No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

The Emeralds At Fairbault LLC

500 Southeast First Street, Faribault, MN 55021 · For profit - Corporation · 109 certified beds · (507) 332-5100 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (507) 332-5100 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0602) — cited Jul 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Jul 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (64) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (64%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
633 1st St SE · (507) 334-1951 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
200 State Ave · (507) 497-3797 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
La Regia0.4 mi
229 Central Ave · (507) 332-6818 · Call to confirm hours
Park
3rd Ave NE · (507) 334-2222 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased15.9%18.2%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.0%4.1%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder2.0%1.9%0.9%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.9%2.6%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms5.7%4.1%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.5%4.0%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened17.9%20.5%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication4.0%12.5%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%96.1%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers7.3%5.2%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control23.6%24.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table15.9%17.1%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.6%1.9%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine84.2%82.7%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission39.7%23.5%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit15.6%14.8%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.221.611.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.281.901.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 92 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

50.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
64.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.18U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.09hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 64.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 67 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 17% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF50.4%CMS range 38.0–62.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.8%CMS range 7.1–15.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge64.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge61.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge61.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge96.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.6%CMS range 4.2–11.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.941.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.87
RN hours/ resident / day
0.68
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.76
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.31
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.69
RN hoursweekends
63.8%
Total nursing turnover
59.1%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 109 beds and averages 80.9 residents a day — about 74% occupied, or roughly 28 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.31 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.87 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.76 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.05 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.42 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.95 to 0.69 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 64% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

14
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-01)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2024-02-08)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

64 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 54 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain a safe environment for 2 of 2 residents (R4, R5) who were observed with wet floors and no indication that floor was wet while either residing in room or when returning to room. Findings include:R4R4's face sheet dated 6/12/26, identified diagnoses of left femur osteonecrosis (bone cell death), difficulty in walking, and urinary incontinence.R4's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R4 had no difficulties with hearing or speech. R4 had no cognition issues. R4 had behavioral issues directed at others one to three days. R4 required supervision/touch assist with transfers.R5R5's face sheet dated 6/12/26, identified diagnoses of unspecified dementia, and weakness.R5's admission MDS dated [DATE], identified R5 had minimal hearing difficulties and wore glasses. R5 had no cognition issues. R5 required supervision/touch assist with transfers.During a continuous observation on 6/9/26 from 11:50 a.m. through 12:22 p.m.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide oral hygiene to 1 of 3 residents (R2) observed for oral hygiene cares. Findings include:R2's face sheet dated 6/11/26, identified diagnoses of displaced bicondylar fracture (break of both sides of tibia below knee which compromises knee weight bearing surface) of right tibia, displaced bicondylar fracture of left tibia, muscle weakness, and chronic pain.R2's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R2 had some difficulty with understanding and wore glasses. R2 had moderate problems with thinking and memory. R2 had no behaviors. R2 had no natural teeth and was on a mechanically altered diet. R2 was dependent on staff for oral hygiene.R2's care plan dated 6/24/25, identified R2 had alteration in dental care related to edentulous (no natural teeth or tooth fragments) status. Interventions included dental visits as needed, monitor if R2 was tolerating current diet, oral cares a.m./h.s (hour of sleep) and per R2's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow physician's orders for negative pressure wound therapy (wound vac) (device that applies gentle suction to help complex, large, or slow-healing wounds close) care for 1 of 2 residents (R1) who did not receive wound vac changes as scheduled. In addition, the facility failed to update the physician when attempt to reapply the wound vac failed for 1 of 2 residents (R1) reviewed for wound care and failed to update the physician for 1 of 1 residents (R2) who had a choking incident and required the Heimlich maneuver. Findings include:R1R1's face sheet dated 6/11/26, identified R1 had diagnoses of atherosclerosis of native arteries (progressive buildup of fatty plaque inside original, non-surgical arteries) of other extremities with ulceration, non-pressure chronic ulcer of other part of unspecified foot with unspecified severity, atherosclerosis of native arteries of extremities with intermittent claudication (muscle pain, cramping or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow infection prevention protocols including enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) when providing care to 2 of 3 residents (R2 and R4) observed during cares. Findings include: According to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC): EBP is primarily intended to apply to care that occurs within a resident's room where high-contact resident care activities, including transfers, are bundled together with other high-contact activity, such as part of morning or evening care. This extended contact with the resident and their environment increases the risk of a MDRO (multi-drug resistant organism) (type of bacteria or microbe resistant to multiple antibiotics) spreading to staff hands and clothes. Outside the resident's rooms, Enhanced Barrier Precautions should be followed when performing transfers and assisting during bathing in a shared/common shower room and when working with residents in the therapy gym, specifically when anticipating close…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure care plan interventions related to anticoagulant therapy were effectively communicated to direct care staff responsible for observing and reporting changes in condition and failed to develop a comprehensive individualized care plan that addressed cardiac management for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for quality of care who had a significant cardiac history and administered blood thinning medications. Findings include:R2's face sheet identified the following diagnoses; acute diastolic congestive heart failure (sudden worsening of heart failure where the heart becomes stiff and cannot fill with blood properly, leading to fluid buildup), personal history of transient ischemic attack (TIA) temporary blockage of blood flow to the brain causing stroke-like symptoms), cerebral infarction without residual deficits (stroke with no lasting effects), atrial fibrillation (abnormal heartbeat that can cause blood clots or stroke), presence of aortocoronary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a timely comprehensive cardiac assessment and response when 1 of 3 residents (R2) exhibited acute cardiac symptoms and requested emergency medical evaluation, which resulted in delayed provider notification and emergent hospital transfer, reviewed for quality of care. Findings includeR2's face sheet identified the following diagnoses; acute diastolic congestive heart failure (sudden worsening of heart failure where the heart becomes stiff and cannot fill with blood properly, leading to fluid buildup), personal history of transient ischemic attack (TIA) temporary blockage of blood flow to the brain causing stroke-like symptoms), cerebral infarction without residual deficits (stroke with no lasting effects), atrial fibrillation (abnormal heartbeat that can cause blood clots or stroke), presence of aortocoronary bypass graft (heart bypass surgery to restore blood flow around blocked arteries), hypertension (high blood pressure),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure complete and accurate documentation in the medical record when a nurse failed to document a cardiac assessment and the residents request for hospital evaluation for 1 of 3 residents (R2), reviewed for quality of careFindings includeR2's face sheet identified the following diagnoses; acute diastolic congestive heart failure (sudden worsening of heart failure where the heart becomes stiff and cannot fill with blood properly, leading to fluid buildup), personal history of transient ischemic attack (TIA) temporary blockage of blood flow to the brain causing stroke-like symptoms), cerebral infarction without residual deficits (stroke with no lasting effects), atrial fibrillation (abnormal heartbeat that can cause blood clots or stroke), presence of aortocoronary bypass graft (heart bypass surgery to restore blood flow around blocked arteries), hypertension (high blood pressure), ischemic cardiomyopathy (weak heart muscle caused by poor blood flow…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-07-09 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — widespread
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to implement its policy to prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents and misappropriation of property when pre-employment background screening procedures were not completed for one of 11 staff members reviewed for background screening. This had the potential to affect all 71 residents residing in the facility as the staff member worked on all units. Findings include:Findings include:Untitled undated facility personnel document, identified nursing assistant in training (NAIT)-A was a new hire for position of NAIT with start date of 1/29/25. NAIT-A's employee status was full time.Criminal Background Study Information form undated, contained personal and demographic information required to complete a criminal background study for NAIT-A. A box on the form labeled office use only contained date results received space for date to be written in. This space was blank.Review of NAIT-A's employee file did not identify a completed pre-employment background screening.Review of NAIT-A's timesheets indicated she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-09 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — pattern
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure four of five residents (R1, R4, R2, and R5) reviewed for financial exploitation were free from misappropriation of personal property and financial exploitation when facility staff stole resident credit/debit cards or card information and made unauthorized transactions totaling over $5,000. This had the potential to affect all residents residing at the facility. Findings include:R1R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated R1 had moderately impaired cognition and required partial to substantial assistance from staff for most activities of daily living (ADL's). R1's facesheet dated 7/9/25, indicated he was his own responsible party and his emergency contact was his spouse, R4. R1's diagnoses included unspecific dementia. R1's care plan dated 6/11/25, identified he was a vulnerable adult and at risk for decreased cognitive and physical abilities. Interventions included: staff will continue to follow the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure allegations of financial exploitation were reported to the State Agency (SA) within 24 hours for four of five residents (R1, R2, R3, and R4) reviewed for allegations of financial exploitation. Findings include:Findings include:R1R1's facesheet dated 7/9/25, indicated he admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was his own responsible party. R1's emergency contact was his spouse, R4.R1's care plan dated 6/11/25, identified he was a vulnerable adult. Interventions included: staff will continue to follow the facility vulnerable adult and abuse reporting policy; and local ombudsman, adult protection, police, and/or state/financial agencies will be notified of any suspected abuse or financial exploitation as needed.Nursing Home Incident Report #360867 was submitted to the SA on 6/17/25 at 2:57 p.m. The report identified an allegation of financial exploitation for resident R1. The business officer manager (BOM) was the initial reporter and became…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 54 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-09 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to identify and protect all residents at risk of financial exploitation during investigations into 4 of 4 residents (R1, R2, R3, R4) reviewed who made allegations of financial exploitation. This had the potential to affect all 67 other residents who were residing in the facility, including R5, whose representative subsequently identified and reported additional allegations of financial exploitation. Findings include:Untitled resident questionnaire documents dated 6/17/25 and 6/18/25, included dates, resident names, interviewer signatures, and three questions. Questions included: have you noticed any unusual transactions on your bank account recently; Have you noticed any missing valuables, money, checks, credit cards or debit cards recently; and do you know how to report facility concerns, lost, missing, or damaged items. Questionnaires were completed for 29 residents. One questionnaire had a resident name written down and crossed out with no further information, and one questionnaire had a resident name, R5, date of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-05-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure the three-compartment dish sink was of proper sanitization parts per million (ppm) which had the potential to affect all 76 residents who received meals from the main kitchen. Furthermore, the facility failed ensure employees wore beard restraints to prevent hair from contacting food. Findings Include: A report titled Diet/consistency Rollup printed on 4/30/25, categorized each diet and had total meals served out of the main kitchen as 76. During the initial kitchen walk through conducted on 4/28/25 at 1:22 p.m., an area over the three-compartment sink had logs for documentation of water sanitization for April 2025, completed for April 1-24th. Above the sink were two large bottles held by a wire rack with two tubes that ran down into the three compartment sink, both were empty. The bottle on the left was labeled quaternary sanitizer and the one on the right was labeled pot/pan detergent and sanitizer. A large bottle of Dawn dishwashing detergent sat on the far right of the three-compartment sink. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure soiled personal laundry and linens were bagged (i.e., contained) at the point-of-use and transported in a manner to reduce the risk of cross-contamination and potential infectious spread in 1 of 1 main washrooms and 2 of 2 units (70's, 90's) reviewed. This had potential to affect all 75 residents within the care center. Findings include: On 4/29/25 at 7:57 a.m., the campus' main laundry washroom was toured with housekeeper (HSK)-A present. HSK-A explained they were the primary person who completed laundry for the care center, and they then provided a tour of the laundry process and the machines used. The soiled linen receiving area and washroom were located on one side of the hallway and folding area (clean) on the opposite. However, in the hallway between these areas were a series of mobile, off-white colored hard plastic bins including one labeled, Soiled Linen Only, in black paint. The bin was covered with a light-blue colored cloth covering which was lifted exposing it's contents which was soiled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure dignity was maintained for 2 of 2 residents (R54, R74) who utilized urinary catheters. Findings include: R54 R54's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified R54 with intact cognition, impairment of both lower extremities, dependent on staff for toileting hygiene and lower body dressing and had an indwelling catheter (tube for urine collection from bladder to a bag outside of the body). During observation on 4/28/25 at 1:42 p.m., R74 was lying in bed with an uncovered large urine drainage bag attached to side of bed visible to the hallway. During observation on 4/28/25 at 2:39 p.m., R74 was lying in bed with an uncovered large urine drainage bag attached to side of bed visible to the hallway. Two staff walked past the room. At 5:13 p.m., a staff member pushed a meal cart past R74's room. At 5:15 p.m., one staff member was observed inside the room speaking to R74 and left the room. During observation and interview with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a sanitary and homelike environment for 1 of 1 residents (R40) whose tube feeding pole and equipment had dried, white substance on it. Findings include: R40's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R40 with intact cognition and diagnoses of depression, anxiety, chronic respiratory failure resulting in oxygen dependence, and a history of head and neck cancer with all nutrition through a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube (soft flexible feeding tube inserted through the abdominal wall into the stomach). During observation on 4/28/25 at 5:07 p.m., R40's tube feeding (TF) pole was coated with dried white substance on entire surface of the pole and all five legs of the base. The TF unit/machine had greasy smeared substance on the entire front programming screen. During interview with licensed practical nurse (LPN)-A on 4/29/25 at 1:03 p.m., LPN-A stated the nursing staff was responsible for wiping down…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure grievances were sufficiently acted upon for 1 of 1 resident (R53) reviewed for grievances. Findings Include: R53's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R53 was cognitively intact. During an interview on 4/28/25 at 4:28 p.m., R53 stated approximately two months ago, during an evening shift a nursing assistant entered her room and attempted to change an incontinent brief. R53 was concerned because she didn't wear incontinent briefs, and the aid was unkind during the encounter. The following morning R53 reported the incident to staff. During a subsequent interview on 4/29/25 at 1:28 p.m., R53 stated she filed a grievance approximately two months ago and requested the nursing assistant not return to the unit. R53 confirmed that no one from the facility followed up with the results of the grievance. R53 stated the aid did work on the unit after staff was made aware of the incident and told residents he had been off…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, observation, and documentation review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed and maintained to ensure appropriate care was provided for 1 of 1 resident (R51) reviewed for smoking. Findings include: R51's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/19/25, indicated R51 had intact cognition with no hallucinations or delusions present and no behaviors. Section J: Health Conditions indicated R51 currently used tobacco. Section O: Special Treatments and Programs indicated R51 used oxygen. R51's admission Record, printed 5/1/25, identified R51's admission date to the facility as 2/13/25. Furthermore, it identified the following relevant diagnoses: nicotine dependence, emphysema (chronic lung disease that progressively damages the tiny air sacs in the lungs), and congestive heart failure (condition where the heart doesn't pump blood as efficiently as it should). During an interview on 4/28/25 at 6:54 p.m., R51 stated she smoked cigarettes. R51 stated she had smoked for a long time. R51 stated the facility assessed me to make sure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed ensure the care plan was updated and revised to reflect current interventions for 1 of 1 resident (R62) reviewed for positioning and mobility. Findings include: R62's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R62 as independent with mobility, had no upper extremity impairment (shoulder, elbow, wrist, hand), and used a walker. R62's Occupational Therapy Discharge summary dated for services March 12, 2025, through April 9, 2025, indicated therapy was provided seven times for muscle weakness. R62's therapy involved improved strength for the left wrist, and R62 was given a brace on 4/9/25. Therapy directed R62 to wear the brace as tolerated. R62's care plan with a review date of 3/17/25, indicated a walking program of 200 feet one to three times per day with an assist of one during ambulation, bed movements, and transfers. The care plan lacked updates after R62 was discharged from therapy to walk independently with his walker…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to reassess a resident with known constipation to determine what, if any, new interventions could be put in place to prevent constipation for one of one resident (R28) reviewed for constipation. Findings include: R28's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated R28 was cognitively intact, was frequently incontinent of bowel without a bowel program, and required substantial to maximum assistance with toileting. R28's diagnoses, dated 3/7/25, indicated R28 had several medical diagnoses including Parkinson's Disease in which constipation is a common symptom. R28's bowel movements document in April indicated R28 often went three or more days in between bowel movements. R28's first documented bowel movement in April was 4/10/25, indicating 10 days without a bowel movement. R28 also did not have a bowel movement between 4/17/25 and 4/20/25 indicating three days between bowel movements, between 4/20/25 and 4/26/25 indicating 6 days between bowel…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to follow-up and implement treatment for improved hearing for 1 of 1 resident (R62) who had complaints of hearing loss which were not addressed. Findings include: R62's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R62 as highly impaired with the absence of useful hearing, did not wear hearing aids, and had a diagnosis of unspecified sensorineural hearing loss. R62's care plan initiated 9/23/24, indicated the use of a pocket talker to aid in communication, but failed to mention the use of R62's hearing aids. R62's most recent care plan with a review date of 3/24/25 indicated sensorineural hearing loss bilaterally. The care plan indicated the use of a pocket talker to aid in communication as needed and to speak clearly and distinctly to the resident, but failed to mention R62's hearing aids. R62's physician's note dated 12/12/24, indicated R62 wore hearing aids. R62's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R62…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to comprehensively reassess and, if needed, determine or develop proactive interventions to help address pressure injury risk and development after a new pressure injury was identified (i.e., change of condition) for 1 of 2 residents (R13) reviewed whom had active pressure injuries. Findings include: The Centers for Medicare (CMS) State Operations Manual (SOM) Appendix PP, dated 2/2023, identified definitions for pressure ulcer care and treatment. This included guidance provided on the several stages of injury definition which included, Stage 3 Pressure Ulcer: Full-thickness skin loss . subcutaneous fat may be visible in the ulcer and granulation tissue and epibole (rolled wound edges) are often present. Slough and/or eschar may be visible . depth of tissue damage varies by anatomical location . Undermining and tunneling may occur . R13's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified R13 had intact cognition along with multiple…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide services to maintain and/or prevent loss of range of motion and contracture care for 1 of 1 residents (R51) reviewed for limited range of motion. Findings include: R51's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/19/25, indicated R51 had intact cognition with no hallucinations, delusions, behaviors or rejection of care. In addition, R51 had no impairment in function limitation in range of motion, utilized a wheelchair for mobility, dependent on staff for lower body dressing and dependent on staff for transfers. R51's admission Record, printed 5/1/25, indicated the following relevant diagnoses: chronic pain, abnormalities of gait and mobility, dorsalgia (back pain), muscle weakness, disease of spinal cord, restless sleep syndrome and cervicalgia (neck pain). During an interview on 4/28/25 at 6:51 p.m., R51 stated she was not getting physical therapy (PT). R51 stated she had been getting occupational therapy (OT) but hadn't received any OT in probably at least two weeks. R51 expressed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to ensure a resident with a catheter had medical justification for continued use and failed to attempt a trial removal, if recommended, for one of one resident (R35) reviewed for indwelling catheter. Findings include: R35's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated R35 had moderate cognitive impairment, required supervision with toileting and moderate assistance with bathing and had an indwelling catheter in place. R35's admission MDS, dated [DATE], indicated R35 was admitted with an indwelling catheter in place. R35's Diagnoses, dated 5/16/22, indicated R35 had several medical diagnoses related to potential need for an indwelling catheter including other obstructive and reflex uropathy which can hinder the normal flow or urine, unspecified retention of urine, renal hypoplasia (a congenital condition in which one or both kidneys are underdeveloped), benign prostatic hyperplasia with and without lower urinary tract symptoms (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and document review the facility failed to comprehensively reassess a resident for pain who was hospitalized for concerns with her pain medication and had pain medication changes, and who still reported frequent pain for one of one resident (R1) reviewed for pain. Findings include: R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated R1 was cognitively intact and independent with most activities of daily living (ADLs). The MDS further indicated during the look back period R1 received scheduled pain medication, no PRN (as needed) pain medications, and was in pain almost constantly which effected R1's sleep and day to day activities. R1's Orders indicated R1 had several medications for pain including: Buprenorphine HCl Sublingual Tablet Sublingual, give 2 milligrams (mg) sublingually one time a day for chronic pain syndrome, dated 4/11/25; Oxycodone HCl Oral Tablet 5 mg, give 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for Chronic pain/Nonacute pain and give 2 tablets by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately assess a resident after a change in condition for one of one resident (R1). License practical nurse (LPN)-A noticed a change in condition at 8:00 a.m. on 3/4/25, started taking vital signs at 10:30 a.m., and emergency medical services (EMS) was not called until 11:33 a.m. Findings include: R1's face sheet indicated R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of acute cystitis with hematuria. R1's additional diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute kidney failure, hallucinations, chronic respiratory failure, dependence on supplemental oxygen, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with exacerbation. R1 was discharged from the facility on 3/4/25. R1's admission hospital medical records indicated R1 was admitted to the hospital from [DATE] to 2/25/25 due to covid-19, urinary tract infection, and encephalopathy. It was noted during her admission that her skin was warm and dry. No skin concerns…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain an order for oxygen for one of seven residents (R1) who was on continuous oxygen. Findings include: R1's face sheet indicated R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of acute cystitis with hematuria. R1's additional diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, covid-19, chronic respiratory failure, dependence on supplemental oxygen, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with exacerbation, and obstructive sleep apnea. R1 was discharged from the facility on 3/4/25. R1's admission hospital medical records indicated R1 was admitted to the hospital from [DATE] to 2/25/25 due to covid-19, urinary tract infection, and encephalopathy. R1 was to resume home regimen including oxygen as needed to keep oxygen saturation from eighty-eight percent to ninety-four percent. R1 was on two liters of oxygen via nasal cannula. R1's progress note dated 2/25/25, indicated R1 was admitted to the facility and used two liters of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure allegation of a potential drug diversion was recognized and reported to the state agency (SA), reviewed for misappropriation of property. Finding s included: R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R1 was cognitive and had a diagnosis of narcolepsy (a rare neurological condition that makes people very sleepy during the day and can cause them to fall asleep suddenly). R1's order summary dated 1/6/25, identified an order for methylphenidate long acting (LA) (a stimulant medication to help with narcolepsy) 20 mg capsule to be given every day in the morning for narcolepsy. R1's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated 1/6/25, identified R1 did not receive methylphenidate extended release (ER) 20 mg capsule as indicated by the number, 5 documented that indicated to see progress note. It was documented from 1/6/25 to 1/20/25, that R1 received his methylphenidate daily as indicated by nurse initials. R1's progress…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-22 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to put a protection plan in place and thoroughly investigate an allegation of drug diversion for 1 of 1 resident (R1), reviewed for misappropriation of property. Finding s included: R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R1 was cognitive and had a diagnosis of narcolepsy (a rare neurological condition that makes people very sleepy during the day and can cause them to fall asleep suddenly). R1's order summary dated 1/6/25, identified an order for methylphenidate long acting (LA) (a stimulant medication to help with narcolepsy) 20 mg capsule to be given every day in the morning for narcolepsy. R1's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated 1/6/25, identified R1 did not receive methylphenidate extended release (ER) 20 mg capsule as indicated by the number, 5 documented that indicated to see progress note. It was documented from 1/6/25 to 1/20/25, that R1 received his methylphenidate daily as indicated by nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the necessary coordination of services between the facility and the hospice agency for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for hospice services. Findings include: R1's admission minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated intact cognition with diagnoses of cancer, malnutrition, and depression. R1 required moderate assist with transfers and maximal assist with toileting, bathing, and dressing. R1 was at risk for pressure ulcers but had not pressure ulcers. R1 had pressure relieving device in bed and chair and received medication or ointment to skin. R1 was on hospice. On 10/17/24 at 4:00 p.m., R1's medical record lacked current medication list with a list of medication-specific hospice covered medications, a care plan, goals for care, hospice certification, the hospice election form, hospice aide visits and hospice orders. During an interview on 10/17/24, hospice RN (HRN-A), stated the hospice was handling R1's pressure issues and had not been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to report an allegation of sexual abuse immediately (within two hours) to the State Agency (SA) for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for abuse. Findings include: R1's admission Record dated 6/17/24, indicated R1's diagnoses included pain in left shoulder, weakness, history of falling and chronic kidney disease. R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated R1 required extensive assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) and had intact cognition. R1's care plan dated 6/17/24 indicated R1 was at risk for abuse with interventions including staff to follow facility vulnerable adult policies and procedures, and the State Agency will be notified of any suspected abuse. On 9/4/24 at 12:21 a.m. R1 stated he was sexually abused on 8/23/24 when a female nurse touched his penis inappropriately after putting a cream on his left hip. He was pissed off and not happy about the situation. He requested the nurse manager in his room and told him about…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-05 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of sexual abuse was thoroughly investigated and adequate resident protection provided to ensure safety for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for abuse. Findings include: R1's admission Record dated 6/17/24, indicated R1's diagnoses included pain in left shoulder, weakness, history of falling and chronic kidney disease. R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated R1 required extensive assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) and had intact cognition. R1's care plan dated 6/17/24 indicated R1 was at risk for abuse with instruction to staff to follow facility vulnerable adult policies and procedures. R1's medical record lacked evidence of the incident being investigated. On 9/4/24 at 12:21 a.m. R1 stated he was sexually abused on 8/23/24 when a female nurse touched his penis inappropriately after putting a cream on his left hip. He was pissed off and not happy about the situation. He requested the nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-18 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 resident (R5) who was observed to have medications in his room, had been appropriately assessed and deemed safe to self-administer medications. Findings include: R5's admission record, indicated history of a heart disease, morbid obesity and type 2 diabetes. R5's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated R5 was cognitively intact, had clear speech, could understand and be understood. R5 was dependent upon staff for most activities of daily living other than set up for eating and oral hygiene. R5's June medication administration record (MAR) and treatment administration record (TAR) indicated 9:00 a.m. oral medication orders: 1. Cardizem CD capsule extended release 24-hour 120 milligram (mg) Give 1 capsule by mouth one time a day, dated 9/25/23. 2. Digox oral tablet 125 microgram (mcg) give 0.125 mg by mouth one time a day. Dated 9/25/23. 3. Losartan Potassium oral tablet 50 mg. Give 1 tablet by mouth…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow the standards of practice for the: (1) administration of nebulizer treatment solution and do the necessary assessment during and after the administration of the nebulizer treatment solution; and (2) failure to follow physician order to apply compression stockings daily for one of one resident (R8) observed for medication administration. Findings Include: R8's admission record indicated R8 had a history of acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and history of pulmonary embolism. R8's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R8 was cognitively intact, had clear speech and was able to understand and be understood. MDS also indicated R8 had not exhibited rejection of cares. Resident's care plan for activities of daily living (ADL's) dated 6/18/24, indicated intervention of resident is able to put compression stockings on with help of a sock aide. R8's medication administration…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and observation, the facility failed to provide pharmacy services for 1 of 1 resident (R6), who did not receive her scheduled medication for pain resulting in uncontrolled pain and the use of narcotic pain medication. Furthermore, the facility failed to follow safeguards to ensure residents received the correct medications for 1 of 1 resident (R6). R6's admission record indicated R6 had a history of perforation of the intestine, encounter for surgery on the digestive system, gastrostomy status and colostomy status. R6's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated she was unable to complete the cognitive assessment and was sometimes understood and sometimes able to understand. MDS also indicated R6 to have pain and used as needed pain medication (PRN) in the last 5 days. R6's medication administration record (MAR) dated June 2024, indicated she was supposed to receive acetaminophen 1000 milligrams (mg) every 6 hours via percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-18 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a provider order for a urine analysis with urine culture (UA/UC) and sensitivity had been obtained in a timely manner for 1 of 1 resident (R7) reviewed for change of condition. Findings include: R7's admission record indicated a history of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, and chronic kidney disease. R7's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R7 was cognitively intact, had clear speech and was understood and able to understand others. R7's provider order dated 6/13/24, indicated R7 required a UA/UC with sensitivity related to diagnosis of dysuria. R7's medication administration record (MAR) and treatment administration record dated 6/2024 indicated an order for UA/UC had been put in on 6/14/24 and had check marks with initials noted for the evening and night shift for 6/14, 6/15, 6/16, and 6/17. No documentation noted for the day shift. Leaving open holes on the day shifts. R7 progress note date…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure routine bathing and personal hygiene needs were addressed and completed for 3 of 5 residents (R47, R69, R31) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs) and who were dependent on staff for their care. Findings include: R47's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified R47 had intact cognition and demonstrated no delusional thinking during the review period. Further, the MDS outlined R47's care plan, dated 11/21/23, identified R47 had a self-care deficit due to a mobility decline and listed a goal for R47 to accept assistance with all self cares. The care plan including several interventions to help meet this goal including, Bathing Preferences: Tub bath or shower, day or evening, once weekly. Further, the care plan outlined R47 needed assistance with dressing and personal hygiene needs. On 2/5/24 at 2:08 p.m., R47 was interviewed about their care at the facility and she expressed frustration as they hadn't…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure 1 of 5 medication carts were kept locked or under direct observation of authorized staff in areas where residents, staff and guests could access medications. The deficient practice had the potential to affect all 13 residents that resided on the second floor of the facility. Findings include: Electronic communication (email) from the assigned Ombudsman (official/advocate appointed by the Minnesota Board on Aging) for the facility on 2/2/24 stated, Of note, I did observed a RN station that was unattended; unlocked med drawers and confidential information displayed on a pc [personal computer] screen. During observation and interview on 2/5/24 at 5:25 p.m., licensed practical nurse (LPN)-A walked away from second floor medication cart with pills in a medication cup and entered a resident room at the end of the hall. The medication cart was unlocked and laptop left open with patient identifying information visible to the 5 residents seated in the dining room eating their dinner. During interview, LPN-A stated the open…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure dignity was maintained for 1 of 1 residents (R20) who utilized a urinary catheter. Findings include: R20 quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated intact cognition and diagnoses of malnutrition, coronary artery disease (narrowing of blood vessels supplying the heart), hypertension, obstructive uropathy (difficulity fully voiding), depression and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. In addition, R20 was documented requiring an indwelling catheter. R20's care plan dated 8/11/23, indicated, Foley catheter care per policy. During observation and interview on 2/5/24 at 2:09 p.m., R20 was laying in bed with a large urinary catheter bag attached to bed frame facing the hallway. No privacy bag was noted on the bed or on the wheelchair. R20 stated the facility did not offer or provide a cover for his catheter drainage bag while in his bedroom or out in the facility's hallway. During interview with registered nurse (RN)-A,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure resident and/or resident representatives participated in the resident care planning process and subsequent development of interventions for 2 of 2 residents (R53, R74) reviewed for participation in care planning. Findings include: R53 R53's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated that R53's Brief Interview for Mental Status was left blank. The MDS indicated that R53's short- and long-term memory were ok and R53 was independent with decision making. The MDS indicated that R53 was diagnosed with diabetes, a heart dysrhythmia (irregular heart rhythm), a stroke, and a seizure disorder. R53's Care Conference Form dated 1/9/24, indicated the form was completed for R53's admission care conference and included blank sections for medication assessment, physical restraints, fall risk, positioning, exams (dental and eye, bowel, bladder/bladder and bathing, immunizations, IDT (interdisciplinary team) care conference summary, nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to assess a resident for the ability to self-administer medications with an albuterol inhaler bedside for one of one residents (R43) reviewed for self-administration of medications. Finding include: R43's quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], indicated R43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was cognitively intact. R43's Physician Orders, dated 7/3/23, indicated an order for Albuterol Sulfate HFA Inhalation Aerosol Solution 108 (90 Base) MCG/ACT (Albuterol Sulfate) - two puffs every four hours as needed for shortness of breath. R43's electronic medical record (EMR) lacked evidence of a self-administration of medication assessment and order for R43 to self-administer the albuterol inhaler. During observation and interview on 2/5/24 at 2:59 p.m., an albuterol inhaler, dated 9/22/23, was sitting on R43's bedside table. R43 stated a staff member had brought it in for her to take awhile ago and never took it back out. During…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to develop and implement a system to help facilitate resident' choice and preference with regards to provided therapy services scheduling for 2 of 2 residents (R34, R58) reviewed who expressed concerns with how such services were provided. Findings include: R34's significant change in status Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified R34 had intact cognition and demonstrated no delusional thinking. On 2/5/24 at 3:32 p.m., R34 was interviewed and stated she admitted to the care center from the hospital following a stroke several months prior. R34 voiced frustration and stated she felt she did not get a very good chance at therapy before she had been discharged from the service and attributed that to, in part, the lack of a set schedule or routine when therapy would be provided adding therapists would often just come in whenever. R34 stated she liked having a routine with her cares and having a therapy schedule would have helped her participate more…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to provide ambulation services to maintain and prevent decline of function for 2 of 2 residents (R58 and R69) reviewed who required assistance with ambulation. Additonally, the facility failed to provided an exercise range of motion (ROM) program for 1 of 1 resident (R43) reviewed for ROM. Findings include: R69's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R69 had intact cognition and diagnoses of dementia, diabetes, and stroke. In addition, R69 had impairment to one side of both his upper and lower extremities and utilized a walker or wheelchair for mobility. R69's hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE], indicated R69 was involved in car accident on 7/10/23 with two left rib fractures, a thoracic (neck) vertebral fracture, and chronic compression fractures to lower thoracic vertebra (lower back bone). In addition, R69 experienced a fall at the hospital on [DATE] which resulted in a left femoral neck (hip) fracture. R69's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to comprehensively assess a resident for safe smoking practices for 1 of 1 resident (R44) reviewed for smoking. Findings include: R44's quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], indicated R44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], had moderate cognitive impairment and was independent with activities of daily living. R44's care plan, dated 10/2/22, indicated R44 currently smoked in the facility, would follow the smoking policy, and have a smoking evaluation per facility policy and as needed. R44's smoking assessment, dated 7/18/23, indicated R44 was currently identified as a smoker but did not have any smoking materials so was not assessed for safe smoking practices. During an interview on 2/5/24 at 2:41 p.m., R44 stated she smoked daily, either outside the front or back entrance, and would often get cigarettes from her roommate. During an interview on 2/7/24 at 9:47 a.m., nursing assistant (NA)-D stated she first noticed R44 smoking when…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess to determine what, if any, interventions were needed or available to help reduce the risk of recurrent urinary tract infections (UTI) for 1 of 2 residents (R34) reviewed who had multiple, repeated infections. Findings include: A Mayo Clinic 5 Tips to Prevent a Urinary Tract Infection article, dated 6/2022, identified the most common symptoms of a UTI were painful urination, tenderness above the bladder area, and frequent or urgent urination. The article outlined, Women are at greater risk for a UTI . UTIs also are more common in postmenopausal women because low estrogen levels change vaginal and urethral tissue to increase the risk of infection . It's always better to prevent an infection rather than simply treat it. The article included tips which were identified as having, . with little or no potential negative side effects. These included drinking plenty of fluids (i.e., at least 50 ounces daily), taking…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure scheduled medication administration times reflected the actual, current physician orders to reduce the risk of administration error or complication (i.e. GI upset) for 1 of 5 residents (R34) reviewed for unnecessary medication use. Findings include: A Mayo Clinic Metformin (Oral Route) Proper Use article, updated 2/1/24, identified the medication was used to treat high blood sugar levels caused by diabetes mellitus. The article listed a section labeled, Proper Use, which directed to take the medication with meals to reduce the risk of stomach or bowel side effects which were most common during the first few weeks of treatment. R34's significant change in status Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified R34 had intact cognition along with several medical conditions including gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD; a digestive disease in which stomach acid or bile irritates the food pipe lining) and diabetes mellitus. R34's most recent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure acute, potentially distressing psychoactive symptoms were recorded and non-pharmacological interventions were attempted or recorded prior to the administration of as-needed (i.e., PRN) psychotropic medication for 1 of 5 residents (R34) reviewed for unnecessary medication use. Findings include: R34's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified R34 had intact cognition and demonstrated no hallucinations or delusional thinking during the review period. Further, the MDS outlined R34 received antidepressant medication and anticoagulant medication (to thin the blood) but did not receive anti-anxiety medication during the review period. R34's most recent Order Summary Report, signed 1/21/24, identified R34's current physician-ordered medications and treatments. This included orders for gabapentin (an anti-convulsant medication) daily, paroxetine (an antidepressant medication) daily at bedtime, along with an order which read,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure recommended pneumococcal vaccinations, as outlined by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), were offered and/or provided to reduce the risk of severe disease for 3 of 5 residents (R43, R44, R47) reviewed for immunizations. Findings include: A CDC Pneumococcal Vaccine Timing for Adults chart dated 3/15/2023, identified various tables when each (or all) of the pneumococcal vaccinations should be obtained for adults 65 years and older as outlined: -The chart indicated when a resident had received no prior pneumococcal vaccines, they should receive the pneumococcal 20-valent Conjugate Vaccine (PCV20) or the pneumococcal 15-valent Conjugate Vaccine (PCV15). -The chart indicated that when a resident with an immunocompromising condition had received the Pneumococcal 13-valent Conjugate Vaccine (PCV13) at any age, the pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine 23 (PPSV23) at less than 65 years, and it had been eight weeks or more since the previous PCV13…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-12-01 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to meet assessed needs and reduce the risk of adverse event (i.e., skin breakdown, range of motion decline, poor hygiene) for 1 of 2 residents (R13) reviewed for pressure ulcer care; 3 of 5 residents (R40, R43, R44) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs); 3 of 3 residents (R32, R40, R44) reviewed for range of motion (ROM); 3 of 4 residents (R43, R28, R44), and 8 of 8 staff members (NA-R, NA-S, NA-T, RN-O, NA-C, NA-Q, RN-F, RN-B) who expressed concerns about the lack of sufficient nursing staff at the nursing home. Findings include: ASSESSED NEEDS NOT MET: R13's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated R13 had severe cognitive impairment, required extensive assistance with bed mobility, and was dependent on two staff members for all transfers. Further, the MDS indicated R13 was at risk for pressure injury development and had one unhealed stage IV pressure ulcer (defined as full…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to implement appropriate infection control protocols for 1 of 1 resident (R26) following diagnosis and confirmation of Influenza A. This had the potential to affect all 71 residents of the facility. Findings include: The current Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) guidelines for Influenza, identified a resident who tests positive for Influenza should be immediately placed on standard and droplet precautions and if possible a private room. Standard precautions include performing hand hygiene before and after touching resident or environment, wearing gloves if hand contact with respiratory secretions or potentially contaminated surfaces is anticipated, and wearing a gown if soiling of clothes with a resident's respiratory secretions is anticipated. Droplet precautions include wearing facemask upon entering residents' room and if resident movement or transport is necessary, have the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-01 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to arrange for safe transfers out of bed for 1 of 1 resident (R52) reviewed for accommodation of needs. Findings include: R52's Face Sheet dated 12/1/22, indicated she was admitted on [DATE]. R52's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R52 was cognitively intact. The MDS indicated transfers did not occur for R52 in the look back period of seven days. R52's admission Data Collection assessment dated [DATE], indicated R52 weighed 374 pounds, and was weighed by a Hoyer lift (a mobility tool used to help with people with mobility challenges to get out of bed, or move from surface to surface safely) scale. The assessment further indicated R52 transferred with the assistance of two or more people and used a wheelchair for mobility. R52's noted bathing preference was a tub bath. R52's baseline care plan dated 5/11/22, indicated assist with mobility in and out of bed and assist with transfers with a Hoyer lift. R52's care plan dated 5/13/22,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed, and maintained to ensure appropriate care was provided for 1 of 1 residents (R18) reviewed for dialysis; and 1 of 1 residents (R13) reviewed for hospice care coordination. Findings include: R18's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated R18 had intact cognition and required limited assistance of one staff for dressing, supervision with one-person physical assistance for personal hygiene and was independent for all other activities of daily living (ADLs). Section O Special Treatments and Programs indicated R18 was on dialysis while a resident in the facility. R18's diagnoses included chronic heart failure (CHF), end stage chronic kidney disease (CKD), diabetes, and chronic embolism and thrombosis (blood clots). R18's Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 11/11/22, indicated R18 triggered for ADL function. R18's care plan dated 10/3/22, indicated R18 was on a therapeutic diet related…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-01 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure activities of daily living (ADLs) including weekly baths were provided for 3 of 3 residents (R40, R43, R44) who needed assistance with bathing. In addition, the facility failed to implement a communication system to ensure resident needs were met for 1 of 1 residents (R44) who's primary language was not English. Findings include: R40's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R40 had intact cognition and required limited assistance of one staff for bed mobility, transfers, and personal hygiene, and extensive assistance of one staff for dressing and toileting. The MDS indicated R40 required physical help in part of bathing and used a walker and/or wheelchair for mobility. The MDS also indicated R40 did not have a history of refusing cares during the assessment period. R40's diagnoses included major depressive disorder high blood pressure, diabetes, chronic heart failure (CHF), candidiasis (fungal growth), obesity, and chronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure routine personal hygiene (i.e., shaving) and meal set-up was offered or provided to 1 of 4 residents (R5) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs) and who was dependent on staff for care. In addition, the facility failed to ensure personal hygiene and incontinence care was provided to 1 of 1 resident (R13) who had bowel incontinence and required staff assistance for care. Findings include: R5's Face Sheet dated 12/1/22, indicated a diagnosis of dementia. R5's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R5 was moderately cognitively impaired, and required supervision, oversight, or cueing for ADLs and set-up for meals. R5's care plan printed dated 3/30/21, indicated R5 had a self-care deficit related to weakness and memory issues and indicated staff assist with personal hygiene. The care plan did not mention R5 required meal set-up. R5's nursing assistant (NA) care sheets lacked instruction for shaving or meal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-01 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to comprehensively reassess and develop or implement meaningful and engaging activities for 1 of 3 residents (R13) reviewed who had an expected decline in condition and could no longer participate in activities as once prior. Findings include: R13's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified R13 had severe cognitive impairment and was almost totally dependent on staff for her activities of daily living (ADLs). R13's most recent MHM (Monarch Healthcare Management) Activity Participation Review, dated 9/19/22, identified R13 passively participated in group gatherings and independent leisure activities. R13 was recorded as tiring easily, being non-verbal, and needing assistance to attend activities. The assessment outlined R13 had attended religious gatherings, being read to, rest and relaxation, listening to television/music within the past 30 days. Further, a section labeled, Activity Plan Review, identified R13's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess and provide interventions for developed skin irritations for 1 of 1 resident (R37) reviewed for non-pressure skin concerns. In addition, the facility failed to approrpiately monitor hydration-related interventions for efficacy to reduce the risk of urinary tract infection (UTI) for 1 of 1 resident (R19); and failed to ensure adequate and appropriate coordination of care with an outside hospice agency for 1 of 1 resident (R13) reviewed for hospice care. Findings include: SKIN IRRITATION: R37's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated no skin issues, but indicated ointment was applied to skin other than to the feet. R37's face sheet dated 12/1/22, listed R37's current medical diagnoses, which did not include any mention of skin issues. R37's provider active orders dated 7/25/22, indicated Nystatin powder [anti-fungal medication] under folds three times daily for yeast dermatitis [skin inflammation].…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-01 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to provide services to maintain vision for 1 of 1 resident (R52) reviewed for visual impairment. Findings include: R52's Face Sheet dated 12/1/22, indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R52's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R52 was cognitively intact, and further, indicated R52 wore corrective lenses. R52's admission Data Collection assessment dated [DATE], indicated R52 wore corrective lenses and her last eye appointment was, About a year ago. R52's Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) progress note dated 10/11/22, indicated R52 voiced concerns in need to follow up with her eye doctor. R52's progress note dated 5/18/22, indicated R52 complained of double vision and would like to be seen for some eye care. The note further indicated staff would arrange an eye care visit with either the in-house eye care provider or would talk to R52 about other options. R52's clinical record lacked evidence of a signed consent form for eye care and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to provide timely repositioning and complete weekly skin monitoring, in accordance with the care plan and assessed needs, to reduce the risk or pressure injury development and/or worsening for 1 of 2 residents (R13) reviewed for pressure injuries. Findings include: R13's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated R13 had severe cognitive impairment, required extensive assistance with bed mobility, and was dependent on two staff members for all transfers. Further, the MDS indicated R13 was at risk for pressure injury development and had one unhealed stage IV pressure ulcer (defined as full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon or muscle. Slough or eschar may be present on some parts of the wound bed. Often includes undermining or tunneling). R13's most recent MHM (Monarch Healthcare Management) Braden Scale, dated 9/15/22, identified R13 was at high risk for pressure injuries and skin breakdown and listed a section…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-01 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure 3 of 3 residents (R32, R40, R44) received restorative therapy and range of motion (ROM) exercises to prevent potential decline in ROM and/or mobility. Finding include: R32's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R32 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 99 indicating R32 was unable to complete the test. R32's diagnoses included a stroke affecting R32's right dominant side, congestive heart failure (CHF), atrial fibrillation (an irregular heartbeat increasing the formation of clots in the heart), diabetes, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), chronic kidney disease (CKD), high blood pressure, skin cancer, and lymphoma (lymph node cancer). R32's Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 6/26/22, indicated R32 triggered for communication, activities of daily living (ADLs), cognitive loss/dementia, and pressure ulcers. R32's care plan dated 6/2/22, indicated R32 had an alteration in mobility related to a stroke.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-01 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to identify, comprehensively assess, and implement interventions for 1 of 1 residents (R32) who had an unplanned weight loss of greater than 10% in three months. Findings include: R32's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified, severe cognitive impairment with diagnoses including a stroke, heart failure, diabetes and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). R32 required supervision and set up for eating. The MDS also identified R32 had a loss of liquids/solids from mouth while eating and had an unplanned weight loss of 5% or more in the previous 6 months. R32's Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 6/26/22, indicated R32 triggered for nutrition and referred to R32's care plan for interventions. R32 also triggered for communication, activities of daily living (ADLs), cognitive loss/dementia, and pressure ulcers. R32's care plan dated 9/22/22, indicated R32 was on a mechanically altered diet with honey thickened liquids. The care plan also indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-01 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to monitor for complications related to dialysis and a dialysis access port for bleeding and/or infection for 1 of 1 residents (R43) reviewed for dialysis care. Findings include: R18's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified intact cognition, was on dialysis and had diagnoses including, heart failure, kidney failure and diabetes. R18's care plan dated 10/3/22, included they were at risk for eight changes due to dialysis treatment and was on a therapeutic diet due to heart failure, kidney disease and diabetes and staff were to communicate with the dialysis interdisciplinary team. However, the care plan did not identify when they went to dialysis or any monitoring related to dialysis treatment or how to assess, monitor or care for R18's dialysis access port. During an interview on 11/28/22, at 6:52 p.m. R18 stated she had an access port on her upper chest for dialysis and that staff did not assess it or provide any care for it.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-01 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to arrange assessment and treatment for dental care for 2 of 4 residents (R52 and R3) reviewed for dental care. Findings include: R52's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R52 was cognitively intact. R52's significant change MDS dated [DATE], indicated R52 had obvious or likely cavities or broken teeth. R52's admission Data Collection assessment dated [DATE], lacked assessment of R52's ability to chew. The assessment indicated R52 reported she had fillings coming out as well as broken teeth. R52's care plan dated 6/6/22, directed staff to provide dental visits as needed. R52's progress note dated 5/18/22, indicated R52 complained of mouth pain and showed interest in dental services. R52' facility Oral/Dental Evaluation dated 6/28/22, indicated fillings had fallen out and a tooth had crumbled over the previous few months, and R52 wanted to see a dentist. R52's Appletree Dental progress note dated 9/13/22, indicated only a brief exam…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2025-07-09 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to post accurate data reflecting the total number and actual hours worked per shift by nursing staff directly responsible for resident care on a daily basis. This had the potential to affect all 71 residents residing in the facility and their visitors who may wish to review the information. Findings include:On 7/9/25 at 8:50 a.m., the facility's nurse staff posting form dated 7/9/25, was located on top of a chest of drawers by the front desk. The posting included the daily resident census, total number of nursing staff hours, and sections for the facility's three units and section labelled agency. Each section was further broken down into sections of day shift, evening shift, overnight shift, and adjustments with spaces in each for registered nurse (RN), licensed practical nurse (LPN), trained medication aide (TMA), certified nursing assistant (NA), and nursing assistant in training (NAIT). Information written on the paper indicated the number of staff working in each role on each shift on each unit with corresponding number of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2025-05-01 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    During observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident records that contained private, medical, and personal information were not accessible to unauthorized personnel. This had the potential to affect 20 residents on the first floor of facility, and all 13 residents on the second floor whose personal information was listed on exposed care sheets. Findings include: During observation and interview starting on 4/29/25 at 12:54 p.m., licensed practical nurse (LPN)-A was observed to leave medication cart and enter a resident room. A patient care sheet was left on top of the medication cart showing private patient information for 8 residents. At 12:58 p.m., three staff members walked past the cart. Upon returning to medication cart at 1:01 p.m., LPN-A stated the unattended care sheet belonged to another clinician and he should have moved it demonstrating turning the form over and placed it under the work laptop. LPN-A stated the uncovered unattended care sheet had private patient information and it was important to secure that information to only those who require it.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2022-12-01 · tag F0886 — failed to test for COVID-19 as required — widespread
    Perform COVID19 testing on residents and staff.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review the facility failed to track and monitor staff COVID-19 test occurrances and results during a COVID-19 outbreak according to the Center for Medicare & Medicaid (CMS) and the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 71 residents, all staff, and all visitors to the facility. Findings include: CMS Memo QSO-20-38-NH dated 9/23/22, indicated, Swift identification of confirmed COVID-19 cases allows the facility to take immediate action to remove exposure risks to nursing home residents and staff. Facilities must test any individual with symptoms consistent with COVID-19 or with known or suspected exposure to COVID-19. Testing for COVID-19 must be consistent with current standards of practice. Each instance of testing must be documented that the testing was completed and include the results of each staff test. The facility is required to obtain documentation that the COVID-19 tests were completed during the timeframe corresponding to the testing frequency below: -Symptomatic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MONARCH HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT — 45 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.2-1.2 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.1-1.1 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.7-0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.0≈ chain avg
The other 44 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Hillcrest Health Care, LLCMankato, MN 1 of 5Maplewood Rehabilitation CenterMaplewood, MN 1 of 5The Emeralds At Grand Rapids LLCGrand Rapids, MN 1 of 5The Emeralds At St Paul LLCSaint Paul, MN 1 of 5The Estates At Excelsior LLCExcelsior, MN 1 of 5The Estates At Lynnhurst LLCSaint Paul, MN 1 of 5The Villas At BrookviewGolden Valley, MN 1 of 5The Villas At New BrightonNew Brighton, MN 1 of 5The Villas At Osseo LLCOsseo, MN 1 of 5The Villas At RobbinsdaleRobbinsdale, MN 1 of 5The Villas At The CedarsSaint Louis Park, MN 1 of 5The Waterview Pines LLCVirginia, MN 1 of 5The Waterview Shores LLCTwo Harbors, MN 1 of 5The Waterview Woods LLCEveleth, MN 1 of 5Villas At Bryn Mawr LLCMinneapolis, MN 2 of 5Bayside Manor LLCGaylord, MN 2 of 5Oaklawn Health Care, LLCMankato, MN 2 of 5Parmly On The Lake LLCChisago City, MN 2 of 5The Estates At Chateau LLCMinneapolis, MN 2 of 5The Estates At Fridley LLCFridley, MN 2 of 5The Estates At Roseville LLCRoseville, MN 2 of 5The Estates At Rush City LLCRush City, MN 2 of 5The Estates At Twin Rivers LLCAnoka, MN 2 of 5The Gardens At Foley LLCFoley, MN 2 of 5The Gardens At Winsted LLCWinsted, MN 2 of 5The North Shore Estates LLCDuluth, MN 2 of 5The Villas At St Louis ParkSaint Louis Park, MN 2 of 5The Villas At St PaulSaint Paul, MN 2 of 5The Villas At The ParkSaint Louis Park, MN 3 of 5Bethany On The Lake LLCAlexandria, MN 3 of 5Laurels Peak Health Care, LLCMankato, MN 3 of 5Meeker Manor Rehablitation Center, LLCLitchfield, MN 3 of 5River Valley Health And Rehabilitation Center LLCRedwood Falls, MN 3 of 5The Estates At Bloomington LLCBloomington, MN 3 of 5The Estates At St Louis Park LLCSaint Louis Park, MN 3 of 5The Villas At RichfieldRichfield, MN 3 of 5The Villas At RosevilleRoseville, MN 4 of 5Lakeshore Rehabilitation Center LLCWaseca, MN 4 of 5Mala Strana Health Care, LLCNew Prague, MN 4 of 5Sleepy Eye Rehabilitati CenterSleepy Eye, MN

Showing 40 of 44; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
JCA HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST10%since 02/01/2019
NIJ LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST10%since 02/01/2019
SPARTAN HEALTHCARE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST30%since 02/01/2019
WBS HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST20%since 02/01/2019
YAZOMA HOLDINGS, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST30%since 02/01/2019
HALPERT, MARCIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER30%since 02/01/2019
JAFFA, NOAMIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR10%since 02/01/2019
LEGUM, JOSHUAIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE30%since 02/01/2019
STERN, WILLIAMIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER20%since 02/01/2019
MONARCH HEALTHCARE OPERATING VIII LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/01/2019

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-4.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.4M
Related-party expense13% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 9%Medicare 10%Other / private 81%

This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$392per resident / day
operating cost
$11,926per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$375per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MN

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Minnesota Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Minnesota
$10,646/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,870/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,573/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 245067. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-01, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next