The Villas At The Park

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 31 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 29% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 52 beds and averages 48.4 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.16 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.67 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.16 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.93 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.26 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.71 to 0.59 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to ensure a resident received appropriate interventions to prevent contractures for a resident who was admitted to the care facility without contractures (permanent shortening of tissue, such as muscle, tendon or skin leading to the inability to straighten joints fully and to permanent deformity and disability) for one of two residents (R20) reviewed for range of motion. This resulted in actual harm when R20 developed severe contractures of bilateral upper and lower extremities. Findings include:R20s significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated R20 was admitted to the care facility on 3/20/19. The MDS indicated R20 was not on any range of motion or restorative nursing programs. R20's previous MDS dated [DATE] further indicated R20 had range of motion impairment on only one side of his body and also lacked any mention of a range of motion or nursing restorative program. The MDS dated [DATE] further indicated R20 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2024-10-24 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The State Operations Manual (SOM) defined the various presure ulcers as follows: A stage one pressure injury is intact skin with a localized area of redness that is non-blanchable (does not turn white when pressed). A stage two pressure ulcer is partial thickness loss of the skin with exposed dermis, presenting as a shallow open ulcer. It may also present as an intact or open/ruptured blister. Adipose (fat) is not visible and deeper tissues are not visible. Granulation tissue, slough and eschar (dead or devitalized tissue that is hard or soft in texture; usually black, brown, or tan in color, and may appear scab-like) are not present. A stage three pressure ulcer is full thickness loss of the skin in which subcutaneous fat may be visible. Additionally, slough (non-viable yellow, tan, gray, green or brown tissue; usually moist, can be soft, stringy and mucinous in texture) or eschar may be visible but does not obscure the depth of the tissue loss. A stage four pressure ulcer is full thickness loss of the skin and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-11-20 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  During observation and interview, the facility failed to implement interventions to ensure resident's personal care information was kept secured and out of public view when stored on 1 of 3 mobile medication carts. This had the potential to affect 14 residents (R3, R4, R9, R14, R27, R28, R30, R32, R35, R40, R43, R47, R48, and a discharged resident) on the long-term care unit whose personal information was left unattended on a medication cart in the hallway corridor. Findings include:During observation and interview on 11/19/25 at 9:05 a.m., an unattended medication cart had a form titled East nursing care sheet with 13 resident names, room numbers, and notations including other personal information such as nutritional needs such as tube feeding, blood sugars, blood pressures, heart rates, recent falls with confusion and wearing adaptive equipment. Electronic medical record (EMR) access username, password, and wifi information was also included. In addition, the cart had an opened narcotic logbook with two residents' information including name, room number, and narcotic dosage…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to ensure a resident (R20) was assessed and care planned for a dignified toileting experience for a continent resident who was told to wet himself for toileting.Findings include:R12's admission minimal data set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated R12 was admitted to the care facility on 10/29/25, had moderate cognitive impairment and required extensive assistance with most activities of daily living (ADLs).R12's diagnoses list, dated 10/29/25 indicated R12 as admitted to the care facility with a primary diagnosis of sequelae of cerebral infarction (long term conditions post stroke).R12's bladder evaluation, dated 11/4/25, indicated R12 had functional incontinence which could be related to the following impaired mobility, manual dexterity impairment, lack of toilet or toilet substitute, use of restraints, medications. R12's care plan, dated 11/6/25, indicated R12 transferred with the assistance of an easy stand (a machine that lifts an individual…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to obtain and document an informed consent, including with explanation of risk and benefits, for 2 of 5 residents (R7, R12) reviewed for use of psychotropic medications. Findings include:R7 R7's admissions Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified R7 with severely impaired cognition, dependent for all cares, and diagnoses of anoxic brain damage (loss of oxygen to the brain for a period of time resulting in damage), seizures, schizophrenia, and dysphagia (impaired swallowing). In addition, R7 had a feeding tube for nutrition. R7 physician orders dated 8/18/25 identified: Haloperidol [psychotropic] Oral Tablet 5MG, Give 5mg via G-Tube two times a day for . related to SCHIZOPHRENIA,UNSPECIFIED (F20.0);CATATONIC SCHIZOPHRENIA (F20.2). R7's medication administration records (MARs) identified R7 was administered Haloperidol August 2025: 51 doses, September 2025: 60 doses, October 2025: 61 doses, missing dose on October 29 8:00 a.m. timeslot, November…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based in interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a resident had an appropriate diagnosis and indication for use for a prescribed antipsychotic medication for one of five residents (R12) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include:R12's admission minimal data set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated R12 was admitted to the care facility on 10/29/25, had moderate cognitive impairment and had received antipsychotic medication during the 7-day lookback period.R12's diagnoses list, dated 10/29/25, indicated R12 was at the care facility with a primary diagnosis of sequelae of cerebral infarction (long term conditions post stroke).R12's physician orders, dated 10/29/25, indicated R12 had an order for Seroquel (an antipsychotic medication) 12.5 milligrams (mg) at bedtime.R12's November medication administration record (MAR) indicated R12 had received a dose of Seroquel every evening that month for a total of 19 doses.R12's electronic medical record (EMR) lacked evidence R12 had an appropriate…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to ensure a bed bound resident was care planned for, and received, adequate activities for social and mental stimulation for one of two residents (R20) reviewed for activities. Findings include:R20s significant change minimal data set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated R20 was admitted to the care facility on 3/20/19 and was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living. The MDS further indicated R20 was not assessed for activity preferences nor did staff complete an activity assessment. R20's diagnoses list indicated R20 had several medical diagnoses including aphasia and hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, dated 4/19/20.R20's Census report indicated R20 was admitted to hospice services on 7/24/24 and revoked hospice on 10/10/25.R20's Activity Participation Review, dated 9/18/25, indicated R20 preferred to listen to his favorite music in his room and watch[es] TV. He likes to have…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0811 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are assessed for appropriateness for a feeding assistant program, receive services as per their plan of care, and feeding assistants are trained and supervised.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure that residents requiring assistance with eating were provided services by qualified staff for 1 of 1 residents (R47) reviewed requiring a mechanically altered diet.Findings include: R47's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated R47 had severe cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for assistance with eating. The MDS indicated R47 was on a mechanically altered diet and utilized a feeding tube.R47's care plan dated 7/2/25, indicated R47 required assistance from staff with eating. R47's speech therapy discharge note dated 10/7/25, indicated R47 had a diagnosis of dysphagia, respiratory failure, and a traumatic brain injury. The note from the speech therapist recommended R47 be on a minced & moist (food consists of small, soft lumps) diet with thin liquids. The note indicated R47 required staff supervision/assistance at mealtime to swallow safely. The note indicated R47 should be sitting at 90 degrees while…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0847 — isolated
  Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure binding arbitration agreements of 1 of 3 residents (R23) were clearly communicated in a form and manner that they understood prior to signing the forms. Findings include:R23's quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] identified R23 with intact cognition and no impairment in memory or mood.Record review of R23's MN admission Packet in her electronic medical record (EMR) identified admission to facility on 1/20/23, however it was electronically signed 11/17/25, by both R23 and the social services director (SS-D).During interview with R23 on 11/18/25 at 10:56 a.m., R23 verified she had been a resident of the facility since January of 2023 and had no memory issues. R23 stated she was aware of what arbitration is and defined it as, arbitration is when you have a dispute of some kind and both sides agree to have somebody to listen to both sides. Let them decide instead of going to a jury. R23 stated no one from the facility spoke to her on 11/17/25…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a self administration assessment (SAM) and a physician's order was completed to allow a resident to safely administer their own medication for 1 of 1 resident (R18) observed with medication at the bedside. Findings include: R18's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R18 had intact cognition, and cardiorespiratory conditions, pneumonia, respiratory failure, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or chronic lung disease. R18's Medical Diagnosis form undated, indicated R18 had chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (low oxygen levels in the body), pneumonia due to other gram-negative bacteria, obstructive sleep apnea, dyspnea (shortness of breath), other specified chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, emphysema, and bronchiectasis (a condition where the airways widen and causes coughing with mucus and frequent infections) uncomplicated. R18's Physician Orders form indicated the following orders: •…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure freedom of movement was not restricted when multiple pillows were placed by nursing staff adjacent to the resident's body, blocking the egress section of a perimeter mattress, underneath the fitted sheet which could not be removed easily by the resident for 1 of 1 resident (R104) reviewed for potential restraints. Findings include: R104's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified he had severely impaired cognition, and hallucinations and delusions had occurred. There was no behavior directed toward others and no rejection of care. Diagnoses included traumatic brain injury and anxiety. Falls occurred prior to entry but none since admission. Trunk restraints were not used. Extensive assist of two staff were required for bed mobility and transfers. R104's Care Area Assessment (CAA) for falls dated 10/22/24, was triggered due to a potential for falling due to poor muscle control and use of psychotropic meds. He was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure orders for compression were implemented for 2 of 2 residents (R40, R45) reviewed for edema. Findings include: R40's Optional State Assessment (OSA) dated 9/8/24, indicated R40 had intact cognition, did not reject cares, and required limited assistance with bed mobility, transfers, and toilet use. R40's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated they had no impairment to range of motion, used a walker, and required partial to moderate assistance for showering/bathing, dressing lower body, and donning and doffing footwear. R40's Medical Diagnosis form undated indicated the following diagnoses: heart failure, difficulty in walking, cognitive communication deficit, neoplasm (tumor) of unspecified behavior of brain, malignant neoplasm of unspecified part of right bronchus or lung, secondary malignant neoplasm of brain, and metabolic encephalopathy. R40's Physician Orders form indicated the following orders; 10/11/24,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$144,586 in federal fines across 13 penalties.

• $76,140 — penalty dated 2025-11-20
• $17,989 — penalty dated 2024-10-24
• $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-10-30
• $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-10-23
• $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-10-17
• $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-10-10
• $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-10-02
• $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-09-25
• $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-09-18
• $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-09-11
• $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-09-05
• $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-08-28
• $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-08-21

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MONARCH HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT — 45 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $546K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MN