Oaklawn Health Care, LLC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

65.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 97 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 66.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 47 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 59% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 52.9 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.79 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.51 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.89 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.36 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.97 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.64 to 1.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 66% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2023-10-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure safe mechanical lift transfers were completed along with following manufacturer guidelines for Med Care lift that expired, and ensuring correct sling/harness sizes for 7 of 7 residents (R4, R5, R6, R7, R8, R9, R10) who utilized this mechanical lifts. This resulted in an immediate jeopardy (IJ) for R1 who fell from the Med Care sit to stand lift resulting a fractured right femur (thigh bone) on 10/9/23. This had the likelihood for serious harm, impairment or death for R4, R5, R6, R7, R8, R9 and R10 who continued to use this Med Care sit to stand lift. In addition, the facility failed to ensure a preventive lift maintenance program was followed and staff had knowledge of using the correct size harness/sling size for their mechanical lifts. The IJ began on 10/9/23 at 9:05 p.m., when facility staff did not use two staff to transfer R1 in accordance with the care plan and follow manufacturer guidelines for Med Care lift that had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-18 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the consultant pharmacist identified and reported a medication irregularity during the required monthly drug regimen review for 1 of 1 residents (R1), when an unauthorized Haloperidol order remained active despite the resident's diagnoses of epilepsy and Parkinsonism. This failure resulted in the medication remaining on the resident's medication regimen from March through June 2026 without identification during the required monthly pharmacist reviews.R1's face sheet dated 6/17/26, identified diagnoses of localization related (focal) (partial) symptomatic epilepsy and epileptic syndromes with complex partial seizures not intractable without status epilepticus (abnormal electrical activity begins in a specific area of the brain rather than the entire brain, hallucinations, and parkinsonism (condition that affects movement). R1's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated 3/2026, identified an order for Haloperidol Lactate oral concentration (Haldol) 2 milligrams (mg)/milliliter (mL). Give 1.5 mL by mouth at bedtime…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-18 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 residents (R1) was free from a significant medication error when Haloperidol was entered into the facility's integrated electronic medication ordering system and administered to R1 from 3/13/26 through 6/9/26 without a valid and verified physician order.Findings include:The Nursing Home Incident Report (NHIR) submitted to the State Agency (SA) identified Haloperidol order intended for another resident was inadvertently entered into R1's chart. Medication was administered until review following seizure activity and discontinued upon discovery.R1's face sheet dated 6/17/26, identified diagnoses of localization related (focal) (partial) symptomatic epilepsy and epileptic syndromes with complex partial seizures not intractable without status epilepticus (abnormal electrical activity begins in a specific area of the brain rather than the entire brain, hallucinations, and parkinsonism (condition that affects movement).R1's quarterly Minimum…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to remove discontinued medications from the active medication storage for 2 of 2 residents (R3, R4) creating the potential for inadvertent medication administration. Findings include: R3During an observation and interview on 6/17/26 at 12:36 p.m., Registered nurse (RN)-A opened the medication cart and went to R3's medication section. RN-A observed R3's Lidocaine patches and Quetiapine Fumarate (Seroquel) remained in the medication cart. RN-A reviewed R3's current medication orders and stated there was not a current order for Seroquel or Lidocaine patches. RN-A removed the medications from the medication cart and stated medications should be removed from the medication cart right away after the order was discontinued to avoid medication errors. RN-A stated it was basic nursing knowledge to remove discontinued medications from the medication cart. R3's face sheet dated 6/17/26, identified diagnoses of fracture of one right rib, other chronic pain, agoraphobia with panic disorder, and generalized anxiety…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-06-10 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment for 1 of 1 residents (R2) whose room was unkept and had resident care items placed on the floor. In addition, the facility failed to perform daily cleaning in the kitchen which had the potential to affect 54/56 residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings include:R2R2's face sheet received on 6/10/26, included diagnoses of diabetes, dementia, and chronic gastritis (inflammation of stomach lining).R2's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated intact cognition, clear speech, could understand and be understood. R2 was able to eat independently and required substantial assistance or was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs). R2 did not walk. R2's physician orders dated 9/24/25, indicated to apply foot to calf wraps (black) at bedtime. Orders dated 3/23/26, indicated Ready Wraps firm and snug around foot, ankle, and calf in the morning.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-06-10 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
  Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure nutrient and/or calorie substantive snacks were offered after the evening meal and before bedtime, for 2 of 2 residents (R2, R42) when there had been more than a 14-hour lapse between the dinner meal and breakfast the following day. This had the potential to affect 54 of 56 residents who ate meals at the facility. Findings include:R2R2's face sheet received on 6/10/26, included diagnoses of diabetes, dementia, and chronic gastritis. R2's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated intact cognition, clear speech, could understand and be understood. R2 was able to eat independently but required substantial assistance or was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs). R2 did not walk. R2's physician orders dated 1/20/26, included Con/CHO (controlled carbohydrate) 2-gram sodium diet, regular.R2's care plan dated 3/11/26, indicated potential for alteration in nutrition related to diagnoses. During…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure appropriate follow-up of urine culture and sensitivity results and failed to ensure antibiotic therapy was reviewed for effectiveness for 1 of 1 resident (R32) reviewed for antibiotic use. In addition, the facility failed to ensure a nutritious snack was offered for the management of low blood sugar and failed to inform the dietician of concerns with blood sugar levels for 1 of 1 resident (R50) reviewed for food.Findings include: Antibiotic Use R32's significant change in status [NAME] Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated moderately impaired cognition, utilized a wheelchair, required supervision or touching assistance with toileting hygiene and personal hygiene, diagnoses included bladder cancer, hydronephrosis (urine doesn't fully empty from the body), and hematuria (blood in urine). R32's care plan dated 5/5/26, indicated alteration in elimination d/t (due to) weakness and assist with 2 staff and transfers, bladder cancer and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-10 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to assess and implement interventions to maintain and/or prevent loss of range of motion (ROM) for 1 of 1 resident (R21) reviewed for ROM.Findings include: R21's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated moderately impaired cognition, no rejection of care, utilized a wheelchair, independent with eating, setup or clean-up assistance with oral hygiene, dependent with toileting hygiene, sit to lying, chair to bed transfer, toilet transfer, lower body dressing, substantial/maximal assistance with shower/bathe self, roll left and right, upper body dressing, and partial moderate assistance with personal hygiene; limitation range of motion on both sides of lower extremity and no impairment on upper extremity; diagnoses included non-Alzheimer's dementia, depression, Parkinsonism and not receiving a restorative nursing program.R21's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated moderately impaired cognition, no rejection…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan for diabetic management that included goals and individualized interventions was developed or 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for care plans.Findings include:R2's face sheet dated 2/27/26, identified diagnoses of type 2 diabetes with hyperglycemia.R2's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R2 had no cognitive deficits, was on a therapeutic diet, and took hypoglycemic medications (used to lower blood glucose).R2's medication administration record (MAR) for January 2026, identified an order from 9/12/24, that was for a FreeStyle Libre 2 Sensor continuous blood glucose monitoring system sensor to be applied every 14 days.R2's care plan current at the time of survey included R2's diagnosis of diabetes as a related factor of the focus which included (but not limited to) falls, vulnerable adult, nutrition, skin integrity, however, R2's care plan did not include diabetic focus that identified…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-03 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff implemented proper peri care techniques, including use of Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP), appropriate glove changes, and hand hygiene, to prevent or mitigate the risk of urinary tract infections for 2 of 2 residents (R2, R4) reviewed for peri care.Findings include:Findings include:R2's face sheet dated 2/27/26, identified diagnoses of cystitis without hematuria (bladder infection commonly caused by Escherichia coli (commonly entered into the urinary tract through contamination of feces), neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder (nerve damage impairs bladder control), and personal history of urinary tract infections (UTI).R2's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R2 had no cognitive deficits, dependent on staff for toileting needs, resident had a urinary catheter with occasional bowel incontinence.R2's care plan dated 4/19/24, identified Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) related to indwelling foley…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-16 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure professional standards of practice were followed during administration of eye drops for 3 of 3 residents (R12, R15, R106) observed for medication administration. Findings include: R12's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated R12 was cognitively intact, no rejection of care, required, maximal assistance with personal hygiene, and diagnoses included progressive neurological conditions, hemiplegia or hemiparesis (weakness or partial paralysis on one side of the body), and multiple sclerosis (central nervous system autoimmune condition. Damage to myelin causes symptoms like muscle weakness and vision changes) . R12's care plan dated on 4/1/25, did not indicate any care needs related to her eyes. R12's medication review report printed 4/15/25, indicated Artificial Tears Ophthalmic Solution 1-0.3% (Propylene Glycol-Glycerin) instill one drop in left eye three times a day for dry eye and instill two drop in right…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$41,357 in federal fines across 3 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $32,183 — penalty dated 2023-10-27
• $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-08-28
• $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-08-21
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-11-28 for 20 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MONARCH HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT — 45 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MN