The Emeralds At Grand Rapids LLC
2801 South Highway 169, Grand Rapids, MN 55744 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 93 certified beds · (218) 326-3431 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 3 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (50) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $65,900 in federal fines (most recent 2026-06-04)
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 6.8% | 18.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.4% | 4.1% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 1.9% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.1% | 2.6% | 2.0% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 3.3% | 4.1% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.8% | 4.0% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 17.4% | 12.5% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 96.1% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 9.1% | 5.2% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 14.3% | 24.5% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 13.8% | 17.1% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.9% | 1.9% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 71.6% | 82.7% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 26.8% | 23.5% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 30.9% | 14.8% | 12.0% | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
44.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 43 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 56.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 30 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 33% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 44.6%CMS range 30.6–57.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.3%CMS range 6.8–14.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 56.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 50.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 43.3% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 92.6% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 69.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.9% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.9% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.1%CMS range 2.9–12.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.81 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 93 beds and averages 45.3 residents a day — about 49% occupied, or roughly 48 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.47 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.95 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.03 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.20 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.58 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.06 to 0.68 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
50 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 36 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-06-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and document review the facility failed to reduce the risk of falls for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed when R1 was care planned to use two staff for transfers with a mechanical lift and nursing assistant (NA)-A attempted a mechanical lift transfer with one staff, R1 fell from the sling onto the floor sustaining a left femur fracture, head laceration and injury to left toes. The immediate jeopardy began on [DATE] when NA-A attempted a mechanical lift transfer with one staff, R1 fell from the sling onto the floor sustaining a left femur fracture, head laceration, and injury to left toes. R1 was care planned to use two staff for transfers with a mechanical lift and was identified on [DATE]. The administrator and director of nursing (DON) were notified of the IJ on [DATE] at 2:48 p.m. The immediate jeopardy was removed on [DATE] when the facility provided staff education and lift inspections, and the deficient practice corrected on [DATE], prior to the start of the survey and was therefore Past…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-03-22 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to provide the physician ordered textured diet for 1 of 3 residents (R1) who subsequently choked and required the Heimlich Maneuver. This was an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) for R1 who required hospitalization following the choking incident where she was determined to have aspirated and required mechanically assisted ventilation. The IJ began on 3/9/24, at approximately 6:30 p.m. when R1 was found by nursing assistant (NA)-A in the common area of the unit observed as pale, lips blue and unable to speak. R1 was administered the Heimlich Maneuver, suction and was sent to the hospital where she subsequently required mechanically assisted ventilation. The IJ was identified on 3/22/24, and the administrator was notified of the IJ on 3/22/24, at 1:00 p.m. The immediate jeopardy was removed on 3/13/24, and the deficient practice was corrected prior to the start of the survey and was therefore issued at past noncompliance. R1's admission Record indicated she admitted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-10-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to maintain resident safety when a resident (R1) who was assessed to be at risk for elopement verbalized his intent to leave the facility, left without staff knowledge and was returned to the facility by two strangers. Further, R1 was allowed to discharge home against medical advice from the facility even though he had been assessed to have cognitive impairment and admitted due to recurrent falls. This resulted in an immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation for R1. The IJ began on 9/30/23, when R1 left the facility without staff knowledge. R1 was found by two strangers on a highly-trafficked four lane highway with a cut on his nose. Additionally, within two hours of R1' s return to the facility, R1 wanted to return home. The facility did not implement interventions to keep him safe and assisted R1 leave on his own even though the facility assessed him unsafe in the community alone. The administrator and senior nurse consultant (SNC) were notified of the IJ on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to ensure an environment free from hazards. This resulted in actual harm to R1 who sustained a second degree burn when his knee rested against the baseboard heater and he was unable to move his knee or call for help. The deficient practice was corrected prior to the start of the survey and was therefore issued at past noncompliance. Findings include: R1's admission Record indicated he admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis that included encephalopathy (disease in which the functioning of the brain is affected), Diabetes, transient ischemic attack (a short period of symptoms similar to those of a stroke) and a tracheostomy (a direct airway through an incision in the trachea). R1's annual Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], indicated he was rarely/never understood, had upper and lower extremity impairments and was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living. R1's care plan dated 2/2/24, indicated he was non-verbal and unable…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-06-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to keep linen carts covered that were in the communal hallways. The facility also failed to offer hand hygiene to the residents prior to meal service. Lastly the facility failed to identify and investigate a foodborne pathogen that was diagnosed in a resident. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. Findings include: Linen: During an observation on 6/14/26 at 2:05 p.m., the hallway clean linen cart on 300 hallway was not covered. During an observation on 6/15/26 at 9:47 a.m., the 300 hallway extra linen cart was again not covered. the green flap that should cover the cart was flipped all the way backwards and was covered with Kleenex and gloves so the flap could not be flipped forward to a closed and covered position. During an interview on 6/15/26 at 9:50 a.m., nursing assistant (NA)-A stated all carts that hold clean linens for resident use should be covered unless staff are actively at the cart removing items to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-17 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to have a new order and a face-to-face provider visit every 14 days performed prior to renewing an as needed antipsychotic medication. This affected 1 of 5 (R34) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications.Findings include: R34's significant change Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], indicated R34 had significant cognitive impairment. Diagnoses included dementia with agitation and anxiety disorder. R34's care plan dated 3/2/26, indicated an alteration in behavior due to severe dementia with agitation, major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder. Interventions included administer medications as ordered, monitoring for potential side effects. R34's care plan dated 4/3/26, also indicated on hospice cares related to Alzheimer's dementia with interventions that included medications as needed. R34's Order Summary Report dated 5/5/26 through 6/17/26, indicated an order for Olanzapine (antipsychotic medication) 2.5 milligrams (mg) by mouth every 6 hours (hr)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure the use of thromboembolism-deterrent stockings (TEDs) as ordered for edema care. This affected 1 of 1 (R45) resident reviewed for edema.Findings include:R45's 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R45 was moderately cognitively impaired. Diagnoses included left lower leg closed fracture, hypertension, and arthritis.R45's provider orders dated 6/10/26, included TEDs stockings right leg on in a.m., off in p.m. every morning and at bedtime.R45's care plan reviewed 6/15/26, did not include right pedal edema or the prescribed intervention of TEDs.R45's treatment administration record (TAR) dated 6/2026, included TEDs stockings to right leg on in a.m., off in p.m. every morning and at bedtime, start date 6/10/26.During an observation on 6/14/26 at 3:31 p.m., R45 was sitting in bed with legs elevated, right foot noted to be edematous with no TEDs stocking. R45 stated they were concerned about their swollen right foot, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-17 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to provide monitoring to a dialysis site following a dialysis treatment for 1 of 1 resident (R9) reviewed for dialysis care.Findings include:R9's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified intact cognition and diagnoses of end-stage renal failure, and anemia in chronic kidney disease. The MDS also reflected R9 had dialysis treatments while a resident.R9's provider orders dated 8/27/25, identified to offer rest and a snack after dialysis, to take and record vital signs after dialysis, to monitor fistula (a surgically created connection between an artery and a vein to provide access for dialysis treatment) for bruit (a whooshing sound heard with a stethoscope) and thrill (a powerful pulse felt at the top of the fistula) every shift and to notify provider if these were not found, and to monitor dialysis site every shift for bleeding and to call 911 if bleeding was noted.R9's care plan dated 9/25/24, identified a focus statement…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-19 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure controlled substances were accurately reconciled to prevent loss and diversion for 6 of 6 residents (R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6,) reviewed for narcotic diversion. A report to the State Agency (SA) dated 11/25/25, indicated a police report identified medications were found in possession of a former employee of the facility. The report identified the following medications and empty packages.Prescribed to R1:Hydrocodone/acetaminophen 5 milligrams (mg) -325mg, total prescribed 18.Prescribed to R2:Clonazepam 0.5 mg empty, total prescribed 29.Prescribed to R3:Gabapentin 100 mg, containing 4 tablets, total prescribed 30.Prescribed to R4:Lorazepam 1mg, total prescribed 30.Prescribed to R5:Oxycodone 5 mg empty, total prescribed 28.Oxycodone 5 mg empty, total prescribed 8.Prescribed to R6:Morphine 5 mg containing 11 tablets, total prescribed 30 of 60.Morphine 5 mg containing 19 tablets, total prescribed 30 of 60.Gabapentin 600 mg, containing 1 tablet, total prescribed 30 of 90.Lorazepam 0.5 mg empty, total prescribed 30 of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and document review the facility failed to notify the provider as ordered for a weight increase of 3 pounds (lb.) or more in 24 hours for 1of 2 residents (R27). The facility also failed to follow fluid restrictions as ordered for 2 of 2 residents (R27, R28). The facility also failed to address elevated blood glucose levels for 1 of 1 resident (R16). The facility also failed to have a resident assessed for usage of a walker for 1 of 1 resident (R12) reviewed for provider orders. Findings include: R27: R27's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated intact cognition. Diagnoses included anemia, coronary artery disease and renal failure. R27's care plan dated 9/25/24, indicated a risk for complications related to dialysis. Interventions included fluid restriction per order. R27's Order Summary Report (OSR) dated 2/4/25, indicated R27 was on an IDDSI level 7 regular texture diet with a 1500 milliliter (ml) fluid restriction. R27's OSR as indicated on 12/7/24 R27 was placed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to maintain proper food storage temperature in a unit refrigerator containing resident food. Furthermore, the facility failed to ensure refrigerated food items were properly labeled and dated. This deficient practices had the potential to affect all residents and visitors using unit refigerators to store food. Findings include: During observation on 3/26/25 at 10:41 a.m., unit refrigerator on wing 3 was reviewed. Refrigerator temperature read 50 degrees on both thermometers inside fridge. The following items were found: -french onion dip container with expiration date of November 11, 2024. -package of sliced cheese labeled with resident name without opened on date. -package of sliced deli meat labeled with resident name without opened on date. -large bottle of pedialyte beverage labelled with open date of 11/25/24 and name of resident that discharged in December of 2024. During followup observation on 3/26/25 at 3:32 p.m., unit refrigerator on wing 3 was reviewed. Refrigerator temperature read 50 degrees on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure nebulizer equipment was properly washed, dried and stored for 2 of 2 residents (R29, R14); that equipment for tube feeding tube flushes was properly dated, rinsed, dried and stored for 1 of 1 residents (R16); and the facility failed to ensure proper PICC line cap placement occured for 1 of 1 resident (R200) who were reviewed for infection prevention and control. Findings include: R29: R29's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] indicate R29 was cognitively intact. Diagnoses included anxiety, depression and post-traumatic stress disorder. R29's Medication Admin Audit Report dated 3/27/25, indicated R29 had orders for Ipratopium-albuterol inhalation solution 0.5-2.5mg inhaled 4 times a day. On 3/26/25, a dose had been set up at 11:38 a.m. During an observation on 3/24/25 at 6:40 p.m., a nebulizer cannister was observed full of a liquid substance. During a second observation on 3/26/25 at 12:53 p.m., again a nebulizer cannister was observed full of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review facility failed to perform a self-administration of medication assessment and obtain provider order to have medication left in room for 2 of 2 (R13 and R29) residents reviewed for self-administration of medication. R13's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated R13 had intact cognition. Diagnoses included heart failure, hypertension and renal insufficiency. During an observation of R13's room on 3/24/25 at 3:17 p.m., a box with a tube of diclofenac cream was noted on the shelf to the right of the bed. During an interview on 3/24/25 at 3:17 p.m., R13 stated the staff utilize the diclofenac cream on her back and just leave it on the shelf so it would be available when they needed it. During a second observation of R13's room on 3/25/25 at 2:06 p.m., a box with a tube of diclofenac cream was again noted on the shelf to the right of the bed. R29's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], indicated R29 was cognitively intact. Diagnoses included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure advanced directives for emergency care and treatment were accurately reflected in all areas of the medical chart to ensure resident wishes would be implemented correctly in an emergent situation for 1 of 16 residents (R200) reviewed for advanced directives. Findings include: R200's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R200 was cognitively intact with the diagnoses of congestive heart failure, diabetes, and respiratory failure. R200's careplan initiated on [DATE], included the focus area Current Code Status: see current POLST [Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment]. Interventions included review advanced directives per resident and or family request and arrange for MD consult as necessary. During record review on [DATE] at 4:48 p.m., R200's scanned in POLST dated [DATE], signed by the provider on [DATE], directed do not resuscitate (DNR). However, the order entered in the chart on [DATE], was for Cardiopulmonary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 36 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to provide the Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNFABN; CMS-10055) to 1 of 3 residents (R54) reviewed whose Medicare Part A coverage ended while in the facility. Findings included: R54's Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (CMS-10123) dated 10/15/24, indicated R54's last day of skilled services was on 10/15/24 due to going on hospice services. The form was signed by R54 and dated 10/15/24. In addition, R54's medical record lacked evidence the required CMS-10055 had been reviewed and/or provided to R54 prior to their Medicare Part A coverage ending. R54's Census List indicated a payer change occurred on 10/16/24, to hospice private pay. R54's progress notes from 10/9/24 to 10/17/24, indicated R54 was a resident of the facility until discharge on [DATE]. During an interview on 3/27/25 at 8:01 a.m., the business office manager (BOM) stated she was responsible to give the residents the CMS 10123 and 10055 forms to the residents 3 days prior…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to perform prescribed dressing changes to a pressure ulcer as ordered for 1 of 3 residents (R27) reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings include: R27's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated intact cognition. Diagnoses included anemia, coronary artery disease and renal failure. R27 was at risk for pressure ulcers and had an unhealed unstageable pressure ulcer. R27's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated 3/25, indicated orders were present from 3/7/25 to 3/20/25 to cleanse pressure ulcer with vashe. Loosely fill wound with vashe damped packing strip, ensure filling in tunnel and undermining. Leave out tail for easy removal. Cover with bordered foam dressing. Change twice daily and as needed. R27's MAR dated 3/25 lacked documentation dressing changes were completed on the following days: - Day shift 3/9/25, 3/13/25, 3/14/25, 3/16/25 through 3/18/25, and 3/20/25 - Evening shift 3/8/25 through 3/10/25, 3/14/25 through 3/16/25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to consistently monitor dialysis access site for 1 of 1 resident (R27) reviewed for dialysis care. Findings include: R27's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated intact cognition. Diagnoses included anemia, end stage renal disease and diabetes. The MDS indicated R27 was on dialysis. R27's care plan dated 9/25/24, indicated R27 had a dialysis port to the right chest. The care plan lacked information related to R27's arteriovenous dialysis fistula in the right arm. R27's Order Summary report dated 2/6/24, indicated orders which included dialysis-monitor chest port post dialysis, dialysis-no IV. Blood draws, blood pressures on right arm. Fistula incision care and monitor dialysis site for bleeding. The order summary lacked to monitor the fistula bruit and thrill (swish sound coming from fistula indicating normal function) from fistula. Provider progress note dated 2/18/25, indicated R27 had right upper extremity fistula placed for dialysis on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure licensed staff were educated and competent in the administration of intravenous medications (IV) and/or the management and care of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) [a long thin tube inserted into a vein on the inside of the upper arm that extends into a larger vein leading to the heart for medication, blood, and nutrition administration] for 1 of 1 residents (R200) reviewed for PICC line care and management. This deficient practice had the potential to impact all residents at the facility who had IV/PICC access and/or received medications through IV/PICC access. Findings include: R200's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R200 was cognitively intact with the diagnoses of congestive heart failure, diabetes, and respiratory failure. R200's careplan initiated on 2/18/25, did not include R200's PICC line nor did it include goals and interventions for care of R200's PICC line. The Order Summary Current…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to make sure pharmacy recommendations were addressed timely for 2 of 5 residents (R28, R33) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include R28's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified intact cognition, and diagnoses included heart failure, hypertension, and renal failure. R28's order summary report dated 12/12/24, indicated R28 was started on Quetiapine Fumarate oral tablet 25 milligrams (mg) one time daily by mouth for a diagnosis of other specified anxiety disorders. R28's Consultant Pharmacist Medication Regimen (PMR) Review dated 2/13/25, recommended the facility address the diagnosis for Quetiapine Fumarate. The PMR indicated CMS guidance for antipsychotic utilization in nursing facilities required an FDA approved diagnosis in chart to use the medication which other specified anxiety was not. The form had not been addressed or signed as completed. During interview on 3/27/25 at 10:43 a.m., the consultant pharmacist (CP)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to have an appropriate diagnosis for use of medication for 1 of 5 residents (R28) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include R28's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified intact cognition, and diagnoses included heart failure, hypertension, renal failure and post kidney transplant. R28's order summary report dated 12/12/24, indicated R28 was on Tacrolimus Oral 1mg capsule, take one by mouth every 12 hours for health maintenance. During interview on 3/27/25 at 10:43 a.m., the consultant pharmacist (CP) stated medications appropriate for a diagnoses of health maintenance included several different vitamins and minerals that a resident took as a preventative or maintenance dosing program. The CP stated Tacrolimus was an antirejection drug for patients who have received a transplant. The CP reviewed R28's chart and indicated R28 had a history of post kidney transplant and post kidney transplant would have been the appropriate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to have an appropriate diagnosis for use of an antipsychotic for 1 of 5 residents (R28) reviewed for unnecessary medications. In addition, the facility failed to complete orthostatic blood pressure (series of blood pressures taken while lying, sitting, and standing) monitoring for an antipsychotic medication for 1 of 1 residents (R33). Findings include R28's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified intact cognition, and diagnoses included heart failure, hypertension, and renal failure. R28's order summary report dated 12/12/24, indicated R28 was started on Quetiapine Fumarate oral tablet 25 milligrams (mg) one time daily by mouth for a diagnosis of other specified anxiety disorders. R28's Consultant Pharmacist Medication Regimen (PMR) Review dated 2/13/25, recommended the facility address the diagnosis for Quetiapine Fumarate. The PMR indicated CMS guidance for antipsychotic utilization in nursing facilities required an FDA approved…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure medications were properly labeled with direction for use for 1 of 1 resident (R13). Findings include: R13's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated R13 had intact cognition. Diagnoses included heart failure, hypertension, and renal insufficiency. R13's Order Summary Report dated 3/29/24, indicated R13 had ordered Diclofenac sodium topical gel, apply 2gms topically to shoulders, upper and mid back 4 times a day. During an observation of R13's room on 3/24/25 at 3:17 p.m., a box with a tube of diclofenac cream was noted on the shelf to the right of the bed. The box and the tube lacked any kind of label with resident name, medication dosage or times to administer. During an interview on 3/24/25 at 3:17 p.m., R13 stated the staff utilize the diclofenac cream on her back and just leave it on the shelf so it would be available when they needed it. During a second observation of R13's room on 3/25/25 at 2:06…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and documentation review the facility failed to properly provide maintenance to maintain bed wheel locks to prevent bed from moving during transfers for 1 of 3 residents (R2) resident reviewed for falls. Findings include: User-Service Manual for Joern's Bed Frames Easy-Care Bed dated 2020, identified to keep bed from rolling in the lowest position, press down on the locking lever to lock casters. The standard caster set comes with two locking casters placed at opposing corners of bed. Possible injury: before leaving the bed unattended, check that the lock feature was in locked position. Never leave an unlocked bed unattended. The Easy-Care Bed contained various parts that wear from normal use. R2's Fall Review Evaluation dated 10/2/24, identified at risk for falls. R2's displayed agitated behavior (verbally/physically abusive, socially inappropriate such as screams, disrobes, and self-abusive), unable to walk even when assisted by staff, and required hands-on assistance to move…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders to obtain a Basic Metabolic Panel (BMP), and Urine Analysis (UA)/Urine Culture (UC) with susceptibility and sensitivity, timely for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed, who was diagnosed with a urinary tract infection (UTI) Findings include: R1's significant change Minimal Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1 had diagnoses which included vascular dementia, anxiety and R1 had severely impaired cognition. R1's progress note dated 6/3/24, revealed R1 was evaluated by the physician related to nursing requested resident to be seen regarding her agitation, behaviors, and multiple falls. Resident had fallen 7 times since her admission. Resident is disoriented to place and time. Physician discussed with family who stated resident smelt like urine and her room smelled of strong urine. Further, family reported resident frequently would get a urinary tract infection (UTI) and exhibited behaviors and more confusion when she had a UTI. New…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed, who was cognitively impaired and able to leave the building without staff's knowledge into the courtyard which resulted in a fall and being able to exit the secured area. In addition, the facility failed to implement fall interventions for 1 of 3 residents (R1), who was at high risk for falls. Findings include: R1's significant change Minimal Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1 had diagnoses which included vascular dementia, anxiety and R1 had severely impaired cognition. Further, MDS indicated R1 had two or more falls with no injury and one fall with injury. R1's care plan as of 6/18/24, indicated R1 had an alteration in cognition related to dementia and R1's daughter assists with decision making. R1 had a history of consistent wandering, pacing, agitation, restlessness/anxiousness, hallucinations, and history of eloping the facility. Due to these behaviors, R1 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-05 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure discharge summary requirements were met, which included a recapitulation of resident's stay (a concise summary of the resident's stay and course of treatment in the facility) and a final summary of the resident's status at discharge, as well as communicating resident's condition upon discharge with receiving the facility for 1 of 1 residents (R1) reviewed. Findings include: R1's discharge Minimal Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1 had diagnoses which included encounter for orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation, and type 2 diabetes. Further MDS identified R1 had two or more falls with no injury and one fall with injury since previous assessment. Review of R1's Progress Notes revealed the following: -On 3/15/24, R1 was in bed and self-transferred to wheelchair. R1 did not press call light for assistance. R1 hit her head on the base of the table stand causing a 2 cm laceration to right forehead. R1 required first aid including…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure injuries following a fall were monitored for healing for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed. Findings include: R1's discharge Minimal Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1 had diagnoses which included encounter for orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation, and type 2 diabetes. Further MDS identified R1 had two or more falls with no injury and one fall with injury since previous assessment. R1's Incident Review and Analysis dated 3/18/24, indicated R1 was found on floor on 3/15/24, after R1 had attempted to stand up from bed and fell forward. R1 had hit left forehead on the metal part of the bedside table causing bleeding and a 2-centimeter (cm) laceration. R1 had a new right below the knee amputation and thought she could stand independently. Review of R1's Progress Notes revealed the following: -On 3/15/24, R1 was in bed and self-transferred to wheelchair. R1 did not press call light for assistance. R1 hit her head on the base of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-22 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 residents (R1) was re-assessed for supervision with eating following a diet change order. Findings include: R1's admission Record indicated she admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis that included dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified severe cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated R1 required supervision or touching assistance to eat and identified a mechanically altered diet. R1's care plan updated 1/17/24, indicated Diet: mechanical soft diet, nectar thick liquids, no straws. Per speech therapy close supervision at meals. Remind R1 to clear between cheek/lip and teeth with tongue. R1 demonstrated good tongue range but low motivation/awareness to clear on her own. R1's care plan was updated to resolved on 3/20/24, following surveyor inquiry. R1's Speech Therapy SLP (Speech and language pathologists) Evaluation and Plan of Treatment dated 12/22/23, identified a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-11 · tag F0572 — patternGive residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the resident [NAME] of Rights were provided in writing and ongoing for residents of the facility for 5 of 5 residents (R7, R15, R26, R43, R50) interviewed during resident meeting. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 54 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: R7 quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R7 had no cognitive impairment. R15 admission MDS dated [DATE], identified R15 had no cognitive impairment. R26 admission MDS dated [DATE], identified R26 had no cognitive impairment. R43 significant change MDS dated [DATE], identified R43 had no cognitive impairment. R50 significant change MDS dated [DATE], identified R50 was cognitively intact. On 1/9/24 at 10:02 am, R7, R15, R26, R43, and R50 stated they knew what the Residents' [NAME] of Rights was and on admit was told to read the rights but was not provided a copy. On 01/09/24 04:29 p.m., the social services designee (SDD) stated admission…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-11 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to have a process to assess, offer and provide the most recent Centers for Disease Control (CDC) education regarding the potential risks and benefits of the pneumococcal vaccine for 4 of 5 residents (R7, R13, R14, R24) reviewed for immunizations. This had the potential to affect all residents who were eligible for the pneumococcal booster. Findings include: R7's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R7 was [AGE] years old and had diagnoses of type 2 diabetes mellitus and heart failure. R7's immunization record undated, identified R7 received the pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23) on 6/10/14, and received the pneumococcal conjugated vaccine (PCV-13) on 11/22/16. R7's medical record did not include evidence R7 or R7's representative received education regarding pneumococcal vaccine booster and there was no indication R7 was offered the pneumococcal vaccine per CDC guidance. R13's admission MDS dated [DATE], identified R13 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-11 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure preventative maintenance and weight calibration was conducted on three scales. This had the opportunity to affect 29 residents at the facility who are routinely weighed with these scales. Findings include: On 1/9/24 at 3:20 p.m., the director of maintenance (DOM) stated there was no scheduled preventative maintenance or scheduled weight calibration for the three wheelchair scales in the facility. The DOM stated there were no records of weight calibration conducted on the scales. The DOM stated the importance of accurate weights was residents' care and well-being. On 1/10/24 at 9:41 a.m., licensed practical nurse (LPN)-A stated the maintenance department conducts preventative maintenance on the wheelchair scales on a regular basis. On 1/10/24 at 11:35 a.m., a Detecto scale technical support representative stated preventative maintenance and weight calibration should be conducted according to the Detecto preventative maintenance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure clothing (other than a hospital type gown) was offered or provided for 1 of 3 residents (R205) reviewed for dignity. In addition, the facility failed to ensure bathing was offered or provided for 1 of 3 residents (R5) reviewed for dignity. The facility also failed to ensure a Medicare notification of non-coverage for therapy was delivered in a private and dignified manor for 1 of 3 residents (R42) reviewed for resident rights. Findings include: R205: R205's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R205 had moderate cognition, exhibited no rejection of care, and required assistance with ADL's including dressing, bed mobility, wheelchair locomotion and transfers. R205's diagnoses included right femur fracture and left tibia fracture. R205's care plan dated 1/4/24, identified a self-care deficit related to weakness. Interventions included assistance with ADL's including personal hygiene, dressing, and locomotion.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure self-administration of medications were assessed for safety and care planned accordingly to reduce the risk of an adverse event for 1 of 1 residents R31 reviewed for self-administration of medication. Findings include: R31's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R31 had diagnoses of chronic respiratory failure (an absence of enough oxygen in the tissues to sustain bodily functions), dependence on respirator, right heart failure (chronic condition in which the heart doesn't pump blood as well as it should), morbid obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension and had a tracheostomy (an opening in the trachea [windpipe] from the outside to allow air and oxygen to reach the lungs). In addition, R31's MDS identified R31 was cognitively intact. R31's current physician order report undated, identified an order for miconazole nitrate powder 2% apply to itching or other topically as needed. Self-Administration of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 resident (R23) had access to their call light. Findings include: R23's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R23 had severe cognitive impairment with the diagnoses of heart failure, end stage renal disease, and dementia. R23's care plan intervention dated 12/6/23, listed under fall risk, instructed staff to place call light within reach when in bed. During an observation on 1/7/24 at 2:51 p.m., R23 was in their room seated in a recliner. R23's call light was out of reach on the floor between the night stand and bed. During an observation on 1/8/24 at 4:09 p.m., R23 was in bed. The call light was on top of R23's bed covers. During an observation on 1/9/24 at 8:06 a.m., R23 was in their room in a recliner. R23's call light was out of reach on the floor between R23's bed and nightstand. Licensed practical nurse (LPN)-A entered R23's room, placed a clothing cover up on R23 for breakfast, and then left the room without…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to correctly code Minimum Data Set (MDS) Section L. Oral/Dental Status to ensure dental issues were addressed in the plan of care for 1 of 1 resident (R12) reviewed for MDS accuracy. Findings include: R12's significant change MDS dated [DATE], identified R12 was cognitively intact with diagnoses of end stage renal disease and diabetes. R12's admission MDS dated [DATE], and significant change MDS dated [DATE], Section L. Oral /Dental Status both indicated R12 did not have any broken, cracked, or chipped teeth, dental pain, or other dental abnormalities. R12's undated, care plan did not include dental concerns or dental interventions related to R12's impaired dental status. The Teeth/Dentures section of R12's admission record dated 9/19/23, indicated R12 had their own teeth with no dentures or partials. The dental section did not identify broken teeth, any dental issues, nor was the unable to assess option selected to indicate R12's teeth…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to provide quarterly care conferences for 1 of 4 residents (R17) reviewed for care planning. Findings include: R17's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated R17 was cognitively intact. Diagnoses included depression, psychotic disorder, and schizophrenia. Review of R17's care conference forms and progress notes identified care conferences were held on 11/8/23, and 2/3/23. There was no other documentation of care conferences for R17. On 1/4/24 at 2:46 p.m., R17 stated there had not been a care conference in 2023, other than 11/23, and possibly a second one but she could not recall the date. During an interview on 1/9/24 at 11:26 a.m., licensed practical nurse (LPN)-A stated care conferences were held every quarter while the resident was in the facility. The care conference was needed to discuss the treatment plan for the resident and to ensure the resident's wishes were taken into account when updating the plan of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure routine bathing was offered or provided to promote good hygiene for 1 of 5 residents (R5) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs) and who was dependent on staff for their cares. Findings include: R5's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R5 was cognitively intact, demonstrated no rejection of care behaviors, and required substantial assistance with ADL's including showering/bathing, and transfers. R5's care plan, revision date 12/21/23, identified R5 would be dressed, groomed, and bathed per facility policy and would accept assistance with self cares. The plan identified R5 required assistance with personal hygiene, showering/bathing and transfers. However, the plan lacked any evidence for when or how (i.e., frequency, type) R5's bathing would be completed; nor did the plan outline any refusal of care behaviors. On 1/7/23 at 2:27 p.m., R5 stated she was scheduled for baths twice weekly on Tuesday and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to appropriately position 1 of 3 residents (R24) reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings include: R24's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R24 had diagnoses that included enterocolitis due to Clostridium difficile (C. diff), quadriplegia (severe form of paralysis that affects all four limbs and the torso), acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (an absence of enough oxygen in the tissues to sustain bodily functions), chronic heart failure (condition in which the heart doesn't pump blood as well as it should), Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection, and had a colostomy (opening in the large intestine to facilitate removal of feces from the body). R24's MDS further identified he was cognitively intact, required extensive assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs), and was at risk for pressure ulcers. R24's current physician order report undated, did not include the use of any adaptive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to follow care plan interventions for 1 of 2 residents (R33) reviewed for smoking. Findings include: R33's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R33's diagnoses included spastic quadriplegic cerebral palsy (condition that affects movement and posture), dysphagia (condition with difficulty in swallowing food or liquid), emphysema (lung disease which results in shortness of breath), abnormal involuntary movements, and speech disturbances. In addition, R33's MDS identified him as cognitively intact and required total staff assistance for all activities of daily living (ADLs). R33's care plan dated 10/18/23, identified R33 was at risk for accidents related to safe smoking and required extensive staff assistance to smoke. R33's interventions included: -wearing a smoking apron -staff directed to assist resident by placing cigarette in resident's mouth using an extension holder -staff to light cigarette -staff to supervise…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure tracheostomy cares were followed for 1 of 1 resident (R31) reviewed for tracheostomy (an opening in the trachea [windpipe] from the outside to allow air and oxygen to reach the lungs) care. In addition, the facility failed to ensure oxygen use parameters were followed and oxygen tubing was changed in a timely manner for 1 of 2 residents (R31) reviewed for respiratory care. Findings include: R31's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R31 had diagnoses which included chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (an absence of enough oxygen in the tissues to sustain bodily functions), dependence on respirator (ventilator) status, diabetes mellitus, and anxiety. R31's MDS also identified he was cognitively intact and he received oxygen therapy, suctioning, tracheostomy care, and non-invasive mechanical ventilator. R31's care plan dated 12/56/23, identified R31 had a tracheostomy with a goal of having no signs or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure dialysis assessments and treatments were completed as ordered and documented per policy for 2 of 2 residents (R43 and R12) reviewed for dialysis care. Findings include: R43: R43's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R43 was cognitively intact, and diagnoses included diabetes and end stage renal disease. R43 currently received dialysis. R43's care plan dated 1/11/24, informed staff R43 was at risk for complications related to dialysis and the interventions instructed staff to call 911 for uncontrolled bleeding, and provide treatment and dressing per protocol. R43's Order Summary dated 1/11/24, included the following orders: modified renal diet, check blood glucose before meals, complete dialysis communication Tuesday, Wednesday, and Saturday (Tue-Thu-Sat), dialysis Tue-Thu-Sat remember to send a snack, daily weight, dialysis vital signs one time a day after dialysis, and monitor dialysis site for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the consultant pharmacist recommendations were addressed for 1 of 5 residents (R31) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: R31's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R31's diagnoses included type 2 diabetes mellitus, anxiety disorder, morbid obesity. R31 had intact cognition, independent with most activities of daily living (ADLs) needed assistance with toileting hygiene. R31's care plan dated 12/7/23, directed staff to monitor for skin breakdown for signs/symptoms of infection. Report signs/symptoms to medical doctor (MD). Care plan further directed staff to document on skin condition and keep MD informed of changes. R31's Order Listing Report identified the following: 10/25/23, miconazole nitrate powder 2% (medication for itching) apply to itching or other topically as needed for stasis dermatitis (condition of skin changes due to insufficient blood return). A Consultant Pharmacist Communication to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were dated when opened in 3 of 3 med carts reviewed for medication storage. This had the opportunity to affect five residents (R51, R46, R14, R35, R6). Findings include: During an observation on 1/11/24 at 11:10a.m., of the wing 100 medication cart revealed R51's Timolol eye drops were opened without being labeled with the date opened. During an observation on 1/11/23 at 11:18 a.m., of the wing 300 medication cart revealed R46's Derm Otic Oil (ear drops) were opened without being labeled with the date opened. R14's inhaler was opened without being labeled with the date it was opened. During an observation on 1/11/24 at 11:27a.m., of the wing 200 medication cart revealed R35's Incruse Ellipta inhaler and R6's Refresh eye drops were labeled without being labeled with the date they were opened. During an interview on 1/11/24 at 11:32 a.m., the director of nursing (DON) stated medications should be labeled with the date they were opened to ensure the medication is safe and effective for the residents. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolatedProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and document review, the facility failed to coordinate necessary dental services for 1 of 1 resident (R12) reviewed for dental services. Findings include: R12's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R12 was cognitively intact with diagnoses of end stage renal disease and diabetes. Section GG0130. Self-Care letter I. indicated R12 required assistance to perform oral hygiene. R12's admission MDS dated [DATE], and significant change MDS dated [DATE], Section L. Oral /Dental Status both indicated R12 did not have any broken, cracked, or chipped teeth, dental pain, or other dental abnormalities. R12's undated, care plan focus areas identified potential for altered nutrition and self-care deficit related to weakness, but did not include dental concerns or dental interventions related to R12's impaired dental status. During an interview on 1/7/24 at 7:24 p.m., it was noted that R12 was missing several teeth in the front of his mouth. R12 stated they had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene and glove use practices were maintained for 1 of 3 residents (R24) observed during wound care. Findings include: R24's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R24's diagnoses included enterocolitis due to clostridium difficile (inflammation of the colon caused by bacteria Clostridium difficile, it can cause severe damage to the colon and can even be fatal), depression, colostomy status (an opening from the colon or large intestine through the abdomen), and quadriplegia (paralysis that affects all a person's limbs and body from the neck down). In addition, R24's MDS identified R24 was cognitively intact and required assistance with activities of daily living. R24's MDS further identified he was at risk for pressure ulcers and had one stage two, three stage four, and one unstageable pressure ulcer(s). R24's care plan dated 12/19/23, identified R24 had a current infection extended-spectrum…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-01 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to protect facility residents from potential abuse when they allowed an alleged perpetrator (AP) (licensed practical nurse (LPN)-A) to work after an allegation of misappropriation of resident property (drug diversion). This had the potential to affect all seven residents who resided on Wing 3, who were ordered opioid (narcotic/pain) medication(s). Findings include: A facility reported incident (FRI), submitted 11/16/23 at 5:49 p.m., identified an incident occurred on 11/15/23 at 2:00 a.m. R1 reported to staff when LPN-A administered him his 2:00 a.m. oxycodone (opioid) medication the pill lacked an overall taste (not the normal bitter taste), and he experienced increased pain on those nights. R1 indicated similar incidents were present for 'awhile,' but he was unable to provide a direct timeline; however, reported he noticed increased pain over the last couple days. Further, he explained when he received his 2:00 a.m. medications he would sleep a couple…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to report allegations of misappropriation of resident property to the State Agency (SA) within 24 hours of the allegation for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for drug diversion. Findings include: A facility reported incident (FRI), submitted 11/16/23 at 5:49 p.m., identified an incident occurred on 11/15/23 at 2:00 a.m. R1 reported to staff when licensed practical nurse (LPN)-A administered him his 2:00 a.m. oxycodone (opioid) medication the pill lacked an overall taste (not the normal bitter taste), and he experienced increased pain on those nights. R1 indicated similar incidents were present for awhile, but he was unable to provide a direct timeline; however, reported he noticed increased pain over the last couple days. Further, he explained when he received his 2:00 a.m. medications he would sleep a couple hours and wake up in extreme pain. The FRI identified alleged non-fiduciary financial exploitation related to medication theft. R1's Minimum Data…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to report an elopement to state agency (SA) for 1 of 1 residents (R1) who eloped from the facility without staff knowledge. Findings include: R1's admission Record indicated he admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included: Syncope, epilepsy, history of traumatic brain injury (TBI) and repeated falls. R1's Elopement Risk Evaluation dated 9/28/23, identified a habit/history of wandering or attempts to leave the unit or building, pacing or agitated behavior and indicated he was ambulatory. The evaluation indicated R1 was at risk for elopement and identified the use of a WanderGuard. R1's Brief Interview for Mental Status dated 9/30/23, identified a score of six which indicated severe cognitive impairment. R1's facility Progress Note dated 9/30/23, 2:33 p.m. indicated R1 was found on the side of the highway headed south. A younger guy and his female friend brought resident back to the facility. R1 did not have a WanderGuard due to not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an elopement for 1 of 1 residents (R1) who left the facility without staff knowledge and was found by two strangers on the highway. Findings include: R1's admission Record indicated he admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis that included: Syncope, epilepsy, history of traumatic brain injury (TBI) and repeated falls. R1's Elopement Risk Evaluation dated 9/28/23, identified a habit/history of wandering or attempts to leave the unit or building, pacing or agitated behavior and indicated he was ambulatory. The evaluation indicated R1 was at risk for elopement and identified the use of a WanderGuard. R1's Brief Interview for Mental Status dated 9/30/23, identified a score of six which indicated severe cognitive impairment. R1's facility Progress Note dated 9/30/23, 2:33 p.m. indicated R1 was found on the side of the highway headed south. A younger guy and his female friend brought resident back to the facility. R1 did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2026-06-17 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure daily staffing data was posted over the weekend. This deficient practice had the potential to affect any resident, family member, or visitor who wished to view the posting.Findings include: During an observation on 6/14/26 (Sunday) at 1:30 p.m., the facility staffing data sheet was posted in the main entrance. The documented read Day of week: Friday, Today's Date: 6/12/26.During an observation on 6/14/26 at 6:57 p.m., it was noted the 6/12/26 posted staffing data sheet had been taken down and replaced with a staffing data sheet for Sunday, 6/14/26. During an interview on 6/17/26 at 12:36 p.m., The administrator stated staffing sheets should be posted each morning and indicated it was the night staff's responsibility to review, make changes if needed, and then post. The administrator confirmed Saturday and Sunday staffing sheets had not been posted in the morning as expected.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$65,900 in federal fines across 4 penalties.
- $27,378 — penalty dated 2026-06-04
- $14,433 — penalty dated 2024-03-22
- $8,824 — penalty dated 2024-03-07
- $15,265 — penalty dated 2023-10-13
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to MONARCH HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT — 45 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.1 | -1.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 3.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 3.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
The other 44 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.2★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 44; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JCA HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 10% | since 02/01/2019 |
| NIJ LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 10% | since 02/01/2019 |
| SPARTAN HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 30% | since 02/01/2019 |
| WBS HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 20% | since 02/01/2019 |
| YAZOMA HOLDINGS, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 30% | since 02/01/2019 |
| HALPERT, MARC | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | 30% | since 02/01/2019 |
| JAFFA, NOAM | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | 10% | since 02/01/2019 |
| LEGUM, JOSHUA | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE | 30% | since 02/01/2019 |
| STERN, WILLIAM | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | 20% | since 02/01/2019 |
| MONARCH HEALTHCARE OPERATING VIII LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 02/01/2019 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $952K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MN
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Minnesota Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 245495. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.