/6/25 at 1:07 p.m., indicated R1 reported she used the call light to request assistance with a brief change. She was turned onto their left side and participated in the repositioning by gripping the grab bar on that side of the bed. R1 indicated the nursing assistant (NA), while cleaning the resident, informed her that they needed to see how much stool was coming out. R1 reported the NA put their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-18 · tag F0943 — isolatedGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure contracted agency staff were trained on the facility's abuse policy and annual abuse training which had the potential to affect all 37 residents currently residing in the facility at the time of the survey. Findings include: Review of facility report number 360763 to the SA dated 6/6/25 at 1:07 p.m., indicated R1 reported she used the call light to request assistance with a brief change. She was turned onto their left side and participated in the repositioning by gripping the grab bar on that side of the bed. R1 indicated the nursing assistant (NA)-C, while cleaning the resident, informed her that they needed to see how much stool was coming out. R1 reported the NA-C put his right hand on her right hip and with the left hand put his finger into her anus. R1 reported they have never had anal sex but the way the NA-C put his finger in and out of R1's anus was anal sex to them. R1 described the sensation of the finger entering her as painful and upsetting. Further, report identified registered nurse (RN)-A was made…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to perform hand hygiene and change gloves appropriately for 1 of 1 residents (R2) observed for personal cares. In addition, the facility failed to develop a trending and tracking program system for monitoring residents who showed signs of illness, but were not on an antibiotic, these practices had the potential to affect all 37 residents currently residing in the facility. Findings Include: R2's 3/21/25, significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) identified her cognition was severely impaired, and she was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADL)s. R2 had diagnoses of anemia (low levels of red blood cells (which carry oxygen to the tissues) which causes weakness and fatigue), hypertension (high blood pressure), arthritis (inflammation of the joints), neuropathy (nerve pain which can lead to pain, weakness, or numbness), and urinary retention. R2's care plan initiated 2/24/25, identified R2 had enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) in place due to use of an indwelling catheter. Enhanced barrier…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-01 · tag F0576 — patternEnsure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure resident mail was delivered to residents on Saturdays for 2 of 2 residents (R3 and R28) who voiced concerns with mail delivery during Resident Council. This had the potential to affect all 37 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 4/30/25 at 3:00 p.m., a Resident Council meeting was held with six residents from varied areas of the facility. During the meeting, R3 voiced a concern mail was not delivered to residents on Saturdays. This was verified by R28. R3 indicated mail was delivered to the facility on Saturdays and was placed in the black box outside of the front entrance. Historically, this was then gathered on Monday morning and delivered by the receptionist. This process has changed somewhat since the position of receptionist was not currently filled. On 5/1/25, at 9:53 a.m. the business office manager (BOM) affirmed the mail is delivered by the post office to the outside collection box. BOM stated the business office gets it Monday, as the key is locked up for the post office box outside.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 30 citations
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-01 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and documentation, the facility failed to identify personal activity preferences, develop resident specific care plan, and coordinate activities of interest for 5 of 5 residents (R3, R22, R28. R31,and R36 ) reviewed for activities. Findings include: R3 R3's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/2/25, indicated R3 was cognitively intact and was readily able to communicate her thoughts, needs and wishes. R3's quarterly assessment of 4/4/25, indicated R3 had lower extremity deficit in mobility and was able to get around with the use of a wheelchair. R3's medical diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy (brain dysfunction caused by systemic metabolic disturbances), anemia (a disease caused by low red blood cells that can cause shortness of breath and fatigue), hypertension (high blood pressure), diabetes mellitus (a group of disease that affect how the body uses blood sugar), arthritis (swelling or tenderness of one or more joints), multiple sclerosis (a chronic disease…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure a self-administration of medications assessment was completed, and orders obtained, for all medications kept at bedside for 1 of 1 residents (R9) observed with medications at their bedside. Findings include: R9's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R9 was alert and oriented and able to communicate her needs. The MDS lacked any indication of behavioral concerns. R9 was able to complete activities of daily living (ADLs) independently, except for meeting her toileting and bathing needs. R9's medical diagnoses included anemia (low levels of healthy cells to carry oxygen), depression (a mood disorder with symptoms of sadness), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with acute exacerbation (a persistent respiratory disease that may cause long-term, progressive lung damage), insomnia, nicotine dependence, chronic pain syndrome, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), osteoporosis, unspecified fall, history of cerebral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolatedHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to act and ensure voiced concerns in the resident council were addressed in a timely manner. This had potential to affect 6 of 6 residents (R8, R28, R33, R7. R3, and R11), identified to have attended the meetings in the past two months. Findings include: On 4/30/25 at 8:32 a.m., the resident council president (R7) gave permission for the survey team to review previous minutes of resident council meetings. These minutes were provided and identified the following concerns: October 14, 2024: No resident attendance roster included in the meeting minutes. Concerns identified related to Therapeutic Recreation: Identified goal to get more activities/crafts for residents. November 11, 2024: No resident attendance roster included in the meeting minutes. Concerns identified related to Therapeutic Recreation: Trying to get more games and exercises going. More crafting. Bingocize has stopped. Bingo is transitioning. December 9, 2024: No resident attendance roster included in the meeting minutes. Concerns identified related…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based record review and interview the facility failed to follow up on grievances for 1 of 1 residents (R7) reviewed for grievances during the period 9/7/24 to 5/1/25. Findings include: On 4/30/25 at 3:14 p.m., during Resident Council, the question was asked: If the facility does not respond to concerns, does the Grievance Official provide a rationale for the response. R7 stated he was aware of the grievance process, and had filed multiple grievances, however, stated the last grievances, he did not received a response. A request was made for the grievance log from the past six months, as well as the resolutions of the grievances received. A log was received from 10/24/25 to 5/1/25. During this time, grievances were filed by R7 on 9/7/24, 11/18/24 (twice, for separate issues), 12/15/24, 12/15/24, 12/21/25, and 1/13/25. A resolution form was completed for the grievance of 9/7/24, with documentation completed on 10/14/24, which identified Grievance confirmed. The documentation indicated: investigation was ongoing and told resident [we] would continue to check in. Additionally, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure the hospice plan of care had been integrated with the facility care plan for 1 of 1 resident (R2), identified to receive hospice services. Findings include: R2's 3/21/25, significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) identified her cognition was severely impaired, and was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADL)s. R2 had diagnoses of anemia (low levels of red blood cells (which carry oxygen to the tissues) which causes weakness and fatigue), hypertension (high blood pressure), arthritis (inflammation of the joints), neuropathy (nerve pain which can lead to pain, weakness, or numbness), and urinary retention, . A review of R2's current care plan identified R2 was on hospice, however, lacked indication as to what services hospice provided during their visits to the facility. Although the facility care plan directed staff to refer to Hospice plan of care and visit schedule, the medical record lacked this information for staff reference. During interview on 5/1/25 at 8:54 a.m., hospice nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to implement appropriate monitoring of wanderguard function for 1 of 1 residents (R32) reviewed for elopement. Additionally, the facility failed to assure proper ongoing storage and use for e-cigarette (inhaled nicotine) device were implemented for 1 of 5 residents (R9) reviewed for smoking. In addition, the facility failed to provide supervision in the dining room during meal for 1 of 1 residents (R30) reviewed for safety while eating. Findings include: R32 R32's annual assessment of 12/13/24, indicated R32 had moderate cognitive impairment. R32's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R32 did not display episodes of inattention, disorganized thinking, or altered level of consciousness. The MDS also indicated R32 did not display physical or verbal symptoms directed toward others, or behavior symptoms not directed at others such as pacing. R2 was identified as having impairment of both lower extremities and noted to use a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to consistently communicate with dialysis department, and follow through on directions for 1 of 1 residents (R141) reviewed for dialysis Findings include: R141 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R141's brief interview for mental status assessment completed on 4/17/25, indicated he was cognitively intact. R141's diagnoses upon admission to the facility included end stage renal (kidney) disease, congestive heart failure, diabetes (a condition where the body has problems with regulating blood glucose (sugar), and post surgical treatment of left foot. A provider visit note of 4/18/25, identified: R141 was admitted following recent hospitalization for surgery to his left foot. The note also identified R141 had been hospitalized for nausea and vomiting after dialysis, with hypotension (low blood pressure) during dialysis, dark stools requiring EGD (a scope to view digestive system) (showing gastroparesis), and mild hypoglycemia (low blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and document review, the facility failed to ensure resident medical social services were provided for 2 of 2 residents (R8 and R14) whose room odors permeated the surrounding halls. This had the potential to affect residents in surrounding rooms, visitors and facility staff. Findings include: R8 In review of R8's Diagnosis Report (print date 4/30/25) documented the diagnoses of morbid obesity with alveolar hyperventilation (a condition where the lungs don't move enough air in and out, leading to a buildup of carbon dioxide (hypercapnia) and a decrease in oxygen levels in the blood, and type 2 diabetes. R8's 5-day minimum data set (MDS - post hospitalization), dated 2/12/25, indicated R8 was independent with self cares, requiring partial/moderate assistance with toileting and substantial/maximal assistance with showering/bath. In review of R8's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), resident was assessed to be cognitively intact. During screening interview on 4/28/25 at 2:12…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 5 residents (R5) reviewed for immunizations were offered and/or provided the pneumococcal vaccine series as recommended by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) to help reduce the risk of associated infection(s). Findings include: A CDC Pneumococcal Vaccine Timing for Adults feature, dated 10/24, identified various tables when each (or all) of the pneumococcal vaccinations should be obtained. This identified when an adult over [AGE] years old had received the complete series (i.e., PPSV23 and PCV13; see below) then the patient and provider may choose to administer Pneumococcal 20-valent Conjugate Vaccine (PCV20) for patients who had received Pneumococcal 13-valent Conjugate Vaccine (PCV13) at any age and Pneumococcal Polysaccharide Vaccine 23 (PPSV23) at or after [AGE] years old. R5's face sheet dated 5/1/25, indicated she was [AGE] years old. The immunization record dated 5/1/25, indicated R5 received the following pneumococcal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and document review, the facility failed to ensure resident living areas are free from odors for 2 of 2 residents (R8 and R14) in the sample whose room odors permeated the surrounding halls. This had the potential to affect residents in surrounding rooms, visitors and facility staff. In addition the facility failed to fully investigate missing personal items for 1 of 1 residents (R9) with reports of missing clothing that was reported missing for approximately two months. Findings include: R8 In review of R8's Diagnosis Report (print date 4/30/25) documented the diagnoses of morbid obesity with alveolar hypoventitlation {a condition where the lungs don't move enough air in and out, leading to a buildup of carbon dioxide (hypercapnia) and a decrease in oxygen levels in the blood}, and type 2 diabetes. R8's 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) - post hospitalization, dated 2/12/25, indicated R8 was independent with self cares, requiring partial/moderate assistance with toileting and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to ensure Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) were used for 1 of 3 residents (R3) reviewed for wound care. Findings include: R3's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], listed the following diagnoses: cancer, anemia, hypertension (high blood pressure), renal insufficiency (kidneys do not filter the blood properly, dementia (loss of memory and abilities that interfere with daily life), multiple sclerosis (autoimmune disease that affects gait a fine motor skills) and depression. R3's physician order list accessed 3/19/25, indicated that following orders: -Wound Right Heel dated 3/14/25, ordered cleanse with wound cleanser, pat dry. Apply betadine every day and as needed. Offload with offloading boot. -EBP dated 2/21/25, ordered follow EBP while providing wound cares and other high contact care activities every shift. R3's care plan dated 2/21/25, indicated R3's was currently on EBP precautions related to wounds, and staff were to don…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-24 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 residents (R5) room was kept clean to reside in. Furthermore, the facility failed to maintain sanitary condition in the dining room. This had the potential to affect all 24 residents who ate food in the dining room. Findings include: During observation on 2/20/2025 10:34 a.m. to 11:35 a.m., a significant size of brownish stains were observed on the floor under a table close to the kitchen on three spots in the dining room. R5 stated it looked gross. Also observed were a few soiled tissues on the floor, uncleaned plate on two tables in the dining room with rest of scrambled eggs and pieces of bread. Six residents sitting two by two at the tables in the dining room. During observation on 2/20/25 at 11:42 a.m., the housekeeping supervisor (HS)-A cleaned the brownish stains under the table using washcloths without gloves on and then walked out of the dining room, did not wash hands, and touched a resident at the door who was asking for water. On 2/20/25 at 2:15 p.m. (HS)-A stated she was busy today and was not able…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure personal protective equipment (PPE) was utilized for 3 of 4 residents (R1, R2, R4) reviewed for infection control concerns. Furthermore, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precaution (EBP) [measure intended to prevent the spread of multi drug-resistant organisms] was implemented for 2 of 4 residents (R1, R4) reviewed for foley catheter cares. Findings include: R1 R1's admission Record dated 6/21/2023, indicated R1's diagnoses included urinary tract infection, sepsis, and retention of urine. R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], indicated R1 had intact cognition and required moderate assistance of two persons with an easy stand (EZ) for transfers. R1's care plan dated 12/20/24 indicated R1 had foley catheter, moderate assist for toilet hygiene with staff interventions included follow EBP direction while providing urinary catheter maintenance, contact with the catheter, tubing, collection bag, and other high…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure resident's ordered medications were fully communicated to the filling pharmacy. In addition, the facility failed to ensure all licensed staff (including pool agency staff) understood and utilized the emergency medication kit (E-Kit) for 1 of 3 residents (R1) who did not have all physician ordered medications delivered from pharmacy for continuity of care. Findings include: R1's Active Diagnosis listing documented the following diagnoses: acute and chronic congestive heart failure, type 2 diabetes (insulin dependent), asthma and morbid obesity due to excess calories. R1's minimum data set (MDS) was still in process due to R1's admission on [DATE]. However, the facility had performed a Brief Interview for mental Status (BIMS) with R1, dated 12/24/24 and found to have scored 15 (cognitively intact). In review of R1's Clinical Profile (Face Sheet), R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] form Ridgeview Hospital Waconia. The hospital…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-14 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to notify the resident's representative following resident change of condition for 1 of 1 resident (R1) who had a decline in condition resulting in hospitalization. Findings include: R1's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1 had severe cognitive impairment. R1's diagnoses included diabetes, morbid obesity, anemia, edema, heart failure, altered mental status, and end stage renal disease. R1 was dependent on staff for dressing, toileting, personal hygiene, transferring, and bed mobility. The MDS also identified R1 had two stage 2 pressure ulcers (presenting as a shallow open ulcer); three stage 3 pressure ulcers (full thickness tissue loss which may include undermining or tunneling) and one unstageable pressure ulcer (known but not stageable due to coverage of wound bed by slough and/or eschar). R1's physician orders included: - Tylenol 1000 mg by mouth three times daily for pain; Tramadol 50 mg by mouth every six hours as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to effectively monitor and communicate wound status for early recognition of changes on 1 of 2 residents (R1) reviewed for worsening pressure ulcers. Findings include: R1's significant change in status Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1 had severe cognitive impairment. R1's diagnoses included diabetes, morbid obesity, anemia, edema, heart failure, altered mental status, and end stage renal disease. R1 was dependent on staff for dressing, toileting, personal hygiene, transferring, and bed mobility. The MDS also identified R1 had two stage 2 pressure ulcers (presenting as a shallow open ulcer); three stage 3 pressure ulcers (full thickness tissue loss which may include undermining or tunneling) and one unstageable pressure ulcer (known but not stageable due to coverage of wound bed by slough and/or eschar). R1's care plan initiated on 8/16/23, indicated R1 had skin alterations to coccyx, rear right thigh, left 2nd toe, and left heel.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-07 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to notify the attending physician of a change in condition for 1 of 1 resident's (R42) reviewed for new onset of hallucinations and delusions. Findings include: R42's admission minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified severe impairment in cognition with no hallucinations or delusions and diagnoses of myocardial infarction (heart attack), heart failure, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, and anemia. Hospital discharge orders dated [DATE], indicated resident was hospitalized related to confusion and condition was improving. Therapy orders for occupational, physical therapy and rehabilitation potential was good. Care plan dated [DATE], instructed staff to monitor for lethargy and increased confusion. Progress note dated [DATE] at 5:55 p.m., identified R42 admitted to the facility with a discharge plan to return home after therapies. Progress note dated [DATE] at 10:18 p.m., indicated R42 was hard to arouse and slept all shift. Progress note dated [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-07 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to follow the interventions for 1 of 1 residents (R34) reviewed for weight loss and nutrition leading to a 15 lbs (8.37%) weight loss over the course of 47 days. Findings include: R34's admission record dated 12/26/2023, indicated medical diagnoses of vascular dementia, severe with agitation; anxiety disorder; moderate protein calorie malnutrition. R34's admission weight was noted to be 125.5 lbs. on 12/16/23. R34's weight on 1/31/24 was 115 lbs., indicating an 8.37% weight loss over the course of 47 days. R34's care plan listed potential for altered nutrition status related to need for mechanically altered diet related to dysphagia; and Potential for weight loss related to altered oral intakes as evidenced by malnutrition diagnosis. Interventions indicated R34 needed staff assistance with eating and drinking. R34's record of meal intake indicated resident refused or had eaten less than 25 % of her meal for 62 out of 100 meals served from 12/26/23 through 2/7/2024. During observation on 2/5/24 at 5:22 p.m., R34…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-07 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors for 1 of 1 (R94), residents reviewed for medication orders and administration. Findings include: R94's admission minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified intact cognition, diagnoses of manic depression, bi-polar, and antipsychotic medication. admitted to the facility 9/15/23 for short term therapy following hospitalization for bi-lateral pulmonary embolisms and falls. R94's hospital discharge orders dated 9/15/23, identified an order for aripiprazole (an antipsychotic medication) 30 milligrams (mg) take 30 mg by mouth once daily for manic depression. R94's facility discharge order summary report dated 11/14/23 identified an order for aripiprazole give 30 mg by mouth two times a day (bid) related to major depressive disorder with a start date of 9/15/23. This dose is double the order identified in R94's hospital discharge orders. R94's medication administration records identified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-04-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, monitoring of refrigerator/freezer temperatures and performing proper hand hygiene during meal services. This had the potential to affect all residents, staff and visitors who ate at the facility. Findings include: On 4/2/23, at 11:50 a.m. an initial kitchen tour was completed with lead cook (cook)-A. The following areas of concern were identified. -In walk in cooler the following food items were expired and/or not labeled with dates: container of sliced Swiss cheese, with corner of container open to air, was dated 12/1 and there was approximately 6 slices of cheese that had a white powdery substance on the cheese, cook-A stated, yes it's moldy; container of coleslaw with no open date labeled on container; French onion dip labeled 2/6/23; bag of tomatoes with no date; bag of cooked bacon with no date; container of strawberries dated 2/14; open bag of sliced…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-04-06 · tag F0887 — patternEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure 3 of 5 residents (R10, R25, and R32) reviewed for COVID-19 vaccination status were offered the COVID-19 vaccine, and/or provided education regarding the risks, benefits, and potential side effects of COVID-19 vaccinations in accordance the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations. Findings include: R10's face sheet dated 4/3/23, indicated R10 had been admitted to the facility in January 2023. R10's medical record lacked evidence of COVID-19 vaccination, education, contraindication, and/or documentation of refusal by the resident or resident representative. Vaccination status had been reviewd for R10 with current immunizations scanned in from Minnesota Immunization Information Connection (MIIC). After Additional records were requested 4/3/23, the administrator provided declination form on 4/4/23 signed by resident and dated 4/3/23 after the survey enterance and after requested by the surveyor. R25's face sheet dated 4/3/23, indicated R10 had been admitted to the facility in March 2023. R25's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-06 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to notify the medical provider and resident representatives of weight loss for 1 of 1 resident (R25) reviewed for notification of change. Findings include: R25's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R25 had severe cognitive impairment and was not able to clearly communicate his needs and wishes. Further, R25 required extensive assistance for his activities of daily living (ADL's) and had several medical diagnoses including expressive language disorder (communication disorder in which there are difficulties with verbal and written expression), dysphagia (difficulty in swallowing food or liquid), chronic kidney disease, stage 4 (severe) (gradual loss of kidney function), dietary calcium deficiency, retention of urine, hypokalemia (low levels of potassium), hypomagnesemia (low levels of magnesium), essential hypertension (high blood pressure) and heart failure (a progressive heart disease that affects pumping action of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-04-06 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure confidential information was not readily available for all residents, staff, and visitors to view for 1 of 1 resident (R192) observed to have private information visible on an open computer screen in a common area. Findings include: R192's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R192 was cognitively intact and was able to clearly communicate her needs and wishes. The MDS indicated R192 required limited to extensive assistance with all activities of daily living (ADL). During continuous observation on 4/4/23, from 3:23 p.m. to 3:33 pm R192's picture and medications were displayed on an open computer screen that was left unattended on the nurse's medication cart in the common area by nurse's station. At 3:23 p.m. computer screen, on med cart, was open with R192's personal information visible on screen. At 3:24 p.m. another resident and her husband walked past the med cart and looked in the direction of the open…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to implement pressure ulcer interventions for 1 of 1 resident (R25) identified at risk for pressure ulcers. Findings include: R25's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified severe cognitive impairment with diagnosis including aphasia (difficulty speaking), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), a stroke, kidney failure, low blood potassium, low blood sodium, and heart failure. R25 required extensive assistance with mobility and did not have any pressure ulcers. R25's care plan dated 3/7/23, identified alteration in skin integrity and directed staff to apply protector on left heel when resident was in bed, monitor skin integrity daily during cares with weekly inspection by nurse, treatment to open areas per order, turn and reposition or reminders to offload q (every) 2-3 hours and PRN (as needed), pressure redistribution mattress to bed, pressure redistribution cushion to w/c (wheel chair) and chair, weekly measurements and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-06 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure residents received appropriate ongoing catheter care that adhered to professional standards of practice and infection prevention for 3 of 3 residents (R33, R22, R25) who were reviewed for indwelling urinary catheter use. Findings include: R33's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated he had moderately impaired cognition, an indwelling urinary catheter and required extensive assist of 2 with toileting and personal hygiene. R33's Waconia Ridgeview Hospital Interagency Referral Form dated 2/10/23, indicated an indwelling urethral catheter for urinary retention was placed during his inpatient hospitalization prior to returning to the facility on 2/10/23. R33's care plan dated 2/16/23, indicated the presence of an indwelling catheter and directed staff to, change catheter per physician order and when needed, to position catheter bag and tubing below the level of the bladder, to monitor and document intake and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-06 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to complete accurate assessments, interventions and ongoing weight monitoring, meal refusal monitoring and availability of fluids to address unplanned weight loss for 1 of 1 resident (R25) reviewed for nutrition and hydration. Findings include: R25's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified severe cognitive impairment, an inability to communicate needs, required extensive assist for most activities of daily living (ADL's). R25 required supervision, oversight, encouragement or cueing along with set up help for eating. R25 weighed 207 pounds and did not have any known weight loss or gain in the prior 6 months. R25 had received speech-language pathology services during the assessment period. R25 did not reject cares. It was somewhat important to R25 to have snacks available between meals. R25's diagnoses included, a stroke with aphasia (difficulty speaking), and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), low blood sodium, diabetes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, document review and interview, the facility failed to ensure supply and administration of ordered medications for 2 of 2 residents (R35 and R20) reviewed for pharmacy services. Findings include: R35's quarterly Minimum Data set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated he was cognitively intact and had a diagnosis of anxiety. R35's Care Area Assessment worksheet dated 10/27/22, indicated Psychotropic drug use and staff will continue to follow plan of care to aide in prevention and manage any potential negative outcomes related to meds including admin [administration] meds [medications] as ordered, R35's Diagnosis Report dated 4/6/23, indicated he had panic disorder and general anxiety disorder. R35's care plan focus dated 9/11/22, indicated he had an alteration in mood and behavior due to diagnoses of major depressive disorder and anxiety disorder and directed staff to provide medications per order. R35's provider visit notes dated 2/14/23, indicated he continues to report significant issues with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-04-06 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure pharmacist consultant recommendations were acted upon for 1 of 5 residents (R33) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: R33's significant change in status Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated he had moderately impaired cognition, was frequently incontinent of bowel, had a diagnoses including, Parkinson's Disease and psychotic disorder and received antipsychotics and antidepressant medications. R33's Consultant Pharmacist's Medication Review dated 11/5/22, indicated a recommendation to place standing orders for orthostatic blood pressures every month related to anti-psychotic use. The medication review indicated antipsychotics could cause orthostatic hypotension. R33's physician orders dated 4/2/23, indicated he was receiving the anti-psychotic medication Quetiapine Fumarate 12.5 mg (milligrams) two times a day for Psychosis related to Parkinson's Disease. R33's orders also indicated to monitor orthostatic blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-06 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 5 residents (R10 and R32) admitted during the 2022/2023 influenza season (October 1 through March 31) received the influenza vaccination in accordance with the Center for Disease Control (CDC) recommendations. Findings include: R10's face sheet dated 4/3/23, indicated R10 had been admitted to the facility in Jaunary 2023. R10's medical record lacked evidence of influenza immunization, education, contraindication, and/or documentation of refusal by the resident or resident representative. Vaccination status had been reviewd for R10 with current immunizations scanned in from Minnesota Immunization Information Connection (MIIC). After additional records were requested, the administrator provided a declination form signed by resident dated 4/3/23 after the start of the survey and after requested by the surveyor. R32's face sheet dated 4/3/23. Indicated R32 had been admitted to the facility in February 2023. R32's medical record lacked evidence of influenza immunization, education, contraindication, and/or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2025-05-01 · tag F0577 — widespreadAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure both recertification survey results, as well as additional complaint investigations, were available for review. This had the potential to effect all 37 residents residing in the facility, along with family, visitors and staff. Findings include: During the recertification visit of 4/28/25 through 5/1/25, the facility survey results were observed to be placed in a binder near the main entrance for review. Upon arrival to the facility, on 4/28/25 at approximately 11:45 a.m., it was noted the survey binder contained the recertification surveys from the past three years of recertification, (2022, 2023, 2024), however, lacked documentation and follow up for complaint investigations completed during those years. During interview on 5/1/25, at 7:37 a.m. interim administrator (IA) stated complaint investigations were routinely posted in the binder. A review was completed of the binder at this time by surveyor and IA, and at that time, it was noted there was additional documentation present in the binder, which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$8,021 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $8,021 — penalty dated 2024-01-25
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to MONARCH HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT — 45 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 3.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 3.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
The other 44 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.2★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 44; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NIJ LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 14% | since 04/01/2020 |
| SPARTAN HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 32% | since 04/01/2020 |
| WBS HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 22% | since 04/01/2020 |
| YAZOMA HOLDINGS, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 32% | since 04/01/2020 |
| HALPERT, MARC | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | 32% | since 04/01/2020 |
| JAFFA, NOAM | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | 14% | since 04/01/2020 |
| LEGUM, JOSHUA | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 32% | since 04/01/2020 |
| STERN, WILLIAM | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | 22% | since 04/01/2020 |
| MONARCH HEALTHCARE OPERATING X LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 04/01/2020 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MN
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Minnesota Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 245459. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-01, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.