The Estates At St Louis Park LLC
3201 Virginia Avenue South, Saint Louis Park, MN 55426 · Non profit - Corporation · 145 certified beds · (952) 935-0333 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (26% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2024
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (47) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $107,139 in federal fines (most recent 2024-06-13)
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 5 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 15.7% | 18.2% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.7% | 4.1% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.2% | 1.9% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.9% | 2.6% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 2.5% | 4.1% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.1% | 4.0% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 13.3% | 20.5% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 7.7% | 12.5% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.0% | 96.1% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.9% | 5.2% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 18.6% | 24.5% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 33.1% | 17.1% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 3.1% | 1.9% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 90.2% | 82.7% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 29.0% | 23.5% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 19.5% | 14.8% | 12.0% | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
33.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 36 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 43.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 23 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.14 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 11% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 33.2%CMS range 21.6–52.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.9%CMS range 6.6–15.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 43.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 52.2% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 17.4% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 97.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.6% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.98 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 145 beds and averages 135.2 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.37 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.09 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.82 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.11 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.47 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.16 to 0.92 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 26% is below the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
47 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 34 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2023-10-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to comprehensively assess for appropriate level of supervision for safety in the community for 1 of 3 residents (R1) who had cognitive impairment and a history falls in the community unsupervised. The facility failures resulted in an immediate jeopardy (IJ) when R1 was assaulted and suffered facial injuries while out in the community. The immediate jeopardy began on 8/20/23, when R1 left the facility without staff awareness, was found by law enforcement 9.3 miles away with facial injuries and transferred to hospital. The immediate jeopardy was identified on 10/5/23, and the administrator was notified on 10/5/23, at 4:14 p.m. The immediate jeopardy was removed on 10/6/23, at 4:02 p.m. but noncompliance remained at a lower scope and severity of a D with no actual harm with potential for more than minimal that is not immediate jeopardy. Findings include: R1's admission record included diagnosis of alcoholic cirrhosis of liver with ascites…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-06-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure residents on a secure memory unit were free from harm for 2 of 2 residents (R82 and R17) reviewed for resident-to-resident abuse. This resulted in actual harm when R17 was struck in the face by R82 causing a subconjunctival hemorrhage of the left eye (broken blood vessels in the eye) requiring emergency medical attention. Findings include: According to the state agency (SA) Incident Report, dated 6/9/24, identified a facility's reported allegation of physical abuse involving R17 and R82. The report outlined R17 reported he was struck by R82 in the eye with the incident occurring in R17's room. R17 had a laceration on his left eye and transported to the hospital for evaluation. R82 R82's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/15/24, identified R82 had dementia, post-traumatic stress disorder (a psychiatric disorder that may occur after experiencing or witnessing a traumatic event), restlessness, agitation, and severe impaired cognition. Furthermore, R82 demonstrated able to walk in room…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to routinely assess skin conditions and implement interventions for 1 of 1 residents (R1) reviewed for quality of care. This resulted in actual harm to R1 who admitted to the facility following surgical repair of abdomen due to cancer, did not receive wound care for nine days, and was re-hospitalized due to severe sepsis. Findings include: R1's admission minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1 was cognitively intact had diagnoses of cancer, diabetes mellitus, major surgery involving gastrointestinal tract involving abdominal contents with surgical wound care. The MDS further indicated R1 does not reject care, required supervision with activities of daily living (ADLs), occasionally incontinent of urine, frequently incontinent of bowel, received parental intravenous feeding, and a mechanically altered diet. R1's Care Plan dated 2/21/24, indicated R1 had generalized weakness due to recent surgical removal of pancreas related to malignant…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure kitchen staff used hair restraints while serving food. This had the potential to affect all the residents who reside on 2 South wing who receive eat meals. Findings include:During observation and interview on 8/7/25 at 8:33 a.m., cook (C)-A served food from a steam table on the 2 South unit. C-A had a full head of hair and facial hair on chin and cheeks approximately 1/4 inch long. C-A did not wear a hair net or beard guard. C-A stated he was supposed to wear a hair net but forgot to don one, but was not familiar with a beard guard. C-A left the unit. During observation on 8/7/25 at 8:43 a.m., C-A came back to unit with hair net on and a beard guard and continued to serve food from the steam table. During interview on 8/7/25 at 8:54 a.m., culinary director (CD) stated expectation for servers to wear hair nets and beard guards when dishing up food from the steam table. During interview on 8/7/25 at 9:48 a.m., director of nursing (DON) stated would expect hair nets on when serving food but was unfamiliar…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's preferred activities for individual entertainment were available for 1 of 1 resident (R3) reviewed for activities. Findings include:R3's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R3 had severe cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living (ADLs). Preferences for routine and activities was not assessed. R3's MDS indicated R3 had zero minutes of recreational therapy (to include recreational and music therapy) in the lookback period. R3's diagnoses include hemiplegia (weakness) and hemiparesis (paralysis) following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, dementia, contracture of muscle, aphasia (conditioning affecting speech) and depression. R3's care plan (CP) dated 7/8/25, indicated R3 spoke Vietnamese, Cantonese, and some English. In his free time, he enjoys watching TV-especially Chinese dramas, listening to Vietnamese music, and watching movies. The CP…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess and monitor a skin condition for 1 of 1 resident (R88) reviewed for red areas on chin. Further, the facility failed to ensure a critical lab was followed up on timely for 1 of 1 resident (R138) reviewed for labs. Findings include: R88‘s quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R88 had short- and long-term memory problems and moderately impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making. R88 was independent for most activities of daily living. R88‘s diagnoses included coronary artery disease, heart failure, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dementia, anxiety, and depression. R88 had no skin condition concerns. R88‘s care plan had a focus area for skin initiated 7/23/20 and indicated R88 was at risk for alteration in skin breakdown secondary to diagnosis of diabetes and refusals of cares: showers/baths, etc R88 had history of rash to arms, upper back, and body which healed up and returned after a few…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure range of motion (ROM) was completed on 2 of 2 residents (R3, R35) reviewed who had limited range of motion. In addition, the facility failed to ensure the regular use of a palm protector for 1 of 1 residents (R3) reviewed for splint/brace use. Findings include: R3’s annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R3 had severe cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living (ADLs). R3’s MDS indicated zero minutes of restorative nursing to include passive and active range of motion (ROM) and splint or brace assistance. R3’s MDS further indicated “Behavior not exhibited” for rejection of care assessment. R3’s diagnoses include hemiplegia (weakness) and hemiparesis (paralysis) following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, Parkinson’s, dementia, contracture of muscle, aphasia (conditioning affecting speech) and depression. R3’s care plan (CP) dated 7/8/25, indicated R3 had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a scheduled pain medication was available as ordered for 1 of 1 resident (R102) reviewed for pain. Findings include:R102's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated intact cognition, required partial to moderate assistance with toileting hygiene, supervision with upper and lower body dressing and set up assist with personal hygiene. Further, R102's active diagnoses included: amputation, diabetes mellitus, acquired absence of left leg below the knee, and cutaneous abscess of limb. Additionally, R102 had scheduled pain medication, as needed pain medications, did not receive non medication interventions, had occasional pain during the last 5 days, that occasionally affected sleep, interfered with therapy activities, day to day activities and had a numerical rating of a 4 out of 10 on a 0 to 10 pain scale. R102 had a surgical wound and required surgical wound care and took opioid medications.R102's pain care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure ongoing communication and collaboration with dialysis services for 1 of 1 resident (R138) who had a critically low hemoglobin. Findings include:See also F684: R138's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated intact cognition, did not have behaviors or reject care, had a wheelchair for mobility, required substantial assistance with dressing, toileting hygiene, and personal hygiene, had anemia (low hemoglobin or HGB), end-stage renal disease (ESRD), a coagulation defect (a bleeding disorder affecting the blood's ability to clot), and thrombocytopenia (a condition of a low platelet count in the blood which can lead to increased bleeding and bruising). Further, R138 was on dialysis. R138's Physician's Orders form indicated the following orders:7/16/25, dialysis every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. 8/5/25, lab CBC (complete blood count which includes an HGB), CMP, Mg, PTH, CRP, INR (a blood test that indicates how well the blood can…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-02 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement the baseline care plan developed for 1 of 3 residents (R2, R3 and R4) reviewed. The care plans indicated the residents had cognitive concerns and were to have one-to-one staff care and 15-minute checks. R2 had a fall within hours of admitting to the facility. Upon observation R3 and R4 were not receiving one-to-one cares or 15 minutes checks. Findings include: R2's baseline care plan dated 5/20/25 indicated safety monitoring would be implemented as needed to ensure residents safety, (i.e.) 15-minute safety checks and 1:1 staff to resident ratio. R2's nursing progress note dated 5/20/25 at 2:39 p.m. indicated R2 was arrived at the facility at 2:00 p.m. on a stretcher with one emergency medical systems (EMS) person. R2 was [AGE] years old with a primary diagnosis of glioblastoma (aggressive brain cancer) with recent craniotomy revision (a section of the skull bone is removed to expose the brain for surgery), sepsis (infection of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide fundamental quality of care of professional standards of practice for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for quality of care. R2 had a fall, and the facility was unable to ensure neurological checks (a critical assessment to identify any potential damage to the brain and nervous system) had been completed. Findings include: R2's baseline care plan dated 5/20/25 indicated safety monitoring would be implemented as needed to ensure residents safety, (i.e.) 15-minute safety checks and 1:1 staff to resident ratio. R2's nursing progress note dated 5/20/25 at 2:39 p.m. indicated R2 arrived at the facility at 2:00 p.m. on a stretcher with one emergency medical systems (EMS) person. R2 was [AGE] years old with a primary diagnosis of glioblastoma (aggressive brain cancer) with recent craniotomy revision (a section of the skull bone is removed to expose the brain for surgery), sepsis (infection of the blood) and diabetic wound with a history of bacteria (bacteria…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan indicated the presence of a ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt and include signs and symptoms of VP shunt malfunction for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for comprehensive care plans. Findings include: A VP shunt is defined as a plastic tube that drains extra fluid from the brain into the stomach. A VP shunt may become blocked and can cause excess fluid in the brain which is a neurosurgical emergency. R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated R1 was cognitively impaired and was mostly independent with activities of daily living. R1's face sheet dated 4/17/25, included diagnoses of dementia, psychotic disturbance, nontraumatic intracranial hemorrhage, restlessness and agitation and, mechanical complication of ventricular intracranial shunt. R1's care plan printed 4/17/25, indicated R1 had a traumatic brain injury and was at risk for alteration in skin integrity related to wandering into…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to provide care in a manner that promoted dignity for 2 of 3 residents (R1, R6) reviewed for dignity concerns. Findings include: R1 R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1 was cognitively intact and was frequently incontinent of bowel and required assistance with bathing. R1's diagnoses list printed 2/21/25, included diagnoses of melena (passage of black, tarry stools), and bipolar disorder. R1's care plan dated 1/31/25, indicated R1 required assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) related to persistent diarrhea and identified staff were to assist R1 with personal cares including washing hands, cleaning self, and using the toilet. During an interview on 2/21/25 at 11:44 a.m., family member (FM)-A stated R1 left the facility against medical advice when FM-A visited and found R1 with stool dripping down his leg in the dining room, on his hands, and no sheets on R1's bed. FM-A stated R1 would not like to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 34 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-05 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 resident (R1) remained nothing per oral (NPO), receiving nutrition via tube feeding per his hospital discharge orders. Findings include: R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1 had Parkinson's, hemiplegia and was severely cognitively impaired. In addition R1's MDS indicated he had no behaviors, had impairment in upper and lower extremities, no or unknown for weight loss or weight gain and received feeding via tube feeding and also had a mechanically altered diet, and 51% or more alternative route and 501 cubic centimeters (CC) or more per day by IV (intravenous) or tube feeding, which R1 received tube feeding. R1's Care Plan dated 2/04/25, indicated R1 had Parkinson's and was at risk for malnutrition and dehydration due to dysphagia (swallowing disorder), and received tube feedings per physician order, staff to check placement of tube feeding, residents head of bed to be elevated 30-40 degrees…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure physician ordered weights were implemented as ordered for 2 of 3 residents (R3 and R4), reviewed for nutrition. Findings include: R3's care plan identified a focus dated 5/30/19, of alteration in nutrition .malnutrition related to history of inadequate oral intakes related to variable oral intakes as evidenced by underweight status .intervention dated 5/28/19, directed staff to have dietary consult as needed for weight gain/loss or other problems noted. An additional intervention dated 6/15/22, directed staff to obtain and record weights at least monthly, and more often as indicated by physician orders. R3's Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 11/16/23, identified R3 had a potential for nutritional risk due to reduced micronutrient needs as evidenced by hemodialysis .therapeutic diet related to diabetes and End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD), with hemodialysis. R4 had a history of inadequate oral intakes related to variable oral intake,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to promote a dignified environment for 3 or 4 residents (108, R2, R49) reviewed for resident rights. Findings include: R108's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/14/24, indicated R108 had severe cognitive impairment and required partial to moderate assistance with activities of daily living (except eating) and ambulation in the unit hallways. During observation on 6/12/24 at 7:00 a.m., R108 and seven other residents were seated out in the dining room. Four of the residents had coffee in front of them and four had empty juice and coffee cups sitting in front of them. No interaction was observed between staff and residents as staff was still getting residents up for the day. During an interview and observation on 6/12/24 at 7:31 a.m., clinical coordinator and licensed practical nurse (LPN)-D stated breakfast was not served until around 8:30 most days, which was a long time for these residents to wait. During observation on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to promote a dignified home like environment for 6 or 6 residents (R61, R13, R126, R22, R63, R68). Findings include: R61's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/7/24, indicate admission to facility on 11/9/23 and had severe cognitive impairment. In addition, R61 with no impairment of upper and lower extremities, utilized a walker and wheelchair for mobility, and required substantial assistance with toileting and personal hygiene, and dressing. Also, R61 with diagnoses of benign prostatic hyperplasia (enlarge prostate gland making it difficult to empty bladder), polyneuropathy (numbness in extremities), urinary retention, transient ischemic attacks (cerebral stroke affecting brain function), adjustment disorder, and had an indwelling catheter (to drain urine from bladder into a bag). R61's physician orders (PO) dated 11/3/23 included, Foley Catheter: Please apply leg bag during the day & overnight bag during the evening/night. R61's care plan (CP) dated 6/7/23 indicate, Resident has history of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, facility failed to ensure mediations were kept locked or under direct observation of authorized staff in areas where residents, staff and visitors could access medications. The deficient practice had the potential to affect 32 current residents on the unit. Findings include: During observation on 6/10/24 at 5:35 p.m., at entrance of the 2S dining room there was an unlocked medication cart. Dining room had 12 residents in the room eating dinner and numerous staff walking past the medication cart transporting residents. During observation and interview with registered nurse (RN)-C on 6/10/24 at 5:36 p.m., RN-C walked up to the unattended medication cart and locked the cart. RN-C stated, nurses should be sure the med carts are locked and laptop should be closed due to privacy. RN-C stated the nurse responsible for the unattended medication cart was not in the area and would try to locate them. During interview with licensed practical nurse (LPN)-B on 6/10/24 at 5:37 p.m., LPN-B stated he was responsible for the unattended medication cart and, it is a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to utilize infection control practices while administering medications through gastrostomy tube for 1 of 1 residents (R93) observed for medication administration, utilize infection control practices while delivering meal trays to resident rooms for 7 of 7 residents (R35, R53, R58, R59, R64, R67, R112) observed for dining, while assisting multiple residents to eat at once for 7 of 33 residents (R2, R3, R14,R23, R33, R55, R80) observed for dining. In addition, the facility failed to implement and maintain enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for 2 of 2 resident (R16, R93) reviewed for transmission based precautions. Furthermore, the facility failed to mitigate transmission of potential infections in relation to laundering of linens and personal items. Findings include: Med Admin R93 R93's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] state admission to facility on 4/6/22, was severely cognitively impaired, and diagnoses of hemiplegia…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident records which contained private, medical, and personal information were kept private and not accessible to unauthorized personnel for 1 of 1 residents (R35) reviewed for privacy. Findings include: During observation on 6/10/24 at 5:35 p.m., an unattended medication cart located at entrance of second floor dining room with laptop open to R35 medication list was observed. Dining room had 12 residents in the room eating dinner and numerous staff walking past the medication cart. During observation and interview with registered nurse (RN)-C on 6/10/24 at 5:36 p.m., RN-C walked up to the unattended medication cart and closed the laptop screen. RN-C stated, nurses should be sure the med carts are locked and laptop should be closed due to privacy. RN-C stated the nurse responsible for the unattended medication cart was not in the area and would try to locate them. During interview with licensed practical nurse (LPN)-B on 6/10/24 at 5:37 p.m., LPN-B stated he was responsible for the unattended medication cart and, it…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure timeliness of person-centered care conferences were conducted to ensure resident goals and preferences were discussed for 1 of 1 residents (R93) reviewed for care conferences. Findings include: R93's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/28/24 identified admission to facility on 4/6/22, was severely cognitively impaired, with diagnoses of hemiplegia (paralysis) affecting right dominant side, stroke, depression, gastrostomy (feeding through a tube into the abdomen), and Parkinson's (progressive brain disorder affecting muscle control, balance and movement). R93's electronic medical record (EMR) indicates MDS assessments were completed on 4/12/22, 7/9/22, 10/5/22, 1/3/23, 3/30/23, 6/9/23, 9/27/23, 12/28/23, and 3/28/24. R93's EMR indicated care conferences were conducted on 1/4/23, 3/29/23, 4/5/23, 10/5/23 and 2/19/24. R93's medical record failed to show care conference were conducted on 4/12/22, 7/22/22, 10/5/22, 6/9/23, 12/28/23. During interview with director of nursing (DON) on 6/13/24 at 8:27 a.m.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure routine personal hygiene assistance was provided to 2 of 2 residents (R28 and R56) reviewed for ADLs. In addition, facility failed to implement a communication system to ensure resident needs were met for 1 of 1 resident (R93) whose primary language was not English. Findings include: R28's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified admission to facility on 1/5/12 and intact cognition. During observation on 6/10/24 at 2:13 p.m., R28 laying in bed, dressed and had black matter under her fingernails. During observation and interview with R28 on 6/11/24 at 2:27 p.m., R28 laying in bed, dressed and had black matter under her fingernails. R28 stated, No, no one asks me if they can cleanout my nails. They can be gross if not soaked and taken care of. The aide [nursing assistant] should be asking me at least. During interview with registered nurse (RN)-D on 6/11/24 at 2:27 p.m., RN-D stated she had worked full time…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's preferred activities for individual entertainment were available for 1 or 1 residents (R93) reviewed for activities. Additionally, facility failed to comprehensively assess for, and provide, individualized activities for 1 of 1 transitional care unit (TCU) resident (R106). Findings include: R93's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicates admission to facility on 4/6/22, was severely cognitively impaired, and diagnoses of hemiplegia (paralysis) affecting right dominant side, stroke, depression, gastrostomy (feeding through a tube into the abdomen), and Parkinson's (progressive brain disorder affecting muscle control, balance and movement). In addition, R93's preferred language was documented as OTHER. R93's Therapy Recreation Evaluation and Social History evaluation on 4/6/22 state R93 nationality of Vietnamese, and enjoyed fishing, listening to music and watching movies. R93's care plan (CP)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the failed to provide services to maintain and/or prevent loss of range of motion and contracture care for 1 of 1 residents (R93 ) reviewed for limited range of motion. Further, the facility failed to maintain a resident's walking program to prevent any loss of independence, strength or range of motion for 1 of 1 resident (R108) reviewed. Findings include: R93's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] included severely cognitively impaired, and diagnoses of hemiplegia (paralysis) affecting right dominant side, stroke, depression, and Parkinson's (progressive brain disorder affecting muscle control, balance and movement). R93's physician orders (PO) dated 2/1/23 indicates, Tx [treatment] to R[right] hand to protect from skin breakdown: Wash hand with warm soapy water, ensure skin is dried completely, weave gauze between fingers, place ABD (abdominal pads or ABD dressings for large or draining wounds) to palm of hand and wrap with kerlix. Change…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure pain with mobility (i.e., repositioning) was appropriately monitored and comprehensively re-assessed then, if needed, interventions developed to promote comfort with mobility for 1 of 2 residents (R92) reviewed for pain management. Findings include: R92's Medicare - 5 Day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/10/24, identified R92 had intact cognition and demonstrated no delusional thinking. The MDS outlined R92 consumed scheduled and as-needed (i.e., PRN) pain medication, however, did not receive any non-pharmacological interventions during the review period. The MDS recorded R92's pain interview responses (i.e., J0300 to J0600) as, Not assessed. R92's most recent MHM (Monarch Healthcare Management) Pain Evaluation - V3, dated 3/21/24, identified R92 consumed scheduled pain medication; however, did not receive any PRN medication or non-pharmacological interventions for pain. The evaluation outlined a pain interview was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure post-dialysis access site monitoring was consistently completed and documented to provide continuity of care and reduce the risk of complication (i.e., bleeding, infection) for 1 of 1 resident (R49) reviewed for dialysis care and services. Findings include: R49's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated R49 had moderate cognitive impairment and demonstrated no rejection of care behavior. The MDS indicated R49 was diagnosed with kidney disease with dialysis treatment and a stroke with aphasia (a disorder affecting speech). The MDS indicated R49 was able to independently wheel 50 feet, required set-up help for eating, and was dependent on staff for transfers. R49's Order Summary Report dated 6/22/23, indicated an order to monitor for bruit (whooshing sound) and a thrill (a powerful pulse felt at the top of the fistula) every shift. An order dated 6/13/24, indicated nursing staff should monitor and view…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess history of past trauma and implement care plan interventions to identify triggers for 1 of 1 residents reviewed (R18) whose diagnoses included post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Findings include: R18's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified admission to facility on 4/12/23, intact cognition, and diagnoses of seizure disorder, anxiety, depression, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and PTSD. R18's care plan (CP) goal dated 4/27/22 indicated, Resident has PTSD, R 18's mother was abusive and she was a victim of sexual assault in 1970, which may have resulted in pregnancy & a coma. R18 interventions included, Staff will utilize trauma informed care when working with resident, Staff will consider past trauma when engaging in work with resident, Consider past trauma when engaging with resident. R18's care plan lacked identified triggers to avoid re-traumatization. R18's nursing assistant care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to address and respond to the consulting pharmacist's (CP) medication regiment review (MRR) for 2 of 5 residents (R75 and R83) receiving psychotropics (a psychoactive medication taken to exert an effect on the chemical makeup of the brain and nervous system) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: R75's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/9/24, indicated R75 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], had severe cognitive impairment, was independent with ambulation and was receiving the following medications during the look back period; antipsychotics, antianxiety, antidepressants, and opioids. R75's MRR, dated 4/26/24, indicated it was unclear if R75's falls were related to medication and recommended considering reducing R75's Hydroxyzine order to 25 mg at 2:00 p.m. The report included: R75 had multiple falls within the past month and was receiving the following medications that may increase fall risk; Citalopram 20…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a resident taking an antipsychotic medication had an appropriate diagnosis for use and was monitored for target behaviors for 1 of 5 residents (R83) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: R83's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated R83 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], had severe cognitive impairment, was independent with ambulation, and received the following medications during the look back period; antipsychotics and antidepressants. R83's Medical Diagnoses, indicated R83 diagnoses including dementia with behavioral disturbances, major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety. R83's electronic medical record (EMR) lacked evidence of resident specific target behaviors or monitoring for behaviors, R83's MRR, dated 4/26/24, indicated R83 was receiving the following medications; Seroquel 25 mg three times a day, Mirtazapine 7.5 mg every evening (an antidepressant used to treat depression), and Depakote…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to implement the current standards of vaccinations regarding pneumonia for 1 of 5 residents (R17) over [AGE] years old whose vaccinations histories were reviewed. Findings include: A CDC Pneumococcal Vaccine Timing for Adults feature, dated 3/15/2023, identified various tables when each (or all) of the pneumococcal vaccinations should be obtained. This identified when an adult over [AGE] years old had received the complete series (i.e., PPSV23 and PCV13; see below) then the patient and provider may choose to administer Pneumococcal 20-valent Conjugate Vaccine (PCV20) for patients who had received Pneumococcal 13-valent Conjugate Vaccine (PCV13) at any age and Pneumococcal Polysaccharide Vaccine 23 (PPSV23) at or after [AGE] years old. R17's facility Immunization Record, print date 6/13/24, indicated he was [AGE] years old. The record indicated he received PPSV23 on 1/31/2013 followed by the PCV-13 on 10/4/2016. The immunization record lacked evidence of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure closet doors in disrepair were reported and acted upon in a timely manner to promote a safe, homelike environment for 1 of 1 resident (R92) reviewed whose closet door was broken with exposed nails present. Findings include: A Vulnerable Adult Maltreatment Report, dated 7/2023, identified a general concern about the care center which included, . [it] needs major repairs and there are multiple things that are broken. R92's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS)assessment, dated 3/21/24, identified R92 had intact cognition and demonstrated no delusional thinking. On 6/10/24 at 1:46 p.m., R92 was observed lying in bed while in his room. The room had an off-white colored closet with double doors which opened towards the foot of R92's bed. However, the closet door was in disrepair with the door and attached frame being pulled away from the wall several inches exposing multiple construction nails with the bevel-end open to the outside (i.e., room). The door was loose to touch and the closet' interior was visible…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a resident call light was within reach for 1 of 3 residents (R3) and failed to ensure call light cords were adequately cleaned for 2 of 3 residents (R1, R3) reviewed for call lights. Findings include: R3's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated they were cognitively intact, dependent on staff for toileting, transfer, and personal hygiene, required maximal assistance with bed mobility., and used a power wheelchair. R5 was super morbidly obese and had visual impairment. R3's care plan dated 3/29/24, indicated R5 was at risk for falls and directed staff to keep the call light within reach. During observation and interview on 4/24/24 at 11:27 a.m., R3 was seated in their wheelchair next to the left side of the bed toward the back of the room. R3's call light cord was draped around the lower right corner of the mattress, then down toward the floor at the end of the bed with the button tucked into the top drawer of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to provide toileting and repositing assistance for a 1 of 1 residents (R3) dependent on staff and failed to follow a resident's preference for getting out of bed due to a lack of Hoyer (a full body mechanical lift used to lift and transfer residents) and sling availability for 2 of 2 resident (R3, R1) reviewed for activities of daily living for dependent residents. This had the potential to affect 15 bariatric residents in the facility who required a Hoyer lift for transfers. Findings include: R3 R3's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated R3 was cognitively intact, and was dependent on staff for turning, positioning and toileting. Diagnoses included morbid obesity, chronic pain, chronic kidney disease, irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea, urinary incontinence, history of urinary tract infection, gout, and peripheral vascular disease. R3's Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated, 4/25/24, triggered for self-care assistance and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to preserve resident's dignity for 3 of 4 residents (R1, R3, R4) reviewed for toileting assistance. Findings include: R1's Face Sheet printed 3/13/24, indicated diagnoses which included chronic systolic heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and type II diabetes. R1's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated R1 was cognitively intact. R1's care plan dated 3/6/24, indicated toileting interventions that included assist of one for voiding in the urinal, assist of one with bowel movement in bedpan, and check and change every two to three hours as needed. R3's Face Sheet printed 3/13/24, indicated diagnoses which included chronic systolic heart failure, atherosclerotic heart disease, chronic kidney disease, and type II diabetes. R3's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated he was cognitively intact, and required a two person assist with toileting. R3's care plan revised on 1/17/24, indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of abuse was reported to the State Agency (SA) immediately (within 2 hours) for 2 of 5 residents (R1, R2) reviewed for allegations of resident-to-resident abuse. Findings include: R1's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated R1 had severely impaired cognition. R1's diagnoses included dementia, depression, and a history of strokes. R2's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated R2 had severely impaired cognition. R2's diagnoses included dementia and encephalopathy. On 1/6/24 at 6:45 p.m. a Facility Reported Incident (FRI) submitted to the SA indicated R2 pushed R1 to the ground after a verbal altercation. R1 fell on the floor and sustained a bruise on her forehead and left arm. On 1/10/24 at 3:34 p.m. registered nurse (RN)-A stated he responded to the altercation a few minutes after it had happened. RN-A stated the incident happened on 1/5/24 sometime between 11:00 p.m. and 11:30 p.m. RN-A stated he did…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-06 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to report a missing vulnerable adult to the State Agency (SA) for 1 of 1 resident (R1) who left the facility without staff awareness and was assaulted while out in the community unsupervised. Findings include R1's admission record included diagnosis of alcoholic cirrhosis of liver with ascites (build up of fluid in the belly), alcohol dependence in remission, anxiety disorder, repeated falls, and altered mental status unspecified. R1's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], noted R1 was cognitively intact. R1 was independent with activities of daily living (ADL)'s. R1 required setup help only with eating, personal hygiene, and bathing. R1 was always steady with walker. R1's Release of Responsibility for Leave of Absence (LOA) form, indicated R1 had signed himself out 8 times between 4/22/23 through 8/23/23. The form included: date out, time out, signature of person accepting responsibility, destination contact person phone number, date…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-04 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 20 residents rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER]) was maintained in a way to prevent mold infestation and failed to maintain the ice machine in a sanitary manner which contained a build up of lime and a brown and black substance where 135 residents were identified as potentially receiving ice out of. Findings include: During observation on 5/1/23, at 2:58 p.m. Rm. 284 was observed. The ceiling had a dark brown stain with water stains running down wall to the top of air conditioner. A line of black furry substance extended approximately two to three feet along the top of air conditioner on the wall. During observation on 5/2/23, at 3:14 p.m. Dark brown stain on ceiling, water stains running down wall and black furry substance on the wall along top of air conditioner remain unchanged. On 5/3/23, at 8:21 a.m. housekeeper (HSK)-A was cleaning area and was interviewed and observed Rm. 284 with surveyor. Housekeeper looked at area above air…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-04 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to provide a dignified toileting routine for 1 of 1 resident (R19) who expressed feelings of degradation over the facility toileting process. Findings include: R19's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R19 was cognitively intact and received assistance with all activities of daily living (ADL's). R19's care plan revised on 12/13/22, indicated R19 required assistance with toileting, and directed staff to provide staff assistance with peri-care every 3 hours and as needed (PRN) and to provide incontinent products and assist to change as needed. When interviewed on 5/1/23, at 3:07 p.m. R19 stated that he had previously (at previous facility) used a bedpan for toileting. R19 stated when he was first admitted to this facility, he had asked for a bed pan and was told they do not use bed pans here and was instructed to have a bowel movement in his incontinent brief. Staff would help him clean up. When interviewed on 5/3/23, at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-04 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure resident was comprehensively assessed for self-administration of medications for 1 of 1 resident (R9), who were observed self-administering medications. R9's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], identified R9 was cognitively intact, and required supervision with ADL's. Findings included: R77's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified cognitively intact. R9's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], identified cognitively intact with diagnosis including lung disorders. During observation and interview on 5/2/23, at 1:30 p.m. R9 was in R77's room and stated a nebulizer machine and multiple vials of medication (budesonide-a steroid inhalation medication) that was on R77's nightstand was his and that he keeps them in R77's room for convenience as he spends time in R77's room frequently. R9 stated he uses the nebulizer machine and medication at least daily. R9 stated, The nurse knows it's in here, how else do you think I got the stuff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY R68's face sheet dated 5/4/23, indicated R68's diagnoses included hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), major depressive disorder and type II diabetes mellitus. R68's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], indicated R68 required extensive to full physical assistance from another person for activities of daily living (ADL) including bathing, grooming and personal hygiene. R68 was independent with eating after set up by another person. R68's cognition was intact; her speech was unclear but was usually able to make herself understood. R68's care plan with a print date 5/4/23, indicated R68 was cooperative with cares and required assistance with nail care. R68 sometimes scratched herself and would break her skin. Weekly skin inspected dated 5/1/23, indicated R68's nails were trimmed during her bath on 5/1/23. The note failed to indicate if attempts were made to clean under her nails. On 5/1/23, at 2:33 p.m. R68 was observed with 1/2 inch to ¾ inch long fingernails on both of her hands with an unknown thick, dark…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure treatment for edema was completed as ordered by the physician for 1 of 1 residents (R59) reviewed for edema. Findings include: R59's significant change minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], stated R59 required extensive assistance with two persons for dressing. Dressing included donning/removing compression stockings. R59's activities of daily living (ADLs) care area assessment (CAA) dated 3/30/2023, showed R59 needed extensive assistance for most ADLs, which included dressing. R59's cognitive loss CAA dated 4/5/2023, suggested presence of inattention, disorganized thinking, and altered level of consciousness. R59's active orders listed, compression stockings when up two times a day for edema which initiated 3/31/23. The medical record for April and May 2023 showed nursing marked the order as, administered except for two entries in April which had no response listed (4/17/23 and 4/28/23). R59's orders listed to monitor for slight…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-04 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure recommendations for cataract evaluation were acted upon for 1 of 1 resident (R19) reviewed for vision. Findings include: R19's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R19 was cognitively intact and was able to communicate needs and wishes without difficulty. R19's care plan revised 3/24/23, indicated R19 to have alteration in vision and wears glasses due to visual deficit. The care plan directed staff to provide assistance to set up Ophthalmology appointments as needed or requested by resident or family. On 5/1/23, at 3:03 p.m. R19 was in his room watching television with no eyeglasses in place. R19 stated his eyes are a total mess and has been trying to get something done with his eyes. R19 stated that he can not see anything clearly and could not make out surveyor face as it was all blurry. He had been seen by the eye doctor at the facility and was informed by the eye doctor that he had cataracts. R19 stated that he had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-04 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to implement pressure ulcer interventions for 1 of 3 residents (R40) reviewed who were identified as at risk for pressure ulcer development. Finding include: R40's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified resident as dependent on staff for all activities of daily living (ADL's) and at risk for pressure ulcers. R40's diagnoses included, dementia and had a stroke with left sided weakness. R40's care plan dated 2/21/23, identified a risk for skin breakdown due to a stroke, left sided weakness, a history of wounds to feet and ankles that spontaneously re-open. Staff were directed to use an air mattress on the bed, encourage and assist to turn and reposition every 2-3 hours and as needed. R40 was to have a protective dressing on the heel, a pressure reducing wheelchair cushion and Prevalon boots (a boot with a cushioned bottom that floats the heel off the surface of the mattress, helping to reduce pressure) or a pillow for floating…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure safe medication storage for 1 of 1 residents (R77) who was noted to have medications stored in her room without an order for the specific medication. Findings include: On 5/2/23, at 8:32 a.m. a nebulizer machine was noted on R77's nightstand. Next to the nebulizer machine were seven plastic vials of clear liquid labeled, budesonide (medication used to treat asthma). R77 indicated the machine and medication did not belong to her but belonged to her male friend. She did not use the machine or the medication. R77's medical record confirmed R77 did not have an order for budesonide. On 5/3/23, at 3:04 p.m. licensed practical nurse (LPN)-A confirmed R77 did not have an order for budesonide. LPN-A was not aware that R77 had the medication in her room. On 5/4/23, at 1:30 p.m. director of nursing (DON) indicated she was not aware that R77 had medication stored in her room. DON expected all medications were stored in the appropriate area, such as a medication cart or medication room, unless they are ordered for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-04 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to provide or obtain routine dental services for 1 of 1 residents (R114) reviewed for oral/dental health. Findings include: R114's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified she was admitted [DATE], had severely impaired cognition and diagnoses of non-traumatic brain dysfunction and dementia. R114's admission paperwork included an undated and unsigned document with resident's name, date of birth , medical record number and primary's name entitled, HealthDrive Attending Physician Request for Services/Consultation, and indicated under the dental section, poor oral hygiene and, unable to properly care for teeth as reasons to have a dental provider examine the resident. R114's nursing oral/dental evaluation dated 10/3/22, indicated several missing teeth and a lack of dentures. R114's nursing oral/dental evaluations dated 11/15/22 and 2/14/23 indicated several missing teeth, a lack of dentures and that she would need staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-05-04 · tag F0577 — widespreadAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure three years of survey results/complaints were readily accessible. This had the potential to affect all 119 residents, their families and any visitors who may have wished to review the information. Findings include: During an observation on 5/4/23, at 11:50 a.m. a sign on the table at the facility entrance indicated survey results for past three years were available for review. The administrator and associate administrator were not able to easily locate the binder. With further observation, a binder was noted on the bottom shelf of the table, facing down. There was no label on the back cover or edge of the binder. When the binder was turned over, it was noted to have a label indicating it contained survey results. Contents of the binder included recertification survey results from 10/15/21. The binder did not include complaint survey or revisit survey results from 11/9/21, 1/26/22, 6/1/22, 7/7/22 and 9/28/22. On 5/4/23, at 11:53 a.m. the administrator confirmed the contents of the survey binder. She…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-05-04 · tag F0623 — widespreadProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to notify the Long-Term Care (LTC) Ombudsman of a facility-initiated transfer for 1 of 1 resident (R124) reviewed for hospitalization. This had the potential to affect all 119 residents who resided in the facility. Findings include: R124's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R124 was cognitively intact. R124's progress note dated 3/3/23, at 1:52 p.m., registered nurse (RN)-D indicated R124 was sent to the emergency room for an evaluation of abdominal pain. R124 was discharged to the hospital on 3/3/23. R124 refused to sign bed hold paperwork. During an interview on 05/03/23 at 1:58 p.m., social service designee, (SSD)-A, stated, she would give the resident ombudsman information. If the resident left against medical advice, (AMA), she would complete a Minnesota Adult Abuse Reporting Center (MAARC) report. SSD-A added if the resident chose to go home, the facility would plan a discharge to a safe place for the resident to go. If SSD-A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$107,139 in federal fines across 3 penalties.
- $50,141 — penalty dated 2024-06-13
- $41,074 — penalty dated 2024-02-29
- $15,924 — penalty dated 2023-10-06
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to MONARCH HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT — 45 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.2 | +0.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 5 of 5 | 3.7 | +1.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 3.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
The other 44 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.2★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 44; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NIJ LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 7% | since 10/01/2017 |
| SPARTAN HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 30% | since 10/01/2017 |
| YAZOMA HOLDINGS, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 30% | since 10/01/2017 |
| AREM, JEFFREY | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 7% | since 10/01/2017 |
| STERN, WILLIAM | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 20% | since 10/01/2017 |
| HALPERT, MARC | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | 30% | since 10/01/2017 |
| JAFFA, NOAM | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 7% | since 10/01/2017 |
| LEGUM, JOSHUA | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | 30% | since 10/01/2017 |
| MONARCH HEALTHCARE OPERATING IV LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 10/01/2017 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MN
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Minnesota Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 245148. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-07, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.