Hillcrest Health Care, LLC
714 Southbend Avenue, Mankato, MN 56001 · For profit - Corporation · 95 certified beds · (507) 387-3491 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (47) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $17,605 in federal fines (most recent 2025-02-27)
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 14.6% | 18.2% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.6% | 4.1% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.4% | 1.9% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.5% | 2.6% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 8.6% | 4.1% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 6.9% | 4.0% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 24.0% | 20.5% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 25.3% | 12.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 86.2% | 96.1% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.5% | 5.2% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 28.7% | 24.5% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 29.0% | 17.1% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 5.4% | 1.9% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 42.7% | 82.7% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 22.9% | 23.5% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 29.3% | 14.8% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.29 | 1.61 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.32 | 1.90 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
48.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 68 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 48.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 29 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 27% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 48.3%CMS range 36.5–62.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 8.5%CMS range 5.7–12.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 48.3% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 48.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 44.8% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.3% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.6%CMS range 3.7–11.7 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.91 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 95 beds and averages 63.5 residents a day — about 67% occupied, or roughly 32 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.55 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.89 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.03 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.17 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.70 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.97 to 0.69 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
47 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 34 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to identify a change in condition, comprehensively assess weight gain, monitor, and notify the physician for 1 of 1 residents (R1). As a result R1 had a total weight gain of 37 pounds over 13 days that resulted in heart attack, respiratory failure, and death. This resulted in a past non-compliance at an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ). The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) began on [DATE] when R1 had a 7.1 pound (lb.) weight increase that was not reported to the physician nor comprehensively assessed and monitored. The Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) were notified of the IJ on [DATE] at 5:48 p.m. The facility had implemented immediate corrective action on [DATE] to prevent recurrence, the IJ was issued at past non-compliance (PNC). Findings include: R1's face sheet dated [DATE], identified diagnoses of mild intellectual disabilities and lack of expected normal physiological development in childhood (disorder that interferes with brain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to follow the care plan for safe transfers for a full body mechanical lift for 1 of 3 residents (R1) who required lifts for transfers. The facility's failures resulted in harm when R1 fell out of the lift and sustained subgaleal hematoma (bleeding between the skull and the scalp) and head laceration that required three staples. The facility implemented immediate corrective actions prior to survey and is issued at past non-compliance. Findings include: R1's face sheet dated 10/16/24, identified R1 had diagnoses that included traumatic brain injury (head injury causing damage to the brain by external force or mechanism), dementia (deterioration of memory, language, and other thinking abilities), bipolar disorder (serious mental illness characterized by extreme mood swings), and presence of cerebrospinal fluid drainage device (used when the normal flow of cerebrospinal fluid in the brain is obstructed). R1's quarterly (MDS) dated [DATE],…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2022-02-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess and implement interventions to prevent worsening and prevent additional pressure ulcers (PU)'s from developing for 1 of 1 resident (R28) who had two unstageable PU's (Full-thickness skin and tissue loss in which the extent of tissue damage within the ulcer cannot be confirmed because it is obscured by slough or eschar) and one stage 2 PU (partial thickness skin loss of the dermis) This failure resulted in actual harm when R28's pressure ulcers worsened and additional PU's were acquired. Findings include: R28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses (identified on the diagnosis report sheet) dated 1/5/22, including; congestive heart failure (CHF) ( a chronic condition in which the heart does not pump blood as well as it should), fibromyalgia (widespread muscle pain and tenderness) osteoarthritis (when bone protective tissue wears down ), spinal stenosis (narrowing of the spinal canal), history of PU on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-30 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure body pillows used as positioning devices were not implemented as physical restraints for 3 of 3 residents (R5, R10 and R11) reviewed for restraints. Findings include: R5's face sheet dated 6/30/26, identified diagnoses of fracture of the right femur, osteoarthritis, dementia, osteoporosis, and history of falling. R5's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified severe cognitive impairment, had no behaviors, no rejection of care, had impairment on one side of lower extremity, used a walker, used a wheelchair, needed supervision/touching assistance for bed mobility, substantial/maximum assistance for transfers, had a fall in the last month prior to admission, had a fracture related to fall; in the 6 months prior to admission. Had no falls since admission. Had surgical repair of fracture of pelvis, hip, leg, knee, or ankle. R5's Fall incident report dated 5/5/26 at 9:20 a.m., identified R5 has a witnessed fall. Nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to timely report a fall with major injury to the state agency (SA) within the required timeframe for 1 of 1 resident (R5) reviewed for falls. Findings include:R5's face sheet dated 6/30/26, identified diagnoses of fracture of the right femur (thigh bone), osteoarthritis (disorder where the protective cartilage that cushions the bones wears down), dementia, osteoporosis (a bone disease characterized by weak, brittle bones), and history of falling. R5's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified severe cognitive impairment, no behaviors, no rejection of care, had impairment on one side of lower extremity, used a walker/wheelchair, needed supervision/touching assistance for bed mobility, substantial/maximum assistance for transfers, had a fall in the last month prior to admission, had a fracture related to fall; in the 6 months prior to admission. Had no falls since admission. Had surgical repair of fracture of pelvis, hip, leg, knee, or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to complete a comprehensive fall analysis, evaluate and revise the care plan, and failed to implement fall interventions for 2 of 3 residents (R5, R11) who had severe cognitive impairment, impulsivity, and at high risk for falls. Findings include:Findings include: R5's face sheet dated 6/30/26, identified diagnoses of fracture of the right femur (thigh bone), osteoarthritis (disorder where the protective cartilage that cushions the bones wears down), dementia, osteoporosis (a bone disease characterized by weak, brittle bones), and history of falling. R5's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R5 had severe cognitive impairment, no behaviors, no rejection of care, had impairment on one lower extremity, used a walker/wheelchair, needed supervision/touching assistance for bed mobility, substantial/maximum assistance for transfers, had a fall in the last month prior to admission, and had a fracture related to fall 6 months…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-30 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to comprehensively assess and monitor fluid intake to ensure adequate hydration for 1 of 3 residents (R3) reviewed for dehydration. Findings include: R3's face sheet dated 6/26/26, identified diagnoses of malignant neoplasm of brain, type 2 diabetes, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, and absence of right leg below knee. R3's significant change of status Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R3 had no memory issues. R3 had no vision or hearing impairments. R3 rejected cares 1-3 days per week, had impairment on both sides of upper and lower body, was independent with eating, moderate assistance with upper body dressing and dependent on lower body dressing. R3's nutritional care plan updated 5/23/26, identified a goal of maintain adequate hydration status. Interventions included to offer adequate fluids at and between meals beginning 11/28/25 and obtain/review labs per doctor orders. R3's Clinical Nutrition Evaluation V-5 dated 3/4/26, did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to safely store medications by allowing medications to be removed from their original labeled containers, permitting loose and unidentified medications to remain in medication carts, failing to properly label medications after opening, and failing to remove expired medications from active stock on 2 of 2 medication carts observed. Findings include During an observation and interview on 6/25/26 at 4:17 p.m., registered nurse (RN)-A opened the top drawer of the medication cart. Inside the cart there were three white souffle cups filled with medications. RN-A stated she currently had three residents' medications set-up in the top drawer. RN-A put the resident room numbers on the bottom of the souffle cups, so she knew whose medications they were. RN-A stated she always set medications up in the top drawer, so they were ready to distribute if I am really busy at least it is ready for them or me to give it to them. It saves a lot of time for me. During an observation and interview on 6/26/26 at 8:13 a.m., licensed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure proper handwashing/hand hygiene was implemented for 1 of 3 residents (R13) observed during incontinence cares. In addition, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) were utilized during a transfer for 1 of 3 residents (R13).Findings include:R13's face sheet dated 6/30/26, identified diagnoses of diabetes, dementia, chronic kidney disease, and retention of urine.R13's significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R13 had moderate cognitive impairment, had no behaviors, had rejection of cares that occurred 1-3 days, had limitations in range of motion on lower extremity, used a wheelchair, was dependent for toileting hygiene, substantial/maximum assistance for bed mobility, dependent for transfers, and had an indwelling catheter.R13's care plan dated 6/11/26, identified R13 was currently on EBP related to catheter care and wound care. Goal of staff to follow EBP. Interventions added on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a wheelchair in a clean and sanitary manner for 1 of 1 resident (R32) and ensure fans in resident rooms were kept clean for 3 of 3 residents (R2, R52 and R21) reviewed for safe, clean, comfortable, and home-like environment. Findings include:R32's face sheet received on 8/13/25, included diagnosis of Parkinson's disease (a movement disorder of the central nervous system). R32's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated intact cognition. R32 had unclear speech, was usually understood and could understand. R32 required substantial assistance or was dependent upon staff for activities of daily living (ADLs) and did not walk. R32's care plan did not include use of a wheelchair. During an observation on 8/11/25 at 7:18 p.m., while seated in her wheelchair at a table in the great room, observed a heavy grayish/white film over the blue brackets under and alongside R32's wheelchair. The film was hardened onto the brackets and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure an allegation of staff to resident sexual abuse was reported to the State Agency (SA) within two hours for 1 of 1 resident (R1) who reported a male staff member inappropriately touched her. Findings include: R1's face sheet dated 8/28/24, identified R1 had diagnoses of depression, major depressive disorder, social phobia, and anxiety disorder. R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R1 did not have cognitive impairment. R1 required two-person physical assist with dressing and grooming, and required a total mechanical lift and two assist to transfer from one location to another. R1's Vulnerable Adult Maltreatment Report submitted to the State Agency on 8/26/24, identified notification of R1's accusation of sexual assault by a staff member that occurred on 8/25/24. R1 had been at the emergency room earlier in the day for a dislodged catheter after the sexual assault occurred. Facility was instructed to have two…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop a person centered comprehensive care plan was developed for 1 of 3 residents (R1) who requested no male caregivers provide care. Findings include: R1's face sheet dated 8/28/24, identified R1 had an admission date in July 2024 with diagnoses of depression, major depressive disorder, social phobia, and anxiety disorder. R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R1 did not have cognitive impairment. R1 required two-person physical assist with dressing and grooming, and required a total mechanical lift and two assist to transfer from one location to another. During an interview on 8/27/24 at 1:52 p.m., registered nurse (RN)-A stated he completed R1's admission assessments. During that process R1 had brought up the history of sexual abuse; RN-A immediately initiated no male caregivers to provide cares. RN-A explained he did not add the history and R1's preferences to the care plan, did not document in a progress…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespreadImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to implement a process for antibiotic review in order to determine appropriate indications, dosage, duration, trends of antibiotic use and resistance. This had the potential to affect any residents who had infections requiring antibiotic use. Findings include: When interviewed on 6/13/24 at 8:10 a.m., the director of nursing (DON), also identified as infection preventionist, indicated the facility uses McGeer's criteria but staff are not always completing that in the medical record and stated it is a team effort to monitor symptoms between nurse managers and herself. The DON indicated she has been doing infection prevention for the past year and when she started, they didn't even have a tracking form. The DON stated she is using the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) Infection Control Assessment and Response (ICAR) form for documentation for infections and antibiotic use. The interim DON indicated from the ICAR report, she is able to share quarterly data at quality assurance and performance improvement (QAPI) meetings,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 34 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure a mechanical transfer lift was cleaned after resident use for 3 of 3 residents (R9, R45, R26) and that appropriate sanitizer was used to clean the lift observed for infection control practices. Findings Include: R9's Face Sheet printed 6/13/24, included diagnoses of obesity, bipolar disorder, difficulty in walking and unsteadiness on feet. R9's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R9 was dependent on staff for all transfers and required assist of 2 and a lift. During observation on 6/11/24 at 3:36 p.m., nursing assistant (NA)-E and NA-F with the assist of a mechanical lift (device utilized for transfer) transferred R9 from her bed to her wheelchair. NA-F removed the lift from the room and moved it to another hallway and parked it in room [ROOM NUMBER]. NA-F left the room. NA-F confirmed he did not clean the lift and should have. During observation on 6/13/24 at 8:39 a.m., NA-A was observed in R45's room cleaning a hoyer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-13 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure 4 of 5 vents in the 400 hallway, and 5 of 5 vents in 500 hallway were clean when they had a black substance present on the 3 tiered vents. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents, staff, and visitors on the 400 and 500 wings. In addition, the facility failed to ensure resident rooms were maintained in a clean, sanitary manner for 13 of 60 residents (R7, R163, R16, R29, R39, R57, R2, R4, R162, R260, R37, R45, R22) whose rooms and/or bathrooms lacked upkeep, and who were reviewed for environment. Findings include: Hallway Vents During an observation on 6/10/24 at 3:29 p.m., the 500 unit hallway was observed to have five vents that had a black substance present on the rungs of the 3 tired vents. The maintenance director (MD)-A indicated it appears like dust buildup and the vents need to be taken down and cleaned. MD-A added it likely due to moisture after starting the air conditioning units causing the dirt to stick. MD-A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 resident (R16) who was observed to have medications in his room, had been appropriately assessed and deemed safe to self-administer medications. Findings include: R16's facesheet printed on 6/13/24, indicated history of a stroke. R16's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated severe cognitive impairment, clear speech, could usually understand and be understood. R16 was dependent upon staff for activities of daily living. R16's physician orders included: 1. Calcipotriene external ointment 0.005 %, apply to affected area on right leg topically two times a day every Saturday and Sunday for psoriasis, dated 10/25/23. 2. Aspercreme arthritis pain external gel 1 % (diclofenac sodium topical), apply to left hand and finger joints topically every morning and at bedtime for contracture pain, dated 4/18/24. 3. Systane solution 0.4-0.3 %; instill 1 drop in both eyes every morning and at bedtime for dry eyes,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to update the care plan and the [NAME] with behavioral interventions for 1 of 1 resident (R39) reviewed for care plans. Findings include: R39's facesheet printed on 6/13/24, included diagnoses of metabolic encephalopathy (a chemical imbalance in the brain which can lead to personality changes), bilateral below the knee amputations, and depression. R39's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated R39 was cognitively intact, had clear speech, could understand and be understood, was independent with eating and toileting, refused oral care and bathing. Due to bilateral below the knee amputation, R39 used a wheelchair. R39's physician orders dated 8/22/23, and 3/20/24, included psychotropic, antipsychotic, and anti-depressant medication monitoring for side effects. Orders did not include mood and behavior monitoring. R39's care plan dated 6/2/22, indicated the potential for alteration in mood and behavior related to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to provide timely incontinence care for 1 of 2 residents (R42) who was dependent upon staff for assistance with activities of daily living (ADL). Findings include: R42's Face Sheet printed 6/13/24, included diagnoses of disorientation, malnutrition, Parkinson's disease (progressive disorder that affects the nervous system and parts of the body controlled by the nerves), and epilepsy (seizures). R42's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated R42 had a moderate cognitive impairment, inattention behavior continuously present, and behaviors including rejection of care that occurred 4-6 days out of 7. Activities of daily living (ADL's) included R42 uses a wheelchair and dependent on staff to wheel 50 feet, has impairment on both side of lower extremities for range of motion and requires substantial to maximal assist for transfers, bed mobility, toileting and personal hygiene. Eating requires setup or clean up assist.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to provide timely repositioning for 1 of 1 resident (R42) who was dependent upon staff for repositioning and high risk for pressure ulcers. Findings include: R42's Face Sheet printed 6/13/24, included diagnoses of disorientation, malnutrition, Parkinson's disease (progressive disorder that affects the nervous system and parts of the body controlled by the nerves), and epilepsy (seizures). R42's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated R42 had a moderate cognitive impairment, inattention behavior continuously present, and behaviors including rejection of care that occurred 4-6 days out of 7. Activities of daily living (ADL's) included R42 uses a wheelchair and dependent on staff to wheel 50 feet, has impairment on both side of lower extremities for range of motion and requires substantial to maximal assist for transfers, bed mobility, toileting and personal hygiene. R42 is at high risk for pressure ulcers, has…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure staff were educated and following the fall risk interventions for 1 of 2 residents (R42) identified at risk for falls to prevent further falls. Findings include: R42's Face Sheet printed 6/13/24, indicated R42 had diagnoses of age related cognitive decline, disorientation, obstructive and reflux uropathy (blockage of urine flow), Epilepsy (seizures) and Parkinson's disease (progressive disorder that affects the nervous system and the parts of the body controlled by the nerves). R42's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated R42 had a moderate cognitive impairment, had inattention behavior continuously present, and behaviors of rejection of care that occurred 4-6 days out of 7. Activities of daily living (ADL's) included R42 uses a wheelchair and dependent on staff to wheel 50 feet, has impairment on both side of lower extremities for range of motion and requires substantial to maximal assist for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and document review the facility failed to ensure activities of daily living (ADLs) including timely assistance with toileting and changing soiled clothing were provided for 1 of 1 resident (R57) who needed assistance with toileting and hygiene. Findings include: R57's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated R57 had moderately impaired cognition, no rejection of care, required supervision or touching assistance with transfers, was independent with personal hygiene and toilet hygiene, did not use a wheelchair, and was occasionally incontinent of bladder. Diagnoses included non-Alzheimer's dementia (vascular dementia) and unsteadiness on feet. R57's Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 4/24/24, indicated the need for assistance with toilet use. R57's care plan printed 6/13/24, indicated R57 had an ADL self-care deficit related to vascular dementia without behavioral and psychotic disturbance, muscle weakness, history of falling, and osteoarthritis of knee…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure personal privacy was maintained for 1 of 5 residents (R6) reviewed who required staff assistance with personal care. R6's face sheet identified R6 admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of type 2 diabetes, obesity, dementia, unspecified psychosis. R6's current care plan identified an alteration in behavior and interventions included to go into room with two staff when completing care. On 3/27/24 at 10:22 a.m., nursing assistant (NA)-D came into room to change roommate d/t a strong urine odor in room. Curtain was drawn between roommates. NA-D yelled from the R6's side of the room [LPN-A] he keeps throwing his fists up at me, his sheet is wet. NA-D came over to R3's side of the room angrily with a garbage bag and stated, He just keeps laughing now, it isn't funny. NA-D then left the room. LPN-A stated when a resident was not cooperative staff should let the nurse know and reapproach in 10 minutes. LPN-A stated she would talk to NA-D…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to initiate, comprehensively assess, monitor, and treat skin conditions for 4 of 4 residents (R2, R3, R4, and R5) reviewed for impaired skin integrity. R2's face sheet undated identified an admission date of 7/2021. Diagnoses morbid obesity (obesity categorized by a body mass index greater than 40), type 2 diabetes, urinary incontinence, and erythema intertrigo (inflammatory skin condition caused by skin-to-skin friction (rubbing) that is intensified by heat and moisture). R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R2 needed maximum assistance with movement and complete dependence with toileting. R2 used a motorized wheelchair. R2's current care plan identified an alteration in skin integrity with a goal to remain free of skin breakdown. Interventions included: followed by wound care, monitor skin integrity daily during cares, weekly skin inspection by nurse, treatment to open areas per order, turn and reposition or reminders to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-07-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to follow manufacturers instructions for cleaning and sanitizing two ice machines used for resident consumption. This had the potential to affect all 59 residents who resided in the facility. Findings include: During an observation and interview on 7/24/23 at 8:18 a.m., culinary services director (CSD)-A stated the facility had two ice machines, one located in the kitchen and one in the adjacent dining room. CSD-A stated dietary staff cleaned the outside and maintenance staff deep cleaned the inside. CSD-A stated residents had the potential to consume ice from both ice machines. During document review, paper logs titled Ice Machine Cleaning indicated ice machines had been cleaned monthly in 2022 and 2023. The log did not indicate the type of cleaning that had been conducted. During an interview on 7/26/23 at 11:53 a.m., maintenance assistant (MA)-A stated he was not sure if there were manufacturer instructions for how to, or how often ice machines should be cleaned and sanitized; he had not thought to look at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-07-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to implement and maintain an infection control program that included thorough data collection, analysis of facility infections, and tracking and trending to reduce the spread of infections within the facility. The facility failed to include in their surveillance viral-like illnesses not treated with an antibiotic for staff or residents. The facility had no process in place to identify and monitor other types of infection in the facility and there was no analysis of the data collected. This had the potential to affect all 59 residents residing in the facility. Furthermore, the facility failed to ensure staff were implementing standard precautions for infection control and prevention, appropriately disinfecting reusable resident medical equipment including a scissors (R13) and glucometer (R29). This had the potential to affect all 7 residents using reusable glucometers residing on the southwest (200) wing of unit and two residents using reusable scissors for wound care on the 100 wing of unit. Findings include: On 7/25/23 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-07-27 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespreadImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to implement a process for antibiotic review to determine appropriate indications, dosage, duration, trends of antibiotic use and resistance. This had the potential to affect any of the 59 residents at the facility. Findings include: On 7/25/23 at 2:31 p.m., the director nursing (DON) stated she was the infection prevention nurse and assisted with infection prevention since she started the position as the DON one month ago. The DON stated the antibiotic use was not tracked. The DON stated the nurses completed monitoring of resident symptoms, possible infections, and reported to the provider. The DON stated the providers were responsible to review or track culture results to ensure proper antibiotics were prescribed. The DON confirmed infections, antibiotic indications for use, dosage, duration, cultures, signs, symptoms of infection upon onset, follow-up to ensure symptoms had resolved or an antibiotic had been discontinued timely was not tracked. On 7/25/23 2:45 p.m., during an interview the administrator and regional…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-27 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to inform resident/resident representative in advance of care, of the risks and benefits, possible alternatives to treatment, and receive consent of proposed care prior to initiating psychotropic (mood) medication for 1 of 4 residents (R44) reviewed for dementia care. Findings include: R44's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated moderate cognitive impairment, had clear speech, was able to understand and be understood by others, exhibited mild symptoms of depression (mood disorder), had no behaviors, wandered occasionally, and received antipsychotic and antidepressant (mood disorder) medications. Furthermore, the MDS indicated R44's diagnoses included list Alzheimer's dementia (brain disease causing memory loss and abnormal thinking), anxiety, depression, and hallucinations (mental disorder causing abnormal perception). Facility Medication Review Report, printed on 7/27/23, indicated an order dated 7/2/23, initial order start…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-27 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure adequate and required information was documented and communicated to a receiving healthcare facility to ensure continuity of care for 1 of 1 resident (R44) reviewed for hospitalization, had transferred to hospital emergently. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 59 residents residing in the facility. Finding include: R44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], R44's diagnoses listed on face sheet included: Type 2 diabetes (blood sugar abnormality), muscle weakness, Alzheimer's disease (brain disease causing memory loss and abnormal thinking), malnutrition, major depression (mood disorder), hallucinations (mental disorder causing abnormal perception), anxiety, chronic kidney disease, and pseudo hole of right eye (visual changes). R14's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], identified R44 as having moderate cognitive impairment. R44 was able to understand and was understood. R44 required extensive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-27 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure activities of daily living (ADLs) were provided, including nail care for 1 of 6 residents (R112) reviewed, who needed staff assistance to maintain good personal hygiene. Findings include: R112's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/17/23, indicated R112 had moderate cognitive impairment and required staff assistance for personal hygiene. R112's order summary, printed on 7/27/23, indicated for licensed nurse to complete weekly skin inspection in the evening every Tuesday. R112's care plan, printed on 7/27/23; indicated R112 required assistance by 1 staff member for personal hygiene needs. R112's admission/data collection assessment, completed on 7/10/23, indicated bathing preference included showers during daytime, skin assessed with no concerns at time. Review of R112's weekly skin assessment, reviewed from 7/13/23-7/25/23, indicated a skin assessment had been completed on 7/25/23. Review of R112's bathing task, reviewed from 7/13/23-7/25/23, indicated shower received on 7/19/23,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to assess and provide proper wheelchair positioning to prevent foot drop/contractures for 1 of 2 residents (R16) reviewed for positioning needs. Findings include: R16's current diagnoses found on the undated diagnosis sheet included: cerebral vascular accident (CVA) (damage to the brain from interrupted blood supply), hemiparesis of the left side ( muscle weakness or partial paralysis on one side of the body) and muscle weakness (decreased strength of the muscles). Observation on 7/24/23 at 10:55 a.m., R16 was noted to be sitting in a wheelchair in a sloughed position. R16's right foot was dangling, with only the tip of the toes touching the floor. There was no foot pedal on the wheelchair to provide support. R16's left leg had a protective boot on and resting on a wheelchair pedal. R16's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], identified R16 as having a brief interview of mental status (BIM'S) score of 6 (meaning severely…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-27 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure restorative services to maintain and/or improve mobility was received for 1 of 3 residents (R49), reviewed for mobility. Findings include: R49's significant change in status Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/6/23, indicated R49 had intact cognition, had impairment to both lower extremities (LEs), no impairment to both upper extremities (UEs); required limited assistance for bed mobility and ambulating (walking) in room, required extensive assistance with transfers, used a wheelchair and walker for mobility needs. R49's face sheet, printed on 7/27/23, identified diagnoses list to include morbid obesity, chronic pain, history of falls, dementia (abnormal thinking and memory loss), major depression (mood disorder), acute osteomyelitis (bone infection) to left foot/ankle, partial amputation of left foot. R49's order summary report, printed on 7/27/23, indicated R49 was okay to walk with shoes or post op shoes, no walking with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure staff were implementing fall risk prevention measures for 1 of 3 residents (R44) reviewed for accidents. Findings include: R44's face sheet, printed 7/27/23, indicated diagnosis list included fracture of right femur (leg), type 2 diabetes (blood sugar abnormality), muscle weakness, Alzheimer's disease (brain disease causing memory loss and abnormal thinking), malnutrition, major depression (mood disorder), hallucinations (mental disorder causing abnormal perception), anxiety, chronic kidney disease, spinal stenosis (narrowing of spine) of lumbar (back) region with neurogenic claudication (nerve pain), and pseudo hole of right eye (visual changes). R44's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated R44 had severely impaired cognition, exhibited no behaviors, occasionally wandered, required extensive assist by 1 staff for bed mobility, transfers, locomotion on/off unit, dressing, toileting, personal hygiene,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-27 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure consulting pharmacist recommendations were addressed or acted upon for 2 of 5 residents (R8, R12) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: R8's face sheet printed on 7/26/23, included diagnoses of schizophrenia (a disorder that affects ability to think, feel and behave), high blood pressure, atrial fibrillation (irregular heart beat) and kidney failure. R8's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated severe cognitive impairment requiring extensive assistance of one or two staff for most activities of daily living (ADL's). R8's physician orders included multiple scheduled and as needed medications. R8's care plan dated 1/29/21, indicated R8's medications would be reviewed by a provider and pharmacist. During record review for the past 12 months, the consultant pharmacist entered a monthly progress note into R8's electronic medical record (EMR) indicating either no irregularities or see pharmacist…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-27 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors for 1 of 1 resident (R29) reviewed for insulin administration using an insulin pen. Findings include: R29's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated R29 had intact cognition, diagnoses list included diabetes mellitus (abnormal blood sugars), Alzheimer's disease (brain disease causing abnormal thinking and memory loss), hemiplegia/hemiparesis (paralysis), depression (mood disorder), and received injectable insulin. R29's order summary, dated 6/27/23, indicated physician orders for insulin aspart flexpen subcutaneous solution pen-injector 100 unit/mL- Inject subcutaneously with meals related to type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) with diabetic chronic kidney disease (CKD), blood sugar greater than 400 call medical doctor (MD) and insulin glargine subcutaneous solution 100 unit/mL- Inject 25 units subcutaneously at bedtime related to type 2 DM with diabetic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure doses of controlled substances were stored in a manner to reduce the risk of theft and/or diversion in 1 of 2 refrigerators observed in use for medication storage. This had potential to affect 2 of 2 residents (R15 and R48) residing in the facility who receive this medication. Findings include: On 7/26/23 at 11:44 a.m., the locked north medication room was observed with registered nurse (RN)-A, a locked refrigerator was present. RN-A opened the refrigerator and inside was a box of lorazepam oral concentrate 2 mg/ml labeled with R15's name and a bottle of lorazepam oral concentrate 2 mg/ml labeled with R48's name. RN-A stated the facility practice was to store the lorazepam in the refrigerator and the facility practice did not include the lorazepam stored in a separately affixed box within the refrigerator. On 7/26/23 at 11:58 a.m., during an interview the director of nursing (DON) confirmed lorazepam is a scheduled controlled substance and should be stored in a separately affixed box within the refrigerator. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-27 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident bathroom call light cords were within reach from the bathroom floor for 3 of 3 residents (R2, R43, R47), reviewed for call lights. Findings include: R2's facesheet printed on 7/27/23, included diagnosis of macular degeneration (eye disease that causes vision loss). R2's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated R2 was cognitively intact, had clear speech, could understand, and be understood. R2 required supervision for most activities of daily living (ADL's) including walking in his room and transferring. R2 required extensive assistance of one for toileting. During an observation on 7/24/23 at 11:10 a.m., there was no call light cord observed in R2's bathroom, just a small, older style push button call light on the wall; not intended for a cord to hang from it. During an interview on 7/25/23 at 6:55 p.m., registered nurse (RN)-A confirmed R2 used the toilet in his bathroom and pressed the call light button for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-02-18 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to implement an effective pest control program to eliminate mice in the building. This failure affected R4, and had the potential to affect all 66 residents who resided in the facility. Findings include: R4's diagnoses included diabetes, end stage renal disease (renal failure) requiring dialysis (the process of removing toxins from the body), and transmission based precautions for recurrent clostridium difficile (a bacteria in the bowel which causes diarrhea and fever). R4's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated R4 was cognitively intact, had adequate hearing and vision, clear speech, was understood and able to understand. R4 required assistance from staff for transferring in and out of bed and moving about in a wheelchair. R4 did not walk. During an interview on 2/14/22, at 1:51 p.m., R4 who resided in room [ROOM NUMBER], reported he had mice in his room, I hear them in the ceiling and I've seen them on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-02-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a system for routine reconciliation of controlled substances medication for 1 of 1 emergency kit (E-Kit) to prevent potential loss/diversion. Findings include: On 2/16/22, at 2:30 p.m., a tour of the North medication storage room with nurse manager (NM)-D. Located within the medication storage room was a portable refrigerator that contained the facility E-Kit. The E-Kit consisted of a small tackle box that was secured with a pull away colored tab. The tackle box contained 2 vials of injectable lorazepam (an anti-anxiety medication/controlled substance). Review of the documentation count in the Narcotic bound book,did not identify lorazepam had ever been reconciled by facility staff, to identify or account for any missing medication. Interview with NM-D on 5/12/21, at 11:00 a.m. confirmed staff were not periodically reconciling the E-Kit controlled substances. NM-D indicated she did not understand why reconciling of the E-Kit needed to be done, because only licensed staff had access to the medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-02-18 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure 8 of 71 rooms (rooms 101, 103, 111, 112, 113, 115, 201, 216) were maintained in good repair and in sanitary conditions, impacting 11 residents (R21, R264, R1, R55, R46, R57, R13, R213, R59, R9, R4). In addition, the facility failed to ensure fans used in resident resident rooms (rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]), impacting residents (R3, R32) were kept in a clean and sanitary manner; free of dust and debris. Findings include: During resident screening on 2/14/22, from 12:30 p.m. to 4 p.m., the following observations were made: --room [ROOM NUMBER], occupied by R21: The white toilet bowl was heavily stained with a dark gold, rusty color. --room [ROOM NUMBER], occupied by R1 and R264: An excessive amount of gray dust and debris resembling thick dryer lint was observed in the return air vent on the floor under the window; three ceiling tiles near the window were stained with a gold-colored splatter pattern; the white toilet bowl was heavily stained with a dark…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for 1 of 1 resident (R26) reviewed for smoking,1 of 2 residents (R4) reviewed for transmission based precautions. Findings include: R26's admission record printed 2/17/22, indicated R26 was admitted 9/19, diagnoses included nicotine dependence, diabetes, malignant neoplasm of mandible (jaw cancer), and squamous cell carcinoma (cancer) of skin of other parts of face. R26's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated R26 had intact cognition, no behavior symptoms, required two-person physical assist for activities of daily living, and mobility device of a wheelchair. On 2/14/22, the care plan dated 1/27/22, was reviewed and did not identify R26 smoked or any smoking interventions. The care plan was then updated on 2/14/22, interventions were added to the care plan and included R26 currently smoked, resident will smoke safely, educate on potential dangers of oxygen and cigarette…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-02-18 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolatedProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to update the code status for 1 of 1 resident (R18) reviewed for advanced directives. In addition, the facility failed to accurately document resident's code status throughout the medical record. Findings include: R18's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], identified R18 had intact cognition. R18's face sheet, dated [DATE] and updated on [DATE], identified diagnoses of cerebral infarction (lack of oxygen to brain causing brain damage), aphasia (loss of ability to understand or express speech), diabetes mellitus- type 2, hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), and malignant neoplasm of prostate (prostate cancer). R18's face sheet, dated [DATE], identified advance directive as cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). R18's hospice admission consent form identified on [DATE], R18 had transitioned to hospice care. R18's Provider Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST), dated [DATE], identified Attempt Resuscitation/CPR (Full…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess and monitor the progress of finger lesions for 1 of 1 resident (R28) with non-pressure related skin concerns. Findings include: R28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses (identified on the diagnosis report sheet) dated 1/5/22, included; actinic keratosis ( rough scaly skin caused by the sun) congestive heart failure (CHF) ( a chronic condition in which the heart does not pump blood as well as it should), fibromyalgia (widespread muscle pain and tenderness) osteoarthritis (when bone protective tissue wears down ), spinal stenosis (narrowing of the spinal canal), history of pressure ulcer (PU) on coccyx and buttocks, dehydration and joint pain. Observation and interview on 2/14/22 1:40 p.m. R28 was in her room sitting in her wheelchair. R28 noted to have 3 bandaids on her thumb, 2nd and 3rd fingers of her left hand. The bandaids were partially on the lesions. The lesions looked crusty and cracked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-18 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure consulting pharmacist recommendations were acted upon, addressed, and documented in the medical record for 1 of 5 residents (R17) reviewed for unnecessary medication use. Findings include: R17's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], identified R17 had moderate cognitive impairment, mild depression, required extensive assist with bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene. Diagnoses included Parkinson's disease (chronic and progressive movement disorder causes stiffness or slowing of movement), diabetes, anxiety disorder, depression, and age-related physical disability. The MDS indicated R17 received scheduled pain medication, non-medication interventions for pain, insulin, antidepressant, and opioids. R17's care plan dated 2/16/22, indicated potential for psychotropic drug ADR's [adverse drug reaction] r/t [related to] daily use of psychotropic medication related to diagnosis of depression with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to follow transmission-based precautions by ensuring closure of room doors for 2 of 3 residents (R14, R50) symptomatic and known to be positive with COVID-19. The facility's failure to ensure implementation of proper precautions to prevent or mitigate the risk of COVID-19 outbreak had the potential to affect all other 63 residents and staff within the facility. Findings include: During entrance conference on 2/14/22 at 12:47 p.m., the administrator identified three residents ( R14, R50, R38) confirmed to have COVID-19 and were on droplet/contact precautions, all three residents resided on 500 unit of facility. R14's medical diagnosis listed on admission face sheet, printed on 2/18/22, identified dementia with Lewy body (brain disease causing problems in thinking, movement, behavior, and mood). R14 was diagnosed with positive COVID-19 on 2/7/22, remained asymptomatic throughout isolation period, off precautions on 2/18/22. R50's medical diagnosis listed on admission face sheet, printed on 2/18/22, identified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-02-18 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to provide evidence pneumococcal vaccinations were up to date for 1 of 5 residents (R51) reviewed for vaccinations. Findings include: R51's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated 1/22, indicated an admission date of 1/13/22. The MDS further indicated R51 had intact cognition, was [AGE] years of age, had medically complex health conditions, and was not assessed for pneumococcal vaccination status. R51's admission MDS assessment, dated 1/20/22, identified diagnoses to include; cancer, anemia (a condition of lack of red blood cells), renal insufficiency (a condition that causes poor function of kidneys), cerebrovascular accident (CVA; a condition that causes damage to the brain/stroke), and respiratory failure (a condition that causes poor function of the lungs). When interviewed on 2/17/22, at approximately 1:45 p.m. the regional nurse consultant (RNC) confirmed R51's medical record did not include evidence of pneumococcal vaccinations had been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-02-18 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure COVID-19 vaccination doses were offered to 3 of 5 residents (R41, R49, R51) reviewed for COVID-19 vaccination status. Findings include: R41's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated R41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Reviewed R41's Resident Vaccine Administration Consent Form, signed by R41, her representative, and facility nursing staff on 7/2/21, did not address COVID-19 vaccination. Furthermore, R41's medical record lacked documentation R41 and/or her representative were offered the COVID-19 vaccine upon and/or after admission, nor were provided education related to the risk and/or benefits of the vaccine. R41's medical record lacked documentation that COVID-19 vaccine was administered or contraindicated. R49 R49's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated R49 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Reviewed R49's Resident Vaccine Administration Consent Form, unsigned and undated by R49, his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-07-27 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure the acting infection preventionist (IP) had completed specialized training in infection prevention and control. This had the potential to affect all 59 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 7/25/23 at 2:31 p.m., the director nursing (DON) stated she was the infection prevention (IP) nurse and was responsible for IP since started the position as a DON at the facility a month ago. The DON confirmed the required IP education was not completed and stated she was in the process of infection training. On 7/26/23 at 8:00 a.m., the administrator confirmed the facility did not have a staff member who had completed the infection preventionist training and oversaw IP for the facility. The facility Infection Prevention and Control Program policy dated 3/13/23, indicated: Coordination and Oversight 1. The infection prevention and control program is coordinated and overseen by an infection prevention specialist (infection preventionist). 2. The qualifications and job responsibilities of the Infection…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$17,605 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $17,605 — penalty dated 2025-02-27
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to MONARCH HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT — 45 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.1 | -1.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 3.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 3.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
The other 44 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.2★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 44; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HML LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/15/2015 |
| NIJ LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/16/2015 |
| SPARTAN HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/15/2015 |
| YAZOMA HOLDINGS, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/15/2015 |
| AREM, JEFFREY | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/01/2015 |
| JAFFA, NOAM | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/01/2015 |
| STERN, WILLIAM | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/01/2015 |
| HALPERT, MARC | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE | 23% | since 07/01/2015 |
| LEGUM, JOSHUA | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | 23% | since 07/01/2015 |
| MUENCZ, JEFFREY | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | 13% | since 07/01/2015 |
| MONARCH HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 05/16/2015 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MN
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Minnesota Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 245507. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-06-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.