River Valley Health And Rehabilitation Center LLC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 24% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 91% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 43 beds and averages 33.3 residents a day — about 77% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.62 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.39 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.02 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.18 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.79 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.54 to 1.01 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 84% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-01-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to comprehensively assess proper full body mechanical lift sling type and size according to manufacturer recommendations to ensure safety for 1 of 1 residents (R1). This resulted in immediate jeopardy (IJ) for R1 who had a history of behaviors during lift transfers, fell from the lift and suffered a shoulder fracture. The immediate jeopardy began on 1/19/25, when staff used a hygiene (toileting) sling that was too large causing R1 to experience pain resulted in behaviors and fell through the lift sling to the floor. The administrator, director of nursing, corporate nurse, and regional director of operations were notified of the IJ at 5:00 p.m. on 1/27/25. The facility implemented immediate corrective action on 1/19/25 to prevent recurrence, so the IJ was issued at past none compliance. Findings include: A facility Reported Incident (FRI) submitted to the state agency (SA) on 1/19/25 at 12:40 p.m., alleged potential caregiver neglect when R1 fell through…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-24 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to notify the medical provider with a change in condition for 1 of 1 resident (R33) reviewed for notification of change. Finding include:R33's face sheet provided on 3/24/26, included diagnosis of heart disease. R33's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated severe cognitive impairment, clear speech, could understand and be understood. R33 required supervision or partial assistance for most activities of daily living.R33's physician orders did not include an order for transfer to the hospital. Facility standing orders did not provide guidance for transfer to the hospital. R33's care plan did not include focus areas for heart disease or respiratory concerns.Progress notes indicated no documentation that a provider had been notified for three consecutive transports to the local emergency department (ED):--On 2/22/26 at 2:15 p.m., R33 was transported by ambulance to the ED for bilateral lung crackles, wheezing and shortness of breath.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-24 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to accurately code the presence of a pressure ulcer on the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 1 of 3 residents (R20) reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings Include: R20's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], no cognitive impairment, required supervision with personal hygiene, and dependent with dressing, toileting, and transfers; diagnosis included pressure ulcer of sacral region unspecified stage, and Section M-Skin Conditions indicated R20 had no unhealed pressure ulcers/injuries. R20's Interim Payment Assessment MDS dated [DATE], indicated one or more unhealed pressure ulcers, and one stage 3 pressure ulcer. R20's care plan dated 1/19/26, indicated pressure injury to buttocks and interventions included; Monitor skin integrity daily during cares, .weekly skin inspection by nurse , treatment to open areas per order. R20's hospital summary report dated 1/15/26, indicated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-24 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to follow ordered wound care treatments, failed to ensure availability and use of ordered supplies, and failed to notify the provider when treatments were not completed for a pressure-related wound for 1 of 3 residents (R10) reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings include: R10's discharge assessment - return anticipated Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated no cognitive impairment, required substantial/maximal assistance with personal hygiene, dependent on assistance with transfers, utilized a wheelchair, diagnoses included sepsis, burn of third degree on the buttock; unhealed pressure ulcers/injuries, one stage 3 pressure ulcer that was present upon admission/entry or reentry. R10's entry tracking MDS dated [DATE], indicated on 3/16/26, R10 was readmitted from a short-term general hospital. R10's care plan revision dated 3/17/26, indicated pressure ulceration to R (right) buttock and R dorsum foot and interventions included…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-24 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to administer a physician-ordered medication for 1 of 1 resident (R37), when lorazepam (used to treat anxiety) was not administered. The facility did not notify the provider or leadership, or implement an alternative intervention, resulting in a medication omission for several days. Findings include:R37's face sheet provided on 3/24/26, included diagnoses of congestive heart failure (when heart muscles cannot pump enough blood to meet the body's needs) and generalized anxiety. R37's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated intact cognition, clear speech, could understand and be understood. R37 was either independent or needed partial assistance for most activities of daily living and was independent with walking. R37's handwritten physician order dated 12/12/25, (no time listed) indicated to start lorazepam 0.25 mg (milligram), 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. R37's care plan dated 11/10/24, indicated R37 was at risk for alteration in comfort and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-13 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a registered nurse (RN) was on duty a minimum of eight consecutive hours per day for four of 30 days reviewed for RN coverage. This had the potential to affect all 35 residents residing at the facility. Findings include: Review of the nursing staff schedules from 4/13/25-5/13/25, identified there was no RN that worked for a minimum of eight hours per day. During an interview on 5/13/25 at 12:35 p.m., scheduling coordinator (SC)-A stated the facility was supposed to have an RN scheduled eight hours per day. It had been difficult lately, but she tried her best to fill the gaps utilizing facility staff, corporate agency staff, and outside staffing agencies. There had been gaps with RN coverage on the weekends recently. SC-A reviewed the schedules and identified there was no RN coverage for the facility on 4/27/25 (Sunday), 5/4/25 (Sunday), 5/10/25 (Saturday), and 5/11/25 (Sunday). SC-A stated the facility currently only had two RN's in-house, and had to rely on outside sources to fill the gaps in coverage, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-05 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a registered nurse (RN) was on duty a minimum of 8 consecutive hours per day for 5 of 7 days reviewed. This had the potential to affect all 32 residents living in the facility. Findings include: Review of the nursing staff schedules and time punches for 8/29/24, 9/8/24, 9/28/24, 9/29/24 and 1/11/25 identified there was no evidence an RN had worked for a minimum of 8 hours per day. Interview on 2/5/25 at 11:23 a.m., with RN-B identified the facility was short on RN coverage and either she or the director of nursing (DON) would attempt to cover those shifts as charge nurse or floor nurse, however some days no replacements could be assigned. She confirmed for the above dates, there was no RN working. Interview and document review on 2/5/25 at 12:38 p.m., with the administrator confirmed the facility failed to provide consecutive 8 hours per day of RN coverage on the above mentioned dates due to the lack of available RN staff. The facility had been attempting to recruit staff, and they also had staff hired who then…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Waiver has been granted
• Potential for harm · F2025-02-05 · tag F0851 — widespread
  Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to submit accurate staffing data based on payroll and other verifiable, auditable data during 1 of 1 quarter reviewed (Quarter 4), to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), according to specifications established by CMS. This had the potential to affect all 32 residents living in the facility. Findings include: Review of the July 2024, Electronic Staffing Data Submission Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) Frequently Asked Questions, located at https://www.cms.gov/medicare/quality-initiatives-patient-assessment-instruments/nursinghomequalityinits/downloads/pbj-policy-manual-faq-11-19-2018.pdf, identified reporting shall be based on the employee ' s primary role. It is understood that most roles have a variety of non-primary duties that are conducted throughout the day (e.g., helping out when needed). Facilities shall still report just the total hours of that employee based on their primary role. However, CMS recognizes that staff may completely shift their primary role in a given day. For example, a nurse who spends…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-05 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to timely notify the physician of new onset pressure ulcers for 1 of 1 resident (R7). Findings include: R7's 11/15/24, annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) identified R7 was cognitively intact and had a diagnosis of dementia, anxiety, depression, psychotic disorder (impaired relationship with reality, confusion, hallucinations and delusions) and malnutrition. R7 was at risk for pressure ulcer development and no pressure ulcers at the time of the assessment. R7 required supervision or touching assistance with bed mobility, transfers, and toileting. R7 had an indwelling catheter during the look back period. R7's current, undated, care plan identified on 8/9/24, he was noted to be at risk for alteration in mobility related to weakness and dementia. At that time, R7 was independent with bed mobility, had grabs bars to assist with bed mobility, could safely enter and exit his bed, and was independent with locomotion in his wheelchair. R7's 11/14/24,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure ventilator equipment supply water was not expired for 1 of 1 (R18). Findings include: R18's [DATE], annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) identified R18 had a diagnoses of respiratory failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and was cognitively intact. R18 had used a non-invasive mechanical ventilation system, along with 02 therapy. R18's current, undated care plan identified R18 used a ventilator for her COPD. The nursing staff were directed to replace the tubing and 02 chamber, clean and inspect the tubing, and notify the respiratory company of any damage to the machine or if there staff had any concerns. Observation and interview on [DATE] at 12:19 p.m., with licensed practical nurse (LPN)-A while in R18's room and later in the storage room, identified R18 had a ventilator (a non-invasive ventilator with a mask used to assist COPD patients with easier breathing) which sat on the table next to R18's bed. The ventilator…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-05 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
  Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to assess and meet the needs of 1 of 1 (R7) resident reviewed for the provision of medically related social services, who was grieving the death of a significant other. Findings include: R7's 11/15/24, annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) identified R7 was cognitively intact and had a diagnoses of dementia, anxiety, depression, psychotic (impaired relationship with reality, confusion, hallucinations and delusions) disorder and malnutrition. R7 had little interest or pleasure in doing things and had trouble falling or staying asleep or sleeping too much 12 to 14 days. R7 had felt down, depressed, hopeless, had a poor appetite, felt bad about himself, or have let himself or his family down, had trouble concentrating on things, moving or speaking slowly that other people would not have notice, and thoughts that R7 would be better off dead or wanting to hurt himself in some way never to 1 day. R7's current, undated care plan identified R7 was at risk for alteration of mood and behavior. Staff were to provide redirection,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$14,310 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $14,310 — penalty dated 2025-01-27

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MONARCH HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT — 45 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $623K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MN