No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

The Villas At The Cedars

7900 West 28th Street, Saint Louis Park, MN 55426 · For profit - Corporation · 107 certified beds · (952) 920-8380 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (952) 920-8380 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jul 2023Resident-funds citation (F0565)1 actual-harm citation2 immediate-jeopardy citations CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$22,205 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jul 2023
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (59) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $22,205 in federal fines (most recent 2024-09-19)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
8900 Highway 7 · (952) 935-8407 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
7200 Cedar Lake Rd S · (952) 252-2502 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
8020 Minnetonka Blvd · (952) 658-8841 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
2734 Rhode Island Ave S · (952) 405-6760

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased15.3%18.2%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.2%4.1%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.0%1.9%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.6%2.6%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.7%4.1%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.0%4.0%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened11.8%20.5%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication14.4%12.5%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine90.8%96.1%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers7.7%5.2%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control18.3%24.5%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table9.0%17.1%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.4%1.9%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine70.6%82.7%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission24.6%23.5%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit13.3%14.8%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.421.611.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.351.901.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

44.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 59 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

44.3%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
60.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.26U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.09hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 60.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 30 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 38% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF44.3%CMS range 32.7–59.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.2%CMS range 6.3–14.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge60.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge46.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge33.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified85.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting95.2%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.8%CMS range 3.5–11.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.791.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.77
RN hours/ resident / day
0.51
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.12
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.40
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.49
RN hoursweekends
39.3%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 107 beds and averages 89.9 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 17 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.40 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.77 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.12 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.08 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.53 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.88 to 0.49 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-09-19)
13
at the previous standard inspection (2023-07-14)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

59 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 46 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-01-27 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a medication was available for administration for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for medication errors. This resulted in immediate jeopardy (IJ) when R1 was not administered physician prescribed anti-seizure medication which resulted in hospital intensive care unit (ICU) admission for medical management and treatment. The IJ began on 1/17/26 when the facility failed to ensure R1 received scheduled dose Lacosamide (anti-seizure medication) on 1/17/26, 1/18/26, and 1/19/2026 (six doses) and an additional dose not administered on morning of 1/20/26 this caused R1 to have 3 seizures over the span of 7 minutes resulting in hospital ICU admission where R1 remains. The administrator, the director of nursing, and the regional director of operations were notified of the IJ on 1/27/26 at 4:40 p.m. The facility had implemented actions to prevent recurrence prior to the survey therefore, the citation was issued at past non-compliance (PNC).Findings…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor and notify the physician following a change in condition for one of three residents, (R1) who had multiple episodes of vomiting that began on [DATE] and continued through [DATE] when R1 died. This resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) for R1. The IJ began on [DATE] when R1's had a change in condition was not monitored, nor was the physician notified of R1's change in condition that started on the evening of [DATE] and continued through the morning of [DATE] when R1 passed away. The IJ was identified on [DATE]. The administrator and the director of nursing were notified of the immediate jeopardy at 10:47 a.m. on [DATE]. The immediate jeopardy was removed on [DATE] and the deficient practice was corrected on [DATE], prior to the start of the survey and was therefore past non-compliance. Findings include: R1's face sheet indicated R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder. R1's additional…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-08-05 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to comprehensively and accurately re-assess, develop and implement interventions to reduce/prevent significant and continued weight loss for 1 of 3 resident (R2) reviewed for weight loss. This resulted in actual harm when R2 was hospitalized for malnutrition. Findings Include: Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) considers weight loss 'significant' if it exceeds 5 percent (%) within one month, 7.5% within three months, or 10% within six months. R2's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], identified an admission date of 3/13/25, indicated R2 was severely cognitively impaired and had diagnoses of cerebral palsy, depression, and enlarged prostate know as benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), obstructive uropathy (blockage hindering urine flow), and Rhabdomyolysis (muscle breakdown). R2 weighed 147 pounds, received a mechanically altered diet, was not on a weight prescribed regimen, and a box was marked yes for weight loss of 5% or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-03 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to report a change in condition to the provider and family for 1 of 3 residents (R2) when R2 had an acute episode of hypoxemia (low levels of oxygen in the blood characterized by symptoms that may include shortness of breath and bluish lips) during a combined physical and occupational therapy assessment. Findings include: R2's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated intact cognition, R2 did not require oxygen or respiratory assistive devices, and had diagnoses that included chronic lung disease. R2's admission Data Collection (nursing assessment) dated 1/28/26 at 3:45 p.m., indicated R2's oxygen saturation rate on 1/28/26 at 2:26 p.m., was 96% on room air with a respiration rate of 18 breaths per minute, normal respirations, and R2 used a continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) machine (used to treat sleep apnea - a condition where breathing repeatedly stops and starts during sleep). R2's provider orders dated 1/28/26, indicated CPAP…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and document review, the facility failed to assess and monitor 1 of 3 residents (R2) per the provider orders on admission and failed to comprehensively assess and monitor 1 of 3 residents (R2) after a change in condition when R2 participated in therapy, his lips turned blue and had a significant decrease in oxygen saturation rate. Findings include: R2's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated R2 had intact cognition, required no oxygen or respiratory assistive devices, and had diagnoses that included chronic lung disease. R2's baseline care plan dated 1/28/26 indicated intact cognition and an alteration in oxygen/gas exchange with interventions to monitor oxygen saturations as ordered and as needed (PRN), monitor for cyanosis (bluish or discoloration of lips caused by lack of oxygen), monitor and document on respiratory status, administer oxygen as ordered, and keep doctor informed of changes. R2's provider orders indicated the following:Starting 1/28/26 at 3:00 p.m., monitor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-03 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to sufficiently manage pain for 1 of 3 residents (R2) when R2 reported severe pain and was not provided with pain medications until more than 24 hours later.Findings include: R2's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated intact cognition and a diagnosis that included spinal stenosis (narrowing of the spaces within the spine which puts pressure on the nerves and spinal cord) of the cervical (neck) region and required active care at the facility for aftercare for surgery that involved fusion of the spinal bones. R2 received opioid pain medications as needed (PRN), and pain occasionally interfered with activities. R2's baseline care plan dated 1/28/26, indicated intact cognition, pain/comfort issues, with a goal for adequate pain relief, and interventions that included non-medicinal forms of pain relief such as position, rest, and massage, and included pain medications as ordered by the physician. R'2s provider orders dated indicated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-03 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to verify and accurately transcribe orders for 1 of 3 residents (R1) when a blood pressure medication with conflicting dose and types were prescribed for R1 and then then transcribed incorrectly. Additionally, the facility failed to timely administer prescribed pain medication for 1 of 3 residents (R2) who was admitted post-surgically after a cervical (neck) spinal fusion.Findings include:R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated intact cognition, with diagnoses that included heart failure, orthostatic hypotension (blood pressure that drops significantly when first sitting up or standing up), and stroke. R1's hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] indicated R2 was prescribed metoprolol succinate (long-acting type) 50 milligrams (mg) twice daily, in the morning and bedtime. R1's facility orders indicated the following:Metoprolol succinate ER (extended release) 50 mg, give 1 tablet daily by mouth 12/13/25 to 1/16/25 at 8:00 a.m.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan in a timely manner following a verbal altercation for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for abuse. This failure placed R2 at risk for psychosocial distress and potential recurrence of resident-to-resident conflict.Findings include:R2's hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE], identified R2 diagnoses included severe recurrent major depression (MDD) and neurocognitive deficits.R2's associated clinic of psychology note dated 12/22/25, identified R2 diagnoses included posttraumatic stress disorder and major depressive disorder, recurrent episode, moderate.R2's activity of daily living (ADLs) care plan dated 3/7/25 indicated R2 was at risk for decreased cognitive related to PTSD (post traumatic syndrome disorder) and MDD. ADLs care plan dated 3/10/25 directed staff to monitor for signs of emotional distress or mood and behavior changes and safety monitoring will be implemented as needed to ensure residents safety.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-02 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to support the facility-sponsored and individual activities for residents' preference to support their physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 2 of 3 residents (R1 & R2) who were dependent on staff for activities.Findings include: R1's care plan dated 6/10/25 indicated R1 had little or no activity involvement and wished not to participate. R1's goal was that he would express satisfaction with the type of activities and the level of activity involvement when asked. R1's interventions was staff was to respect his right to decline involvement in group activities. The care plan did not indicate any self-guided activities offered to R1 or how the facility encouraged the support and development of his interests, hobbies, and skills. R1's Evaluation and Social History assessment dated [DATE] indicated R1 was oriented to self, person, place, and time. He had visual deficits, but no hearing deficits to impact activity participation. R1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident received treatment and care professional standards of practice for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for quality of care. R1 received treatments that were not ordered and R1 was simultaneously seeing an outpatient wound clinic and the facilities inhouse wound care team who both prescribed different wound care orders leading to inconsistent treatment for R1's wound including missed treatments and inaccurate assessments. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident received treatment and care professional standards of practice for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for quality of care. R1 received treatments that were not ordered and R1 was simultaneously seeing an outpatient wound clinic and the facilities inhouse wound care team who both prescribed different wound care orders leading to inconsistent treatment for R1's wound including missed treatments and inaccurate assessments.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow enhanced barrier precautions (an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resident organisms that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident activities) for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (R1). In addition, during a wound care dressing change staff failed to follow proper infection control protocol.Findings include: Upon observation on 9/29/25 at 11:50 a.m. R1 had an enhanced barrier precaution (EBP) sign posted outside his room. The sign indicated everyone must: clean their hands, including before entering and leaving the room. Providers must also wear gloves and a gown for the following high contact resident care activities:-Dressing-Bathing/Showering-Transferring-Changing linens-Providing hygiene-Changing brief or assisting with toileting-Device care use, central line, urinary catheter, feeding tube and tracheostomy-Wound care - any skin opening requiring a dressing. R1's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-15 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to attempt alternative devices before using bedrails on residents beds. The failed to accurately assess the residents for risk of entrapment by assessing residents medical diagnosis, size and weight, cognition, communication and mobility for 5 of 7 residents (R1, R2, R3, R6 and R7) reviewed for bed rails. In addition, R6 had side rails used in conjunction with an air mattress. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to attempt alternative devices before using bedrails on residents beds. The failed to accurately assess the residents for risk of entrapment by assessing residents medical diagnosis, size and weight, cognition, communication and mobility for 5 of 7 residents (R1, R2, R3, R6 and R7) reviewed for bed rails. In addition, the facility failed to use caution as R6 had side rails used in conjunction with an air mattress. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 72 residents who used bed/side…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-15 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — pattern
    Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to conduct regular inspections of all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails as a part of the regular maintenance program to identify areas of possible entrapment for 6 of 7 residents (R1, R2, R3, R4, R6 and R7) reviewed. The bed manufacturer guidelines indicated to visually inspect the bed and accessories monthly and indicated to follow the FDA guidance. Findings include: Recommendations for Health Care Providers Using Adult Portable Bed rails dated 2/27/2023 retrieved on 7/15/25 from https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/general-hospital-devices-and-supplies/hospital-beds indicated, When evaluating the safe use of a hospital bed, component or accessory, manufacturers and caregivers should recognize that the risk for entrapment may increase if a hospital bed system is used for purposes, or used in a care setting, not intended by the manufacturer. Evaluating the dimensional limits of gaps in hospital beds may be one component of a bed safety…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 46 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop a care and furnish services according to the providers orders for 1 of 3 residents (R4) reviewed. R4 was ordered to wear compression stocking and an abdominal binder. These services were not being completed. Findings include: R4's physician orders dated 4/17/25 at 9:00 a.m. indicated R4 was to have lymphedema therapy (aims to reduce swelling, alleviate symptoms, and manage symptoms of swelling in the arms and the leg). Wash and apply personal lotion daily. Apply compression compressions in the morning to wear 23/24 hours maximum of 48 years. Compression Xspan (brand name of sock) size 5 toes to just below the knee, 4 extra-long ace wrap from toes to just below the knee in a herring bone (figure 8) pattern. Tubi-grip (elasticated tubular bandage that provides support and compression) from toes to just below the knee-double extra over foot. Remove if painful or irritating. R4's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] indicated R4's BIMS score was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-15 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to provide the necessary services recommended by physical therapy to maintain or improve a residents ability to carry out her own activities of daily living for 1 of 3 residents (R4) reviewed. R4 was ordered a functional maintenance program when her physical therapy treatment period ended, and the facility did not initiate the program delaying R4's discharge goals. Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to provide the necessary services recommended by physical therapy to maintain or improve a residents ability to carry out her own activities of daily living for 1 of 3 residents (R4) reviewed. R4 was ordered a functional maintenance program when her physical therapy treatment period ended, and the facility did not initiate the program delaying R4's discharge goals. Findings included: R4's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated R4 had a Brief Inventory of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating R4 was cognitively intact.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-15 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure sufficient nursing staff available at all times to provide nursing services to meet the residents needs for 3 of 3 residents (R1, R2 and R4) reviewed when staff were unavailable to provide necessary care and services according to assessed needs leading to long wait times for incontinence cares.Findings include: The Facility Assessment Tool dated 1/7/25 indicated under staff acuity:-Dressing assistance the facility had 8 independents residents, 67 residents with assistance of 1-2 staff and 1 dependent resident. -Bathing - 4 independent residents, 21 with assistance of 1-2 and 23 dependent residents.Transferring 14 independent residents, 49 residents with assistance of 1-2 staff, 10 dependent residents-Eating - 62 independent residents, 12 residents with assistance of 1-2 and 2 dependent residents.-Toileting - 11 independent residents, 64 residents with assistance of 1-2, and 1 dependent resident.-Mobility - 7 independent residents,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-15 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure call lights, or another means to request assistance were accessible for 3 of 3 (R2, R5, and R7) residents who were dependent on staff for activities of daily living.Findings include: Upon observation and interview on 7/14/25 at 1:21 p.m. R2 was found in her room seated in her wheelchair with her pants off wearing an incontinent brief. R2 was attempting to get a pair of sweatpants on by herself. R2's bed was in the lowest position, there was a matt on the floor so R2 could not scoot herself in her wheelchair to reach her call light which was placed on her bed wrapped around her 1/4 side rail against the wall. R2 became agitated stating why can't you help me, why can't you help put my pants on? R2 attempted to stand up. The surveyor went to get assistance from registered nurse RN-A at 1:46 p.m. to assist R2. RN-A assisted R2 with getting her pants back on. RN-A left the room and got nursing assistant (NA)-A to assist with getting the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of potential abuse was reported timely to the administrator and to the State agency (SA) in accordance with established policies and procedures for 1 of 1 residents (R1) who was reviewed for an allegation of abuse. Findings include: A Facility Reported Incident (FRI), dated 6/21/25, at 4:55 p.m., was submitted to the SA which reported an alleged act of abuse towards R1. The report identified nursing assistant (NA)-D reported to the director of nursing (DON), that NA-A handled R1 roughly and [was] being verbally aggressive with [R1]. R1 was agitated by NA-A and attempted to bite NA-A. In response, NA-A held [R1's] arm to [R1's] mouth and said bite yourself. The report indicated this incident occurred 6/20/25, at 5:00 p.m.; however, additionally identified the administrator was updated 6/21/25, at 3:20 p.m. The report identified staff became aware of the incident on 6/20/25, at 3:15 p.m.; however, this date was in error as interviews identified the DON was initially updated on 6/21/25, and the incident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of potential verbal/ physical abuse was thoroughly investigated and protection was provided when the alleged perpetrator was allowed to continue to work with residents after the allegation was identified for 1 of 1 resident (R1) reviewed for an allegation of abuse. Findings include: A Facility Reported Incident (FRI), dated 6/21/25, at 4:55 p.m., was submitted to the State agency (SA) which reported an alleged act of abuse towards R1. The report identified nursing assistant (NA)-D reported to the director of nursing (DON), that NA-A handled R1 roughly and [was] being verbally aggressive with [R1]. R1 was agitated by NA-A and attempted to bite NA-A. In response, NA-A held [R1's] arm to [R1's] mouth and said bite yourself. The report indicated the incident occurred 6/20/25, at 5:00 p.m.; however, additionally identified the administrator was updated 6/21/25, at 3:20 p.m. The report identified staff became aware of the incident on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-14 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified timely of elevated blood sugars and a change condition for 1 of 2 residents (R2) reviewed for change of condition. Findings include: R2's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified he was admitted to facility on 3/1/25, from an acute care hospital with moderately impaired cognition. He required partial/moderate assistance with personal hygiene and dependent for chair/bed to chair transfers and toileting hygiene. His medical diagnoses included diabetes mellitus (DM) and hyperkalemia (high potassium). R2's provider orders identified: -3/1/25, insulin Aspart (rapid-acting insulin) flex-pen injector 100 unit/ml. Inject 10 units subcutaneously (SQ) with meals for diabetes. -3/1/25, blood sugars before meals and at bedtime for DM. -3/1/25, blood sugar ranges below 75 or greater than 400 update provider. -3/1/25, observe for dehydration, decreased skin turgor, dry mucus membranes, lethargy, fatigue, weakness,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) was appropriately managed based on professional standards of practice and in accordance with physician orders for 1 of 1 resident (R1) reviewed for intravenous (IV) medications. Findings include: R1's face sheet dated 4/3/25, identified diagnoses of cerebral vascular accident (stroke), sequelae of cerebral infarction (complications of stroke on brain and body). R1's hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE], identified R1 had diagnoses that included bacterial endocarditis. Treatment of Ceftriaxone (antibiotic) via PICC. Discharge order for Ceftriaxone 2-gram solution daily. R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified moderate cognitive impairment. R1 was administered IV antibiotic medication. R1's care plan dated 3/4/25, identified a current infection related to acute bacterial endocarditis (serious infection of the heart lining and valves). Give medications as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow infection control protocols to ensure proper handwashing was implemented for 2 of 4 residents (R1, R2); failed to ensure proper enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) were utilized appropriately for 2 of 2 residents (R1, R3); and failed to disinfect vital sign machine after use for 1 of 1 residents (R1). Findings include Enhanced barrier precautions: refer to an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multi-drug-resistant organism that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities. Gowns and gloves are used as personal protective equipment (PPE). R1 R1's face sheet dated 4/3/25, identified diagnoses of sequelae of cerebral infarction. R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified some cognitive impairment. Used intravenous (IV) medication of antibiotic. R1's care plan dated 2/25/25, EBP related to peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line. Staff to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure discharge summary requirements were met for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for discharge. R1 discharged from the facility against medical advice (AMA), R1's medical record did not include a recapitulation of resident's stay (a concise summary of the resident's stay and course of treatment in the facility) and a final summary of the resident's status at discharge. Findings include: R1 admission Record identified admission on [DATE]. R1's discharge plan assessment, dated 11/25/24 indicated R1 was looking for an assisted living facility after nursing home rehab was completed. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated R1 used a cane for mobility and was diagnosis with non-trauma spinal cord dysfunction, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, anxiety, depression, bipolar disease. Additional diagnoses included history of substance abuse. R1's progress note dated 11/28/24 at 11:23 p.m. indicated R1 was on a leave of absence (LOA), leaving the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to report allegations of neglect to the state agency immediately, but not later than two hours for one of one resident (R1) reviewed when R1's change in condition was not assessed, the physician was not notified, and R1's change in condition was not monitored by licensed nurses. R1 began vomiting on [DATE] and died in the facility on [DATE]. Findings include: R1's face sheet indicated R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder. R1's additional diagnoses included esophageal varies with bleeding, dysphagia, cognitive communication deficit, schizophrenia, peptic ulcer without hemorrhage or perforation, and personal history of a traumatic brain injury. R1 died while in the facility on [DATE]. R1's care plan dated [DATE] indicated staff would continue to follow the facility vulnerable adult and abuse reporting policy. R1's brief interview for mental status (BIMS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated R1 had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for one of three residents (R1) reviewed when R1 had a history of gastrointestinal bleeds that was not identified on her care plan. Findings include: R1's medical record indicated R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder. R1's additional diagnoses included esophageal varies with bleeding, dysphagia, cognitive communication deficit, schizophrenia, peptic ulcer without hemorrhage or perforation, and personal history of a traumatic brain injury. R1 died while in the facility on [DATE]. R1's brief interview for mental status (BIMS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated R1 had a score of fourteen, which indicated R1 was cognitively intact. R1's provider visit note dated [DATE] indicated R1 was diagnosed with an erosive esophagitis. The visit notes indicated R1 was admitted to the hospital from [DATE] to [DATE] for a gastrointestinal bleed. The visit notes indicated R1 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure personal protection equipment (PPE) was used when sorting dirty laundry. This had the potential to impact all 82 residents who reside in the facility. Findings include: During observation and interview on 9/19/24 at 10.24 a.m., Environmental Service Director (ESD) indicated the laundry aide would take the dirty laundry from the red chute in the laundry room and sort it. He indicated the staff was to wear a gown and gloves when handling dirty laundry. He indicated the gowns are to be hung on the wall in the dirty laundry room. He verified there were no gowns on the wall. Interview with laundry aide (LA) -A and LA- B at 10:35 a.m. they indicated there were no gowns, and there had not been for around a month. LA-B indicated she wears gloves when sorting dirty laundry, but no gowns have been available. Review of undated Contaminated Laundry policy indicated: • Employers must ensure that employees who have contact with contaminated laundry wear appropriate PPE as discussed in the Bloodborne Pathogen Standard…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain resident privacy and dignity 2 of 3 residents (R46, R11) reviewed for dignity. R46 R46's admission (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R46 had moderate cognitive impairment and required substantial and/or maximal assistance with most activities of daily living (ADLs), such as hygiene, dressing, and transfers. During observation on 9/18/24 at 7:30 a.m., R46 had their call light on. At 7:32 a.m., the social services designee (SS)-A knocked on R46's door and stated they would let them [the staff] know as they walked out of R46's room. At 7:34 a.m., SS-A stated loudly down the hall to nursing assistant (NA)-A R46 needed a check and change. During interview on 9/18/24 at 8:48 a.m., NA-A stated SS-A always does that when questioned about SS-A's statement in the hall. NA-A stated SS-A should come to staff and tell them what residents' need with a quieter voice. NA-A stated residents needed privacy and did not want other residents to think…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a self-administration of medications (SAM) assessment was completed to allow 1 of 1 resident (R30) to safely administer their own non-oral medications. Findings include: R30's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R30 was cognitively intact and had diagnoses of paraplegia (loss of muscle function in lower half of the body), cataracts (clouding of the lens of the eye), diabetes mellitus (condition which affects how body uses blood sugar), hypertension (high blood pressure), and renal failure (chronic kidney disease; loss of kidney function). R30 required substantial and/or maximal to dependent assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) such as dressing, toileting hygiene, and rolling left and right and was independent with ADLs such as eating and use of motorized wheelchair. R30's care plan dated 9/12/24, indicated R30 desired to self-administer TUMs (chewable antacid which treats symptoms cause by too much…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure resident use of shared toilet for 1 of 1 resident (R62) reviewed for accommodation of needs. Findings include: R62's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R62 had intact cognition and no behaviors or rejection of cares. R62 had limb prosthesis and used a wheelchair. R62 required partial and/or moderate assistance for toileting hygiene and toilet transfers and supervision and/or touching assistance for chair and/or bed-to-chair transfers and walking. The MDS indicated R62 was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. R62's Functional Abilities (Self-Care and Mobility) Care Area Assessment (CAA) Worksheet dated 6/14/24, was triggered due to assist needed with activities of daily living (ADLs), such as dressing, hygiene, sitting to standing, and transfers. R62's care plan dated 9/10/24, directed staff to provide R62 with supervision for non-weight bearing transfers, and R62 washed hands and held grab bars but…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure an enteral feeding pump, tube feeding pole, and supporting legs were cleaned and in sanitary condition for 1 of 2 residents (R11) reviewed for tube feeding. Furthermore, the facility failed to keep the building clean for 1 of 1 bathroom with an unclean exhaust fan and 1 of 1 room with an unclean wall vent and ceiling tiles. Also, the facility failed to keep furniture in good condition for 1 of 2 residents (R30) who had an extended table from a dresser in their room. Findings include: TUBE FEEDING EQUIPEMENT R11's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R11 was in a persistent vegetative state and/or had no discernible consciousness. R11 was dependent on staff for activities of daily living, such as oral and toileting hygiene, dressing, mobility, and transfers, and had impairment on both sides of upper and lower extremities. R11 had diagnoses of quadriplegia (severe or complete loss of motor function in all four…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and observation, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive and individualized care plan was developed for 1 of 1 resident (R49) reviewed for constipation. Findings include: R49's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated was cognitively intact, had verbal behaviors and rejection of care, used a walker, and was independent with most activities of daily living (ADLs), such as walking, hygiene, and transfers. R49 was occasionally incontinent of bladder and frequently incontinent of bowel. The MDS indicated R49 had end stage renal disease (medical condition in which a person's kidneys stop functioning on a permanent basis) and diabetes mellitus (condition which affects how body uses blood sugar). R49's care plan dated 9/16/24, lacked information about bowel and bladder incontinence, toileting, or constipation. R49's nursing progress notes indicated the following: -On 8/26/24 at 00:20 [12:20 a.m.], R49 called ambulance for stomach pain and constipation. -On 8/26/24 at 03:09 [3:09…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess and monitor non-pressure related skin conditions for 1 of 1 resident (R49) reviewed for skin concerns. Findings include: R49's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated was cognitively intact, had verbal behaviors and rejection of care, used a walker, and was independent with most activities of daily living (ADLs), such as walking, hygiene, and transfers. R49 was occasionally incontinent of bladder and frequently incontinent of bowel. The MDS indicated R49 had end stage renal disease (medical condition in which a person's kidneys stop functioning on a permanent basis) and diabetes mellitus (condition which affects how body uses blood sugar). The MDS did not indicate any behavioral symptoms not directed towards others, such as scratching self. R49 had diabetic foot ulcer, dressings to feet, and nonsurgical dressings to areas other than to feet. R49's care plan dated 9/16/24, direct staff to monitor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to provide routine range of motion for 1 of 2 residents (R11) reviewed for range of motion (ROM). Further, the facility failed to implement a walking program for 1 of 1 resident (R62) reviewed for walking program. Findings include: R11 R11's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R11 was in a persistent vegetative state and/or had no discernible consciousness. R11 was dependent on staff for activities of daily living, such as oral and toileting hygiene, dressing, mobility, and transfers, and had impairment on both sides of upper and lower extremities. R11 had diagnoses of quadriplegia (severe or complete loss of motor function in all four limbs) and epilepsy (brain condition which causes recurring burst of uncontrolled electrical activity and changes in behavior, movements, feelings, and levels of consciousness). The MDS indicated R11 had a feeding tube and no range of motion (for at least 15 minutes a day) in the last seven…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the current pneumococcal vaccination was offered for 1 of 5 residents (R47) reviewed for immunizations. Findings include: Review of R47 record indicated R47 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnosis including metabolic encephalopathy(brain dysfunction caused by a chemical imbalance in the blood that affect the brain) , and dementia Review of R47 record indicated R47's family gave written consent on 3/4/24, for R47 to receive the pneumococcal vaccine per PCP (Primary care provider) order and CDC (Center for Disease Control) guideline. R47's medical record lacked evidence R47 was offered or received the current pneumococcal vaccination. Interview on 9/19/24 at 4:40 p.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated if the consent was signed by the family, the physician would be notified, orders received, and the vaccination would be added to the medical record. The DON verified no orders were received from the physician. The DON indicated she would verify…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure accurate documentation of medications and treatments when residents were hospitalized for 2 of 3 (R1, R3) residents reviewed for documentation. Findings include: R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1 was cognitively intact, and required a two person assist for transferring and toileting. R1's Face Sheet undated, indicated R1 had diagnoses of peripheral vascular disease, type II diabetes, personal history of venous thrombosis and embolism. R1's June medication administration record (MAR) had the following omissions: -Hydromorphone Hydrochloride (narcotic pain medication) tablet 4 milligrams (mg). Give 4 milligrams by mouth every 4 hours for pain, start date 6/19/25. On 6/23 at 8:00 p.m., the box was left blank. LPN-D was assigned to R1 for that shift. -Acticoat (silver dressing) dry to incision line Xeroform (occlusive dressing) and the rest, cover with gauze and tape to secure. One time a day for wound. Start date…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure required information was documented and communicated to a receiving healthcare facility to ensure continuity of care when transferred to the hospital emergently for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for change in condition. Findings include: R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1's cognition was severely impaired, and diagnosis was dementia. R1 required supervision with bed mobility, transfers, walking, toileting and eating. In addition, R1 required limited assist of one staff member with personal hygiene and dressing, and no mobility device was used. MDS identified R1 did not have a pressure ulcer. R1's nurse practitioner (NP) acute care visit dated 11/10/23, indicated R1 had a sharp decline in condition to include a new pressure sore on sacral area. Nursing reported no oral intake in the past several days and a sharp decline in condition in the last 24 hours. R1 required total assist with activities of daily living…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-07-14 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — pattern
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to provide an opportunity to participate in care planning for 4 of 4 residents (R21, R29, R73, R56) reviewed for care conferences. Findings include: R21 R21's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated she was cognitively intact, independent with bed mobility, transfers, and toileting, and had diagnoses of heart failure, diabetes, lung disease, anxiety, and depression. The MDS indicated there was not an active discharge plan in place for her to return to the community. R21's care plan discharge focus updated 7/20/22, indicated she wished to discharge to the community to live with her mother, and instructed staff to discuss discharge goals and status with resident regularly and update on progress. R21's MHM IDT Care Conference Form V-3 dated 2/9/23, indicated she was working with a relocation worker for transitional service with a goal to discharge back to the community and live with her mother. R21's medical record lacked evidence of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-07-14 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure resident council concerns were addressed or followed-up on in a timely manner. This had the potential to affect 12 residents who attended the resident council meetings in the previous six months. Findings include: Resident Council notes dated 1/27/23, indicated the following concerns: -The evening shift taking 45 minutes to an hour to answer call lights. -Building not clean. Resident Council notes dated 2/24/23, indicated the following concerns: -Residents waiting too long for medications. -Staff on personal phones while call lights are activated. -Gnats and bugs in the facility. Resident Council notes dated 3/31/23, indicated the following concerns: -Long wait times for meals. -Want educational-style activities that are learning based. -Call light times remain long. -Staff continue to talk on their personal phones. Resident Council notes dated 4/28/23, indicate the following concerns: -Call light wait times. -Ants in the second-floor dining room. -Dirty windows and floors. Resident Council notes dated 5/26/23,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-07-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to complete a comprehensive fall analysis to determine root cause, develop and implement resident-centric interventions, and monitor for post-fall complications following a fall for 1 of 1 residents (R73) reviewed for falls. In addition, the facility failed to ensure the environment was free from hazards to prevent falls and accidents for 4 of 4 residents (R39, R27, R31, R55) in the locked, memory care unit. Findings include: R73's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], indicated he was moderately cognitively impaired, required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility, transfers, and toilet use, was always continent of urine, frequently incontinent of bowel, and not on a toileting program. He had a diagnosis of lung disease. The MDS indicated he did not have any falls since admission or most recent assessment. R73's Medical Diagnosis list included diabetes, weakness, and bilateral below-the-knee leg amputations (BKA). R73's Falls Care Area…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-14 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to notify resident representatives and/or a provider for 3 of 3 residents (R27, R39, R238) who had a change in condition and/or were involved in incidents resulting in potential or actual harm. Findings include: R27 R27's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R27 had severe cognitive deficits and was independent with eating. R27 had diagnoses that included high blood pressure, viral hepatitis C, dementia, behavioral and psychotic disturbance, anxiety, and paranoid schizophrenia. R27's Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 8/11/22, indicated R27 triggered for cognitive loss/dementia, psychotropic drug use, pressure ulcers, and nutrition. R27's care plan dated 7/20/22, indicated R27 had severely impaired thought processes and needed assistance and supervision with all decision making. Interventions included communicating with R27's family/caregivers regarding R27's capabilities and needs. R27 also had a psychosocial well-being problem…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to minimize verbal resident-to-resident abuse for 1 of 1 resident (R30) reviewed who was verbally abused by another resident (R58) . Findings include: R30's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated R30 was mildly cognitively impaired and identified diagnoses including stroke, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), schizoaffective disorder (a mental health disorder characterized by a combination of symptoms including mood alterations), and anxiety. The MDS also identified R30 as Black or African American and R30 was dependent on staff for transfers, utilized a wheelchair but was unable to self-propel the chair. R30's care plan dated 4/21/23, identified R30 as a vulnerable adult and was at risk for abuse and/ or neglect. The plan directed staff to observed R30 for signs and symptoms of abuse and neglect and report to the facility social services or supervisor for appropriate follow up. R58's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-14 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of resident-to-resident sexual abuse for 1 of 1 residents (R39). Findings include: A Nursing Home Incident Report (NHIR) dated 2/13/23, indicated R39 was seen holding hands with a male resident and entered his room. Upon entering the room, staff witnessed the male resident with his pants down, exposing himself to R39. An Investigation Report dated 2/13/23, indicated staff witnessed R39 and R55 holding hands as they walked down the hall and into R55's room. Upon entry to R55's room, staff saw R55 with his pants down, exposing his genitals to R39. The report indicated R39 was not interviewable. The report indicated R55 reported he was in his bathroom and when he came out, R39 was in his room, although staff witnessed them walk down the hall and into his room together. R55 was placed on a 1:1 for monitoring, although R55 had been on a 1:1 at the time of the occurrence related to previous inappropriate behaviors. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-14 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure a level I Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) level I was completed and accurate prior to admission to the facility for 1 of 1 residents (R27). Findings include: R27's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R27 had severe cognitive deficits with diagnoses that included borderline intellectual functioning, behavioral and psychotic disturbance, and paranoid schizophrenia. R27's hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE], indicated R27 had the following diagnoses: -6/13/07, paranoid schizophrenia -5/14/07, schizoaffective disorder R27's PASRR dated 7/14/22, indicated the PAS [PASRR] was not final until the lead agency sends the documentation to the nursing facility. In addition, the results indicated R27 did not have a current diagnosis of a mental illness and lacked indication R27 had a diagnosis with paranoid schizophrenia. During an interview on 7/13/23 at 3:30 p.m., the social services representative (SSR) stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-14 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to comprehensively assess, update, and implements a care plan for 1 of 1 resident (R55) who continued to have behaviors with no new interventions. Findings include: R55's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R55 had severe cognitive deficits and a Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) score of 19, indicating R55 had major depression that was moderately severe. The MDS also indicated R55 was independent with all activities of daily living (ADLs). R55 had diagnoses that included major depression, dementia without behavioral disturbance, cognitive communication deficit, and adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety. R55's Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 2/24/23, indicated R55 triggered for delirium, cognitive loss/dementia, communication, and psychotropic drug use. R55's care plan dated 2/13/23, indicated the following behaviors: -12/1/2022: R55 was found with a female resident (R31) in his bed. R55 was already on a 1:1 and no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to provide timely assistance with incontinence cares for 1 of 3 residents (R25) who were dependent upon staff for incontinence cares. Findings include: R25's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated R25 had significant cognitive impairment and diagnoses including encephalopathy (brain damage) and hemiparesis (weakness of one side of the body). The MDS indicated R25 required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility, transfers, toileting and was unable to ambulate. R25 was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. R25's care plan directed staff to assist R25 to the toilet after a meal for a bowel program as well as to check and change incontinent brief before and after meals and as needed to prevent skin breakdown. An undated, nursing care assignment sheet indicated R25 was to be assisted with toileting every 2-3 hours. The care plan further indicated R25 was on a bowel program that directed staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-14 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess, develop, and implement meaningful and engaging activities for 2 of 2 residents (R27, R39) in the memory care unit. This had the potential to affect all 20 residents residing in the memory care unit. Findings include: R27's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R27 had severe cognitive deficits, was independent with eating, required extensive assistance with all other activities of daily living (ADLs) and was independent with walking. R27's Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 6/11/23, indicated R27 triggered for cognitive loss/dementia, communication, behaviors, psychotropic drug use, and falls. R27's Customary Routine and Activities assessment dated [DATE], indicated it was very important to R27 to listen to music, be around animals, do her favorite activities, go outside, and to participate in religious activities. It was somewhat important for R27 to do activities in groups. The assessment further…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-14 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to comprehensively assess, develop, and implement interventions for ongoing and unplanned weight gain for 1 of 1 residents (R27) who had sudden and continued weight gain. Findings include: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) About Adult BMI article dated 6/3/22, indicated a body mass index (BMI) for adults (over the age of 20 years) of 25.0 to 29.9 was categorized as overweight, and a BMI of 30.0 and above was obese. The article also indicated people who were obese were at an increased risk for many disease and health conditions including but not limited to: death, high blood pressure, diabetes, heart disease, stroke, osteoarthritis (a degenerative joint disease), mental illnesses (depression, anxiety) and a low quality of life. R27's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R27 had severe cognitive deficits and was independent with eating. R27 had diagnoses that included viral hepatitis C, dementia, anxiety, high blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-14 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to adequately maintain bed rails to minimize the risk of entrapment for 1 of 1 resident (R73) reviewed who had bed rails attached to their bed. Findings include: R73's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], indicated he was moderately cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility, transfers, and toilet use. The MDS indicated he did not use bed rails. R73's safety device care plan focus dated 10/7/23, indicated he had bilateral amputation of both legs below the knee and used right and left grab bars (bed rails). It instructed staff to evaluate safety device use quarterly and as needed, including risk/benefits, alternatives, need for ongoing use, and reason for safety device. R73's MHM Bed Mobility Device Evaluation dated 5/12/23, indicated R73 requested bed rails and had ¼ rails in upright position used as grab bars to assist with transfers to maintain independence. A progress note dated 4/3/23, indicated R73 slid…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-14 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a safe, functional environment for 1 of 1 resident (R73) reviewed whose bed did not lock and bed controller did not work. R73's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], indicated he was moderately cognitively impaired, required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility, transfers, and toilet use. The MDS indicated he did not have any falls since the most recent assessment. R73's Medical Diagnosis list included bilateral below-the-knee leg amputations (BKA), diabetes, weakness, and lung disease. R73's Falls Care Area assessment dated [DATE], indicated he was at risk for falls due to changes in mobility and medications. A progress note dated 3/3/23, indicated R73 had an unwitnessed fall after attempting to self-transfer. A progress note dated 4/3/23, indicated R73 had an unwitnessed fall and slipped out of bed onto the floor. A progress note dated 4/5/23, indicated R73's fall was reviewed by the interdisciplinary team, and included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-09-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to follow the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines to prevent and/or minimize the transmission of COVID-19 related to the proper utilization of personal protective equipment (PPE) including facemasks and eye protection. This had the potential to affect 22 residents who resided on the [NAME] neighborhood. Findings include: R8's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R8 had intact cognition and ate independently. R35's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], indicated R35 had intact cognition and ate independently. R91's significant change MDS dated [DATE], indicated R91 had severely impaired cognition and needed extensive assistance with locomotion. On 9/13/21, at 6:21 p.m. dietary aide (DA)-A was observed dishing meals in a satellite kitchen located in the [NAME] neighborhood dining room. A facemask was pulled below DA-A's nose. DA-A delivered soup to R8 who was seated in the dining room. DA-A was within two feet from R8 for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-09-17 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure privacy curtains, resident walls, and fall mats were clean and/or in good repair for 4 of 4 residents (R42, R33, R28, R10) reviewed for environment. Findings include: R42's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R42 had a severe cognitive impairment. R42's diagnoses included dementia with behavioral disturbance. On 9/13/21, at 1:36 p.m. R42's privacy curtain was observed to have three circular one inch sized dark brown spots of dried material. Additionally, 20 various sized light brown spots, which were dry, were noted on the privacy curtain. Four areas on the wall, above R42 bed, contained a dried light brown substance. Further, a fall matt which was placed next to R42's bed had a four inch tear which exposed the interior foam. R33's annual MDS dated [DATE], indicated R33 had a severe cognitive impairment. R33's diagnoses included dementia. On 9/13/21, at 3:07 p.m. R33's privacy curtain was observed to have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-09-17 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure a self-administration of medication assessment was completed for 1 of 1 resident (R10) who was observed with medications at her bedside. Findings include: R10's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R10 had intact cognition and diagnoses which included type II diabetes and visual disturbances. A Physician Order dated 3/26/20, indicated levothyroxine sodium (thyroid medication) tablet 88 micrograms (mcg), give 1 tablet by mouth one time daily During an observation on 9/13/21, at 3:23 p.m. R10 had a plastic medication cup which contained 10 pills. R10 stated the medications were, from the day before. R10 stated she did not take the medications because she was legally blind and was not sure what medications were in the cup. During an observation on 9/15/21, at 7:51 a.m. trained medication assistant (TMA)-B entered R10's room to administer medications and R10 pointed to a medication cup which contained a single…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-09-17 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of a pattern of increased blood glucose levels for 1 of 1 resident (R10) reviewed who received insulin. Findings include: According to the American Diabetes Association (ADA), the recommended blood glucose range (before meals) was 80 - 130 milligrams (mg) per deciliter (dL). R10's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R10 had intact cognition and diagnoses of type 2 diabetes mellitus and visual disturbances. R10's Order Summary Report dated 9/16/21, indicated R10 was ordered the following: - Blood glucose check three times daily before meals for diabetes mellitus dated 4/29/21. - R10 was okay to check her own blood glucose and administer Humalog and Lantus insulin under nursing supervision dated 1/10/21. - Humalog 100 units (u)/milliliter (mL). Inject 5 units subcutaneously (injection in fat tissue) with meals for diabetes mellitus unsupervised self-administration. Lantus 100 u/mL. Inject 10 units…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-09-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan to reflect individualized goals for 1 of 4 residents (R38) reviewed for care planning. Findings include: R38's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R38 had a mild cognitive impairment and required one to two person physical assistance with most activities of daily living (ADLs). R38's MDS further indicated R38's diagnoses included dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), right sided hemiplegia/hemiparesis (paralysis/weakness affecting half of the body), and major depressive disorder. The MDS further indicated R38 received occupational and physical therapy. R38's care plan dated 7/21/21, indicated R38, has (SPECIFY) actual/potential for an ADL self-care performance deficit r/t [related to]. 38's goal was documented as, The resident will maintain current level of function in (SPECIFY) through the review date. Interventions included, Monitor/document/report PRN [as needed] any changes, any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-09-17 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure assistance was provided with removing facial hair and dressing and/or bathing was for 2 of 4 residents (R58, R3) reviewed who required staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADL). R58's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R58 had diagnoses of chronic kidney failure, heart failure, and diabetes. R58 had intact cognition, used a walker for mobility, and required set up assistance with bathing. R58's Active Order Summary dated 9/16/21, indicated R58 received dialysis on Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday. R58's dialysis dressing was to be removed the day after dialysis. R58's care plan dated 3/25/21, indicated R58 would continue to make daily preferences/choices which were important to him. R58's care plan lacked evidence of bathing preferences. R58's Nursing Assistant task sheet (undated) indicated R58 was scheduled for showers on Saturday evenings and required assistance with bathing. R58's Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-09-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to provide assistance removing facial hair for 2 of 2 residents reviewed who were dependent upon staff for hygiene assistance. Findings include: R32's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R32 had a moderate cognitive impairment and required extensive assistance with personal hygiene. R32's diagnoses included dementia with behavioral disturbance. R32's care plan revised 9/28/20, indicated, Grooming: limited assist of 1. On 9/13/21, at 1:30 p.m. R32 was observed to have 1/4 inch long hairs across her chin. R32 stated she did not want hair on her chin and needed staff's help to remove it. R32 stated she would like her chin hairs removed daily. R32 was unsure when staff last assisted her with shaving. On 9/14/21, at 1:52 p.m. R32's chin hair remained unchanged. R32 stated staff had not offered to assist her removing the hair. On 9/15/21, at 10:08 a.m. R32's chin hair remained unchanged. During an interview on 9/15/21, at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-09-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure daily weights were obtained for 2 of 2 residents (R85, R443) reviewed whom had daily weights ordered. Findings include: R85's Face Sheet dated 9/16/21, indicated R85's diagnoses included cerebral infarction (stroke), essential hypertension (high blood pressure), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (airflow blockage which causes breathing related issues). R85's admission Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], indicated R85 was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance with transfers, toileting, and personal hygiene. R85's care plan dated 8/25/21, indicated R85 had congestive heart failure with interventions which included monitoring for edema (swelling) of the legs and feet, periorbital (area around eyes), shortness of breath upon exertion, and weight gain. A Physician Progress Note dated 8/26/21, indicated R85 was admitted to the facility related to bilateral pneumonia and newly diagnosed with congestive heart failure. R85 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-09-17 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a urinary drainage bag and catheter tubing was kept off the floor to prevent cross contamination and potential infection for 1 of 1 residents (R42) reviewed for catheters. Findings include: R42's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R42 had a severe cognitive impairment, an indwelling catheter, and required extensive assistance with toilet use. R42's diagnoses included neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, dementia, and multiple sclerosis. R42's care plan dated 2/13/18 indicated, Alteration in urinary elimination r/t [related to] suprapubic catheter. On 9/14/21, at 1:57 p.m. R42 was observed lying in bed. R42's urinary drainage bag was placed on a fall mat next to R42's bed. The fall mat was visibly soiled with three quarter-sized brown spots and gray and brown smudges. At 2:25 p.m. registered nurse (RN)-A observed the urinary drainage bag lying on the fall matt, next to R42's bed, and stated there was no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2021-09-17 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the posted nurse staffing hours accurately reflected the hours worked each day. This had the potential to affect all 92 residents who resided at the facility. Findings include: During a comparison review of daily schedules and daily facility postings of staffed hours from 9/1/21, through 9/14/21, the posted hours did not accurately reflect the number of nursing hours worked in the facility. The comparisons reflected the for 7 of the 14 days reviewed, the nursing hours posted were higher than the actual nursing hours worked reflected on the schedule. During an interview on 9/16/21, at 2:28 p.m. the director of nursing (DON) stated the scheduler posted schedules and was responsible to update the posted nursing hours worked. The DON stated the posted nurse staffing hours needed to be updated for sick calls and partial shifts. The DON stated her expectation was for the postings to be updated by the scheduler or night supervisor. During an interview on 9/16/21, at 2:49 p.m. the administrator stated they expected the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$22,205 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $22,205 — penalty dated 2024-09-19

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MONARCH HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT — 45 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.2-1.2 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.1-1.1 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 53.7+0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.0+1.0 vs chain
The other 44 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Hillcrest Health Care, LLCMankato, MN 1 of 5Maplewood Rehabilitation CenterMaplewood, MN 1 of 5The Emeralds At Fairbault LLCFaribault, MN 1 of 5The Emeralds At Grand Rapids LLCGrand Rapids, MN 1 of 5The Emeralds At St Paul LLCSaint Paul, MN 1 of 5The Estates At Excelsior LLCExcelsior, MN 1 of 5The Estates At Lynnhurst LLCSaint Paul, MN 1 of 5The Villas At BrookviewGolden Valley, MN 1 of 5The Villas At New BrightonNew Brighton, MN 1 of 5The Villas At Osseo LLCOsseo, MN 1 of 5The Villas At RobbinsdaleRobbinsdale, MN 1 of 5The Waterview Pines LLCVirginia, MN 1 of 5The Waterview Shores LLCTwo Harbors, MN 1 of 5The Waterview Woods LLCEveleth, MN 1 of 5Villas At Bryn Mawr LLCMinneapolis, MN 2 of 5Bayside Manor LLCGaylord, MN 2 of 5Oaklawn Health Care, LLCMankato, MN 2 of 5Parmly On The Lake LLCChisago City, MN 2 of 5The Estates At Chateau LLCMinneapolis, MN 2 of 5The Estates At Fridley LLCFridley, MN 2 of 5The Estates At Roseville LLCRoseville, MN 2 of 5The Estates At Rush City LLCRush City, MN 2 of 5The Estates At Twin Rivers LLCAnoka, MN 2 of 5The Gardens At Foley LLCFoley, MN 2 of 5The Gardens At Winsted LLCWinsted, MN 2 of 5The North Shore Estates LLCDuluth, MN 2 of 5The Villas At St Louis ParkSaint Louis Park, MN 2 of 5The Villas At St PaulSaint Paul, MN 2 of 5The Villas At The ParkSaint Louis Park, MN 3 of 5Bethany On The Lake LLCAlexandria, MN 3 of 5Laurels Peak Health Care, LLCMankato, MN 3 of 5Meeker Manor Rehablitation Center, LLCLitchfield, MN 3 of 5River Valley Health And Rehabilitation Center LLCRedwood Falls, MN 3 of 5The Estates At Bloomington LLCBloomington, MN 3 of 5The Estates At St Louis Park LLCSaint Louis Park, MN 3 of 5The Villas At RichfieldRichfield, MN 3 of 5The Villas At RosevilleRoseville, MN 4 of 5Lakeshore Rehabilitation Center LLCWaseca, MN 4 of 5Mala Strana Health Care, LLCNew Prague, MN 4 of 5Sleepy Eye Rehabilitati CenterSleepy Eye, MN

Showing 40 of 44; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
NIJ LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST16%since 01/01/2023
SPARTAN HEALTHCARE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST32%since 01/01/2023
WBS HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST26%since 01/01/2023
YAZOMA HOLDINGS, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST26%since 01/01/2023
HALPERT, MARCIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL32%since 01/01/2023
JAFFA, NOAMIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR16%since 01/01/2023
LEGUM, JOSHUAIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE26%since 01/01/2023
STERN, WILLIAMIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER26%since 01/01/2023
MONARCH HEALTHCARE OPERATING XII LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-7.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.0M
Related-party expense9% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 70%Medicare 3%Other / private 27%

This home reported $1.0M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$339per resident / day
operating cost
$10,307per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$315per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MN

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Minnesota Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Minnesota
$10,646/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,870/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,573/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 245187. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-09-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next