Sleepy Eye Rehabilitati Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 48 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 60.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 38 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 32% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 61 beds and averages 51.0 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.88 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.87 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.52 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.43 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.06 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.99 to 0.58 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-05-15 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
  Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to provide a method to communicate effectively with a non-English speaking resident and educate staff on identified communication needs for 1 of 1 resident (R12) reviewed for communication. This resulted in harm for R12 who suffered loneliness, depression, isolation when describing how staff failed to allow him an opportunity to communicate in a meaningful manner and did not assure that critical information could be conveyed, such as explanation of routine care, and the ability to refuse care and services. Further, the facility failed to provide sufficient guidance for staff, including temporary staff, on how to communicate and deliver care for the R12. Findings include: R12's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R12 needed or wanted an interpreter to communicate with a doctor or health care staff, moderate cognitive impairment, no behaviors, nearly every day feeling down depressed or hopeless, nearly every day feeling…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-06 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure resident status was accurately identified in the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 1 of 2 residents (R38) reviewed for hospice. Findings include: R38's Face Sheet included diagnoses of dementia, sarcoidosis (inflammatory disorder that affects lungs) and right breast cancer. R38's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated on section O, under Other hospice stated no. Section J 1400 Prognosis: conditions or chronic diseases that may result in a life expectancy of less than 6 months was answered as no. A physician order dated 11/12/25, included a hospice order. A progress note dated 10/19/25, by licensed practical nurse (LPN)-A, included R38 was admitted to hospice care on 10/19/25 with the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. On interview 1/6/26 at 12:37 p.m., registered nurse (RN)-A, also MDS coordinator, reviewed R38's MDS dated [DATE], and stated hospice should have been answered as yes as that was the reason for the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to comprehensively assess and monitor non-pressure related skin impairments for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for skin integrity. In addition, based on interview and document review the facility failed to comprehensively assess and monitor for change in condition for 1 of 1 resident (R1) who had a change of condition and was admitted to the hospital with sepsis. Findings include:R1's face sheet dated 7/16/25, identified R1 admitted 6/2025, with diagnoses of fracture of neck of left femur (broken hip), hypertension (high blood pressure), malnutrition (not consuming enough food/fluids), gastrointestinal stromal tumor of large intestine ([NAME]) (rare cancerous tumor in digestive system), colon cancer (cancer that begins in the large intestine).R1's discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified short term memory issues and moderately impaired decision making. R1 was independent with eating, supervision/touching assistance required for oral…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to apply enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) while performing cares on 1 of 3 residents (R4).Findings include:Enhanced Barrier Precautions are a set of guidelines aimed at preventing the spread of infections caused by multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs). These precautions are particularly important in skilled nursing facilities where the risk of transmission is high due to close contact among residents and healthcare providers.R4's face sheet dated 7/16/25, identified diagnoses of acute pyelonephritis (kidney infection) and malignant neoplasm of endometrium (uterine cancer).R4's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R4 had an indwelling catheter.R4's care plan dated 5/2/25, identified R4 was on EBP related to a chronic foley catheter. Interventions included to follow EBP, use appropriate communication to follow EBP, explain reason for use of EBP, and staff to don/doff (put on and take off) EBP when providing high…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure an oxygen tank was handled safely for 1 of 1 resident (R54) reviewed for safety hazards. Findings include: R54's facesheet printed on 2/25/25, indicated R54 had been admitted on [DATE], with a diagnosis of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (inflammation of the airway causing difficulty breathing). R54's physician orders dated 2/24/25, included oxygen delivery system via nasal cannula 3-4 LPM (liter per minute) every shift. During an observation on 2/24/25 at 5:14 p.m., observed licensed practical nurse (LPN)-A, carry an E-sized metal oxygen tank, holding it to her chest with both arms wrapped around it, down hallway three. LPN-A walked from the oxygen storage room at the beginning of hallway three to the last room on hallway three. During an interview on 2/24/25 at 5:19 p.m., LPN-A stated she did not know an oxygen tank should not be carried. LPN-A was able to verbalize if dropped, an oxygen tank…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-05-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to follow manufacturer's instructions for cleaning and sanitizing 1 of 1 ice machines used for resident consumption. This had the potential to affect all 53 residents who resided in the facility. Findings include: During an interview on 5/14/24 at 9:08 a.m., maintenance director (MD)-A, stated the facility had one ice machine used for resident consumption and identified its location near the dining room. MD-A stated he cleaned the ice machine once a year using distilled water. The manufacturer's user's manual was requested. During an observation on 5/14/24 at 9:12 a.m., the ice machine was observed to be in a small room off the main dining room. It was a Scotsman brand, counter-top style ice machine. The manufacturer's user's manual provided by MD-A was reviewed for Scotsman brand ice machine, model number HID540. The recommended time between cleanings was a minimum of six months. The recommended process to clean the ice machine included use of hot water (110-120 degrees Fahrenheit) and a solution of an ice machine scale…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview staff failed to ensure a mechanical transfer lift was cleaned after resident used for 1 of 1 residents (R23) observed for infection control practices. In addition, the facility failed to ensure proper glove use and hand hygiene was preformed between resident use and proper infection prevention practices was observed when sorting soiled laundry. Findings Include: Mechanical lift R23's face sheet printed 5/15/24 included diagnoses of right humerus (upper arm), diabetes mellitus and heart failure. R23's plan of care indicated assist with transfer using 2 assist and patient lift. During observation on 5/15/24 at 7:35 a.m., nursing assistant (NA)-D and NA-C with the assist of a mechanical lift, transferred R23 from her bed to her chair. NA-D removed the lift from the room and parked it in hallway along the wall. NA-D did not clean the lift with sanitizer. NA-D then went into another resident room. NA-C exited R23's room and went to the dirty utility room. During interview on 5/15/24…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-15 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to provide sufficient staffing to ensure residents received care and assistance with activities of daily living (ADL's) as needed and requested and timely response to call lights for 11 of 20 residents (R7, R10, R13, R14, R18, R19, R24, R30, R33, R35, R47) with concerns for sufficient staffing. These deficient practices had the potential to affect all 20 residents who resided on Hall 2 of the facility. Finding include: Refer to F679: The facility failed to ensure individualized activities and activities for a non-English speaking resident were provided for 1 of 3 residents (R12) reviewed for activities. Refer to F686: The facility failed to ensure weekly comprehensive skin assessments with measurements were completed for 1 of 1 resident (R35) reviewed for pressure ulcers. Refer to F688: The facility failed to provide services to maintain and/or prevent loss of range of motion (ROM) for 2 of 3 residents (R4 and R32) reviewed for limited range of motion.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-15 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
  Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure nutrient and/or calorie substantive snacks were offered after the evening meal and before bedtime, for 17 of 17 residents residing on the memory care unit and 1 of 1 resident (R14) residing on hallway 2, when there was more than a 14-hour lapse between the dinner meal and breakfast the following day. Findings include: During observations on the memory care unit on 5/14/24 at 9:15 a.m., and 5/15/24 at 9:06 a.m., observed breakfast trays delivered by dietary staff via an enclosed cart on wheels. According to a facility mealtime schedule, breakfast was offered from 7:30 a.m., to 10:00 a.m., and supper (also known as dinner) was offered from 6:00 p.m., to 7:00 p.m. Snacks were passed/available at 10:00 a.m., 3:00 p.m., and 7:00 p.m. Based on observations, residents on the memory care unit went 15 hours (5/13/24, at 6:00 p.m. to 5/14/24, at 9:00 a.m.) between meals. During an interview on 5/14/24 at 11:40 a.m., dietary director (DD)-F…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-15 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
  Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive antibiotic stewardship program with established monitoring to help reduce unnecessary antibiotic use and reduce potential drug resistance for 12 of 20 residents (R40, R32, R35, R37, R18, R12, R45, R34, R27, R33, R23, R38) reviewed for antibiotic use. The lack of a program had potential to affect all 53 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: During an interview on 5/15/24 at 1:43 p.m., the director of nursing (DON), who was identified as infection preventionist, shared the infection and antibiotic tracking log. The log included resident name, admit date , infection type, body system of infection, symptoms, onset date, test date, result (organism colony counts for urine), antibiotic name, dose, and frequency along with start and end dates, if on transmission based precautions and date symptoms resolved. January and March 2024 did not have any infections listed. The DON indicated the previous person doing infection prevention (IP) was no longer at the facility and she had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and document review, the facility failed to ensure care-planned interventions for communication with a Spanish speaking resident were consistently implemented to reduce alteration in psychosocial wellbeing, the risk of isolation, and barriers with communication for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for (R12) communication and activities. Findings include: R12's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R12 needed or wanted an interpreter to communicate with a doctor or health care staff, moderate cognitive impairment, no behaviors, nearly every day feeling down depressed or hopeless, nearly every day feeling tired or having little energy, always feeling social isolation, no rejection of care, utilized a walker and wheelchair, required partial/moderate assistance with toileting, shower, dressing, and mobility, and diagnoses included depression and insomnia. R12's care plan dated 5/1/24, indicated R12 does not speak English, but understands some English, Spanish speaking staff…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MONARCH HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT — 45 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $250K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MN