No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

The Waterview Pines LLC

1201 8th Street South, Virginia, MN 55792 · For profit - Partnership · 83 certified beds · (218) 748-7809 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0605, F0609, F0610) — most recent Jan 2026Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$10,036 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (39) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $10,036 in federal fines (most recent 2024-03-20)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (57%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS
Urgent care / clinic
505 S 12th Ave W · (800) 230-7526 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1001 13th St S · (218) 741-6603 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Aldi0.3 mi
1414 S 12th Ave · (855) 955-2534 · Call to confirm hours
Park
919 6th St S · (218) 748-7506 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased7.9%18.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.0%4.1%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder2.3%1.9%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.7%2.6%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms5.4%4.1%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.2%4.0%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened12.4%20.5%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication9.2%12.5%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%96.1%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers7.7%5.2%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control19.8%24.5%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table20.0%17.1%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.7%1.9%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.2%82.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission14.0%23.5%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit17.0%14.8%12.0%worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

64.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 58 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

64.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
41.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.35U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.19hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.16hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 41.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 43 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 59% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF64.8%CMS range 51.8–76.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.0%CMS range 6.2–13.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge41.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge34.9%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge34.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge87.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.4%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened4.1%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.7%CMS range 4.0–13.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.981.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.79
RN hours/ resident / day
0.62
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.88
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.30
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.49
RN hoursweekends
57.1%
Total nursing turnover
62.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 83 beds and averages 59.1 residents a day — about 71% occupied, or roughly 24 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.30 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.79 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.88 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.93 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.45 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.91 to 0.49 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 57% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-15)
15
at the previous standard inspection (2024-11-20)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

39 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-08-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to develop and implement a procedure to determine appropriate sling types for 3 residents (R1, R2, R3) assessed to require the use of mechanical lift for transfers. This resulted in a fall from a ceiling lift resulting in non-surgical fractures and a head laceration for R1 and observation of the wrong sling size, sling type in their room or being used by staff for R2 and R3. This resulted in immediate jeopardy (IJ) for R1, R2 and R3. The immediate jeopardy began on 8/1/25, when R1 fell while being transferred in a full body mechanical lift and fell out of the lift during transfer, resulting in a serious injury. The facility failed to identify if the staff were correctly using the lift per manufacturer recommendation when the incident occurred and failed to review other residents at risk to ensure proper use of mechanical lifts to prevent future falls. Additional transfer observations identified manufacturer's guidelines were not followed for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-03-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for 1 of 3 residents (R1) who was at risk for elopement. This resulted in an immediate jeopardy (IJ) for R1 when she eloped from the facility, and was found outside after an indeterminable amount of time. The facility implemented corrective action prior to the investigation so the deficiency was issued at Past Noncompliance. The IJ began on 3/10/24 at 11:00 a.m. when dietary aide (DA)-A discovered R1 outside of the facility on the sidewalk, approximately 30 feet from the door. Weather Underground identified the temperature in Virginia, MN was 19 degrees Fahrenheit (F) at 10:53 a.m. The administrator and director of nursing (DON) were informed of the IJ on 3/20/24 at 4:10 p.m. The facility had implemented corrective action on 3/14/24, prior to the start of the survey and was therefore Past Noncompliance. Findings include: R1's face sheet dated 3/19/24 indicated R1 had diagnoses of schizophrenia, borderline personality…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a registered nurse (RN) was scheduled for a minimum of eight hours a day. This had the potential to affect all 67 residents who resided at the facility. This was at past non-compliance do to no RN coverage addressed in the last two quarterly staffing records.Findings include: Review of the facility Staffing Schedules dated 1/1/25 through 6/30/25, revealed there was no RN coverage for the following dates: 1/25/25, 1/26/25, 2/9/25, 3/22/25, 3/23/25, 4/5/25, 4/6/25, 4/19/25, 4/20/25, 5/3/25, 5/4/25, 5/17/25, 5/18/25, 5/26/25, 6/14/25, 6/28/25, and 6/29/25.During an interview on 1/13/26 at 3:43 p.m., the corporate administrator stated the facility had a lot of issues with higher and getting agency staff to work during the first part of the year. The facility was aware there were several days from 1/1/25 through 6/30/25 that did not have RN coverage as required. They daily staffing schedules for 1/1/25 through 6/30/25 were reviewed by the corporate administrator and facility administrator and confirmed there were no RN…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based interview and record review the facility failed to ensure psychotropic PRN (as needed) medication orders were timed limited to a duration of 14 days for 1 of 5 residents (R9) who was reviewed for psychotropic medications. Findings include: R9's quarterly Minimum Date Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R9 was cognitively intact with diagnoses of anxiety disorder, major depression, diabetes, and chronic diastolic heart failure. MDS section N. indicated R9 received high risk anti-anxiety medications. R9's facility provided undated Care Plan identified focus areas and interventions to support and monitor R9's behavior and mental health needs related to diagnoses of depression, anxiety, insomnia. Upon entering the facility on 1/12/26 R9's electronic medical record (EMR) orders included the order: alprazolam take 0.5mg every 24 hours as needed (PRN) for increased anxiety. The ordered date was 9/15/20/25. The order did not have a stop date. Pharmacy Consult Recommendations included:-10/22/25: the resident has…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to review and revise the resident care plan to include chemotherapy, breathing problems and oxygen use for 1 of 3 residents (R31) reviewed for care planning.R31's quarterly minimum data set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified a diagnosis of congestive heart failure (CHF), rectal cancer, and atrial fibrillation.R31's care plan, dated 12/11/25, didn't contain a focus statement for coordination and care of R31's chemotherapy treatments, breathing problems or oxygen use.R31's provider orders, dated 1/12/26, didn't contain orders for oxygen use or the care and keeping of oxygen equipment.R31's Weights and Vitals Summary identified R31 was wearing oxygen via nasal cannula on dates when oxygen saturation levels were recorded starting on 10/29/25 through 1/15/26.R31's provider progress note dated 10/29/25, identified new orders related to CHF: repeat chest x-ray next week, monitor vital signs every shift for two weeks, monitor oxygen saturation every…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to perform their own activities of daily living (ADL)s received nail care for 1 of 3 residents (R44) reviewed for ADLs.R44's quarterly minimum data set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified significant cognitive impairment and a diagnosis of late-onset Alzheimer's dementia. The MDS further indicated R44 was dependent in all ADLs. R44's care plan, dated 8/6/25, identified a focus statement for assistance with ADLs related to dementia, osteoarthritis, weakness and falls. Interventions included an assist of one with all ADL tasks including nail care, specifically to trim fingernails and toenails as needed on shower days. The care plan didn't include podiatry care for her toenails, nor did it address behavior or resistance to having nails trimmed. R44's provider orders, dated 8/6/25, identified an order to check fingernails and toenails once a week and provide nail care every Wednesday. Document in nursing note of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure orders were in place for a resident receiving oxygen for 1 of 7 residents (R31). In addition, the facility failed to assess and treat lower extremity edema for 1 of 7 residents (R23) reviewed for quality of care. Findings include: R31: R31's quarterly minimum data set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified a diagnosis of congestive heart failure (CHF), rectal cancer, and atrial fibrillation. R31's care plan, dated 12/11/25, didn't contain a focus statement for breathing or oxygen use. R31's provider orders, dated 1/12/26, didn't contain orders for oxygen use or the care and keeping of oxygen equipment. R31's Weights and Vitals Summary identified R31 was wearing oxygen via nasal cannula on dates when oxygen saturation levels were recorded starting on 10/29/25 through 1/15/26. During an observation and interview on 1/12/26 at 3:35 p.m., R31 was observed wearing an oxygen cannula on his nose, the oxygen concentrator was set at one liter per…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure portable oxygen tanks were safely transported and/or secured for 1 of 2 residents (R23) reviewed for oxygen safety. Findings include: R23's admit Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R23 was moderately cognitively impaired with diagnoses of venous insufficiency, acute respiratory failure, and ischemic cardiomyopathy. R23's Care Plan included focus area: Alterations in oxygen/gas exchange with oxygen use as ordered. R23's Order Summary Report dated as of 1/15/2026, included the following orders: Check portable oxygen/stroller every shift and fill if needed, and Oxygen Delivery System via 2LPM nasal cannula continuously for diagnosis acute respiratory failure with hypoxia. R23's Treatment Administration Record for the month of January 2026, had documented entries between 1/1/26 and 1/14/26,that indicated staff had checked R23's portable oxygen/stroller every shift and filled if needed. During an interview on 1/12/2026 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to monitor fluid intake for a resident on a fluid restriction and on dialysis. This effected 1 of 2 (R8) residents reviewed for dialysis.Findings include: R8's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated R8 was cognitively intact. Diagnoses included anemia, coronary artery disease, and end stage renal disease. R8 received hemodialysis while at the facility. R8 care plan dated 12/11/25, indicated risk of complications related to dialysis. Interventions included fluid restriction per order. The care plan also indicated a potential alteration in nutrition related to end stage renal disease on a 1500 milliliter (ml) fluid restriction. R8's Order Summary Report (OSR) dated 12/10/25, indicated a provider order for 1500 ml per 24 hours was entered. 600 ml came from nursing and 900 ml came from dietary Review of R8's Treatment Assessment Report (TAR) from 12/10/25 to 1/14/25 indicated there was a fluid restriction of 1500 ml every 24 hours that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to perform appropriate hand hygiene while doing a brief change. The facility also failed to utilize appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) for a resident in enhanced barrier precautions. This affected 2 of 5 resident (R54, R6) reviewed for infection control.Findings include: R6: R6's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified he had diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a progressive lung condition that blocks airflow, making it hard to breath), right foot drop, spinal stenosis lumbar region with neurogenic claudication (nerve compression in the lower back from a narrowed spinal canal, causing symptoms like leg pain, cramping, numbness, or weakness that worsen with standing/walking), heart failure (the heart can't pump enough oxygen-rich blood to meet the body's needs), hypertension, and opioid dependence. In addition, R6's MDS identified he was cognitively intact and was dependent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to promote dignity and respect for 1 of 3 residents (R1) who required assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) and reported rough and disrespectful care by staff.Findings include: R1's Entry Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified admission to facility on 9/25/25, from an acute care hospital. R1's care plan (CP) dated 9/26/25, identified he was vulnerable to abuse and instructed staff to monitor for signs of emotional distress, mood or behavior changes and continue to follow the facility's Vulnerable Abuse Reporting policy and directed R1 was independent with activity choices and staff were to respect his choices of preferred room leisure time. CP also indicated R1 had an alteration in mobility related to colon cancer, edema (fluid retention), pain, and malnutrition with a goal he would move safely within his environment; staff were directed to assist with movement in bed and in/out of bed assist of one with front wheeled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and document review the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of staff to resident abuse and protect residents during the investigation for 1 of 3 residents (R1) who reported a staff handled their care roughly, causing them pain. Findings include: R1's entry Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], from an acute care hospital. R1's care plan (CP) dated 9/26/25, identified he was vulnerable to abuse and instructed staff to monitor for signs of emotional distress, mood or behavior changes and continue to follow the facility's Vulnerable Abuse Reporting policy and directed R1 was independent with activity choices and staff were to respect his choices of preferred room leisure time. CP also indicated R1 had an alteration in mobility related to colon cancer, edema (fluid retention), pain, and malnutrition with a goal he would move safely within his environment; staff were directed to assist with movement in bed and in/out of bed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 27 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review the facility failed to report an allegation of neglect of care related to a fall from a mechanical lift to the state agency (SA) for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for use of mechanical lifts.R1's admission Record indicated she admitted to the facility 6/1/23. R1's diagnosis included dementia with behavioral disturbance, back pain, other chronic pain, and spinal stenosis. R1's care plan dated 6/30/25, identified an alteration in cognition and an alteration in mobility. The care plan directed staff to transfer R1 via celling lift using a toileting sling when using the toilet and a full body split leg sling for all other transfers. R1's Incident Review and Analysis dated 8/1/25, indicated Staff was transferring R1 from the bathroom to the bed using a toileting sling and R1 fell out onto the floor and hit her head. During interview with the administrator and DON on 8/6/25 at 4:46 p.m., the administrator stated R1 was in a toileting sling and she fell through because she placed her arms inside the sling. The administrator stated the incident had not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to thoroughly investigate a fall from a lift resulting in significant injury for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for neglect of care.R1's admission Record indicated she admitted to the facility 6/1/23. R1's diagnosis included dementia with behavioral disturbance, back pain, other chronic pain, and spinal stenosis. R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified severe cognitive impairment and indicated she displayed no behaviors. The care plan indicted R1 was dependent on staff for transfers and was always incontinent of bowel and bladder.R1's Lift/Mobility Status Form dated 10/7/24, indicated she was unable to bear weight, was unable to follow simple instructions and was not cooperative with transfers. The form indicated use of a ceiling lift with assistance from one staff.R1's care plan dated 6/30/25, identified an alteration in cognition and an alteration in mobility. The care plan directed staff to transfer R1 via celling lift using a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure voiced concerns about the provision of care were acted upon timely and resolved to help potentially prevent occurrences for 3 of 3 residents (R1, R4, R6) reviewed who had voiced concerns about care from a staff member. Findings include: A facility-reported Vulnerable Adult Maltreatment Report (i.e,, FRI) dated, 7/16/25, identified R1 reported being handled roughly by a nursing assistant (NA) the night prior. The report identified NA-A as the alleged perpetrator and outlined they had been terminated from the care center. The report continued and identified another resident (R6) had reported concerns about how NA-A had transferred them and, again, that NA-A was rough with cares.R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified R1 had moderate cognitive impairment but demonstrated no delusional thinking. On 7/24/25 at 11:27 a.m., R1 was interviewed and recalled the incident from the week prior. R1 expressed it involved a male staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-11-20 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure there was a sufficient number of staff to ensure all resident cares were completed timely for 9 of 9 anonymous reporters (AR-8, AR-1, AR-2, AR-3, AR-3, AR-4, AR-5, AR-6, and AR-7) interviewed. Also for family members, (FM)-L with concerns of resident (R32) being left soiled for extended periods of time, and nail care not being provided and environment being left soiled with stool, FM-K for long call light times, and FM-C for having to provide care themselves to ensure bedtime cares would be completed. In addition, residents R29 and R7 for long call light wait times, resulting in urinary incontinence for R7, R32 who was not assisted with morning cares until 2:30 in the afternoon, R4 for lack of nail care, R8 who was receiving end of life cares, but not repositioned and provided comfort cares timely, and R1 who did not receive pain medications timely due to inadequate staffing. In addition six residents (R1, R5, R21, R22, R31, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure orders for respiratory care were implemented for 1 of 1 (R23) resident reviewed for respiratory care. Findings include: On 11/17/24 at 5:29 p.m., R23 was in her room lying in bed wearing oxygen per nasal cannula at 2 liters per minute. R23's oxygen was humidified and the bottle was dated 10/16/24. R23's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R23 had diagnoses which included centrilobular emphysema (a form of chronic lung disease), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe), pulmonary fibrosis (a condition in which the lungs become scarred over time. Symptoms include shortness of breath, a dry cough), atherosclerosis of aorta (a condition where plaque builds up in the walls of the aorta), morbid obesity with alveolar hypoventilation (insufficient ventilation), and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (an absence of enough oxygen in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to to ensure timely repositioning and coordination of care for a hospice patient with a change in condition for 1 of 5 (R8) residents; to ensure provider orders for weight monitoring were followed for 1 of 5 (R26) residents; to ensure dressing changes were completed as ordered for 1 of 5 (R40) residents; to ensure placement of ankle-foot orthosis (AFO) for 1 of 5 (R32) residents; and to ensure timely delivery of medications for 1 of 5 (R1) residents reviewed for quality of care. Findings include: R8: R8's significant change in condition Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified moderately intact cognition and diagnoses of dementia and congestive heart failure. R8 was dependent on staff for eating, bed mobility and toileting. R8's provider orders dated 9/30/24, identified hospice care through Essentia East Range Hospice with orders to call hospice first for changes in condition, need for additional services, medications, supplies,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure residents were supervised by nursing staff or trained feeding staff during dining for 1 of 1 (R20) resident reviewed for dining. Findings include: R20's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R20's diagnoses included, dementia, multiple sclerosis (a disease in which the immune system eats away the protective covering of nerves), depression, and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). R20's MDS identified R20 was severely cognitively impaired and required partial to moderate assistance with eating. On 11/18/24 at 6:24 p.m., one resident (R20) remained in the dining room with one dietary staff clearing tables. R20 remained at her table eating and drinking. -at 6:35 p.m., R20 remained alone in the dining room drinking beverages. -at 6:40 p.m., the dietary manager asked R20 if she wanted a ride to her room, shortly after that a nursing assistant entered the dining room and said she would take R20 to her room. On 11/19/24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to dispose of an expired bottle of half and half that was still available for residents to use. This had the ability to effect every resident who used half and half during meals. Findings included: On 11/19/24 at 1:24 p.m., an opened bottle of [NAME] half and half dairy product was noted in the refrigerator of the dinning hall dinette room. Hand written on the bottle was an open date of 11/8/24. The manufacture's expiration date was 11/14/24. During an interview on 11/19/24 at 1:30 p.m., culinary aide (CA)-A looked at the bottle and confirmed 11/8/24, was the dated the bottle was first opened. CA-A also acknowledged 11/14/24, was the manufacturer's expiration date on the bottle of half and half. CA-A stated dairy products like half and half are only good for 5 days after they are opened so this bottle of half and half should have been thrown away on 11/13/24, but for sure on 11/14/24, when the manufacturer says the dairy product is expired.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and document reivew, the facility failed to ensure care was provided to preserve dignity for 1 of 3 residents (R52) that were reviewed for dignity. Findings include: R52's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R52 was cognitively intact with diagnoses of diabetes, depression, hemiplegia, and hemiparesis. Section GG -Functional Abilities and Goals indicated R52 required moderate assistance for personal hygiene and maximal assistance for shower/baths. R52's care plan last reviewed 10/8/24, included: -Focus area altered cognition related to anxiety - Resident will have all needs met by staff. Resident has a dx of anxiety and will not often utilize the call light or verbalize feelings or needs in fear of being a burden to staff. -Focus area altered elimination interventions identified resident is very shy and does not like to ask for help, she has a history of being very incontinent r/t not asking for assistance. -Focus area alterations in mood and behavior…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-20 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure resident preference of being dressed and eating breakfast in the dining room was honored for 1 of 1 resident (R32) reviewed for resident rights. Findings include: R32's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], Section C - Cognitive Patterns, did not include a completed Brief Interview for Mental status. R32's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], indicated R32 had significant cognitive impairment. R32's diagnoses included neurological disorders, heart failure and non-Alzheimer's dementia with depression and anxiety. Section GG identified R32 required maximal assistance to total dependence for ADL's and was dependent for transfers. R32's careplan last reviewed 8/14/24, identified R32 preferred to dine in the main dining room and instructed staff to encourage resident to attend meals in the dining room where he could visit with others. Further, R32's care plan identified R32 required assistance with ADLS and preferred to get ready by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure equipment was not broken for 1 of 1 resident (R25) reviewed for environment. Findings include: On 11/17/24 at 2:03 p.m., R25 stated her toilet was broken and she was concerned about it. When facing the toilet the right side of the bowel was cracked near where the seat attached. On 11/19/24 at 1:06 p.m., licensed practical nurse (LPN)-A stated nursing assistants doesn't usually fill out a Tels slip, if something is broken they tell the nurse or call maintenance. On 11/19/24 at 1:08 p.m., LPN-B stated if staff see broken equipment they fill out a maintenance slip and it goes right into the computer to be fixed. LPN-B stated she was not aware of any residents complaining about a broken toilet. On 11/19/24 at 1:24 p.m., the regional director of maintenance (RDM)-A looked at the toilet and verified it was cracked. RDM-A stated the whole bowl needs to be replaced. RDM-A verified a request slip had not been filled out and stated he would have expected housekeeping to notice the cracked toilet and report it.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-20 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to complete all sections on the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for 2 of 18 residents (R23, R14) reviewed for resident assessment. Findings include: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) Long-Term Resident Facility Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual dated 10/2024, identified The purpose of this manual is to offer clear guidance about how to use the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) correctly and effectively to help provide appropriate care. Providing care to residents with post-hospital and long-term care needs is complex and challenging work. Clinical competence, observational, interviewing and critical thinking skills, and assessment expertise from all disciplines are required to develop individualized care plans. The RAI helps nursing home staff gather definitive information on a resident's strengths and needs, which must be addressed in an individualized care plan. It also assists staff with evaluating goal achievement and revising care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure activities of daily living (ADL) were addressed for 2 of 4 residents (R4, R32) reviewed for ADLs. Findings include: R4: R4's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R4's diagnoses included traumatic brain dysfunction, diabetes mellitus, hemiplegia/hemiparesis (a symptom that causes partial or total paralysis on one side of the body/muscle weakness or partial paralysis on one side of the body), and traumatic brain injury (TBI). R4's quarterly MDS identified R4 was severely cognitively impaired, sometimes understood and sometimes understands, had unclear speech, and was dependent on staff for ADLs. R4's care plan dated 8/21/19, identified R4 had a self care deficit with dressing, grooming, and bathing related to weakness and TBI. Interventions included nursing assistant to perform nail care for hands and feet on bath day. Weekly skin care assessments dated 11/11/24, 10/28/24, and 10/14/24, documented fingernails…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to educate and document the education and refusals for pressure ulcer relief for 1 of 3 (R35) residents. In addition, the facility failed to ensure weekly skin inspections were performed as ordered and timely notification of the registered dietician (RD) of a resident's new and worsening wounds for 1 of 3 (R39) residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Finding include: R35's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R35 had diagnoses which included hemiplegia and hemiparesis (muscle weakness or partial paralysis on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, dementia with behavioral disturbance, diabetes mellitus, depression, and morbid obesity due to excess calorie intake. R35's MDS identified he was severely cognitively impaired and required substantial/maximal assistance to dependent for activities of daily living. R35's care plan identified R35 had stage II pressure ulcer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-20 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure a palm protector was used for 1 of 1 (R4) residents reviewed for range of motion. Findings include: R4's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R4's diagnoses included traumatic brain dysfunction, hemiplegia/hemiparesis (a symptom that causes partial or total paralysis on one side of the body/muscle weakness or partial paralysis on one side of the body), and traumatic brain injury (TBI). R4's quarterly MDS identified R4 was severely cognitively impaired, sometimes understood and sometimes understands, had unclear speech, and was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs). R4's care plan dated 6/28/22, identified R4 had a self care deficit with dressing, grooming, and bathing related to weakness and TBI. Interventions included encouraging resident to wear foam built-up palm protector under left 4th and 5th digit to reduce contraction. Palm protector was to be on overnight and removed in the morning.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-20 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure orders for the use of PRN (as needed) lorazepam, a psychotropic medication (mood altering medication) was time limited to 14 days of use with a documented associated diagnosis for 1 of 5 residents (R28) reviewed for PRN psychotropic medication use. Findings include: R28's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R28 had severe cognitive impairment. MDS Section I - Active diagnoses listed dementia, hyperlipidemia, arthritis, low back pain, ataxia, and adult failure to thrive. There were no diagnoses selected in Section I, Psychiatric/Mood Disorder Diagnosis. R28's careplan last reviewed 10/30/24, included psychotropic drug ADR [adverse drug reaction] monitoring, identified target behaviors and provided interventions for alterations in cognition, communication, and mood. R28's Order Summary Report dated 11/5/24, signed by provider on 11/8/24, included the following orders: -Lorazepam oral tablet 0.5 mg, give 1 tablet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-20 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the security of medical records for 1 of 1 (R8) resident reviewed for coordination of hospice care. Findings include: R8's significant change in condition Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified moderately intact cognition and diagnoses of dementia and congestive heart failure. R8 was dependent on staff for eating, bed mobility and toileting. R8's provider orders dated 9/30/24, identified hospice care through Essentia East Range Hospice with orders to call hospice first for changes in condition, need for additional services, medications, supplies, questions, concerns, and notification of death. R8's care plan dated 3/14/23, identified hospice care related to end-stage disease process with interventions to maintain communication with hospice and keep them informed of resident's condition, or changes in condition, as needed. The Essentia Hospice care plan was not part of R8's electronic health record (EHR). On 11/19/24 at 2:48 p.m.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure an elopement incident was reported to the State Agency (SA) not later than 24 hours for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for elopement. Findings include: A facility reported incident (FRI) submitted to the SA on 3/11/24 at 4:35 p.m. indicated R1 was found outside in her wheelchair, around 11:00 a.m. on 3/10/24. After further investigation, it was discovered the Code Alert Wander Management System sensor (a system that alerts staff when residents nears or exits an area of the building) had gone off for some time and when staff checked the door, they didn't see anyone and cleared the alarm. Upon staff clearing the alarm, R1 was found on the sidewalk next to the building. When bringing R1 back into the building, the alarm went off again. R1's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated R1 had delusions, severe cognitive impairment, and wandering that placed R1 at significant risk of getting to a potentially dangerous place.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-05 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a registered nurse (RN) was scheduled for a minimum of eight consecutive hours a day. This had the potential to affect all 54 residents who resided at the facility. Findings include: The last two quarters of facility PBJ Staffing Data Reports, dated 1/1/23 through 3/31/23 and 4/1/23 through 6/30/23, identified the facility failed to have RN coverage for the dates of 3/11/23, 3/26/23, 5/21/23, 6/3/23, 6/4/23, and 6/24/23. The undated, facility payroll reports confirmed the facility did not have RN coverage for the specific dates listed on the PBJ Staffing Data Reports. During an interview on 10/3/23 at 5:45 p.m., administrator stated he knew why the specific payroll dates were requested as he was aware of no RN coverage on those dates. During an interview on 10/4/23 at 3:28 p.m., scheduling coordinator identified they are a union building and they must go through a seniority process. They have one RN in their float pool and if they aren't available, they attempt to use two different staffing agencies. It is often…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Waiver has been granted
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-05 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to provide pneumococcal conjugate vaccine 20 variant (PVC20) education as directed by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) for 4 of 5 residents (R32, R34, R40, R57) reviewed for immunizations. Findings include: R32's undated, facesheet identified R32 admitted to the facility on [DATE], and was [AGE] years old. R32's undated, Minnesota Immunization Report, identified R32 received the pneumococcal polysaccharide (PPSV23) on 4/25/91 and 10/17/97. R32 received the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV-13) on 6/13/17 and 6/16/17. R32's electronic health record (EHR) did not include evidence R32 or R32's representative received education regarding pneumococcal vaccine booster and there was no indication R32 was offered the pneumococcal vaccine per CDC guidance. R34's undated, facesheet identified R34 admitted to the facility on [DATE], and was [AGE] years old. R34's undated, Minnesota Immunization Report, failed to identify a history of pneumococcal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-05 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to provide the required liability and appeal rights notice two days or more prior to discharge from Medicare A services for 1 of 3 residents (R260) reviewed for beneficiary protection notification. Findings include: R260's last day of covered Medicare Part A Skilled Services was 6/20/23, as identified on the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (form CMS-10123). Form CMS-10123 was signed by R260 on 6/19/23. During an interview on 10/03/23 at 4:48 p.m., social services consultant stated she was unsure why form CMS-10123 wasn't done timely and should have been completed on 6/18/23. A progress note from 6/16/23, identified a last Medicare part A coverage date of 6/20/23, so the facility had time to issue form CMS-10123 prior to 6/19/23. The facility ABN/NOMNC Policy and Procedure dated 2/20/23, identified the business office manager as the primary person responsible for completing the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage and it must be completed within 48 hours of being notified of a last covered day for a Medicare/Managed Care primary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to provide sufficient bowel tracking and notification to nursing of bowel movements for 1 of 2 residents (R9) reviewed for constipation. Findings include: R9's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified R9 had intact cognition and a diagnosis of colitis. R9's physician orders dated 8/4/23, directed staff to give docusate sodium 100 milligrams (mg) every morning and at bedtime for constipation; and sennosides-docusate sodium 8.6-50 grams every morning and at bedtime for constipation. R9's care plan dated 8/21/23, failed to address bowel tracking or identify issues with R9's bowel movements or constipation. R9's nursing progress note dated 8/23/23, identified R9 was constipated and was given milk of magnesia. The medical record lacked further notes regarding constipation and further treatments after 8/23/23. R9's physician orders dated 9/1/23, identified bisacodyl rectal suppository 10 mg for constipation as needed for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure interventions were implemented to promote healing and prevent pressure ulcer deterioration for 1 of 4 residents (R47) reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings include: R47's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified R47 was cognitively intact and had diagnoses of left-sided hemiplegia (loss of motor function on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (one-sided weakness), venous insufficiency, diabetes mellitus with foot ulcer, non-pressure chronic ulcer right heel and midfoot, and noncompliance with medical treatment. R47 needed extensive assistance with bed mobility, was at risk for developing pressure ulcers, and had stage two and three pressure ulcers. R47's pressure ulcer Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 7/14/23, identified R47 had two stage three pressure ulcers and made note of the wound care provider documenting the wounds as pressure ulcers. MDS coding followed provider documentation. Care plan considerations…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-05 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to act upon consultant pharmacist's recommendation for 1 of 5 residents (R47) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: R47's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R47 was cognitively intact and had diagnoses of diabetes mellitus with foot ulcer and non-pressure, chronic ulcers of the right heel. R47's provider orders dated 5/18/23, identified saccharomyces boulardii (a pro-biotic supplement) one capsule daily to be given for gut health during antibiotic therapy, but did not include an order for an antibiotic. A Consultant Pharmacist Medication Regimen Review form dated 7/20/23, identified a concern with the medication saccharomyces boulardii to be given for gut health during antibiotic therapy. The pharmacist's recommendation was to consider stopping the medication or updating the directions as R47 was no longer taking oral antibiotics. During an interview on 10/4/23 at 3:00 p.m., the director of nursing (DON)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-20 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to accommodate resident needs by ensuring the call light was within reach for 3 of 3 residents (R1, R2, R3) reviewed for call light usage. R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated R1 had severely impaired cognition with a diagnosis of stroke. R1's care plan dated 7/12/23 indicated R1 was at risk for falls with an intervention of Keep call light within reach. On 9/20/23 at 12:37 p.m., R1 was observed sitting in a wheelchair. R1's call light was attached to the bed behind R1. R1 was able to answer questions with either yes/no or other one-word answers. R1 answered no when asked if he was able to reach the call light. R1 answered holler when asked what he would do if staff assistance was needed. R2's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] indicated R2 had intact cognition with a diagnosis of congestive heart disease. R2's care plan dated 7/19/23 indicated R2 was at risk for falls with interventions of Call, don't fall sign in room and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2026-01-15 · tag F0577 — widespread
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the past three years of recertification and complaint survey results were available for review. This had the potential to affect all 67 residents residing in the facility, as well as family, visitors and staff.Findings include: On 1/12/26, at 7:27 p.m., a review of the survey binder was completed. Upon review of the survey binder, it was noted that all required recertification surveys, as well as complaint investigation surveys were present, with the exception of the recertification and complaint surveys for the year 2023. During an interview on 1/13/26 at 3:34 p.m., the administrator stated there should be three years of recertification and complaint surveys available for all residents, family and visits to view when wanted. the administrator stated she had just gone through the survey binder a month ago and made sure all needed surveys were in the binder.During an interview on 1/13/26 at 3:48 p.m., the corporate administrator reviewed the survey binder and confirmed all surveys from 2023 were missing and should…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · No revisit needed
  • No harm found · C2024-11-20 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, document review, and interview the facility failed to ensure required nurse staffing information was posted daily over the weekend, this deficient practice had the potential to impact all 53 residents residing at the facility and visitors who may wish to review this information. Findings include: During an observation on Sunday, 11/17/24 at 6:32 p.m., the posted staffing sheet was dated Friday 11/15/24. For the remainder of the survey, Monday 11/18/24, to Wednesday 11/20/24, the daily staffing information sheets were updated and posted each day. During an interview on 11/20/24 at 3:49 p.m., the administrator stated the staffing hours should be updated and posted daily including weekend days. The charge nurse is given staffing sheets, and they are responsible to update and get the staffing hours posted on Saturdays and Sundays. The charge nurse should have posted a new staffing sheet each day this past weekend.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$10,036 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $10,036 — penalty dated 2024-03-20

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MONARCH HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT — 45 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.2-1.2 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.1-1.1 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.7-0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.0≈ chain avg
The other 44 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Hillcrest Health Care, LLCMankato, MN 1 of 5Maplewood Rehabilitation CenterMaplewood, MN 1 of 5The Emeralds At Fairbault LLCFaribault, MN 1 of 5The Emeralds At Grand Rapids LLCGrand Rapids, MN 1 of 5The Emeralds At St Paul LLCSaint Paul, MN 1 of 5The Estates At Excelsior LLCExcelsior, MN 1 of 5The Estates At Lynnhurst LLCSaint Paul, MN 1 of 5The Villas At BrookviewGolden Valley, MN 1 of 5The Villas At New BrightonNew Brighton, MN 1 of 5The Villas At Osseo LLCOsseo, MN 1 of 5The Villas At RobbinsdaleRobbinsdale, MN 1 of 5The Villas At The CedarsSaint Louis Park, MN 1 of 5The Waterview Shores LLCTwo Harbors, MN 1 of 5The Waterview Woods LLCEveleth, MN 1 of 5Villas At Bryn Mawr LLCMinneapolis, MN 2 of 5Bayside Manor LLCGaylord, MN 2 of 5Oaklawn Health Care, LLCMankato, MN 2 of 5Parmly On The Lake LLCChisago City, MN 2 of 5The Estates At Chateau LLCMinneapolis, MN 2 of 5The Estates At Fridley LLCFridley, MN 2 of 5The Estates At Roseville LLCRoseville, MN 2 of 5The Estates At Rush City LLCRush City, MN 2 of 5The Estates At Twin Rivers LLCAnoka, MN 2 of 5The Gardens At Foley LLCFoley, MN 2 of 5The Gardens At Winsted LLCWinsted, MN 2 of 5The North Shore Estates LLCDuluth, MN 2 of 5The Villas At St Louis ParkSaint Louis Park, MN 2 of 5The Villas At St PaulSaint Paul, MN 2 of 5The Villas At The ParkSaint Louis Park, MN 3 of 5Bethany On The Lake LLCAlexandria, MN 3 of 5Laurels Peak Health Care, LLCMankato, MN 3 of 5Meeker Manor Rehablitation Center, LLCLitchfield, MN 3 of 5River Valley Health And Rehabilitation Center LLCRedwood Falls, MN 3 of 5The Estates At Bloomington LLCBloomington, MN 3 of 5The Estates At St Louis Park LLCSaint Louis Park, MN 3 of 5The Villas At RichfieldRichfield, MN 3 of 5The Villas At RosevilleRoseville, MN 4 of 5Lakeshore Rehabilitation Center LLCWaseca, MN 4 of 5Mala Strana Health Care, LLCNew Prague, MN 4 of 5Sleepy Eye Rehabilitati CenterSleepy Eye, MN

Showing 40 of 44; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
JCA HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST10%since 06/01/2019
NIJ LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST10%since 06/01/2019
SPARTAN HEALTHCARE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST30%since 06/01/2019
WBS HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST20%since 06/01/2019
YAZOMA HOLDINGS, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST30%since 06/01/2019
HALPERT, MARCIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER30%since 06/01/2019
JAFFA, NOAMIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR10%since 06/01/2019
LEGUM, JOSHUAIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE30%since 06/01/2019
STERN, WILLIAMIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER20%since 06/01/2019
MONARCH HEALTHCARE OPERATING VIII LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/01/2019

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+4.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.2M
Related-party expense16% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 55%Medicare 15%Other / private 29%

This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$367per resident / day
operating cost
$11,151per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$383per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MN

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Minnesota Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Minnesota
$10,646/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,870/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,573/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 245283. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-15, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next