No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

The Villas At St Paul

445 Galtier Avenue, Saint Paul, MN 55103 · For profit - Corporation · 105 certified beds · (651) 224-1848 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (651) 224-1848 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Mar 20251 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2025
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (34) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
301 University Ave W · (651) 447-7113 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
559 Capitol Blvd · (651) 232-2200 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
291 University Ave W · (651) 209-8388 · Call to confirm hours
Park
387 Marion St · (651) 266-8989 · Typically dawn to dusk

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased14.0%18.2%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.5%4.1%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.1%1.9%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.2%2.6%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms3.9%4.1%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.3%4.0%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened13.6%20.5%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication7.1%12.5%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine86.8%96.1%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.3%5.2%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control20.0%24.5%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table10.2%17.1%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.6%1.9%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine51.0%82.7%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission19.0%23.5%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.8%14.8%12.0%typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

29.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 43 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

29.3%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
58.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.19U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.09hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 58.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 24 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 19% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF29.3%CMS range 19.0–43.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.4%CMS range 5.5–15.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge58.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge33.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge50.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified85.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened8.6%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.951.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.91
RN hours/ resident / day
0.75
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.54
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.21
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.73
RN hoursweekends
48.1%
Total nursing turnover
43.8%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 105 beds and averages 88.5 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.21 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.91 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.54 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.88 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.34 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.99 to 0.73 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-06-26)
3
at the previous standard inspection (2025-04-03)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-06-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent elopement for 1 of 1 residents (R37) who was reviewed for elopement. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) for R37 when she left the facility and was found approximately 4.5 miles away at her previous home by neighbors, which placed R37 at likelihood for serious harm or death. The IJ began on 8/30/25, when R37 exited the building without staff awareness. An unknown culinary staff had witnessed R37 outside and informed registered nurse (RN)-A who searched and was unable to find R37. The facility was contacted by family member (FM)-A who informed them R37 was found approximately 4.5 miles away without her walker, by R37's previous neighbors after missing for approximately 2.5 hours. It was unknown how R37 had gotten to her previous home and travel was through a busy metropolitan area with double laned roads and light rail systems. The administrator and director of nursing (DON) were notified of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure an elopement was reported to the state agency (SA), within 24 hours for 1 of 1 resident (R37) reviewed for elopement. Findings include: R37's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated severely impaired cognition and diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease with other signs and symptoms involving cognitive functions and awareness, and surgical repair for hip fracture. It further indicated R37 was ambulatory, used a walker, and was independent with mobility. R27's progress note dated 8/30/25 at indicated culinary staff (unknown) reported to RN-A that around 5:35 p.m. they saw R37 outside the building. RN-A went outside but was unable to locate her so they returned to the facility and notified the police, administrator, and director of nursing (DON). Then RN-A called the hospital, while another nurse drove around the immediate area to see if they could find her. Once the police arrived (at approximately 7:10 p.m.), RN-A gave them a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-26 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) was coded accurately for 2 of 3 residents (R7, R56) reviewed for MDS accuracy. Findings include: R7's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], identified in section K that while a resident a tube feeding was recorded. Diagnoses included diabetes mellitus, and no active diagnoses for nutrition.R7's physician orders dated 3/1/26 through 6/24/26, lacked identification for tube feeding. R7's nutritional assessments dated 3/37/26 and 6/23/26, lacked identification for tube feeding. R7's alteration in nutrition care plan 5/28/25, lacked identification for tube feeding. During an observation on 6/22/26 at 12:01 p.m., R7 had her eyes closed while lying in bed and no tube feeding was observed. During an interview on 6/23/26 at 1:11 p.m., the MDS coordinator reviewed R7's MDS section K and stated the indication for tube feeding must have been a mistake and should have been coded for IV (intravenous) fluids received while in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to develop a care plan which included resident goals and desired outcomes, care and services provided to attain the highest practicable level of wellbeing, and action taken by the facility to educate the resident regarding alternatives and consequences for 1 of 1 resident (R56) who refused medications.Findings include: R56's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified moderately impaired cognition, was independent with bed mobility and wheelchair mobility and, required supervision or touching assistance for lower body dressing. Diagnoses included non-Alzheimer's dementia, hypertension, and adult failure to thrive. R56 took high-risk medications including a diuretic (reduces amount of fluid from the body) and had no rejection of care.R56's self-care deficit care plan dated 4/3/24, identified he refused to wear his ted hose (compression stockings) and he was able to put them on himself and chooses to do so. The care plan did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to revise a care plan to reflect accurate status when care needs changed for 1 of 19 residents (R12) in the sample. Findings include:R12's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R12 had intact cognition, required substantial/maximal assistance with bed mobility, dependent on staff for toileting, and was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. R12's diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, diverticulitis of large intestine (a painful digestive condition causing bulging pouches in the wall of the large intestine which become inflamed and infected), enterocolitis due to clostridium difficile (C-diff-a highly contagious bacterial infection in the large intestine causing severe watery diarrhea and colon inflammation), and pressure ulcer of sacral region. R12's care plan printed 6/23/26, indicated, Resident has a current infection r/t [related to] C-Diff (infection) , was on Vancomycin (antibiotic medication), and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure pressure ulcer interventions were in place for 1 of 1 residents (R12) reviewed for pressure ulcers (PU).Findings include:R12's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R12 had intact cognition, required substantial/maximal assistance with bed mobility, dependent on staff for toileting, and was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. R12's diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, and pressure ulcer of sacral region.R12's care plan printed 6/23/26, indicated, R12 had an alteration in skin integrity related to current wounds. R12 had a stage 4 PU on the coccyx (tailbone) stage 4 and unstageable Pressure ulcer on the right outer ankle. R12's care plan interventions for skin integrity included, Pressure air mattress to bed.Low air loss air bed, pressure redistribution. R12's care plan lacked evidence of Prevlon boot 24/7 (heel protector designed to offload heel to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-26 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 resident (R3) received appropriate nutrition assessment and support who was at risk for weight loss and dehydration, and was reviewed for dialysis. Findings include:R3's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R3 had intact cognition, was independent with eating, received dialysis, and required a therapeutic diet. R3's diagnoses included diabetes mellitus and end stage renal disease. R3's care plan printed 6/24/26, indicated R3 had diabetes, was at risk for hypo and hyper glycemia, and instructed staff to monitor compliance with diet and document any problems. R3's care plan further indicated R3 was at risk for dehydration and instructed staff to, Encourage adequate fluid intake. In addition, the care plan indicated R3 had potential nutritional problem related to protein calorie malnutrition and other diagnoses and instructed staff to, Provide supplements as ordered. R3's Clinical Nutrition Evaluation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-26 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to provide appropriate monitoring of dialysis access site for 1 of 1 resident (R3) reviewed for dialysis care. Findings include:R3's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R3 had intact cognition and received dialysis. R3's diagnoses included diabetes mellitus and end stage renal disease. R3's Clinical Resident Profile printed 6/24/26, indicated, Special Instructions: Dialysis.Enhanced Barrier precaution (EBP) due to dialysis port upper right chest wall. R3's care plan reviewed 6/23/26, indicated R3 was at risk for complications related to dialysis and instructed staff to monitor central dialysis catheter port site for signs of bleeding every shift. R3's provider orders dated 1/15/26, indicated the following: -Dialysis-Review post dialysis treatment report for updates-Monitor dialysis site for bleeding-Dialysis-vital signs after dialysis R3's provider orders lacked evidence of monitoring for bruit and thrill assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure medical records contained accurate documentation for 2 of 2 residents (R3, R12) reviewed for medical record accuracy. Findings include:R3R3's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R3 had intact cognition, was independent with eating, received dialysis, and required a therapeutic diet. R3's diagnoses included diabetes mellitus and end stage renal disease. R3's care plan printed 6/24/26, indicated R3 had diabetes, was at risk for hypo and hyper glycemia, and instructed staff to monitor compliance with diet and document any problems. R3's care plan further indicated R3 was at risk for dehydration and instructed staff to, Encourage adequate fluid intake. In addition, the care plan indicated R3 had potential nutritional problem related to protein calorie malnutrition and other diagnoses and instructed staff to, Provide supplements as ordered.R3's Clinical Nutrition Evaluation dated 4/16/26, indicated R3 had a Loss…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-26 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 5 residents (R12, R27) were offered and/or provided updated vaccination for pneumococcal disease, in accordance with Centers for Disease Control (CDC). Findings include:Review of current, 2/25/26, CDC Pneumococcal Vaccine Recommendations, located at https://www.cdc.gov/pneumococcal/hcp/vaccine-recommendations/index.html, adults [AGE] years of age and older who received the PCV13 at any age and the PPSV23 at 65 years or older recommended based on shared clinical decision making, to get PCV20 or PCV21, or to not get additional pneumococcal vaccines. The site further indicated adults [AGE] years of age and older who received PCV13 at any age and PPSV23 while under the age of 65, a single dose of PCV21 or PCV20 should be given at least 5 years after the last pneumococcal vaccine dose. R12's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R12 was over the age of 65 and was not up to date on pneumococcal vaccination and was not offered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-01 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to identify the indication for the administration of narcotic medications and failed to ensure non-pharmacological interventions were attempted/offered and documented prior to the administration of as needed (PRN) narcotic medications for 1 of 3 residents (R3) reviewed for pain.Findings include:R3's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated intact cognition.R3's diagnoses list dated 3/31/26 included retroperitoneal abscess (collection of pus behind the abdominal cavity lining), acidosis (excess acid buildup in body fluids), malnutrition, acute kidney failure, and sepsis.R3's care plan dated 3/19/26 included a focus of alteration in comfort related to pain with interventions including but not limited to provide non-medical forms of pain relief such as positioning, rest, massage etcetera.R3's provider order dated 3/18/26 instructed Oxycodone (a narcotic pain relieving medication) Give 5 milligrams (mg) by mouth every six hours as needed for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 23 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to obtain and administrator routine medications according to the physician orders for 1 of 3 (R1) residents reviewed for medication administration.Findings include:R1's diagnoses list dated 2/13/26 included thoracic aortic aneurysm (a dangerous, often silent, weakening and ballooning of the aorta in the chest), neurogenic bowel (loss of normal bowel function due to nerve damage, causing constipation, incontinence, and abdominal pain and bloating), and neuropathic bladder (nerve damage interrupts signals between the brain, spinal cord, and bladder, causing urinary incontinence or retention).R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated intact cognition.R1's provider order dated 2/13/26 instructed Cranberry oral capsule, give 250 milligrams (mg) by mouth one time a day for urinary tract infection prophylaxis (prevent or reduce the risk).R1's medication administration record (MAR) for February 2026 indicated R1 did not receive cranberry on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-01 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident was free from a significant medication error for 1 of 3 residents (R3) reviewed for medication errors. Findings include:R3's diagnoses list dated 3/31/26 included retroperitoneal abscess, acidosis, malnutrition, acute kidney failure, and sepsis.R3's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated R3 did not have cognitive impairment R3's hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] included a diagnosis of hypomagnesemia. R3's magnesium laboratory (lab) result on 3/18/26 was low at 1.3. with instructions to monitor and treat accordingly. Magnesium replacement was ordered. The following order was included in the Start taking these medications list: Magnesium, take 250 milligrams(mg) by mouth daily for hypomagnesemia.R3's provider order dated 3/19/26 instructed Magnesium, take 250 milligrams(mg) by mouth one time a day for hypomagnesemia with a start date of 3/19/26.R3's medication administration record (MAR) for March 2026…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure expired food items were removed from service, food items were labeled and dated, and food was stored in a manner to prevent cross contamination. Furthermore, the facility failed to ensure dishwasher temperatures were monitored to ensure proper sanitization. This had the potential to impact all residents who reside in the facility. Findings include: Food storage An observation on 3/31/25 at 11:43 a.m., the main kitchen was reviewed. A stand-up freezer contained a silver pan with plastic wrap covering it. The plastic wrap was not secured and was loose and lifted off three sides. The plastic wrap had 2/13 beef roast written on it in black marker. Inside was frozen meat with ice crystals and patches of white frost on it. A stand-up refrigerator was reviewed. Inside contained the following: -a covered, plastic container of cut pineapple with no date. -an opened pack of turkey lunch meat with no date. -two containers of [NAME] cultured…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY R3 R3's prospective payment system (PPS) 5-day assessment Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated intact cognition and reported an open lesion on her foot and indicated she was taking an antibiotic during the lookback period. According to the Center for Disease Control (CDC), enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) are an infection control intervention aimed at reducing the transmission of multidrug resistant organisms (MDRO) used during high contact resident care activities. The CDC states contact precautions are put into place to prevent the spread of infectious agents that are spread by direct or indirect contact with the resident or the resident's environment. The CDC recommends using personal protective equipment (PPE), including gown and gloves, for all interactions that may involve contact with the resident or the resident's environment. The CDC indicates donning PPE when entering the room and discarding before exiting the room is done to contain pathogens, or contagious/infectious organisms. R3's care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure residents compression stockings were applied correctly for 1 of 1 resident (R20) reviewed for edema. R20's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated moderately impaired cognition and diagnoses of spondylosis with myelopathy (cervical region), muscle weakness, and dementia. It further indicated R20 was independent with activities of daily living (ADL) and mobility. R20's physician's order dated 3/31/25, indicated Thrombo-Emobolic Deterrent stockings (TED) on during the day and off at night, every morning and at bedtime. Remove at hour of sleep (HS) and wash and rinse, hang to dry. R20's nursing assistant care sheet (undated), indicated R20 preferred to put TED stocking on himself, staff to check that they are on during the day and off at night. R20's care plan dated 3/25/25, indicated self-care deficit related to increased weakness and failure to thrive with the following interventions: -Independent with dressing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Upon observation, interview, and record review the facility failed provide the necessary services of oral hygiene for 5 of 6 residents (R1, R2, R3, R4, R5) reviewed for activity of daily living. Findings include: R1's admission Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] indicated R1's Brief Inventory of Mental Status (BIM)s score was 00 indicating R1 was severely mentally impaired. R1 required moderate assistance with oral hygiene and eating. He required maximum assistance with dressing and transferring. R1's pertinent diagnose were alcoholic cirrhosis of the liver (severe liver disease caused by excessive alcohol), adult failure to thrive, and cachexia (weight loss of more than 10% in a person not trying to lose weight. R1's care plan dated 3/13/25 indicated R1 was to receive minimum assistant of 1-2 with personal hygiene. Upon observation and interview on 3/27/25 at 2:18 p.m. R1 was lying in bed wearing a hospital gown, two friends were visiting. A plastic basis was observed in his room with an unopened toothbrush…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-28 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Upon observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide drinks, including water consistent with the resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration for 5 of 6 residents (R1, R2, R3, R5, and R6) reviewed for hydration. Findings include: R1's Clinical Nutritional assessment dated [DATE] indicated R1's goal was for R1 to remain as nourished and hydrated as possible within the disease process. R1's admission Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] indicated R1's Brief Inventory of Mental Status (BIM)s score was 00 indicating R1 was severely mentally impaired. R1 required moderate assistance with oral hygiene and eating. He required maximum assistance with dressing and transferring. R1's pertinent diagnose were alcoholic cirrhosis of the liver (severe liver disease caused by excessive alcohol), adult failure to thrive, and cachexia (weight loss of more than 10% in a person not trying to lose weight. R1's care plan dated 3/13/25 indicated staff was to offer fluids and snacks…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to follow infection control guidelines to ensure beard nets were worn by staff who prepared food in the kitchen. This practice had the potential to affect all the residents, staff, and visitors who ate food prepared in the kitchen. Findings include: During an observation on 3/4/25 at 12:41 p.m., cook (CK)-A was observed working in the kitchen where food was being prepared by other staff. CK-A had a full beard, was not wearing a beard net and walked by where the food was being prepared. CK-A stated he worked preparing food on 3/4/25 and 3/5/25, without a beard net because the facility was out of them. CK-A stated he knew he was supposed to wear a beard net to prevent hair from getting into the food. During an interview on 3/4/25 at 12:49 p.m., dietary aide (DA)-A stated the kitchen manager was not in the facility as she left to buy beard covers. During an interview on 3/4/25 at 5:08 p.m., the administrator stated she expected staff to wear a beard cover while preparing food, and if the facility did not have a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure neglect did not occur when a staff member nursing assistant (NA)-A failed to answer call lights for a resident timely and instructed the resident to not use their call light unless it was an emergency for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for neglect. Findings include: R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) comprehensive assessment was not completed as R1 was in the facility just over 24 hours. R1's 48-hour care plan was not completed as he had been in the facility just over 24 hours. R1's progress notes dated 2/26/25 at 11:05 p.m., indicated R1 was admitted on [DATE] around 6:30 p.m., and was alert and oriented. R1's progress notes dated 2/27/25 at 9:30 a.m., indicated staff offered R1 psychiatric services due to R1 had fears related to health and his recent amputation. R1's progress note dated 2/27/25 at 5:31 p.m., indicated R1 called 911 to go to the hospital and left the facility at 6:40 p.m. on 2/27/25. During an interview on 3/4/25 at 2:20…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive, person-centered care plan was developed and adjusted as needed to promote continuity of care for 3 of 3 residents (R1, R2, and R3) reviewed for care planning. Findings include: R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified R1 admitted on [DATE] and was cognitively intact. The MDS outlined R1 required substantial physical assistance for toileting and setup/clean up assistance for oral hygiene. The MDS indicated R1 experienced occasional bladder incontinence and frequent bowel incontinence and was free of natural teeth. Further, the MDS outlined multiple Care Area Assessments (CAAs: items to have an in-depth review completed) were triggered for R1 which included, but was not limited to, Urinary Incontinence and Dental Care. Urinary incontinence was identified to be addressed in the care plan for improvement and to minimize risks. Dental care was identified to be addressed in the care plan to maintain current…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to comprehensively reassess pressure ulcer risk and adjust the care plan for 1 of 1 residents (R3) who developed an avoidable stage ll (i.e., partial thickness tissue loss) pressure ulcer to R3's coccyx (tailbone area). Findings include: R3's admission MDS and Optional State Assessment (OSA) Item Set, both dated 7/18/24, identified R3 admitted on [DATE] from an acute care hospital and was severely cognitively impaired with unclear speech and impairments with understanding and verbalization of need. The MDS outlined R3 required physical assist with cares and mobility, demonstrated total bowel and bladder incontinence, was diagnosed with diabetes, aphasia (impaired communication ability), cerebrovascular accident (CVA - stroke), dementia, diabetes, hemiplegia/paresis (weakness on one side of body), and seizure disorder, and was at risk for pressure ulcers based on clinical assessment and a formal assessment instrument/tool in which R3 utilized a pressure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-23 · tag F0729 — isolated
    Verify that a nurse aide has been trained; and if they haven't worked as a nurse aide for 2 years, receive retraining.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to verify nurse aide registration for 1 of 1 agency nursing assistants (NA-A) prior to allowing the individual to serve as a nurse aide and work directly with facility residents. This had the potential to affect all residents on the transitional care unit (TCU). Findings include: During an interview on 9/20/24 at 1:17 p.m., NA-A stated this was his first time working at the facility. NA-A identified he provided cares that morning to residents that included tasks such as hygiene and dressing cares, feeding, and mechanical lift transfers. When interviewed on 9/20/24 at 2:10 p.m., staffing coordinator (SC) stated 9/20/24 was NA-A's first shift and his agency staffing request was last minute. SC identified the director of human resources (DHR) managed facility staff and agency paperwork. During an interview on 9/20/24 at 2:25 p.m., DHR stated she only managed facility staff paperwork and did not follow-up on paperwork related to agency staff. She explained agency paperwork was SC's responsibility as SC collaborated with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-23 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a medicated powder for a fungal skin infection was transcribed when ordered, and thus applied, in accordance with provider orders for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for skin breakdown. Findings include: A wound care provider progress note, dated 8/28/24, identified R1 was assessed by nurse practitioner (NP)-A for left gluteus (buttocks) moisture associated skin damage (MASD) with observed peri area and groin intertrigo rash (skin condition caused by friction, heat, and moisture between skin folds). NP-A cleansed and applied Nystatin (anti-fungal medication) to R1's backside. The note directed the continued application of Clortrimazole-Betamethasone cream (anti-fungal medication) as previously ordered; however, did not reflect directions for facility Nystatin use. A Skin and Wound Evaluation form, dated 8/28/24, completed by NP-A, identified R1 was assessed for left gluteus incontinence associated dermatitis (condition that causes swelling and irritation of the skin). The form lacked measurements and the area…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to immediately report allegations of physical abuse to the State Agency (SA) with two hours for 1 of 1 resident. R3 reported allegations of physical abuse on her roommate R2. R3 reported during an interview that while staff was providing morning cares to R2 they put a pillow over R2's mouth to stop her screaming. R3 had reported the same allegations of physical abuse to licensed practical nurse (LPN)-A and nursing assistant (NA)-A. Neither LPN-A nor NA-A reported the allegations to the management staff at the facility. Findings include: R2's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated R2 spoke Hmong. R2's Brief Inventory of Mental Status (BIMs) score was a zero indicating R2 was unable to complete the assessment. R2 was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs) such as transfers, bed mobility, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene. R2's diagnoses included hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), diabetes and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-27 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide bathing preferences for 1 of 3 residents (R74) reviewed for choices. Findings include: R74's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R74 was in room [ROOM NUMBER]-1 and had intact cognition, did not have delirium, disorganized thinking, altered level of consciousness, hallucinations, delusions, physical, verbal, or other behavioral symptoms, and did not reject care. Additionally, the MDS indicated R74 was dependent on staff for showering and bathing. Further, the MDS indicated an interview for preferences including for receiving a tub, shower, or bed bath should be conducted, however was not assessed. R74's Medical Diagnosis form dated 6/27/24 at 9:53 a.m., indicated the following diagnoses: sepsis, rhabdomyolysis (a muscle injury where muscles break down), encephalopathy (a disturbance of brain function), blindness, and personality disorder. R74's care sheet lacked information when R74 would receive a bath or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-27 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure privacy was maintained when personal cares was provided for 2 of 2 residents (R42, R64) reviewed for activity of daily living. Findings Include: R42 R42's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R42 was cognitively impaired, dependent on staff for toileting, transfers, dressing and personal hygiene. R42's face sheet printed 6/27/24, indicated diagnosis included cerebrovascular disease affecting right dominant side, with hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness or the inability to move on one side of the body, making it hard to perform everyday activities like eating or dressing). R42's care plan revised on 5/3/23, indicated R42 was to be turned every two to three hours, and staff were to perform peri care after each incontinent episode and as needed. R64 R64's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], indicated R64 was cognitively intact, always incontinent of bowel and bladder and dependent on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to provide a clean and sanitary environment for 1 of 1 resident (R29) reviewed who had enteral feeding liquid spilled on the support legs of the tube feeding (TF) pump pole. Findings include: R29's quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], included R29 was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living, had diagnoses of traumatic brain injury, hemiparesis (weakness or the inability to move on one side of the body), and aphasia (the loss of ability to understand or express speech), and also indicated they had a feeding tube through which they received more than 50% of their nutrition. R29's physician order with revision date 6/25/24, indicated to wipe down and sanitize TF pump and pole once a week, every Thursday night shift. During observation on 6/24/24 at 12:19 p.m., R29 was lying in bed in their room with tube feeding running. The tube feeding pump was attached to a pole and there was dried brown substance on 3 of 4 support legs…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-27 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and document review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive assessment was developed, completed, and implemented for one of one resident (R74) reviewed for assessments. Findings include: See also F561. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual version 1.18.11, dated October 2023, indicated the purpose of the manual was to offer clear guidance about how to use the resident assessment instrument (RAI) correctly and effectively to provide appropriate care. The RAI helps nursing home staff gather definitive information on a resident's strengths and needs, which must be addressed in an individualized care plan. Under the heading, Section F: Preferences for Customary Routine and Activities, indicated the intent was to obtain information regarding the resident's preferences for their daily routine and activities. Further, this is best accomplished when the information is obtained directly from the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure the wound care provider's treatment orders were transcribed into the medical record to ensure continuity of care for 1 of 2 (R48) residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings include: R48's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified severely impaired cognition and no rejection of care or behaviors. Diagnoses included stroke, renal insufficiency, diabetes, aphasia (inability to speak), and malnutrition. Total assistance of two staff was required for bed mobility and transfers; and two stage three pressure ulcers, one unstageable pressure ulcer and diabetic foot ulcer were present. R48's significant change Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 3/22/24, triggered and identified R48 was at risk for developing a pressure injury and other non-pressure related skin concerns. Nursing was directed to continue to monitor for changes in condition, update provider on concerns, complete a weekly skin check and proceed to care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-27 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure restorative nursing program (RNP) was completed for 1 of 1 resident (R47) reviewed for mobility. Findings include: R47's face sheet printed 6/27/23 listed the pertinent diagnoses of peripheral vascular disease, muscle weakness, difficulty in walking, acquired absence of right leg above knee, and chronic pain syndrome. R47's quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], indicated R47 was cognitively intact, no rejection of care noted, lower extremity impairment on one side, wheelchair use, and no restorative nursing program. R47's Physical Therapy Discharge summary dated [DATE], indicated R47 to have a RNP regarding ambulation after discharge from physical therapy to maintain and increase ease with ambulation. R47's care plan dated 5/23/24 indicated the resident has, an ADL Self Care Performance Deficit r/t Amputation, Impaired balance, Limited Mobility, Pain. Resident has a right leg prosthesis. The plan directed staff to ambulate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 2 residents (R19) with repeated falls had implemented interventions to promote safety and reduce the risk of falls. Findings include: R19's Optional State Assessment (OSA) dated 5/30/24, indicated severe cognitive impairment, did not have behaviors, did not reject care, and required extensive assist for bed mobility, transfers, and toileting. R19's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R19 was frequently incontinent of bowel, had an indwelling catheter, and was not on a toileting program, did not fall in the last month prior to admission, did not fall in the last 2 to 6 months prior to admission, and had not fallen since admission. R19's care area assessment (CAA) summary dated 5/30/24, indicated falls was not triggered. R19's Medical Diagnosis form indicated the following diagnoses: peritoneal abscess, traumatic subdural hemorrhage without loss of consciousness, seizures, anemia, chronic kidney disease,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure respiratory status was monitored and assessed on an ongoing basis, and that respiratory medications were provided as indicated for 1 of 1 resident (R50) reviewed with newly prescribed oxygen use. Findings include: R50's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified severely impaired cognition, no rejection of care; diagnoses of psychosis, irregular heart rate, high blood pressure, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD/chronic inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lung). No supplemental oxygen use was identified. R50 required extensive assist with bed mobility and was independent with eating but required set up. R50's activities of daily living (ADL) care area assessment (CAA) dated 5/8/24, was triggered because the resident required assist with cares and had impaired cognition. Nursing was directed to monitor for changes in condition, update provider as necessary on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure staff utilized enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for 1 of 2 residents (R48) observed during tube feeding cares. Findings include: R48's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified she was rarely/never understood, was totally dependent on staff for bed mobility and transfers, and extensive assist was required for eating. Diagnoses included stroke, aphasia (loss of speech) and diabetes. R48 had malnutrition and received tube feeding for nutrition. R48's tube feeding care area assessment (CAA) dated 3/22/24, triggered related to receiving tube feeding for all nutritional needs. Staff were directed to continue to administer tube feeding as ordered, monitor for complications and proceed to care plan. R48's care plan dated 3/29/24, identified EBP was placed related to tube feeding and chronic pressure wounds, and staff were directed to don/doff personal protective equipment (PPE) per EBP when high contact cares were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MONARCH HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT — 45 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.2-0.2 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.1-0.1 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 53.7+0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.0≈ chain avg
The other 44 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Hillcrest Health Care, LLCMankato, MN 1 of 5Maplewood Rehabilitation CenterMaplewood, MN 1 of 5The Emeralds At Fairbault LLCFaribault, MN 1 of 5The Emeralds At Grand Rapids LLCGrand Rapids, MN 1 of 5The Emeralds At St Paul LLCSaint Paul, MN 1 of 5The Estates At Excelsior LLCExcelsior, MN 1 of 5The Estates At Lynnhurst LLCSaint Paul, MN 1 of 5The Villas At BrookviewGolden Valley, MN 1 of 5The Villas At New BrightonNew Brighton, MN 1 of 5The Villas At Osseo LLCOsseo, MN 1 of 5The Villas At RobbinsdaleRobbinsdale, MN 1 of 5The Villas At The CedarsSaint Louis Park, MN 1 of 5The Waterview Pines LLCVirginia, MN 1 of 5The Waterview Shores LLCTwo Harbors, MN 1 of 5The Waterview Woods LLCEveleth, MN 1 of 5Villas At Bryn Mawr LLCMinneapolis, MN 2 of 5Bayside Manor LLCGaylord, MN 2 of 5Oaklawn Health Care, LLCMankato, MN 2 of 5Parmly On The Lake LLCChisago City, MN 2 of 5The Estates At Chateau LLCMinneapolis, MN 2 of 5The Estates At Fridley LLCFridley, MN 2 of 5The Estates At Roseville LLCRoseville, MN 2 of 5The Estates At Rush City LLCRush City, MN 2 of 5The Estates At Twin Rivers LLCAnoka, MN 2 of 5The Gardens At Foley LLCFoley, MN 2 of 5The Gardens At Winsted LLCWinsted, MN 2 of 5The North Shore Estates LLCDuluth, MN 2 of 5The Villas At St Louis ParkSaint Louis Park, MN 2 of 5The Villas At The ParkSaint Louis Park, MN 3 of 5Bethany On The Lake LLCAlexandria, MN 3 of 5Laurels Peak Health Care, LLCMankato, MN 3 of 5Meeker Manor Rehablitation Center, LLCLitchfield, MN 3 of 5River Valley Health And Rehabilitation Center LLCRedwood Falls, MN 3 of 5The Estates At Bloomington LLCBloomington, MN 3 of 5The Estates At St Louis Park LLCSaint Louis Park, MN 3 of 5The Villas At RichfieldRichfield, MN 3 of 5The Villas At RosevilleRoseville, MN 4 of 5Lakeshore Rehabilitation Center LLCWaseca, MN 4 of 5Mala Strana Health Care, LLCNew Prague, MN 4 of 5Sleepy Eye Rehabilitati CenterSleepy Eye, MN

Showing 40 of 44; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
NIJ LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST16%since 01/01/2023
SPARTAN HEALTHCARE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST32%since 01/01/2023
WBS HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST26%since 01/01/2023
YAZOMA HOLDINGS, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST26%since 01/01/2023
HALPERT, MARCIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL32%since 01/01/2023
JAFFA, NOAMIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR16%since 01/01/2023
LEGUM, JOSHUAIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE26%since 01/01/2023
STERN, WILLIAMIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER26%since 01/01/2023
MONARCH HEALTHCARE OPERATING XII LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-7.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$919K
Related-party expense9% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 75%Medicare 3%Other / private 23%

About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $919K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$339per resident / day
operating cost
$10,292per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$316per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MN

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Minnesota Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Minnesota
$10,646/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,870/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,573/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 245340. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next