The Estates At Fridley LLC
5700 East River Road, Fridley, MN 55432 · Non profit - Corporation · 50 certified beds · (763) 571-3150 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Oct 2025
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (34) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 9.3% | 18.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.5% | 4.1% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 1.9% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 2.6% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 13.2% | 4.1% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.5% | 4.0% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 8.6% | 20.5% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 14.9% | 12.5% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.5% | 96.1% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 12.0% | 5.2% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 18.0% | 24.5% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 22.6% | 17.1% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 3.1% | 1.9% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 86.1% | 82.7% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 22.7% | 23.5% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 8.2% | 14.8% | 12.0% | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
43.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 37 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 54.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 24 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 44% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 43.6%CMS range 32.3–59.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.2%CMS range 5.7–16.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 54.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 45.8% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 50.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.76 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 50 beds and averages 46.4 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.25 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.94 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.94 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.90 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.39 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.09 to 0.58 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
34 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2025-10-27 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from abuse for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed when the facility did not evaluate the effectiveness of R1's interventions for mental health needs. R1 entered R2's room and physically pushed him over backwards in his wheelchair, then attempted to throw the wheelchair at R2 before staff intervened. R1 displayed an outward change in condition on 10/13/25, went to the hospital on [DATE], and R1 called the police on 10/21/25 prior to the incident with R2. R1 had exhibited drug induced psychosis from recreational methamphetamine use in days leading up to the abuse. R2 was fearful of living with R1 in the facility. Findings include: R1's care plan dated 3/24/25 indicated R1 had a history and diagnosis of substance abuse: alcohol use. R1's interventions on 3/24/25 were education on the substance abuse policy and staff was to monitor and check vitals of resident if he was found under the influence. On 10/16/25 the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-27 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to identify alternatives prior to installing or using grab bars (bars installed at the head of the bed for a resident to hold onto for bed mobility or transfers), ensure grab bars were comprehensively assessed to determine if they were appropriate and safe, discuss the risks and benefits, and obtain informed consent prior to use of grab bars for 1 of 3 residents (R1) who was observed to have grab bars on their bed.R1's diagnoses list dated 3/27/26 included spastic hemiplegia (stiff, weak muscles and involuntary movements on one side of the body) affecting left side and muscle weakness.R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated moderate cognitive impairmentDuring an observation and interview on 3/27/2026 at 12:25 p.m., R1 was observed in her room sitting in a power chair. R1's bed was observed with bilateral grab bars. R1 stated she utilized the grab bars to roll in bed and for transfers.R1's care plan dated 1/23/26…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-01-29 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to implement effective and timely pest control measures to reduce and/or eliminate a mouse infestation in the facility. This had potential to affect all 49 residents who resided in the facility. Findings include:During interview on 1/28/26 at 5:00 p.m., R2 stated she stays in her bed and can lay and sit up in her bed. R2 stated she has noticed mice in her room all of the time, and last week she noticed a mouse running in her room and then it ran out into the hallway. R2 stated her room is right crossed from where the residents go in and out to smoke on the patio area and thought that was how they were getting in the building. R2 said she had told the maintenance director about the mice in her room, and he had put some sticky mouse traps down but felt the facility could more to control them. In addition, R2 stated the facility should make sure there was not food in resident rooms that were not in containers or being left out. During interview on 1/28/26 at 7:40 p.m., R1 stated she overheard a nurse stating a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was updated to ensure elopement risk and civil commitment were identified, and appropriate interventions were developed for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed. Findings include: R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated moderate cognitive impairment and diagnoses that included Wernicke's encephalopathy (an acute neurological disorder with symptoms that include difficulty moving and confusion), alcoholic cirrhosis (liver damage) of the liver, and alcoholism not in remission. R1's Elopement Risk assessment dated [DATE], indicated a score of 4. The assessment indicated an elopement risk based on the nurse's assessment. The assessment further indicated with a risk score of 4 or greater, the facility should develop a care plan related to elopement risk. R1's progress note dated 9/19/25 at 9:03 a.m., indicated R1 was on a civil commitment. R1's care plan reviewed on 10/3/25 lacked information or staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to accurately document risk factors on an elopement assessment for 2 of 3 residents (R1, R3). Findings include: R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated moderate cognitive impairment and diagnoses that included Wernicke's encephalopathy (an acute neurological disorder with symptoms that include difficulty moving and confusion), alcoholic cirrhosis (liver damage) of the liver, and alcoholism not in remission. R1's orders dated 9/17/25, indicated quetiapine fumarate (antipsychotic medication used to treat mental health conditions) oral tablet and 25 milligrams (mg) at bedtime. R1's Elopement Risk assessment dated [DATE], indicated two risk areas: 1. Ambulatory or ability to self-propel a wheelchair and 2. Resident was asking to go home. Based on Assessment scale, that would have indicated a score of two, but was documented as a score of four. The assessment also included point for risk factors for prescribed antipsychotic medications…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-19 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and document review, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan for 1 of 4 (R2) residents reviewed for care plans. R2 had a cervical fracture and cervical collar but did not have relevant interventions in the care plan for the management of the collar. Findings include:A cervical collar is a medical device used to support and protect the neck and spinal cord.R2's face sheet dated 11/19/25 indicated R2 was admitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses of other displaced dens fracture (cervical spine fracture), subsequent encounter for fracture with routine healing, type II diabetes with diabetic nephropathy, depression, chronic pain, anxiety, need for assistance with personal care, and dorsopathy (back pain).R2's Medicare 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated R2 was cognitively intact, had no behaviors and required moderate assistance with activities of daily living. The care area assessment was signed 11/12/25.R2's hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and document review, the facility failed to properly assess and monitor skin conditions for 1 of 4 (R2) residents reviewed for medical braces and quality of care. R2 had a cervical collar (C-collar) for a cervical fracture and the facility failed to document orders, complete skin assessments, assess the site and change the brace padding.Findings includeA cervical collar is a medical device used to support and protect the neck and spinal cord.R2's face sheet dated 11/19/25 indicated R2 was admitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses of other displaced dens fracture (cervical spine fracture), subsequent encounter for fracture with routine healing, type II diabetes with diabetic nephropathy, depression, chronic pain, anxiety, need for assistance with personal care, and dorsopathy (back pain).R2's Medicare 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated R2 was cognitively intact, had no behaviors and required moderate assistance with activities of daily living.R2's hospital…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-10-27 · tag F0742 — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate treatment and/or services were provided to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for mental health needs. R1 was assessed with a history of alcohol abuse, extreme trauma, and mental health disorders with limited interventions. R1's mental health declined resulting in abuse towards staff and a resident (R2), calls to the police, and hospitalizations.Findings include: R1's nursing progress note by social services dated 3/24/24 at 3:28 p.m. indicated R1 was cognitively intact with minimal depression. R1's goal was to be strong and go home. R1 was offered the facilities inhouse psychiatry services and declined. The note did not indicate if client was offered opportunities for autonomy, arrangements to keep R1 in touch with his prior community and alcoholic anonymous group, cultural heritage, and religious practices. R1's care plan dated 3/24/25 indicated R1 had a history and diagnosis of substance abuse: alcohol use. R1's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to assess residents for the ability to self-administer medications, or obtain orders for leaving medications at bedside and/or self-administration for 1 of 1 (R21) residents reviewed for self-administration of medications.Findings include: R21's face sheet dated 8/7/25, indicated R21 was re-admitted to facility on 7/30/25 and had the following diagnoses: end stage renal failure, fluid overload, conversion disorder with seizures, hypertension, cerebral infarction, pulmonary edema and need for assistance with personal care.During observation on 8/04/25 at 6:18 p.m., an albuterol inhaler with resident's name on the label, and a bottle of Ocean nasal spray with resident's name on the label was noted on the bedside table.During observations on 08/06/2025 at 9:49 a.m., an albuterol inhaler with resident's name on the label was observed on the bedside table.During observations on 08/06/2025 at 11:22 a.m. and 1:38 p.m., a bottle of Ocean nasal spray with resident's name on the label was noted on the bedside table.Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-07 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure a written notification of transfer was sent to the office of the Ombudsman for long term care for 2 of 5 (R12, R21) upon transfer to the hospital. Findings include: R12 face sheet dated 8/7/2025, indicated R12 was admitted on [DATE] and had the following diagnoses: wound of the lower back and pelvis, major depressive disorder, paraplegia, pulmonary embolism (blood clot in lung), gunshot wound, neurogenic bladder, incontinence, septicemia (blood infection), and neurogenic bowel. R12's hospital transfer form dated 6/2/25, indicated R12 was hospitalized on [DATE]. R12's progress notes indicated R12 was hospitalized from [DATE]-[DATE]. R12's medical record lacked evidence a written notification of transfer was sent to the office of the Ombudsman for long term care. R21's face sheet dated 8/7/25, indicated R21 was re-admitted to facility on 7/30/25 and had the following diagnoses: end stage renal failure, fluid overload, conversion disorder with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to complete proper checks for 1 of 1 residents (R58) reviewed for medication administration documentation.R58's significant change MDS dated [DATE], included diagnosis of psychotic disorder and depression. R58's Moments Hospice order dated 6/7/25, included an order for lorazepam 0.5 mg by mouth every 4 hours as needed for terminal agitation (restlessness that occurs close to death). R58's Order Summary Report dated 8/6/25, included an order for lorazepam oral tablet 0.5 milligrams (mg) by mouth every 4 hours as needed for terminal agitation. Facility narcotic book included an entry for R58 for lorazepam liquid give 0.5 milliliters (mL) every 4 hours. Administrations were documented for 7/8 and 7/9. Medication record for R58 included administration for lorazepam oral tab 0.5 mg was administered on 7/8/25 and 7/9/25. During interview on 8/7/25 at 11:53 a.m., registered nurse (RN)-A stated she would review the original order if she had a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 23 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-07 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure coordination of care and communication between the facility and the dialysis center for 1 of 1 residents (R21) who received hemodialysis. Findings include:R21's admission minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R21 had diagnoses of anemia, hypertension, renal insufficiency, renal failure, or end stage renal disease (ESRD) and was receiving hemodialysis. Additionally, the MDS indicated R21's brief interview of mental status (BIMS) score was 15 indicating R21 was cognitively intact.During interview on 8/4/25, at 5:40 p.m., R21 stated he attended dialysis three days per week on Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday.R21's clinical physician orders report printed 8/7/25, indicated the following orders: hemodialysis scheduled every Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday at Davita Dialysis Center of [NAME], monitor dialysis site for bleeding, monitor fistula for bruit and thrill, complete post dialysis vital signs, complete dialysis communication form and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to properly dispose of controlled medication for 2 of 2 residents (R57, R58) reviewed for disposal of medications after discharge.R57's death in facility minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], included R57 was discharged /deceased on [DATE].R57's Order Summary Report printed [DATE], included an order for lorazepam oral concentrate 2 mg/ml (a medication give for anxiety) give 0.25 milliliters (mL) by mouth every 2 hours as needed for restlessness and anxiety AND give 0.25 mL by mouth every 4 hours for restlessness and anxiety.During tour of medication room on [DATE] at 1:50 p.m., assistant director of nursing (ADON) opened lock box used to store controlled substances requiring refrigeration. Lock box contained a box containing a bottle with a label that identified it as lorazepam 2mg/ml for R57. ADON was unable to locate tracking page for R57's lorazepam in narcotic book currently being used in the facility. ADON was able to locate the tracking…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to properly store controlled substances in 1 of 1 medication rooms reviewed for medication storage.During tour of medication room on 8/6/25 at 1:50 p.m., assistant director of nursing (ADON) showed the unlocked medication refrigerator with small unaffixed lockbox. ADON removed the lockbox from the refrigerator and unlocked it to show 6 controlled medications in the lock box. During interview on 8/6/25 at 1:50 p.m., ADON confirmed the lockbox was not permanently affixed to the refrigerator. ADON stated the facility had explored options to attach the lock box but had not yet found a solution. ADON described the box as similar to the size of an iPad and about 4 inches thick. ADON confirmed the whole box could be removed from the medication room. During interview on 8/7/25 at 8:13 a.m., director of nursing (DON) stated controlled refrigerated medications were stored in the refrigerator in the locked medication room in a lock box. The DON confirmed the lock box was not permanently affixed to the refrigerator because…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene was performed when providing wound care for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for pressure ulcer care. Findings include: R2's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R2 had moderate cognitive impairment and moisture associated skin wounds. R2's care plan dated 4/6/25 indicated enhanced barrier precautions (EBP, measures intended to prevent the spread of multi-drug-resistant organisms) related to a catheter and wounds. The care plan further directed staff should don/doff personal protective equipment (PPE) per EBP when providing high contact care. The care plan was revised on 5/29/25, and indicated R2 had a pressure ulcer on the left lateral foot, and staff would monitor for signs and symptoms of infection. R2's wound care orders dated 5/27/25, indicated apply Santyl (prescription ointment to treat wounds) to the left lateral foot wound topically every evening shift every Tuesday, Thursday, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-21 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure annual performance reviews were completed for 1 of 1 nursing assistants (NA-A) whose personnel files were reviewed. This deficient practice had potential to affect all residents who currently resided in the nursing home and who could receive care from this staff. Findings include: NA-A was hired on 10/27/23. NA-A's personnel record lacked evidence an annual performance review was ever completed. On 4/21/25 at 12:14 p.m., during an interview NA-A stated he was hired in October 2023, and had not had a performance evaluation. On 4/21/25 at 4:22 p.m., during an interview the director of nursing stated performance reviews were expected to be completed every 12 months, and acknowledged NA-A's performance review was due in October 2024, and had not been completed. A policy on performance reviews was requested; the facility did not have a policy about performance reviews.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of potential abuse for 1 of 1 resident (R1) who complained of rough care by staff, was reported immediately but no later than 2 hours to the State Agency (SA). Findings include: On 4/21/25, a review of a facility Grievance Form dated 4/6/25, indicated [NAME] police contacted the facility and spoke to the Social Services Director (SSD) and informed the SSD a Minnesota Abuse Reporting Center (MAARC) report was filed indicating a nursing assistant (NA) was rough when getting R1 into his wheelchair on 4/6/25 around 4:30 p.m., and R1's leg and abdomen were subsequently hurting. On 4/21/25, the SSD was not available for interview. On 4/21/25 at 11:51 a.m., during an interview registered nurse (RN)-A stated when she learned of any type of abuse, she was expected to report it to the director of nursing (DON) right away, and the facility had 24 hours to report it to the SA. On 4/21/25 at 12:35 p.m., during an interview NA-A stated if he…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a registered nurse (RN) was scheduled for a minimum of 8 consecutive hours a day. This had the potential to affect all 35 residents who resided at the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility daily staffing hours and staff schedules from 2/1/24-4/30/24, indicated there was no RN scheduled on the following dates: 2/10/24, 2/17/24, 2/18/24, 2/25/24, 3/2/24, 3/3/24, 3/9/24, 3/10/24, 3/16/24, 3/17/24, 3/23/24, 3/24/24, 3/30/24, 3/32/24, 4/6/24, 4/7/24, 4/13/24, 4/14/24, 4/20/24, 4/21/24, 4/27/24, and 4/28/24. During interview on 5/01/24 at 2:38 p.m., the staffing coordinator verified there was not an RN working 8 consecutive hours on the dates above and stated they do not have any RN's on staff except the assistant director of nursing (ADON), the director of nursing (DON), and the occasional agency/pool nurse. The staffing coordinator further stated the ADON and DON are not included on the schedule during the week so they can be pulled in if needed. They are not scheduled to work on the weekends but take…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-02 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to provide ordered podiatry care for 1 of 1 resident (R23) reviewed for foot care. Findings include: R23's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified intact cognition, and extensive assist required with personal hygiene and bathing. Diagnoses included of heart failure (affects blood circulation), respiratory failure, hypertension, morbid obesity, and candidiasis (fungal infection) of nail. Anticoagulant medication was taken daily. R23's care plan dated 3/29/24, identified self-care deficit related to history of repeated falls, bilateral osteoarthritis, chronic pain, weakness, morbid obesity, difficulty walking, muscle weakness, other fatigue, other abnormalities of gait. Assist of one staff was required with personal grooming and hygiene. R23's nurse practitioner order dated 7/21/23, identified consult podiatry for diagnosis of overgrown toenails. R23's medical record dated 7/21/23 through 5/2/24, lacked documentation a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure prescribed medications were available for 1 of 1 resident (R23) who was awaiting a new medication. Findings include: R23's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified intact cognition, and extensive assist required with personal hygiene and bathing. Diagnoses included heart failure (affects blood circulation), respiratory failure, hypertension, and morbid obesity. There were no ulcers, wounds, skin problems or skin treatments identified in the MDS. R23's activities of daily living (ADL) care area assessment (CAA) dated 6/8/23, identified the CAA triggered since resident needed extensive assist with most ADLs related to her respiratory condition and morbid obesity. R23's care plan dated 8/11/23, identified an alteration in skin integrity due to multiple areas of self-inflicted skin tears. The goal was to have skin breakdown resolved by next review. Skin was to be monitored daily during cares, weekly skin inspection by the nurse,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure the pharmacist recommendations were implemented timely for 1 of 5 residents (R9) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings Include: R9's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) indicated R9's diagnosis included coronary artery disease, hypertension, hyperlipidemia and was on antiplatelet medication. R9's care plan initiated 2/16/23, lacked documentation for coronary artery disease and hyperlipidemia goals or interventions. R9's physician orders dated 2/16/23, indicated rosuvastatin calcium oral tablet, give 10 mg by mouth at bedtime for hyperlipidemia. R9's pharmacy medication regimen review (MRR) were as follows: -3/6/24, pharmacy MRR indicated, note: reissued recommendation from 2/6/24, this resident continues on rosuvastatin 10 milligram every bedtime and Fenofibrate 54 mg every day treating hyperlipidemia, does not have type II diabetes. I was unable to locate a lipid panel. If not recently drawn, please clarify if a lipid panel should be drawn to evaluate the ongoing use of Fenofibrate. A provider…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-02 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure an antipsychotic medication was not started without adequate medical justification; and that a discussion of risks, benefits and potential side effects was understood by the resident, representative, or family for 1 of 1 resident (R30) reviewed who had a newly prescribed antipsychotic. In addition, the facility failed to include individualized approaches for care, including behavior tracking and non-pharmacological interventions for 2 of 4 residents (R30 and R89), and failed to ensure as needed (PRN) antipsychotic medication was not used longer than 14 days without the resident being directly evaluated by the prescriber for 1 of 2 residents (R89) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: R30's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified severe cognitive impairment. No psychosis, rejection of care, or behaviors occurred in the lookback period. Diagnoses included head injury, communication deficit, muscle weakness. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 5 residents (R9) was offered or received the pneumococcal vaccine in accordance with the Center for Disease Control (CDC) recommendations. Findings include: The CDC Pneumococcal Vaccine Timing for Adults dated 3/15/23, indicated adults aged 65 years and older who have had no prior pneumococcal vaccinations could either have option A which indicated PCV20, or option B, give PCV15 and follow with PPSV23 after at least one year of giving PCV15. If only the PPSV23 vaccination was administered prior at any age, option A indicated PCV20 could be administered after 1 year or option B indicated PCV15 could be administered after 1 year. If only the PCV13 vaccination was administered at any age, option A indicated PCV20 could be administered after 1 year, or PPSV23. If PCV13 was administered at any age, and PPSV23 was administered prior to [AGE] years of age, option A indicated PCV20 could be administered after five years, or option B indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-05-11 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a registered nurse (RN) was scheduled for a minimum of eight consecutive hours a day. This had the potential to affect all 44 residents who resided at the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility daily staffing hours and staff schedules from 4/1/23 through 4/30/23, revealed there was no RN scheduled on-site during the following weekends: - 4/1/23 through 4/2/23 - 4/8/23 through 4/9/23 - 4/15/23 through 4/16/23 - 4/22/23 through 4/23/23 - and 4/29/23 through 4/30/23. On 5/10/23 at 1:01 p.m., the administrator reviewed the daily staff posting and stated a 0 under the 'staff hours column' means there was no RN scheduled. A 1 in the 'number of staff column' indicates the DON would have covered. During interview on 5/11/23 at 9:13 a.m., the administrator stated there is always an RN in the facility Monday through Friday. The administrator stated at least one weekend a month, if not more, there is not an RN working in the building and the assistant director of nursing (ADON) or the director of nursing (DON)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-05-11 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assurance Assessment and Performance Improvement Plan (QAPI) committee effectively sustained ongoing compliance related to repeat citations from past surveys in regards infection control and self-administration of medications (SAM) which were also identified during this survey. This had the potential to effect all 44 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility CASPER Report dated 5/1/23, identified the facility was cited F880 for infection control on the surveys which exited 7/11/19 and 9/16/21. The facility was also cited F554 for SAM on the survey which exited 9/16/21. See F880: Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure staff wore appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) appropriately for 1 of 2 residents (R31) who was on transmission based precautions (TBP). See F554: Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to assess the resident and determine safety for SAM for 2 of 2 residents (R34…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to remove facial hair and maintain dignity for 1 of 3 residents (R4) reviewed for dignity. Findings include: R4's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R4 had severe cognitive impairment, and required one-person physical assistance for personal hygiene to include shaving. R4's diagnoses included schizoaffective disorder, obsessive compulsive disorder, intellectual disability, unspecified psychosis, and anxiety disorder. R4's care conference note dated 4/5/23, indicated, interdisciplinary team (IDT) met with family member (FM)-A for a quarterly conference. The note indicated, The family has requested facila [sic] shaving to occur during her showers - need care notes updated. R4's care plan dated 3/21/23, indicated R4 was at risk for impaired ability to complete activities of daily living (ADLs) due to cognitive impairments and mental health and required supervision with set up for grooming and personal hygiene. R4's nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-11 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to assess and determine safety for self-administration of medications (SAM) for 2 of 2 residents (R34 and R243) whom were observed to have medications in their rooms. Findings include: R34's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R34 was cognitively intact and required assistance of 1-2 staff with activities of daily living (ADL's) including bed mobility, dressing and personal hygiene. R34's diagnoses included altered mental status, psychotic disorder with delusions, bipolar disorder and muscle weakness. R34's Order Summary Report dated 5/11/23, included Triamcinolone Acetonide External Cream 0.5% (a medication used to treat symptoms including itching, dryness, and inflammation caused by various skin conditions) topically for urticaria (hives). The physician orders lacked SAM orders. R34's care plan dated 4/18/23, failed to identify skin conditions and interventions that included SAM. During observation on 5/09/23 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-11 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to timely follow up on a resident requested medication change for 1 of 2 residents (R17) reviewed for choices. Findings include: R17's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified she had intact cognition and had not rejected cares. R17 had a diagnosis of end stage renal disease. R17 required supervision for dressing and limited assist for hygiene. R17's medication orders included: -start date of 12/7/2022, cetirizine hcl (hydrocloride) (an antihistamine) oral tablet five mg (milligrams) by mouth every 24 hours as needed related to allergic rhinitis. R17's Communication Form dated 4/14/23, identified a request of R17 for Zyrtec (brand name for cetirizine) to be scheduled, as the medication was PRN (as needed) at this time. The provider's written response on 4/17/23, was pls [please] re-ask the question. During an observation and interview on 5/09/23 at 9:09 a.m., R17 had dry, red eyes and rubbed her nose. R17 stated I have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to revise care plan interventions with recommended behavioral approaches for 1 of 1 residents (R29) reviewed for mood and behavior. Findings include: R29's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified he had intact cognition and had rejected cares one to three days in the look back period. R29 was independent with ambulation and toileting. R29 had a diagnosis of encephalopathy (brain disease, damage, or malfunction that can cause an altered mental state.) R29's Associated Clinic of Psychology (ACP) visit note dated 4/5/23, identified it was important for staff to replace R29's linens when they removed items. Further, it was important to replace the items as soon as possible to help decrease R29's concerns of items were stolen. R29's mood and behavior care plan dated 4/10/23, lacked the recommended intervention to replace any removed linens. During an observation on 5/9/23 at 11:07 a.m., R29 was yelling loudly in the hallway for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-11 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy recommendations were addressed for 1 of 1 resident (R4) reviewed for antipsychotic medication side effects. Findings include: R4's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R4 had severe cognitive impairment, and had received antipsychotics 7 of the 7 days during the lookback period. R4's diagnoses included schizoaffective disorder, obsessive compulsive disorder, intellectual disability, unspecified psychosis, and anxiety disorder. R4's provider orders indicated Risperdal tablet 1mg (milligram). Give 1 mg by mouth every morning and at bedtime for schizoaffective disorder. R4's care plan dated 3/21/23, indicated R4 had potential for psychotropic drug ADR's (adverse drug reactions) related to daily use of psychotropic medication. R4's consultant pharmacist medication regimen review (MRR) recommendation dated 11/3/22, indicated, This resident takes Risperidone, a medication that can cause metabolic abnormalities including…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-11 · tag F0776 — isolatedProvide timely, approved x-ray services, or have an agreement with an approved provider to obtain them.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to timely arrange for an ordered urology examination 1 of 1 resident (R29) reviewed who required diagnostics services. Findings include: R29's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified intact cognition. R29 was independent with ambulation and toileting. R29's had a diagnosis of encephalopathy (brain disease, damage, or malfunction that can cause an altered mental state.) R29's orders dated 12/2/22, identified please schedule urology appointment to evaluate and treat for urinary incontinence- may need urodynamic studies. R29's physician visit notes identified the following: -12/16/22, R29 reported frequent urination and urinary incontinence. R29's room smelled of urine, but R29 did not smell of urine. R29 was asked about the urologist and R29 reported not seeing one yet. The note added a diagnosis of functional urinary incontinence and would discuss with staff a urology follow up. -1/23/23, R29 continued to report frequent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure staff wore appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) appropriately for 1 of 2 residents (R31) who was on transmission based precautions (TBP). Findings include: R31's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R31 was cognitively intact and was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. The assessment identified R31 required extensive assist from one or more staff for toileting, bed mobility, transfers, and personal hygiene. R31's diagnoses included diabetes mellitus, heart disease, peripheral vascular disease, and methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection. The assessment lacked diagnosis of urinary tract infection with vancomycin-resistant enterocolitis (VRE - an infection in the urine that is resistant to vancomycin antibiotics, is usually spread from person to person through contact with infected people or people who carry the bacteria without it causing infection within…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-11 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 5 residents (R2 and R35) were offered or received the pneumococcal vaccine in accordance with the Center for Disease Control (CDC) recommendations. Findings include: The CDC's Pneumococcal Vaccine Timing for Adults dated 3/15/23, identified adults 65 years or older who had not previously received any pneumococcal vaccine, one dose of PCV15 or PCV20 (pneumococcal conjugate vaccines) should be administered. If PCV15 was used, this should be followed by a dose of PPSV23 (pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine) at least 1 year later. R2's face sheet undated, identified he was [AGE] years old and admitted on [DATE]. R2 had no allergies to vaccines or contraindications to vaccines listed. R2's immunization record undated, lacked documentation of the pneumococcal vaccine. R2's Resident Vaccine Administration Consent form undated, identified he declined the influenza and COVID-19 vaccines but lacked documentation of the pneumococcal vaccine. R35's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-11 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to provide the COVID-19 vaccination timely to 1 of 1 resident (R37) whom requested to be vaccinated. Findings include: R37's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified intact cognition. R37 required limited assistance with dressing and hygiene. R37's diagnoses included stroke with paralysis on one side of the body and pulmonary disease. R37's face sheet undated, identified she was [AGE] years old and was admitted on [DATE]. R37 had no allergies to vaccines or contraindications to vaccines listed. R37's immunization sheet undated, identified she had one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine on 8/11/21. R37's Resident Vaccine Administration Consent Form dated 2/7/23, identified the COVID-19 vaccine would be completed by the facility. During an interview on 5/9/23 at 4:00 pm., R37 stated staff offered the COVID-19 vaccine when she was admitted but it had not been administered yet and she still wanted the vaccine. During an interview on 5/11/23…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to MONARCH HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT — 45 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 3.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.0 | ≈ chain avg |
The other 44 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.2★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 44; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NIJ LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 7% | since 03/01/2017 |
| SPARTAN HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 30% | since 03/01/2017 |
| YAZOMA HOLDINGS, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 30% | since 03/01/2017 |
| AREM, JEFFREY | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 7% | since 03/01/2017 |
| STERN, WILLIAM | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 20% | since 03/01/2017 |
| HALPERT, MARC | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | 30% | since 03/01/2017 |
| JAFFA, NOAM | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 7% | since 03/01/2017 |
| LEGUM, JOSHUA | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICER | 30% | since 03/01/2017 |
| MONARCH HEALTHCARE OPERATING IV LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/01/2017 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $835K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MN
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Minnesota Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 245201. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-07, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.